The Devil's Tickets, by Gary M. Pomerantz - Excerpt
The Devil's Tickets, by Gary M. Pomerantz - Excerpt
The Devil's Tickets, by Gary M. Pomerantz - Excerpt
A l s o b y G a ry M . P o m e r a n t z
Wilt, 1962:
The Night of 100 Points and the Dawn of a New Era
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page iii
ThD e v i l
’s
T
TI C K E T S
A Nigh
t of B
ridge,
a Fata
l Hand
and a ,
New A
merica
n Age
GAR
Y M
. PO
ME RAN
TZ
Pomerantz, Gary M.
The devil’s tickets / Gary M. Pomerantz. — 1st ed.
p. cm.
1. Bennett, Myrtle, d. 1992. 2. Reed, James A. (James Alexander), 1861–1944.
3. Culbertson, Ely, 1891–1955. 4. Murder— Missouri— Kansas City— Case studies.
5. Man-woman relationships— Missouri— Kansas City— Case studies. 6. Contract
bridge— Social aspects— Missouri— Kansas City— History— 20th century. 7. Bennett,
Myrtle, d. 1992— Trials, litigation, etc. 8. Trials (Murder)— Missouri— Kansas City.
9. Kansas City (Mo.)— Biography. 10. United States— Social life and customs—
1918–1945. I. Title.
HV6534.K2P66 2008
364.152'3092— dc22
2008051185
ISBN 978-1-4000-5162-5
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
First Edition
www.CrownPublishing.com
To purchase a copy of
The Devil’s Tickets
visit one of these online retailers:
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Borders
IndieBound
Powell’s Books
Random House
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page v
For Mom
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page vii
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page ix
CONTENTS
Author’s Note.................................................................................xi
Introduction..................................................................................xiii
PART I: THE BRIDGE STORM 1929–1932
One: Ely and Jo .........................................................................................3
Two: Myrtle and Jack ..............................................................................24
Three: Ely’s Grand Scheme.....................................................................41
Four: Four Spades She Bid......................................................................51
Five: Myrtle’s Blur...................................................................................65
Six: Senator Reed Comes Home...............................................................70
Seven: Ely and Jo: Stars on the Rise........................................................82
Eight: The Senator and Mrs. Donnelly ..................................................94
Nine: Myrtle’s Murder Trial, Part 1 ......................................................101
Ten: Ely in the Crucible .........................................................................120
Eleven: Myrtle’s Murder Trial, Part 2..................................................134
Twelve: Bridge Battle of the Century....................................................155
Thirteen: Myrtle’s Murder Trial, Part 3..............................................175
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page x
x Contents
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page xi
author’s note
Bridge mavens who enter here, I beg your indulgence. For while this
is a story about the great game, it is not the great game’s story. As you
enter a bygone era and follow the glamour and drama of the Culbert-
sons and Bennetts, you won’t need to know the finer points of bridge.
For those coming late to the game with their curiosity roused, I offer
a brief bridge primer and a glossary of terms, beginning on page 247.
I hurry to say that no such primer is called for by this story. It is a tale
of husbands and wives. You know the rules by which that game is
played.
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page xiii
introduction
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page xiv
xiv Introduction
Myrtle Adkins more than a little of Lorelei Lee. Myrtle came out of
Arkansas and became a stenographer. Like Lorelei, she had the look
that caused men to take another look. Though a brunette (in this
case, a grand exception to the Loos rule), Myrtle stopped conversa-
tions by doing no more than entering a room. That, she knew. That,
she counted on. And just as Lorelei leaves Arkansas behind, so
Myrtle left behind the dusty Arkansas farmland of Tillar.
Unlike Lorelei, Myrtle needed only one man. She even knew the
man she wanted. When she spotted him, she moved quickly. With Jack
Bennett she would create a life of relative luxury in Kansas City— until
one night, as Lorelei does, Myrtle raised a gun against her man.
