Bacteriocin
Bacteriocin
Bacteriocin
Bacteriocins are proteinaceous toxins produced by bacteria to inhibit the growth of similar or closely
related bacterial strain(s). They are typically considered to be narrow spectrum antibiotics, though this
has been debated [1] They are phenomenologically analogous to yeast and paramecium killing factors,
and are structurally, functionally, and ecologically diverse. Bacteriocins were first discovered by A.
Gratia in 1925.[2][3] He was involved in the process of searching for ways to kill bacteria, which also
resulted in the development of antibiotics and the discovery of bacteriophage, all within a span of a few
years. He called his first discovery a colicine because it killed E. coli.
Classification of bacteriocins
Bacteriocins are categorized in several ways, including producing strain, common resistance
mechanisms, and mechanism of killing. There are several large categories of bacteriocin which are only
phenomenologically related. These include the bacteriocins from gram-positive bacteria, the colicins [4],
the microcins, and the bacteriocins from Archaea. The bacteriocins from E. coli are called colicins
(formerly called 'colicines,' meaning 'coli killers'). They are the longest studied bacteriocins. They are a
diverse group of bacteriocins and do not include all the bacteriocins produced by E. coli. For example
the bacteriocins produced by Staphylococcus warneri, are called as warnerin[5] or warnericin. In fact,
one of the oldest known so-called colicins was called colicin V and is now know as microcin V. It is
much smaller and produced and secreted in a different manner than the classic colicins. The bacteriocins
of lactic acid-fermenting bacteria are called lantibiotics. This naming system is problematic for a number
of reasons. First, naming bacteriocins by what they putatively kill would be more accurate if their killing
spectrum were contiguous with genus or species designations. The bacteriocins frequently possess
spectra that exceed the bounds of their named taxa and almost never kill the majority of the taxa for
which they are named. Further, the original naming is generally derived not from the sensitive strain the
bacteriocin kills, but instead the organism that produces the bacteriocin. This makes the use of this
naming system a problematic basis for theory; thus the alternative classification systems.
Methods of classification
Alternative methods of classification include: method of killing (pore forming, dnase, nuclease, murein
production inhibition, etc), genetics (large plasmids, small plasmids, chromosomal), molecular weight
and chemistry (large protein, polypeptide, with/without sugar moiety, containing atypical amino acids
like lanthionine) and method of production (ribosomal, post ribosomal modifications, non-ribosomal).
One method of classification fits the bacteriocins into Class I, Class IIa/b/c, and Class III. [6]
Class I bacteriocins
The class I bacteriocins are small peptide inhibitors and include nisin.
Class II bacteriocins
The class II bacteriocins are small heat-stable proteins. The class IIa bacteriocins (pediocin-like
bacteriocins) are the largest subgroup and contain an N-terminal consensus sequence -Tyr-Gly-Asn-Gly-
Val-Xaa-Cys across this group. The C-terminal is responsible for species-specific activity, causing cell-
leakage by permeabilizing the target cell wall. Class IIa bacteriocins have a large potential for use in
food preservation as well medical applications, due to their strong anitlisterial activity, and broad range
of activity. The class IIb bacteriocins (two-peptide bacteriocins) require two different peptides for
activity. Other bacteriocins can be grouped together as Class IIc (circular bacteriocins). These have a
wide range of effects on membrane permeability, cell wall formation and pheromone actions of target
cells.
Abstract
A total of 220 strains of LAB isolated from 32 samples of traditional fermented food from Senegal were
screened for bacteriocin production. Two bacteriocin producers, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and
Enterococcus faecium, were identified from 12 bacteriocin-producing isolates on the basis of phenotypic
analyses and 16S rDNA sequence. Both bacteriocins produced by new isolates show antimicrobial
activity against Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus coagulans whereas only that produced by
Lactococcus lactis has an activity against Bacillus cereus. Bacteriocin-producing Lactococcus lactis
strains were found in a variety of traditional foods indicating a high potential of growth of this strain in
variable ecological complex environment. Partial 16S rDNA of the two bacteriocin producers obtained
in this study has been registered to Genbank databases under the accession number AY971748 for
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (named CWBI-B1410) and AY971749 for Enterococcus faecium
(named CWBI-B1411). The new bacteriocin-producing Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strain has been
selected for identification and application of the bacteriocin to food preservation.
