221 Analysis 2, 2008-09 Summary of Theorems and Definitions: Measure Theory

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

221 Analysis 2, 200809

Summary of theorems and denitions


Measure theory
Denition. The extended real line is the set
[, ] = R {, }
where and are two symbols which do not belong to R. We extend
order, addition and product on R to [, ] in the natural way by
dening, for any x R:
(i). < x, x < and < ;
(ii). () +x = = x + (), +x = = x +, + =
and () + () = (note that () + is not dened);
(iii). x = x =
_

_
if x > 0
0 if x = 0
if x < 0
, = = () () and
() y = ( y) = y () for any y [, ].
Denition. Let X be a set. We write P(X) = {all subsets of X}.
Denition. Let X be a set. A collection A P(X) of subsets of X is
called a ring of subsets of X , or simply a ring , if
(i). A,
(ii). A, B A = A \ B A, and
(iii). A, B A = A B A.
Denition. A measure is a function m: A [0, ], where A is a ring of
subsets of a set X, such that
(i). m() = 0, and
(ii). m
_

_
i=1
A
i
_
=

i=1
m(A
i
) whenever
A
i
A for i 1,
A
i
A
j
= for i = j, and

i=1
A
i
A.
We abbreviate property (ii) by saying that m is
countably additive on disjoint unions , or just countably additive .
1
Proposition. Let m: A [0, ] be a measure, where A is a ring of
subsets of X. Then
(i). if A, B A with A B, then m(A) m(B);
(ii). if A, B A with A B and m(B) < then
m(B \ A) = m(B) m(A).
Lemma (The disjoint unions trick). If A is a ring of subsets of a set X
and A
i
A for i = 1, 2, . . . then there are pairwise disjoint sets

A
i
A with

A
i
A
i
and

_
i=1

A
i
=

_
i=1
A
i
.
Theorem (Measures are countably subadditive). Let m: A [0, ] be a
measure where A is a ring. For any A
i
A, i = 1, 2, . . . , we have
m
_

_
i=1
A
i
_

i=1
m(A
i
).
Denition. If A
i
X for i = 1, 2, . . . and A X,
A
i
A means A
1
A
2
. . . and A =

_
i=1
A
i
;
A
i
A means A
1
A
2
. . . and A =

i=1
A
i
.
Theorem (Increasing unions and decreasing intersections).
Let m: A [0, ] be a measure, where A is a ring of subsets of X, and let
A
i
A for i = 1, 2, . . . .
(i). If A
i
A where A A, then m(A
i
) m(A) as i .
(ii). If A
i
A where A A and if m(A
1
) < , then m(A
i
) m(A) as
i .
Denition. Let X be a set. A collection A P(X) of subsets of X is
called a -algebra if
(i). A,
(ii). A A = A

A [we write A

= X \ A], and
(iii). A
i
A for i = 1, 2, . . . =

i=1
A
i
A.
Proposition.
If A is a -algebra and A
i
A for i = 1, 2, . . . then

i=1
A
i
A.
2
Denition. Let m: A [0, ] be a measure where A is a ring of subsets
of a set X. The outer-measure of m is the function m

: P(X) [0, ]
dened for any Y X by
m

(Y ) = inf
_

i=1
m(A
i
): A
i
A for i = 1, 2, . . . and Y

_
i=1
A
i
_
.
Theorem. If A A then m

(A) = m(A). So m

extends m.
Theorem. (i). If A, B X with A B then m

(A) m

(B).
(ii). m

is countably subadditive. That is, if Y


i
X for i = 1, 2, . . . then
m

_

_
i=1
Y
i
_

i=1
m

(Y
i
).
Denition. Let m: A [0, ] be a measure where A is a ring of subsets
of a set X. A set B X is m-measurable if for any Y X,
m

