Point of Care Diagnostics
Point of Care Diagnostics
Point of Care Diagnostics
6707 Democracy Blvd, Ste 200, Bethesda, MD 20892 301-451-4772 301-480-4973 (F) info@nibib.nih.gov www.nibib.nih.gov
Agenda
Speaker Abstracts
- 9 -
- 10 -
- 11 -
- 12 -
Point-of-Care Testing for ACS, Heart Failure, and Drug Overdose in the
Emergency Room
Kenneth F. Buechler, Joseph Anderberg, Steve Lesefko, Kevin Nakamura, Paul McPherson Biosite, Inc., San Diego, CA Patients who present to the emergency departments with life-threatening conditions require immediate attention to improve outcomes and save lives. We have developed a point-of-care (POC) immunoassay system, the Triage Meter system, which measures peptides, proteins, and small molecules in about 15 minutes. The Triage system comprises a portable battery-powered fluorometer, the Triage Meter, and a protein chip, the Triage device. The protein chip can measure single biomarkers or multiple biomarkers simultaneously. To perform the tests, the user adds several drops of EDTA anti-coagulated whole blood, plasma, or urine to the device and inserts it into the Triage Meter. The device incorporates novel concepts of capillarity and defined surface architectures to drive and control fluid flow during the immunoassay. The fluorescent label comprises two phthalocyanine derivatives incorporated into microparticles at concentrations that allow the dyes to exhibit fluorescence energy transfer. The donor dye is excited at 670 nm and the acceptor dye fluoresces at 760 nm. The concentrations of the biomarkers are read from the meter display or they can be printed. The markers comprising a panel are selected in a discovery phase to optimize the ROC curve area of a diagnostic or prognostic condition. The MultiMarker Index (MMX) will be described and is a single value calculated from an algorithm derived from clinical data. The MMX is the summation of the products of the marker concentration transfer functions, and weighting factors. The Triage CardioProfilER is a panel of markers comprising B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin I and complexes, CKMB and myoglobin. Data will be presented relating to the diagnostic and prognostic performance of the panel and on the performance of the panel utilizing MMX when myeloperoxidase and a new, undisclosed marker are added, and compared to troponin I.
- 13 -
- 14 -
- 15 -
- 16 -
- 17 -
- 18 -
- 19 -
- 20 -
Medical Information Bus Concepts for Collecting Clinical Patient Data From the Intensive Care Unit and Other Acutely Ill Patients
Reed M. Gardner, David K. Vawdrey Department of Medical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT Gathering and recording patient data is a fundamental responsibility of all care providers, be they physicians, physician assistants, nurses, medical records clerks, geneticists, laboratory technologists, etc. In todays world of electronic health records (EHRs) and computer-assisted decision-support technologies, gathering and recording structured and coded data into a machineunderstandable format is even more crucial. However, converting a medical care culture that has been trained with handwritten, paper-based record systems continues to be a challenge. Gathering quantitative and structured data at times requires more time and effort for caregivers than just handwriting a shorthand note. Therefore, it is crucial that we optimize gathering at point of care from devices and instruments. Over two decades ago, the problem of having nurses read data from bedside patient monitors in intensive care units (ICUs) and hand keying them into a computerized record was recognized. As a consequence, the Medical Information Bus (MIB) also known as IEEE 1073 was developed. Using the MIB standard, data from bedside monitors, IV pumps, ventilators, and bedside laboratory testing devices are now collected automatically. With the MIB, ICU patient data-gathering is more timely, accurate, and efficient. As more data are collected from patients in the home, clinic, or other outpatient settings, technologies similar to the MIB should be developed to allow integration of a patients data independent of where the patient is physically located. Today, many patients have blood pressure measurement instruments, blood glucose meters, and other devices at home. In the future, even more instruments will be developed that will allow much of the patients data to be collected automatically. Using these automated point-of-care modalities to optimize patient benefit will require automated gathering of these data independent of where a patient is located. Lessons learned using the MIB in the ICU will be described.
- 21 -
Paul G. Biondich Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN One of the most challenging aspects of providing health care in resource-constrained environments is finding efficient, workflow-friendly mechanisms to collect clinical data. We will describe two clinical environments, a high-volume urban pediatric outpatient clinic and an HIV clinic in sub-Saharan Africa, and how successful data collection implementations were built by tailoring solutions to workflows. We will also discuss specific issues that both of these implementations now face as they scale up.
- 22 -
- 23 -
- 24 -
- 25 -
- 26 -
- 27 -
- 28 -
- 29 -
- 30 -
Paul DOrazio Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA From the IVD industry perspective, there are several considerations when developing new technology/devices for point-of-care testing (POCT). Technology Assessment. Collaboration between industry and academia is an attractive way to move promising new technologies from the research laboratory to commercialization. Beyond proof of concept, there are important requirements for a successful technology transfer from academia to industry. Primary among these is early demonstration that the technology/device is manufacturable in a desired format (e.g., unit use disposable, reusable device, etc.) in a costeffective manner. Regulatory Considerations. All testing sites performing POCT are subject to the CLIA 1988 requirements for quality control testing and are inspected to determine compliance. These can be burdensome requirements for POCT locations, whose primary function is patient care. In response to user needs, manufacturers have developed embedded quality control systems for POCT systems, to replace testing of external control materials. Although proven effective in mitigating risk, many of these alternative quality control schemes are not in compliance with current regulations, presenting an obstacle to implementation. Acceptance of manufacturerrecommended QC programs would require a collaborative effort between manufacturers, end users, and regulatory agencies, and a reassessment of the current regulations. Understanding and Meeting User Requirements. Users have indicated that the most important factors in point-of-care instrument selection and implementation are (1) reliability, (2) ability to use whole blood as the sample (if whole blood is the applicable sample type), and (3) data transfer capability to the LIS/HIS (see reference). Reliability may include analytical performance of POC systems equivalent to traditional systems found in the core laboratory (for quantitative testing), fool-proof system performance in the hands of nonlaboratory personnel, and requirements for little or no instrument maintenance and downtime. POCT for in vitro diagnostics is an expanding delivery option because of increased pressure for faster test results. From the end-user perspective, POCT should not simply be used as a replacement for the central laboratory without evaluation of the effect of a faster result on patient care. To this end, the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry has published guidelines that state, The value of POCT really needs to be demonstrated through well-designed randomized control trials. The same guideline concludes that such studies, linking POCT to improved patient outcomes, are generally lacking in the clinical literature. Any support to the end-users from industry, funding agencies, etc. in developing this type of evidence would provide real impetus to the growth of point-of-care testing. Reference 2004 US Hospitals Point-of-Care Survey, Enterprise Analysis Corp., Stamford, CT, November 2004.
- 31 -
GE Healthcare Clinical Systems, Milwaukee, WI; 2Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland The point-of-care nature of patient monitors that obtain and display physiologic information at the bedside is self-evident. The direction it will take is less obvious. While noninvasive methods for obtaining physiologic information will continue to be pursued, the industry will likely acknowledge that many monitoring modalities will probably best be solved in a minimally invasive manner. Currently, traditional monitoring focuses on cardiovascular, respiratory, and, more recently, neurological systems. Advances in techniques of biochemical real-time or periodic analysis will open a new view into disease processes. Being mindful of parameter-level artifact rejection and data quality indices, the integration of traditional monitoring and biochemical analysis into information systems becomes realizable. These pieces all exist and can be brought together for meaningful improvements in patient care. The genuine academic cross-disciplinary collaboration between researchers of industry, universities, and hospitals is an essential basis for all the success stories in this endeavor. How this works in practice varies country by country partly because of differences in regulatory and legal systems and partly because of cultural and health care system differences. In countries like Finland, government actively supports this kind of collaboration with financing schemes that can be either industry or university driven. Major companies have their internal research groups that talk the same language as academic groups. The only issues related to collaboration are around the intellectual property rights and ownership of results. Keeping these under control requires continuous involvement of well-informed and cooperative legal people for navigating between different interests of the teams: publish or perish versus patent or perish!
- 32 -
- 33 -
- 34 -
- 35 -
- 36 -
Center for Devices and Radiological Health Review Practice for Point-of-Care Devices: A Diagnostic Perspective
Arleen F. Pinkos Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD There are many things to think about when developing a product to be used for medical purposes, Federal regulations being just one of them. Most medical devices must be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they may be marketed. Although each device is unique, there are common elements considered by FDA while reviewing every type of product. Whether a device is simple in design or employs a more complex noninvasive or lab-on a-chip technology, the types of studies and other requirements are similar. Understanding the Code of Federal Regulations, the processes employed, and the resources available will help innovative technologies reach the public faster. Topics that will be discussed include the driving force of a review, how to demonstrate that a device is safe and effective, how a point-of-care claim affects study requirements, the importance of human factors and risk mitigation, unique considerations, and the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA).
- 37 -
- 38 -
- 39 -
General Abstracts
Zoraida P. Aguilar Vegrandis, LLC, Fayetteville, AR We report our efforts toward the development of automated, rapid, sensitive, portable, low-cost, and reliable bioassays with electrochemical detection for medical applications that relies on our technology involving a chip that contains an array of 16-picoliter geometric volume microcavities with self-contained electrochemistry. The 50-m diameter (with a depth of 8 m) microcavity has embedded microelectrodes along its wall and bottom (with the bottom recessed microdisk electrode or RMD at 2 x 10-5 cm2 and the wall tubular nanoband electrode or TNB at 8 x 10-8 cm2) [1]. The microelectrodes in the cavity exhibit lower background signals and zeptomole detection limits. When the RMD is converted into a capture surface, the 4-m distance to the TNB detecting electrode provides close proximity for a rapid response showing the first signal to be recorded within 30 seconds of enzyme substrate incubation in our mouse IgG studies [2]. The self-contained nature of the microcavity allows for a small volume of samples and reagents down to 200 nL in the unoptimized studies for mouse IgG. It is possible to use reagent volumes as low as the 16-picoliter geometric volume of the microcavity if evaporation can be eliminated. Our goal is to develop the microcavities into self-contained microelectrochemical lab-on-a-chip (LOC) assay platforms that will integrate the high specificity of selected antibodies and DNA and the sensitivity of the microelectrodes in the microcavity. The self-contained microelectrochemical LOC assay can detect either in a single analyte or multiple analytes in an array assay format by using monoclonal antibodies or capture probes to different analytes for the detection of multiple analytes from a single sample. Initial research on the application of our technology for the detection of antibody to protective antigen (anti-PA IgG) from Bacillus anthracis will be discussed. Using the TNB microelectrode inside the 50-m diameter microcavity on a chip as the detecting electrode, we have detected as low as 50 ng/mL anti-PA IgG in an ~30-minute total assay time from capture to signal generation. We will also present our preliminary results in the detection and quantitation of the pathogen Plasmodium falciparum, which is one of the causes of 300-500 million cases of malaria worldwide. Using the TNB microelectrode inside the 50-m diameter microcavity on a chip as the detecting electrode, we have detected as low as 2 ng/mL CSP protein in an immunoassay and 1 ng/mL CSP DNA repeat sequence in a DNA-hybridization assay that were carried out in a streptavidin-coated 96-well plate [3]. We will include preliminary results on the solid phaseimmunoassay capture of ovarian cancer biomarker TADG 14 on 1.44 cm2 gold-coated silicon wafer chips detected electrochemically using our technology. We will describe efforts toward portability and automation that will allow use in clinics, hospitals, and research laboratories. We will include advantages of our technology over existing techniques.