1. Introduction
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the biological basis for the production of a great multitude of fermented
foods (Lasagno et al., 2002). The most important contribution of these bacteria to fermented products is
to preserve the nutritive qualities of the raw material and inhibit the growth of spoilage and pathogenic
bacteria (Matilla-Sandholm et al., 1999). This inhibition may be due to the production of many
metabolites such as organic acids (lactic and acetic acid), hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl and bacteriocins
(Ennahar et al., 2000 ; Lasagno et al., 2002). Some bacteriocins kill only bacteria belonging to the same
species as producer whereas other bacteriocins kill a broad range of Gram positive bacteria (Conventry
et al., 1997 ; Ennahar et al., 2000 ; Mc Auliffe et al., 2001 ; Garneau et al., 2002). The incorporation of
these compounds as biopreservative ingredient into model food has been shown to be effective in the
control of pathogenic and spoilage micro-organisms (O'Sullivan et al., 2002). They have attracted
considerable interest in recent years and several works have focused on the isolation and development of
new strains of bacteriocin-producing bacteria. The detection rate of bac+ strains from LAB isolates can
be as low as 0.2% and therefore needs a large number of isolates from food sources (Conventry et al.,
1997).
The preservation of foods by lactic fermentation has a long history of use in Africa. The multitude of
products can be an appropriate ecological habitat for holding wild strains of LAB capable of producing
bacteriocin. The aim of the current study was to select bacteriocin-producing LAB from such products in
order to use these proteinaceous inhibitors to improve the microbial quality and safety of foods.
MRS1 agar (MRS with 0.1% glucose, and 50 µg/ml of cycloheximide) and M17m agar (0.5% glucose
and 50 µg/ml cycloheximide) were utilised for isolation of bacteria from food sources. Different food-
borne pathogens and Gram+ bacteria including Escherichia coli, Salmonella infantis, Salmonella
typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus curvatus from CWBI
collection were used as sensitive. Strains of Lactobacillus curvatus are found to be the most suitable
indicator for the quantification of antimicrobial effects of all bacteriocins investigated in both agar and
broth system (Conventry et al., 1997).
Strains were isolated from a total of 32 samples of traditional foods from Senegal (Table 1).
Lactic acid bacteria were isolated from samples, by direct plating on MRS1 or M17m. A 10% (w/v) food
sample in diluent [0.1% (w/v) peptone] was homogenized and 10-fold serially diluted. Plates of serial
dilution in MRS1 and M17m media were incubated anaerobically (BD, BBL Campypak microaeroplilic
systems Envelopes, Sparks, USA) for 48 h at 30°C. Plates providing a total of 300 colonies were
overlaid with a set of 6 indicators and incubated at 37°C for 12 h. Colonies producing zones of growth
inhibition in the indicator lawn were isolated from within the agar, inoculated into broth media (MRS1
or M17m) and incubated for 24 h at 30°C. Culture supernatant was prepared as follows: an overnight
culture of each isolate was centrifuged at 8,000 r.p.m. The resulting supernatant was neutralized (pH 6.5)
with NaOH 5N, sterilized by filtering with acrodisc (pore size 0.22 µm) and assayed for the presence of
an inhibitor in the broth following the Agar well diffusion assay (WDA) technique (Barefoot et al.,
1983) as follows. Molten agar was first seeded with indicator organism (110 µl of overnight culture per
20 ml of agar) in sterile Petri dishes, and after solidification, dried for 15 min. under flow hood. Wells of
uniform diameter (6 mm) were bored in the agar. Aliquots (60 µl) of the cell-free supernatant (CFS)
were dispensed in wells, and plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. Inhibition of growth was
determined by an area of inhibition surrounding each agar well.
To confirm the bacteriocin effect, catalase (65 UI/ml) was added to CFS and the technique was repeated.
The effect of various enzymes and heat treatment of CFS activity were also investigated. Units and MIC
(Minimum inhibitory concentration): the activity present in the neutralized (pH 6.5) cell-free supernatant
of producing cultures was determined by twofold serial dilution of the supernatant in sterile phosphate
buffer pH 6 (Barefoot et al., 1983). Activity units per milliliter (AU/ml) were determined as the inverse
of the last dilution at which growth inhibition was still detectable following the agar WDA. To
determine the effects of enzymatic treatments, samples (180 µl of twice the minimum inhibitory
concentration corresponding to the supernatant from the cell-free culture) were incubated with 20 µl
portion of following enzyme solutions, P3911 (16.6 UI/ml), type XIV (7.9 UI/ml), type XVIII
(0.66 UI/ml), proteinase K (59.2 UI/ml), chymotrypsin (700 UI/ml) at 37°C for 1 h 30 min. (Jack et al.,
1996) and the residual activity was measured following the WDA. Positive controls were incubated with
20 µl of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). To determine the effect of temperature and pH on the
stability of the inhibitor sample corresponding to a dilution of ¼ of neutralized cell-free supernatant
(pH 6.5) in 50 mM phosphate buffer at pH 5, 7 and 9, and aliquots of each were subsequently heated to
60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110 and 121°C for 10 min. (Ryan et al., 1996). The remaining activity was assayed
and compared to activity at each pH prior to heat treatment.
