How To Design Concrete Structures Using Eurocode 2 PDF

The Eurocode family
This chapter shows how to use Eurocode 2

1
with the other Eurocodes. In
particular it introduces Eurocode: Basis of structural design
2
and Eurocode 1:
Actions on structures
3
and guides the designer through the process of
determining the design values for actions on a structure. It also gives a brief
overview of the significant differences between the Eurocodes and BS 8110
4
,
(which will be superseded) and includes a glossary of Eurocode terminology.
The development of the Eurocodes started in 1975; since then they have
evolved significantly and are now claimed to be the most technically
advanced structural codes in the world. The many benefits of using Eurocode 2
are summarised below. There are ten Eurocodes covering all the main structural
materials (see Figure 1). They are produced by the European Committee for
Standardization (CEN), and will replace existing national standards in 28
countries.
Each country is required to publish a Eurocode with a national title page and
forward but the original text of the Eurocode must appear as produced by
CEN as the main body of the document. A National Annex (NA) can be
included at the back of the document (see Figure 2). Throughout this
publication it is assumed that the UK National Annexes will be used.
Table 1 details which existing standards relating to concrete design will be
replaced by the new Eurocodes. During the implementation period it is
recommended that existing standards are considered for use where the
European standards have not yet been issued.
How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2
1. Introduction to Eurocodes
R S Narayanan FREng O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
Benefits of using Eurocode 2
Learning to use the new Eurocodes will require time and effort on
behalf of the designer, so what benefits will there be?
1. The new Eurocodes are claimed to be the most technically
advanced codes in the world.
2. Eurocode 2 should result in more economic structures than
BS 8110.
3. The Eurocodes are logical and organised to avoid repetition.
4. Eurocode 2 is less restrictive than existing codes.
5. Eurocode 2 is more extensive than existing codes.
6. Use of the Eurocodes will provide more opportunity for designers
to work throughout Europe.
7. In Europe all public works must allow the Eurocodes to be used.
01_Introduction (amended).qxd 19/12/06 08:59 Page 1
A J Bond F:FL\=B<Ia=FB<> <>g`
O Brooker ;>g`<>g`FB<> FBLmkn\m>
A J Harris ;L\FL\=B<FB<> <>g`?@L
T Harrison ;L\Ia=<>g`FB<> ?B<M
R M Moss ;L\Ia==B<<>g`FB<> FBLmkn\m>
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
RWebster <>g`?BLmkn\m>
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
Lmkn\mnk^lnlbg`>nkh\h]^+
:cementZg] concrete bg]nlmkrin[eb\Zmbhg This chapter is taken
from The Concrete
Centres publication,
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
F
E
2
Figure 2
Typical Eurocode layout
Table 1
Concrete related Eurocodes and their equivalent current standards
Figure 1
The Eurocodes
Eurocode Title Superseded standards
BS EN 1990 Basis of structural design BS 8110: Part 1 section 2
BS EN 199111 Densities, self-weight and BS 6399: Part 1 and BS 648
imposed loads
BS EN 199112 Actions on structures
exposed to fire
BS EN 199113 Snow loads BS 6399: Part 2
BS EN 199114 Wind actions BS 6399: Part 3
BS EN 199115 Thermal actions
BS EN 199116 Actions during execution
BS EN 199117 Accidental actions
BS EN 19912 Traffic loads on bridges BD 37/88
BS EN 19913 Actions induced by cranes
and machinery
BS EN 19914 Silos and tanks
BS EN 199211 General rules for buildings BS 8110: Parts 1, 2 and 3
BS EN 199212 Fire resistance of concrete BS 8110: Part 1, Table 3.2 and
structures BS 8110: Part 2, section 4
BS EN 19922 Bridges BS 5400: Part 4
BS EN 19923 Liquid-retaining and BS 8007
containment structures
BS EN 19971 Geotechnical design BS 6031, BS 8002, BS 8004,
General rules BS 8006, BS 8008 &BS 8081
BS EN 19972 Geotechnical design Ground BS 5930
investigation and testing
BS EN 1998 Design of structures for
earthquake resistance (6 parts)
Structural safety,
serviceability and durability
Design and detailing
Geotechnical
and seismic
design
A: National title page
B: National Foreword
C: CEN title page
D: Main text
E: Main Annex(es)
F: National Annex
BS EN 1990, Eurocode:
Basis of structural design
BS EN 1991, Eurocode 1:
BS EN 1992, Eurocode 2: Concrete
BS EN 1993, Eurocode 3: Steel
BS EN 1994, Eurocode 4: Composite
BS EN 1995, Eurocode 5: Timber
BS EN 1996, Eurocode 6: Masonry
BS EN 1999, Eurocode 9: Aluminium
Geotechnical design
Seismic design
D
D
D
D
C
B
A
Eurocode: Basis of
structural design
This Eurocode underpins all structural design irrespective of the
material of construction. It establishes principles and requirements for
safety, serviceability and durability of structures. (Note, the correct title
is Eurocode not Eurocode 0.) The Eurocode uses a statistical approach
to determine realistic values for actions that occur in combination with
each other.
There is no equivalent British Standard for Eurocode: Basis of structural
design and the corresponding information has traditionally been
replicated in each of the material Eurocodes. It also introduces new
definitions (see Glossary) and symbols (see Tables 2a and 2b), which
will be used throughout this publication to assist familiarity. Partial
factors for actions are given in this Eurocode, whilst partial factors for
materials are prescribed in their relevant Eurocode.
Representative values
For each variable action there are four representative values. The
principal representative value is the characteristic value and this can be
determined statistically or, where there is insufficient data, a nominal
value may be used. The other representative values are combination,
frequent and quasi-permanent; these are obtained by applying to the
characteristic value the factors c
0
, c
1
and c
2
respectively (see Figure 3).
A semi-probabilistic method is used to derive the c factors, which vary
depending on the type of imposed load (see Table 3). Further information
on derivation of the c factors can be found in Appendix C of the Eurocode.
The combination value (c
0
Q
k
) of an action is intended to take
account of the reduced probability of the simultaneous occurrence of
two or more variable actions. The frequent value ( c
1
Q
k
) is such that it
should be exceeded only for a short period of time and is used
primarily for the serviceability limit states (SLS) and also the accidental
ultimate limit state (ULS). The quasi-permanent value ( c
2
Q
k
) may be
exceeded for a considerable period of time; alternatively it may be
considered as an average loading over time. It is used for the long-term
affects at the SLS and also accidental and seismic ULS.
Combinations of actions
In the Eurocodes the term combination of actions is specifically used
for the definition of the magnitude of actions to be used when a limit
state is under the influence of different actions. It should not be
confused with load cases, which are concerned with the arrangement
of the variable actions to give the most unfavourable conditions and
are given in the material Eurocodes. The following process can be used
to determine the value of actions used for analysis:
1. Identify the design situation (e.g. persistent, transient, accidental).
2. Identify all realistic actions.
3. Determine the partial factors (see below) for each applicable
combination of actions.
4. Arrange the actions to produce the most critical conditions.

3
Action
c
0
c
1
c
2
Imposed loads in buildings (see BS EN 199111)
Category A: domestic, residential areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category B: office areas 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category C: congregation areas 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category D: shopping areas 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category E: storage areas 1.0 0.9 0.8
Category F: traffic area, vehicle weight < 30 kN 0.7 0.7 0.6
Category G: traffic area, 30 kN < vehicle weight < 160 kN 0.7 0.5 0.3
Category H: roofs* 0.7 0 0
Snow loads on buildings (see BS EN 19913)
For sites located at altitude H > 1000 m above sea level 0.7 0.5 0.2
For sites located at altitude H < 1000 m above sea level 0.5 0.2 0
Wind loads on buildings (see BS EN 199114) 0.5 0.2 0
Temperature (non-fire) in buildings (see BS EN 199115) 0.6 0.5 0
Key
*See also 199111: Clause 3.3.2
3
Figure 3
Representative values of variable actions
Table 2b
Selected subscripts
Table 3
Recommended values of
c
factors for buildings (from UK National Annex)
Table 2a
Selected symbols for Eurocode
Symbol Definition
G
k
Characteristic value of permanent action
Q
k
Characteristic value of single variable action
g
G Partial factor for permanent action
g
Q Partial factor for variable action
c
0 Factor for combination value of a variable action
c
1 Factor for frequent value of a variable action
c
2 Factor for quasi-permanent value of a variable action
j
Combination factor for permanent actions
Subscript Definition
A Accidental situation
c Concrete
d Design
E Effect of action
fi Fire
k Characteristic
R Resistance
w Shear reinforcement
y Yield strength
Characteristic value of QK
I
n
s
t
a
n
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
v
a
l
u
e
o
f
Q
Time
Combination value of c0QK
Frequent value of c1QK
Quasi-
permanent
value of c2QK
Where there is only one variable action (e.g. imposed load) in a
combination, the magnitude of the actions can be obtained by
multiplying them by the appropriate partial factors.
Where there is more than one variable action in a combination, it is
necessary to identify the leading action (Q
k,1
) and other accompanying
actions (Q
k,i
). The accompanying action is always taken as the
combination value.
Ultimate limit state
The ultimate limit states are divided into the following categories:
EQU Loss of equilibrium of the structure.
STR Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure
or structural member.
GEO Failure due to excessive deformation of the ground.
FAT Fatigue failure of the structure or structural members.
The Eurocode gives different combinations for each of these ultimate
limit states. For the purpose of this publication only the STR ultimate
limit state will be considered.
For persistent and transient design situations under the STR limit
state, the Eurocode defines three possible combinations, which are given
in Expressions (6.10), (6.10a) and (6.10b) of the Eurocode (see Tables 4
and 5). The designer (for UK buildings) may use either (6.10) or the less
favourable of (6.10a) and (6.10b).
At first sight it appears that there is considerably more calculation
required to determine the appropriate load combination; however, with
experience the designer will be able to determine this by inspection.
Expression (6.10) is always equal to or more conservative than the less
favourable of Expressions (6.10a) and (6.10b). Expression (6.10b) will
normally apply when the permanent actions are not greater than 4.5
times the variable actions (except for storage loads (category E, Table 3)
where Expression (6.10a) always applies).
Therefore, for a typical concrete frame building, Expression (6.10b) will
give the most structurally economical combination of actions.
Serviceability limit state
There are three combinations of actions that can be used to check the
serviceability limit states (see Tables 6 and 7). Eurocode 2 indicates
which combination should be used for which phenomenon (e.g.
deflection is checked using the quasi-permanent combination). Care
should be taken not to confuse the SLS combinations of characteristic,
frequent and quasi-permanent, with the representative values that
have the same titles.
For members supporting one variable action the combination
1.25 G
k
+ 1.5 Q
k
(derived from (Exp 6.10b))
can be used provided the permanent actions are not greater
than 4.5 times the variable actions (except for storage loads).
4
Table 4
Design values of actions, ultimate limit state persistent and transient design situations (table A1.2 (B) Eurocode)
Table 5
Design values of actions, derived for UK design, ultimate limit state persistent and transient design situations
Table 6
Design values of actions, serviceability limit states
Table 7
Example design combinations for deflection (quasi-permanent) derived for typical UK reinforced concrete design
Combination Expression reference Permanent actions Leading variable action Accompanying variable actions
Unfavourable Favourable Main (if any) Others
Exp. (6.10) g
G, j , sup
G
k , j , sup
g
G, j , inf
G
k , j , inf
g
Q,1
Q
k,1
g
Q,1
c
0,1
Q
k, i
Exp. (6.10a) g
G, j , sup
G
k , j , sup
g
G, j , inf
G
k , j , inf
g
Q,1
c
0,1
Q
k,1
g
Q,1
c
0,1
Q
k,i
Exp. (6.10b) jg
G, j , sup
G
k , j , sup
g
G, j , inf
G
k , j , inf
g
Q,1
Q
k,1
g
Q,1
c
0,1
Q
k, i
Note
1 Design for either Expression (6.10) or the less favourable of Expressions (6.10a) and (6.10b).
Combination Expression reference Permanent actions Leading variable action Accompanying variable actions
Combination of permanent and variable actions
Exp. (6.10) 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5
c
Q
k
Exp. (6.10a) 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5 c
0,1
b
Q
k
Exp. (6.10b) 0.925
d
x 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5
c
Q
k
Combination of permanent, variable and accompanying variable actions
Exp. (6.10) 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5
c
Q
k,1
1.5
c
c
0, i
b
Q
k, i
Exp. (6.10a) 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5 c
0,1
b
Q
k
1.5
c
c
0,i
b
Q
k,i
Exp. (6.10b) 0.925
d
x 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5
c
Q
k,1
1.5
c
c
0,i
b
Q
k,i
Key
a Where the variation in permanent action is not considered significant, G
k,j,sup
and G
k,j,inf
may be taken as G
k
b The value of
c
0
can be obtained from Table NA A1.1 of the UK National Annex (reproduced here as Table 3)
c Where the accompanying load is favourable, g
Q,i
= 0
d The value of j in the UK National Annex is 0.925
Combination Permanent actions Variable actions Example of use in Eurocode 2
Unfavourable Favourable Leading Others
Characteristic G
k,j,sup
G
k,j,inf
Q
k,1
c
0, i
Q
k,i
Frequent G
k,j,sup
G
k,j,inf
c
1,1
Q
k,1
c
2, i
Q
k,i
Cracking prestressed concrete
Quasi-permanent G
k,j,sup
G
k,j,inf
c
2,1
Q
k,1
c
2, i
Q
k,i
Deflection
Notes
1 Where the variation in permanent action is not considered significant. G
k,j,sup
and G
k,j,inf
may be taken as G
k
2 For values of
c
0,
c
1
and
c
2
refer to Table 3
Combination Permanent actions Variable action
Unfavourable Leading
Office G
k
a
0.3
b
Q
k,1
Shopping area G
k
a
0.6
b
Q
k,1
Storage G
k
a
0.8
b
Q
k,1
Key
a Where the variation in permanent action is not considered significant G
k,j,sup
and G
k,j,inf
may be taken as G
k
b Values of
c
2
are taken from UK NA (see Table 3)

5
5
Table 8
Eurocode 1, its parts and dates of publication
Figure 4
Relationship between Eurocode 2 and other Eurocodes
Key
a Planned publication date (correct at time of publication) Source: BSI
8
BS EN 1997
EUROCODE 7
Geotechnical
design
BS EN 206
Specifying
concrete
BS 8500
Specifying
concrete
BS EN 13670
Execution of
structures
BS EN 1990
EUROCODE
Basis of structural
design
BS EN 1991
EUROCODE 1
Actions on
structures
BS EN 1992
EUROCODE 2
Design of concrete
structures
Part 11: General
rules for structures
Part 12: Structural
fire design
BS EN 1992 Part 3:
EUROCODE 2
Liquid-retaining
structures
BS EN 1992
EUROCODE 2
Part 2:
Bridges
BS EN 1998
EUROCODE 8
Seismic
design
BS EN 10080
Reinforcing
steels
BS 4449
Reinforcing
steels
BS EN 13369
Precast
concrete
Precast
concrete
product
standards
Reference Title Publication date
Eurocode National Annex
BS EN 199111 Densities, July December
self-weight and 2002 2005
imposed loads
BS EN 199112 Actions on November Due
structures 2002 October
exposed to fire 2006
a
BS EN 199113 Snow loads July December
2003 2005
BS EN 199114 Wind actions April Due
2005 January
2007
a
BS EN 199115 Thermal actions March Due
2004 December
2006
a
BS EN 199116 Actions during December Due
execution 2005 June
2007
a
BS EN 199117 Accidental actions September Due
due to impact 2006 October
and explosions 2007
a
BS EN 19912 Traffic loads October Due
on bridges 2003 December
2006
a
BS EN 19913 Actions induced September Due
by cranes 2006 January
and machinery 2007
a
BS EN 19914 Actions in silos June Due
and tanks 2006 June
2007
a
Eurocode 1
Eurocode 1 supersedes BS 6399: Loading for buildings
6
and BS 648:
Schedule of weights of building materials
7
. It contains within its ten parts
(see Table 8) all the information required by the designer to assess the
individual actions on a structure. It is generally self-explanatory and it
is anticipated the actions to be used in the UK (as advised in the UK
National Annex) will typically be the same as those in the current
British Standards. The most notable exception is the bulk density of
reinforced concrete, which has been increased to 25 kN/m
3
. Currently
not all the parts of Eurocode 1 and their National Annexes are
available, in which case it is advised that the loads recommended in
the current British Standards are used.
Eurocode 2
There are four parts to Eurocode 2; Figure 4 indicates how they fit into
the Eurocode system, which includes other European standards.
Part 11
Eurocode 2, Part 11: General rules and rules for buildings
9
is the
principal part which is referenced by the three other parts. For the UK
designer there are a number of differences between Eurocode 2 and
BS 8110, which will initially make the new Eurocode seem unfamiliar.
The key differences are listed below to assist in the familiarisation process.
1. Eurocode 2 is generally laid out to give advice on the basis of
phenomena (e.g. bending, shear etc) rather than by member
types as in BS 8110 (e.g. beams, slabs, columns etc).
2. Design is based on characteristic cylinder strengths not cube
strengths.
3. The Eurocode does not provide derived formulae (e.g. for bending,
only the details of the stress block are expressed). This is the
traditional European approach, where the application of a Eurocode
is expected to be provided in a textbook or similar publication.
The Eurocodes allow for this type of detail to be provided in
Non-contradictory complementary information (NCCI) (See
Glossary).
4. Units for stress are mega pascals, MPa (1 MPa = 1 N/mm
2
).
5. Eurocode 2 uses a comma for a decimal point. It is expected that
UK designers will continue to use a decimal point. Therefore to
avoid confusion, the comma should not be used for separating
multiples of a thousand.
6. One thousandth is represented by .
7. The partial factor for steel reinforcement is 1.15. However, the
characteristic yield strength of steel that meets the requirements
of BS 4449 will be 500 MPa; so overall the effect is negligible.
8. Eurocode 2 is applicable for ribbed reinforcement with characteristic
yield strengths of 400 to 600 MPa. There is no guidance on plain
bar or mild steel reinforcement in the Eurocode, but guidance is
given in the background paper to the UK National Annex
10
.
9. The effects of geometric imperfection (notional horizontal loads)
are considered in addition to lateral loads.
6 6
10. Minimum concrete cover is related to bond strength, durability
and fire resistance. In addition to the minimum cover an
allowance for deviations due to variations in execution
(construction) should be included. Eurocode 2 recommends
that, for concrete cast against formwork, this is taken as 10 mm,
unless the construction is subject to a quality assurance system
in which case it could be reduced to 5 mm or even 0 mm where
non-conforming members are rejected (e.g. in a precast yard).
It is recommended that the nominal cover is stated on the
drawings and construction tolerances are given in the
specification.
11. Higher strengths of concrete are covered by Eurocode 2, up to
class C90/105. However, because the characteristics of higher
strength concrete are different, some Expressions in the Eurocode
are adjusted for classes above C50/60.
12. The variable strut inclination method is used in Eurocode 2 for
the assessment of the shear capacity of a section. In practice,
design values for actual structures can be compared with
tabulated values. Further advice can be found in Chapter 4,
originally published as Beams
11
.
13. The punching shear checks are carried out at 2d from the face of
the column and for a rectangular column, the perimeter is
rounded at the corners.
14. Serviceability checks can still be carried out using deemed to
satisfy span to effective depth rules similar to BS 8110. However,
if a more detailed check is required, Eurocode 2 guidance varies
from the rules in BS 8110 Part 2.
15. The rules for determining the anchorage and lap lengths are more
complex than the simple tables in BS 8110. Eurocode 2 considers
the effects of, amongst other things, the position of bars during
concreting, the shape of the bar and cover.
Part 12
Eurocode 2, Part 12: Structural fire design
12
, gives guidance on design for
fire resistance of concrete structures. Although much of the Eurocode
is devoted to fire engineering methods, the design for fire resistance
may still be carried out by referring to tables for minimum cover and
dimensions for various elements. These are given in section 5 of Part
12. Further advice on using the tabular method is given in Chapter 2,
originally published as Getting started
13
.
Part 2
Eurocode 2, Part 2: Bridges
14
applies the general rules given in Part 11
to the design of concrete bridges. As a consequence both Part 11 and
Part 2 will be required to carry out a design of a reinforced concrete
bridge.
Part 3
Eurocode 2, Part 3: Liquid-retaining and containment structures
15
applies
the general rules given in Part 11 to the liquid-retaining structures
and supersedes BS 8007
16
.
Eurocode 7
Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design
17
is in two parts and gives guidance on
geotechnical design, ground investigation and testing. It has a broad
scope and includes the geotechnical design of spread foundations, piled
foundations, retaining walls, deep basements and embankments. Like
all the Eurocodes it is based on limit state design principles, which is
a significant variation for most geotechnical design. Further guidance
related to simple foundations is given in Chapter 6, originally
ppublished as Foundations
18
.
Eurocode 8
Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance
19
is divided into
six parts and gives guidance on all aspects of design for earthquake
resistance and covers guidance for the various structural materials for
all types of structures. It also includes guidance for strengthening and
repair of buildings. In areas of low seismicity it is anticipated that detailing
structures to Eurocode 2 will ensure compliance with Eurocode 8.
Related Standards
BS 8500/BS EN 206
BS 8500: Concrete Complementary British Standard to BS EN 2061
20
replaced BS 5328 in December 2003 and designers should currently
be using this to specify concrete. Further guidance can found in
Chapter 11, originally published as How to use BS 8500 with BS 8110
21
.
BS 4449/BS EN 10080
BS 4449: Specification for carbon steel bars for the reinforcement of
concrete
22
has been revised ready for implementation in January 2006.
It is a complementary standard to BS EN 10080 Steel for the
reinforcement of concrete
23
and Normative Annex C of Eurocode 2. The
most significant changes are that steel characteristic yield will change
to 500 MPa. There are three classes of reinforcement, A, B and C, which
indicate increasing ductility. Class A is not suitable for use where
redistribution of 20% and above has been assumed in the design.
BS EN 13670
BS 8110 Part 1 sections 6 and 7 specify the workmanship for concrete
construction. There is no equivalent guidance in Eurocode 2, and it is
intended that execution (construction) will be covered in a new
standard BS EN 13670 Execution of concrete structures
24
. This is still in
preparation and is not expected to be ready for publication until 2008
at the earliest. In the intervening period the draft background paper to
the UK National Annex of Eurocode 2, Part 1
-
1
10
recommends that
designers use the National structural concrete specification for building
construction
25
, which refers to BS 8110 for workmanship.
6
7
Glossary of Eurocode terminology
Term Definition
Principles Clauses that are general statements, definitions, requirements and analytical models for which no
alternative is permitted. They are identified by (P) after the clause number.
Application Rules These are generally recognised rules, which comply with the principles and satisfy their requirements.
Nationally Determined Parameter (NDP) Eurocodes may be used to satisfy national Building Regulations, which themselves will not be
harmonized. NDPs are therefore used to allow a country to set its own levels of safety. NDPs also allow
certain other parameters (generally influenced by climate, geography and geology) to be left open for
selection nationally: NDPs are advised in the National Annex.
National Annex (NA) A National Annex accompanies each Eurocode and it contains a) the values of NDPs b) the national
decision regarding the use of Informative Annexes and c) references to NCCIs
Normative The term used for the text of Standards that forms the core requirements. Compliance with Eurocodes
will generally be judged against the normative requirements.
Informative A term used only in relation to annexes, which seek to inform rather than require.
NCCI Non-contradictory complementary information. References in a National Annex which contains further
information or guidance which does not contradict the Eurocode.
Characteristic value A value that may be derived statistically with a probability of not being exceeded during a reference
period. The value corresponds to a specified fractile for a particular property of material or product. The
characteristic values are denoted by subscript k (e.g. Q
k
etc). It is the principal representative value
from which other representative values may be derived.
Representative value Value used for verification of a limit state. It may be the characteristic value or an accompanying value,
e.g. combination, frequent or quasi-permanent.
Design values These refer to representative values modified by partial factors. They are denoted by subscript d
(e.g. f
cd
= f
ck
/g
c ;
Q
d
= g
Q
Q
k
).
Action (F) Set of forces, deformations or accelerations acting on the structure.
Combination of actions Set of design values used for the verification of the structural reliability for a limit state under the
simultaneous influence of different and statistically independent actions.
Fixed action Action that has a fixed distribution and position over the structure or structural member.
Free action Action that may have various spatial distributions over the structure.
Permanent actions (G) Actions that are likely to act throughout the life of the structure and whose variation in magnitude
with time is negligible (e.g. permanent loads).
Variable actions (Q) Actions whose magnitude will vary with time (e.g. wind loads).
Effect of action (E) Deformation or internal force caused by an action.
Accidental action (A) Action, usually of short duration but of significant magnitude, that is unlikely to occur on a given
structure during the design working life.
Accompanying action An action in a combination that is not the leading variable action.
Transient design situation Design situation that is relevant during a period much shorter than the design working life of the structure.
Persistent design situation Design situation that is relevant during a period of the same order as the design working life of the structure.
Accidental design situation Design situation involving exceptional conditions of the structure.
Irreversible serviceability limit state Serviceability limit state where some consequences of actions will remain when the actions are removed.
Reversible serviceability limit state Serviceability limit state where no consequences of actions will remain when the actions are removed.
Execution Construction of the works.
References
1 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1992, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. BSI (4 parts).
2 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1990, Eurocode: Basis of structural design. BSI, 2002.
3 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1991, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. BSI (10 parts).
4 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8110: The structural use of concrete. BSI (3 parts).
5 GULVANESSIAN, H, CALGARO, J A & HOLIC
Y, M T. Designers guide to EN 1990. Thomas Telford, 2002.

6 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 6399: Loading for buildings. BSI (3 parts).
7 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 648: Schedule of weights of building materials. BSI, 1964.
8 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. Web page: www.bsi-global.com/Eurocodes/Progress/index.xalter. BSI.
9 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199211, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules and rules for buildings. BSI, 2004.
10 BRITISH STANDARD INSTITUTION. PD 6687. Background paper to the UK National Annex to BS EN 199211. BSI, 2006.
11 MOSS, R M &BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Beams (TCC/03/19). The Concrete Centre, 2006.
12 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199212, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Structural fire design. BSI, 2004.
13 BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Getting started (TCC/03/17). The Concrete Centre, 2005.
14 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 19922, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Bridges. BSI, 2005.
15 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 19923, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Liquid-retaining and containment structures.
BSI, due 2006.
16 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8007: Code of practice for design of concrete structures for retaining aqueous liquids. BSI, 1987.
17 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1997, Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design. BSI (2 parts).
18 WEBSTER, R &BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Foundations (TCC/03/21). The Concrete Centre, 2006.
19 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1998, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. BSI (6 parts).
20 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8500: Concrete Complementary British Standard to BS EN 2061, 2002 (2 parts).
21 HARRISON, T A &BROOKER, O. How to use BS 8500 with BS 8110 (TCC/03/11). The Concrete Centre, 2005.
22 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 4449: Specification for carbon steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete. BSI, 2005.
23 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 10080: Steel for the reinforcement of concrete Weldable reinforcing steel General. BSI, 2005.
24 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. EN 13670: Execution of concrete structures Part 1: Common. BSI, due 2008.
25 THE CONCRETE SOCIETY. CS 152: National structural concrete specification for building construction, third edition. The Society, 2004.
All advice or information from The Concrete Centre is intended for those who will evaluate the significance and limitations of its contents
and take responsibility for its use and application. No liability (including that for negligence) for any loss resulting from such advice or
information is accepted by The Concrete Centre or its subcontractors, suppliers or advisors. Readers should note that publications from
The Concrete Centre are subject to revision from time to time and they should therefore ensure that they are in possession of the
latest version. This publication has been produced following a contract placed by the Department for Trade and Industry (DTI); the
views expressed are not necessarily those of the DTI.
Ref: TCC/03/16
ISBN 1-904818-26-9
First published November 2005, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre
and British Cement Association