- 41 -
References 1. Henry, C., Fritsch, I. (1999) Microfabricated recessed microdisk electrodes: Characterization in static and convective solutions. Anal Chem 71:550-556. 2. Aguilar, Z.P., Vandaveer, W.R., Fritsch, I. (2002) Self-contained microelectrochemical immunoassay for small volumes using mouse IgG as a model system. Anal Chem 74:3321 3329. 3. Aguilar, Z.P. (2006) Small volume detection of Plasmodium falciparum CSP gene using a 50-m diameter cavity with self-contained electrochemistry. Anal Chem Web Release Date:10-Jan-2006; (Article) DOI: 10.1021/ac051450i.
- 42 -
Smart Point-of-Care Diagnostic System for Patient Monitoring at Home or the Emergency Room
Chong H. Ahn1,2, Brian Gibler3, Edward Jauch3, Aniruddha Puntambekar4
1 3
Microsystems and BioMEMS Laboratory, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; 4Siloam Biosciences LLC, Cincinnati, OH Recently, the BioMEMS team of the University of Cincinnati has developed an innovative, fully integrated, smart point-of-care (POC) diagnostic system for the dual applications of a fully stand-alone diagnostic kit and a hand-held point-of-care diagnostic system. The smart point-of care diagnostic system has sampling/identifying capabilities for the fast and reliable measurements of metabolic parameters or diagnostics of specific biomarkers from a human body with minimum invasion. The smart POC diagnostic system, which adopts the concept of a smart plastic lab-on-a-chip, is capable of multiparameter monitoring and also able to complete the whole sampling and analysis autonomously in less than 2 minutes. The clinical tests are grouped into synergistic sets, where the collective information from all the tests will provide a comprehensive overview of the patients condition. The core functions of the smart diagnostic system can be performed by an array of smart labs-on-chips (LOCs), with each programmed for diagnosing a specific clinically relevant target. The smart derives from the protocols where no patient intervention is required (after sampling) and the test protocol is completely autonomous. This smart POC testing can provide a revolutionary leap in patient management to move diagnostic clinical tests from a centralized laboratory to the home environment. This approach will dramatically enhance a physicians ability to provide immediate and appropriate care to patients using reliable, quantitative, clinically relevant data. This work envisions significant advances in public health due to the reduced turnaround time, fewer hospital visits, and regular convenient monitoring at home for the elderly and chronically ill. In this presentation, an overview of the recent research achievements for the smart POC diagnostic system for blood analysis will be presented, discussing the relevant issues to the smart polymer lab-on-a-chip, protein assays, clinical diagnostics, and home care portals for the emergency care or patient monitoring at home.
- 43 -
- 44 -
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA; 2University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Davis, CA In public health laboratories and hospitals, there is an urgent need for convenient, accurate, and easy-to-use point-of-care diagnostic tools. Standard laboratory culture and analysis often require days for definitive results; thus, primary-care physicians who treat acutely ill patients must make educated guesses based on the clinical setting, the patients signs, and reported symptoms. In collaboration with the University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has developed, tested, evaluated, and piloted a point-of care diagnostic instrument (FluIDx) and multiplexed nucleic acid-based (PCR) assay for detection of influenza and other high-priority pathogens. The FluIDx instrument consists of an automated reagent delivery system, a flow-through PCR module, and a Luminex flow cytometer for processing and identifying both respiratory pathogens and biothreat agents. The multiplexed assay panel currently screens for influenza A, influenza B, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and adenovirus. Additional assays are under development and the panel is being continuously updated. No special sample preparation is necessary, and the current instrument accepts nasal swabs or nasal washes. Each sample requires ~2.5 hours to process. The system is easy to use, requiring no special skills or elaborate training to run the integrated software or interpret the results. The first version of the FluIDx instrument processes samples sequentially. This design will be modified in later versions to accommodate asynchronous sample preparation and processing.
- 45 -
The NanoCytometer:
A New Method of Determining Cell Size and
Performing Nanoscale Cell Separation at the Point of Care
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Introduction: We have developed a new method of determining cell size and of separating cells, named NanoCytometry. This system uses an artificial pore with an integrated microfluidic chip and nano-based electronics. Our system offers the opportunity to provide point-of-care service, because it permits label-free, direct signal detection, extreme rapidity, analysis using few cells, and ease of use. Methods: The NanoCytometer is fabricated with well-established lithographic techniques and uses the resistive-pulse technique to size cells: a cell passing through the pore displaces media, leading to a transient decrease in current, or pulse. Pulse magnitude correlates with cell size, and pulse width corresponds to cell flow rate. To achieve molecular specificity, we functionalize the pores inner walls with proteins, such as annexin V or an antibody, which interact with cells passing through the pore, thus performing an apoptosis assay or immunophenotyping, respectively. Results: Unfunctionalized, our pore detects cell populations differing in diameter by 0.5 m. Functionalized, the device distinguishes cells on the basis of surface marker expression. We have developed two apoptosis assays: (1) an indirect assay, in which apoptotic cells labeled with annexin V flow through a pore functionalized with an anti-annexin V antibody, and (2) a direct assay, in which unlabeled apoptotic cells flow through a pore functionalized with annexin V. In addition, we have functionalized the pore with antibodies to perform immunophenotyping of murine leukemia cells. Conclusions: Our NanoCytometer determines cell size and detects cell surface marker expression very accurately and could be incorporated into a handheld instrument that could use a few drops of blood to (1) measure a complete blood count using an unfunctionalized pore and (2) perform immunophenotyping for acute leukemias using functionalized pores arranged in series. The NanoCytometer could be used at the point of care to improve patients quality of life and disease assessment.
- 46 -
Nurses in the paper-based system use self-designed paper-based worksheets to take reports of their patients during shift change. They write key patient information (e.g., name, diagnosis, problems, and test results) while listening to shift reports recorded in a tape recorder. With a workload of five to eight patients, each nurse can spend at least 30 minutes for shift reports before starting to care for assigned patients. The iCare Worksheet was developed through a collaborative effort among the School of Nursing, the Department of Computer Technology, and a local hospital nursing staff to improve the efficiency of shift reports. The iCare Worksheet, loaded in the Pocket PC and desktop computer, simulates nurses daily work processes and keeps track of patient condition and care activities. The iCare Worksheet has pull-down menus with text, voice, and handwriting note-taking features to reduce handwriting data entry. It has alarm features to remind nurses to perform certain tasks. The interface program can retrieve patient information from the mainframe (SMS) to a desktop computer at a specified regular interval. Whenever Pocket PCs are synchronized with the desktop computer, updated SMS patient information is transferred from desktop computer to the iCare Worksheet. A pilot study was conducted for 1 month in August 2004. Nurses of one unit in a local hospital used the iCare Worksheet loaded in the Pocket PC for patient care and shift report. The presenters will show the functions of the iCare Worksheet in the Pocket PC, report nurses' perceptions of benefits and problems in using the iCare Worksheet, and make suggestions for future development.
- 47 -
Douglas A. Christensen2, Lyndon Tan1, Jacob D. Durtschi2, Samuel Tolley2, Hsu-Kun Wang1, Alan H. Terry1, Mark E. Astill3, Richard S. Smith2, James N. Herron1,2
1
Department of Pharmaceutics, 2Department of Bioengineering, 3ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT The triage procedure for chest-pain patients in an emergency room often includes the measurement of plasma concentrations of cTnI, CK-MB, and myoglobin as indicators of acute myocardial infarction. Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) is an ideal technology for such point-of-care (POC) testing because of its inherent high sensitivity and rapid assay speed. In TIRF assays, an optical substrate (such as a planar waveguide) immobilizes capture antibodies to specifically detect these analytes. The evanescent wave generated by the substrate will detect only those analytes (tagged with a fluorescently labeled second antibody) that bind to the capture antibodies, thereby eliminating a wash step. Over the past 15 years, our laboratory has developed planar waveguide biosensors based on TIRF. The following attributes of these biosensors make them uniquely well suited for in vitro diagnostics in POC settings: (1) low picomolar assay sensitivity, (2) short assay times (5-10 minutes), (3) simple assay protocol, (4) multiple, simultaneous assays on a single patient sample, (5) no sample preparation, and 6) inexpensive disposable assay cartridge. We report on the development of a system that uses 25x25x0.5-mm molded plastic planar waveguides as the binding substrate. Red light from a diode laser (635 nm) is formed into a sheet beam and coupled into the waveguide via an integrated lens. Fluorescence emission near 670 nm is collected and imaged by a cooled (-25 C) CCD camera equipped with an f/2.8 lens and an optical bandpass filter. The rate of binding of the analytes is determined by a nonlinear least squares fit to the time-varying detected fluorescence intensity during the initial 5 minutes of binding. A small-scale clinical study (62, 27, and 175 subjects) demonstrated that the assay exhibited good linearity with analytical sensitivities of 1.41 ng/mL, 5.64 ng/mL, and 0.2 ng/mL for CK-MB, myoglobin, and cTnI, respectively.
- 48 -
A Compact System for Multiplex Immunoassay Using Bio-functionalized Optically Coded Nanorods
George M. Dougherty1, Satinderpal S. Pannu1, Jeffrey B.-H. Tok1, Klint A. Rose1,2, Michael Sha3, Sharron Penn3
1
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA; 2Stanford University, Stanford, CA; 3 Nanoplex Technologies Inc., Menlo Park, CA We demonstrate new enabling technology for multiplex biodetection systems that are flexible, miniaturizable, highly automated, low cost, and high performance. The work builds on prior successes at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory with particle-based solution arrays, such as those used in the Autonomous Pathogen Detection System (APDS) successfully field deployed to multiple locations nationwide. We report the development of a multiplex solution array immunoassay based on engineered metallic nanorod particles. Nanobarcodes particles are fabricated by sequential electro-deposition of dissimilar metals within porous alumina templates, yielding optically encoded striping patterns that can be read using standard laboratory microscope optics and PC-based image processing software. The addition of self-assembled monolayer (SAM) coatings and target-specific antibodies allows each encoded class of nanorod particles to be directed against a different antigen target. A prototype assay panel directed against bacterial, viral, and soluble protein targets demonstrates simultaneous detection at sensitivities comparable to state-of-the-art immunoassays, with minimal cross-reactivity. Studies have been performed to characterize the colloidal properties (zeta potential) of the suspended nanorod particles as a function of pH, the ionic strength of the suspending solution, and surface functionalization state. Additional studies have produced means for the non-contact manipulation of the particles, including the insertion of magnetic nickel stripes within the encoding pattern, and control via externally applied electromagnetic fields. Using the results of these studies, the novel Nanobarcodes-based assay was implemented in a prototype automated system with the sample processing functions and optical readout performed on a microfluidic card. The unique physical properties of the nanorod particles enable the development of integrated microfluidic systems for biodefense, protein expression studies, and medical point-of-care applications.