It happened around a bridge table in 1929, and to this day it is a
flashpoint in the history of the card game that in the late twenties
became— along with flagpole sitting, marathon dancing, transconti-
nental foot racing, and swimming pool endurance floating— yet
another of America’s national crazes.
Of all the mad games that cheered Americans between the world
wars, the least likely must have been contract bridge. Descended from
whist, the game of English origins that had captivated Napoleon, Tal-
leyrand, and Thomas Jefferson, bridge was as much an intellectual
exercise as a game, its language a rigid code that conveyed informa-
tion to a partner about the 13 cards in his hand, one arrangement of
the 635,013,559,600 possibilities.
How quaint that sounds today: bridge as a phenomenon. When
Shipwreck Kelly sat atop flagpoles for days, America cheered the
sheer lunacy of it. But bridge? Genteel, civil bridge? Four people at a
table for hours? Whose idea of fun was that?
It was Ely Culbertson’s. An elegant showman, he created on a
large scale the milieu in which the Bennetts came to the table on that
last night. Born in Romania and raised in Russia, the son of an Ameri-
can father and Cossack mother, Culbertson presented himself as suave
and debonair, a tuxedoed boulevardier. He used mystique, brilliance,
and a certain madness to transform bridge from a friendly social activ-
ity to a national cultural movement that made him rich and famous.
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page xv
Introduction xv
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page xvi
xvi Introduction
because, ideally, partners will act as one, thinking alike and waging an
intellectual battle totally without ego.
But the ideal can break down with the smallest of misinterpreta-
tions of a partner’s bids, and the opportunity for error is always there.
In a single bridge hand, the number of significant decisions a player
makes can reach well into double digits. In poker, a player’s failure is
his alone (though, naturally, he usually passes it on to the fall of the
cards). But bridge is unique in that it gives a player another way to
explain his defeat. He can lay blame across the table.
That is petty of him, of course, because whatever glory or despair
comes to the partnership is equal property of both. Points, after all,
are scored not by individuals, but by the partnerships. Yet missteps,
real or perceived, can break a partnership’s concentration, egos can
rise to the fore, and a sense of betrayal can blow like an icy north
wind flowing to the south.
The best partners are personally compatible and roughly equals
in ability. A mismatched nonspousal partnership can end with a sim-
ple word of regret, but a married partnership is more problematic.
Generally, a husband and wife keep slogging through the tribulations,
carried along by their personal compatibility. Not every marriage can
stand up to the passions of an intense competition, though. Trouble
arrives, and is doubled, when partners mismatched at bridge bring to
the table the flaws of their married life. Culbertson knew this, and
feasted upon it, even as he extolled the game’s magnificent virtues.
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page xvii
Introduction xvii
ica’s media history, talkies were new, radio was in its infancy, and
newspapers competed fiercely for an audience. With all this came an
insatiable hunger for story, the more sensational the better. Because
(as P. T. Barnum once said) no one ever went broke underestimating
the taste of the American public, the marketing pitches of the day
were skewed toward the breathless and hyperbolic, as seen through
the prism of the ruling sex, the male.
Once, the famous movie producer Irving Thalberg told Anita
Loos how to write about women in her Hollywood scenarios: “When
you write a love scene, think of your heroine as a little puppy dog,
cuddling up to her master, wagging an imaginary tail, and gazing at
him as if he were God.” Thalberg was talking to the wrong woman, of
course. From her own marriage, Loos had learned which sex was truly
stronger. Once, she found, in her husband’s wardrobe drawer, secreted
behind socks, a woman’s love letter. When her husband tearfully con-
fessed to the affair, Loos allowed him to stay with her.
In those times, Amelia Earhart became “Lady Lindy,” Marlene
Dietrich dressed in top hat and tails, and Dorothy Parker traded
barbs with the men at the Algonquin hotel’s “Round Table.” All were
women of achievement, icons by virtue of their rarity, and yet their
work was nearly always judged from a male viewpoint. No matter
how individualistic and daring Earhart was in the sky, reporters
pigeonholed her as merely a female version of Charles Lindbergh.
