Oncology Ward Teaching - Assessed Clinical Clerking: How The Session Works

ONCOLOGY WARD TEACHING ASSESSED CLINICAL CLERKING
How the session works 9.30 Meet your tutor outside the Oncology Seminar Room and you will each be given the name and a few basic facts about a patient. Then, without the aid of the medical notes, you have 60 minutes to take a history and perform a full examination of the patient.
10.30 Meet back at the seminar room and each of you will formally present your case to the tutor 11.30 The group will go with the tutor, to each of the patients, and the student who clerked that patient will perform a system examination with abnormal findings e.g. respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculo-skeletal or neurological.
12.15 Return to seminar room for feedback.
This session will be assessed by the tutor and by yourself to try and allow you to identify areas of your clinical clerking, which require further practice . The marking scheme is an adaptation of the Structured Clinical Examination Exercise form and a marking proforma, which is now used in Finals. This is a formative assessment, not summative and does not count towards your examination mark. In order to investigate the best methods of tutor and student assessment we will be collecting in the forms at the end of this session. So we can match the two assessments, we would like you to write your matriculation number on the forms. The information will solely be used for this purpose, and of course kept confidential. If you would like to keep a hard copy of the form please ask your tutor to arrange a photocopy.
Matric. No. ______________________ Tutor marking scheme Presentation of case

CRITERIA Must improve (comment) Satisfactory
History of presenting complaint Current symptoms / problems Past medical history
Comprehensive Clearly presented in logical order Clearly presented with exacerbating/ relieving factors
Comprehensive Important negatives noted All drugs noted including indications and potential problems Home situation Social services Potential problems Comprehensive
Medications
Social history
Elicits patients ideas, concerns & expectations Systemic enquiry
All systems covered and important negatives noted
Examination findings Summary of case
Presented clearly and in logical sequence Delivered in clear concise manner, with all relevant facts
Matric. No. ______________________
CLINICAL JUDGEMENT DECISION MAKING

Diagnostic summary safe, logical differential diagnosis gives good reasons for differential diagnosis and provisional diagnosis chooses appropriate specific Ix and defends choice
Must improve (comment)
Satisfactory
CLINICAL EXAMINATION based on clinical findings

Introduction Management
Investigations
Must improve (comment)
Satisfactory
Information gathering:
greets patient, describes comprehensive plan introduces self and role, emphasis on safe practice obtains takes all consent findings and other given information into consideration examines in logical sequence seeks all appropriate signs uses standard techniques can list further relevant clinical examination shows genuine interest and concern responds sensitively to patients feelings and situation Gives clear logical summary of clinical findings
Rapport and empathy Reporting
Matric. No. ______________________ What was strongest element of the casepresentation / examination?
What was the weakest element?
How could presentation / examination be improved?
What mark would you give the student? Poor Pass Good Very Good Excellent
Overall comment _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Do you have any feedback on this session you would like to give to the organisers? _________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________
STUDENT SELF-APPRAISAL FORM FOR ONCOLOGY ASSESSED CLERKING Matric. No. ______________________ This is for you to complete at the end of the session before you have seen the tutors comments. We would like to collect these at the end of the session so that we can analyse staff versus student appraisal to try and improve our procedures so that they are most informative to both parties. Obviously this information will be kept confidential. If you are concerns please discuss with Dr Erridge. If you would like to retain a copy of this feedback please ask you tutor who will arrange a photocopy for you. How do you think you did today? Poor Pass Good Very good Excellent
What was your strongest element of the casepresentation / examination?
What was the weakest element?
How could your performance be improved?
Overall comment
______________________________________________________________ Do you have any feedback youd like to give to the organisers of this session? _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________

Oncology Ward Teaching - Assessed Clinical Clerking: How The Session Works

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Oncology Ward Teaching - Assessed Clinical Clerking: How The Session Works

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Oncology Ward Teaching - Assessed Clinical Clerking: How The Session Works

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ONCOLOGY WARD TEACHING ASSESSED CLINICAL CLERKING

12.15 Return to seminar room for feedback.

Matric. No. ______________________ Tutor marking scheme Presentation of case

History of presenting complaint Current symptoms / problems Past medical history

Elicits patients ideas, concerns & expectations Systemic enquiry

All systems covered and important negatives noted

Examination findings Summary of case

Matric. No. ______________________

CLINICAL JUDGEMENT DECISION MAKING

Must improve (comment)

CLINICAL EXAMINATION based on clinical findings

Must improve (comment)

Rapport and empathy Reporting

What was the weakest element?

How could presentation / examination be improved?

What was your strongest element of the casepresentation / examination?

What was the weakest element?

How could your performance be improved?

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.