- 49 -
- 50 -
Toward Large-Scale Integration of Microsystems for Ultrasensitive Real-Time Detection of Biological Entities
Amit Gupta1,2, M. Rameez Chatni1,2, Hung Chang1,2, Oguz Elibol1,2, Rashid Bashir1,2,3*
1
Birck Nanotechnology Center, 2School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN The Laboratory of Integrated Biomedical Micro/Nanotechnology and Applications (LIBNA) at Purdue University is currently engaged in diverse research projects, with the overall goal of large-scale integration of various biosensor modules onto a common microscale platform. This integration will involve microfluidic delivery of the reagents and analytes to the sensing elements, selective capture of the analytes using receptor molecules in conjunction with dielectrophoresis for active concentration to decrease the time of detection, as well as miniaturization of the overall system using nanosensors to make the microsystem portable, all key elements for point-of-care technologies. This abstract will focus on four current works being pursued to develop the biosensor elements: (1) Microsized cantilever beams have been demonstrated to be very sensitive resonant mass sensors, by scaling down the planar dimensions of the cantilever sensor to the microscale, with nanoscale thickness, and sensing the mass change due to a single, dry, vaccinia virus particle in air. (2) Electrical impedance-based biosensors for the measurement of the by-products of bacterial metabolism, in tandem with dielectrophoresis to concentrate and capture the bacteria into a volume chamber of size in the picoliter range, demonstrate an efficient and rapid method (as compared to the macroscale technique) for detecting the viability of a few bacterial cells. (3) Nanopore sensors (with the goal of sequencing DNA by means of translocating the molecule through the pore and obtaining an electrical signature corresponding to the base-pair sequence of the DNA) have reliably fabricated a silicon dioxide nanopore using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and monitoring the passage of the DNA through the pore from ionic current fluctuations. (4) With the realization that nanowire sensors (label-free, ultrasensitive biomolecular sensors having already been demonstrated in literature) will prove to be invaluable for diagnostics, our group is currently investigating two novel device schemes: silicon nanowire devices (with sub-20 nm diameter devices fabricated using top-down techniques) and silicon nanoplate devices.
*
- 51 -
Rapid Molecular Identification of Uropathogens in Clinical Urine Specimens Using an Electrochemical DNA Biosensor
David A. Haake2,8, Joseph C. Liao1, Mitra Mastali2, Vincent Gau3, Marc A. Suchard4,5, Annette K. Mller6, David A. Bruckner6, Jane T. Babbitt2, Yang Li1, Jeffrey Gornbein4, Elliot M. Landaw4, Edward R.B. McCabe7, Bernard M. Churchill1
1
Departments of Urology, 2Medicine, 4Biomathematics, 5Human Genetics, 6Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 7Pediatrics, 8David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 3GeneFluidics Inc., Monterey Park, CA; 8Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA We have achieved rapid, species-specific detection of bacterial pathogens in human clinical fluid samples using a microfabricated electrochemical sensor array. Each of the 16 sensors in the array consisted of three single-layer gold electrodesworking, reference, and auxiliary. Each of the working electrodes contained one representative from a library of capture probes with each specific for a clinically relevant bacterial urinary pathogen. The library included probes for E. coli, P. mirabilis, P. aeruginosa, Enterocococcus spp., and the Klebsiella-Enterobacter group. Bacterial 16S rRNA target derived from single-step bacterial lysis was hybridized to both the biotin-modified capture probe on the sensor surface, and a second, fluorescein-modified detector probe. Detection of the target-probe hybrids was achieved through binding of a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-fluorescein antibody to the detector probe. Amperometric measurement of the catalyzed HRP reaction was obtained at a fixed potential of 200 mV between the working and reference electrodes. 3-Fluorescein modification of the detector probe combined with continuity between the detector and capture probe hybridization sites significantly enhanced signal intensity and increased detection sensitivity by 25-fold compared to use of a 5-fluorescein-modified detector probe and a gap between the detector and capture probe hybridization sites. Species-specific detection of as few as 2,600 uropathogenic bacteria in culture, inoculated urine, and clinical urine samples was achieved within 30 minutes from the beginning of sample processing. In a feasibility study of this amperometric detection system using blinded clinical urine specimens, the sensor array had 100% sensitivity for direct detection of gram-negative bacteria without nucleic acid purification or amplification. Identification was demonstrated in 98% of gram-negative bacteria for which species-specific probes were available. When combined with a microfluidics-based sample preparation module, the integrated system would serve as a point-of-care device for rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infections.
- 52 -
- 53 -
The Case for Applying the Point-of-Care Testing Standard to Home Monitoring Devices
Mary Lou Ingeholm, Tang Ming-Jye Hu, Maggie Fang, Seong K. Mun, Betty A. Levine Imaging Science and Information Systems Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC Connectivity of home health care devices to clinical information systems remains an elusive target whose need is growing. At the core of the Point-of-Care Testing (POCT1-A) standard are three specifications describing the attributes of an Access Point (a unit to collect data from a testing device) and the communication protocol between the testing device and the access point; the Messaging Layer defining the protocol between the device and an Observation Reviewer (a data manager and analyzer); and the interface specification between the Observation Reviewer and clinical information systems. The vendor focus for compliance with POCT1-A has been on hospital POC devices like blood gas analyzers, but there is a clear need to extend the standard to home health care devices. Devices such as glucose meters, blood pressure cuffs, scales, etc. are currently available for home use by individuals with chronic diseases. As care of chronic diseases moves toward remote management, the need for standard device connectivity and integration with clinical information systems will only increase. Daily POCT of ones blood sugar using a glucose meter plays an integral role in managing diabetes. By integrating these self-monitoring devices with a centralized information system, both patients and providers can review the blood sugar readings remotely. Applications that facilitate diabetes management and support among patients and providers are most valuable if they capture data from all available blood glucose meters and deliver those data using various communication infrastructures. However, in the current proprietary environment, it is difficult to create an application that extracts data from all blood glucose meters and transmits those data effortlessly. This poster details our experiences developing a collaborative diabetes management system that demonstrates the immediate need for standardization of connectivity to blood glucose meters so that patients and providers can use the readings to improve diabetes control.
- 54 -
- 55 -
School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; 2Electrical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; 3Penn State University, State College, PA; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA Existing neurosurgical intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors can be used only in a hospital setting and have a limited useful lifespan because of drift and infection. Our work aims to develop a reliable and mass-producible MEMS-based microwave ICP sensor and a portable microwave monitor allowing long-term noninvasive monitoring of ICP. The device will be small enough to be inserted through a burr hole of 12-mm diameter, stable with no significant drift, biocompatible over the life of the patient, compatible with modern imaging (CT, MRI, ultrasound), and low-power consuming (CMOS technology). The core of this active implantable sensor is an oscillator operating at the Industrial-Scientific-Medical (ISM) band of 2.4000 2.4835 GHz. The LC components of the tank oscillator are selected to confine the range of oscillation to 2.4-2.4835 GHz, for the pressure range of -25 to 200 torr, which corresponds to about S = 0.37 MHz/torr sensitivity. The total DC current and consumed power are 11.5 mA and 34 mW, respectively. A prototype developed with a piezoresistive pressure sensor to monitor the signal transmission and biocompatibility was implanted in a pig. The results show predictable variation from in vitro studies in terms of pressure sensitivity. The device has a wireless range of 0.8 meter. The device is powered by a lithium rechargeable battery, 3V, 30mAh capacity. In a separate experiment, a laser of 830 nm wavelength, set at 140 mwatt illuminating an array of photodiodes generated a voltage of 5V across 500 ohms. With a phantom (slice of ham, 11 mm thick) between the laser and photodiodes, a transmission of 20% was observed. The laser-generated current can be used to recharge the battery. This project is funded by the National Institutes of Health, project number 1 R21 NS50590-01.
- 56 -
- 57 -
Digital Magnetofluidics
Solitaire A. Lindsay, Ana Egatz-Gomez, Sonia Melle, Antonio A. Garcia, Tom Picraux, Jennifer Taraci, Teresa Clement, Mark Hayes, Devens Gust Department of Optical Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Harrington Department of Bioengineering, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ We present a novel method to move and control drops of water on superhydrophobic surfaces through the use of magnetic fields. Small water drops (volume, 5-20 L) that contain lowvolume fractions of paramagnetic particles (less than 0.1%) can be moved on a superhydrophobic surface at relatively high speeds (7 cm/s) by displacing a permanent magnet. An aqueous drop pinned to a surface defect can be combined with another drop that contains paramagnetic particles, thus making it possible to move the newly formed drop. A drop can also be split using two magnetic fields. This new approach to microfluidics has the advantages of faster and more flexible control over drop movement and manipulation.
- 58 -
- 59 -
D. Malamud, C.A. Barber, G. Tong, Z. Chen, J. Wang, M. Mauk, R.S. Niedbala, H. Bau, P.L.A.M. Corstjens, W.R. Abrams New York University College of Dentistry; University of Pennsylvania School of Engineering; Lehigh University; and Leiden University Medical Center A major problem with current diagnostic paradigms is the time required between sample acquisition and informing the patient of the test results. If a sample could be analyzed on site with an immediate result, the individual could be counseled and/or appropriate therapy initiated. The goal of this study is to develop a rapid, accurate, and sensitive point-of-care diagnostic platform. Speed will be addressed by miniaturization, confirmatory by using simultaneous multiple testing strategies, and sensitivity by detection with unique up-converting phosphor technology (UPT) particles. Protocols for ELISA, and RT-PCR suitable for a microfluidic platform have been adapted to detect HIV and B. cereus, prototypical pathogens for proof of concept. The technology employs three interactive steps: (1) sample acquisition: collectors designed to pick up and release bacteria, soluble analytes, and virus from oral fluid, (2) microfluidic processing: the movement of microliter volumes of analyte using pneumatic or hydraulic forces, (3) detection of analytes utilizing UPT particles in an existing lateral-flow system, and (4) integrated software used for processing the results. The sensitive UPT technology is currently used to quantitate drugs of abuse, antibodies to pathogens, and nucleic acids. Monolithic polycarbonate chips have been constructed. We are developing an oral-based microscale diagnostic system that permits simultaneous analysis of HIV and B. cereus and/or other pathogen antigens and nucleic acids, as well as antibodies to these pathogens, thus enabling the diagnosis of multiple infectious diseases.
- 60 -
- 61 -
- 62 -
Optical integration and manipulation is a powerful technique that possesses great potential utility within microfluidic point-of-care (POC) diagnostic technologies. Conventional optics, however, are far too bulky and cumbersome for adaptation to portable formats. Through the use of conventional optics, we have overcome these traditional limitations and have created a class of microfluidic tools that can be combined into a single, versatile platform for POC testing. This platform is facilitated by several complementary technologies, specifically, (1) new techniques for the visualization and creation of micromachined structures (using femtosecond lasers) within microfluidic channels, (2) new optical trapping methods that overcome previous scaling limitations in microfluidics, and (3) integration of machined structures (optical waveguides) and optical trapping for detection and manipulation of biological bodies as they flow through microfluidic devices. We have demonstrated the applicability of these tools to whole blood cytometry, coagulation analysis, and cell sorting, for instance.