Selected isolates were examined microscopically for cellular morphology and Gram stain phenotype.
Catalase activity was tested by spotting colonies with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Fermentation of different
sugars was determined by API 50 CHL (Biomerieux). PCR was used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene of
bacteriocin-producing strains. The 16S rDNA sequence was determined by direct sequencing. Total
DNA was isolated by using Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, USA). Primers
used for PCR and DNA sequencing are presented in table 2. The PCR amplification was performed with
the primer pair SPO/SP6 targeted against regions of 16S rDNA (Ventura et al., 2001). Amplification of
DNA was performed in a Mastercycler personal thermal cycler (Eppendorf). PCR conditions included a
hot start at 96°C (5 min.), 25 cycles consisting of hybridation at 50°C (1 min), polymerisation at 72°C
(2 min.), denaturation at 96°C (1 min) and a final extension at 72°C (10 min.). PCR products were
resolved by electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide (1 µl/10 ml)
staining. 16S rDNA PCR amplicons were purified following the microcon YM-100 kit (Bedford, MA,
USA) and sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator V3.0 kit as specified by the supplier with primers
described in table 2 while automated sequencing of both strands of the PCR products was done on an
ABI 3100 automated gene sequencer (ABI, Forster, USA). The sequences obtained (350–500 bp) were
then assembled in silico (Vector NTI) using overlapping zones between the various sequences to form
the contiguous sequence. Phylogenetic analysis was realised by an alignment of sequence consensus of
the 16S rDNA genes collected in an international database (Genebank). The results were then expressed
in percentage of homology between the submitted sequence and the sequences resulting from the
database.
A total of about 70000 colonies isolated from food samples were examined for detection of antibacterial
activity against a set of 6 indicators. A total of 340 (0.6% detection rate) colonies producing a growth
inhibition area in the indicator lawn were recorded. Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated the highest
detection rate among indicator bacteria. Two hundred and twenty colonies which displayed antibacterial
activity against the indicator lawn were randomly isolated and purified; 20 of these strains produced
antibacterial activity in the neutralized cell-free supernatant, whereas only 12 confirmed the activity
when the CFS was treated with catalase (65 UI/ml). The activity was either completely or partially
inactivated by proteolytic enzymes (Figure 1) but was resistant to heat (Figure 2). These results
demonstrated that antimicrobial compounds produced by our 12 isolates were heat stable protein or
peptide indicating bacteriocin-like substances. Four food samples (12.5% incidence rate) yielded
bacteriocin-producing strains. The distribution of bacteriocin producers in food samples is presented in
table 2. Our observations could be correlated with similar studies reported these last years. Garver et al.
(1993) have reported 13% of products yielding bacteriocin-producers by direct plating and 21% by
enrichment while Conventry et al. (1997) obtained 43% by direct plating and 46% by enrichment.
Lasagno et al. (2002) identified two bacteriocin-producers among 206 isolates selected on the basis of
the inhibition of Lactobacillus plantarum by the CFS using the WDA. Four of the twelve bacteriocin-
producing isolates obtained (designated CWBI-B1410, CWBI-B1411, CWBI-B1427 and CWBI-B1428)
were selected for further study on the basis of their food source, indicator used for detection, activity
against seven indicators and stability of activity upon repeated subcultures.
3.2. Inhibitory spectra
The sensivity of 33 bacterial strains from different genera to the bacteriocin-like substances produced by
the four selected isolates are presented in table 3. Neutralised cell-free supernatant from CWBI-B1410,
CWBI-B1427 and CWBI-B1428 isolates demonstrated similar spectra of activity broader than the one
produced by the CWBI-1411 isolate. This one showed a reasonably diverse spectrum. All bacteriocins
produced by the four isolates showed antimicrobial activity against Bacillus coagulans involved in food
spoilage, and the food-poisoning bacterium Listeria monocytogenes, whereas only bacteriocins
produced by CWBI-B1410, CWBI-B1427 and CWBI-B1428 isolates inhibited Bacillus cereus.
3.3. Bacteriocin activity
Activity units per ml (AU/ml) of bacteriocins was determined following WDA assay and presented in
table 4. Bacillus coagulans showed the more sensivity to bacteriocins. The level of activity against this
strain, (104 to 105 AU/ml), can be correlated with similar studies reported these last years. Flynn et al.