(Y ) = m

(Y B) +m

(Y \ B).
no proof Theorem (The Extension Theorem). Let m: A [0, ] be a measure
where A is a ring of subsets of a set X, and let M denote the collection of
all m-measurable subsets of X.
(i). A M,
(ii). M is a -algebra, and
(iii). m

|
M
: M [0, ] is a measure which extends m.
Corollary. For any measure m: A [0, ], there is an extension of m to
a measure on the -algebra M of all m-measurable sets.
Denition. Let m: A [0, ] be a measure where A is a ring of subsets
of a set X. We say that m is -nite if there are sets X
i
A with X
i
X
such that m(X
i
) < for i = 1, 2, . . . .
Theorem (Uniqueness of extensions for -nite measures).
For any -nite measure m: A [0, ], there is a unique extension of m
to a measure on the -algebra M of all m-measurable sets.
3
Lebesgue measure on R
Denition. The interval ring is the set I P(R),
I = {all nite unions of intervals of the form (a, b] where a, b R}.
Denition. The length measure m: I [0, ] is dened by
m((a
1
, b
1
] (a
2
, b
2
] (a
n
, b
n
]) = b
1
a
1
+ b
2
a
2
+ . . . +b
n
a
n
where a
1
< b
1
< a
2
< b
2
< < a
n
< b
n
.
no proof Theorem. The length measure m: I [0, ] is a (well-dened) -nite
measure.
Denition. Let m: I [0, ] be the length measure.
A set B R is Lebesgue measurable if it is m-measurable.
Let M denote the collection of all Lebesgue measurable sets.
Lebesgue measure m: M [0, ] is the measure obtained by extending
the length measure to the -algebra M of Lebesgue measurable sets using
the Extension Theorem.
For the rest of this section, we will write m for Lebesgue measure and M
for the collection of all Lebesgue measurable sets.
Proposition. Let A M and c R.
(i). m(A +c) = m(A) [m is translation invariant], and
(ii). m(cA) = |c|m(A).
no proof Theorem. There is a subset of R which is not Lebesgue measurable.
Denition. Let S P(R) be any collection of subsets of R.
The -algebra generated by S is
(S) =

_
A P(R): A is a -algebra and S A
_
Proposition. (S) is the smallest -algebra of subsets of R which
contains S. That is,
(i). (S) is a -algebra and S (S), and
(ii). If B P(R) is any -algebra with S B then (S) B.
Denition. The collection of Borel subsets of R is dened to be (O)
where O is the collection of open subsets of R.
Theorem. The collection of Borel subsets of R is equal to (I). So
I (I) = (O) M P(R).
Theorem. For any Lebesgue measurable set A M, there is a Borel set B
with A B and m(B \ A) = 0.
4
Integration with respect to a measure
Denition. A measure space consists of a set X, a -algebra M P(X)
and a measure m: M [0, ].
Let us x a measure space (X, M, m). We refer to the sets in M as
measurable sets.
Denition. A function f : X [, ] is measurable if the set
f
1
(, ] = {x X: f(x) > }
is in M for every R.
Denition. If A X then the characteristic function of A is the function

A
: X R dened by

A
(x) =
_
1 if x A,
0 if x A.
Proposition. If f, g : X [, ] are two measurable functions, A M
is a measurable set and c [, ], then f +g, f
A
and cf are all
measurable functions.
Denition. A function : X R is simple if the range of is a nite
set.
Proposition. Let : X R be a simple function. There is a partition
X = A
1
A
n
of X and a
1
, . . . , a
n
R with a
i
= a
j
if i = j such that
= a
1

1
+ +a
n

n
. ()
Apart from re-ordering, there is only one way to write in this form.
Moreover, is measurable if and only if each set A
1
, . . . , A
n
is measurable.
Denition. If : X [0, ) is a nonnegative, simple measurable function
written in the form () then the integral of with respect to m is
dened as
_
dm = a
1
m(A
1
) + +a
n
m(A
n
).
If A is a measurable set then
A
is a nonnegative, simple measurable
function, so we can dene the integral of over A with respect to m by
_
A
dm =
_