- 63 -
- 64 -
Department of Electrical Engineering and National Center for Space Biological Technologies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; 2SRI International, Menlo Park, CA Cytokines are important early indicators of infection and immune response and therefore serve as excellent diagnostics for monitoring health. We are developing an easy-to-use handheld diagnostic sensor system for the rapid, noninvasive detection of multiple cytokine levels in saliva. Space travel may negatively impact immune function, and such a lightweight monitor for the routine measurement of cytokine levels could play an important role in astronaut health maintenance during long-duration space missions; it would be an asset to the medical community on Earth as well. The goal of this project is to develop an integrated immunosensor system to deliver results in minutes with appropriate sensitivity. Key features of our approach include adaptation of an affinity-based assay that utilizes up-converting phosphor (UCP) reporter technology developed at SRI International; comparison and optimization of assay performance on two lateral-flow platforms, a microfabricated polymer fluidic chip from mic, AB and a conventional nitrocellulose membrane; and development of a compact optical detection system for the UCP reporter assay. The immunoassay approach developed here should be extensible to a range of immunoassay analytes beyond the initial cytokine targets. Support from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for the National Center for Space Biological Technologies (contract NNA04CC32A-7) and a postdoctoral fellowship for A.L.O. from the National Space Biomedical Research Institute, contract NCC 9-58-377, are gratefully acknowledged.
- 65 -
- 66 -
We are developing a noninvasive drug compliance monitor with the capability of detecting and recording the ingestion of any medication that would be of great utility in treatment regimens in which compliance is crucial to success of therapy. The technology under development consists of two parts: a fluorescent molecule that is incorporated into the medication as a traceable excipient, and a wristwatch-like device that can transdermally detect the presence of the excipient in the bloodstream. We selected a GRAS (generally regarded as safe) excipient for incorporation into the medication to be monitored and demonstrated that when orally ingested, the fluorescence from that excipient is detectable in the bloodstream. Additionally, we built a device with the capability of transdermally detecting fluorescence in an animal model.
- 67 -
Ultrathin and Flexible Catheterscopes for Minimally Invasive Imaging, Diagnosis, and Therapy Within Hospitals and Remote Clinics
Eric J. Seibel1,2, Richard S. Johnston2, C. David Melville2, Cameron M. Lee2, Ryland C. Bryant2
1 2
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Minimally invasive medicine is well established in hospitals in the United States and is beginning to spread to more remote clinics. However, the poor performance and high cost of ultrathin flexible endoscopes prohibits the use of endoscopes less than 3 mm in diameter. The main problem with current endoscope technology using fiber bundles and small sensor arrays is that the image resolution is fundamentally limited because the resolution is proportional to the number of elements, thus requiring larger endoscope diameters for high-quality images. To make ultrathin, flexible endoscopes, this technology is pushed to its extreme with many sacrifices. The problems with commercial, ultrathin flexible endoscopes based on coherent fiberoptic bundles are: Number of pixels within the field of view decreases with diameter, Honeycomb non-imaging area around central holes of imaging pixels, Not highly flexible shaft or semi-rigid, Expensive and fragile, and Degrades with cleaning.
We have developed a new type of ultrathin and flexible laser scanning endoscope that is called a catheterscope. Red, green, and blue (RGB) laser light is combined into a singlemode optical fiber at the base station and ends at a small tube piezoelectric actuator at the distal or in vivo end. The distal tip of the optical fiber is cantilevered a short distance and the tube piezo vibrates the cantilever at the mechanical resonance to achieve 15 Hz frame rate imaging. The scanned laser illumination is focused by a lens assembly that can be molded from plastic. The backscattered light, modulated by the tissue, is collected with a ring of 12 plastic optical fibers that return light to photodiodes at the base station. Full color, 500-line images are created similar to a laser scanning microscope, one pixel at a time. The in vivo part of the catheterscope is very small and the shaft is highly flexible (diameter, 1.6 mm with a rigid tip length of 13 mm); thus, catheterscope use on unsedated patients can be expected. All four key components described for the distal end (singlemode optical fiber, tube piezo actuator, molded plastic lens assembly, and plastic signal collection fibers) are low in cost. Assembly of these components at high volume is possible so that the distal end may be disposed after a single use, eliminating the many requirements for cleaning endoscopes such as highly trained staff, costly equipment, and resulting chemical waste. The advantages of this catheterscope technology over current ultrathin and flexible endoscopes are listed below and compared side-by side in an upcoming publication (see reference). A caveat is that the two catheterscopes already developed (monochrome and full color) have the disadvantage of a longer rigid tip length for non-confocal geometry and the technology is not commercially available.
- 68 -
2x image resolution with no honeycomb non-imaging areas 10x minimum bend radius for the highly flexible shaft Low-cost components and able to be manufactured in high volumes Sterile single-use device with cleaning costs and chemical waste eliminated Requires less anesthetic or can be used with unsedated patients Can be battery powered in the future
Another major difference between the catheterscope technology and current flexible endoscopes is the use of directed or focused laser energy to image. This high-quality laser light can also be in the ultraviolet and infrared regions of the spectrum and at high power so many different types of optical diagnoses and therapies can be integrated with the imaging in situ. In the near future, the catheterscope will allow previously inaccessible regions of the body to be imaged at high resolution, and, while imaging, additional diagnostic and therapeutic procedures can be done efficiently using the same minimally invasive medical device that has all the advantages listed above. Funding was provided by grants R33-CA094303 and R21-CA110184 from the National Cancer Institute (NIH/USA) and the PENTAX Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Reference Seibel, E.J., Johnston, R.S., Melville, C.D. A full color scanning fiber endoscope. Optical Fibers and Sensors for Medical Diagnostics and Treatment Applications VI, Proc. SPIE vol. 6083, in press.
- 69 -
3D Cell Imaging for Early and Rapid Disease Diagnosis in Hospitals and Remote Clinics
Eric J. Seibel1, Mark Fauver2, Thomas Neumann2, Michael G. Meyer2, Florence W. Patten2, J. Richard Rahn2, Jon Hayenga2, Alan C. Nelson2
1
Currently, image-based disease diagnosis is made using conventional optical microscopes that produce 2D images of stained tissue, and fluorescence is rarely used. Greater sensitivity of the standard morphological analysis performed by cytologists can be achieved by imaging the cell nucleus in 3D instead of 2D [1]. There are additional features that indicate disease, such as cancers, which are clearly seen in 3D images having multiple perspectives, that are not easily seen in a 2D single perspective image [2]. Major reasons for the lack of image-based disease diagnosis in 3D is the prohibitive cost of 3D microscopes, their reliance on fluorescence imaging, and the lack of textbook training in 3D. We have developed the Optical Projection Tomography Microscope (OPTM), a novel type of microscope, to image cells and nuclei in 3D that have been fixed and stained with the commonly used, absorption-based chromatin-associated dye, hematoxylin [3]. The stained cells are put in a microcapillary tube that is placed within a microfabricated rotational joint that has parallel optical surfaces to minimize any image distortion. As the capillary tube is rotated, 250 images are captured within 180 degrees of rotation within 1 minute. By using techniques developed for x-ray computed tomography (CT), volumetric 3D images are reconstructed with isometric and submicron resolution [3]. Applications of this technology in pulmonary and critical care medicine are envisioned to be close to the patient either within the hospital or in a remote clinic. In the hospital, a pulmonologist would like the specimen diagnosis for a patient with suspected respiratory disease while the patient is undergoing the medical procedure. Automated sample preparation techniques for the OPTM are being developed for sputum, fine needle aspirate (FNA), and bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL). In a remote clinic, an infectious respiratory disease may be suspected and a rapid image-based diagnosis will augment any DNA-based testing, thus reducing the chance of infection spreading across the local region. Reducing the cost of 3D microscopes and automating the sample preparation are necessary steps for both the acceptance of more sensitive 3D image-based disease diagnosis and the localization of the 3D microscope closer to the patient for more rapid cytological analysis. The OPTM fills a need that is not being met by confocal laser scanning microscopes and wide-field deconvolution optical microscopes because the OPTM images absorption-based dyes used routinely in pathology. Furthermore, these commercially available 3D microscopes typically cost over $100,000 and acquire only a single perspective view of the 3D tissue structure, while the OPTM images and displays all (360) perspectives and works in the more useful transmission mode, unlike commercial confocal microscopes. Thus, the OPTM is expected to provide much more diagnostic utility for less cost.
- 70 -
References 1. Fauver, M., Nelson, A.C., Patten, F.W., Rahn, J.R., Neumann, T., Meyer, M., Seibel, E.J. (2005) Computed tomography at the subcellular level for early detection of lung cancer, Abstracts of the 11th World Conference on Lung Cancer, Paper #P-361, Barcelona, Spain, 3 6 July 2005, Lung Cancer 49(suppl.2):S210-S211. 2. Johnson, N., Krebs, M., Boudreau, R., Giorgi, G., LeGros, M., Larabell, C. (2003) Actinfilled nuclear invaginations indicate degree of cell de-differentiation. Differentiation 71:414 424. 3. Fauver, M., Seibel, E.J., Rahn, J.R., Meyer, M.G., Patten, F.W., Neumann, T., Nelson, A.C. (2005) Three-dimensional imaging of single isolated cell nuclei using optical projection tomography. OSA Optics Express 13(11):4210-4223. Note: the rotating 3D nucleus used for the cover figure for this issue of the peer-reviewed multimedia Web journal is from our article; see www.opticsexpress.org.
- 71 -
Steven A. Soper, Jason Emory, Ren Yang, Wanjun Wang Departments of Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, Center for BioModular Multi-Scale Systems, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA Several cancer-related diseases have been determined to be highly associated with point mutations in genomic DNA that can be used as biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, or monitoring disease recurrence. One such cancer is colorectal cancer (CRC); it has been shown that point mutations in the KRAS gene occur early in tumorigenesis and therefore show promise as biomarkers for diagnostic screening. There are 19 different point mutations in the KRAS gene, all of which must be tested for securing reliable diagnoses and prognoses. This represents a challenge due to the low abundance (minority) of these mutations found in most clinical samples, with the majority of DNA present as the wild type. Previous work in our laboratory has focused on the development of the ligase detection reaction with single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer (LDR-spFRET) using molecular beacons as the reporter system and single molecule photon burst analysis to detect point mutations in DNA rapidly and efficiently (see reference). This presentation will discuss two new technologies emanating from our laboratory using this assay format: (1) design and fabrication of a field-portable single molecule detection system for rapidly screening low-abundant point mutations in genomic DNA and (2) multiplexing the LDR-spFRET assay using a multi-channel chip to increase throughput and provide complete molecular profiles by screening the entire panel of KRAS mutations associated with CRC. (1) A polymer fluidic chip containing dual optical fibers, which were interfaced to a diode laser and single photon avalanche diode, was assembled into a small package. Insertion of genomic DNA into the device and using a flow-through processing format generated molecular beacons that underwent spFRET, indicating the presence of the mutation. (2) A microfluidic chip was designed to test for all 19-point mutations simultaneously by imaging detection zones of the multiple channels onto an array of pixels of a CCD camera. The fluorophores in the channel array were illuminated using a photodiode laser launched into the side of the device, which possessed an integrated waveguide. The waveguiding was supported by an SU-8 core embedded into a poly(methylmethacrylate), PMMA, microfluidic chip. The SU-8 waveguide irradiated a series of fluidic channels with the coupling from waveguide to waveguide accomplished using microlenses formed at the terminus of each waveguide (see reference). Reference Wabuyele, M., Farquar, H., Stryjewski, W., Hammer, R.P., Soper, S.A., Cheng, Y., Barany, F. Approaching real-time molecular diagnostics: Single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer (spFRET) for the analysis of low abundant point mutations in K-ras oncogene. JACS, 125 (2003):6937-6945.