Beautiful and sultry, even in her men’s formal wear, Dietrich played a
scene in Morocco in which she kisses a woman. The acerbic poet
Parker sat with writers Heywood Broun, Alexander Woollcott,
Robert Benchley, and George S. Kaufman, tossing off witticisms every
bit as cutting as theirs, such as her line on coeds at the Yale prom: “If
all the girls in attendance were laid end to end . . . I wouldn’t be at all
surprised.” For such boldness, male critics disparaged Dietrich and
Parker as unseemly and scandalous.
For women at home, those housewives whose achievements went
unnoticed, a sociable game of bridge offered a place at the table
where, by dint of their intelligence and skill, they could prove they
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page xviii
xviii Introduction
were the equals of men, if not their superiors. But many husbands
were not ready to follow their wives’ lead or to view them in anything
but a subordinate role. Culbertson’s marketing genius was that he
positioned his game as a challenge to women, a dare, really. If a
woman truly wanted equality, she had only to buy a deck of cards—
and, of course, his books of bridge instruction.
Perhaps as an unintended consequence, though just as likely
the shrewdest part of his marketing, Culbertson took advantage of the
tension in marriage that is eternal. How much more interesting, he
thought, if the game became a war of the sexes.
Myrtle Bennett would be North to Jack’s South. The Culbert-
sons, Ely and Jo, would be the game’s king and queen. Spouses,
lovers, enemies— these four were all those as the raucous twenties
dissolved into the silence of the Depression. Their lives and the game
they played became a single story beginning in 1929.
This is that story.
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 1
PA R T 1
1929–1932
Before the Culbertsons made their challenge, the titans of bridge stood
shoulder to shoulder on a New York rooftop in 1928 (from left to right):
Milton Work, R. F. Foster, E. V. Shepard, Sidney Lenz, Wilbur White-
head, Gratz Scott. American Contract Bridge League, Memphis, TN
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 2
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 3
one
Ely and Jo
I.
New York City in the twenties was a melting pot of seven million, full
of show, big and brawling, an industrial behemoth with enough smoke-
stacks and skyscrapers to fill the skylines of a dozen cities. F. Scott
Fitzgerald, who wrote of young love and glittery tea dances, as the
twenties dawned, suggested New York City had “all the iridescence
of the beginning of the world.” Its streets swelled with noises of the
Old World mixing with the New: gramophones, gangster gunfire,
European accents, tinkling champagne glasses, backfiring Model
Ts, and tabloid newsboys hawking the sensational. In these high
times, New Yorkers could rush to Broadway to see Al Jolson and
Eddie Cantor— known to their Eastern European parents as Asa
Yoelson and Israel Iskowitz— or thrill to the last acts of the amazing
Harry Houdini, born in Hungary as Erik Weisz. They could read a
dozen and more local dailies, choose from among thirty thousand
speakeasies, marvel as the big-bellied Babe Ruth launched home runs
at Yankee Stadium, and see their Democratic governor, the derby-
hatted Al Smith, passing through the five boroughs on his way (he
hoped) to the White House. Alive and thrumming at street level, the
city teemed with gangsters, ad agency pitchmen (selling sex, Sex,
SEX!), Wall Street fat cats, socialists and garment district workers,
café society personalities and cynical, self-absorbed writers sitting at
the Algonquin Round Table thinking up laugh lines. A constellation
of celebrities brightened the Prohibition-era night, from the brassy
hostess Texas Guinan, who with her pancake makeup and jangling
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 4
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 5
Ely and Jo 5
begat another tabloid, the Daily Mirror, which arrived in 1922 prom-
ising “90 percent entertainment, 10 percent information”; a few
years later came the next, the New York Evening Graphic. These
tabloids took the bygone yellow journalism of Hearst and Pulitzer,
Spanish-American War vintage, circa 1898, and ripened it. New York
pulsed with a thousand wars in miniature— social, cultural, legal,
and, best of all, marital— and the tabloids used them all to their
advantage. They reveled in stories of debauchery, extramarital affairs,
abortions, murders, union battles along the Bowery, mob violence,
heroism, hedonism, mayhem, threats, controversies, and dynamic
courtroom trials.