Published by The Concrete Centre
Riverside House, 4 Meadows Business Park,
Station Approach, Blackwater, Camberley,
Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
www.concretecentre.com
For more information on Eurocode 2 and
other questions relating to the design, use
and performance of concrete contact the
free National Helpline on:
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
helpline@concretecentre.com
Acknowledgements
The content of this publication was produced as part of the project Eurocode 2: transition from UK to European concrete design standards. This
project was part funded by the DTI under the Partners in Innovation scheme. The lead partner was the British Cement Association. The work was
carried out under the guidance of the Concrete Industry Eurocode 2 Group, which consists of representatives from:
Alan Baxter and Associates Arup British Cement Association British Precast Building Research Establishment Clark Smith Partnership
Concrete Innovation and Design Construct Department for Trade and Industry Office of the Deputy Prime Minister The Concrete Centre
The Concrete Society Quarry Products Association.
The design process
This chapter is intended to assist the designer determine all the design
information required prior to embarking on detailed element design. It
covers design life, actions on structures, load arrangements, combinations
of actions, method of analysis, material properties, stability and
imperfections, minimum concrete cover and maximum crack widths.
The process of designing elements will not be revolutionised as a result
of using Eurocode 2
1
, although much of the detail may change as
described in subsequent chapters.
Similarly, the process of detailing will not vary significantly from current
practice. Guidance can be found in Chapter 10 or in Standard method of
detailing
2
. With regard to specification, advice can be found in Chapter 1,
originally published as Introduction to Eurocodes
3
. Concept designs
prepared assuming that detailed design would be to BS 8110 may be
continued through to detailed design using Eurocode 2.
In the long-term it is anticipated that Eurocode 2 will lead to more
economic structures.
Design life
The design life for a structure is given in Eurocode: Basis of structural
design
4
. The UK National Annex (NA) to Eurocode presents UK values
for design life; these are given in Table 1 (overleaf). These should be used
to determine the durability requirements for the design of reinforced
concrete structures.
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures
5
consists of 10 parts giving details of
a wide variety of actions. Further information on the individual codes
can be found in Chapter 1. Eurocode 1, Part 11: General actions
Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings
6
gives the densities and
self-weights of building materials (see Table 2 overleaf).
The key change to current practice is that the bulk density of reinforced
concrete has been increased to 25 kN/m
3
. The draft National Annex to
this Eurocode gives the imposed loads for UK buildings and a selection is
2. Getting started
O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
02_Getting Started (amended).qxd 21/12/06 13:34 Page 1
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
10
reproduced in Table 3. It should be noted that there is no advice given
for plant rooms.
At the time of writing not all the parts of Eurocode 1 and their National
Annexes are available; it is advised that existing standards are considered
for use where European standards have not yet been issued.
Load arrangements
The term load arrangements refers to the arranging of variable actions
(e.g. imposed and wind loads) to give the most onerous forces in a
member or structure and are given in Eurocode 2 and its UK NA.
For building structures, the UK NA to Eurocode 2, Part 11 allows any
of the following sets of load arrangements to be used for both the
ultimate limit state and serviceability limit state:
Load set 1. Alternate or adjacent spans loaded
The design values should be obtained from the more critical of:
Alternate spans carrying the design variable and permanent loads
with other spans loaded with only the design permanent load (see
Figure 1). The value of
g
G
should be the same throughout.
Any two adjacent spans carrying the design variable and
permanent loads with other spans loaded with only the design
permanent load (see Figure 2). The value of
g
G
should be the
same throughout.
Load set 2. All or alternate spans loaded
The design values should be obtained from the more critical of:
All spans carrying the design variable and permanent loads
(see Figure 3).
Alternate spans carrying the design variable and permanent loads
with other spans loaded with only the design permanent load (see
Figure 1). The value of
g
G
should be the same throughout.
Generally, load set 2 will be used for beams and slabs in the UK as it
requires three load arrangements to be considered, while load set 1
will often require more than three arrangements to be assessed.
Alternatively, the UK NA makes the following provision for slabs.
Load set 3. Simplified arrangements for slabs
The load arrangements can be simplified for slabs where it is only
necessary to consider the all spans loaded arrangement (see Figure 3),
provided the following conditions are met:
In a one-way spanning slab the area of each bay exceeds 30 m
2
(a bay means a strip across the full width of a structure bounded
on the other sides by lines of support).
The ratio of the variable actions (Q
k
) to the permanent actions (G
k
)
does not exceed 1.25.
The magnitude of the variable actions excluding partitions does not
exceed 5 kN/m
2
.
2
Figure 2
Adjacent spans loaded
Figure 3
All spans loaded
Figure 1
Alternate spans loaded
Table 1
Indicative design working life (from UK National Annex to Eurocode)
Design life (years) Examples
10 Temporary structures
1030 Replaceable structural parts
1525 Agricultural and similar structures
50 Buildings and other common structures
120 Monumental buildings, bridges and other civil
engineering structures
Table 2
Selected bulk density of materials (from Eurocode 1, Part 11)
Material Bulk density (kN/m
3
)
Normal weight concrete 24.0
Reinforced normal weight concrete 25.0
Wet normal weight reinforced concrete 26.0
10
11
2. Getting started
3
Combination of actions
The term combination of actions refers to the value of actions to be
used when a limit state is under the influence of different actions.
The numerical values of the partial factors for the ULS combination can
be obtained by referring to Eurocode: Basis of structural design or to
Chapter 1.
.(
There are three SLS combinations of actions characteristic, frequent
and quasi-permanent. The numerical values are given in Eurocode: Basis
of structural design.
Material properties
Concrete
In Eurocode 2 the design of reinforced concrete is based on the
characteristic cylinder strength rather than cube strength and should
be specified according to BS 8500: Concrete complementary British
Standard to BS EN 2061
7
(e.g. for class C28/35 concrete the cylinder
strength is 28 MPa, whereas the cube strength is 35 MPa). Typical
concrete properties are given in Table 4.
Concrete up to class C90/105 can be designed using Eurocode 2.
For classes above C50/60, however, there are additional rules and
variations. For this reason, the design of these higher classes is not
considered in this publication.
It should be noted that designated concretes (e.g. RC30) still refer
to the cube strength.
Reinforcing steel
Eurocode 2 can be used with reinforcement of characteristic
strengths ranging from 400 to 600 MPa. The properties of steel
reinforcement in the UK for use with Eurocode 2 are given in
BS 4449 (2005): Specification for carbon steel bars for the
reinforcement of concrete
8
and are summarised in Table 5 (on page 4).
A characteristic yield strength of 500 MPa has been adopted by the
UK reinforcement industry. There are three classes of reinforcement,
A, B and C, which provide increasing ductility. Class A is not suitable
where redistribution of 20% and above has been assumed in the
design. There is no provision for the use of plain bar or mild steel
reinforcement, but guidance is given in the background paper to the
National Annex
9
.
Table 4
Selected concrete properties based on Table 3.1 of Eurocode 2, Part 11
Table 3
Selected imposed loads for buildings (from draft UK National Annex to Eurocode 1, Part 11)
For members supporting one variable action the ULS combination
1.25 G
k
+ 1.5 Q
k
(derived from Exp. (6.10b), Eurocode)
can be used provided the permanent actions are not greater than
4.5 times the variable actions (except for storage loads).
Symbol Description Properties
f
ck
(MPa) Characteristic cylinder strength 12 16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 28
a
32
a
f
ck,cube
(MPa) Characteristic cube strength 15 20 25 30 37 45 50 55 60 35 40
f
ctm
(MPa) Mean tensile strength 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.8 4.1 2.8 3.0
E
cm
b
(GPa) Secant modulus of elasticity 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 37 32 34
Key
a Concrete class not cited in Table 3.1, Eurocode 2, Part 11
b Mean secant modulus of elasticity at 28 days for concrete with quartzite aggregates. For concretes with other aggregates refer to Cl 3.1.3 (2)
Category Example use q
k
(kN/m
2
) Q
k
(kN)
A1 All uses within self-contained dwelling units 1.5 2.0
A2 Bedrooms and dormitories 1.5 2.0
A3 Bedrooms in hotels and motels, hospital wards and toilets 2.0 2.0
A5 Balconies in single family dwelling units 2.5 2.0
A7 Balconies in hotels and motels 4.0 min. 2.0 at outer edge
B1 Offices for general use 2.5 2.7
C5 Assembly area without fixed seating, concert halls, bars, places of worship 5.0 3.6
D1/2 Shopping areas 4.0 3.6
E12 General storage 2.4 per m height 7.0
E17 Dense mobile stacking in warehouses 4.8 per m height (min. 15.0) 7.0
F Gross vehicle weight 30kN 2.5 10.0
11
2. Getting started
12 4
Structural analysis
The primary purpose of structural analysis in building structures is to
establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the
whole or part of a structure and to identify the critical design
conditions at all sections. The geometry is commonly idealised by
considering the structure to be made up of linear elements and plane
two-dimensional elements.
The type of analysis should be appropriate to the problem being
considered. The following may be used: linear elastic analysis, linear
elastic analysis with limited redistribution, and plastic analysis. Linear
elastic analysis may be carried out assuming cross sections are
uncracked (i.e. concrete section properties); using linear stress-strain
relationships, and assuming mean values of elastic modulus.
For the ultimate limit state only, the moments derived from elastic
analysis may be redistributed (up to a maximum of 30%) provided
that the resulting distribution of moments remains in equilibrium with
the applied loads and subject to certain limits and design criteria (e.g.
limitations of depth to neutral axis).
Regardless of the method of analysis used, the following principles apply:
Where a beam or slab is monolithic with its supports, the critical
design hogging moment may be taken as that at the face of the
support, but should not be taken as less than 0.65 times the full
fixed end moment.
Where a beam or slab is continuous over a support that may be
considered not to provide rotational restraint, the moment
calculated at the centre line of the support may be reduced by
(F
Ed,sup
t/8), where F
Ed,sup
is the support reaction and t is the breadth
of the support.
For the design of columns the elastic moments from the frame
action should be used without any redistribution.
Bending moment and shear force co-efficients for beams are given in
Table 6; these are suitable where spans are of similar length and the
other notes to the table are observed.
Minimum concrete cover
The nominal cover can be assessed as follows:
Where c
min
should be set to satisfy the requirements below:
safe transmission of bond forces
durability
fire resistance
and D c
dev
is an allowance which should be made in the design for
deviations from the minimum cover. It should be taken as 10 mm,
unless fabrication (i.e. construction) is subjected to a quality assurance
system, in which case it is permitted to reduce D c
dev
to 5 mm.
Table 6
Bending moment and shear co-efficients for beams
Table 7
Exposure classes
Class Description
No risk of corrosion or attack
X0 For concrete without reinforcement or embedded metal where there
is no significant freeze/thaw, abrasion or chemical attack.
Corrosion induced by carbonation
XC1 Dry or permanently wet
XC2 Wet, rarely dry
XC3/4 Moderate humidity or cyclic wet and dry
Corrosion induced by chlorides other than from seawater
XD1 Moderate humidity
XD2 Wet, rarely dry
XD3 Cyclic wet and dry
Corrosion induced by chlorides from seawater
XS1 Exposed to airborne salt but not in direct contact with sea water
XS2 Permanently submerged
XS3 Tidal, splash and spray zones
Freeze/thaw with or without de-icing agents
XF1 Moderate water saturation without de-icing agent
XF2 Moderate water saturation with de-icing agent
XF3 High water saturation without de-icing agent
XF4 High water saturation with de-icing agent or sea water
Chemical attack (ACEC classes)
Refer to BS 85001 and Special Digest 1
11
Table 5
Characteristic tensile properties of reinforcement
Class (BS 4449) and designation (BS 8666) A B C
Characteristic yield strength f
yk
or f
0.2k
(MPa) 500 500 500
Minimum value of k = ( f
t
/f
y
)
k
1.05 1.08 1.15 < 1.35
Characteristic strain at maximum force e
uk
(%) 2.5 5.0 7.5
Notes
1 Table derived from BS EN 199211 Annex C, BS 4449: 2005 and BS EN 10080
10
.
2 The nomenclature used in BS 4449: 2005 differs from that used in BS EN 199211
Annex C and used here.
3 In accordance with BS 8666, class H may be specified, in which case class A, B or C
may be supplied.
Moment Shear
Outer support 25% of span moment 0.45 (G + Q)
Near middle of end span 0.090 Gl + 0.100 Ql
At first interior support 0.094 (G + Q) l 0.63 (G + Q)
a
At middle of interior spans 0.066 Gl + 0.086 Ql
At interior supports 0.075 (G + Q) l 0.50 (G + Q)
Key
a 0.55 (G + Q) may be used adjacent to the interior span.
Notes
1 Redistribution of support moments by 15% has been included.
2 Applicable to 3 or more spans only and where Q
k
G
k
.
3 Minimum span 0.85 longest span.
4 l is the effective length, G is the total of the ULS permanent actions, Q is the total
of the ULS variable actions.
c
nom
= c
min
+ D c
dev
Exp. (4.1)
12
13
2. Getting started
5
Minimum cover for bond
The minimum cover to ensure adequate bond should not be less than
the bar diameter, or equivalent bar diameter for bundled bars, unless
the aggregate size is over 32 mm.
Minimum cover for durability
The recommendations for durability in Eurocode 2 are based on
BS EN 2061
12
. In the UK the requirements of BS EN 206 1 are
applied through the complementary standard BS 8500. The UK
National Annex (Table 4.3 (N) (BS)) gives durability requirements that
comply with BS 8500, but which significantly modify the approach
taken in Eurocode 2. To determine the minimum cover for durability
(and also the strength class and minimum water cement ratio) either
the UK National Annex or BS 8500 can be used.
The various exposure classes from BS 8500 are given in Table 7. Selected
recommendations are given in Table 8 (on page 6) for the concrete
strength, minimum cement ratio, minimum concrete cover and maximum
cement content for various elements in a structure based on the exposure
of that element. This is taken from Chapter 11, originally published as
How to use BS 8500 with BS 8110
13
.
Design for fire resistance
Eurocode 2 Part 12: Structural fire design
14
, gives several methods
for determining the fire resistance of concrete elements; further
guidance can be obtained from specialist literature. Design for
fire resistance may still be carried out by referring to tables to
determine the minimum cover and dimensions for various elements,
as set out below.
Rather than giving the minimum cover, the tabular method is based
on nominal axis distance, a (see Figure 4). This is the distance from the
centre of the main reinforcing bar to the surface of the member. It is
a nominal (not minimum) dimension. The designer should ensure that
a c
nom
+ f
link
+ f
bar
/2.
There are three standard fire exposure conditions that may be satisfied:
R Mechanical resistance for load bearing
E Integrity of separation
I Insulation
Tables 9 and 10 give the minimum dimensions for columns and slabs
to meet the above conditions. The tables offer more flexibility than
BS 8110 in that there are options available to the designer e.g. section
sizes can be reduced by increasing the axis distance. Further information
is given in Eurocode 2 and subsequent chapters, including design
limitations and data for walls and beams.
Table 9
Minimum column dimensions and axis distances for columns with
rectangular or circular section method A
Standard fire Minimum dimensions (mm)
resistance Column width ( b
min
)/axis distance (a) of the main bars
Column exposed on more Exposed on one side
than one side (
m
f i
= 0.7) (
m
f i
= 0.7)
R 60 250/46 155/25
350/40
R 120 350/57* 175/35
450/51*
R 240 295/70
Notes
1 Refer to BS EN 199212 for design limitations.
2
m
fi
is the ratio of the design axial load under fire conditions to the design resistance
of the column at normal temperature conditions. Conservatively
m
fi
may be taken
as 0.7
* Minimum 8 bars
Method B indicates 600/70 for R 240 and
m
fi
= 0.7 and may be used.
See EN 199212 Table 5.2b
Standard Minimum dimensions (mm)
fire
One-way Two-way spanning slab Flat slab Ribs in a two-way spanning ribbed slab
resistance
spanning slab
l
y
/l
x
1.5 1.5 < l
y
/l
x
2 (b
min
is the width of the rib)
REI 60 h
s
= 80 80 80 180 b
min
= 100 120 200
a = 20 10 15 15 a = 25 15 10
REI 120 h
s
= 120 120 120 200 b
min
= 160 190 300
a = 40 20 25 35 a = 45 40 30
REI 240 h
s
= 175 175 175 200 b
min
= 450 700
a = 65 40 50 50 a = 70 60
Notes
1 Refer to BS EN 199212 for design limitations.
2 a is the axis distance (see Figure 4).
3 h
s
is the slab thickness, including any non-combustible flooring.
Figure 4
Sections through structural members, showing nominal axis distance, a
Table 10
Minimum dimensions and axis distances for reinforced concrete slabs
13
2. Getting started
14 6
Table 8
Selected
a
recommendations for normal-weight reinforced concrete quality for combined exposure classes and cover to reinforcement for at least a
50-year intended working life and 20 mm maximum aggregate size
Exposure conditions Cement/
combination
designations
b
Nominal cover to reinforcement
d
Typical example Primary Secondary
15 +Dc
dev
20 +Dc
dev
25 +Dc
dev
30 +Dc
dev
35 +Dc
dev
40 +Dc
dev
45 +Dc
dev
50 +Dc
dev
Strength class
c
, maximum w/c ratio, minimum cement or combination
content (kg/m
3
), and equivalent designated concrete (where applicable)
Recommended that this exposure is not applied to reinforced concrete
Internal mass
concrete
Internal elements
(except humid
locations)
Buried concrete
in AC-1 ground
conditions
e
Vertical surface
protected from
direct rainfall
Exposed vertical
surfaces
Exposed horizontal
surfaces
Elements subject
to airborne
chlorides
Car park decks and
areas subject to
de-icing spray
Vertical elements
subject to de-icing
spray and freezing
Car park decks,
ramps and external
areas subject to
freezing and
de-icing salts
Exposed vertical
surfaces near coast
Exposed horizontal
surfaces near coast
X0
___
XC1
XC2
XC3
&
XC4
XD1
f
XD3
f
XS1
f
___
AC-1
___
XF1
XF3
___
___
XF2
XF4
XF4 (air
entrained)
XF4
XF1
XF3 (air
entrained)
All
All
All
All except IVB
All except IVB
All except IVB
All except IVB
All
IIB-V, IIIA
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIIB, IVB-V
IIB-V, IIIA
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIIB, IVB-V
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIB-V, IIIA, IIIB
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIB-V, IIIA
IIIB
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
C20/25,
0.70, 240 or
RC20/25
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
___
C40/50,
0.45, 340 or
RC40/50
C40/50,
0.45, 340 or
RC40/50
C40/50,0.45,
340
g
or
RC40/50XF
g
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
C25/30,
0.65, 260 or
RC25/30
C30/37,
0.55, 300
or RC30/37
C30/37,
0.55, 300
or RC30/37
<<<
C32/40,
0.55, 300
plus air
g,h
C40/50,
0.45, 360
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
<<<
C28/35,
0.60, 280 or
RC28/35
C28/35,
0.60, 280 or
RC28/35
<<<
C28/35,
0.60, 280
plus air
g,h
or PAV2
C32/40,
0.55, 320
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
See
BS 8500
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
<<<
<<<
C25/30,
0.65, 260 or
RC25/30
<<<
<<<
C25/30,
0.60, 280
plus air
g, h, j
or PAV1
C28/35,
0.60, 300
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C25/30,
0.50, 340
C40/50,
0.45, 360
g
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C35/45,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
C35/45,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C28/35,
0.40, 380
g, h
C32/40,
0.50, 340
C28/35,
0.50, 340
C25/30,
0.50, 340
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
C28/35,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
C32/40
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
g
C28/35
0.45, 360
g, h
<<<
C25/30,
0.55, 320
C25/30,
0.55, 320
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C28/35,
0.50, 340
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C25/30,
0.50, 340
C32/40,
0.50, 340
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.50, 340
<<<
C28/35,
0.50, 340
g, h
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
___
Not recommended
<<< Indicates that concrete
quality in cell to the left
should not be reduced
Key
a This table comprises a selection of common exposure class combinations.
Requirements for other sets of exposure classes, e.g. XD2, XS2 and XS3 should
be derived from BS 8500-1: 2002, Annex A.
b See BS 8500-2, Table 1. (CEM I is Portland cement, IIA to IVB are cement combinations.)
c For prestressed concrete the minimum strength class should be C28/35.
d Dc
dev
is an allowance for deviations.
e For sections less than 140 mm thick refer to BS 8500.
f Also adequate for exposure class XC3/4.
g Freeze/thaw resisting aggregates should be specified.
h Air entrained concrete is required.
j This option may not be suitable for areas subject to
severe abrasion.
14
BS 8500 for building structures
3
Table 2
Selected
a
combination
designations
b
d
15 +Dc
dev
20 +Dc
dev
25 +Dc
dev
30 +Dc
dev
35 +Dc
dev
40 +Dc
dev
45 +Dc
dev
50 +Dc
dev
Strength class
c
content (kg/m
3
Internal mass
concrete
Internal elements
(except humid
locations)
Buried concrete
in AC-1 ground
conditions
e
Vertical surface
protected from
direct rainfall
Exposed vertical
surfaces
Exposed horizontal
surfaces
Elements subject
to airborne
chlorides
Car park decks and
areas subject to
de-icing spray
Vertical elements
subject to de-icing
spray and freezing
Car park decks,
ramps and external
areas subject to
freezing and
de-icing salts
Exposed vertical
surfaces near coast
Exposed horizontal
surfaces near coast
X0
___
XC1
XC2
XC3
&
XC4
XD1
f
XD3
f
XS1
f
___
AC-1
___
XF1
XF3
___
___
XF2
XF4
XF4 (air
entrained)
XF3 or
XF4
XF1
XF3 (air
entrained)
All
All
All
All except
IVB-V
All except
IVB-V
All except
IVB-V
All except
IVB-V
All
IIB-V, IIIA
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIIB, IVB-V
IIB-V, IIIA
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIIB, IVB-V
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIB-V, IIIA, IIIB
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIB-V, IIIA
IIIB
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
C20/25,
0.70, 240 or
RC20/25
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
___
C40/50,
0.45, 340 or
RC40/50
C40/50,
0.45, 340 or
RC40/50
C40/50,0.45,
340
g
or
RC40/50XF
g
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
C25/30,
0.65, 260 or
RC25/30
C30/37,
0.55, 300
or RC30/37
C30/37,
0.55, 300
or RC30/37
<<<
C30/37,
0.55, 300
plus air
g,h
C40/50,
0.45, 360
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
<<<
C28/35,
0.60, 280 or
RC28/35
C28/35,
0.60, 280 or
RC28/35
<<<
C28/35,
0.60, 280
plus air
g,h
or PAV2
C32/40,
0.55, 320
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
See
BS 8500
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
<<<
<<<
C25/30,
0.65, 260 or
RC25/30
<<<
<<<
C25/30,
0.60, 280
plus air
g, h, j
or PAV1
C28/35,
0.60, 300
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C25/30,
0.50, 340
C40/50,
0.45, 360
g
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C35/45,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
C35/45,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C28/35,
0.40, 380
g, h
C32/40,
0.50, 340
C28/35,
0.50, 340
C25/30,
0.50, 340
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
C28/35,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
C32/40
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
g
C28/35
0.45, 360
g, h
<<<
C28/35,
0.55, 320
C25/30,
0.55, 320
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C28/35,
0.50, 340
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C25/30,
0.50, 340
C32/40,
0.50, 340
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.50, 340
<<<
C28/35,
0.50, 340
g, h
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
___
Not recommended
Key
d Dc
dev
severe abrasion.
___
11_BS8500.qxd 10/4/07 12:47 Page 3
15
a) Bracing system b) Floor diaphragm c) Roof diaphragm
2. Getting started
7
Figure 5
Examples of the effect of geometric imperfections
Stability and imperfections
The effects of geometric imperfections should be considered in
combination with the effects of wind loads (i.e. not as an alternative
load combination). For global analysis, the imperfections may be
represented by an inclination y
i
.
y
i
= (1/200) x a
h
x a
m
where
a
h
= (2/Rl), to be taken as not less than 2/3 nor greater than 1.0
a
m
= [0.5 (1 + 1/m)]
0
.
5
l is the height of the building in metres
m is the number of vertical members contributing to the horizontal
force in the bracing system.
The effect of the inclination may be represented by transverse forces at
each level and included in the analysis along with other actions (see
Figure 5):
Effect on bracing system: H
i
= y
i
(N
b
N
a
)
Effect on floor diaphragm: H
i
= y
i
(N
b
+ N
a
)/2
Effect on roof diaphragm: H
i
= y
i
N
a
where N
a
and N
b
are longitudinal forces contributing to H
i
.
In most cases, an allowance for imperfections is made in the partial
factors used in the design of elements. However for columns, the effect
of imperfections, which is similar in principle to the above, must be
considered (see Chapter 5, originally published as Columns
15
).
Steel
stress
(s
s
)MPa
OR OR
Table 11
Maximum bar size or spacing to limit crack width
w
max
= 0.4 mm w
max
= 0.3 mm
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
bar bar bar bar
size (mm) spacing (mm) size (mm) spacing (mm)
160 40 300 32 300
200 32 300 25 250
240 20 250 16 200
280 16 200 12 150
320 12 150 10 100
360 10 100 8 50
Note
The steel stress may be estimated from the expression below (or see Figure 6):
s
s
= f
yk
mA
s,req
g
ms
n A
s,prov
d
where
f
yk
= characteristic reinforcement yield stress
g
ms
= partial factor for reinforcing steel
m = total load from quasi-permanent combination
n = total load from ULS combination
A
s,req
= area of reinforcement at the ULS
A
s,prov
= area of reinforcement provided
d = ratio of redistributed moment to elastic moment
Crack control
Crack widths should be limited to ensure appearance and durability
are satisfactory. In the absence of specific durability requirements
(e.g. water tightness) the crack widths may be limited to 0.3 mm in
all exposure classes under the quasi-permanent combination. In the
absence of requirements for appearance, this limit may be relaxed (to
say 0.4 mm) for exposure classes X0 and XC1 (refer to Table 7). The
theoretical size of the crack can be calculated using the expressions
given in Cl 7.3.4 from Eurocode 211 or from the deemed to satisfy
requirements that can be obtained from Table 11, which is based on
tables 7.2N and 7.3N of the Eurocode. The limits apply to either the
bar size or the bar spacing, not both.
Figure 6
Determination of steel stress for crack width control
To determine stress in the reinforcement (s
s
), calculate the ratio G
k
/Q
k
,
read up the graph to the appropriate curve and read across to determine s
su
.
s
s
can be calculated from the expression: s
s
= s
su
A
s,req
A
s,prov
1
d
( ( ) )
15
2. Getting started
16
References
2 INSTITUTION OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS/THE CONCRETE SOCIETY. Standard method of detailing. ISE/CS. 2006.
3 NARAYANAN, R S & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Introduction to Eurocodes (TCC/03/16). The Concrete Centre, 2005.
4 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1990, Eurocode: Basis of structural design. BSI, 2002.
5 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1991, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. BSI (10 parts).
6 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1991, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part 11: General actions Densities, self-weight, imposed loads
for buildings. BSI, 2002.
7 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 85001: Concrete Complementary British Standard to BS EN 2061 Part 1: Method of specifying and
guidance for the specifier. BSI, 2002.
8 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 4449: Specification for carbon steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete. BSI, 2005.
9 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. Background paper to the UK National Annex to BS EN 199211. BSI, 2006.
10 BRITISH STAND ARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 10080: Steel for the reinforcement of concrete Weldable reinforcing steel General. BSI, 2005.
11 BUILDING RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT. Special Digest 1: Concrete in aggressive ground. BRE, 2005.
12 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 2061: Concrete Part: Specification, performance, production and conformity. BSI, 2000.
13 HARRISON, T A BROOKER, O. How to use BS 8500 with BS 8110 (TCC/03/11). The Concrete Centre, 2005.
14 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199212, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules structural fire design, BSI, 2004.
15 MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Columns, (TCC/03/20). The Concrete Centre, 2006.
2. Getting started
16
2. Getting started
Ref: TCC/03/17
ISBN 1-904818-27-7
First published December 2005, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
Acknowledgements
Designing to Eurocode 2
This chapter covers the analysis and design of slabs to Eurocode 2
1
which is
essentially the same as with BS 8110
2
. However, the layout and content of
Eurocode 2 may appear unusual to designers familiar with BS 8110. Eurocode 2
does not contain the derived formulae or specific guidance on determining
moments and shear forces. This has arisen because it has been European
practice to give principles in the codes and for the detailed application to
be presented in other sources such as textbooks.
Chapter 1, originally published as Introduction to Eurocodes
3
, highlighted the
key differences between Eurocode 2 and BS 8110, including terminology.
Chapter 7, originally published as Flat slabs
4
covers the design of flat slabs.
It should be noted that values from the UK National Annex (NA) have been
used throughout, including values that are embedded in derived formulae.
(Derivations can be found at www.eurocode2.info.) A list of symbols related to
slab design is given at the end of this chapter.
Design procedure
A procedure for carrying out the detailed design of slabs is shown in Table 1.
This assumes that the slab thickness has previously been determined during
conceptual design. More detailed advice on determining design life, actions,
material properties, methods of analysis, minimum concrete cover for
durability and control of crack widths can be found in Chapter 2, originally
published as Getting started
5
.
Fire resistance
6
, gives a choice of advanced,
simplified or tabular methods for determining the fire resistance. Using tables
is the fastest method for determining the minimum dimensions and cover for
slabs. There are, however, some restrictions which should be adhered to.
Further guidance on the advanced and simplified methods can be obtained
from specialist literature.
Rather than giving a minimum cover, the tabular method is based on
nominal axis distance, a. This is the distance from the centre of the main
reinforcing bar to the surface of the member. It is a nominal (not minimum)
3. Slabs
R M Moss BSc, PhD, DIC, CEng, MICE, MIStructE O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
Continues page 19
03_Slabs (amended).qxd 21/12/06 09:09 Page 1
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
18
Standard fire Minimum dimensions (mm)
resistance
One-way
a, b
Two-way spanning slab
a,b,c,d
Ribs in a two-way spanning ribbed slab
e
spanning slab
l
y
/l
x
1.5
f
1.5 <l
y
/l
x
2
f
2
Table 1
Slab design procedure
REI 60
REI 90
REI 120
REI 240
h
s
=
a =
h
s
=
a =
h
s
=
a =
h
s
=
a =
80
20
100
30
120
40
175
65
80
10
g
100
15
g
120
20
175
40
80
15
g
100
20
120
25
175
50
b
min
=
a =
b
min
=
a =
b
min
=
a =
b
min
=
a =
100
25
120
35
160
45
450
70
120
15
g
160
25
190
40
700
60
200
10
g
250
15
g
300
30
Notes
1 This table is taken from BS EN 199212 Tables 5.8 to 5.11. For flat slabs refer to
Chapter 7.
2 The table is valid only if the detailing requirements (see note 3) are observed and in
normal temperature design redistribution of bending moments does not exceed 15%.
3 For fire resistance of R90 and above, for a distance of 0.3l
eff
from the centre line of each
intermediate support, the area of top reinforcement should not be less than the following:
A
s,req
(x) = A
s,req
( 0) ( 1 2.5( x/ l
eff
) )
where:
x is the distance of the section being considered from the centre
line of the support.
A
s,req
( 0) is the area of reinforcement required for normal temperature design.
A
s,req
(x) is the minimum area of reinforcement required at the section
being considered but not less than that required for normal
temperature design.
l
eff
is the greater of the effective lengths of the two adjacent spans.
4 There are three standard fire exposure conditions that need to be satisfied:
I Insulation
5 The ribs in a one-way spanning ribbed slab can be treated as beams and reference can
be made to Chapter 4, Beams. The topping can be treated as a two-way slab where
1.5 < l
y
/ l
x
2.
Key
a The slab thickness h
s
is the sum of the slab thickness and the thickness of any
non-combustible flooring.
b For continuous solid slabs a minimum negative reinforcement A
s
0.005 A
c
should be provided over intermediate supports if
1) cold worked reinforcement is used; or
2) there is no fixity over the end supports in a two span slab; or
3) where transverse redistribution of load effects cannot be achieved.
c In two way slabs the axis refers to the lower layer of reinforcement.
d The term two way slabs relates to slabs supported at all four edges. If this is
not the case, they should be treated as one-way spanning slabs.
e For two-way ribbed slabs the following notes apply:
The axis distance measured to the lateral surface of the rib should be at
least (a + 10).
The values apply where there is predominantly uniformly distributed loading.
There should be at least one restrained edge.
The top reinforcement should be placed in the upper half of the flange.
f l
x
and l
y
are the spans of a two-way slab (two directions at right angles) where
l
y
is the longer span.
g Normally the requirements of BS EN 199211 will determine the cover.
Table 2
Minimum dimensions and axis distances for reinforced concrete slabs (excluding flat slabs)
Step Task Further guidance
Chapter in this publication Standard
1 Determine design life 2: Getting started NA to BS EN 1990 Table NA.2.1
2 Assess actions on the slab 2: Getting started BS EN 1991 (10 parts) and National Annexes
3 Determine which combinations of actions apply 1: Introduction to Eurocodes NA to BS EN 1990 Tables NA.A1.1 and NA.A1.2 (B)
4 Determine loading arrangements 2: Getting started NA to BS EN 199211
5 Assess durability requirements and determine concrete strength 2: Getting started BS 8500: 2002
6 Check cover requirements for appropriate fire resistance period 2: Getting started and Table 2 Approved Document B. BS EN 199212: Section 5
7 Calculate min. cover for durability, fire and bond requirements 2: Getting started BS EN 199211 Cl 4.4.1
8 Analyse structure to obtain critical moments and shear forces 2: Getting started and Table 3 BS EN 199211 section 5
9 Design flexural reinforcement See Figure 1 BS EN 199211 section 6.1
10 Check deflection See Figure 3 BS EN 199211 section 7.4
11 Check shear capacity See Table 7 BS EN 199211 section 6.2
12 Check spacing of bars 2: Getting started BS EN 199211 section 7.3
Note
NA = National Annex.
18
19
End support /slab connection First Interior Interior
Pinned Continuous
interior spans supports
End End End End
support
support span support span
Moment 0 0.086Fl 0.04Fl 0.075Fl 0.086Fl 0.063Fl 0.063Fl
Shear 0.40F 0.46F 0.6F 0.5F
Notes
1 Applicable to one-way spanning slabs where the area of each bay exceeds 30 m
2
,
Q
k
1.25 G
k
and q
k
5 kN/m
2
2 F is the total design ultimate load, l is the span
3 Minimum span > 0.85 longest span, minimum 3 spans
4 Based on 20% redistribution at supports and no decrease in span moments
3. Slabs
3
f
ck
f
ctm
Minimum%(0.26 f
ctm
/f
yk
a
)
25 2.6 0.13%
28 2.8 0.14%
30 2.9 0.15%
32 3.0 0.16%
35 3.2 0.17%
40 3.5 0.18%
45 3.8 0.20%
50 4.1 0.21%
Key
a Where f
yk
= 500 MPa.
Table 3
Bending moment and shear coefficients for slabs
Table 4
Values for K
Table 6
Minimum percentage of reinforcement required
%redistribution d (redistribution ratio) K
0 1.00 0.208
a
10 0.90 0.182
a
15 0.85 0.168
20 0.80 0.153
25 0.75 0.137
30 0.70 0.120
K z/d
0.05 0.950
a
0.06 0.944
0.07 0.934
0.08 0.924
0.09 0.913
0.10 0.902
0.11 0.891
0.12 0.880
K z/d
0.13 0.868
0.14 0.856
0.15 0.843
0.16 0.830
0.17 0.816
0.18 0.802
0.19 0.787
0.20 0.771
Carry out analysis of slab to determine design moments (M)
(Where appropriate use coefficients from Table 3)
Obtain lever arm z from Table 5 or
Calculate tension reinforcement required from
Check minimum reinforcement requirements (see Table 6)
No compression reinforcement required
Check maximum reinforcement requirements
A
s, max
= 0.04 A
c
for tension or compression
reinforcement outside lap locations
Determine K from Table 4 or
K = 0.60d 0.18d
2
0.21 where d 1.0
Outside scope of
this publication
Compression
reinforcement
required not
recommended for
typical slabs
START
Concrete class
C50/60?
Is K K ?
Yes
Yes
No
No
Determine K from: K =
Figure 1
Procedure for determining flexural reinforcement
dimension, so the designer should ensure that
a c
nom
+ f
link
+ f
bar
/2.
The requirements for various types of slab are given in Table 2.
Flexure
The design procedure for flexural design is given in Figure 1; this
includes derived formulae based on the simplified rectangular stress
block from Eurocode 2. Where appropriate, Table 3 may be used to
determine bending moments and shear forces for slabs. Further
information for the design of two-way, ribbed or waffle slabs is given in
the appropriate sections on pages 5 and 6.
bd
2
f
ck
M
1 + 1 3.53K 0.95d z =
2
d
[ ]
A
s
=
f
yd
z
M
A
s, min
= where f
ck
25
f
yk
0.26 f
ctm
b
t
d
Key
a Limiting z to 0.95d is not a requirement of Eurocode 2, but is considered to be good practice.
Table 5
z/d for singly reinforced rectangular sections
Key
a It is often recomended in the UK that K should be limited to 0.168 to ensure ductile failure.
19
3. Slabs
20 4
Figure 2
Simplified rectangular stress block for concrete up to class C50/60 from Eurocode 2
Deflection
Eurocode 2 has two alternative methods of designing for deflection,
either by limiting span-to-depth ratio or by assessing the theoretical
deflection using the Expressions given in the Eurocode. The latter
is dealt with in detail in Chapter 8, originally published as Deflection
calculations
7
.
The span-to-depth ratios should ensure that deflection is limited to
span /250 and this is the procedure presented in Figure 3.
Eurocode 2 offers various methods for determining the stress-strain
relationship of concrete. For simplicity and familiarity the method
presented here is the simplified rectangular stress block, which is
similar to that found in BS 8110 (see Figure 2).
The Eurocode gives recommendations for the design of concrete up to
class C90/105. However, for concrete greater than class C50/60, the stress
block is modified. It is important to note that concrete strength is based
on the cylinder strength and not the cube strength (i.e. for class C28/35
the cylinder strength is 28 MPa, whereas the cube strength is 35 MPa).
Figure 4
Determination of steel stress
Figure 3
Procedure for assessing deflection
s
), calculate the ratio
G
k
/Q
k
, read up the graph to the appropriate curve and read across
to determine s
su
.
s
s
s
= s
su
A
s,req
A
s,prov
1
d
( ( ) )
Is basic l/d x F1 x F2 x F3 Actual l/d ?
Increase
A
s,prov
Determine Factor 3 (F3)
F3 = 310/s
s
Where s
s
= Stress in reinforcement at serviceability
limit state (see Figure 4)
s
s
may be assumed to be 310 MPa (i.e. F3 = 1.0)
Note: A
s,prov
1.5 A
s,reqd
(UK National Annex)
Determine basic l/d from Figure 5
Check complete
For ribbed or waffle slabs
F1 = 1 0.1 ((b
f
/b
w
) 1) 0.8
(b
f
is flange breadth and b
w
is rib breadth)
Otherwise F1 = 1.0
Where the slab span exceeds 7 m and it supports
brittle partitions, F2 = 7/l
eff
Otherwise F2 = 1.0
No
Yes
START
The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that this