- 72 -
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS; Department of Technology Systems, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
Interoperability at the device and system levels has the potential to improve ease of use for pointof-care systems while lowering the cost of these systems. To this end, we developed a prototype wearable monitoring system based on interoperability standards that demonstrates plug-and-play wireless connectivity between the system components. The system utilizes both device-level (IEEE 11073, Bluetooth) and system-level (Health Level [HL7], CORBA) standards. The wearable monitoring system stores data in a local database, and these data are then sent to a remote database via HL7 messages. The remote data can be viewed and processed with a graphical user interface created in Java that employs the CORBAmed PIDS and COAS services as implemented by OpenEMed. Lessons learned from this endeavor are summarized.
- 73 -
- 74 -
- 75 -
Kaiming Ye3, Vijay K. Varadan1, Hargsoon Yoon2, Jithesh V. Veetil3, Ryan Tian4, Sudhir Shah5, Jay Mehta6
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; 2Department of Electrical Engineering, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4Department of Chemistry, University of Arkansas; 5Division of Nephrology, 6Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR For point-of-care (POC) diagnostics, it is very attractive to develop devices that can monitor the health condition of patients outside the hospital environment via a wireless communication network. To this end, we have developed (1) aligned nanotube and nanowire array sensors on silicon substrate integrated with multichip module (MCM) and wireless communication module and (2) aligned nanowire array on flexible polymeric substrate with organic thin film transistor for wireless communication. Aligned nanotube and nanowire arrays have been grown by chemical vapor deposition and electrochemical deposition using nanoporous templates with their electrical connections constructed by a thin film process through lithography. The radius of nanotubes and nanowires and the spacing between the nanoelectrodes on electrochemical sensing array have been controlled to realize ultrasensitivity, spatial resolution, and fast response for a small quantity of target biomolecules. Nanoscale electrodes on a sensing platform are functionalized with, for instance, antibody against biomarkers. For the integration of nanoscale sensors with signal processing and wireless communication modules, multichip module technology including the low-temperature cofired ceramic (LTCC) process has been applied for compact and reliable operation in POC use. Potential applications to cardiovascular diseases and neurodegenerative disorders will be presented.
- 76 -
Department of Chemistry, Oakland University, Rochester, MI; 2Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; 3Department of Pathology, The Vanderbilt Clinic, Nashville, TN Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1, a recently identified CYP1 gene family member, was reported to be overexpressed in multiple types of cancer. As a potential tumor biomarker, the enzyme becomes an immediate target for research, focused on cancer diagnostics, monitoring, and treatment. The intensive and systematic studies of P450 expression, regulation, and function in tumor cells required the new sensor systems development. Traditional methods, however, are time consuming and have a high cross-reactivity rate between P450 subfamilies. In this work, we successfully developed a CYP1B1 biosensor using phage displayed recombinant antibodies (scFvs) and QCM-transducer. The smaller size of scFvs compared to commonly used monoclonal antibodies increased the surface density, which greatly improved sensor sensitivity. Cross-reactivity of the traditional immunoassay was addressed by using four distinct scFvs, which bind to different epitopes of CYP1B1. All scFvs were biotinylated and coupled to the Au QCM surfaces using pre-immobilized neutravidin layer. Our scFv-QCM biosensors showed excellent sensitivity (detection limit, 9 nM) and specificity (confirmed by utilizing different negative control antigens). The kinetics of binding events was also fully studied. The scFv-QCM biosensors were successfully used to measure CYP1B1 concentration in several cancer and normal cell lysates. The results show that the expression of the CYP1B1 is higher in the cancer cell lines than in those normal ones tested. Our system demonstrates the outstanding attribute of scFvs for improving sensitivity and specificity in sensing application. It will enable us to further analyze and characterize different P450 subfamilies and clarify some questions addressed in cancer diagnostic, monitoring, and treatment.
- 77 -
Miniaturized Silicon Instruments for Cellular Manipulation, In Vivo Imaging, and Nanoscale Sensing
Xiaojing Zhang Department of Biomedical Engineering and Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX Nano-Micro, Info, and Bio are integrative components of our research, in which engineering expertise in photonics, microelectronics, microfabrication, and nanotechnologies is synergized to facilitate biomedical studies and to obtain a better understanding of the fundamental problems in life science. This in turn benefits the advancement of engineering research. Actively pursued areas are the following: Miniaturized silicon instruments for in vivo cell and embryo manipulation and culturing, in particular, microinjections, ultrasonic cellular-scale surgical tools, self-assembly and high-speed particle sorting for studying cell mechanics, cellular interactions, and embryo development network. Nano-micro fabricated photonic sensors and scanners for in vivo imaging and
microscopy toward miniaturized endoscopic precancer detection and diagnosis.
Multiscale simulation of fundamental fields, forces, flows, and energy processes involved in cell-cell interactions, cell-material interactions, and subcellular interactions. Our recent work on development of silicon MEMS-based RNA interference (RNAi) instruments has demonstrated important benefits to genetics and developmental biology studies. The microinstruments enable high-throughput investigation of how gene activities control embryonic development and how errors in gene action lead to birth defects and cancer. Our invention and development of a MEMS-based microinjector with on-chip optical force sensor is capable of high-speed injection of precise amounts of regulatory molecules into fruit fly embryos. The impact is likely to be significant not only for developmental biology studies but also for a range of other biomedical applications such as drug delivery, diagnostic screening, and genetic testing. We also made contributions to self-assembly MEMS technology by experimentally characterizing the positioning forces during self-assembly. Our measurements, combined with numerical modeling, enable researchers to quantify the role of the shape of the part-to-be assembled in self-assembly processes. Our recent findings in this area are likely to have a profound impact on the design and optimization of microfluidic self-assembly technologies, in both biology and MEMS fabrication technology.
- 78 -
Organizing Committee
Organizing Committee
Patricia Flatley Brennan, Ph.D., R.N., FAAN, FACMI Moehlman Bascom Professor School of Nursing and College of Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Robert Domeier, M.D., FACEP EMS Coordinator St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Paul DOrazio, Ph.D. Director of Sensor Development Instrumentation Laboratory Rinat Esenaliev, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology The University of Texas Medical Branch Reed Gardner, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Medical Informatics University of Utah School of Medicine Jeffrey Griffiths, M.D., M.P.H.&T.M. Associate Professor of Public Health and Family Medicine Tufts University John Haller, Ph.D., M.A. Acting Director, Division of Applied Science and Technology National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH, DHHS Bruce Hamilton, Ph.D. Director, Bioengineering and Environmental Systems Division Directorate for Engineering, National Science Foundation Donald Harrington, M.D., M.A. Senior Science Advisor National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH, DHHS John Hickner, M.D., M.Sc. Professor of Family Medicine and Director, AAFP National Research Network University of Chicago George Hutchinson, Ph.D. (with Dr. Pekka Merilainen) Manager, Advanced Technology GE Healthcare Clinical Systems - 79 -
Christine Ann Kelley, Ph.D. Director, Division of Discovery Science and Technology National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH, DHHS Brenda Korte, Ph.D. Program Director, Division of Discovery Science and Technology National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH, DHHS Larry Kricka, D.Phil., FACB, CChem, FRSC, FRCPath Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Director of General Chemistry University of Pennsylvania John McDevitt, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry The University of Texas at Austin Grace Peng, Ph.D. Program Director, Division of Discovery Science and Technology National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH, DHHS Christopher Price, Ph.D., FACB, FRSC, FRCPath Visiting Professor in Clinical Biochemistry Department of Clinical Biochemistry John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford Mary Lynn Realff, Ph.D., BSTE Program Director, Division of Design and Manufacturing Innovation Directorate for Engineering, National Science Foundation Matthew Realff, Ph.D. Program Director, Division of Design and Manufacturing Innovation Directorate for Engineering, National Science Foundation Rebecca Richards-Kortum, Ph.D. Stanley C. Moore Professor of Bioengineering Rice University Justin Starren, M.D., Ph.D., FACMI Associate Professor of Clinical Biomedical Informatics and Clinical Radiology Columbia University Medical Center Kai Erik Thomenius, Ph.D., M.S. Chief Technologist, Ultrasound and Biomedical Imaging Technologies GE Global Research
- 80 -
Participant List
NIBIB/NHLBI/NSF Workshop on
Improving Health Care Accessibility Through Point-of-Care Technologies
- 81
-
James C. Benneyan, Ph.D Professor Northeastern University 360 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02115 (617) 373-2975 (617) 373-2921 Fax benneyan@coe.neu.edu William Bentley, Ph.D. Herbert Rabin Distinguished Professor Director Bioengineering Graduate Program Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering A. James Clark School of Engineering Center for Biosystems Research Biotechnology Institute University of Maryland, College Park Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building, Room 3232 College Park, MD 20742 (301) 405-4321 bentley@umd.edu B. Wayne Bequette, Ph.D. Professor Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Ricketts Building, Room 129 110 Eighth Street Troy, NY 12180-3590 (518) 276-6683 (518) 276-4030 Fax bequette@rpi.edu Rohit Bhargava, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Bioengineering and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology Beckman Institute University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 405 North Mathews Avenue Urbana, IL 61801 (217) 265-6596 rxb@uiuc.edu
Paul G. Biondich, M.D., M.S. Assistant Professor Department of Pediatrics/Informatics Childrens Health Services Research Riley Hospital for Children Indiana University School of Medicine Research Scientist Regenstrief Institute RR 330 699 West Drive Indianapolis, IN 46202 (317) 278-3466 (317) 278-0456 Fax pbiondich@regenstrief.org James M. Birch, Ph.D. M Division Chemical and Biological National Security Program Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory L-172 7000 East Avenue Livermore, CA 94550 (925) 422-7105 birch1@llnl.gov Stephen A. Boppart, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering, Bioengineering, and Medicine Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 405 North Mathews Avenue Urbana, IL 61801 (217) 244-7479 (217) 244-1995 Fax boppart@uiuc.edu Patricia Flatley Brennan, Ph.D., R.N., FAAN, FACMI Moehlman Bascum Professor School of Nursing and College of Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison H6.241 600 Highland Avenue Madison, WI 53792 (608) 263-5251 (608) 263-5252 Fax pbrennan@engr.wisc.edu