(2002) have reported 106 AU/ml, using a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus salivarius subsp.
salivarius, whereas Garcia et al. (2003) reported 105 AU/ml with enterocin EJ97 produced by
Enterococcus feacalis EJ97. Bacteriocins produced by CWBI-B1410, CWBI-B1427 and CWBI-B1428
isolates also demonstrated an activity of 103 AU/ml against Pediococcus pentosaseus whereas that
produced by CWBI-B1411 is more active against Listeria monocytogenes (data not shown). CWBI-
B1410 showed the highest production of bacteriocin.
Bacteriocin-producing isolates were catalase negative, and Gram positif cocci (CWBI-B1410, CWBI-
B1427 and CWBI-B1428) or ovoid (CWBI-B1411). Fermentation of different carbohydrates was
performed using the API 50 CHL system (API Biomerieux). 22 reactions (sugar fermentation) were
determined and 6 of them provided a mean of discriminating them (Table 5). Identification made by the
API database correlation indicated that all the four strains were Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis.
However, a low percentage of similarity (91%) was obtained for CWBI-B1411 (Table 6).
Nucleotide sequences of 16S rDNA of the four bacteriocin-producing isolates were carried out to
confirm or infirm biochemical species identification. The determined 16S rDNA sequences of isolates
were compared directly with the Genebank database. A high level of similarity of 16S ribosomal DNA
nucleotide sequences (99% of matches) of CWBI-B1410, CWBI-B1427 and CWBI-B1428 strains was
observed with the sequences of Lactococcus lactis subps. lactis strains whereas the sequence of CWBI-
B1411 strain matched best with that of Enterococcus faecium strains (Table 6). The closest matches for
CWBI-B1411 strain and Enterococcus faecium were different from the identification determined by API
method (Table 6). However, we prioritized genetic identification because of it accordance with
morphology analysis, and the low percentage of similarity obtained by biochemical analysis which could
be due to the inadequacy of API CHL 50 for well identification of Enterococcus strains. Partial 16S
rDNA of the two bacteriocin-producing isolates Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (CWBI-B1410) and
Enterococcus faecium (CWBI-B1411) have been registered to Genebank databases respectively under
the accession numbers AY971748 and AY971749. Due to the high amount of bacteriocin produced in the
culture supernatant, the Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strain (named CWBI-B1410) was selected for
further investigations.
4. Conclusion
Traditional fermented foods from Senegal provide an appropriate ecological habitat for wild bacteriocin-
producing LAB. Bacteriocin producers mainly belong to Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis group.
Bacteriocin-producing Lactococcus lactis strains were found in a variety of fermented products
indicating a high potential of growth of this strain in different ecological complex environment. The
produced bacteriocins showed a broad spectrum of activity including spoilage microorganisms and
pathogens associated with food such as Bacillus coagulans, Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus
cereus. These results show the potential usefulness of these bacteriocins justifying a more in depth
investigation for their identification and application as food biopreservatives.
Researchers indicate that strains of LAB have potential to act as a biopreservative or natural food preservative. The
bacteriocins are able to inhibit spoilage and pathogenic bacteria, such as S. aureus, E. coli, B. cereus, B. subtilis, L.
monocytogenes and C. perfringens. These bacteria are not responsive to traditional food preservation methods.
The use of bacteriocins or the microorganisms that produce them is attractive to the food industry in the face of
increasing consumer demand for natural products and the concerns over foodborne diseases. It has also led to the need
to exploit the biologically derived antimicrobial substances produced by LAB.
It is not clear if any bacteriocin is produced in vegetables fermented by LAB in natural or inoculated fermentation. The
bacteriocin produced by strains isolated from naturally fermented vegetables has neither been characterized nor
checked for efficacy in various food products. So, Indian scientists decided to characterize the antimicrobial activity of
partially purified bacteriocin produced during the natural lactic acid fermentation of carrot, radish and cucumber.
Out of 10 strains, the isolated strain CA 44 of the Lactobacillus genus from carrot fermentation produced a bacteriocin
that had strong antimicrobial activity against E. coli, S. aureus and B. cereus, although it was more effective against E.
coli than other bacteria. The bacteriocin was stable up to 100 C, but its activity had declined compared to bacteriocin at
68 C. Its stability was completely lost at 121 C.
The maximum antimicrobial activity was retained within a pH range of 4 to 5. But this activity was adversely affected
by the addition of papain, a cysteine protease present in papaya, and which is useful in tenderizing meat and other
proteins. Bacteriocins were also effective against B. cereus in different fruit products--pulp, juice and wine--indicating
their potential application as biopreservatives in these types of products.