was the intention of the drafting committee and is in line with current UK practice.
20
215
3. Slabs
5
Design for shear
It is not usual for a slab to contain shear reinforcement, therefore it is
only necessary to ensure that the concrete shear stress capacity
without shear reinforcement (v
Rd,c
see Table 7) is more than applied
shear stress (v
Ed
= V
Ed
/( bd )). Where shear reinforcement is required,
e.g. for ribs in a ribbed slab, refer to Chapter 4, originally published as
Beams
8
.
Two-way slabs
Unlike BS 8110 there is no specific guidance given in Eurocode 2 on
how to determine the bending moments for a two-way slab. The
assessment of the bending moment can be carried out using any
suitable method from Section 5 of the Code. However, co-efficients
may be obtained from Table 8 (taken from the Manual for the design of
building structures to Eurocode 2
9
) to determine bending moments per
unit width (M
sx
and M
sy
) where:
M
sx
= b
sx
w l
x
2
M
sy
= b
sy
w l
x
2
Where b
sx
and b
sy
are coefficients, l
x
is the shorter span and w (load
per unit area) is the STR ultimate limit state combination. For more
information on combinations refer toChapter 1, originally published as
Introduction to Eurocodes
3
.
Table 7
v
Rd,c
resistance of members without shear reinforcement, MPa
Figure 5
Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios
r
I
= Effective depth, d (mm)
A
s
/(bd)
200 225 250 275 300 350 400 450 500 600 750
0.25% 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.48 0.47 0.45 0.43 0.41 0.40 0.38 0.36
0.50% 0.59 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.54 0.52 0.51 0.49 0.48 0.47 0.45
0.75% 0.68 0.66 0.64 0.63 0.62 0.59 0.58 0.56 0.55 0.53 0.51
1.00% 0.75 0.72 0.71 0.69 0.68 0.65 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.59 0.57
1.25% 0.80 0.78 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.71 0.69 0.67 0.66 0.63 0.61
1.50% 0.85 0.83 0.81 0.79 0.78 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.70 0.67 0.65
1.75% 0.90 0.87 0.85 0.83 0.82 0.79 0.77 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.68
2.00% 0.94 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.85 0.82 0.80 0.78 0.77 0.74 0.71
k 2.000 1.943 1.894 1.853 1.816 1.756 1.707 1.667 1.632 1.577 1.516
Table derived from: v
Rd,c
= 0.12 k (100r
I
f
ck
)
1/3
0.035 k
1.5
f
ck
0.5
where k = 1 + R(200/d) 2 and r
I
= A
s
/(bd) 0.02
Note
1 This table has been prepared for f
ck
= 30.
2 Where r
I
exceeds 0.40% the following factors may be used:
f
ck
25 28 32 35 40 45 50
Factor 0.94 0.98 1.02 1.05 1.10 1.14 1.19
Notes
1 For two-way spanning slabs, the check should be
carried out on the basis of the shorter span.
2 This graph assumes simply supported span
condition (K = 1.0).
K = 1.5 for interior span condition
K = 1.3 for end span condition
K = 0.4 for cantilevers
3 Compression reinforcement, r, has been taken as 0.
4 Curves based on the following expressions:
where r r
0
and
where r > r
0
.
11+ + 3.2 1 = K
r
f
ck
r
0
1.5
d
l
f
ck
r
r
0
[ ( ) ]
11+ + = K
(
r r
)
f
ck
r
0
1.5
d
l
12
f
ck
r
0
r
[ ]
1.5
Percentage of tension reinforcement (A
s,reqd
/bd)
21
3. Slabs
22 6
Figure 6
Procedure for determining flexural capacity of flanged ribs
Ribbed or waffle slabs
Current practices for determining forces in ribbed and waffle slabs may also
be used for designs to Eurocode 2. Where a waffle slab is treated as a
two-way slab refer to previous section, but note that their torsional stiffness
is significantly less than for a two-way slab and the bending moment co-
efficients may not be applicable. Where it is treated as a flat slab reference
may be made to Chapter 7, originally published as Flat slabs
4
The position of the neutral axis in the rib should be determined, and
then the area of reinforcement can be calculated depending on
whether it lies in the flange or web (see flow chart in Figure 6). The
main differences compared with BS 8110 are that the assessment of
the flange width is more sophisticated (see Figures 7 and 8).
Where a slab is formed with permanent blocks or a with a topping
thickness less than 50 mm and one-tenth of the clear distance
between ribs it is recommended that a longitudinal shear check is
carried out to determine whether additional transverse reinforcement is
required (see BS EN 199211, Cl 6.2.4).
Table 8
Bending moment coefficients for two-way spanning rectangular slabs
supported by beams
Type or panel Short span coefficients for Long-span
and moments values of l
y
/l
x
coefficients
considered for all values
of l
y
/l
x
1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.0
Interior panels
Negative moment 0.031 0.044 0.053 0.059 0.063 0.032
at continuous edge
Positive moment 0.024 0.034 0.040 0.044 0.048 0.024
at midspan
One short edge discontinuous
Negative moment 0.039 0.050 0.058 0.063 0.067 0.037
at continuous edge
Positive moment 0.029 0.038 0.043 0.047 0.050 0.028
at midspan
One long edge discontinuous
Negative moment 0.039 0.059 0.073 0.083 0.089 0.037
at continuous edge
Positive moment 0.030 0.045 0.055 0.062 0.067 0.028
at midspan
Two adjacent edges discontinuous
Negative moment 0.047 0.066 0.078 0.087 0.093 0.045
at continuous edge
Positive moment 0.036 0.049 0.059 0.065 0.070 0.034
at midspan
START
Concrete class
C50/60?
Is x 1.25h
f
Is K
f
K
Outside scope
of this
publication
Neutral axis in
flange.
Design as
rectangular
section.
Redesign
section
Determine l
0
(see Figure 7) and b
eff
from:
b
eff
= (b
w
+ b
eff1
+ b
eff2
) where
b
eff1
= (0.2b
1
+ 0.1 l
0
) 0.2 l
0
b
1
b
eff2
= (0.2b
2
+ 0.1 l
0
) 0.2 l
0
b
2
Note: The flange width at the support will be
different from that at mid-span.
For symbols refer to Figures 7 and 8
K = 0.60d 0.18d
2
0.21 where d 1.0
Calculate depth to neutral axis x from:
x = 2.5 (d z)
Calculate lever arm z from
Neutral axis in web
Calculate moment capacity of flange from:
M
R,f
= 0.57 f
ck
(b
eff
b
w
) h
f
(d 0.5h
f
)
Calculate area of reinforcement required from
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
1 + 1 3.53K 0.95d z =
2
d
[ ]
bd
2
f
ck
M
A
s
= +
f
ywd
(d 0.5 h
f
)
M
R,f
f
ywd
z
M M
R,f
K
f
= and
f
ck
b
w
d
2
M M
R,f
Yes
22
237
3. Slabs
Rules for spacing and
quantity of reinforcement
Minimum area of principal reinforcement
The minimum area of principal reinforcement in the main direction is
A
s, min
= 0.26 f
c tm
b
t
d/f
y k
but not less than 0.0013b
t
d, where b
t
is the
mean width of the tension zone (see Table 6). For a T-beam with the
flange in compression, only the width of the web is taken into account
in calculating the value of b
t
.
Minimum area of secondary reinforcement
The minimum area of secondary transverse reinforcement is
20% A
s, min
. In areas near supports, transverse reinforcement is not
necessary where there is no transverse bending moment.
Maximum area of reinforcement
Outside lap locations, the maximum area of tension or compression
reinforcement should not exceed A
s, max
= 0.04 A
c
Minimum spacing of reinforcement
The minimum clear distance between bars should be the greater of:
Bar diameter
Aggregate size plus 5 mm
20 mm
Maximum spacing of reinforcement
For slabs less than 200 mm thick the following maximum spacing
rules apply:
For the principal reinforcement: 3h but not more than 400 mm
For the secondary reinforcement: 3.5h but not more than 450 mm
The exception is in areas with concentrated loads or areas of maximum
moment where the following applies:
For the secondary reinforcement: 3h but not more than 400 mm
Where h is the depth of the slab.
For slabs 200 mm thick or greater the bar size and spacing should be
limited to control the crack width and reference should be made to
section 7.3.3 of the Code or Chapter 2, originally published as Getting
started
5
.
Figure 7
Definition of l
0
, for calculation of effective flange width
Figure 8
Effective flange width parameters
Symbol Definition Value
A
c
Cross sectional area of concrete bh
A
s
Area of tension steel
A
s2
Area of compression steel
A
s, prov
Area of tension steel provided
A
s, reqd
Area of tension steel required
b
eff
Effective flange width
b
t
Mean width of the tension zone
b
min
Width of beam or rib
b
w
Width of rib web
d Effective depth
d
2
Effective depth to compression reinforcement
f
cd
Design value of concrete compressive strength a
cc
f
ck
/g
c
f
ck
Characteristic cylinder strength of concrete
f
ctm
Mean value of axial tensile strength 0.30 f
ck
2/3
for f
ck
C50/60
(from Table 3.1, Eurocode 2)
h
f
Flange thickness
h
s
Slab thickness
K Factor to take account of the different See Table NA.4 in
structural systems UK National Annex
l
eff
Effective span of member See Section 5.3.2.2 (1)
l
0
Distance between points of zero moment
l/d Limiting span-to-depth ratio
l
x
, l
y
Spans of a two-way slab
M Design moment at the ULS
x Depth to neutral axis (d z)/0.4
x
max
Limiting value for depth to neutral axis (d 0.4)d where d 1.0
z Lever arm
a
cc
Coefficient taking account of long term 0.85 for flexure and
effects on compressive strength and of axial loads.
unfavourable effects resulting from the 1.0 for other phenomena
way load is applied (From UK National Annex)
d Ratio of the redistributed moment to the
elastic bending moment
g
m
Partial factor for material properties 1.15 for reinforcement (g
s
)
1.5 for concrete (g
c
)
r
0
Reference reinforcement ratio Rf
ck
/1000
r Required tension reinforcement at mid-span A
s
/bd
to resist the moment due to the design
loads (or at support for cantilevers)
r Required compression reinforcement at A
s2
/bd
mid-span to resist the moment due to the
design loads (or at support for cantilevers)
Selected symbols
23
3. Slabs
24
3. Slabs
References
1 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199211: Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures Part 11 General rules and rules for buildings. BSI, 2004.
2 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 81101: The structural use of concrete Part 1, Code of practice for design and construction. BSI, 1997.
3 NARAYANAN, R S & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Introduction to Eurocodes. The Concrete Centre, 2005.
4 MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Flat slabs. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
5 BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Getting started. The Concrete Centre, 2005.
6 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199212, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules structural fire design, BSI 2004.
7 WEBSTER, R & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection calculations. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
8 MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Beams. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
9 THE INSTITUTION OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS/THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS. Manual for the design of concrete building structures to
Eurocode 2. IStructE/ICE, 2006.
24
3. Slabs
Ref: TCC/03/18
ISBN 1-904818-28-5
First published January 2006, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
Acknowledgements
4. Beams
4. Beams
R M Moss ;L\% Ia=% =B<% <>g`% FB<>% FBLmkn\m> O Brooker ;>g`% <>g`% FB<>% FBLmkn\m>
This chapter covers the analysis and design of concrete beams to Eurocode 2
1
which is essentially the same as with BS 8110
2
' Ahpô^k% maêZrhnmZg]
\hgm^gmh_>nkh\h]^+fZrZii^ZkngnlnZemh]^lb`g^kl_ZfbebZkpbma;L1**)'
>nkh\h]^+]h^lghm\hgmZbgma^]^kbo^]_hkfneZ^hkli^\b_b\`nb]Zg\^hg
]^m^kfbgbg`fhf^gmlZg]la^Zk_hk\^l' MablaZlZkbl^g[^\Znl^bmaZl
[^^g>nkhi^ZgikZ\mb\^mh`boîkbg\bie^lbgma^\h]^lZg]_hkma^]^mZbe^]
Ziieb\Zmbhgmh[îk^l^gm^]bghma^klhnk\^lln\aZlm^qm[hhdl'
<aZim^k*%hkb`bgZeerin[ebla^]ZlBgmkh]n\mbhgmh>nkh\h]^l%abàebàm^]ma^
d^r]b__^k^g\^l[^mp^^g>nkh\h]^+Zg];L1**)% bg\en]bg`m^kfbgheh`r'
Bmlahne][^ghm^]maZmoZen^l_khfma^NDGZmbhgZe:gg^q!G:"aZo^[^^g
nl^]makhnàhnm% bg\en]bgòZen^lmaZmZk^^f[^]]^]bg]^kbo^] _hkfneZ^
!]^kboZmbhgl\Zg[^_hng]Zmppp'^nkh\h]^+'bg_h"' :eblmh_lrf[hel kêZm^]
mh[^Zf]^lb`gbl`bo^gZmma^^g]h_mabl\aZim^k'
3
Design procedure
:ikh\^]nk^_hk\Zkkrbg`hnmma^]^mZbe^]]^lb`gh_[^ZflbllahpgbgMZ[e^*'
MablZllnf^lmaZmma^[^Zf]bf^glbhglaZoîkôbhnler[^^g]^m^kfbg^]
]nkbg`\hg\îmnZe]^lb`g' <hg\îm]^lb`glikîZk^]Zllnfbg`]^mZbe^]]^lb`g
phne][^mh;L1**)fZr[^\hgmbgn^]makhnàmh]^mZbe^]]^lb`gnlbg`
>nkh\h]^+' Fhk^]^mZbe^]Z]ob\^hg]^m^kfbgbg`]^lb`geb_^% Z\mbhgl% fZm^kbZe
ikhi^kmb^l% f^mah]lh_ZgZerlbl% fbgbfnf\hg\k^m^\ho^k_hk]nkZ[bebmrZg]
\hgmkheh_\kZ\dpb]mal\Zg[^_hng]bg<aZim^k+%hkb`bgZeerin[ebla^]Zl
@^mmbg`lmZkm^]
%Zg] in<aZim^k*'
Fire resistance
lu|ocode 2, la|t !2 Lmkn\mnkZe_bk^]^lb`g , g|ves a cho|ce o advanced,
s|m,|||ed o| ta|u|a| methods o| dete|m|n|ng the ||e |es|stance 0s|ng ta||es
|s the astest method o| dete|m|n|ng the m|n|mum d|mens|ons and cove|
o| |eams he|e a|e, howeve|, some |est||ct|ons and | these a,,|y u|the|
gu|dance on the advanced and s|m,|||ed methods can |e o|ta|ned |om
s,ec|a||st ||te|atu|e
kathe| than g|v|ng a m|n|mum cove|, the ta|u|a| method

|s |ased on nom|na| ax|s d|stance,
Z (see l|gu|e !) h|s |s the d|stance |om

the cent|e o the ma|n |e|no|c|ng |a| to the to, o| |ottom su|ace o the
<hgmbgn^liZ`^+0
Euro2-05_BeamsFinal.qxd 9/2/06 11:03 am Page 1
4. Beams
R Moss BSc, PhD, DIC, CEng, MICE, MIStructE O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
26 2
e c n a d i u g r e h t r u F k s a T p e t S
d r a d n a t S Chapter in this publication
! Lete|m|ne des|gn ||e 2@^mmbg`lmZkm^] NA to bS lN !990 a||e NA2!
2 Assess act|ons on the |eam 2 @^mmbg`lmZkm^] bS lN !99! (!0 ,a|ts) and Nat|ona| Annexes
3 Lete|m|ne wh|ch com||nat|ons o act|ons a,,|y !Bgmkh]n\mbhgmh>nkh\h]^l NA to bS lN !990 a||es NAA!! and NAA!2 (b)
4 Lete|m|ne |oad|ng a||angements 2@^mmbg`lmZkm^] NA to bS lN !992!!
S Assess du|a||||ty |equ||ements and dete|m|ne conc|ete st|ength 2@^mmbg`lmZkm^] bS SS00 2002
6 Chec| cove| |equ||ements o| a,,|o,||ate ||e |es|stance ,e||od 2@^mmbg`lmZkm^] and 'l||e |es|stance' A,,|oved Locument b bS lN !992!! Sect|on S
sect|on
/ Ca|cu|ate m|n cove| o| du|a||||ty, ||e and |ond |equ||ements 2@^mmbg`lmZkm^] bS lN !992!! C| 44!
S Ana|yse st|uctu|e to o|ta|n c||t|ca| moments and shea| o|ces 2@^mmbg`lmZkm^] and a||e 3 bS lN !992!! sect|on S
9 ! 6 n o | t c e s ! ! 2 9 9 ! N l S b n o | t c e s ' e | u x e | l ' e e S t n e m e c | o n | e | | a | u x e | n g | s e L
2 6 n o | t c e s ! ! 2 9 9 ! N l S b n o | t c e s ' | a e h s | a c | t | e V ' e e S y t | c a , a c | a e h s | c e h C 0 !
4 / n o | t c e s ! ! 2 9 9 ! N l S b n o | t c e s ' n o | t c e | e L ' e e S n o | t c e | e d | c e h C ! !
!2 Chec| s,ac|ng o |a|s 2@^mmbg`lmZkm^] bS lN !992!! sect|on /3
Note
NA Nat|ona| Annex
Table 1
Beam design procedure
Table 2
Minimum dimensions and axis distances for beams made with reinforced concrete for fire resistance
Figure 3
Simplified rectangular stress block for
concrete up to class C50/60 from Eurocode 2
d
h
x
Section
A
s2
A
s
Neutral axis
b
d
2
Strain
sc
0.8x
F
sc
f
cd
Stress block and forces
z
F
c
F
st
Figure 1
Section through structural member,
showing nominal axis distances a and a
sd
b
a
a
sd
h > b
Standard fire resistance Minimum dimensions (mm)
Possible combinations of a and b
min
where a is the average axis distance and b
min
is the width of the beam
Simply supported beams Continuous beams
A B C D E F G H
R60 b
min
= 120 160 200 300 120 200
a = 40 35 30 25 25 12
a
R90 b
min
= 150 200 300 400 150 250
a = 55 45 40 35 35 25
R120 b
min
= 200 240 300 500 200 300 450 500
a = 65 60 55 50 45 35 35 30
R240 b
min
= 280 350 500 700 280 500 650 700
a = 90 80 75 70 75 60 60 50
Notes
1 This table is taken from BS EN 199212 Tables 5.5 and 5.6.
2 The axis distance, a
sd
, from the side of the beam to the corner bar should be a +10 mm except where b
min
is greater than the values in columns C and F.
3 The table is valid only if the detailing requirements (see note 4) are observed and, in normal temperature design, redistribution of bending moments does not exceed 15%.
4 For fire resistance of R90 and above, for a distance of 0.3l
eff
from the centre line of each intermediate support, the area of top reinforcement should not be less than the following:
A
s,req
(x) = A
s,req
( 0)( 1 2.5( x/ l
eff
) )
where:
x is the distance of the section being considered from the centre line of the support.
A
s,req
( 0) is the area of reinforcement required for normal temperature design.
A
s,req
(x) is the minimum area of reinforcement required at the section being considered but not less than that required for normal temperature design.
l
eff
is the greater of the effective lengths of the two adjacent spans.
5 For fire resistances R120 R240, the width of the beam at the first intermediate support should be at least that in column F, if both the following conditions exist:
a there is no fixity at the end support; and
b the acting shear at normal temperature V
sd
> 0.67 V
Rd,max
.
Key
a Normally the requirements of BS EN 199211 will determine the cover.
26
273
4. Beams
Outside scope of this
publication
Carry out analysis of beam to determine
design moments (M) (see Table 3)
Obtain lever arm z from Table 5 or use
Calculate tension reinforcement
required from
Check minimum reinforcement
requirements (see Table 6)
Check maximum reinforcement requirements A
s, max
= 0.04 A
c
for tension or compression reinforcement outside lap locations
K = 0.60d 0.18d
2
0.21
where d 1.0
Compression reinforcement
required
START
Concrete class
C50/60?
Is K K ?
Yes
Yes
No
No
Determine K from K =
M
bd
2
f
ck
Calculate compression
reinforcement required from
where
Figure 2
Table 3
Bending moment and shear coefficients for beams
member. It is a nominal (not minimum) dimension, so the designer
should ensure that:
a c
nom
+ f
link
+ f
bar
/2 and a
sd
= a + 10 mm
Table 2 gives the minimum dimensions for beams to meet the
standard fire periods.
Flexure
The design procedure for flexural design is given in Figure 2; this includes
derived formulae based on the simplified rectangular stress block from
Eurocode 2. Table 3 may be used to determine bending moments and
shear forces for beams, provided the notes to the table are observed.
Table 4
Values for K
% redistribution d (redistribution ratio) K
) *')) )'+)1
Z
*) )'2) )'*1+
Z
*. )'1. )'*/1
+) )'1) )'*.,
,) )'0) )'*+)
+. )'0. )'*,0
Key
a Bmblh_m^gk^\hf^g]^]bgma^NDmaZm Dlahne][êbfbm^]mh)'*/1mh^glnk^]n\mbe^_Zbenk^'
K z/d
)'). )' 2.)
Z
)')/ )'2--
)')0 )'2,-
)')1 )'2+-
)')2 )'2*,
)'*) )'2)+
K z/d
)'** )'12*
)'*+ )'11)
)'*, )'1/1
)'*- )'1./
)'*. )'1-,
)'*/ )'1,)
)'*0 )'1*/
)'*1 )'1)+
)'*2 )'010
)'+) )'00*
Key
a Ebfbmbg`s mh)'2.] blghmZk^jnbk^f^gmh_>nkh\h]^+% [nmbl\hglb]^k^]mh[^`hh]ikZ\mb\^'
for singly reinforced rectangular sections
Table 6
Minimum percentage of required reinforcement
f
ck
f
ctm
Minimum percentage (0.26 f
ctm
/ f
yk
a
)
+. +'/ )'*,
+1 +'1 )'*-
,) +'2 )'*.
,+ ,') )'*/
,. ,'+ )'*0
-) ,'. )'*1
-. ,'1 )'+)
.) -'* )'+*
Key
a :llnfbg`_
rd
6 .))FIZ
Table 5
z/d
A
s2
=
(KK) f
ck
bd
2
f
sc
(dd
2
)
Calculate tension
reinforcement required from
1 + 1 3.53K z =
2
d
[ ]
1 + 1 3.53K 0.95d z =
2
d
[ ]
A
s, min
= where f
ck
25
f
yk
0.26 f
ctm
b
t
d
A
s
=
f
yd
z
M
A
s
= + A
s2
f
yd
z
Kf
ck
bd
2
f
yd
f
sc
f
sc
= 700 f
yd
x
x d
2
[ ]
Moment Shear
Outer support 25% of span moment 0.45 (G + Q)
G^Zkfb]]e^h_^g]liZg )')2)Gl + 0.100 Ql
At first interior support 0.094 (G + Q) l 0.63 (G + Q)
a
At middle of interior spans 0.066 Gl + 0.086 Ql
At interior supports 0.075 (G + Q) l 0.50 (G + Q)
Key
a 0.55 (G + Q) may be used adjacent to the interior span.
Notes
1 Redistribution of support moments by 15% has been included.
2 Applicable to 3 or more spans only and where Q
k
G
k
.
3 Minimum span 0.85 longest span.
4 l is the span, G is the total of the ULS permanent actions, Q is the total
of the ULS variable actions.
27
4. Beams
28 4
Figure 5
Procedure for determining vertical shear reinforcement
Determine v
Ed
where
v
Ed
= design shear stress v
Ed
= V
Ed
/(b
w
z) = V
Ed
/(0 . 9 b
w
d)] [
Yes (cot y = 2.5)
No No
START
Determine the concrete strut capacity v
Rd, max cot y = 2.5
fromTable 7
Redesign
section
Determine y from:
Calculate area of shear reinforcement:
Check maximum spacing for vertical shear reinforcement:
s
l, max
= 0.75 d
=
s
A
sw
y = 0.5 sin
-1
0.20 f
ck
(1 f
ck
/250)
v
Ed
T V
f
ywd
cot y
v
Ed
b
w
Is
v
Ed
< v
Rd, max coty = 2.5
?
Is
v
Ed
< v
Rd, max cot y = 1.0
?
(see Table 7)
Yes
Table 7
Minimum and maximum concrete strut capacity in terms of stress
f
ck
v
Rd,max cot y = 2.5
v
Rd,max cot y = 1.0
20 2.54 3.68
25 3.10 4.50
28 3.43 4.97
30 3.64 5.28
32 3.84 5.58
35 4.15 6.02
40 4.63 6.72
45 5.08 7.38
50 5.51 8.00
Figure 4
Strut inclination method
Longitudinal
reinforcement in tension
Vertical shear
reinforcement
Concrete strut in compression
y
presented here is the simplified rectangular stress block, which is
similar to that found in BS 8110 (see Figure 3).
Eurocode 2 gives recommendations for the design of concrete up to
class C90/105. However, for concrete greater than class C50/60, the
stress block is modified. It is important to note that concrete strength
is based on the cylinder strength and not the cube strength (i.e. for
class C30/37 the cylinder strength ( f
ck
) is 30 MPa, whereas the cube
strength is 37 MPa).
Vertical shear
Eurocode 2 introduces the strut inclination method for shear capacity
checks. In this method the shear is resisted by concrete struts acting in
compression and shear reinforcement acting in tension.
The angle of the concrete strut varies, depending on the shear force
applied (see Figure 4). The procedure for determining the shear capacity
of a section is shown in Figure 5 (which includes UK NA values) and is
in terms of shear stress in the vertical plane rather than a vertical force
as given in Eurocode 2. Where shear reinforcement is required, then
the angle of the concrete strut should be calculated. For many typical
beams the minimum angle of strut will apply (when cot y = 2.5 or y =
21.8) i.e. for class C30/37 concrete the strut angle exceeds 21.8 only
when the shear stress is greater than 3.27 N/mm
2
(refer to Table 7).
As with BS 8110, there is a maximum permitted shear capacity, v
Rd,max
,
(when cot y =1.0 or y = 45), but this is not restricted to 5 MPa as in
BS 8110.
Deflection
>nkh\h]^+aZlmphZem^kgZmbo^f^mah]l_hk\a^\dbg`]^_e^\mbhg%
^bma^kZebfbmbg`liZg&mh&]îmakZmbhfZr[^nl^]hkma^ma^hk^mb\Ze
]^_e^\mbhg\Zg[^Zll^ll^]nlbg`ma^^qik^llbhgl`bo^gbgma^<h]^'
MaêZmm^kbl]^Zempbmabg]^mZbebg<aZim^k1%hkb`bgZeerin[ebla^]Zl
=^_e^\mbhg\Ze\neZmbhgl7'
Ma^liZg&mh&]îmakZmbhllahne]^glnk^maZm]^_e^\mbhgblebfbm^]mh
liZg(+.)Zg]mablblmaîkh\^]nkîk^l^gm^]bg?b`nk^/'
Flanged beams
?eZg`^][^Zfl\Zg[^mk^Zm^]bgfn\ama^lZf^pZrZlbg;L1**)'
Ma^fZbg]b__^k^g\^l\hfiZk^]pbma;L1**)Zk^maZmma^Zll^llf^gm
h_ma^_eZg`^pb]mablfhk^lhiablmb\Zm^]!l^^?b`nk^l2Zg]*)"Zg]
maZm>nkh\h]^+\hgmZbglZ\a^\dmh\hg_bkfmaZmma^la^Zklmk^llZm
<hgmbgn^liZ`^,*
28
29
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
S
p
a
n