A
dm.
Proposition. If A is any measurable set then
_

A
dm = m(A).
5
Proposition. If c [0, ) and , : X [0, ) are nonnegative, simple
measurable functions then
(i). + is nonnegative, simple and measurable, and
_
+ dm =
_
dm+
_
dm, and
(ii). c is nonnegative, simple and measurable, and
_
cdm = c
_
dm.
Theorem. If : X [0, ) is a nonnegative, simple measurable function
then the map : M [0, ],
(A) =
_
A
dm, for A M
is a measure.
Corollary. Let : X [0, ) be a nonnegative, simple measurable
function. Let A M and A
n
M for n = 1, 2, . . . , with A
n
A. Then
_
A
n
dm
_
A
dm as n .
Denition. Let f : X [0, ] be a nonnegative measurable function. The
integral of f with respect to m is dened as
_
f dm = sup
_
_
dm:
: X [0, ) is a nonnegative, simple
measurable function with 0 f
_
.
If A is a measurable set then f
A
is a nonnegative measurable function, so
we can dene the integral of f over A with respect to m by
_
A
f dm =
_
f
A
dm.
Proposition. Let f and g be nonnegative measurable functions X [0, ]
and let A, B M.
(i). If f g then
_
f dm
_
g dm.
(ii). If A B then
_
A
f dm
_
B
f dm.
Denition. A sequence (f
n
)
n1
of functions f
n
: X [, ] is
monotone increasing if f
1
(x) f
2
(x) f
3
(x) . . . for every x X.
If f : X [, ], we write f = lim
n
f
n
or f
n
f as n if
f
n
(x) f(x) for every x X.
Proposition. Let (f
n
)
n1
be a monotone increasing sequence of functions
f
n
: X [, ].
(i). There is a function f : X [, ] with f = lim
n
f
n
.
(ii). If each f
n
is a measurable function, then so is f = lim
n
f
n
.
6
Theorem (The Monotone Convergence Theorem). If (f
n
)
n1
is a
monotone increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions
f
n
: X [0, ] then
_
lim
n
f
n
dm = lim
n
_
f
n
dm.
Theorem. Let f : X [0, ] be any nonnegative measurable function.
There is a monotone increasing sequence (
n
)
n1
of nonnegative, simple
measurable functions
n
: X [0, ) with f = lim
n

n
.
Corollary. (i). If f, g : X [0, ] are nonnegative measurable functions
and c 0 then f +g and cf are nonnegative measurable functions,
and
_
f +g dm =
_
f dm +
_
g dm and
_
cf dm = c
_
f dm.
(ii). If f
n
: X [0, ] are nonnegative measurable functions for n 1
then

n=1
f
n
is a nonnegative measurable function and
_

n=1
f
n
dm =

n=1
_
f
n
dm.
Corollary. If f : X [0, ) is a nonnegative measurable function then the
map : M [0, ],
(A) =
_
A
f dm, for A M
is a measure.
Corollary. Let f : X [0, ) be a nonnegative measurable function. Let
A
i
M for i = 1, 2, . . . .
(i). If A =

i=1
A
i
is a countable disjoint union then
_
A
f dm =

i=1
_
A
i
f dm.
(ii). If A
i
A then
_
A
i
f dm
_
A
f dm as i .
(iii). If A
i
A and
_
A
1
f dm < then
_
A
i
f dm
_
A
f dm as i .
7
Denition. A set A M is m-null , or null , if m(A) = 0.
Denition. Let f, g : X [, ] be measurable functions. We say that
f = g almost everywhere , or f = g a.e. if the set {x X: f(x) = g(x)}
is m-null.
Theorem. Let f : X [0, ] be a nonnegative measurable function. Then
_
f dm = 0 f = 0 almost everywhere.
Corollary. If A is an m-null set and f : X [0, ] is any nonnegative
measurable function then
_
A
f dm = 0.
Corollary. If f, g : X [0, ] are nonnegative measurable functions with
f = g almost everywhere, then
_
f dm =
_
g dm.
Theorem (An almost everywhere version of the MCT). If (f
n
)
n1
is a
monotone increasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions
f
n
: X [0, ] with f
n
f almost everywhere then
_
f dm = lim
n
_
f
n
dm.
Denition. If f : X R is a measurable function, we say f is
integrable with respect to m if
_
f
+
dm < and
_
f

dm <
where f
+
, f

: X [0, ) are the nonnegative measurable functions


f
+
(x) =
_
f(x) if f(x) 0
0 if f(x) < 0
and f

(x) =
_
f(x) if f(x) 0
0 if f(x) > 0
If f is integrable with respect to m, we dene the
integral of f with respect to m by
_
f dm =
_
f
+
dm
_
f