Winchell was an indefatigable, ink-stained gadfly who, as a
columnist first for the Evening Graphic (a lowbrow daily ridiculed by
competitors as the “Pornographic”) and then for Hearst’s Daily Mir-
ror, seized upon gossip and turned it into his own high art of bally-
hoo. Like the tabloids that launched him, Winchell was abrupt, catty,
and always hustling. A night owl, he wrote about Broadway person-
alities and turned his flashlight upon their tangled, often secretive
romances. He challenged the traditional standards of journalistic
good taste, maddening competing newspapers and his own editors,
who were often unsure whether to publish his latest unverified piece
of gossip. Winchell finessed his way around potential libel suits by
creating his own “slanguage,” a vernacular of the streets, breezy and
colloquial. He wrote of secret lovebirds who were “Adam-and-
Eveing it” and of a man who felt “that way” about a woman as they
awaited “the blessed event.” A mention in Winchell’s column was
greatly coveted, and feared. The column had a chatty cadence, a
rapid song-and-dance-man’s beat. He dropped names, often of
celebrity writers, when possible: “At the opening of a play recently
Baird Leonard turned to Dorothy Parker and said, ‘Are you Dorothy
Parker?’ and Dorothy replied, ‘Yes— do you mind?’ ” Winchell
reacted physically to gossip, and one observer noted that he “seemed
to purr with delight when he had a particularly juicy item . . . He was
as fascinated and unself-conscious as a four-year-old making mud-
pies.” Ben Hecht thought Winchell wrote “like a man honking in a
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 6
traffic jam.” There were other gossip artists at work in New York, but
none so widely read, or so intensely despised. The actress Ethel Barry-
more, who feuded with Winchell, would say, “It is a sad commentary
on American manhood that Walter Winchell is allowed to exist.”
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 7
Ely and Jo 7
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 8
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 9
Ely and Jo 9
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 10
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 11
Ely and Jo 11
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 12
II.
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 13
Ely and Jo 13
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 14
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 15
Ely and Jo 15
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 16
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 17
Ely and Jo 17
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 18
all spoiled. He sat alone one night at the Beaux Arts restaurant with a
bottle of champagne and his despair. Guinan happened by his table
and noticed Jo’s absence: “Why the gloom, Ely? Did someone mis-
play a hand?”
But he was determined not to give up on Jo Dillon. He went to
Saratoga, put an arm around her, and kissed her. She did not resist
him, but she said, “Ely, I love you, but I will not marry you.” Ely’s
heart leaped: he was still in the game.
Now it was late summer, 1922. They conceived an idea to
become America’s best bridge pair, and began a period of intensive
training, spending hours each night fine-tuning their partnership.
They created a mutual understanding of bids, discussed the impon-
derables of bridge psychology. Then they tested their theories, and
their system, Thursday nights at the Knickerbocker, returning after-
ward to Jo’s apartment and working from memory to re-create the
hands dealt and played. They made exhaustive notes, analyzed errors.
It was during these times when Ely became his most ruthless. Into the
wee hours, Jo’s living room filled with cigarette smoke and Ely’s sav-
age criticisms, until finally Jo, in tears, pushed her chair from the
table and shouted, “You’re a bridge monster! I’ll never play with you
again!”
If Ely’s intellect amazed Jo, his intensity frightened her. The mem-
ory of such explosive bridge table experiences would melt away, but
they would help Ely define early on the imperative of partnership
cooperation: “This question of morale is automatically solved for
those who realize that partnership is simply a sporting proposition,”
he wrote. “We are drawn together for better or worse and therefore
like true pals should stand by cheerfully and courageously.” He also
created a standing rule: “Never reproach your partner if there be the
slightest thing for which you can reproach yourself.” At the table he
began to treat Jo with deference, and their courtship deepened.
As time passed, Jo came to believe that, among married couples
playing as bridge partners, there were three types: (1) those who
quarreled everywhere, including at bridge; (2) those who quarreled
nowhere, except at bridge; and (3) those who quarreled everywhere,
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 19
Ely and Jo 19
but never at bridge. She and Ely therefore agreed never to discuss a
hand while sitting at the bridge table.
They married the following June. The experts in the Knicker-
bocker’s third-floor inner sanctum were aghast, especially Whitey.
(Two years later, he founded the Cavendish Club in New York City
and invited Jo to join— as long as she promised to keep her husband
out.) On the signed affidavit for a wedding license, Ely, too ashamed
to define his occupation as “gambler at cards,” instead scrawled, “oil
business,” borrowing from his father’s former profession. Jo cited her
occupation as “bridge expert.” He was thirty-two, she twenty-five.
On the affidavit, Jo also cited her divorce in March 1921. Of her first
husband, she wrote simply, “dead 1922.” Perhaps to protect her own
good name, she added a single word, crammed into the tight space
above her signature: Plaintiff. Jo wanted it known that she, not her
first husband, had filed the divorce papers.
The Culbertsons married at the Holy Cross Church in New York
City, with Father Duffy presiding. Jo’s mother, Sarah McCarthy Mur-
phy, served as maid of honor, and Ely’s father, Almon, as best man.
Ely bought a thin platinum wedding ring with tiny diamonds, on the
installment plan, and promised Jo an enormous square-cut solitaire.
The longer she waited, he assured her, the larger the diamond. (He
would deliver an impressive solitaire ten years later.) He also gave Jo
a small jewel box. It was empty, of course, but one day he promised it
would hold a beautiful honeymoon on the isle of Capri, a lovely
country home, an engagement ring, sables, minks, and diamonds.
They honeymooned at a motel in nearby Long Beach, an inexpensive
seashore resort. They drank champagne and walked along the beach.
She encouraged him— as a bridge player, as a writer, as a man:
“You’re better than you think you are.”
“Jo-Jotte, I’ll make you the happiest woman in the world,” Ilya
Culbertson promised his Galatea on their honeymoon. And then he
amended, “At least in spots.”
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 20
well-to-do. The game even found its way into popular literature. In a
1926 short story for Red Book magazine, “The Rich Boy,” F. Scott
Fitzgerald wrote of a young Yale man playing a casual game with
friends at the Everglades Club in Palm Beach; the same year, Heming-
way’s Jake Barnes, in The Sun Also Rises, plays three-handed bridge
with friends in Spain en route to watch the bulls run at Pamplona.
As late as 1925, contract bridge was hardly known, and played
only experimentally. Its evolution dated back more than two cen-
turies to whist, which rose in Britain during the first half of the eigh-
teenth century from relative obscurity, and from earlier games known
as triumph, ruff and honours, and whisk and swabbers. Played at the
outset in servants’ quarters, or “below stairs,” the game soon gained
popularity among elites. In 1742, the London barrister turned whist
instructor Edmond Hoyle (of the phrase “according to Hoyle”) pub-
lished his seminal A Short Treatise on the Game of Whist, Containing
the Laws of the Game, and Also Some Rules Whereby a Beginner
May, with Due Attention to Them, Attain to the Playing It Well.
In the United States and Europe, auction bridge appealed to
Anglophiles and other cosmopolites who might have imagined them-
selves as knights and ladies keeping alive the grand tradition of a
whist-based game; in 1912, four such devotees, passengers aboard
the Titanic, were playing auction bridge when the ship struck ice.