t
o

d
e
p
t
h

r
a
t
i
o

(
s,reqd
/bd)
l
/
d
)
0.40% 0.60% 0.80% 1.00% 1.20% 1.40% 1.60% 1.80% 2.00%
f
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
= 50
f = 45
f = 40
f = 35
f = 32
f = 30
f = 28
f = 25
f = 20
f
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
ck
= 50
f = 45
f = 40
f = 35
f = 32
f = 30
f = 28
f = 25
f = 20
Figure 7
Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios
Notes
1 h|s graph assumes s|mp|y supported span cond|t|on
(D !0)
D !S or |nter|or span cond|t|on
D !3 or end span cond|t|on
D 04 or cant||evers
2 Compress|on re|norcement, r', has |een ta|en as 0
3 Curves |ased on the o||ow|ng express|ons
where r < r
0
and
where r > r
0
!! 32 ! D
r
_
c|
r
0
!S
]
e
_
c|
r
r
0
| ( ) |
!! D
(
r r
')
_
c|
r
0
!S
]
e
!2
_
c|
r
0
r
'
| |
!S
5
4. Beams
Figure 6
Is basic l/d x K x F1 x F2 x F3 Actual l/d ?
Increase
A
s,prov
F3 = 310/s
s
Where s
s
s
s
may assumed to be 310 MPa (i.e. F3 = 1.0)
Note: A
s,prov
1.5 A
s,reqd
(UK National Annex)
Determine basic l/d and K from Figure 7
Check complete
F1 = 1 0.1 ((b
f
/b
w
) 1) 0.8
(b
f
w
is rib breadth)
Otherwise F1 = 1.0
Where the slab span exceeds 7 m and it supports
brittle partitions, F2 = 7/l
eff
1.0
Otherwise F2 = 1.0
No
Yes
START
The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that

it was the intention of the drafting committee that linear interpolation be used
and this is in line with current UK practice.
Figure 8
s
), calculate the ratio
G
k
/Q
k
, read up the graph to the appropriate curve and read across
to determine s
su
.
s
s
s
= s
su
A
s,req
A
s,prov
1
d
( ( ) )
Ratio G
k
/Q
k
U
n
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d

s
t
e
e
l

s
t
r
e
s
s
,

s
s
u
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
c
2
= 0.8, g
G
= 1.35
c
2

= 0.6, g
G

= 1.35
c
2
= 0.3, g
G

= 1.35
c
2

= 0.2, g
G

= 1.35
c
2

= 0.6, g
G

= 1.25
c
2
= 0.3, g
G

= 1.25
c
2
= 0.2, g
G

= 1.25
29
4. Beams
30 6
Figure 11
Procedure for determining flexural capacity of flanged beams
Figure 9
Definition of l
o
, for calculation of effective flange width
Figure 10
Effective flange width parameters
l
0
= 0.85 l
1
l
0
= 0.15 (l
1
+ l
2
)
l
1
l
3
l
2
l
0
= 0.7 l
2
l
0
= 0.15 l
2
+ l
3
b
1
b
1
b
2
b
2
b
w

b
eff

b
eff,2
b
b
eff,1

START
Is x 1.25h
f
?
Is K
f
K ?
Carry out analysis of beam to determine design
moments, M (see Table 3)
Neutral axis in
flange. Design
as rectangular
section (Figure 2)
and then check
longitudinal shear
(Figure 14)
Redesign section
Determine l
0
(see Figure 9) and b
eff
from:
b
eff
= (b
w
+ b
eff1
+ b
eff2
) where
b
eff1
= (0.2b
1
+ 0.1 l
0
) 0.2 l
0
b
1
b
eff2
= (0.2b
2
+ 0.1 l
0
) 0.2 l
0
b
2
Note: The flange width at the support will be
different from that at mid-span.
For symbols refer to Figures 9 and 10
K = 0.60d 0.18d
2
0.21 where d 1.0
Calculate depth to neutral axis x from:
x = 2.5 (d z)
Neutral axis in web
Calculate moment capacity of flange from:
M
R,f
= 0.57 f
ck
(b
eff
b
w
) h
f
(d 0.5h
f
)
Calculate area of reinforcement required from Check longitudinal
shear
(see Figure 14)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Determine K from K =
where b = b
w
at support
b = b
eff
in span
1 + 1 3.53K 0.95d z =
2
d
[ ]
bd
2
f
ck
M
A
s
= +
f
ywd
(d 0.5 h
f
)
M
R,f
f
ywd
M M
R,f
K
f
= and
f
ck
b
w
d
2
M M
R,f
Figure 12
Placing of tension reinforcement in flanged cross section
Figure 13
Notations for the connection between flange and web
A
A
F
d
F
d
S
f
b
eff
A
sf
h
f
F
d
+ F
d
D
F
d
+ F
d
D
Dx
b
w
y
f
Longitudinal bar
anchored beyond
this projected point
Compressive struts
b
eff
b
eff1
b
eff2
A
s
b
w
h
f
30
317
Figure 14
Procedure for determining longitudinal shear capacity of flanged beams
Yes
No No
No
Calculate the longitudinal shear stress
from: v
Ed
= DF
d
/(h
f
Dx)
(see Figure 13)
Determine the concrete strut capacity
fromTable 8 or from:
v
Rd
= 0.160 f
ck
(1 f
ck
/250)
Calculate area of transverse reinforcement from:
Yes (cot y
f
= 2.0) Yes (cot y
f
= 1.25)
Is v
RD
> v
Ed
? Is v
RD
> v
Ed
?
Is length of
flange under consideration
in tension?
Determine y
f
from:
Determine the concrete
strut capacity fromTable 8
or from:
v
Rd
= 0.195 f
ck
(1 f
ck
/250)
=
s
A
sf
y
f
=0.5sin
-1
0.2f
ck
(1 f
ck
/250)
v
Ed
T V
f
yd
cot y
f
v
Ed
h
f
Table 8
Concrete strut capacity for longitudinal shear in flanged beams
f
ck
v
Rd,max
Flange in compression Flange in tension
2 . ' , - 2 ' + ) +
2 , ' - ) / ' , . +
. 1 ' - 1 2 ' , 1 +
. * ' . + + ' - ) ,
- - ' . / - ' - + ,
0 1 ' . + 1 ' - . ,
. . ' / 1 , ' . ) -
) + ' 0 ) 2 ' . . -
) 1 ' 0 ) - ' / ) .
Minimum area of shear reinforcement
Ma^fbgbfnfZk^Zh_la^Zkk^bg_hk\^f^gmbg[^Zfl%:lp%fbglahne]
[^\Ze\neZm^]_khf
pa^k^
r
p%fbg
\Zg[^h[mZbg^]_khfMZ[e^2'
:
lp
l[
p
4 r
p%fbg
the |nte|ace o the |ange and we| can |e |es|sted |y the t|ansve|se
|e|no|cement |n the |ange he ,os|t|on o the neut|a| ax|s shou|d
|e dete|m|ned, and then the a|ea o |e|no|cement can |e ca|cu|ated
de,end|ng whethe| |t ||es |n the |ange o| we| (see l|gu|e !!)
At su,,o|ts the tens|on |e|no|cement to |es|st hogg|ng moments
shou|d |e d|st|||uted ac|oss the u|| w|dth o the eect|ve |ange as
shown |n l|gu|e !2 he s,an-to-de,th de|ect|on chec|s us|ng |at|o o
tens|on |e|no|cement shou|d |e |ased on a|ea o conc|ete a|ove
cent|e o tens|on stee|
Longitudinal shear
he shea| st|ess |n the ve|t|ca| ,|ane |etween the |ange and we| shou|d
|e assessed acco|d|ng to sect|on 624 and l|gu|e 6/ o the lu|ocode
(|e,|oduced he|e as l|gu|e !3) he change |n o|ce |n the |ange can
|e assessed |om the moment and |eve| a|m at a ,a|t|cu|a| |ocat|on
he lu|ocode states that the max|mum |ength that can |e cons|de|ed
o| the change |n o|ce |s ha| the d|stance |etween the max|mum
moment and the ,o|nt whe|e the moment |s .e|o C|ea||y, the max|mum
|ong|tud|na| o|ce w||| occu| whe|e the change |n moment, and
the|eo|e o|ce, |s the g|eatest, o| a un|o|m|y d|st|||uted |oad on a
cont|nuous |eam th|s w||| |e the |ength o |eam c|osest to the su,,o|t
l|gu|e !4 shows a |ow cha|t o| assess|ng the |ong|tud|na| shea|
ca,ac|ty, |n many cases the t|ansve|se |e|no|cement |n the s|a| w||| |e
su|c|ent to |es|st the shea| o|ce h|s chec| |s |nc|uded to ensu|e that
whe|e ,a|t|cu|a||y th|n |anges a|e used the|e |s adequate |e|no|cement
he |ong|tud|na| shea| ca,ac|ty |s |ased on the va||a||e st|ut |nc||nat|on
method, wh|ch was desc|||ed |n the sect|on on ve|t|ca| shea|
Minimum area of longitudinal reinforcement
he m|n|mum a|ea o |e|no|cement |s :
s, m|n
026 _
c tm
[
t
]/_
y |
|ut
not |ess than 000!3[
t
], whe|e [
t
|s the mean w|dth o the tens|on
.one (see a||e 6) lo| a -|eam w|th the |ange |n com,|ess|on, on|y
the w|dth o the we| |s ta|en |nto account |n ca|cu|at|ng the va|ue o [
Maximum area of longitudinal reinforcement
he max|mum a|ea o tens|on o| com,|ess|on |e|no|cement, outs|de
|a, |ocat|ons shou|d not exceed :
s, max
004 :
c
he m|n|mum c|ea| d|stance |etween |a|s shou|d |e the g|eate| o
ba| d|amete|
Agg|egate s|.e ,|us S mm
20 mm
4. Beams
Table 9
Values for r
w,min
f
ck 20 25 28 30 32 35 40 45 50
r
p%fbg
q*)
&,
)'0+ )'1) )'1. )'11 )'2* )'2. *')* *')0 *'*,
31
4. Beams
32
4. Beams
References
1 bkllSl SANLAkLS lNSl0lON bS lN !992!!, lu|ocode 2 /e/q o| coce|e |ac|ae - /a| '-' Oeea/ a/e aJ a/e |o
/a//J/q bSl, 2004
2 bkllSl SANLAkLS lNSl0lON bS S!!0! I/e |ac|aa/ ae o| coce|e - /a| ' CoJe o| oac|/ce |o Je/q aJ co|ac|/o bSl, !99/
3 NAkAANAN, k S 8 bkOOllk, O /ou |o Je/q coce|e |ac|ae a/q /aocoJe ? /|oJac|/o |o /aocoJe he Conc|ete Cent|e, 200S
4 bkOOllk, O /ou |o Je/q coce|e |ac|ae a/q /aocoJe ? Oe||/q |a|eJ he Conc|ete Cent|e, 200S
5 bkllSl SANLAkLS lNSl0lON bS lN !992!2, lu|ocode 2 /e/q o| coce|e |ac|ae Oeea/ a/e - |ac|aa/ |/e Je/q bSl, 2004
7 vlbSlk, k 8 bkOOllk, O /ou |o Je/q coce|e |ac|ae a/q /aocoJe ? /e|/ec|/o ca/ca/a|/o he Conc|ete Cent|e, 2006
6 LllAkMlN Ol COMM0NlllS ANL lOCAl COVlkNMlN /aJ/oo/ |o //-'99?-'-? LClC, due 2006
s
/
to |es|st the moment due to the des|gn
|oads (o| at su,,o|t o| cant||eve|s)
r' kequ||ed com,|ess|on |e|no|cement at /
s2
//J
m|d-s,an to |es|st the moment due to the
des|gn |oads (o| at su,,o|t o| cant||eve|s)
(|om a||e 3!, lu|ocode 2)
/
l|ange th|c|ness
/ lacto| to ta|e account o the d|e|ent See ta||e NA4 |n
x e n n A | a n o | t a N l 0 s m e t s y s | a | u t c u | t s
/
e
lect|ve s,an o mem|e| See Sect|on S322 (!)
/
o
L|stance |etween ,o|nts o .e|o moment
//J S,an-to-de,th |at|o
/ Les|gn moment at the 0lS
\ ( s | x a | a | t u e n o t h t , e L J-)/04
\
max
l|m|t|ng va|ue o| de,th to neut|a| ax|s (d 04)J whe|e d <!0
leve| a|m
a
cc
Coe|c|ent ta||ng account o |ong te|m 0SS o| |exu|e and
eects on com,|ess|ve st|ength and o ax|a| |oads
unavou|a||e eects |esu|t|ng |om the !0 o| othe| ,henomena
wa ) x e n n A | a n o | t a N l 0 m o | l ( d e | | , , a s | d a o | y
d kat|o o the |ed|st|||uted moment to the
e|ast|c |end|ng moment
g
m
la|t|a| acto| o| mate||a| ,|o,e|t|es !!S o| |e|no|cement (g
s
)
!S o| conc|ete (g
c
)
r
0
kee|ence |e|no|cement |at|o R|
c|
/!000
r kequ||ed tens|on |e|no|cement at m|d-s,an / /J (o| |ectangu|a| |eams)
/
c
C|oss sect|ona| a|ea o conc|ete
/
s
A|ea o tens|on stee|
/
s2
A|ea o com,|ess|on stee|
/
s, ,|ov
A|ea o tens|on stee| ,|ov|ded
/
s, |eq'd
A|ea o tens|on stee| |equ||ed
/
e
lect|ve |ange w|dth
/
t
Mean w|dth o the tens|on .one
/
m|n
v|dth o |eam o| |||
/
w
v|dth o sect|on, o| w|dth o we| on |anged |eams
J lect|ve de,th
J
2
lect|ve de,th to com,|ess|on |e|no|cement
|
cd
Les|gn va|ue o conc|ete com,|ess|ve st|ength a
cc
|
c|
/g
c
o| |
c|
< CS0/60
|
c|
Cha|acte||st|c cy||nde| st|ength o conc|ete
|
ctm
Mean va|ue o ax|a| tens||e st|ength 030 |
c|
(2/3)
o| |
c|
< CS0/60
S e u l a V n o i t i n i f e D l o b m y Sy e u l a V n o i t i n i f e D l o b m
Selected symbols
32
4. Beams
Ref: TCC/03/19
ISBN 1-904818-29-3
First published February 2006, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
Acknowledgements
This chapter is intended to assist engineers with the design of columns and
walls to Eurocode 2
1
. It sets out a design procedure to follow and gives useful
commentary on the provisions within the Eurocode. The layout and content
of Eurocode 2 may appear unusual to designers familiar with BS 8110
2
.
Eurocode 2 does not contain the derived formulae; this is because it has been
European practice to give principles and general application rules in the codes
and for detailed application rules to be presented in other sources such as
textbooks or guidance documents.
3
, highlighted the
It should also be noted that values from the UK National Annex (NA) have
been used throughout this publication, including values that are embedded in
derived formulae. (Derivations can be found at www.eurocode2.info.) A full list
of symbols related to column design is given at the end of this chapter.
Design procedure
A procedure for carrying out the detailed design of braced columns (i.e.
columns that do not contribute to resistance of horizontal actions) is shown
in Table 1. This assumes that the column dimensions have previously been
determined during conceptual design or by using quick design methods, for
example those presented in Economic concrete frame elements
4
. Column sizes
should not be significantly different from those obtained using BS 8110. Steps
1 to 4 of Table 1 are covered by earlier chapters and the next step is therefore
to consider fire resistance.
Fire resistance
5
, gives a choice of advanced, simplified
or tabular methods for determining fire resistance of columns. Using tables is the
fastest method for determining the minimum dimensions and cover for columns.
There are, however, some restrictions and if these apply further guidance can
be obtained from specialist literature.
6
The simplified method may give more
economic columns, especially for small columns and/or high fire resistance periods.
Rather than giving a minimum cover, the tabular method is based on nominal
axis distance, a (see Figure 1). This is the distance from the centre of the main
5. Columns
Continues page 35
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
34
Table 1
Column design procedure
Chapter in the publication Standard
1 Determine design life 2: Getting started UK NA to BS EN 1990 Table NA.2.1
2 Assess actions on the column 2: Getting started BS EN 1991 (10 parts) and UK National Annexes
3 Determine which combinations of actions apply 1: Introduction to Eurocodes UK NA to BS EN 1990 Tables NA.A1.1 and NA.A1.2 (B)
5 Check cover requirements for appropriate fire resistance period 2: Getting started and Table 2 Approved Document B. BS EN 199212
6 Calculate min. cover for durability, fire and bond requirements 2: Getting started BS EN 199211 Cl. 4.4.1
7 Analyse structure to obtain critical moments and axial
forces
2: Getting started and Structural
analysis section
BS EN 199211 section 5
8 Check slenderness See Figures 2 and 3 BS EN 199211 section 5.8
9 Determine area of reinforcement required See Figures 2 and 3 BS EN 199211 section 6.1
10 Check spacing of bars Rules for spacing section BS EN 199211 sections 8 and 9
Note
NA = National Annex.
Table 2
Minimum column dimensions and axis distances for fire resistance
Standard fire
resistance
Minimum dimensions (mm)
Column width b
min
/axis distance, a, of the main
bars
Column exposed on more than
one side
Column
exposed on
one side
(
fi
= 0.7)
fi
= 0.5
fi
= 0.7
R 60 200/36
300/31
250/46
350/40
155/25
R 90 300/45
400/38
a
350/53
450/40
a
155/25
R 120 350/45
a
450/40
a
350/57
a
450/51
a
175/35
R 240 450/75
a b
295/70
Note
The table is taken from BS EN 199212 Table 5.2a (method A) and is valid under the
following conditions:
1 The effective length of a braced column under fire conditions lo,fi 3m. The value of lo,fi
may be taken as 50% of the actual length for intermediate floors and between 50%
and 70% of the actual length for the upper floor column.
2 The first order eccentricity under fire conditions should be 0.15b (or h). Alternatively
use method B (see Eurocode 2, Part 12, Table 5.2b). The eccentricity under fire
conditions may be taken as that used in normal temperature design.
3 The reinforcement area outside lap locations does not exceed 4% of the concrete
cross section.
4 fi is the ratio of the design axial load under fire conditions to the design resistance of
the column at normal temperature conditions. fi may conservatively be taken as 0.7.
Key
a Minimum 8 bars
b Method B may be used which indicates 600/70 for R 240 and
fi
= 0.7.
See BS EN 199212 Table 5.2b
Table 3
Minimum reinforced concrete wall dimensions and axis distances for
load-bearing for fire resistance
Standard
fire
resistance
Minimum dimensions (mm)
Wall thickness/axis distance, a, of the main bars
Wall exposed on one side
(
fi
= 0.7)
Wall exposed on two
sides (
fi
= 0.7)
REI 60 130/10
a
140/10
a
REI 90 140/25 170/25
REI 120 160/35 220/35
REI 240 270/60 350/60
Notes
1 The table is taken from BS EN 199212 Table 5.4.
2 See note 4 of Table 2.
Key
Figure 1
Section through structural member, showing nominal axis distance a
h b
a
b
35
5. Columns
present methods A and B. Both are equally applicable, although
method A has smaller limits on eccentricity than method B. Method A
is slightly simpler and is presented in Table 2; limits of applicability
are given in the notes. Similar data for load-bearing walls is given in
Table 3.
For columns supporting the uppermost storey, the eccentricity will
often exceed the limits for both methods A and B. In this situation
Annex C of Eurocode 2, Part 12 may be used. Alternatively,
consideration can be given to treating the column as a beam for
determining the design fire resistance.
Column design
A flow chart for the design of braced columns is shown in Figure 2. For
slender columns, Figure 3 will also be required.
Structural analysis
The type of analysis should be appropriate to the problem being
considered. The following may be used: linear elastic analysis, linear
elastic analysis with limited redistribution, plastic analysis and
non-linear analysis. Linear elastic analysis may be carried out assuming
cross sections are uncracked (i.e. concrete section properties),
using linear stress-strain relationships and assuming mean values
of long-term elastic modulus.
For the design of columns the elastic moments from the frame action
should be used without any redistribution. For slender columns a
non-linear analysis may be carried out to determine the second order
moments; alternatively use the moment magnification method
(Cl 5.8.7.3) or nominal curvature method (Cl 5.8.8) as illustrated in
Figure 3. The latter is expected to be adopted in the UK.
Design moments
The design bending moment is illustrated in Figure 4 and defined as:
M
Ed
= Max {M
02
, M
0e
+ M
2
, M
01
+ 0.5 M
2
}
where
M
01
= Min {|M
top
|, |M
bottom
|} + e
i
N
Ed
M
02
= Max {|M
top
|, |M
bottom
|} + e
i
N
Ed
e
i
= Max {l
o
/400, h/30, 20} (units to be in millimetres).
M
top
, M
bottom
= Moments at the top and bottom of the column
M
0e
= 0.6 M
02
+ 0.4 M
01
0.4 M
02
M
2
= N
Ed
e
2
where N
Ed
is the design axial load and e
2

is deflection due to second order effects
M
01
and M
02
should be positive if they give tension on the same side.
A non-slender column can be designed ignoring second order effects
and therefore the ultimate design moment, M
Ed
= M
02
.
The calculation of the eccentricity, e
2
, is not simple and is likely to
require some iteration to determine the deflection at approximately
mid-height, e
2
. Guidance is given in Figure 3.
Figure 2
Flow chart for braced column design
Use column chart (see Figure 9) to fnd A
s
required for N
Ed

and M
Ed.
Alternatively, solve by iteration or by using RC
Spreadsheet TCC53 from Spreadsheets for concrete design to
BS 8110 and Eurocode 2
7
START
Initial column size may be determined using quick design
methods or through iteration.
Determine the actions on the column
using an appropriate analysis method.
The ultimate axial load is N
Ed
and the ultimate moments
are M
top
and M
bottom
(Moments from analysis)
Determine the effective length, l
o
, using either:
1. Figure 5
2. Table 4
3. Expression (5.15) from BS EN 199211
Determine frst order moments (see Figure 4)
M
01
= Min {|M
top
|, |M
bottom
|} + e
i
N
Ed
M
02
= Max {|M
top
|, |M
bottom
|} + e
i
N
Ed
Where e
i
= Max {l
o
/400, h/30, 20} (units to be in millimetres).
M
01
and M
02
should have the same sign
if they give tension on the same side.
Determine slenderness, l, from either:
l = l
o
/i where i = radius of gyration or
l = 3.46 l
o
/h for rectangular sections (h = overall depth) or
l = 4.0 l
o
/d for circular sections (d = column diameter)
Determine slenderness limit,
lim
, from:
l
lim =
15.4C
n

(See Slenderness section on page 5 for explanation.)
Column is slender
(refer to Figure 3).
Yes
Column is not slender. M
Ed
= M
02
No
Check rules for spacing and quantity of reinforcement
(see page 7)
Is l l
lim
?
reinforcing bar to the surface of the member. It is a nominal (not
minimum) dimension, and the designer should ensure that:
a c
nom
+ f
link
+ f
bar
/2.
For columns there are two tables given in Eurocode 2 Part 12 that
36
Figure 3
Flow chart for slender columns (nominal curvature method)
Effective length
Figure 5 gives guidance on the effective length of the column.
However, for most real structures Figures 5f) and 5g) only are
applicable, and Eurocode 2 provides two expressions to calculate the
effective length for these situations. Expression (5.15) is for braced
members and Expression (5.16) is for unbraced members.
In both expressions, the relative flexibilities at either end, k
1
and k
2
,
should be calculated. The expression for k given in the Eurocode
involves calculating the rotation of the restraining members, which in
practice requires the use of framework analysis software. Alternatively,
PD 6687: Background paper to the UK National annex
8
provides a
simplification, based on the stiffness of the beams attached to either
side of the column. This relative stiffness, k, can therefore be calculated
as follows (provided the stiffness of adjacent columns does not vary by
more than 15% of the higher stiffness):
k =
EI
c

2EI
b
0.1
l
c
l
b
where
I
c
, I
b
are the column and beam uncracked second moments of area
l
c
, l
b
are the column and beam lengths
Once k
1
and k
2
have been calculated, the effective length factor, F, can
be established from Table 4 for braced columns. The effective length is
then l
o
= Fl.
For a 400 mm square internal column supporting a 250 mm thick flat
slab on a 7.5 m grid, the value of k could be 0.11, and therefore l
o
= 0.59l.
In the edge condition k is effectively doubled and l
o
= 0.67l. If the internal
column had a notionally pinned support at its base then l
o
= 0.77l.
It is also generally accepted that Table 3.19 of BS 8110 may
conservatively be used to determine the effective length factor. In the
long term, Expressions (5.15) and (5.16) will be beneficial as they are
particularly suitable for incorporation into design software.
From Figure 2
Determine K
r
from Figure 9 or from
K
r
= (n
u
- n) / (n
u
- n
bal
) 1
where
n = N
Ed
/ (A
c
f
cd
), relative axial force
N
Ed
= the design value of axial force
n
u
= 1 + w
n
bal
= 0.4
w = A
s,est
f
yd
/ (A
c
f
cd
)
A
s,est
= the estimated total area of steel
A
c
= the area of concrete
Revise value
of A
s,est
No
Yes
Check detailing requirements
Calculate Kh from Kh = 1 + b h
ef
1
where
h
ef
= the effective creep ratio
b = 0.35 + f
ck
/200 /150
l = the slenderness ratio.
See section on creep (page 6)
Calculate e
2
from

e
2 = 0.1
(
K
r
Kh f
yd
)

l0
2
0.45d Es

where
Es = elastic modulus of reinforcing steel
(200 GPa)
M
0e
= 0.6 M
02
+ 0.4 M
01
0.4 M
02
M
2
= N
Ed
e
2
M
Ed
= Max {M
02
, M
0e
+ M
2
, M
01
+ 0.5 M
2
}
Use column chart to fnd A
s,reqd
for N
Ed
and M
Ed
Alternatively, solve by iteration or by using
RC Spreadsheet
7
Figure 5
Effective lengths for isolated members
a) l
0
= l b) l
0
= 2l c) l
0
= 0.7l d) l
0
= l /2 e) l
0
= l f) l/2 < l
0
< l g) l
0
> 2l
y
l
y
y
M
File How to Columns Fig 5
25.01.06
Job No.
Figure 5
Effective lengths for isolated members
First order
moments for
stocky columns
M
02
M
01
M
02
0.5 M
2
M M
01 2
+ 0.5
2 Ed 2
M M
0e 2
+ M
0e
Additional second
order moments for
slender columns
Total moment
diagram for
slender columns
+ =
M
e N
i Ed
File How t o Columns Figure 4
25.01.06
Job No.
Figure 4
Design moments
M N = e
Figure 4
Design bending moments
Is A
s reqd
& A
s, est
?
37
5. Columns
Table 4
Effective length factor, F, for braced columns
k2 k1
0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.70 1.00 2.00 5.00 9.00 Pinned
0.10 0.59 0.62 0.64 0.66 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.76 0.77
0.20 0.62 0.65 0.68 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.74 0.77 0.79 0.80 0.81
0.30 0.64 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 0.84
0.40 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.74 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.82 0.84 0.85 0.86
0.50 0.67 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.83 0.86 0.86 0.87
0.70 0.69 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.88 0.89 0.90
1.00 0.71 0.74 0.77 0.79 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.88 0.90 0.91 0.92
2.00 0.73 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.91 0.93 0.94 0.95
5.00 0.75 0.79 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.90 0.93 0.96 0.97 0.98
9.00 0.76 0.80 0.83 0.85 0.86 0.89 0.91 0.94 0.97 0.98 0.99
Pinned 0.77 0.81 0.84 0.86 0.87 0.90 0.92 0.95 0.98 0.99 1.00
105 kNm
105 kNm 105 kNm
105 kNm 105 kNm
r
m
= 1.0 r
m
= -1.0 r
m
= 0
a) C = 1.7 - 1 = 0.7 b) C = 1.7 - 0 = 1.7 c) C = 1.7 + 1.0 = 2.7
Figure 6
Calculating Factor C
0
Note
For unbraced columns, C = 0.7
File How t o Columns Figure 6
25.01.06
Job No.
Figure 6
Calculating factor C
Slenderness
Eurocode 2 states that second order effects may be ignored if they
are less than 10% of the first order effects. As an alternative, if the
slenderness (l) is less than the slenderness limit (l
lim
), then second
order effects may be ignored.
Slenderness, l = l
o
/i where i = radius of gyration and slenderness limit.
l
lim
=
20ABC