dm.
Proposition. If f
1
, f
2
: X [0, ) are measurable functions with
_
f
1
dm < and
_
f
2
dm < then the function f = f
1
f
2
is integrable
and
_
f dm =
_
f
1
dm
_
f
2
dm.
Corollary. If f, g : X R are integrable functions and c R then f +g
and cf are integrable with
_
f +g dm =
_
f dm +
_
g dm and
_
cf dm = c
_
f dm.
8
Theorem. If f, g : X R are integrable functions with f = g almost
everywhere then
_
f dm =
_
g dm.
Theorem. If f : X R is measurable then |f| is measurable and
(i). f is integrable |f| is integrable; and
(ii). if f is integrable then |
_
f dm|
_
|f| dm.
Denition. A complex-valued function f : X C is integrable if the
real-valued functions Re f and Imf are both integrable. If f is integrable,
the integral of f with respect to m is the complex number
_
f dm =
_
Re f dm +i
_
Imf dm.
Theorem. If f : X C is integrable then |
_
f dm|
_
|f| dm.
Denition. Let (a
n
)
n1
be a sequence in [, ]. The lim sup and
lim inf of this sequence are dened by
limsup
n
a
n
= lim
n
_
sup
in
a
i
_
and liminf
n
a
n
= lim
n
_
inf
in
a
i
_
.
Theorem (Fatous lemma). If (f
n
)
n1
is a sequence of nonnegative
measurable functions f
n
: X [0, ] then
_
liminf
n
f
n
dm liminf
n
_
f
n
dm.
Theorem (The Dominated Convergence Theorem). Suppose that (f
n
)
n1
is
a sequence of integrable functions f
n
: X R and that f
n
f as n .
If there is an integrable function g : X R with |f
n
| g for all n 1, then
f is integrable, and
_
f dm = lim
n
_
f
n
dm.
Theorem. Let (f
n
)
n1
be a sequence of integrable functions f
n
: X R so
that

n=1
|f
n
(x)| < for every x X and with

n=1
_
|f
n
| dm < .
Then
_

n=1
f
n
dm =

n=1
_
f
n
dm.
Theorem (Dierentiation under the integral sign). Let f : X [a, b] R
be a function so that
(i). for each t [a, b], x f(x, t) is an integrable function X R; and
(ii). for each x X, t f(x, t) is a dierentiable function [a, b] R; and
(iii). for some integrable g : X R we have

f
t
(x, t)

g(x)
for every t [a, b] and x X.
Then
d
dt
_
f(x, t) dx =
_
f
t
(x, t) dx
9
Lebesgue integration on R
Denition. The Lebesgue integral is the integral with respect to
Lebesgue measure m: M R where M is the collection of Lebesgue
measurable subsets of R. In other words, integrals with respect to m are
dened by applying the preceding theory to the measure space (R, M, m)
where M and m are the Lebesgue measurable subsets of R, and Lebesgue
measure on R, respectively. For a b, well write
_
b
a
f(x) dx =
_
a
b
f(x) dx instead of
_
(a,b)
f dm
Proposition. For any a, b, c R and any integrable function f : R R,
_
b
a
f(x) dx +
_
c
b
f(x) dx =
_
c
a
f(x) dx.
Theorem (The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus). Let a R, let
f : R R be continuous and let F(t) =
_
t
a
f(x) dx for t R. Then
F

(t) = f(t) for all t R.


Corollary. If G: R R is continuously dierentiable and a, b R then
_
b
a
G

(x) dx = G(b) G(a).


Corollary. If a, b, c, d R and u and f are functions [a, b]
u
[c, d]
f
R
with u continuously dierentiable and f continuous, then
_
b
a
f(u(x)) u

(x) dx =
_
u(b)
u(a)
f(y) dy.
Theorem. Let f : R R be an integrable function and let c R.
(i).
_
f(x +c) dx =
_
f(x) dx
(ii). If c = 0 then
_
f(cx) dx =
1
|c|
_
f(x) dx.
10
Multiple integration
Let (X, L, ) and (Y, M, m) be measure spaces. We will write
_
f(x) d(x) =
_
f d and
_
g(y) dm(y) =
_
g dm
whenever the expressions on the right hand side make sense.
Denition. If A L and B M then the set A B is called a
rectangle . We write rect(L, M) = {A B: A L, B M} for the set of
all rectangles. We also write
A
rect
(L, M) = {all nite unions of rectangles A B rect(L, M)}.
Proposition. A
rect
(L, M) is a ring of subsets of X Y , and every element
of A
rect
(L, M) is a nite disjoint union of rectangles from rect(L, M).
Denition. If E A
rect
(L, M) with E =