- 82
-
Eric Brewer, Ph.D., M.S. Professor Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Berkeley Soda Hall, Room 623 Berkeley, CA 94720-1776 (510) 642-8143 brewer@cs.berkeley.edu Andrew Broderick, M.A., M.B.A. Senior Consultant SRI Consulting Business Intelligence SRIC-BI 333 Ravenswood Avenue Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 859-3132 abroderick@sric-bi.com Richard Buckius, Ph.D. Acting Assistant Director for Engineering Directorate for Engineering National Science Foundation Suite 505 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8301 (703) 292-9013 Fax rbuckius@nsf.gov Kenneth F. Buechler, Ph.D. President and Chief Scientific Officer Biosite, Inc. 9975 Summers Ridge Road San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 805-3131 (858) 586-7542 Fax kbuechler@biosite.com Mark Burns, Ph.D., P.E., M.S. Professor Chemical Engineering Department University of Michigan H.H. Dow Building, Room 3018 2300 Hayward Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2136 (734) 764-4315 (734) 763-0459 Fax maburns@umich.edu
Jian Cao, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Road Evanston, IL 60208 (847) 467-1032 jcao@northwestern.edu Andrea Carbonaro, M.S. Graduate Student Sohn Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering University of California, Berkeley Etcheverry Hall, Room 5127 Berkeley, CA 94720 (510) 642-1585 (510) 643-5599 Fax carbonar@newton.berkeley.edu Mark F. Carroll, M.D. Telehealth Program Director Indian Health Service Suite 201 1215 North Beaver Street Flagstaff, AZ 86001 (928) 214-3927 (928) 214-3924 Fax mark.carroll@ihs.gov Karen Chang, Ph.D., R.N. Assistant Professor Medical Informatics Fellow Director of Information Technology Purdue University School of Nursing Rodebush VA Medical Center at Indianapolis 502 North University Street West Lafayette, IN 47907-2069 (765) 496-3086 (765) 494-6339 Fax ckchang@purdue.edu Nee-Yin Chou, Ph.D. President CW Optics, Inc. 1103 Moore House Road Yorktown, VA 23690 (757) 872-4000 (757) 872-4434 Fax nyc@cwoptics.com
- 83
-
Douglas A. Christensen, Ph.D. Professor Department of Bioengineering University of Utah 50 South Central Campus Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (801) 581-8528 christen@ee.utah.edu Bernard M. Churchill, M.D. Chief, Pediatric Urology David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles 10833 LeConte Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90095 (310) 206-9718 (310) 206-9726 Fax bchurchill@mednet.ucla.edu Jim Cobb Director of Marketing, Critical Care Smiths Medical 2231 Rutherford Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 602-4468 jim.cobb@smiths-medical.com W. Dale Compton, Ph.D., M.S. Lillian M. Gilbreth Distinguished Professor of Industrial Engineering, Emeritus School of Industrial Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907 (765) 494-0828 dcompton@nae.edu Gerard L. Cot, Ph.D. Charles H. and Bettye Barclay Professor and Head Department of Biomedical Engineering Texas A&M University Zachry Building, Room 337 MS3120 College Station, TX 77843-3120 (979) 845-4196 (979) 845-4450 Fax gcote@tamu.edu
Richard M. Crooks, Ph.D. Professor Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry The University of Texas at Austin Room A5300 1 University Station Austin, TX 78712-0165 (512) 475-8639 (512) 475-8651 Fax crooks@cm.utexas.edu Kenneth C. Curley, M.D. Chief Scientist Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command 5902 Riverwood Court Frederick, MD 21704 (301) 696-9240 curley@tatrc.org Maureen A. Dailey, M.S.N., R.N., CWOCN Consultant Dailey Solutions 225 Seaman Avenue Rockville Centre, NY 11570 (516) 546-5146 daileysolution@aol.com Donna J. Dean, Ph.D. Senior Science Advisor Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC Eighth Floor 1341 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 (202) 289-7475 (202) 289-7454 Fax djdean@lewis-burke.com
- 84
-
Semahat S. Demir, Ph.D., M.S. Program Director Biomedical Engineering and Research to Aid Persons with Disabilities Division of Bioengineering and Environmental Systems
National Science Foundation
Suite 565
4201 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22230
(703) 292-7950
(703) 292-9098 Fax sdemir@nsf.gov Michael R. Descour, Ph.D., M.S. Associate Professor
College of Optical Sciences
University of Arizona
1630 East University Boulevard
Tucson, AZ 85721
(520) 626-5086
(520) 621-3389
michael.descour@optics.arizona.edu
Gilbert B. Devey Program Director
National Science Foundation
4201 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22230
(703) 292-7943
(703) 292-9098 Fax gdevey@nsf.gov Robert M. Domeier, M.D., FACEP Medical Director
Midwest Medflight
EMS Coordinator
Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
4888 South Ridgeside Circle
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
(734) 669-0496
(734) 761-2405 Fax rdomeier@aol.com
Paul DOrazio, Ph.D. Director of Sensor Development Research and Development Instrumentation Laboratory 101 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421 (781) 861-4240
(781) 861-4452 Fax pdorazio@ilww.com George M. Dougherty, Ph.D. Center for Micro- and Nano-Technology
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
L-222
7000 East Avenue
Livermore, CA 94551
(925) 423-3088
dougherty9@llnl.gov
Kornel Ehmann, Ph.D. Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Northwestern University
2145 Sheridan Road
Evanston, IL 60208-3111
(848) 491-3263
(847) 491-3915 Fax k-ehmann@northwestern.edu Leo Einck, Ph.D. President
Sequella, Inc.
Suite 200
9610 Medical Center Drive
Rockville, MD 20850
(301) 762-7776
leoeinck@sequella.com
Rinat O. Esenaliev, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director of Laboratory for Optical Sensing and Monitoring
Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology
Center for Biomedical Engineering
The University of Texas Medical Branch
301 University Boulevard
Galveston, TX 77555-0456
(409) 772-8144
(409) 772-8144 Fax riesenal@utmb.edu
- 85
-
Boyd M. Evans, M.S. Research Staff, Biomedical Sciences Advanced Lasers and Optics Group Engineering Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory University of Tennessee Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering Center for Musculoskeletal Research Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 Bethel Valley Road Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6006 (865) 574-9418 (865) 574-1249 Fax ev3@ornl.gov Shamiram Feinglass, M.D., M.P.H. Senior Medical Officer Coverage and Analysis Group Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 (410) 786-9262 (410) 786-9286 Fax shamiram.feinglass@cms.hhs.gov Henry Francis, M.D. Program Officer for Sub-Saharan Africa Fogarty International Center National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 496-4784 hfrancis@mail.nih.gov Antonio Agustin Garcia, Ph.D. Professor of Bioengineering Interim Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Harrington Department of Bioengineering Arizona State University Engineering Center G-Wing, ECG 334 Box 879709 Tempe, AZ 85287-9709 (480) 965-8798 (480) 727-7624 Fax tony.garcia@asu.edu
Reed M. Gardner, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor and Chair Department of Medical Informatics University of Utah School of Medicine 1745 Cornell Circle Salt Lake City, UT 84108 (801) 581-1164 (801) 581-4297 Fax reed.gardner@hsc.utah.edu Lisa A. Gaudet, M.B.A. Director Remote Care Technology Northeast Health 2212 Burdett Avenue Troy, NY 12180 (518) 271-3149 (518) 273-3307 Fax gaudetl@nehealth.com John Charles Gerdes, Ph.D. Chief Scientific Officer Research and Development Micronics, Inc. 8463 154th Avenue, NE Redmond, WA 98052 (303) 478-4662 (303) 388-4665 Fax jgerdes@micronics.net Ken Gertz, M.P.A. Assistant Vice President for Research Office of Research Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute George M. Low Center for Industrial Innovation, Room 7015 110 Eighth Street Troy, NY 12180 (518) 276-4863 gertzk@rpi.edu
- 86
-
Lucy Ann Godley, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor Section of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine University of Chicago MC 2115 5841 South Maryland Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 (773) 702-4140 (773) 702-0963 Fax lgodley@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu Calvin Goforth, Ph.D. President Virtual Incubation Company, LLC Suite 135 535 West Research Center Boulevard Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 571-2592 cgoforth@virtual-incubation.com Jerome H. Grossman, M.D. Senior Fellow John F. Kennedy School of Government Fourth Floor 1 Brattle Square Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 547-9696 jeromegrossman@liongatecorp.com Amit Kumar Gupta, Ph.D. Birck Nanotechnology Center Purdue University Box 274 1205 State Street West Lafayette, IN 47907 (765) 496-7407 agupta@purdue.edu
David A. Haake, M.D. Professor of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles The Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Division of Infectious Diseases Suite 111F 11301 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90073 (310) 268-3814 (310) 268-4928 Fax dhaake@ucla.edu Daniel B. Hall, Ph.D. Staff Scientist Advanced Sensor Development Radiation Monitoring Devices 44 Hunt Street Watertown, MA 02472 (617) 668-6822 (617) 926-9980 Fax dhall@rmdinc.com John Wayne Haller, Ph.D., M.A. Acting Division Director Division of Applied Science and Technology National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Suite 200 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-5649 (301) 451-4780 (301) 480-1614 Fax hallerj@mail.nih.gov
- 87
-
Donald Paul Harrington, M.D., M.A. Senior Science Advisor National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Suite 202 MSC 5477 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 451-0161 (301) 480-4515 Fax harringtond@mail.nih.gov David George Hawksworth, Ph.D. Managing Director Oxford Biosensors Ltd. Oxford Industrial Park Mead Road Yarnton Oxford OX20 1PB United Kingdom +44 1865 849100 david.hawksworth@oxford-biosensors.com Adam Heller, Ph.D., Doctor Honoris Causa Research Professor Department of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin MC0-400 1 University Station Austin, TX 78712 (512) 471-8874 (512) 471-8799 Fax heller@che.utexas.edu Charles S. Henry, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry Colorado State University 200 West Lake Street Fort Collins, CO 80523-1872 (970) 491-2852 cshenry@lamar.colostate.edu
John M. Hickner, M.D., M.Sc. Professor of Family Medicine Pritzker School of Medicine University of Chicago Suite 160 MC 7110 5841 5841 South Maryland Avenue Chicago, IL 60637 (773) 834-6855 (773) 834-9864 Fax jhickner@uchicago.edu Allen Hill, Ph.D., Sc.D., M.A. Director Strategic Technologies Oxford Biosensors Ltd. Oxford Industrial Park Mead Road Yarnton Oxford OX5 1QU United Kingdom +44 1865 890100 allen.hill@oxford-biosensors.com Karlene Andrea Hoo, D.Eng. Professor and Associate Dean of Research College of Engineering and Chemical Engineering Texas Tech Health Science Center Texas Tech University Mail Stop 3103 2903 Fourth Street Lubbock, TX 79409-3121 (806) 742-3451, ext. 262 (806) 742-3493 Fax karlene.hoo@ttu.edu R. Rodney Howell, M.D. Special Assistant to the Director National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health Room 4A05 6100 Executive Boulevard Rockville, MD 20852 (301) 496-8535 (301) 480-4520 Fax howellr@mail.nih.gov
- 88
-