15.4C

n n
where
A = 1/(1+0.2 h
ef
) (if h
ef
is not known, A = 0.7 may be used)
B = (if , reinforcement ratio, is not known,
B = 1.1 may be used)
C = 1.7 r
m
(if r
m
is not known, C = 0.7 may be used see below)
n = N
Ed
/ (A
c
f
cd
)
r
m
= M
01
/M
02
M
01
, M
02
are the first order end moments, |M
02
| |M
01
|
If the end moments M
01
and M
02
give tension on the same side,
r
m
should be taken positive.
Of the three factors A, B and C, C will have the largest impact on
l
lim
and is the simplest to calculate. An initial assessment of l
lim
can
therefore be made using the default values for A and B, but including
a calculation for C (see Figure 6). Care should be taken in determining
C because the sign of the moments makes a significant difference. For
unbraced members C should always be taken as 0.7.
Column design resistance
For practical purposes the rectangular stress block used for the design
of beams (see Chapter 4, originally published as Beams
9
) may also be
used for the design of columns (see Figure 7). However, the maximum
compressive strain for concrete classes up to and including C50/60,
when the whole section is in pure compression, is 0.00175 (see Figure
8a). When the neutral axis falls outside the section (Figure 8b), the
maximum allowable strain is assumed to lie between 0.00175 and
0.0035, and may be obtained by drawing a line from the point of zero
strain through the hinge point of 0.00175 strain at mid-depth of the
section. When the neutral axis lies within the section depth then the
maximum compressive strain is 0.0035 (see Figure 8c).
File How to columns Fig 7
25.01.06
Job No.
Figure 7
Strain diagrams for columns
0.00175
h
x
x x
hinge
point
hinge
point
0.00175 / ( /2) x x h
h
d
h/ 2
0.0035 max 0.0035 max
0.00175 mi n
d) General relationship c) When x < h b) When x > h a) Pure compression
0.00175
e
x
e
x
Figure 8
Strain diagrams for columns
File Hoe to Columns Figure 8
25.01.06
Job No.
a) Strain diagram b) Stress diagram
Figure 8
Stress block diagram for columns
h
d
c
s
sc
e
cu2
e
sc
e
y
d
2
s
st
n. axis
d
2
x
f
cd
A
s2
A
s
Figure 7
Stress block diagram for columns
38
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
A f bhf
s yk ck
/
M/bh f
2
ck
N
b
h
f
/
c
k
K
r
= 0.2
d h
2
/ = 0.05
Figure 9a
Column design chart for rectangular columns d
2
/h = 0.05
The general relationship is shown in Figure 8d). For concrete classes
above C50/60 the principles are the same but the maximum strain
values vary.
Two expressions can be derived for the area of steel required, (based on
a rectangular stress block, see Figure 7) one for the axial loads and the
other for the moments:
A
sN
/2 = (N
Ed
f
cd
b d
c
) / (
sc

st
)
where
A
sN
= Area of reinforcement required to resist axial load
N
Ed
= Axial load
f
cd
= Design value of concrete compressive strength

sc
(
st
) = Stress in compression (and tension) reinforcement
b = Breadth of section
d
c
= Effective depth of concrete in compression = lx h
l = 0.8 for C50/60
x = Depth to neutral axis
h = Height of section
A
sM
/2 = [M f
cd
b d
c
(h/2 d
c
/2)] / [(h/2d
2
) (
sc
+
st
)]
where
A
sM
= Total area of reinforcement required to resist moment
Realistically, these can only be solved iteratively and therefore either
computer software (e.g. RC Spreadsheet TCC53 from Spreadsheets for
concrete design to BS 8110 and EC2
7
) or column design charts (see
Figures 9a to 9e) may be used.
Creep
Depending on the assumptions used in the design, it may be necessary
to determine the effective creep ratio h
ef
(ref. Cl. 3.1.4 & 5.8.4). A
nomogram is provided in the Eurocode (Figure 3.1) for which the
cement strength class is required; however, at the design stage it often
not certain which class applies. Generally, Class R should be assumed.
Where the ground granulated blastfurnace slag (ggbs) exceeds 35%
of the cement combination or where pulverized fuel ash (pfa) exceeds
20% of the cement combination, Class N may be assumed. Where
ggbs exceeds 65% or where pfa exceeds 35%, Class S may be assumed.
Biaxial bending
The effects of biaxial bending may be checked using Expression (5.39),
which was first developed by Breslaer.
(

M
Edz

)
a
+
(

M
Edy

)
a
1.0
M
Rdz
M
Rdy
where
M
Edz,y
= Design moment in the respective direction including second
order effects in a slender column
M
Rdz,y
= Moment of resistance in the respective direction
a = 2 for circular and elliptical sections; refer to Table 5 for rectangular
sections
N
Rd
= A
c
f
cd
+ A
s
f
yd
Continues page 41
39
5. Columns
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.0
d h
2
/ = 0.15
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
A f bhf
s yk ck
/
N
b
h
f
/
c
k
M bh f /
2
ck
K
r
=1
0.6
0.8
Figure 9c
2
/h = 0.15
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
M bh f /
2
ck
d h
2
/ = 0.10
K
r
=1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
N
b
h
f
/
c
k
A f bhf
s yk
/
ck
Figure 9b
2
/h = 0.10
40
A f bhf
s yk ck
/
d h
2
/ = 0.25
M/bh f
2
ck
N
b
h
f
/
c
k
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
K
r
= 1
Figure 9e
2
/h = 0.25
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
A f bhf
s yk ck
/
d h
2
/ = 0.20
M/bh f
2
ck
N
b
h
f
/
c
k
K
r
= 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Figure 9d
2
/h = 0.20
41
Table 5
Value of a for rectangular sections
N
Ed
/N
Rd
0.1 0.7 1.0
a 1.0 1.5 2.0
Note
Linear interpolation may be used.
Unbraced columns
There is no comment made on the design of sway frames in Eurocode 2.
However, it gives guidance on the effective length of an unbraced
member in Expression (5.16). The value for C of 0.7 should always be
used in Expression (5.13N). The design moments should be assessed
including second order effects. The tabular method for fire resistance
design (Part 12) does not explicitly cover unbraced columns; however
reference can be made to the Handbook to EN 199212
6
.
Walls
When the section length of a vertical element is four times greater
than its thickness it is defined as a wall. The design of walls does not
differ significantly from that for columns except for the following:
The requirements for fire resistance (see Table 3).
Bending will be critical about the weak axis.
There are different rules for spacing and quantity of reinforcement
(see below).
There is no specific guidance given for bending about the strong axis
for stability. However, the principles of CIRIA Report 108
10
may be
followed. Alternatively the strut and tie method may be used (section
6.5 of the Eurocode).
Maximum areas of reinforcement
In Eurocode 2 the maximum nominal reinforcement area for columns
and walls outside laps is 4% compared with 6% in BS 8110. However,
this area can be increased provided that the concrete can be placed
and compacted sufficiently. If required self-compacting concrete may
be used for particularly congested situations, where the reinforcing bars
should be spaced to ensure that the concrete can flow around them.
Further guidance can be found in Self-compacting concrete.
11
Minimum reinforcement requirements
The recommended minimum diameter of longitudinal reinforcement in
columns is 12 mm. The minimum area of longitudinal reinforcement in
columns is given by: A
s,min
= 0.10 N
Ed
/f
yd
0.002A
c
Exp. (9.12N)
The diameter of the transverse reinforcement should not be less than
6 mm or one quarter of the maximum diameter of the longitudinal bars.
1/r
0
Reference curvature
yd
/(0.45 d)
1/r Curvature K
r
Kh 1/r
0
a Axis distance for fire resistance
A Factor for determining slenderness limit 1 / (1+0.2 h
ef
)
A
c
A
s
Area of total column reinforcement
B Factor for determining slenderness limit
c Factor depending on curvature distribution 10 (for constant cross-section)
C Factor for determining slenderness limit 1.7 r
m

d Effective depth
e
2
Second order eccentricity (1/r)l
o
/c
e
i
Eccentricity due to geometric imperfections
E
s
Elastic modulus of reinforcing steel 200 GPa
f
cd
Design value of concrete compressive strength
cc
f
ck
/c
f
ck
l Clear height of compression member between
end restraints
l
o
Effective length
K
r
Correction factor depending on axial load
Kh Factor taking into account creep
M
01
,M
02
First order moments including the effect of
geometric imperfections |M
02
| |M
01
|
M
2
Nominal second order moment N
Ed
e
2
M
0e
Equivalent first order moment 0.6 M
02
+ 0.4 M
01
0.4 M
02
M
Ed
Ultimate design moment
M
Eqp
First order bending moment under
quasi-permanent loading
n Relative axial force N
Ed
/(A
c
f
cd
)
n
bal
Value of n at maximum moment of resistance 0.4
n
u
Factor to allow for reinforcement in the column 1 +
N
Ed
Ultimate axial load
r
m
Moment ratio M
01
/M
02
z Lever arm
cc
Coefficient taking account of long term effects 0.85 for flexure and axial
on compressive strength and of unfavourable loads. 1.0 for other
effects resulting from the way load is applied phenomena (From UK NA)
Factor 0.35 + f
ck
/200 /150
yd
Design value of strain in reinforcement f
yd
/E
s
m
Partial factor for material properties 1.15 for reinforcement (
s
)
1.5 for concrete (
c
)
l Slenderness l
o
/i
l
lim
Slenderness limit
fi
Degree of utilisation in a fire N
Ed,fi
/N
Rd
h
ef
Effective creep ratio h(
,t
o
) M
Eqp
/M
Ed
h (
,t
o
) Final creep co-efficient to Cl 3.1.4
Mechanical reinforcement ratio A
s
f
yd
/(A
c
f
cd
)
|x| Absolute value of x
Max. {x,y+z} The maximum of values x or y + z
Selected symbols
5. Columns
42
5. Columns
References
2 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 81101, Structural use of concrete Part 1, Code of practice for design and construction. BSI, 2004.
3 NARAYANAN, R S & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Introduction. The Concrete Centre, 2005.
4 GOODCHILD, C H. Economic concrete frame elements. BCA 1997.
5 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199212. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules structural fire design. BSI, 2004.
6 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Handbook to EN 199212. DCLG, due 2006.
7 GOODCHILD, C H WEBSTER, R M. Spreadsheets for concrete design to BS 8110 and Eurocode 2, version 3. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
8 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. Background paper to the UK National Annex to BS EN 199211 and BS EN 199212. BSI, due 2006.
10 CIRIA. Report 102: Design of shear wall buildings. CIRIA, 1984.
11 THE CONCRETE SOCIETY. Technical Report No 62: Self-compacting concrete. A review. The Society, 2005.
Spacing requirements for columns
The maximum spacing of transverse reinforcement (i.e. links) in
columns (Clause 9.5.3(1)) should not exceed:
12 times the minimum diameter of the longitudinal bars.
60% of the lesser dimension of the column.
240 mm.
At a distance greater than the larger dimension of the column above
or below a beam or slab these spacings can be increased by a factor
of 1.67. The minimum clear distance between the bars should be the
greater of the bar diameter, aggregate size plus 5 mm or 20 mm.
No longitudinal bar should be further than 150 mm from transverse
reinforcement (links) in the compression zone.
Particular requirements for walls
The minimum area of vertical reinforcement in walls is given by:
A
s,min
= 0.002A
c
Half of this area should be located at each face. The distance between
two adjacent vertical bars should not exceed the lesser of either three
times the wall thickness or 400 mm.
The minimum area of horizontal reinforcement in walls is the greater
of either 25% of vertical reinforcement or 0.001 A
c
. However, where
crack control is important, early age thermal and shrinkage effects
should be considered explicitly.
Ref: TCC/03/20
ISBN 1-904818-30-7
First published March 2006, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
Acknowledgements
Eurocode 2 Column Design Charts

Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design
Scope
All foundations should be designed so that the soil safely resists the
actions applied to the structure. The design of any foundation consists of
two components; the geotechnical design and the structural design of the
foundation itself. However, for some foundations (e.g. flexible rafts) the effect
of the interaction between the soil and structure may be critical and must
also be considered. Geotechnical design is covered by Eurocode 7
1
, which
supersedes several current British Standards including BS 5930
2
, BS 8002
3

and BS 8004
4
. The new Eurocode marks a significant change in geotechnical
design in that limit state principles are used throughout and this should
ensure consistency between the Eurocodes. There are two parts to Eurocode 7,
Part 1: General rules and Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. Guidance on
the design of retaining walls can be found in Chapter 9.
The essential features of Eurocode 7, Part 1 relating to foundation design are
discussed in this chapter. It should be emphasised that this publication covers
only the design of simple foundations, which are a small part of the scope of
Eurocode 7. Therefore it should not be relied on for general guidance on this
Eurocode. At the time of writing it is anticipated that the National Annex (NA)
for Part 1 will be published in July 2007.
Limit states
The following ultimate limit states (ULS) should be satisfied for geotechnical
design; they each have their own combinations of actions. (For an explanation
of Eurocode terminology please refer to Chapter 1, originally published as
5
.)
EQU Loss of equilibrium of the structure.
STR Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure or structural
member.
GEO Failure due to excessive deformation of the ground.
UPL Loss of equilibrium due to uplift by water pressure.
HYD Failure caused by hydraulic gradients.
In addition, the serviceability limit states (SLS) should be satisfied. It will
usually be clear that one of the limit states will govern the design and
therefore it will not be necessary to carry out checks for all of them, although
it is considered good practice to record that they have all been considered.
Geotechnical Categories
Eurocode 7 recommends three Geotechnical Categories to assist in establishing
the geotechnical design requirements for a structure (see Table 1).
6. Foundations
R Webster CEng, FIStructE O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
44
Table 1
Geotechnical categories of structures
Category Description Risk of geotechnical failure Examples from Eurocode 7
1 Small and relatively simple structures Negligible None given
2 Conventional types of structure and foundation
with no difficult ground or loading conditions
No exceptional risk Spread foundations
3 All other structures Abnormal risks Large or unusual structures
Exceptional ground conditions
Table 2
Design values of actions derived for UK design, STR/GEO ultimate limit state persistent and transient design situations
Combination
Expression reference
from BS EN 1990
Permanent actions Leading variable
action
Accompanying variable actions
Combination 1 (Application of combination 1 (BS EN 1997) to set B (BS EN 1990))
Exp. (6.10) 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5
b
Q
k
1.5
b
c
o,i
c
Q
k,i
Exp. (6.10a) 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5 c
o
,
1
c
Q
k
1.5
b
c
o,i
c
Q
k,i
Exp. (6.10b) 0.925
d
x 1.35 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.5
b
Q
k
1.5
b
c
o,i
c
Q
k,i
Combination 2 (Application of combination 2 (BS EN 1997) to set C (BS EN 1990))
Exp. (6.10) 1.0 G
k
a
1.0 G
k
a
1.3
b
Q
k,1
1.3
b
c
o,i
b
Q
k,i
Key
k,j,sup
and G
k,j,inf
may be taken as G
k
b Where the action is favourable, g
Q
,
i
= 0 and the variable actions should be ignored
c The value of c
o
can be obtained from Table NA.A1.1 of the UK NA to BS EN 1990 (or see Table 3 of Chapter 1)
d The value of j in the UK NA to BS EN 1990 is 0.925
Table 3
Partial factors for geotechnical material properties
Angle of shearing
resistance
(apply to tan h)
Effective cohesion Undrained shear
strength
Unconfined strength Bulk density
Symbol g
h
g
c
g
cu
g
qu
g
g
Combination 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Combination 2 1.25 1.25 1.4 1.4 1.0
It is anticipated that structural engineers will take responsibility for the
geotechnical design of category 1 structures, and that geotechnical
engineers will take responsibility for category 3 structures. The
geotechnical design of category 2 structures may be undertaken by
members of either profession. This decision will very much depend on
individual circumstances.
Methods of design and combinations
There has not been a consensus amongst geotechnical engineers
over the application of limit state principles to geotechnical design.
Therefore, to allow for these differences of opinion, Eurocode 7
provides for three Design Approaches to be used for the ULS. The
decision on which approach to use for a particular country is given
in its National Annex. In the UK Design Approach 1 will be specified
in the National Annex. For this Design Approach (excluding pile and
anchorage design) there are two sets of combinations to use for the
STR and GEO ultimate limit states. The values for the partial factors
to be applied to the actions for these combinations of partial factors
are given in Table 2 and the partial factors for the geotechnical
material properties are given in Table 3. Combination 1 will generally
govern the structural resistance, and Combination 2 will generally
govern the sizing of the foundations.

The partial factors for soil resistance to sliding and bearing should be
taken as 1.0 for both combinations.
The partial factors to be applied to the actions at the EQU limit state
are given in Table 4; the geotechnical material partial factors being the
same as for Combination 2 in Table 3.
For the SLS, Eurocode 7 does not give any advice on whether the
characteristic, frequent or quasi-permanent combination should be
used. Where the prescriptive method is used for spread foundations
(see page 3) then the characteristic values should be adopted. For
45
6. Foundations
direct methods of calculation the frequent combination can be used
for sizing of foundations and the quasi-permanent combination can be
used for settlement calculations.
Further information on design combinations can be found in Chapter 1,
5
.
Geotechnical design report
A geotechnical design report should be produced for each project,
even if it is only a single sheet. The report should contain details of
the site, interpretation of the ground investigation report, geotechnical
design recommendations and advice on supervision, monitoring and
maintenance of the works. It is likely that this report will require input
from more than one consultant, depending on whether the project is in
Geotechnical Category 1, 2 or 3.
The foundation design recommendations should include bearing
resistances and characteristic values for soil parameters. It should
also clearly state whether the values are applicable to SLS or ULS and
whether they are for Combination 1 or Combination 2.
Spread foundations
The geotechnical design of spread foundations (e.g. strip and pad
foundations) is covered by section 6 of Eurocode 7, Part 1 and this
gives three methods for design:
Direct method calculation is carried out for each limit state.
Indirect method experience and testing used to determine
serviceability limit state parameters that also satisfy all relevant
limit states (included in Eurocode 7 mainly to suit French design
methods, and is not discussed further here).
Prescriptive method in which a presumed bearing resistance is used.
For most spread foundations in the UK, settlement will be the
governing criterion; traditionally allowable bearing pressures have been
used to limit settlement. This concept of increasing the factor of safety
on bearing resistances to control settlement may still be used with the
prescriptive method. The exception is for soft clays where Eurocode 7
requires settlement calculations to be undertaken.
When using the direct method, calculations are carried out for each
limit state. At the ULS, the bearing resistance of the soil should be
checked using partial factors on the soil properties as well as on
the actions. At the SLS the settlement of the foundations should be
calculated and checked against permissible limits.
The prescriptive method may be used where calculation of the soil
properties is not possible or necessary and can be used provided that
conservative rules of design are used. Therefore reference can continue
to be made to Table 1 of BS 8004 (see Table 5) to determine presumed
(allowable) bearing pressures for category 1 structures and preliminary
calculations for category 2 structures. Alternatively, the presumed
bearing resistance to allow for settlement can be calculated by the
geotechnical designer and included in the geotechnical design report.
Table 4
Design values of actions derived for UK design, EQU ultimate limit
state persistent and transient design situations
Combination
Expression
reference
Permanent actions Leading
variable
action
Accompanying variable
actions
Unfavourable Favourable Main
(if any)
Others
Exp. (6.10) 1.1 G
k
a
0.90 G
k
a
1.5
b
Q
k
1.5
c
c
o,i

c
Q
k,i
Key
k, j, sup

and G
k, j, inf
may be taken as G
k
b Where the action is favourable, g
Q
,
i
= 0 and the variable actions should be ignored
c The value of c
o
can be obtained from Table NA.A1.1 of the UK NA to BS EN 1990
Table 5
Presumed allowable bearing values under static loading (from BS 8004)
Category Type of soil Presumed allowable bearing value (kN/m
2
) Remarks
Non-
cohesive
soils
Dense gravel, or dense sand and gravel > 600 Width of foundation not less than 1 m.
Groundwater level assumed to be below the base
of the foundation.
Medium dense gravel, or medium
dense sand and gravel
< 200 to 600
Loose gravel, or loose sand and gravel < 200
Compact sand > 300
Medium dense sand 100 to 300
Loose sand < 100
Cohesive
soils
Very stiff boulder clay and hard clay 300 to 600 Susceptible to long-term consolidation settlement
Stiff clay 150 to 300
Firm clay 75 to 150
Soft clay and silt <75
Very soft clay and silt Not applicable
Note
These values are for preliminary design purposes only.
46
Partial factors for the soil parameters used to determine the resistances
can be obtained from Table 3 above (Combination 2).
The pressure distribution under the base should be assessed to ensure
that the maximum pressure does not exceed the bearing resistances
obtained from the geotechnical design report at both EQU and GEO
ultimate limit states (see Figure 2). If the eccentricity is greater than
L/6 at SLS, then the pressure distribution used to determine the
settlement should be modified because tension cannot occur between
the base and the soil. In this case the designer should satisfy himself
that there will be no adverse consequences (e.g. excessive rotation of
the base). It should also be noted that the ULS pressure distribution
diagram will be rectangular and not trapezoidal.
Reinforced concrete pads
Where the pad foundations require reinforcement the following checks
should be carried out to ensure:
Sufficient reinforcement to resist bending moments.
Punching shear strength.
Beam shear strength.
The moments and shear forces should be assessed using the STR
combination:
1.35 G
k
+ 1.5 Q
k
STR combination 1 (Exp. (6.10))
However, there may be economies to made from using Expressions
(6.10a) or (6.10b) from the Eurocode.
The critical bending moments for design of bottom reinforcement
are located at the column faces. Both beam shear and punching
shear should then be checked at the locations shown in Figure 3. For
punching shear the ground reaction within the perimeter may be
deducted from the column load (Expression (6.48), Eurocode 211
6
).
It is not usual for a pad foundation to contain shear reinforcement,
therefore it is only necessary to ensure that the concrete shear stress
capacity without shear reinforcement (v
Rd,c
see Table 6) is greater than
applied shear stress (v
Ed
= V
Ed
/(bd)).
If the basic shear stress is exceeded, the designer may increase the
depth of the base. Alternatively, the amount of main reinforcement
could be increased or, less desirably, shear links could be provided. (See
Chapter 4, originally published as Beams
8
for an explanation of how to
design shear reinforcement.)
A flow chart showing the design process for shallow foundations is
given in Figure 1.
Where there is a moment applied to the foundation, the EQU limit
state should also be checked. Assuming the potential overturning of
the base is due to the variable action from the wind, the following
combination should be used (the variable imposed action is not
considered to contribute to the stability of the structure):
0.9 G
k
+ 1.5 Q
k,w
EQU combination
where:
G
k
is the stabilising characteristic permanent action
(Use 1.1 G
k
for a destabilising permanent action)
Q
k,w
is the destabilising characteristic variable wind action
Figure 1
Procedures for depth of spread foundations
Design foundation (structural design) using the worst of
Combinations 1 and 2 (ULS) for actions and geotechnical
material properties.
START
Design using
direct method?
Obtain soil parameters from Ground Investigation report
Size foundation
(geotechnical design) using
the worst of Combinations
1 or 2 (ULS) for actions
and geotechnical material
properties. Combination 2
will usually govern.
Use prescriptive method.
Size foundation
(geotechnical design)
using SLS for actions
and presumed
bearing resistance
Is there an
overturning moment?
Check overturning using EQU
limit state for actions and
GEO Combination 2
for material properties.
Yes No
Yes
No
How to Foundations
Fi g 2 16.02.06
Job No.
M M
M
P
P
P
e
e e
e = / M P
P
P
L
L
L
L
1 +
e 6
6e
1
2P
1.5 3 L e
L = width of base
SLS pressure distributions ULS pressure distribution
or
Figure 2
Pressure Distribution for Pad Foundations
P
2 L e
P P P
Figure 2
Pressure distributions for pad foundations
47
6. Foundations
START
Determine value of factor
( =1.0 when applied moment is zero; refer to Expressions
(6.38) to (6.42) from BS EN 199211 for other cases)
Determine value of vEd,max
(design shear stress at face of column) from:
vEd,max = (VEd DVEd) (from Exp. (6.38))
(u0deff)
where u0 is perimeter of column
(see Clause 6.4.5 for columns at base edges)
deff = (dy + dz)/2 where dy and dz
are the effective depths in orthogonal directions
Determine value of vRd,max (refer to Table 7)
Determine concrete punching shear capacity vRd (without
shear reinforcement) from 2dvRd,c/a (Refer to Table 6 for vRd,c)
Yes
Either increase main
steel, or provide
punching shear
reinforcement required.
(Not recommended
for foundations.)
No
No shear reinforcement required. Check complete.
Figure 4
Procedure for determining punching shear capacity for pad foundations
Yes
Redesign foundation Is vEd,max < vRd, max?
No
Determine value of vEd, (design shear stress) from:
vEd = (VEd DVEd)
(u1deff)
where u1 is length of control perimeter (refer to Figure 5). For
eccentrically loaded bases, refer to Exp. (6.51).
The control perimeter will have to be found through iteration;
it will usually be between d and 2d
Is vEd < vRd at
critical perimeter?
Design for punching shear
Eurocode 2 provides specific guidance on the design of foundations for
punching shear, and this varies from that given for slabs. In Eurocode 2 the
shear perimeter has rounded corners and the forces directly resisted by
the ground should be deducted (to avoid unnecessarily conservative
designs). The critical perimeter should be found iteratively, but it is
generally acceptable to check at d and 2d. Alternatively, a spreadsheet
could be used (e.g. spreadsheet TCC81 from Spreadsheets for concrete
design to BS 8110 and Eurocode 2
7
). The procedure for determining the
punching shear requirements is shown in Figure 4.
Table 6
v
Rd
,
c
r
l Effective depth, d (mm)
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
a
0.25% 0.47 0.43 0.40 0.38 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.34
0.50% 0.54 0.51 0.48 0.47 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.43
0.75% 0.62 0.58 0.55 0.53 0.52 0.51 0.50 0.49
1.00% 0.68 0.64 0.61 0.59 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.54
1.25% 0.73 0.69 0.66 0.63 0.62 0.60 0.59 0.58
1.50% 0.78 0.73 0.70 0.67 0.65 0.64 0.63 0.62
1.75% 0.82 0.77 0.73 0.71 0.69 0.67 0.66 0.65
2.00% 0.85 0.80 0.77 0.74 0.72 0.70 0.69 0.68
k 1.816 1.707 1.632 1.577 1.535 1.500 1.471 1.447
Key
a For depths greater than 1000 calculate vRd,c directly.
Notes
1 Table derived from: vRd,c = 0.12 k (100rI fck)
(1/3)
0.035 k
1.5
fck
0.5

where k = 1 + (200/d) 2 and rI = (rIy +rIz) 0.02,
rIy = Asy/(bd) and rIz = Asz/(bd)
2 This table has been prepared for fck = 30;
where rl exceed 0.40% the following factors may be used:
f
ck
25 28 32 35 40 45 50
Factor 0.94 0.98 1.02 1.05 1.10 1.14 1.19
Beam shear
faces
2d
Figure 3
Shear checks for pad foundations
d
d
h
Bends may be
required
Punching shear perimeters,
(load within deducted from V )
Ed
How to Foundations
Fi g 3 20.02.06
Job No.
Figure 3
Shear checks for pad foundations
How to Foundations
Fi g 5 20.02.06
Job No.
b
z
2d
2d
b
y
u
1
u
1
Figure 5
Typical basic control perimeters around loaded areas.
Figure 5
Typical basic control perimeters around loaded areas
48
flexure reference should be made to Chapter 4, originally published as
Beams
8
.
Alternatively, a truss analogy may be used; this is covered in Sections 5.6.4
and 6.5 of Eurocode 211. The strut angle y should be at least 21.8 to
the horizontal; note that y should be measured in the plane of the column
and pile.
Both beam shear and punching shear should then be checked as shown in
Figure 6. For beam shear, the design resistances in Table 6 may be used. If the
basic shear stress is exceeded, the designer should increase the depth of the
base. Alternatively, the amount of main reinforcement could be increased or,
less desirably, shear links could be provided. Care should be taken that main
bars are fully anchored. As a minimum, a full anchorage should be provided
from the inner face of piles. Large radius bends may be required.
When assessing the shear capacity in a pile cap, only the tension steel
placed within the stress zone should be considered as contributing to the
shear capacity (see Figure 7).
Raft foundations
The basic design processes for rafts are similar to those for isolated
pad foundations or pilecaps. The only difference in approach lies in the
selection of an appropriate method for analysing the interaction between
the raft and the ground so as to achieve a reasonable representation of
their behaviour. For stiffer rafts (i.e. span-to-thickness greater than 10) with
a fairly regular layout, simplified approaches such as yield line or the flat
slab equivalent frame method may be employed, once an estimation of
the variations in bearing pressure has been obtained from a geotechnical
specialist. Whatever simplifications are made, individual elastic raft
reactions should equate to the applied column loads.
Thinner, more flexible rafts or those with a complex layout may require
the application of a finite element or grillage analysis. For rafts bearing
on granular sub-grades or when contiguous-piled walls or diaphragm
perimeter walls are present, the ground may be modelled as a series
of Winkler springs. However, for cohesive sub-grades, this approach is
unlikely to be valid, and specialist software will be required.
Piled foundations
For the purpose of this chapter it is assumed that the pile design will be
carried out by a specialist piling contractor. The actions on the piles must
be clearly conveyed to the pile designer, and these should be broken down
into the unfactored permanent actions and each of the applicable variable
actions (e.g. imposed and wind actions). The pile designer can then carry
out the structural and geotechnical design of the piles.
Where moments are applied to the pilecap the EQU combination
should also be used to check the piles can resist the overturning forces.
These EQU loads must also be clearly conveyed to the pile designer
and procedures put in place to ensure the piles are designed for the
correct forces.
A pilecap may be treated as a beam in bending, where the critical
bending moments for the design of the bottom reinforcement are
located at the column faces. For further guidance on designing for
Table 7
Values for v
Rd, max
f
ck
v
Rd,max
20 3.68
25 4.50
28 4.97
30 5.28
32 5.58
35 6.02
40 6.72
45 7.38
50 8.00
How to Foundations
Fi g 8 20.02.06
Job No.
a a
b
F
h
F
Figure 8
Dimensions for plain foundations
Figure 8
Dimensions for plain foundations
Stress zone
45
o
A
s
contributing to shear capacity
Figure 7
Shear reinforcement for pilecaps.
How to Foundations
Fi g 7 20.02.06
Job No.
Figure 7
Shear reinforcement for pilecaps
Punching shear 5 2d from column face
f /5
f /5
f
Beam shear 5 d from column face
Figure 6
Critical shear perimeters for piles
How to Foundations
Fi g 6 20.02.06
Job No.
Figure 6
Critical shear perimeters for piles
49
6. Foundations
Table 8
f
ck
f
ctm
Minimum % (0.26 f
ctm
/f
yk
a
)
25 2.6 0.13%
28 2.8 0.14%
30 2.9 0.15%
32 3.0 0.16%
35 3.2 0.17%
40 3.5 0.18%
45 3.8 0.20%
50 4.1 0.21%
Key
a Where f
yk
= 500 MPa.
Plain concrete foundations
Strip and pad footings may be constructed from plain concrete
provided the following rules are adhered to.
In compression, the value of a
cc
, the coefficient taking account of
long-term effects applied to design compressive strength
(see Cl. 3.1.6), should be taken as 0.6 as opposed to 0.85 for
reinforced concrete.
The minimum foundation depth, h
F
, (see Figure 8) may be
calculated from:

where:
s
gd
= the design value of the ground bearing pressure
f
ctd
= the design concrete tensile strength from Exp. (3.16)
For many situations this is unlikely to offer any savings over the current
practice of designing for h
f
a.
The possibility of splitting forces, as advised in Clause 9.8.4 of Eurocode
211, may need to be considered.
Eurocode 2 allows plain concrete foundations to contain reinforcement
for control of cracking.
Crack control
Refer to Chapter 2, originally published as Getting started
9
.
Minimum area of principal reinforcement
The minimum area of reinforcement is A
s,min
= 0.26 f
ctm
b
t
d/f
yk
but not
less than 0.0013b
t
d (see Table 8).
Except at lap locations, the maximum area of tension or compression
reinforcement, should not exceed A
s,max
= 0.04 A
c
The minimum spacing of bars should be the greater of:
Bar diameter,
Aggregate size plus 5 mm, or
20 mm.
Deep elements
For deep elements the advice in Eurocode 2 for the side faces of deep
beams may be followed. The UK National Annex recommends that 0.2%
is provided in each face. The distance between bars should not exceed
the lesser of twice the beam depth or 300 mm. For pile caps the side
face may be unreinforced if there is no risk of tension developing.
A
c
A
s
A
s, prov
A
s, reqd
d Effective depth
d
eff
Average effective depth (d
y
+ d
z
) /2
f
cd
cc
f
ck
/g
c
f
ck
f
ctm
ck
2/3
for f
ck
C50/60
G
k
Characteristic value of permanent action
h Overall depth of the section
l
eff
Q
k
Characteristic value of a variable action
Q
k,w
Characteristic value of a variable wind action
V
Ed
Design value of applied shear force
v
Ed
Design value of applied shear stress
V
Rd,c
Design value of the punching shear
resistance without punching shear reinforcement
v
Rd,c
Design value of the punching shear stress
resistance without punching shear reinforcement
v
Rd,max
Design value of the maximum punching shear
resistance along the control section considered
x
max
z Lever arm
a
cc
effects on compressive strength and of axial loads, 1.0 for
unfavourable effects resulting from the way other phenomena
load is applied (From UK National Annex)
b Factor for determining punching shear stress
d Ratio of the redistributed moment to the elastic
bending moment
g
m
Partial factor for material properties
r
0
Reference reinforcement ratio f
ck
/1000
r
l
Required tension reinforcement at mid-span A
s
l bd
c
0
Factor for combination value of a variable action
c
1
Factor for frequent value of a variable action
c
2
Factor for quasi-permanent value of a variable action
Selected symbols
50
References
1 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 1997: Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design. BSI (2 parts).
2 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 5930: Code of practice for site investigation. BSI, 1999.
3 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8002: Code of practice for earth retaining structures. BSI, 1994.
4 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8004: Code of practice for foundations. BSI, 1986.
7 GOODCHILD, C H & WEBSTER R M. Spreadsheets for concrete design to BS 8110 and Eurocode 2, version 3. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
6. Foundations
Ref: TCC/03/21
ISBN 1-904818-31-5
First published April 2006, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
Acknowledgements
This chapter covers the analysis and design of concrete flat slabs to Eurocode
2
1
, a process which is essentially the same as when using BS 8110
2
. However,
the layout and content of Eurocode 2 may appear unusual to designers
familiar with BS 8110. Eurocode 2 does not contain the derived formulae or
specific guidance on determining moments and shear forces. This has arisen
because it has been European practice to give principles in the codes and for
the detailed application to be presented in other sources such as textbooks.
3
, highlighted the
It should be noted that values from the UK National Annex (NA) have been
used throughout this publication, including values that are embedded in
derived formulae (derivations can be found at www.eurocode2.info). A list of
symbols related to flat slab design is given at the end of this chapter.
Analysis
Using Eurocode 2 for the analysis of flat slabs is similar to using BS 8110. The
following methods may be used:
Equivalent frame method
Finite element analysis
Yield line analysis
Grillage analogy
The Eurocode gives further advice on the equivalent frame method in
Annex I and designers used to BS 8110 will find this very familiar. Once the
bending moments and shear forces have been determined, the following
guidance can be used for the design of flat slabs.
Design procedure
A procedure for carrying out the detailed design of flat slabs is shown in Table 1.
This assumes that the slab thickness has previously been determined during
conceptual design. Concept designs prepared assuming detailed design would
be to BS 8110 may be continued through to detailed design using Eurocode 2.
More detailed advice on determining design life, loading, material properties,
methods of analysis, minimum concrete cover for durability and bond, and
control of crack widths can be found in Chapter 2, originally published as
Getting started
4
.
7. Flat slabs
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
52
Table 1
Flat slab design procedure
Chapter in this publication Standard
1 Determine design life 2: Getting started NA to BS EN 1990 Table NA.2.1
2 Assess actions on the slab 2: Getting started BS EN 1991 (10 parts) and National Annexes
3 Determine which combinations of actions apply 1: Introduction to Eurocodes NA to BS EN 1990 Tables NA.A1.1 and NA.A1.2 (B)
4 Determine loading arrangements 2: Getting started NA to BS EN 199211
6 Check cover requirements for appropriate fire resistance period 2: Getting started and Table 2 Approved Document B. BS EN 199211: Section 5
7 Calculate min. cover for durability, fire and bond requirements 2: Getting started BS EN 199211 Cl 4.4.1
8 Analyse structure to obtain critical moments and shear forces 2: Getting started and Table 3 BS EN 199211 Section 5
9 Design flexural reinforcement See Figure 1 BS EN 199211 Section 6.1
10 Check deflection See Figure 3 BS EN 199211 Section 7.4
11 Check punching shear capacity See Figure 6 BS EN 199211 Section 6.4
12 Check spacing of bars 2: Getting started BS EN 199211 Section 7.3
13 Check resistance to moment transfer from column to slab BS EN 199211 Annex I 1.2(5)
Note
NA = National Annex
Table 2
Minimum dimensions and axis distances for reinforced concrete slabs
Standard fire resistance Minimum dimensions (mm)
Slab thickness, h
s
Axis distance, a
REI 60 180 15
a
REI 90 200 25
REI 120 200 35
REI 240 200 50
Notes
1 This table is taken from BS EN 199212 Table 5.9.
2 The axis distance is to the centre of the outer layer of reinforcement.
3 The table is valid only if the detailing requirements (see note 4) are observed and, in the normal temperature design, redistribution of bending moments does not exceed 15%.
4 For fire resistance of R90 and above, at least 20% of the total top reinforcement in each direction over intermediate supports required by BS EN 199211 should be continuous over
the full span. This reinforcement should be placed in the column strip.
5 There are three standard fire exposure conditions that may need to be satisfied:
I Insulation
Key
Fire resistance
5
, gives a choice of advanced,
simplified or tabular methods for determining the fire resistance. Using
tables is the fastest method for determining the minimum dimensions
and cover for flat slabs. There are, however, some restrictions and if these
apply further guidance can be obtained from specialist literature
6
.
Rather than giving a minimum cover, the tabular method is based
on nominal axis distance, a. This is the distance from the centre of
the reinforcing bar to the surface of the member. It is a nominal
(not minimum) dimension, so the designer should ensure that
a c
nom
+ f
link
+ f
bar
/2
The requirements for flat slabs are given in Table 2.
Flexure
The design procedure for flexural design is given in Figure 1; this
includes derived formulae based on the simplified rectangular stress
block from Eurocode 2. Where appropriate Table 3 may be used to
determine bending moments for flat slabs.
53
7. Flat slabs
Whichever method of analysis is used, Cl. 9.4.1 requires the designer
to concentrate the reinforcement over the columns. Annex I of the
Eurocode gives recommendations for the equivalent frame method on
how to apportion the total bending moment across a bay width into
column and middle strips to comply with Cl. 9.4.1. Designers using
grillage, finite element or yield line methods may also choose to follow
the advice in Annex I to meet this requirement.
presented here is the simplified rectangular stress block (see Figure 2),
which is similar to that found in BS 8110.
The Eurocode gives recommendations for the design of concrete up
to class C90/105. However, for concrete strength greater than class
C50/60, the stress block is modified. It is important to note that
concrete strength is based on the cylinder strength and not the cube
strength (i.e. for class C28/35 the cylinder strength is 28 MPa, whereas
the cube strength is 35 MPa).
Table 4
Values for K
% redistribution d (redistribution ratio) K
0 1.00 0.208
a
10 0.90 0.182
a
15 0.85 0.168
20 0.80 0.153
25 0.75 0.137
30 0.70 0.120
Key
a It is often recommended in the UK that K should be llimited to 0.168 to ensure
ductile failure
Table 5
z/d for singly reinforced rectangular sections
K z/d K z/d
0.05 0.950
a
0.13 0.868
0.06 0.944 0.14 0.856
0.07 0.934 0.15 0.843
0.08 0.924 0.16 0.830
0.09 0.913 0.17 0.816
0.10 0.902 0.18 0.802
0.11 0.891 0.19 0.787
0.12 0.880 0.20 0.771
Key
a Limiting z to 0.95d is not a requirement of Eurocode 2, but is considered to be good practice
Table 6
f
ck
f
ctm
Minimum % (0.26 f
ctm
/f
yk
a
)
25 2.6 0.13%
28 2.8 0.14%
30 2.9 0.15%
32 3.0 0.16%
35 3.2 0.17%
40 3.5 0.18%
45 3.8 0.20%
50 4.1 0.21%
Key
a Where f
yk
= 500 MPa
Figure 1
Table 3
Bending moment coefficients for flat slabs
End support/slab connection First
interior
support
Interior
spans
Interior
supports
Pinned Continuous
End
support
End
span
End
support
End
span
Moment 0 0.086Fl 0.04Fl 0.075Fl 0.086Fl 0.063Fl 0.063Fl
Notes
1 Applicable to slabs where the area of each bay exceeds 30 m
2
,
Q
k,

1.25 G
k
and q
k
5 kN/m
2
2 F is the total design ultimate load, l is the effective span
3 Minimum span > 0.85 longest span, minimum 3 spans
4 Based on 20% redistribution at supports and no decrease in span moments
Carry out analysis of slab to determine design moments
(M) (Where appropriate use coefficients from Table 3).
Check maximum reinforcement requirements.
A
s, max
= 0.04 A
c
for tension or compression
reinforcement outside lap locations
K = 0.60d 0.18d
2
0.21 where d 1.0
START
Yes
Yes
Outside scope of
this publication
Concrete class
C50/60?
No
Compression
reinforcement
required not
recommended for
typical slabs
Is K K ?
No
bd
2
f
ck
M
Obtain lever arm z from Table 5 or
1 + 0.95d z =
2
d
1 3.53K
[ ]
Calculate tension reinforcement required from
A
s
=
f
yd
z
M
Check minimum reinforcement requirements (see Table 6)
A
s, min
= where f
yk
25
f
yk
0.26 f
ctm
b
t
d
54
Deflection
Eurocode 2 has two alternative methods of designing for deflection;
either by limiting span-to-depth ratio or by assessing the theoretical
deflection using the Expressions given in the Eurocode. The latter is
dealt with in detail in Chapter 8, originally published as Deflection
calculations
7
.
The span-to-depth ratios should ensure that deflection is limited
to span/250 and this is the procedure presented in Figure 3. The
Background paper to the UK National Annex
8
notes that the span-to-
depth ratios are appropriate where the structure remains propped
during construction or until the concrete attains sufficient strength to
support the construction loads. It can generally be assumed that early
striking of formwork will not significantly affect the deflection after
installing the cladding and/or partitions
9
.
Punching shear
The design value of the punching shear force, V
Ed
, will usually be the
support reaction at the ultimate limit state. In principle the design
for punching shear in Eurocode 2 and BS 8110 is similar. The main
differences are as follows.
Standard factors for edge and corner columns that allow for
moment transfer (b) are greater in Eurocode 2. However, b can
be calculated directly from Expressions (6.38) to (6.46) of the
Eurocode to give more efficient designs.
Figure 2
Simplified rectangular stress block for concrete up to class C50/60
from Eurocode 2
Figure 4
Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios for flat slabs
Figure 3
Is basic l/d x F1 x F2 x F3 Actual l/d ?
Increase
A
s,prov
F3 = 310/s
s
Where s
s
s
s
may be assumed to be 310 MPa (i.e. F3 = 1.0)
Note: A
s,prov
1.5 A
s,reqd
(UK National Annex)
Determine basic l/d from Figure 4
Check complete
F1 = 1 0.1 ((b
f
/b
w
) 1) 0.8

(b
f
w
is rib breadth)
Otherwise F1 = 1.0
Where the slab span exceeds 8.5 m and it supports
brittle partitions, F2 = 8.5/l
eff
Otherwise F2 = 1.0
No
Yes
START
The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that this

was the intention of the drafting committee and is in line with current UK practice.
Notes
1 This graph assumes a simply supported flat slab (K = 1.2).
2 Compression reinforcement, r, has been taken as 0.
3 Curves based on the following expressions:

where r r
0
and

where r > r
0
. 11+ + = K
d
l
(
r r
)
f
ck
r
0
1.5
12
f
ck

r
0
r
[ ]
11+ + 3.2 1 = K
d
l
r
f
ck
r
0
1.5
f
ck

r
r
0
[ ( ) ]
1.5
f
ck
= 50
f
ck
= 45
f
ck
= 40
f
ck
= 35
f
ck
= 32
f
ck
= 30
f
ck
= 28
f
ck
= 25
f
ck
= 20
s
/bd)
39
37
35
33
31
29
27
25
23
21
19
17
15
0.40% 0.60% 0.80% 1.20% 1.80%
S
p
a
n
-
t
o
-
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
-
d
e
p
t
h

r
a
t
i
o

(
l
/
d
)
Figure 4
Basic span-to-depth ratios for flat slabs
File How to flat slabs Fig
v1 14.03.06
Job No.
1.00% 1.40% 1.60% 2.00%
55
7. Flat slabs
In Eurocode 2 the maximum value of shear at the column face is
not limited to 5 MPa, and depends on the concrete strength used.
With Eurocode 2 the permissible shear resistance when using shear
links is higher, although such designs may not be economic or
desirable.
The control perimeters for rectangular columns in Eurocode 2 have
rounded corners.
Where shear reinforcement is required the procedure in Eurocode 2
is simpler; the point at which no shear reinforcement is required can
be calculated directly and then used to determine the extent of the
area over which shear reinforcement is required.
It is assumed that the reinforcement will be in a radial arrangement.
However, the reinforcement can be laid on a grid provided the
spacing rules are followed.
The procedure for determining the punching shear requirements is
shown in Figure 6.
As an alternative to using shear links, proprietary shear stud rails
may be used. Eurocode 2 (Figure 6.22) allows them to be laid out
in a radial or cruciform pattern and gives spacing requirements for
both. Other techniques are available for increasing punching shear
resistance and these are covered in a best practice guide
10
.
Figure 5
Figure 6
Procedure for determining punching shear capacity
START
Determine value of factor
(refer to Figure 7 or Expressions (6.38) to (6.46)
of the Eurocode)
Determine value of vEd,max
(design shear stress at face of column) from:
vEd,max = VEd /(ui deff)
where ui is perimeter of column
deff = (dy + dz)/2 (dy and dz
are the effective depths in orthogonal directions)
Determine value of vRd,max from Table 7
Determine value of vEd, (design shear stress) from:
vEd,max = VEd /(ui deff)
where u1 is length of control perimeter (see Figure 8)
Yes
Redesign slab Is vEd,max vRd, max?
No
Determine concrete punching shear capacity
(without shear reinforcement), vRD,c from Table 8
where rl = (rly rlz)
0.5
(rly, rlz are the reinforcement ratios in two orthogonal
directions for fully bonded tension steel, taken over a
width equal to column width plus 3d each side.)
Is vEd > v
Rd,c
?
Yes
Punching shear
reinforcement not
required
No
Determine area of punching shear reinforcement per perimeter
from:
Asw = (vEd 0.75vRd,c)sr u1/(1.5 fywd,ef)
where
sr is the radial spacing of shear reinforcement (see Figure 9)
fywd,ef = 250 + 0.25 deff fywd (see Table 9)
Determine the length of the outer perimeter where shear
reinforcement not required from:
uout,ef = b VEd/(vRd,c d)
Determine layout of punching shear reinforcement
(see Spacing of punching shear reinforcement
Section and Figure 9).
s
), calculate the ratio G
k
/Q
k
, read
up the graph to the appropriate curve and read across to determine s
su
.
s
s
s
= s
su
A
s,req
A
s,prov
1
d
( ) )
Ratio G
k
/Q
k
U
n
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d

s
t
e
e
l

s
t
r
e
s
s
,

s
s
u
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
c
2
= 0.8, g
G
= 1.35
c
2

= 0.6, g
G

= 1.35
c
2
= 0.3, g
G

= 1.35
c
2

= 0.2, g
G

= 1.35
c
2

= 0.6, g
G

= 1.25
c
2
= 0.3, g
G

= 1.25
c
2
= 0.2, g
G

= 1.25
(
c
2

is the factor for quasi-permanent value of a variable action. For further
explanation refer to How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2:
3
.
56
Minimum area of reinforcement
The minimum area of longitudinal reinforcement in the main direction
is A
s,min
= 0.26 f
ctm
b
t
d/f
yk
but not less than 0.0013b d (see Table 6).
The minimum area of a link leg for vertical punching shear
reinforcement is
1.5A
sw,min
/(s
r
.s
t
) 0.08f
ck
/f
yk

which can be rearranged as
A
sw,min
(s
r
.s
t
)/F
where
s
r
= the spacing of the links in the radial direction
s
t
= the spacing of the links in the tangential direction
F can be obtained from Table 10
Outside lap locations, the maximum area of tension or compression
reinforcement should not exceed A
s,max
= 0.4 A
c

The minimum spacing of bars should be the greater of:
Bar diameter
Aggregate size plus 5 mm
20 mm
Maximum spacing of main reinforcement
For slabs less than 200 mm thick the following maximum spacing rules apply:
For the secondary reinforcement: 3.5h but not more than 450 mm
The exception is in areas with concentrated loads or areas of maximum
Figure 7
Recommended standard values for b
b = 1.5
b = 1.4
b = 1.15
Internal column
Corner column
Edge column
File How to Flat Slabs Figure 7
v1 14.03.06
Job No.
Figure 7
Recommended standard values for b
Table 8
v
Rd,c
r
I
Effective depth, d (mm)
200 225 250 275 300 350 400 450 500 600 750
0.25% 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.48 0.47 0.45 0.43 0.41 0.40 0.38 0.36
0.50% 0.59 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.54 0.52 0.51 0.49 0.48 0.47 0.45
0.75% 0.68 0.66 0.64 0.63 0.62 0.59 0.58 0.56 0.55 0.53 0.51
1.00% 0.75 0.72 0.71 0.69 0.68 0.65 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.59 0.57
1.25% 0.80 0.78 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.71 0.69 0.67 0.66 0.63 0.61
1.50% 0.85 0.83 0.81 0.79 0.78 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.70 0.67 0.65
1.75% 0.90 0.87 0.85 0.83 0.82 0.79 0.77 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.68
2.00% 0.94 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.85 0.82 0.80 0.78 0.77 0.74 0.71
k 2.000 1.943 1.894 1.853 1.816 1.756 1.707 1.667 1.632 1.577 1.516
Notes
1 Table derived from: v
Rd,c
= 0.12 k (100r
I
f
ck
)
1/3
0.035 k
1.5
f
ck
0.5
where
k = 1 + R(200/d) 2 and r
I
= R(r
ly
+ r
lz
) 0.02, r
ly
= A
sy
/(bd) and r
lz
= A
sz
/(bd)
2 This table has been prepared for f
ck
= 30;
Where r
I
exceeds 0.40% the following factors may be used:
f
ck
25 28 32 35 40 45 50
Factor 0.94 0.98 1.02 1.05 1.10 1.14 1.19
Figure 8
Typical basic control perimeters around loaded areas
How to Foundations
Fi g 5 20.02.06
Job No.
b
z
2d
2d
b
y
u
1
u
1
Figure 5
Typical basic control perimeters around loaded areas.
Table 7
Values for v
Rd, max
Table 9
Values for f
ywd,ef
f
ck
v
Rd, max
d
eff
f
ywd,ef
20 3.31 150 288
25 4.05 175 294
28 4.48 200 300
30 4.75 225 306
32 5.02 250 313
35 5.42 275 319
40 6.05 300 325
45 6.64 325 331
50 7.20 350 338
57
7. Flat slabs
Table 10
Factor, F, for determining A
sw, min
f
ck
Factor, F
25 1875
28 1772
30 1712
32 1657
35 1585
40 1482
45 1398
50 1326
Note
f
ck
has been taken as 500 MPa
moment where the following applies:
For the secondary reinforcement: 3h but not more than 400 mm
Where h is the depth of the slab.
For slabs 200 mm thick or greater, the bar size and spacing should be
limited to control the crack width and reference should be made to
Section 7.3.3 of the Eurocode or Chapter 2, originally published as
Getting started.
4
Spacing of punching shear reinforcement
Where punching shear reinforcement is required the following rules
should be observed.
It should be provided between the face of the column and kd
inside the outer perimeter where shear reinforcement is no longer
required. k is 1.5, unless the perimeter at which reinforcement is no
longer required is less than 3d from the face of the column. In this
case the reinforcement should be placed in the zone 0.3d to 1.5d
from the face of the column.
There should be at least two perimeters of shear links.
The radial spacing of the links should not exceed 0.75d
(see Figure 9).
The tangential spacing of the links should not exceed 1.5d within
2d of the column face.
The tangential spacing of the links should not exceed 2d for any
other perimeter.
The distance between the face of the column and the nearest shear
reinforcement should be less than 0.5d.
A
c
A
s
A
s2
Area of compression steel
A
s, prov
A
s, reqd
b Width of slab
d Effective depth
d
2
Effective depth to compression reinforcement
f
cd
cc
f
ck
/g
c
f
ck
f
ctm
ck
2/3
for f
ck
C50/60
h
s
Slab thickness
K Factor to take account of the different See Table N 7.4 in
structural systems UK National Annex
l
eff
l/d Limiting span-to-depth ratio
x
max
z Lever arm
a
cc
effects on compressive strength and of axial loads.
unfavourable effects resulting from the 1.0 for other phenomena
way load is applied (From UK National Annex)
d Ratio of the redistributed moment to the
elastic bending moment
g
m
Partial factor for material properties 1.15 for reinforcement (g
s
)
1.5 for concrete (g
c
)
r
0
Reference reinforcement ratio Rf
ck
/1000
r Required tension reinforcement at mid-span A
s
/bd
r Required compression reinforcement at A
s2
/bd
mid-span to resist the moment due to the
design loads (or at support for cantilevers)
Selected symbols
Figure 9
Punching shear layout
s
r
Outer control
perimeter
s 0.75
r
d
0.5 d
kd
Section A - A
s
t
Outer perimeter of shear
reinforcement
Outer control
perimeter
u
out
0.5 d
0.75d
1.5
(2 if > 2
from column)
d
d d
A
A
1.5d
Figure 9
Punching shear layout
File How to Flat Slabs Fig. 9
v1 14.03.06
Job No.
58
References
1 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199211, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures General rules and rules for buildings. BSI, 2004.
2 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 81101: The structural use of concrete Part 1, Code of practice for design and construction. BSI, 1997.
5 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199212, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules structural fire design. BSI, 2004.
6 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Handbook to BS EN 199212. DCLG, due 2006.
7 WEBSTER, R & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection calculations. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
8 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. Background paper to the UK National Annex to BS EN 199211 and BS EN 199212. BSI, 2006.
9 PALLETT, P. Guide to flat slab formwork and falsework. Construct, 2003.
10 BRITISH CEMENT ASSOCIATION. Prefabricated punching shear reinforcement for reinforced concrete flat slabs. BCA, 2001.
7. Flat slabs
Ref: TCC/03/22
ISBN 1-904818-32-3
First published May 2006, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
Acknowledgements
Methods for checking deflection
This chapter describes the use of Eurocode 2
1
to check deflection by
calculation. The alternative method for complying with the code requirements
is to use the deemed-to-satisfy span-to-effective-depth ratios, which are
appropriate and economic for the vast majority of designs. Further guidance
on the span-to-effective-depth method is given in Chapters 3, 4 and 7,
originally published as Beams
2
, Slabs
3
and Flat slabs
4
. However, there are
situations where direct calculation of deflection is necessary, as listed below:
When an estimate of the deflection is required.
When deflection limits of span/250 for quasi-permanent actions (see
reference 5 for Eurocode terminology) or span/500 for partition and/or
cladding loads are not appropriate.
When the design requires a particularly shallow member, direct calculation
of deflection may provide a more economic solution.
To determine the effect on deflection of early striking of formwork or of
temporary loading during construction.
Overview
In the past structures tended to be stiff with relatively short spans. As
technology and practice have advanced, more flexible structures have resulted.
There are a number of reasons for this, including:
The increase in reinforcement strength leading to less reinforcement being
required for the ultimate limit state (ULS) and resulting in higher service
stresses in the reinforcement.
Increases in concrete strength resulting from the need to improve both
durability and construction time, and leading to concrete that is more stiff
and with higher service stresses.
What affects deflection?
There are numerous factors
that affect deflection. These
factors are also often time-
related and interdependent,
which makes the prediction
of deflection difficult.
The main factors are:
Concrete tensile strength
Creep
Elastic modulus
Other factors include:
Degree of restraint
Magnitude of loading
Time of loading
Duration of loading
Cracking of the concrete
Shrinkage
Ambient conditions
Secondary load-paths
Stiffening by other elements
8. Deflection calculations
R Webster CEng, FIStructE O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
60
A greater understanding of structural behaviour and the ability to
analyse that behaviour quickly by computer.
The requirement to produce economic designs for slabs whose
thicknesses are typically determined by the serviceability limit state
(SLS) and which constitute 80% to 90% of the superstructure costs.
Client requirements for longer spans and greater operational
flexibility from their structures.
Factors affecting deflection
An accurate assessment of deflection can only be achieved if
consideration is given to the factors that affect it. The more important
factors are discussed in detail below.
Tensile strength
The tensile strength of concrete is an important property because
the slab will crack when the tensile stress in the extreme fibre is
exceeded. In Eurocode 2 the concrete tensile strength, f
ctm,
is a mean
value (which is appropriate for deflection calculations) and increases
as the compressive strength increases. This is an advancement when
compared with BS 8110 where the tensile strength is fixed for all
concrete strengths.
The degree of restraint to shrinkage movements will influence the
effective tensile strength of the concrete. A layout of walls with high
restraint will decrease the effective tensile strength. Typical examples
of wall layouts are given in Figure 1. For a low restraint layout the
following expression may be used for the concrete tensile strength:
f
ctm,fl
= (1.6 h/1000)f
ctm
> f
ctm
where
f
ctm,fl
= Mean flexural tensile strength of reinforced concrete
f
ctm
= Mean tensile strength of concrete
It is often recommended that the design value of the concrete
tensile strength for a low restraint layout is taken as the average
of f
ctm,fl
and f
ctm
, to allow for unintentional restraint. For high restraint
f
ctm
should be used.
Creep
Creep is the time-dependant increase in compressive strain in a
concrete element under constant compressive stress. Creep is usually
considered in the design by modifying the elastic modulus using a
creep coefficient, h, which depends on the age at loading, size of
the member and ambient conditions, in particular relative humidity.
Eurocode 2 gives advice on the calculation of creep coefficients in
detail in Annex B. It also advises on the appropriate relative humidity
to use in Figure 3.1.
The cement strength class is required in the assessment of creep,
however, at the design stage it is often not clear which class should
be used. Generally, Class R should be assumed. Where the ground
granulated blastfurnace slag (ggbs) content exceeds 35% of the
cement combination or where fly ash (pfa) exceeds 20% of the
cement combination, Class N may be assumed. Where ggbs exceeds
65% or where pfa exceeds 35% Class S may be assumed.
Elastic modulus
The elastic modulus of concrete is influenced by aggregate type,
workmanship and curing conditions. The effective elastic modulus
under sustained loading will be reduced over time due to the effect
of creep. These factors mean that some judgement is required
to determine an appropriate elastic modulus. Eurocode 2 gives
recommended values for the 28-day secant modulus, E
cm
, (in Table 3.1)
and makes recommendations for adjustments to these values to
account for different types of aggregate. The long-term elastic modulus
should be taken as:
Figure 1
Typical floor layouts
a) Favourable layout of restraining walls (low restraint)
b) Unfavourable layout of restraining walls (high restraint)
Figure 1
Typical floor layouts
File How to Deflections Figure 1
29.03.06
Job No.
61
Commercial pressures often lead to a requirement to strike the formwork
as soon as possible and move on to subsequent floors, with the minimum
of propping. Tests on flat slabs have demonstrated that as much as 70%
of the loads from a newly cast floor (formwork, wet concrete, construction
loads) may be carried by the suspended floor below
7
. It can generally
be assumed that early striking of formwork will not greatly affect the
deflection after installing the cladding and/or partitions. This is because the
deflection affecting partitions will be smaller if the slab becomes cracked
before, rather than after, the installation of the cladding and/or partitions.
Cracking
Deflection of concrete sections is closely linked to the extent of
cracking and the degree to which cracking capacity is exceeded. The
point at which cracking occurs is determined by the moments induced
in the slab and the tensile strength of the concrete, which increases
with age. Often the critical situation is when the slab is struck, or when
the load of the slab above is applied. Once the slab has cracked its
stiffness is permanently reduced.
It is therefore necessary to find the critical loading stage at which
cracking first occurs. This critical loading stage corresponds with the
minimum value of K, where:
K f W
ctm
= 0.5
^ h
where
W = The serviceability loading applied up to that stage
f
ctm
= The concrete tensile strength at that stage
Where the frequent combination is the critical load stage, then
the degree of cracking (z) calculated for the frequent combination
should also be used for the quasi-permanent combination, but not for
E
c,LT
= E
c28
/(1 + h)
where
E
c28
= 28-day tangent modulus = 1.05 E
cm
h = Creep factor. (Note that with Eurocode 2, h relates to a 28-day
short-term elastic modulus, whereas a true creep factor would
be associated with the modulus at the age of loading.)
The assessment of the long-term E-value can be carried out more
accurately after the contractor has been appointed because they should be
able to identify the concrete supplier (and hence the type of aggregates)
and also the construction sequence (and hence the age at first loading).
Loading sequence
The loading sequence and timing may be critical in determining
the deflection of a suspended slab because it will influence the point
at which the slab will crack (if at all) and is used to calculate the creep
factors for the slab. A loading sequence is shown in Figure 2, which
shows that in the early stages relatively high loads are imposed while
casting the slab above. The loading sequence may vary, depending on
the construction method.
Smaller loads are imposed when further slabs are cast above. The loads
are then increased permanently by the application of the floor finishes
and erection of the partitions. Finally, the variable actions are applied
to the structure and, for the purpose of deflection calculation, the
quasi-permanent combination should be used. (See Chapter 1,
5
for further
information on combinations of actions.) However, it is likely that the
quasi-permanent combination will be exceeded during the lifetime
of the building and, for the purpose of determining whether the slab
might have cracked, the frequent combination may be critical.
Figure 2
Loading history for a slab an example
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Duration (days)
L
o
a
d

(
k
N
/
m
)
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Loading sequence
a Slab struck
b 1st slab above cast
c 2nd slab above cast
d 3rd slab above cast
e Floor finishes applied
f
g Quasi-permanent variable actions
h Frequent variable actions
Partitions erected
62
any of the earlier load stages. If, however, an earlier stage
proves critical, the z value at that stage should be carried
forward to all subsequent stages.
Further information can be found in the best practice
guide Early striking and improved backpropping
6.
Shrinkage curvature
Shrinkage depends on the water/cement ratio, relative
humidity and the size and shape of the member. The effect
of shrinkage in an asymmetrically reinforced section is to
induce a curvature that can lead to significant deflection in
shallow members. This effect should be considered in the
deflection calculations.
Methods for
calculating deflections
Two methods for calculating deflection are presented
below, and these are based on the advice in TR58
Deflections in concrete slabs and beams
8
.
Rigorous method
The rigorous method for calculating deflections is the
most appropriate method for determining a realistic
estimate of deflection. However, it is only suitable for
use with computer software. The Concrete Centre has
produced a number of spreadsheets that use this method
to carry out deflection calculations for a variety of slabs
and beams
9
. These offer a cost-effective way to carry
out detailed deflection calculations, and they include the
ability to consider the effect of early age loading of the
concrete. Figure 3 illustrates the principles of the method
and shows how the factors affecting deflection are
considered in the rigorous deflection calculations.
Finite element analysis may also be used to obtain
estimates of deflection. In this case the principles
in Figure 3 should be applied if credible results are to
be obtained.
Panel 1
Determining long term elastic modulus of elasticity
Calculate long-term elastic modulus, E
LT
from:
E
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
E
W
eff,1
1
eff, 2
2
eff, 3
3
eff, 4
4
eff, 5
5
LT
= + + + + RW c m
where
E
eff
= E
c28
/(1+h)
W
n
= Serviceability load at stage n
h = Creep coefficient at relevant loading time
and duration
Figure 3
Outline of rigorous method for calculating deflection
Collate input data
Element dimensions and reinforcement details and arrangements from the
ultimate limit state design
Loading sequence e.g.
Striking the formwork
Casting the floor above
Erection of the partitions and/or cladding
Application of finishes
The sequence will vary from project to project
Concrete properties (see Table 1)
Mean compressive strength (f
cm
)
Mean tensile strength (f
ctm
or f
ctm,fl
)
Elastic modulus (E
c28
) = 1.05 E
cm
Critical arrangement of actions
(or repeat the calculations for each arrangement to determine the critical case)
Determine the curvature of the slab
Assess whether the element has flexural cracking
Determine the critical load stage at which cracking first occurs.
(See Cracking on page 3)
Calculate the following properties:
Creep coefficients, h (Annex B of Eurocode 2 or Figure 4)
Long term elastic modulus, E
LT
(see Panel 1)
Effective modulus ratio, a
e
from: a
e
= E
s
/E
LT
Neutral axis depth for uncracked condition, x
u
(see Panel 2)
Second moment of area for uncracked condition, I
u
(see Panel 2)
Calculate cracking moment, M
cr
from:
M
cr
= f
ctm
I
u
/(h x
u
), using appropriate value for f
ctm
.
Does the moment at the critical load stage exceed the cracking moment?
If yes, the element is cracked at all subsequent stages.
z = 1 0.5(M
cr
/M)
2
[z = 0 for uncracked situation]
Use these critical values of f
ctm
and z for subsequent stages.
If no, the element will not crack at any stage.
When the slab is cracked calculate the following properties at the load stage
being considered, using appropriate values for f
ctm
, z and E
LT
:
Neutral axis depth for cracked section, x
c
(see Panel 2)
Second moment of area for cracked condition, I
c
(see Panel 2)
Calculate the flexural curvature:
] g 1
1
r E I
M
fl e c
E I
e u
QP
M
QP
= + g g
Calculate the curvature due to shrinkage strain 1/r
cs
(see Panel 2)
Calculate the total curvature, 1/r
t
= 1/r
fl
+ 1/r
cs
If deflection affecting cladding and/or partitions is required, repeat calculations
for frequent combination and for loading at time of installation of partitions
and/or cladding.
Repeat the calculations at frequent intervals (say at 1/20 points) and integrate
twice to obtain the overall deflection.
Estimate deflections:
Overall deflection (quasi-permanent combination)
Deflection affecting partitions/cladding (Frequent combination deflection
less deflection at time of installation)
R
e
p
e
a
t

a
t

1
/
2
0

p
o
i
n
t
s

f
o
r

a
l
l

t
h
r
e
e

l
o
a
d
i
n
g

s
t
a
g
e
s
63
Table 1
Concrete properties
f
ck
MPa 320 325 328 330 332 335 340 350
f
cm =
(f
ck
+ 8) MPa 328 333 336 338 340 343 348 358
f
ctm =
(0.3 f
ck
(2/3)
C50/60 or 2.12 ln(1 + (f
cm
/10)) > C50/60) MPa 332.21 332.56 332.77 332.90 333.02 333.21 333.51 334.07
f
ctm
*
=
(0.3 f
cm
(2/3)
C50/60 or 1.08 ln(f
cm
) + 0.1 > C50/60)
a
MPa 332.77 333.09 333.27 333.39 333.51 333.68 333.96 334.50
E
cm =
(22 [(f
cm
)/10]
0.3
GPa 330.0 331.5 332.3 332.8 333.3 334.1 335.2 337.3
E
c28 =
(1.05 E
cm
) GPa 331.5 333.0 333.9 334.5 335.0 335.8 337.0 339.1
e
cd,0
CEM class R, RH = 50% microstrain 746 706 683 668 653 632 598 536
e
cd,0
CEM class R, RH = 80% microstrain 416 394 381 372 364 353 334 299
e
cd,0
CEM class N, RH= 50% microstrain 544 512 494 482 471 454 428 379
e
cd,0
CEM class N, RH= 80% microstrain 303 286 275 269 263 253 239 212
e
cd,0
CEM class S, RH = 50% microstrain 441 413 397 387 377 363 340 298
e
cd,0
CEM class S, RH = 80% microstrain 246 230 221 216 210 202 189 166
e
ca
() microstrain 325 338 345 350 355 363 375 100
Key
a f
ctm
* may be used when striking at less than 7 days or where construction overload is taken into account.
Panel 2
Useful Expressions for a rectangular section
g g g
bh + + + x -
1
2
1
1
3
1
r
I
S
x
bh
A d d
I
12
bh
2
h
A d x x d
I
bx
A d x
A
s e s2 2
u
3
u u
2
s
A
e 2 u s2
c
c
3
e s
A
s2
d
2
2 2
cs
cs e
u
u
2
u
c
x
c
= + - 1
=
+ - +
=
- - -
= + - - - +
g g f a
cs e
f a
a
a
a
e
a
] ] g
1 bh A A
e s s2
- + a ] ] g g
g
a ] ] ]
^
k g g
2 2
g
h
6 @
I
S
c
c
1 2 A b A d d b
s 2 s2
x A
s2
A
s2
A
c e
2
s e
0.5
= + + - + a A
s e
a
e
a a ] 1 -
e
a ] ^
^ ^ ^
^ ^ g 1 - - +
e
a ] h g h g h 7 A # -
+
g g g
bh + + + x -
1
2
1
1
3
1
r
I
S
x
bh
A d d
I
12
bh
2
h
A d x x d
I
bx
A d x
A
s e s2 2
u
3
u u
2
s
A
e 2 u s2
c
c
3
e s
A
s2
d
2
2 2
cs
cs e
u
u
2
u
c
x
c
= + - 1
=
+ - +
=
- - -
= + - - - +
g g f a
cs e
f a
a
a
a
e
a
] ] g
1 bh A A
e s s2
- + a ] ] g g
g
a ] ] ]
^
k g g
2 2
g
h
6 @
I
S
c
c
1 2 A b A d d b
s 2 s2
x A
s2
A
s2
A
c e
2
s e
0.5
= + + - + a A
s e
a
e
a a ] 1 -
e
a ] ^
^ ^ ^
^ ^ g 1 - - +
e
a ] h g h g h 7 A # -
+
g g g
bh + + + x -
1
2
1
1
3
1
r
I
S
x
bh
A d d
I
12
bh
2
h
A d x x d
I
bx
A d x
A
s e s2 2
u
3
u u
2
s
A
e 2 u s2
c
c
3
e s
A
s2
d
2
2 2
cs
cs e
u
u
2
u
c
x
c
= + - 1
=
+ - +
=
- - -
= + - - - +
g g f a
cs e
f a
a
a
a
e
a
] ] g
1 bh A A
e s s2
- + a ] ] g g
g
a ] ] ]
^
k g g
2 2
g
h
6 @
I
S
c
c
1 2 A b A d d b
s 2 s2
x A
s2
A
s2
A
c e
2
s e
0.5
= + + - + a A
s e
a
e
a a ] 1 -
e
a ] ^
^ ^ ^
^ ^ g 1 - - +
e
a ] h g h g h 7 A # -
+
g g g
bh + + + x -
1
2
1
1
3
1
r
I
S
x
bh
A d d
I
12
bh
2
h
A d x x d
I
bx
A d x
A
s e s2 2
u
3
u u
2
s
A
e 2 u s2
c
c
3
e s
A
s2
d
2
2 2
cs
cs e
u
u
2
u
c
x
c
= + - 1
=
+ - +
=
- - -
= + - - - +
g g f a
cs e
f a
a
a
a
e
a
] ] g
1 bh A A
e s s2
- + a ] ] g g
g
a ] ] ]
^
k g g
2 2
g
h
6 @
I
S
c
c
1 2 A b A d d b
s 2 s2
x A
s2
A
s2
A
c e
2
s e
0.5
= + + - + a A
s e
a
e
a a ] 1 -
e
a ] ^
^ ^ ^
^ ^ g 1 - - +
e
a ] h g h g h 7 A # -
+
g g g
bh + + + x -
1
2
1
1
3
1
r
I
S
x
bh
A d d
I
12
bh
2
h
A d x x d
I
bx
A d x
A
s e s2 2
u
3
u u
2
s
A
e 2 u s2
c
c
3
e s
A
s2
d
2
2 2
cs
cs e
u
u
2
u
c
x
c
= + - 1
=
+ - +
=
- - -
= + - - - +
g g f a
cs e
f a
a
a
a
e
a
] ] g
1 bh A A
e s s2
- + a ] ] g g
g
a ] ] ]
^
k g g
2 2
g
h
6 @
I
S
c
c
1 2 A b A d d b
s 2 s2
x A
s2
A
s2
A
c e
2
s e
0.5
= + + - + a A
s e
a
e
a a ] 1 -
e
a ] ^
^ ^ ^
^ ^ g 1 - - +
e
a ] h g h g h 7 A # -
+
where
A
s
= Area of tension reinforcement
A
s2
= Area of compression reinforcement
b = Breadth of section
d = Effective depth to tension
reinforcement
d
2
= Depth to compression reinforcement
h = Overall depth of section
a
e
= Modular ratio
S
u
= A
s
(d x
u
) A
s2
(x
u
d
2
)
S
c
= A
s
(d x
c
) A
s2
(x
c
d
2
)
100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300
h
o
(mm) h ? ( , ) t
0
C20/25
C25/30
C30/37
C35/45
C40/50
C45/55
C50/60
100 500 900 1300
h
0
(mm) h
100 100
N N R R S S
t
0
t
0
1 1
2 2
3 3
5 5
10 10
20 20
50 50
30 30
7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0 0
( , ? t )
0
A
E
B
D
C
a) Inside conditions - RH = 50% b) Outside conditions - RH = 80%
1100 700 300
Notes
1
2
3 Intersection point between lines D & E can also be above point A
4 For t
0
> 100 it is sufficiently accurate to assume t = 100
t
0
= age of concrete at time of loading
h
0
= 2A
c
/u
Key
How to use Nonogram
Figure 4
29.03.06
Job No.
Figure 4
Method for determining creep coefficient h(,t
0
)
64
Figure 6
27.03.06
Job No.
8
Loading Bending moment diagram
M M
M
M
al
W
l
0.125
M Wa a l = (1- )
0.0625
al
al
W/2 W/2
0.104
0.102
M =
Wal
2
q
ql
q
q
q
0.125
3 4a
48 (1-a)
If a = , K =
M
A
M
A
M
C
M
C
M
C M
C
M
B
M
B
Wal W
al
al
al al
a a (4 )
if = =0.25 a l , K
K = 0.083 (1 )
b =
1
80 Wl
2
24
(3 4 ) a
2
qa l
2 2
2
K = 0.104 (1 )
b =
M M
A
+
B
2
15.6
ql
2
K
a
6
1
12
1
2
2
2
End deflection
(3 ) a a
6
load at end = 0.333 K
12
b
4
M +M
A B
(5 4 ) a
3 4a
2 2
=
b
10
Simplified method
A simplified method for calculating deflection is presented in Figure 5.
It is feasible to carry out these calculations by hand, and they could be
used to roughly verify deflection results from computer software, or
used where a computer is not available.
The major simplification is that the effects of early age loading are not
considered explicitly; rather an allowance is made for their effect when
calculating the cracking moment. Simplified creep factors are used and
deflection from the curvature of the slab is approximated using a factor.
Figure 5
Simplified method for calculating deflection
Figure 6
Values for K for various bending moment diagrams
Calculate the moment, M
QP
, due to quasi-permanent actions at
the critical section (i.e. mid-span or at support for cantilever)
Calculate creep coefficient, h(,t0), using either Figure 4
or Annex B (in which case look-up f
cm
in Table 1)
START
Calculate flexural curvature
0.9
1
from
1
M
h
f I
r E I
M
1
KL
cr
x
u
ctm u
n eff c
E I
eff u
QP
M
QP
QP
2
=
= +
= +
=
g g
d
^ h
1
r
t, cs n QP
r
t,QP
1
r
1 1
r r
t,QP
Obtain concrete properties, f
ctm
, and E
c28
from Table 1
1 Calculate long term elastic modulus, E
eff
from: E
eff
= E
c28
/[1+h (,t0)]
2 Calculate effective modulus ratio, ae from ae = Es/Eeff, where Es is
elastic modulus for reinforcement (200 GPa)
3 Calculate depth to neutral axis for uncracked condition, xu
4 Calculate second moment of area for uncracked condition, Iu
Calculate depth to neutral axis for cracked
condition, x
c
and calculate second moment of area
for cracked condition, I
c
Yes
Finish
No
Calculate the deflection that will occur at the time of application of
the load due to partitions and/or cladding.
1 Calculate the creep coefficient h(t,t0), where t is the age when
partition/cladding loads are applied and t0 is the age of striking.
h(t,t0) h(,t0) bc(t,t0). For bc(t,t0) refer to Figure 7, alternatively
refer to Annex B of Eurocode 2.
2 Calculate the moment due to self-weight, partitions/cladding and any
other loads which have been applied prior to the installation of the
cladding/partition, Mpar and use in place of M
QP
3 Recalculate the section properties, curvature and hence deflection,
dpar, using h(t,t0) or equivalent instead of h(,t0)
4 The approximate deflection affecting cladding and partitions is
d = dQP dpar
Calculate cracking moment, M
cr
from:
0.9
1
from
1
M
h
f I
r E I
M
1
KL
cr
x
u
ctm u
n eff c
E I
eff u
QP
M
QP
QP
2
=
= +
= +
=
g g
d
^ h
1
r
t, cs n QP
r
t,QP
1
r
1 1
r r
t,QP
(Note the factor 0.9 has been introduced into this method
because the loading sequence is not considered)
Yes
No
Section is uncracked
z = 0
Is Mcr > MQP?
Section is cracked
z = 1 0.5(Mcr/MQP)
2
Calculate total shrinkage strain ecs from ecs = ecd + eca where:
ecd = kh ecd,0 = Drying shrinkage strain
kh = Coefficient based on notional size, see Table 2
ecd,0 = Nominal unrestrained drying shrinkage, see Table 1
eca = bas(t) eca() = eca() for long-term deflection, see Table 1
Calculate curvature due to shrinkage strain 1/rcs (see Panel 2)
Calculate total curvature
0.9
1
from
1
M
h
f I
r E I
M
1
KL
cr
x
u
ctm u
n eff c
E I
eff u
QP
M
QP
QP
2
=
= +
= +
=
g g
d
^ h
1
r
t, cs n QP
r
t,QP
1
r
1 1
r r
t,QP
Calculate quasi-permanent deflection from

0.9
1
from
1
M
h
f I
r E I
M
1
KL
cr
x
u
ctm u
n eff c
E I
eff u
QP
M
QP
QP
2
=
= +
= +
=
g g
d
^ h
1
r
t, cs n QP
r
t,QP
1
r
1 1
r r
t,QP
where K can be obtained from Figure 6 and L is the span.
Do you need
to calculate deflection
due to cladding and
partitions?
65
100 300 500 700 900
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
C
o
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
,

b
c

(
t
,

t
0
)
h
0
(mm)
Figure 7
Coefficient for development of creep
with time after loading
Notes
1 = age of concrete when partitions/cladding applied
2 = age of concrete when struck
3 = 30 ( = 38), however the coefficient os not particularly
sensitive to concrete class
4 Relative humidity is 50%(i.e. indoor conditions)
t
t
f f
0
ck cm
27.03.06
Job No.
t = 90, t0 = 7
t = 60, t0 = 7
t = 28, t0 = 7
t = 90, t0 = 3
t = 60, t0 = 3
t = 28, t0 = 3
Precamber
A slab or beam can be precambered to reduce the effect of deflection
below the horizontal (see Figure 8). However, in practice too much
precamber is generally used and the slab remains permanently
cambered. This is because of the difficulty in accurately calculating
deflection. A precamber of up to half the quasi-permanent
combination deflection could be used, but a lower figure is
recommended. Precamber does not reduce the deflections affecting
partitions or cladding.
Flat slabs
Flat slabs are very popular and efficient floor systems. However,
because they span in two directions, it can be difficult to calculate their
deflection. TR58
8
gives several suitable methods for assessing flat slab
deflection. Of these, a popular method is to take the average deflection
of two parallel column strips and to add the deflection of the middle
strip spanning orthogonally to get an approximation of the maximum
deflection in the centre of the slab.
The recommended acceptance criteria for a flat slab are shown in Figure 9.
Accuracy
The calculation of deflection in Eurocode 2 using the rigorous method
presented here is more advanced than that in BS 8110
10
. It can be
used to take account of early-age construction loading by considering
reduced early concrete tensile strengths.
However, the following influences on deflections cannot be accurately
assessed:
Tensile strength, which determines the cracking moment.
Construction loading.
Elastic modulus.
Therefore any calculation of deflection is only an estimate, and even the
most sophisticated analysis can still result in +15% to -30% error. It is
advisable to give a suitable caveat with any estimate of deflection that
others are relying on.
Figure 7
Coefficient for development of creep with time after loading
Table 2
Values for K
h
h
0 k
h
>100 1.0
>200 0.85
>300 0.75
>500 0.70
Notes
h0 is the notional size (mm) of the cross-section = 2A
c
/u
where
Ac = Concrete cross-sectional area
u = Perimeter of that part of the cross section which is exposed to drying
Notes
t = Age of concrete when partitions/cladding applied
t0 = Age of concrete when struck
fck = 30 (fcm = 38), however the coefficient is not particularly sensitive to concrete class
Figure 8
Precambering of slabs
Deflection affecting partitions
Just before installation
of partitions Precamber
Deflection due to
frequent combination
Deflection due to
quasi-permanent
combination
Figure 8
29.03.06
Job No.
Figure 9
Recommended acceptance criteria for flat slabs
27.03.06
Job No.
a
X
If maximum permitted = /
and X is the of position of
maximum
where
= span
= span-to-effective depth limit
then the deflection at X should not
be greater than 2 / .
(maximum deflection on gridlines
may be more critical)
?
?
L n
L
n
a n
Figure 9
Deflection limits for
Notes
If maximum permitted d = L/n and
X is the position of maximum d
where
L = Span
n = Limiting span-to-depth ratio,
e.g. 250
then the deflection at X should not be
greater than 2a/n.
(Maximum deflection on gridlines
may be more critical.)
66
References
1 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS EN 199211, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules and rules for building. BSI, 2004.
3 MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Slabs. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
4 MOSS, R M & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Flat slabs. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
5 NARAYANAN, R S & BROOKER, O. How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Introduction to Eurocodes. The Concrete Centre, 2005
6 BRITISH CEMENT ASSOCIATION. Early striking and improved backpropping. BCA, 2001. (Available from www.concretecentre.com)
7 PALLETT, P. Guide to flat slab formwork and falsework. Construct, 2003
8 THE CONCRETE SOCIETY. Technical report No. 58 Deflections in concrete slabs and beams. The Concrete Society, 2005.
9 GOODCHILD, C H & WEBSTER, R M. Spreadsheets for concrete design to BS 8110 and EC2, version 3. The Concrete Centre, 2006.
10 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 81101. Structural use of concrete Code of practice for design and construction. BSI, 1997.
Cladding tolerances
Deflection may affect cladding or glazing in the following ways:
When a slab deflects, the load on the central fixings will be relieved
and shed to outer fixings.
Manufacturers may say that their glazed systems can only
accommodate deflection as low as 5 mm.
There should be open discussions between the designers for the various
elements to determine the most cost-effective way of dealing with the
interaction of the structure and cladding.
Ref: TCC/03/23
ISBN 1-904818-33-1
First published May 2006, revised December 2006
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
0700 4 500 500 or 0700 4 CONCRETE
Acknowledgements
Errata
\\tccdata\tcc\Users\OBrooker\For KMS\How to errors v4.doc Revision 4/23 March 2007 Page 1 of 4
All advice or information from The Concrete Centre is intended for those who will evaluate the significance and limitations of its
contents and take responsibility for its use and application. No liability (including that for negligence) for any loss resulting from such
advise or information is accepted by The Concrete Centre or their subcontractors, suppliers or advisors.
Location Original Amendment
Table 5, rows 3,5,7 & 9 1.5 Q
k
1.5
c
Q
k

Page 6, Item 13 in left
hand column
The punching shear checks are carried at
2d from the face of the column
The punching shear checks are carried out at 2d
from the face of the column
Getting started
Table 6, row 3 0.900 Gl + 0.100 Ql 0.090 Gl + 0.100 Ql
Table 10, notes - Note 2 added:
a is the axis distance (see Figure 4)
Note 3 added:
h
s
is the slab thickness, including non-
combustible flooring
Table 8, row 9 Car park elements subject to airborne
chlorides only
Elements subject to airborne chlorides only
Slabs
Table 3, note 2 F is the total design ultimate load, l, is
the effective span
F is the total design ultimate load, l, is the span
Table 3, new note 4 - Based on 20% redistribution at support and no
decrease in span moments
Table 4, values for K

% redistribution K
0 0.205
5 0.193
10 0.180
15 0.166
20 0.151
25 0.136

% redistribution K
0 0.208
a
10 0.182
a
15 0.168
20 0.153
25 0.137
30 0.120
Table 4, new key - a It is often recommended in the UK that
Kshould be limited to 0.168 to ensure ductile
failure
Table 5, 6 0.954 0.950
a
Figure 3, box 5 from top
of diagram
s
may assumed to be 310 MPa

s
may be assumed to be 310 MPa

Figure 5, heading Basic span-to-depth ratios Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios
Figure 5, Note 2 - K = 0.4 for cantilevers
Figure 5, Note 4
( )

+

+ =
0
0
12
5 1
11
'
'
.
ck ck
f f
K
d
l

( )

+

+ =
0
0
12
5 1
11
'
'
.
ck ck
f f
K
d
l

Errata
Page 5 Design for shear It is not usual for a slab to contain shear
reinforcement, therefore it is only
necessary to ensure that the concrete
shear stress capacity without shear
reinforcement (v
Rd,c
see Table 7) is less
than applied shear stress (v
Ed
= V
Ed
/(bd
)).
It is not usual for a slab to contain shear
reinforcement, therefore it is only necessary to
ensure that the concrete shear stress capacity
without shear reinforcement (v
Rd,c
see Table
7) is more than applied shear stress (v
Ed
= V
Ed

/(bd )).

Page 6 Ribbed or waffle
slabs
Current practices for determining forces
in ribbed and waffle slabs may also be
used for designs to Eurocode 2. Where a
waffle slab is treated as a two-way slab
refer to previous section. Where it is
treated as a flat slab reference may be
made to How to design concrete
structures to Eurocode 2: Flat slabs
4

Current practices for determining forces in
ribbed and waffle slabs may also be used for
designs to Eurocode 2. Where a waffle slab is
treated as a two-way slab refer to previous
section, but note that their torsional stiffness is
significantly less than for a two-way slab and
the bending moment coefficients may not be
applicable. Where it is treated as a flat slab
reference may be made to How to design
concrete structures to Eurocode 2: Flat slabs
4

Page 7 Maximum
spacing of
reinforcement
For slabs 200 mm thick or greater
reference should be made to section
7.3.3 of the Code or Chapter 2,
5
.
For slabs 200 mm thick or greater the bar size
and spacing should be limited to control the
crack width and reference should be made to
section 7.3.3 of the Code or Chapter 2,
5
.
Beams
Table 2, row 5 b
min
in column C = 300 b
min
in column C = 200
Table 3, row 3 0.900 Gl + 0.100 Ql 0.090 Gl + 0.100 Ql

% redistribution K
0 0.205
5 0.193
10 0.180
15 0.166
20 0.151
25 0.136

% redistribution K
0 0.208
a
10 0.182
a
15 0.168
20 0.153
25 0.137
30 0.120
Table 4, new key - a It is often recommended in the UK that
Kshould be limited to 0.168 to ensure ductile
failure
Figure 5, box 2
v
Ed
= shear stress at d from face of
support
v
Ed
= design shear stress

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5, add title to x-
axis
- Percentage of tension reinforcement
(A
s,reqd
/bd)
Figure 7, heading Basic span-to-depth ratios Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios
=

) / ( .
sin .
250 1 18 0
5 0
1
ck ck
Ed
f f
v
=

) / ( .
sin .
250 1 20 0
5 0
1
ck ck
Ed
f f
v
=
cot .
ywd
w Ed sw
f d
b v
s
A
9 0
=
cot
ywd
w Ed sw
f
b v
s
A
Errata
Figure 7, Note 4
( )

+

+ =
0
0
12
5 1
11
'
'
.
ck ck
f f
K
d
l

( )

+

+ =
0
0
12
5 1
11
'
'
.
ck ck
f f
K
d
l

Figure 7, note 1 - Delete note
Figure 14 For flange in tension:
v
RD
= 0.16 f
ck
(1- f
ck
/250)
For flange in tension:
v
RD
= 0.195 f
ck
(1- f
ck
/250)
Figure 14 For flange in compression:
v
RD
= 0.195 f
ck
(1- f
ck
/250)
For flange in compression:
v
RD
= 0.160 f
ck
(1- f
ck
/250)
Table 8

v
Rd,max
(when cot = 2.5)
f
ck

Flange in
tension
Flange in
compression
20 2.94 3.59
25 3.60 4.39
28 3.98 4.85
30 4.22 5.15
32 4.46 5.44
35 4.82 5.87
40 5.38 6.55
45 5.90 7.20
50 6.40 7.80

v
Rd,max

f
ck

Flange in
tension
Flange in
compression
20 3.59 2.94
25 4.39 3.60
28 4.85 3.98
30 5.15 4.22
32 5.44 4.46
35 5.87 4.82
40 6.55 5.38
45 7.20 5.90
50 7.80 6.40
Columns
Table 3, heading - Delete:
, using method A
Figure 4 M
oE
M
oe

Page 6 A
SN
/2 = (N
Ed
- f
cd
b d
c
)/[(
sc
-
st
)
c
] A
SN
/2 = (N
Ed
- f
cd
b d
c
)/(
sc
-
st
)
Page 6 A
SN
/2 = Area of reinforcement required to
resist axial load
A
SN
= Area of reinforcement required
to resist axial load
Page 6 A
SM
/2 = [M - f
cd
b d
c
(h/2 - d
c
/2)]
[(h/2 - d
c
/2)(
sc
-
st
)
c
]
A
SM
/2 = [M - f
cd
b d
c
(h/2 - d
c
/2)]
[(h/2 - d
c
/2)(
sc
-
st
)]
Page 6 A
SM
/2 = Area of reinforcement required to
resist axial load
A
SM
= Area of reinforcement required
to resist axial load
Page 8 spacing requirements for
columns
- Add to final paragraph:
No bar should be further than
150 mm from transverse
reinforcement (links) in the
compression zone
Foundations
Table 4, row 3 1.0 G
k
1.1 G
k

Errata
Flat slabs
Table 3, Note 4 Based on 15% redistribution at supports
and no decrease in span moments
Based on 20% redistribution at
supports and no decrease in span
moments

% redistribution K
0 0.205
5 0.193
10 0.180
15 0.166
20 0.151
25 0.136

% redistribution K
0 0.208
a
10 0.182
a
15 0.168
20 0.153
25 0.137
30 0.120
Table 4, new key - a It is often recommended in the UK
that Kshould be limited to 0.168 to
ensure ductile failure
Figure 3, box 4 from top of
diagram
Where the slab span exceeds 7 m and it
supports brittle partitions, F2 = 7/l
eff

Otherwise F2 = 1.0
Where the slab span exceeds 8.5 m
and it supports brittle partitions, F2
= 8.5/l
eff

Otherwise F2 = 1.0
Figure 4, Note 3
( )

+

+ =
0
0
12
5 1
11
'
'
.
ck ck
f f
K
d
l

( )

+

+ =
0
0
12
5 1
11
'
'
.
ck ck
f f
K
d
l

Page 6, Minimum areas of
reinforcement
1.5 A
sw,min
/ (s
r
s
t
) 0.08 f
ck
1/2

f
yk
1.5 A
sw,min
/ (s
r
s
t
) 0.08 f
ck
1/2

/f
yk

Table 7

f
ck
v
rd,max

20 3.31
25 4.05
28 4.48
30 4.75
32 5.02
35 5.42
40 6.05
45 6.64
50 7.20

f
ck
v
rd,max

20 3.68
25 4.50
28 4.97
30 5.28
32 5.58
35 6.02
40 6.72
45 7.38
50 8.00

Deflection calculations
Figure 5, box 5, item 2 (200 MPa) (200 GPa)

11
11. BS 8500 for building structures
Introduction
BS 8500 Concrete Complementary British Standard to BS EN 2061
1
was revised
in December 2006 principally to reflect changes to Special Digest 1
2
and bring it
into line with other standards.
The guidelines given in BS 8500 for durability are based on the latest research
and recommends strength, cover, cement content and water/cement ratios for
various exposure conditions.
Concrete design information
Exposure classification
Initially the relevant exposure condition(s) should be identified. In BS 8500
exposure classification is related to the deterioration processes of carbonation,
ingress of chlorides, chemical attack from aggressive ground and freeze/thaw
(see Table 1). All of these deterioration processes are sub-divided. The
recommendations for XD and XS exposure classes are sufficient for exposure
class XC and it is only necessary to check each face of the concrete element
for either XC, XD or XS exposure class.
Selecting concrete strength and cover
Having identified the relevant exposure condition(s), a recommended strength
class and cover should be chosen. Table 2 indicates the minimum cover and
strengths required to meet common exposure conditions for a 50-year working
life; further explanation is given below. Table 2 is not intended to cover all
concrete exposure situations and reference should be made to BS 8500 for
those cases not included, and where a 100-year working life is required.
Compressive strength
BS 8500 uses compressive strength class to define concrete strengths; the
notation used gives the cylinder strength as well as the cube strength (see
Table 3). It is important to quote the compressive strength class in full to
avoid confusion.
Cover to reinforcement
The durability guidance given in BS 8500 is based on the assumption that the
minimum cover for durability is achieved. An allowance should be made in the
design for deviations from the minimum cover (c
dev
). This should be added to
the minimum cover to obtain the nominal cover.
T A Harrison BSc, PhD, CEng, MICE, FICT O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
Continues page 4
12379 How to BS 8500 building structures.qxd 26/11/07 10:49 Page 1
R S Narayanan ?K>g`
Ahpmh=^lb`g<hg\k^m^
from The Concrete
How to design
concrete structures
using Eurocode 2
(Ref. CCIP006)
T A Harrison BSc, PhD, CEng, MICE, FICT O Brooker BEng, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
Table 1
Exposure Classes
Class
X0
XC1
XC2
XC3 &
XC4
XD1
XD2
XD3
XS1
XS2
XS3
XF1
XF2
XF3
XF4
Class description
For concrete without reinforcement or
embedded metal where there is no significant
freeze/thaw, abrasion or chemical attack.
Dry or permanently wet.
Wet, rarely dry.
Moderate humidity or cyclic wet and dry.
Moderate humidity.
Wet, rarely dry.
Cyclic wet and dry.
Exposed to airborne salt but not in direct
contact with sea water.
Permanently submerged.
Tidal, splash and spray zones.
Moderate water saturation without
de-icing agent.
Moderate water saturation with de-icing agent.
High water saturation without de-icing agent.
High water saturation with de-icing agent
or sea water
d
.
Informative example applicable to the United Kingdom
Unreinforced concrete surfaces inside structures. Unreinforced concrete completely buried in soil
classed as AC-1 and with hydraulic gradiant not greater than 5. Unreinforced concrete permanently
submerged in non-aggressive water. Unreinforced concrete in cyclic wet and dry conditions not
subject to abrasion, freezing or chemical attack.
NOTE: For reinforced concrete, use at least XC1.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces inside enclosed structures except areas of structures
with high humidity. Reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces permanently submerged in
non-aggressive water.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete completely buried in soil classed as AC-1 and with a hydraulic
gradient not greater than 5. For other situations see chemical attack section below.
External reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces sheltered from, or exposed to, direct rain.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces inside structures with high humidity (e.g. poorly
ventilated, bathrooms, kitchens). Reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces exposed to alternate
wetting and drying.
Concrete surfaces exposed to airborne chlorides. Parts of structures exposed to occasional or slight
chloride conditions.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces totally immersed in water containing chlorides
b
.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces directly affected by de-icing salts or spray containing
de-icing salts (e.g. walls; abutments and columns within 10 m of the carriageway; parapet edge
beams and buried structures less than 1 m below carriageway level, pavements and car park slabs).
External reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces in coastal areas.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete completely submerged and remaining saturated,
e.g. concrete below mid-tide level
b
.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete surfaces in the upper tidal zones and the splash and
spray zones
c
.
Vertical concrete surfaces such as facades and columns exposed to rain and freezing. Non-vertical
concrete surfaces not highly saturated, but exposed to freezing and to rain or water.
Elements such as parts of bridges, which would otherwise be classified as XF1 but which are
exposed to de-icing salts either directly or as spray or run-off.
Horizontal concrete surfaces, such as parts of buildings, where water accumulates and which are
exposed to freezing. Elements subjected to frequent splashing with water and exposed to freezing.
Horizontal concrete surfaces, such as roads and pavements, exposed to freezing and to de-icing
salts either directly or as spray or run-off. Elements subjected to frequent splashing with water
containing de-icing agents and exposed to freezing.
a The moisture condition relates to that in the concrete cover to reinforcement or other embedded
metal but, in many cases, conditions in the concrete cover can be taken as being that of the
surrounding environment. This might not be the case if there is a barrier between the concrete and
its environment.
b Reinforced and prestressed concrete elements, where one surface is immersed in water containing
chlorides and another is exposed to air, are potentially a more severe condition, especially where the
dry side is at a high ambient temperature. Specialist advice should be sought where necessary, to
develop a specification that is appropriate to the actual conditions likely to be encountered.
c Exposure XS3 covers a range of conditions. The most extreme conditions are in the spray zone. The
least extreme is in the tidal zone where conditions can be similar to those in XS2. The
recommendations given take into account the most extreme UK conditions within this class.
d It is not normally necessary to classify in the XF4 exposure class those parts of structures located in
the United Kingdom which are in frequent contact with the sea.
2
Corrosion induced by carbonation (XC classes)
a
(Where concrete containing reinforcement or other embedded metal is exposed to air and moisture.)
Corrosion induced by chlorides other than from sea water (XD classes)
a
(Where concrete containing reinforcement or other embedded metal is subject to contact with water containing chlorides, including de-icing salts,
from sources other than from sea water.)
Corrosion induced by chlorides from sea water (XS classes)
a
(Where concrete containing reinforcement or other embedded metal is subject to contact with chlorides from sea water or air carrying salt originating from sea water.)
Freeze/thaw attack (XF classes)
(Where concrete is exposed to significant attack from freeze/thaw cycles whilst wet.)
Chemical attack (ACEC classes)
(Where concrete is exposed to chemical attack.) Note: BS 8500-1 refers to ACEC classes rather than XA classes used in BS EN 206-1
No risk of corrosion or attack (XO class)
Key
3
Table 2
Selected
a
combination
designations
b
d
15 +Dc
dev
20 +Dc
dev
25 +Dc
dev
30 +Dc
dev
35 +Dc
dev
40 +Dc
dev
45 +Dc
dev
50 +Dc
dev
Strength class
c
content (kg/m
3
Internal mass
concrete
Internal elements
(except humid
locations)
Buried concrete
in AC-1 ground
conditions
e
Vertical surface
protected from
direct rainfall
Exposed vertical
surfaces
Exposed horizontal
surfaces
Elements subject
to airborne
chlorides
Car park decks and
areas subject to
de-icing spray
Vertical elements
subject to de-icing
spray and freezing
Car park decks,
ramps and external
areas subject to
freezing and
de-icing salts
Exposed vertical
surfaces near coast
Exposed horizontal
surfaces near coast
X0
___
XC1
XC2
XC3
&
XC4
XD1
f
XD3
f
XS1
f
___
AC-1
___
XF1
XF3
___
___
XF2
XF4
XF4 (air
entrained)
XF3 or
XF4
XF1
XF3 (air
entrained)
All
All
All
All except
IVB-V
All except
IVB-V
All except
IVB-V
All except
IVB-V
All
IIB-V, IIIA
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIIB, IVB-V
IIB-V, IIIA
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIIB, IVB-V
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIB-V, IIIA, IIIB
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
IIB-V, IIIA
IIIB
CEM I, IIA,
IIB-S, SRPC
C20/25,
0.70, 240 or
RC20/25
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
___
C40/50,
0.45, 340 or
RC40/50
C40/50,
0.45, 340 or
RC40/50
C40/50,0.45,
340
g
or
RC40/50XF
g
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
C25/30,
0.65, 260 or
RC25/30
C30/37,
0.55, 300
or RC30/37
C30/37,
0.55, 300
or RC30/37
<<<
C30/37,
0.55, 300
plus air
g,h
C40/50,
0.45, 360
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
<<<
<<<
C28/35,
0.60, 280 or
RC28/35
C28/35,
0.60, 280 or
RC28/35
<<<
C28/35,
0.60, 280
plus air
g,h
or PAV2
C32/40,
0.55, 320
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
See
BS 8500
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
<<<
<<<
C25/30,
0.65, 260 or
RC25/30
<<<
<<<
C25/30,
0.60, 280
plus air
g, h, j
or PAV1
C28/35,
0.60, 300
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C25/30,
0.50, 340
C40/50,
0.45, 360
g
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C35/45,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
C35/45,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C32/40,
0.40, 380
See
BS 8500
C28/35,
0.40, 380
g, h
C32/40,
0.50, 340
C28/35,
0.50, 340
C25/30,
0.50, 340
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
C28/35,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
C32/40
0.45, 360
C40/50,
0.40, 380
g
C28/35
0.45, 360
g, h
<<<
C28/35,
0.55, 320
C25/30,
0.55, 320
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
C28/35,
0.50, 340
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C25/30,
0.50, 340
C32/40,
0.50, 340
C35/45,
0.45, 360
C32/40,
0.50, 340
<<<
C28/35,
0.50, 340
g, h
<<<
<<<
<<<
<<<
___
Not recommended
Key
d Dc
dev
severe abrasion.
___
Broad
designation
b
CEM I
SRPC
IIA
IIB-S
IIB-V
IIB+SR
IIIA
d, e
IIIA+SR
e
IIIB
e, g
IIIB+SR
e
IVB-V
Composition
Portland cement
Sulfate-resisting Portland cement
Portland cement with 620% of fly
ash, ground granulated blastfurnace
slag, limestone, or 610% silica
fume
c
Portland cement with 2135%
ground granulated blastfurnace slag
Portland cement with 2535% fly ash
with additional requirements that
enhance sulfate resistance
with additional requirements that
enhance sulfate resistance
Cement/combination
types (BS 8500)
CEM I
SRPC
CEM II/A-L, CEM II/A-LL,
CIIA-L, CIIA-LL,
CEM II/A-S, CIIA-S
CEM II/A-V, CIIA-V
CEM II/AD
CEM II/B-S, CIIB-S
CEM II/B-V, CIIB-V
CEM II/B-V+SR,
CIIB-V+SR
CEM III/A
,
, CIIIA
CEM III/A+SR
f
,
CIII/A+SR
f
CEM III/B, CIIIB
CEM III/B+SR
f
, CIIIB+SR
f
CEM IV/B(V), CIVB
Table 4
Cement and combination type
a
4
Air content
Where air entrainment is required for exposure classes XF3 and XF4
the minimum air content by volume of 3.0%, 3.5% or 5.5% should
be specified for 40 mm, 20 mm and 10 mm maximum aggregate size
respectively.
Freeze/thaw aggregates
For exposure conditions XF3 and XF4 freeze/thaw resisting
aggregates should be specified. The producer is then obliged to
conform to the requirements given in BS 85002: 2006, Cl.4.3.
Aggressive ground
Where plain or reinforced concrete is in contact with the ground
further checks are required to ensure durability. An aggressive
chemical environment for concrete class (ACEC class) should be
assessed for the site. BRE Special Digest 1
2
gives guidance on the
assessment of the ACEC class and this is normally carried out as part
of the interpretive reporting for a ground investigation. Knowing the
ACEC class, a design chemical class (DC class) can be obtained from
Table 5.
For designated concretes, an appropriate foundation concrete (FND
designation) can be selected using Table 6; the cover should be
determined from Table 2 for the applicable exposure classes. A FND
concrete has the strength class of C25/30, therefore, where a higher
strength is required a designed concrete should be specified. For
designed concretes, the concrete producer should be advised of the
DC-class (see section on specification).
C20/25 RC20/25 C25
C25/30 RC25/30 C30
C28/35 RC28/35 C35
C30/37 RC30/37
C32/40 RC32/40 C40
C35/45 RC35/45 C45
C40/50 RC40/50 C50
C45/55
C50/60 C60
NOTE: Refer to BS 8500-1: 2006, Table A.20 for full list of Compressive strength classes.
Table 3
Compressive strength class for normal and heavyweight concrete
Key
a There are a number of cements and combinations not listed in this table that may be specified for
certain specialist applications. See BRE Special Digest 1
2
. for the sulfate-resisting characteristics of other
cements and combinations.
b The use of these broad designations is sufficient for most applications. Where a more limited range of
cement or combinations types is required, select from the notations given in BS 8500-2:2006, Table 1.
c When IIA or IIA-D is specified, CEM I and silica fume may be combined in the concrete mixer using the
k-value concept; see BS EN 206-1:200, 5.2.5.2.3.
d Where IIIA is specified, IIIA+SR may be used.
e Inclusive of low early strength option (see BS EN 197-4 and the L classes in BS 8500-2:2006, Table A.1.).
f +SR indicates additional restrictions related to sulfate resistance. See BS 8500-2:2006, Table 1,
footnote D.
g Where IIIB is specified, IIIB+SR may be used.
Explanation of the compressive strength class notation
A Includes heavyweight concrete
B Minimum characteristic 150 mm
diameter by 300 mm cylinder
strength, N/mm2
C Minimum characteristic cube
strength, N/mm2
Example Compressive Designated Previous Grade
strength classes concrete of concrete
(BS 8500) (BS 8500) (BS 5328
3
& BS 8110
5
)
C 40/50
C for normal
weight
concrete
A
LC for
lightweight
concrete
Cylinder
strength
B
Cube
strength
C
Eurocode 2
4
recommends that c
dev
is taken as 10 mm, unless the
fabrication is subjected to a quality assurance system where it is
permitted to reduce c
dev
to 5 mm, or 0 mm if the element can be
rejected if it is out of tolerance (e.g. precast elements).
Cement types and minimum cement content
Table 4 may be used to understand the cement/combination
designations. It should be noted from Table 2 that the strength,
water/cement ratio and minimum cement content may vary depending
on the cement type used. In the UK, all cement/combinations are
available (except SRPC), although in most concrete production plants
either ground granulated blastfurnace slag or flyash (pfa) is available; not
both. When using a designated concrete (see section below), it is not
necessary to specify the types of cement/combinations.
5
Fire design
Having selected concrete cover and strength to meet the durability
recommendations of BS 8500, the nominal cover should be checked
in accordance with Eurocode 2
4
, for fire cover.
Concrete cast against uneven surfaces
The nominal cover (i.e. minimum cover plus fixing tolerance) should
be a minimum of 75 mm for concrete cast directly against the earth
and 50 mm for concrete cast against blinding.
Abrasion
BS 8500 does not contain abrasion classes; instead reference should be
made to BS 8204-2
6
or Concrete Society Technical Report 34
7
. Table 7
summarises the factors that affect the abrasion resistance of floors.
Specification
Method of specifying
There are various methods of specifying concrete to BS 8500
(see Table 8). The most popular are designated and designed.
BS 8500 also introduces a new method proprietary concrete.
The specifier
Figures 1 and 2 show standard specification forms produced by the
Quarry Products Association for designated and designed concretes
8
.
Similar tables are included in the National Structural Concrete
Specification
9
(NSCS). In BS 8500 the specifier is the person or body
responsible for the final compilation of the technical requirements,
called the specification, which is passed to the concrete producer.
This will generally be the contractor, however, the designer will want
to ensure their requirements are incorporated and this will normally
be through their own specification for the works (e.g. with the
NSCS). Figures 1 and 2 have been annotated to indicate which
information is typically provided by the designer and contractor. The
designer should require that any reported non-conformities are
passed to them for assessment.
Consistence
The term workability has been replaced by the term consistence and a
series of consistence classes has been introduced. Table 9 gives the
slump and flow classes and the likely target slump/flow.
Chloride Class
Concrete that is to be prestressed, pre-tensioned or heat cured
should normally be specified as chloride class Cl0,10. Reinforced
concrete should be specified as class Cl0,40 except for concrete
made with cement conforming to BS 4027
10
(SRPC), which should be
specified as class Cl0,20. Post-tensioned elements in an internal
building environment may also be specifed as class Cl0,10.
Continues page 8
AC-1s, AC-1 DC-1 DC-1
AC-2s, AC-Z DC-2 DC-2
AC-2z DC-2z DC-2z
AC-3s DC-3 DC-3
AC-3z DC-3z DC-3z
AC-3 DC-3 Refer to BS 8500
AC-4s DC-4 DC-4
AC-4z DC-4z DC-4z
AC-4 DC-4 Refer to BS 8500
AC-4ms DC-4m DC4m
AC-4m DC-4m Refer to BS 8500
AC-5 DC-4
f
DC-4
f
AC-5z DC-4z
f
DC-4z/1
f
AC-5m DC-4m
f
DC-4m
f
Key
a Where the hydrostatic head of groundwater is greater than five times the section width, refer to BS 8500.
b For guidance on precast products see Special Digest 1
2
.
c For structural performance outside these values refer to BS 8500.
d For section widths < 140 mm refer to BS 8500.
e Where any surface attack is not acceptable e.g. with friction piles, refer to BS 8500.
f This should include APM3 (surface protection), where practicable, as one of the APMs; refer to BS 8500.
Table 5
Selection of the DC-class and the number of Addition Protection
Measures (APMs) where the hydrostatic head of groundwater is not more
than five times the section width
a, b, c, d, e
ACEC-class
(Aggressive
Chemical
Environment for
Concrete class)
DC-class
Intended working life
At least 100 years At least 50 years
DC-1 RC 25/30
DC-2 FND2
DC-2z FND2z
DC-3 FND3
DC-3z FND3z
DC-4 FND4
DC-4z FND4z
DC-4m FND4m
NOTE
Strength class for all FND concrete is C25/30.
Table 6
Guidance on selecting designated concrete for reinforced concrete
foundations
DC-Class Appropriate Designated Concrete
6
Factor Effect
Power floating Power finishing and, in particular, repeated power trowelling is a significant factor in creating abrasion
resistance, however, excessive repetitions of the process do not necessarily further enhance performance.
Curing Prompt and efficient curing is essential in order to retain sufficient water in the surface zone to complete
hydration and the development of concrete strength at and close to the surface.
Cement content Cement content should not be less than 325 kg/m
3
. Cement contents above 360 kg/m
3
are unlikely to
enhance abrasion resistance and excessive cement content can impair the power finishing process.
Water/cement ratio Water/cement ratio is of great importance. It should not exceed 0.55. Reducing to 0.50 is likely to increase
abrasion resistance but lowering further is unlikely to give further enhancement.
Aggregates Coarse aggregate usually has no direct effect on abrasion resistance, except in floors in very aggressive
environments where the surface is expected to be worn away. Coarse and fine aggregates should not contain
soft or friable materials.
Dry shake finishes Dry shake finishes can be used to enhance the surface properties in high abrasion locations.
Table 7
Factors affecting the abrasion resistance of concrete floors
BS 8500-1 reference
4.2.2a)
4.2.2b)
4.2.2c)
4.2.2d)
4.2.3
Exchange of information
BS EN 206-1, 7.1
5.1a)
5.1b)
5.1 & BS EN 206-1, 7.1
5.2 & BS EN 206-1, 7.2
Requirement
Concrete designation
Maximum aggregate size when other
than 20 mm
Consistence
(Ring the class required when other than
the default classes of S3 for the GEN, FND
and RC series and S2 for the PAV series. Use
a separate column for different consistence
with the same designated concrete)
Other (specify)
Additional requirements
Total volume required
Anticipated peak delivery rate
Any access limitations
Intended method of placing,
e.g. pumping, and finishing, e.g. power
floating, the concrete
Where identity testing is routine:
Type of test
Volume of concrete in assessment
Number of tests on this volume
Whether a non-accredited laboratory
will be used
Other information from the specifier
to the producer
Information required from
the producer
Schedule
FND2z
S1, S2, S3, S4

F2, F3, F4, F5
48 m
3
6 m
3
/day
Skip +
tamped
N/A
RC25/30
S1, S2, S3, S4

F2, F3, F4, F5
1200 m
3
18 m
3
/hr
Pumping
+ float
N/A
RC32/40
10
S1, S2, S3, S4
F2, F3, F4, F5
72 m
3
6 m
3
/day
Skip +
tamped
N/A
S1, S2, S3, S4

F2, F3, F4, F5
Schedule for the specification requirements of designated concretes for use on contract
Contract Title: New Office
Contract period: June - Dec 04
Figure 1
Example specification of Designated Concrete
A There is no need to cite BS EN 206-1 as BS 8500-2 has a clause that requires conformity to BS EN 206-1.
D
D
D C
C
C
C
C
C
C
D
D
D C
C
C
C
C
C
C
O
The concretes below shall be supplied as Designated Concretes in accordance with
this specification and the relevant clauses of BS 8500-2
A
Designer specifies
concrete designation,
maximum aggregate
size and any
additional
requirements
Contractor specifies
consistence, any
additional
requirements and
completes exchange
of information
section
Red text
Example
specification
KEY
D
C
7
Figure 2
Example specification of Designed Concrete
Table 8
Methods of specifying concrete
BS 8500-1
reference
4.3.2a)
4.3.2b)
4.3.2c)
4.3.2d) &
4.3.3a)
4.3.2e)
4.3.2f)
4.3.2g) & h)
4.3.2i)
4.3.2
Note 2
4.3.3b)
to n)
BS EN
206-1, 7.1
5.1a)
5.1b)
5.1 & BS EN
206-1, 7.1
5.2 & BS EN
206-
1, 7.2
Requirement
Concrete reference, if any
Compressive strength class
For sulfate resisting concrete, design chemical class
For other concretes, limiting values of composition:
Maximum w/c ratio
Minimum cement/combination content, kg/m
3
Cement or combination types
(delete those not permitted)
Other special property, e.g. white, low heat, +SR
(specify)
Maximum aggregate size, mm
Chloride class (ring the one required)
Prestressed or heat cured reinforced concrete
Reinforced
B
Unreinforced with no embedded metal
For lightweight and heavyweight concrete,
target density
Consistence (Ring the class required.
Use separate columns for the same basic
concretes with different consistence)
Other (specify)
UKAS or equivalent accredited third party product
conformity certification (delete if not required)
Additional requirements
Volume required
Anticipated peak delivery rate
Any access limitations
Intended method of placing, e.g. pumping, and
finishing, e.g. power floating, the concrete
Where identity testing is routine:
Type of test
Volume of concrete in assessment
Number of tests on this volume
Whether a non-accredited laboratory will be used
Other information from the specifier to the
producer
Information required from the producer
Schedule
Pads
C28/35
DC-
2z
CEM 1, SRPC,
IIA, IIB
IIIA, IIIB, IVB
20
Cl 0,10
RC
Cl 1,0
S1, S2, S3, S4
F2, F3, F4, F5
Yes
48 m
3
6 m
3
/day
Skip +
tamped
N/A
Slab
C25/30
DC-
0.70
240
CEM 1, SRPC,
IIA, IIB
IIIA, IIIB, IVB
20
Cl 0,10
RC
Cl 1,0
S1, S2, S3, S4
F2, F3, F4, F5
Yes
1200 m
3
18 m
3
/hr
Pumping
+ float
N/A
Cols
C32/40
DC-
0.55
300
CEM 1, SRPC,
IIA, IIB
IIIA, IIIB, IVB
10
Cl 0,10
RC
Cl 1,0
S1, S2, S3, S4
F2, F3, F4, F5
Yes
72 m
3
6 m
3
/day
Skip +
tamped
N/A
DC-
CEM 1, SRPC,
IIA, IIB
IIIA, IIIB, IVB
Cl 0,10
RC
Cl 1,0
S1, S2, S3, S4
F2, F3, F4, F5
Yes
Schedule for the specification requirements of designed concretes for use on contract
Contract Title: New Office
Contract period: June - Dec 04
The concretes below shall be supplied as designed concretes in accordance with this specification
and the relevant clauses of BS 8500-2
A
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
D C
C
C
C
C
C
A There is no need to cite BS EN 206-1 as BS 8500-2 has a clause that requires conformity to BS EN 206-1.
B Where RC is ringed, the chloride class shall be Cl 0.40 except where SRPC is used. In this case the chloride class shall be Cl 0,20.
O
OOO
O
x x x x
O
BS 8500 BS 5328 (superseded by BS 8500 1 Dec 2003)
Designated concrete Designated mix
Designed concrete Designed mix
Prescribed concrete Prescribed mix
Standardized prescribed concrete Standard mix
Proprietary concrete No equivalent
Designer specifies
compressive strength
class, design chemical
class, maximum
water/cement ratio,
minimum cement
content, cement or
combination types
(unless design
chemical class is
specified), maximum
aggregate size,
chloride class, target
density (excluding
normal weight
concrete),
requirement for
third party product
conformity
certification
(recommended)
and any additional
requirements
Contractor specifies
consistence,
any additional
requirements and
completes exchange
of information
section
Red text
Example
Specification
KEY
D
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
D C
C
C
C
C
C
Conformity
Under BS 8500, the concrete producer is now required to follow a
formal procedure called conformity to verify that the concrete is in
accordance with the specification. It is, therefore, recommended
that the concrete supplier should have third party certification.
Where this is not adopted, the specifier is advised to adopt
adequate identity testing to ensure the concrete is as specified.
Identity testing
The specifier is responsible for organising any identity testing, which
is in all but in name acceptance testing. Identity testing can include
strength, consistence and air content. There are a number of
situations where it is recommended:
where the producer does not hold third party certification
in cases of doubt
for critical elements, e.g. high strength columns
for spot checks on the producer.
To enable the concrete producer to design and produce a suitable
concrete, certain information must be provided in addition to the
specification, e.g. where the concrete needs to be pumped or a high
quality finish is required.
References
1 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8500: Concrete Complementary British Standard to BS EN 2061. BS1, 2006.
2 BUILDING RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT. BRE Special Digest 1 Concrete in aggressive ground (3rd edition). BRE, 2005.
3 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 5328: Concrete, BSI. (Withdrawn by BSI on 1 December 2003).
5 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8110-1: The structural use of concrete Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction. BSI, 1997.
6 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 8204-2: Screeds, bases and in-situ floorings, Part 2: Concrete wearing surfaces Code of practice. BSI, 1999.
7 THE CONCRETE SOCIETY. Technical report 34: Concrete industrial ground floors. The Concrete Society, 2003.
8 QUARRY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION. Visit the Webpage www.qpa.org/pro_rea.
9 CONSTRUCT. National structural concrete specification for building construction. Construct, 2004.
10 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. BS 4027: Specification for sulfateresisting Portland cement. BSI, 1996.
Flow class Target flow (mm)
F2 380
F3 450
F4 520
F5 590
Table 9b
Consistence flow classes and likely target values
Slump class Target slump (mm)
S1 20
S2 70
S3 130
S4 190
Table 9a
Consistence slump classes and likely target values
All advice or information from The Concrete Centre is intended for use in the UK only by those who will evaluate the significance and
limitations of its contents and take responsibility for its use and application. No liability (including that for negligence) for any loss
resulting from such advice or information is accepted by The Concrete Centre or its subcontractors, suppliers or advisors. Readers should
note that publications from The Concrete Centre are subject to revision from time to time and they should therefore ensure that they
are in possession of the latest version. This publication has been produced following a contract placed by the Department for Trade
and Industry (DTI); the views expressed are not necessarily those of the DTI.
Ref: TCC/03/30
ISBN 1-904818-50-1
Published April 2007. Reprinted December 2007
First published as How to use BS 8500 with BS 8110,
March 2005
The Concrete Centre

Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel: +44 (0)1276 606800
Fax: +44 (0)1276 606801
For more information on Eurocode 2 visit
www.eurocode2.info.
For further questions relating to Eurocode 2
or the design, use and performance of
concrete, contact the free National Helpline
0845 812 0000

How To Design Concrete Structures Using Eurocode 2 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Design Concrete Structures Using Eurocode 2 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Design Concrete Structures Using Eurocode 2 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Eurocode family

This chapter shows how to use Eurocode 2

How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2

How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2

Y, M T. Designers guide to EN 1990. Thomas Telford, 2002.

and British Cement Association

Published by The Concrete Centre

The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that this

and British Cement Association

kathe| than g|v|ng a m|n|mum cove|, the ta|u|a| method

Z (see l|gu|e !) h|s |s the d|stance |om

The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that

and British Cement Association

and British Cement Association

and British Cement Association

The Eurocode is ambiguous regarding linear interpolation. It is understood that this

and British Cement Association

and British Cement Association

S1, S2, S3, S4

S1, S2, S3, S4

S1, S2, S3, S4

Published by The Concrete Centre

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.