In 1925, though, the millionaire yachtsman Harold S. Vander-
bilt, great-grandson of the famed Commodore, decided on revolution
at the bridge table. Enough of auction. Its predictability was second
only to its bidding dullness. On a cruise ship voyage through the
Panama Canal, Vanderbilt, with time to tinker, smoking his pipe and
wearing his pince-nez, energized the scoring table and came up with a
sophisticated plan for the evolving game of contract bridge that, in his
mind, would cause a competitor’s heart to beat faster even as a thinker’s
mind created solutions to problems never before faced at the table.
Here was the essential difference between auction and contract:
In contract bridge, only the tricks bid for, and made, were counted
toward winning an all-important game. To earn full rewards, sides
now would have to take risks by bidding for higher contracts. In auc-
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 21
Ely and Jo 21
Short on cash, Ely took a train west to Los Angeles in the summer of
1927, and set himself up in the Biltmore Hotel. There he taught an
auction bridge class with twenty students, predominantly women
from Pasadena and Los Angeles. Jo joined him in California, and dur-
ing a visit to Santa Barbara they heard for the first time about con-
tract bridge, the new rage of New York.
In Santa Barbara, Ely and Jo played Vanderbilt’s contract for the
first time, and the game’s faster pace and enhanced scoring thrilled
Ely. “Contract will sweep the country,” he told Jo.
He returned to New York convinced that if he could develop a
set of rules that would enable a novice to learn an otherwise complex
game in a matter of a few weeks, then he could make contract bridge,
and its adherents, entirely, and profitably, his. He decided that about
70 percent of his established rules for auction bridge would apply to
contract. He would study the rest, and apply his science.
Back in New York, Ely and Jo organized a regular contract
bridge game at their apartment on East Sixty-third Street. They sought
to sell the game to men of the Knickerbocker inner sanctum, knowing
they were hidebound and resistant to any game but auction, their safe
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 22
In the summer of 1928, Ely and Jo spent time at Hal and Dorothy
Sims’s ten-acre estate, a lush, wide-open space with bridges and lakes,
in Deal, New Jersey, about sixty miles from Manhattan. The Sims
place had become like a sleepaway camp for the Knickerbocker Whist
Club’s best players. The big house, with its porches, slept about forty,
though hardly anyone there seemed to sleep. Bridge-playing guests
showed up at all hours, ready to cut into the two-cent, five-cent, and
ten-cent tables. Games lasted through the night. If a player left for a
train or to go to bed, another would appear. One night a thunder-
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:18 PM Page 23
Ely and Jo 23
storm struck with fury: windows burst open, lamps and knickknacks
crashed onto card tables, electricity failed, and rooms went dark.
Dorothy Sims rose in terror from her bed and raced downstairs.
There, she found her husband and young Johnny Rau of Columbia
University playing against von Zedtwitz and Vanderbilt, plodding
players who abhorred snap judgments. In the darkness, someone lit a
match at the table, and Vanderbilt, barely illuminated, turned from
his cards and said, “Whose bid is it?”
Some guests stayed a day; others stayed weeks, prompting the
wise-cracking Dorothy Sims to place an ancestral coat of arms above
the front door that read guests and fish stink after the third
day. The Simses held tournaments every few days. Once, Hal Sims
came to the table an hour early, saying he hoped to “get in a little
cards” before the tournament began. Sunday nights were especially
popular because fried chicken was delivered by a neighboring farmer,
typically at the last minute, when twenty bridge-playing guests
showed up without warning. “Bridge sharks multiply like rabbits. I
prefer rabbits,” Dorothy Sims would write. “They’re less choosy.
They’re less sensitive.”
www.CrownPublishing.com
Pome_9781400051625_3p_all_r3.qxp:. 4/6/09 3:19 PM Page 301
www.CrownPublishing.com
To purchase a copy of
The Devil’s Tickets
visit one of these online retailers:
Amazon
Barnes & Noble
Borders
IndieBound
Powell’s Books
Random House
www.CrownPublishing.com