K. Jimmy Hsia, Ph.D. Program Director National Science Foundation Room 545 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-7020 (703) 292-9053 Fax jhsia@nsf.gov George M. Hutchinson, Ph.D. Manager, Advanced Technology GE Healthcare Clinical Systems 8200 West Tower Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53223 (414) 687-3272 george.hutchinson@med.ge.com Mary Lou Ingeholm, M.S. Biomedical Engineer Department of Radiology Imaging Science and Information Systems Center Division of eHealth and Telemedicine Georgetown University Suite 603 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20007 (202) 687-7954 (202) 784-3479 Fax ingeholm@georgetown.edu Daniel Irimia, M.D., Ph.D. Research Associate BioMEMS Resource Center Harvard Medical School Suite 1411 114 16th Street Boston, MA 02129 (617) 724-6543 dirimia@partners.org Rich Jones, Ph.D. Research Associate Department of Chemistry Vanderbilt University 7330 Stevenson Center Nashville, TN 37235 (615) 322-4404 (615) 343-1234 Fax richard.d.jones@vanderbilt.edu
Usmah Kawoos School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems Drexel University c/o Renee Cohen 510 Bossone 3141 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19104 (215) 833-7139 (215) 895-4968 Fax usmah@drexel.edu Christine Ann Kelley, Ph.D. Director Division of Discovery Science and Technology National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Suite 200 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 451-4778 (301) 480-4973 Fax kelleyc@mail.nih.gov Brenda Korte, Ph.D. Program Director Division of Discovery Science and Technology National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Suite 200 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 402-1231 (301) 480-4973 Fax kortebr@mail.nih.gov Eleni Kousvelari, D.D.S., D.Sc. Acting Director Center for Biotechnology and Innovation National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institutes of Health Natcher Building, Room 4N 24F Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 594-2427 (301) 480-8318 Fax kousvelari@de45.nidr.nih.gov
- 89
-
Carolyn R. Krause, Ph.D., R.N. Executive Director Wisconsin Center for Nursing 1050 South Springdale Road Waukesha, WI 53186 (262) 798-1226 kralane@we.rr.com Larry J. Kricka, D.Phil., FACB, CChem, FRSC, FRCPath Professor Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of Pennsylvania 7.103 Founders Pavilion University of Pennsylvania Medical Center 3400 Spruce Street Philadelphia, PA 19104 (215) 662-6575 (215) 662-7529 Fax kricka@mail.med.upenn.edu Anantha Krishnan, Ph.D. Director of Research and Development Meso-, Micro- and Nano-Technology Engineering Directorate Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory MS L-151 7000 East Avenue Livermore, CA 94550 (925) 423-9497 krishnan8@llnl.gov Danuta Krotoski, Ph.D. Acting Associate Director for Prevention Research and International Programs National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health Room 2A01 MSC 7510 6100 Executive Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-7510 (301) 435-7566 (301) 435-0009 Fax krotoskd@mail.nih.gov
Sunil Kumar, D.Eng. Assistant Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering Clarkson University 8 Clarkson Avenue Box 5720 Potsdam, NY 13699 (315) 268-6602 skumar@clarkson.edu Dale N. Larson, M.S. Director Technology and Engineering Center Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology Harvard Medical School BCMP 240 Longwood Avenue Boston, MA 02115 (617) 432-6171 dlarson@hms.harvard.edu Imants R. Lauks, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer Epocal, Inc. 2935 Conroy Road Ottawa, ON K1G 6C6 Canada (613) 738-6192, ext. 221 (613) 738-6195 Fax ilauks@epocal.com Betty A. Levine, M.S. Head Division of eHealth and Telemedicine Department of Radiology Imaging Science and Information Systems Center Georgetown University Suite 603 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20057-1479 (202) 687-7950 (202) 784-3479 Fax levine@isis.georgetown.edu
- 90
-
Kalle Levon, Dr.Agr., M.Sc. Professor Associate Provost of Research Polytechnic University 6 Metrotech Center Brooklyn, NY 11201 (718) 260-3339 (718) 260-3063 Fax klevon@poly.edu Solitaire A. Lindsay, D.Eng. Harrington Department of Bioengineering Arizona State University ECG 334 P.O. Box 879709 Tempe, AZ 85287 (623) 229-8228 solitaire.lindsay@gmail.com Qiang Liu, Ph.D. Research Associate Department of Neurological Surgery University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian University Hospital Suite B-400 200 Lothrop Street Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (412) 648-9230 qliu@neuronet.pitt.edu Shih-Chi Liu, Ph.D. Program Director for Sensor Technology National Science Foundation Room 545 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-7017 (703) 292-9098 Fax sliu@nsf.gov Gabriel Lopez, Ph.D. Director Center for Biomedical Engineering Professor, Chemical Engineering and Chemistry University of New Mexico MSC 01 1120 Albuquerque, NM 87131 (505) 277-4939 (505) 277-5433 Fax gplopez@unm.edu
Martha Shauck Lundberg, Ph.D. Health Scientist Administrator National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Division of Heart and Vascular Diseases National Institutes of Health Room 9146 6701 Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892-7940 (301) 435-0513 (301) 480-1335 Fax lundberm@nhlbi.nih.gov Greg Magness, M.B.A., P.E. Business Development Manager Virtual Incubation Co. Suite 135 535 West Research Center Boulevard Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 571-2592 gmagness@virtual-incubation.com Lisa Maillart, Ph.D., M.S. Assistant Professor Department of Operations Weatherhead School of Management Senior Scholar Center for Health Care Research and Policy Case Western Reserve University 321 Peter B. Lewis 10900 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44106 (216) 368-4797 lisa.maillart@case.edu Daniel Malamud, Ph.D. Professor of Basic Sciences HIV/AIDS Research Program Department of Basic Sciences New York University College of Dentistry Room 904 S 345 South 24th Street New York, NY 10010 (212) 998-9331 (212) 995-4362 Fax daniel.malamud@nyu.edu
- 91
-
Lalita Manchanda, Ph.D. Chair Department of Engineering University of Denver Knudson Hall, Room 200 2390 South York Street Denver, CO 80208 (303) 871-2107 (303) 871-4450 Fax lalita.manchanda@du.edu Ronald Marchessault, M.A., M.B.A. Senior Program Manager Advanced Medical Device Research and Development Division of Clinical Applications Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center 1056 Patchel Street Frederick, MD 21702 (301) 619-4016 (301) 619-7911 Fax marchessault@tatrc.org Roger G. Mark, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Health Sciences and Technology Professor of Electrical Engineering Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E25-505 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 (617) 253-7818 (617) 258-7859 Fax rgmark@mit.edu Constantinos Mavroidis, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Northeastern University 360 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02115 (617) 373-4121 (617) 373-2921 Fax mavro@cao.neu.edu
Pat McAllister, Ph.D. Professor and Director of Neurosurgical Research Department of Neurosurgery School of Medicine Wayne State University and Childrens Hospital of Michigan Suite UHC-6E 4201 St. Antoine Detroit, MI 48201 (313) 993-9294 (313) 577-0448 Fax pmcallister@med.wayne.edu John T. McDevitt, Ph.D. Professor Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry McDevitt Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin Suite A5300 1 University Station 24th and Speedway WEL 4.420 Austin, TX 78712-0165 (512) 471-0046, ext. 10046 (512) 232-7052 Fax mcdevitt@mail.utexas.edu Robert R. Meyer, Ph.D., M.S. Professor Department of Computer Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison 1210 West Dayton Street Madison, WI 53706 (608) 274-0206 (608) 262-9777 Fax rrm@cs.wisc.edu Barbara Mitchell, M.S., MT(ASCP) Manager, AAFP-PT and Laboratory Issues American Academy of Family Physicians 11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway Leawood, KS 66211 (913) 906-6000, ext. 4140 (913) 906-6079 Fax bmitchel@aafp.org
- 92
-
Charles F. Mountain Vice President, Technology and Business Development Instrumentation Laboratory 101 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421 (781) 861-4453 (781) 861-4496 Fax cmountain@ilww.com Troy Nagle, M.D., Ph.D. Professor and Founding Chair North Carolina State University Biomedical Engineering University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill MacNider Hall, Room 152 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7575 (919) 515-3578 nagle@ncsu.edu Ronald Newbower, Ph.D. Strategic Director, Co-Founder, and Chief Technology Officer Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology Partners HealthCare System Suite 200 65 Landsdowne Street Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 768-8393 rnewbower@partners.org John S. Oakey, Ph.D., M.S. Optically Integrated Microfluidic Tools Metafluidics, Inc. 21508 Mountsfield Drive Golden, CO 80401 (303) 725-2584 (303) 725-2584 Fax oakey@metafluidics.com
Lucila Ohno-Machado, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Radiology and Health Sciences and Technology Department of Radiology Division of Health Sciences and Technology Brigham and Womens Hospital Harvard Medical School Massachusetts Institute of Technology DSG/BWH 75 Francis Street Boston, MA 01225 (617) 732-8543 machado@dsg.harvard.edu Anthony O. Okorodudu, Ph.D. Professor of Pathology Director, Clinical Chemistry Division Chair, IFCC Committee on Point of Care Testing Department of Pathology The University of Texas Medical Branch Route 0551 301 University Boulevard Galveston, TX 77555-0551 (409) 772-3309 (409) 772-9231 Fax aookorod@utmb.edu Thor Osborn, Ph.D. Team Lead Applied Micro-Analytical Systems Sandia National Laboratories MS 0892 P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87185-0892 (505) 845-8786 tdosbor@sandia.gov
- 93
-
Branko Palcic, Ph.D. Senior Scientist and Professor of Pathology and Physics Department of Cancer Imaging University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency 200-601 West Broadway Vancouver, BC V5Z 4C2 Canada (604) 877-6000, ext. 3037 (604) 708-1978 Fax bpalcic@bccancer.bc.ca Sunil D. Pandit, Ph.D. Special Programs Scientific Research Group Leader National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Institutes of Health Suite 9144 Rockledge Building 2 6701 Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 435-0513 (301) 480-1335 Fax spandit@mail.nih.gov Mary S. Pastel, Sc.D. Associate Director for Advanced In Vitro Diagnostics Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety and Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration HFZ-140 12720 Twinbrook Parkway Rockville, MD 20857 (301) 443-3314, ext. 160 (301) 443-9101 Fax mary.pastel@fda.hhs.gov Grace Peng, Ph.D. Program Director National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Suite 200 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 451-4778 penggr@mail.nih.gov
Roderic I. Pettigrew, M.D., Ph.D. Director National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Building 31, Room 1C-14 MSC 2281 31 Center Drive Bethesda, MD 20892-2281 (301) 496-8859 (301) 480-0679 Fax rpettigrew@nih.gov Arleen F. Pinkos Scientific Reviewer Office of in Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration HFZ-440 2098 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 (240) 276-0443, ext. 149 (240) 276-0652 Fax arleen.pinkos@fda.hhs.gov Jonas Alexander Pologe Chief Technology Officer Kestel Labs, Inc. Suite K 3131 Indian Road Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 544-0660 jpologe@kestrellabs.com Christopher P. Price, Ph.D., FACB, FRSC, FRCPath Visiting Professor in Clinical Biochemistry University of Oxford Glyn Garth Waines Road Daglingworth Cirencester GL7 7AN United Kingdom +44 1285 644105 chris1price2@aol.com
- 94
-
Donald S. Prough, M.D. Professor and Chair Department of Anesthesiology The University of Texas Medical Branch 301 University Boulevard Galveston, TX 77555-0591 (409) 772-2965 (409) 772-4166 Fax dsprough@utmb.edu Dena S. Puskin, Sc.D. Director Office for the Advancement of Telehealth Health Resources and Services Administration Parklawn Building, Room 7C-22 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 (301) 443-3682 (301) 443-1330 Fax dpuskin@hrsa.gov Jason Pyle, M.D., Sc.D. Chief Science Officer Pria Diagnostics Suite F 3475 Edison Way Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 298-9777, ext. 57 (650) 492-4047 Fax dana.schmidt@priadi.com Sudarsan Rachuri, Ph.D. Professor National Institute of Standards and Technology/George Washington University MS 8263 100 Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (301) 975-4264 sudarsan@nist.gov James Ralston, M.D., M.P.H. Assistant Investigator Center for Health Studies Group Health Cooperative Suite 1600 1730 Minor Avenue Seattle, WA 98102 (206) 287-2900 ralston.j@ghc.org
Ronald L. Rardin, Ph.D., M.P.A. Professor of Industrial Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 20222 (765) 494-5410 (765) 494-2351 Fax rardin@purdue.edu Avi Rasooly, Ph.D. Program Director National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Room 6035 6130 Executive Boulevard Rockville, MD 20892 (301) 435-9012 rasoolya@mail.nih.gov Indranill Basu Ray, M.D. Director, Center for Invasive Cardiac Electrophysiology Research Instructor in Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School Apartment 406 35 Harbor Point Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 (617) 308-0580 indranill_basuray@bidmc.harvard.edu Mary Lynn Realff, Ph.D., BSTE Program Director National Science Foundation Room 550 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22205 (703) 292-7088 (703) 292-9056 Fax mrealff@nsf.gov Matthew J. Realff, Ph.D. Program Officer National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-7081 mrealff@nsf.gov
- 95
-
Proctor Page Reid, Ph.D. Director Program Office National Academy of Engineering Room 1044 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 334-2815 (202) 334-2290 Fax preid@nae.edu Antonio J. Ricco, Ph.D. Director National Center for Space Biological Technologies Stanford University 101 Bacigalupi Drive Los Gatos, CA 95032 (408) 460-5666 (208) 545-1231 Fax ajricco@alum.mit.edu Rebecca Richards-Kortum, Ph.D. Professor and Chair Department of Bioengineering Rice University MS-142 6100 South Main Street Houston, TX 77005-1892 (713) 348-3823 (713) 348-5877 Fax rkortum@rice.edu Edwin Romeijn, Ph.D., M.S. Associate Professor Department of Industrial Engineering Department of Radiation Oncology (affiliate member) University of Florida Weil Hall, Room 303 P.O. Box 116595 Gainesville, FL 32611-6595 (352) 392-1464 (352) 392-3537 Fax romeijn@ise.ufl.edu
Enrique Saldivar, M.D., Ph.D., M.B.E. President and Chief Executive Officer Professor Rainmaker Technology, Inc. La Jolla Bioengineering Institute The Scripps Research Institute P.O. Box 712852 Santee, CA 92072 (619) 258-8956 rainmaker_tech@sbcglobal.net Reyad I. Sawafta, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer QuarTek Corporation 4180 Piedmont Parkway Greensboro, NC 27410 (336) 316-0088, ext. 202 (336) 316-0118 Fax rsawafta@quartekcorp.com Eric J. Seibel, Ph.D. Research Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering Adjunct in Department of Bioengineering Human Interface Technology Laboratory University of Washington Fluke Hall, Room 215 Box 352142 Seattle, WA 98195-2142 (206) 616-1486 (206) 543-5380 Fax eseibel@hitl.washington.edu Sudhir V. Shah, M.D., FACP Professor of Internal Medicine and Director Division of Nephrology Department of Internal Medicine College of Medicine University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Nephrology Section, Medicine Service John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Slot 501 4301 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72205 (501) 257-5832 (501) 257-5827 Fax shahsudhirv@uams.edu
- 96
-
Pam Sims, M.B.A. Analyst Infotonics Technology Center 5450 Campus Drive Canandaigua, NY 14424 (585) 919-3004 (585) 919-3011 Fax pam.sims@infotonics.org Suresh K. Sitaraman, Ph.D. Professor School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology 813 Ferst Drive Atlanta, GA 30332-0405 (404) 894-3405 (404) 894-9342 Fax suresh.sitaraman@me.gatech.edu Theresa Christine Smith National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Suite 200 6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 451-4784 smiththe@mail.nih.gov Steven Allan Soper, Ph.D. Professor Director Center for BioModular Multi-Scale Systems Department of Chemistry Department of Mechanical Engineering Louisiana State University Choppin Hall, Room 232 Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (225) 578-1527 (225) 578-3458 Fax chsope@lsu.edu
James B. Speer, Ph.D. Director, Rural Health Research and Policy Analysis F. Marie Hall Institute for Rural and Community Health Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center 3601 Fourth Street Lubbock, TX 79430 (806) 743-1338 (806) 743-4510 Fax james.speer@ttuhsc.edu Richard N. Spivack, Ph.D. Healthcare Economist National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (301) 975-5063 (301) 975-4776 Fax richard.spivack@nist.gov Justin Starren, M.D., Ph.D., FACMI Associate Professor Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Radiology Columbia University Medical Center VC-5 622 West 168th Street New York, NY 10032 (212) 305-3443 starren@dbmi.columbia.edu Patrick St-Louis, Ph.D. Biochemist Director, Point-of-Care Testing Clinical Associate Professor Department of Clinical Biochemistry Saint Justine Hospital 3175 Cote Saint Catherine Montreal, QC H3T 1C5 Canada +514 345 4931, ext. 5646 +514 345 4803 Fax patrick_st-louis@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
- 97
-
Kumar Subramanian, M.S. President Phoenix Biosystem, Inc. 6833 Corte Munras Pleasanton, CA 94566 (925) 998-5075 kumar@phoenixbiosystem.com Lakshminarayanan Subramanian, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Computer Science Department Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University and Intel Research, Berkeley Apartment 205 1322 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, CA 94709 (510) 495-3089 lakshmi@cs.nyu.edu Mingui Sun, Ph.D. Associate Professor
Departments of Neurosurgery, Bioengineering,
and Electrical Engineering University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh University Hospital Suite B-400 Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (412) 648-9234 (412) 383-8999 Fax mrsun@neuronet.pitt.edu Cha-Mei Tang, Sc.D., M.S. President and Chief Executive Officer Creatv MicroTech, Inc. 11609 Lake Potomac Drive Potomac, MD 20854 (301) 983-1650 cmtang@creatvmicrotech.com Ben Taylor Vice President, Business Development Pria Diagnostics Suite F 3475 Edison Way Menlo Park, CA 94025 (650) 298-9777, ext. 59 (650) 492-4047 Fax dana.schmidt@priadi.com
Kai Erik Thomenius, Ph.D., M.S. Chief Technologist, Ultrasound and Biomedical Imaging Technologies GE Global Research KW-C300A 1 Research Circle Niskayuna, NY 12309 (518) 387-7233 (518) 387-6170 thomeniu@research.ge.com Tomasz Tkaczyk, Ph.D. Assistant Research Professor College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona 1630 East University Boulevard Tucson, AZ 85721 (520) 626-8837 (520) 621-9104 Fax ttkaczyk@optics.arizona.edu Mehmet Toner, Ph.D. Professor of Biomedical Engineering Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Division of Health Sciences and Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Shriners Hospital 51 Blossom Street Boston, MA 02114 (617) 371-4883 mehmet_toner@hms.harvard.edu Christian Paul Valcke, Ph.D. Vice President, Research and Development Nanomix Suite 600 5980 Horton Street Emeryville, CA 94608 (510) 428-5300 cvalcke@nano.com
- 98
-
Vijay K. Varadan, Ph.D. Walton Endowed Chair and Distinguished Professor of Electrical Engineering and Neurosurgery Department of Neurosurgery University of Arkansas and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Room 1610 700 Research Center Boulevard Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-2873 (479) 575-6870 Fax vjvesm@engr.uark.edu Frank Wang, Ph.D. President BioMachines, Inc. Suite 100 615 Davis Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (919) 360-9620 fwang@bio-machines.com Steve Warren, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kansas State University Rathbone Hall, Room 2061 Manhattan, KS 66506 (785) 532-4644 (785) 532-1188 Fax swarren@ksu.edu Anthony D. Watson, M.S., M.B.A. Chief General Hospital Devices Branch Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration HFZ-480 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 (301) 594-1287, ext. 169 (301) 480-3002 Fax anthony.watson@fda.hhs.gov
Leonard Winchester, Ph.D. Chief Scientist CW Optics, Inc. 1103 Moore House Road Yorktown, VA 23690 (757) 872-4000 (757) 872-4434 Fax lww@cwoptics.com Adam T. Woolley, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602-5700 (801) 422-1701 atw99@byu.edu Thomas Wright, M.D. Professor Department of Pathology Columbia University Medical Center P & S 16-402 630 West 168th Street New York, NY 10032-3702 (212) 305-1993 tcw1@columbia.edu Huikai Xie, Ph.D., M.S. Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Biomedical Engineering Biophotonics and Microsystems Laboratory Shands Cancer Center University of Florida Benton Hall, Room 221 P.O. Box 116200 Gainesville, FL 32611 (352) 846-0441 hkx@ufl.edu Kaiming Ye, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Biomedical Engineering Program College of Engineering University of Arkansas Engineering Hall, Room 203 Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-5315 kye@uark.edu
- 99
-
Xiangqun Zeng, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Chemistry Oakland University Science and Engineering Building, Room 231 Rochester, MI 48309 (248) 370-2881 (248) 370-2321 Fax zeng@oakland.edu
Xiaojing Zhang, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Biomedical Engineering Microelectronics Research Center The University of Texas at Austin Engineering-Science Building, Room 12 C0800 1 University Station Austin, TX 78758-0238 (512) 475-6872 (512) 471-0616 Fax john.zhang@engr.utexas.edu
- 100
-
Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership, A Joint National Academy of Engineering/Institute of Medicine Study
1
National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC, 2School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 3JFK School Health Care Project, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Research Objectives. To identify engineering applications with the potential for significantly improving the quality and productivity of health care delivery, factors that affect the deployment of these applications, and research priorities in engineering and other fields to advance performance in health care delivery. Approach. A committee of 14 experts from engineering and health care fields, supported by National Academies staff and National Academy of Engineering postdoctoral fellows, reviewed the relevant research literature, conducted site visits, took expert testimony, and convened two fact-finding workshops involving 68 researchers and practitioners from engineering, health care, and management to examine challenges and opportunities for application of systems engineering tools, information/communication technologies, and various fields of engineering research. The committee prepared a consensus report, including findings and recommendations and 38 individually authored papers of workshop presenters. Significant Results. Specific systems engineering tools for design, analysis, and control and information and communication technologies with potential to improve care delivery processes and outcomes at all levels of the health care system are identified. Important opportunities and challenges for research in engineering and related fields are identified as are opportunities for cross-disciplinary education in health care, engineering, and management. Broader Impact. Public- and private-sector action on the reports recommendations to (1) advance development, adaptation, and widespread application of identified systems engineering tools and information technologies to health care delivery, (2) expand engineering and related multidisciplinary research in areas identified, and (3) implement changes in the education of engineers, health care professionals, and managers has the potential to radically improve the quality and productivity of health care delivery in America.