i=1
A
i
B
i
is a disjoint union
(possibly with A
i
B
i
= for i suciently large) then we dene
(E) =

i1
(A
i
)m(B
i
).
Theorem. : A
rect
(L, M) [0, ] is a well-dened measure.
Denition. The product -algebra of the -algebras L and M is
L M = (A
rect
(L, M)).
The product measure of the measures and m is l m =

|
LM
, the
restriction of the outer measure

to L M.
Since L M is contained in the -measurable subsets of X Y , the
Extension Theorem shows that m is a measure.
Monotone classes
Denition. Let X be a set. A monotone class of subsets of X is a
non-empty collection C P(X) which is closed under increasing unions and
decreasing intersections:
(i). if A
n
C and A
n
A for some A X, then A C; and
(ii). if A
n
C then and A
n
A for some A X then A C.
If S P(X) is a non-empty collection of subsets of X, we write mon(S)
for the smallest monotone class of subsets of X which contains S.
11
Proposition. (i). A non-empty collection of subsets of X which is closed
under increasing unions and complements is a monotone class.
(ii). Any -algebra is a monotone class.
(iii). S mon(S) (S) for any non-empty collection S of subsets of X.
no proof Theorem (Monotone class lemma). If A P(X) is a ring of subsets of X
then mon(A) is also a ring of subsets of X.
Corollary. Let A be a ring of subsets of a set X. If X mon(A) then
mon(A) = (A).
Corollary. L M = mon(A
rect
(L, M)).
Integration using product measure
Denition. Let E X Y . For x X and y Y , we write
E
x
= {y Y : (x, y) E} and E
y
= {x X: (x, y) E}.
Theorem. If E L M then E
x
M for every x X, and E
y
L for
every y Y .
no proof Theorem. Let l and m be -nite measures and let E L M.
(i). Both of the functions X [0, ], x m(E
x
) and
Y [0, ], y m(E
y
) are measurable.
(ii). l m(E) =
_
X
m(E
x
) dl(x) =
_
Y
l(E
y
) dm(y).
Theorem (Tonellis theorem). If F : X Y [0, ] is a nonnegative
measurable function then
_
X
_
_
Y
F(x, y) dm(y)
_
dl(x) =
_
XY
F d(lm) =
_
Y
_
_
X
F(x, y) dl(y)
_
dm(x).
[In particular, all of the functions that must be measurable for these
integrals to be dened, are measurable!]
Theorem (Fubinis theorem). If F : X Y R is integrable then
_
X
_
_
Y
F(x, y) dm(y)
_
dl(x) =
_
XY
F d(lm) =
_
Y
_
_
X
F(x, y) dl(y)
_
dm(x).
Here, the integral
_
Y
F(x, y) dm(y) is dened for almost every x X,
and x
_
Y
F(x, y) dm(y) is integrable.
Similarly, the integral
_
X
F(x, y) dl(x) is dened for almost every y Y ,
and y
_
X
F(x, y) dl(x) is integrable.
12
Lebesgue measure and integration on R
n
Denition. Let (R, M, m) be the usual Lebesgue measure space, as on
page 10. Lebesgue measure on R
2
is the measure
mm: MM [0, ]. We obtain a corresponding integral from the
measure space (R
2
, MM, mm).
Similarly, we dene Lebesgue measure on R
n
by
m m: M M [0, ], and obtain a corresponding integral
from the measure space (R
n
, M M, m m).
If f : R
n
R is integrable then we write
_
R
n
f(x) dx
for the integral of f with respect to Lebesgue measure on R
n
.
We have the following generalisation of the nal theorem on page 10:
Theorem. Let A be an invertible n n matrix with real entries. If
f : R
n
R is integrable then
_
R
n
f(Ax) dx =
1
| det A|
_
R
n
f(x) dx.
Corollary. Let A be any n n matrix with real entries and let
= m m denote Lebesgue measure on R
n
. If S R
n
is a Lebesgue
measurable and we write A(S) = {Ax: x S} then
(A(S)) = | det A|(S).
13

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy