Of Syntliesis,: Co, Ni, Cu
Of Syntliesis,: Co, Ni, Cu
Of Syntliesis,: Co, Ni, Cu
c
0
60
c
/
"5 /
~
/
e
-c
40
>
I-x-CuYSALSC I
s:
15
if' /
! ---+-- CuYMDTC !
20
V 0
2 3 4 5
Time (h)
Figure 8. 2 Effect of reaction time on conversion of phenol to
hydroquinone
Reaction condition
Volume of phenol :1 ml
Volume ofH
202
:5 ml
Volume of solvent (H
20)
:5 ml
Weight of catalysts :50 mg
Temperature :30 QC
.'
" ,
j.)
i :::
\:.
.~
.,
-e-,
. ~ : .'"
199
The percentage conversion to hydroquinone is given in Table 7. 2, and the graph
showing the percentage of hydroquinone formed with time is presented in Figure
7.2. The percentage conversion of phenol to hydroquinone increased with time.
After one hour there was a sharp increase in the percentage conversion of phenol.
In the case of CuYMDTC, 99 % conversion with 100 % selectivity was
obtained within two hours. The reaction was continued for five hours and the
products were analyzed at the end of each hour. Tarry products were obtained at
the end of 5 hours. The darkening of the solution with time indicates tar
formation. CuYSALSC took 5 hours for 99 % conversion with 100 % selectivity.
Tarry products were formed after 5 hours. The optimum time for the reaction
using CuYMDTC was taken as 2 hours. and for the reaction using CuYSALSC it
was taken as 5 hours. After an optimum time of reaction, only tarry products are
formed.
8.3.3.2. Influence of the amount of catalyst
The progress of the reaction was studied by varying the amount of catalyst
from 20 mg to 50mg. The results are presented in Table 8.3, and Figure 8. 3 give
the percentage conversion of phenol to hydroquinone against varying amounts of
catalyst. It can be seen that the percentage conversion to hydroquinone increases
with increase in the amount of the catalyst. In the case of CuYMDTC. the
maximum conversion was obtained with 30 mg of catalyst while in the case of
CuYSALSC maximum conversion with 100 % selectivity was reached with 40
mg of catalyst. Further increase in the weight of the catalyst had no effect on the
oxidation of phenol to hydroquinone.
200
Table 8.3 Effect of the amount of the catalyst on the conversion of phenol to
hydroquinone
Weight of CuYSALSC CuYMDTC
catalyst
% % % % Hydroquinone
(mg)
Conversion Hydroquinone Conversion
20 4 0 50 55
30 33 31 99 99
40 99 99 99 99
50 99 99 99 99
100
/1
I!I
80
60
~ o
40
20
/ -D-CuYMDTC
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 so
weight of catalyst (mg)
Figure 8.3 Effect of the amount of the catalyst on the conversion of phenol to
hydroquinone
Reaction condition
Volume of phenol :1 ml
Volume ofH
202
:5 ml
Volume of solvent (H
20)
:5 ml
Temperature :30 QC
Duration
CuYSALSC : 5 h
CuYMDTC : 2 h
201
8.3.3.3. Influence of H,O,: phenol (oxidant/substrate) ratio
The reactions were carried out under identical conditions but by varying
the volume of hydrogen peroxide. The results showing the dependence of
percentage conversion to hydroquinone on the volume of H
2
0
2
are given in Table
8.4. The reaction conditions are also given in the table. From the table it is seen
that percentage conversion increases with increase in the volume of H
2
0
2
{keeping the volume of phenol constant (lm!.)} to a certain point, and thereafter
an increase in the volume ofH
2
0
2leads
to the production of tarry products.
Table 8.4 Effect of the amount of hydrogen peroxide on the conversion of phenol
to hydroquinone
Volume
ofH
2
0
2
CuYSALSC CuYMDTC
(ml)
4
5
6
% Conversion % Hydroquinone % Conversion % Hydroquinone
90 90 91 90
99 99 99 99
99 Tarry products 99 Tarry products
Reaction condition
Volume of phenol
Volume of solvent (H
2
0 )
Temperature
Weight of catalyst
Duration
CuYSALSC:
CuYMDTC:
:1 ml
:5 ml
:30 QC
:50mg
5 h
2h
202
8.3.3.4. Influence of solvents
The reaction was studied in different solvents like water, acetone,
methanol and benzene under similar reaction conditions. The effect of solvents on
the activity and selectivity of the catalysts is indicated in the Table 8.5.
Table 8.5 Effect of various solvents on the conversion of phenol to hydroquinone
CuYSALSC CuYMDTC
Solvents
% % % %
Conversion Hydroquinone Conversion Hydroquinone
Methanol 99 0 99 0
Benzene 99 0 99 0
Acetone 99 0 99 0
Water 99 99 99 99
Fonnalion of hydroquinone in different solvents
'00
"
.CuYSALSC
ElCuYMDTC
-------- -------
Figure 8.4 Effect of solvents on the conversion of phenol to hydroquinone
Reaction condition
Volume of phenol :1 ml
Volume ofH20z :5 ml
Volume of solvent (H20) :5 ml
203
Temperature
Weight of catalyst
Duration
CuYSALSC : 5 h
CuYMDTC : 2 h
:30 QC
:50 mg
Water was found to be the best solvent for phenol hydroxylation with 99
% conversion and 100 % selectivity towards hydroquinone. Tarry products were
formed in methanol and acetone. There was no reaction at all when benzene was
used as solvent.
8.3.3.5. Influence of reaction temperature
To study the influence of temperature on the conversion of phenol to
hydroquinone, the reaction was studied at three different temperatures, 30 QC,
50 QC, and 70 QC. The maximum conversion to hydroquinone was obtained at
room temperature (30
QC).
The yield of products in many reactions depends on
temperature. The results of the study are given in Table 8.6. With CuSALSC and
CuYMDTC, the percentage conversion to hydroquinone decreased to 0 % as
temperature was raised to 50 QC. At 70 QC, tarry products were formed with both
CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC.
Table 8.6 Effect of reaction temperature on the conversion of phenol to
hydroquinone
Temperature CuYSALSC CuYMDTC
('C)
% % % %
Conversion Hydroquinone Conversion Hydroquinone
30 99 99 99 99
50 99 0 99 0
70 99 0 99 0
204
Reaction condition
Volume of phenol
Volume ofH
2
0
z
Volume of solvent (H
2
0 )
Weight of catalyst
8.3.4. Addition of poison
:1 ml
:5 ml
:5 ml
:50mg
Duration:
CuYSALSC
CuYMDTC
:5 h
: 2 h
The poison resistance of the catalysts was studied by adding some foreign
compound to the catalyst reactant system. The effect of poison on CuYSALSC
and CuYMDTC was studied by examining the activity of the catalyst in presence
of traces of pyridine. The percentage loss in activity would indicate the extent of
deactivation on poisoning. This was carried out in two ways:
i) by directly adding pyridine to the catalyst, and
ii) by adding pyridine after adding phenol to the catalyst.
The catalysts were completely deactivated in the first case. In the second case the
two catalysts CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC were found to be resistant to the action
of poison.
8.3.5. Recycled catalyst
The reaction was carried out using used catalysts. The catalyst was filtered,
washed with acetone, and activated in the oven for two hours. This was to remove
any impurities attached to the active sites of the catalyst. X - Ray diffraction
studies of both the used catalysts (CuYMDTC and CuYSALSC) showed no loss
in crystallinity. The FTIR spectra of the used and unused catalysts were similar.
Catalytic runs were carried out under similar conditions using the recycled
catalyst. The results obtained for CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC are shown in
Figure 8.5, and the percentage conversions are given in Table 8.7. CuYSALSC
showed - 60 % activity compared to the activity with fresh sample while
CuYMDTC showed - 50%.
205
Table 8.7 Effect of recycled catalyst on the conversion of phenol to hydroquinone
Recycled
catalyst % Conversion % Hydroquinone % Loss in activity
CuYSALSC 60 60 40
CuYT\1DTC 55 51 49
CuYSALSC
49'V
'--- I I ~ ~ ~ J
Figure 8.5 Comparison ofthe activity and loss in activity of recycled catalyst
Reaction condition
Volume of phenol
Volume ofH
2
0
2
Volume of solvent (H20)
Weight of catalyst
Duration:
CuYSALSC
CuYT\1DTC
:1 m!
:5 ml
:5 ml
:50 mg
:5 h
: 2 h
206
8.4. Discussion
A comparison of the catalytic activity and selectivity of the zeolite
encapsulated SALSC, MOTC, SPO, SPP, DMG and SB complexes reveals that
CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC are the most efficient catalysts for the hydroxylation
of phenol to hydroquinone. There are reports that redox zeolites act as active
catalysts for hydrogen peroxide mediated oxidation reactions such as the
hydroxylation of phenol to the corresponding hydroxylated aromatics [3]. This
could be the result of various factors like surface area, pore volume, redox
properties of metal complexes, and the electric field gradient inside the zeolite.
Phenol hydroxylation reaction can take place at the extemal surface as well
as in the intemal pores. The reaction in the internal pores leads mainly to the
formation of hydroquinone whereas reaction on the external surface leads to the
production of catechol as well as tarry products. The formation of hydroquinone as
the only product suggests that the reaction occurs entirely inside the pores of the
zeolite. This might be due to the ligand field effect, which improves the selectivity,
and stability of the catalyst. Here the preferential formation of hydroquinone (para
isomer) is the result of product shape selectivity. Constraints imposed on the
diffusion of the products from the pores to the outside bring about enhanced para
selectivity. This is indicated in Figure 8.6.
From the percentage conversion taken as a function of the reaction time for
the two catalyst systems CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC, it is found that there is an
optimum time for maximum hydroquinone conversion. The appearance of an
induction period and the increase in the percentage conversion with time suggest
the involvement of a free radical mechanism. On carrying out the reaction for a
longer time, unwanted products were formed. The darkening of the solution with
time indicates tar formation.
207
+ H,o,
Figure 8.6 Influence of shape selectivity
The minimum amount of catalyst required for a particular reaction was
also optimized. There was no effect on increasing the weight of the catalyst above
a certain level.
The study of the effect of reaction temperature on hydroquinone
conversion shows that the maximum yield is obtained at room temperature. As
temperature increased to 50C, percentage conversion decreased. The reduction
in the percentage conversion to hydroquinone can be due to two reasons:
i) the formation of other products resulting from the slow diffusivity at
higher production ratio from the pore leading to further reaction;
ii) the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide at higher temperatures.
At 70C, tarry products are formed with both CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC. This
can be due to the exothermic nature of the reaction or due to over oxidation or due
to side reactions.
208
The study of the effect of solvents on the activity shows that water is the
best solvent for hydroquinone conversion. This is because phenol and hydrogen
peroxide can reach the active sites more easily with water than with organic
solvents. It has been reported that the activity for this reaction in water is much
higher than in any other solvent [5]. No hydroquinone conversion was observed
with methanol and acetone. This can be due to the radical scavenging property of
methanol and acetone, which removes the reactive phenol radicals. In benzene
there is no conversion at all, which might be due to the insolubility of hydrogen
peroxide in benzene.
The hydrogen peroxide phenol ratio is important in deciding the activity.
The maximum conversion to hydroquinone was obtained when the hydrogen
peroxide> phenol volume ratio was 5. Increase in the volume ofH202 beyond that
results in the production of tarry products. The formation of tarry products might
be due to over oxidation of phenol at high hydrogen peroxide concentration.
Both the catalysts were completely deactivated on adding pyridine. The
formation of catalytically inactive complex with pyridine with no vacant
coordination site might be the reason for the deactivation, which is indicated by
the colour change of the complex. However, CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC
showed no loss in activity on adding pyridine to the mixture of phenol and the
catalysts. This again suggests the possibility of the existence of phenoxide ions,
which get attached to the catalysts.
CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC can be reused after the used samples are
washed and heated (to activate the catalysts by removing the by-products
covering some active centres) [6]. The phenol conversion is in the range 50 - 60
% compared to that for the first run. This again confirms that the complex inside
the zeolite pore is stable. The reaction of metal complexes with peroxides is
important in organic synthesis since peroxides are useful forms of "active
209
oxygen" reagents for oxidative transformation [7]. Many possible mechanisms
have been suggested for phenol hydroxylation. As zeolite encapsulated complexes
are heterogenised homogeneous catalysts, the hydroxylation of phenol can be
assumed to follow a heterogeneous - homogeneous reaction mechanism [8-9].
The high susceptibility of the aromatic ring of phenols towards oxidation
can be due to the generation of the phenoxy radical via proton removal. The
generation of phenoxy radical may occur on the catalyst surface. There have been
reports of proton transfer from phenol to a potential active site prior to
hydroxylation during enzyme catalysis of phenol using phenol hydroxylase.
The mechanism involving homolytic hydroxyl radical pathway and
heterolytic pathway involving HjOt ion is presented in Scheme I and Scheme n
[10]. The first step in both the schemes involves the reaction between phenol and
the complex, in which an electron is transferred to the metal ion. This results in
the formation of phenoxy radical on the catalyst surface. At the same time the
catalytic surface can trigger the homolytic cleavage of hydrogen peroxide, or form
the very reactive species Hj 0
2
+, the acidic sites of zeolite providing the acidity
requirements for the formation of this species. The formation of catechol and
hydroquinone is believed to be the result of the attack of HO, on the benzene ring
or by the attack of Hj 0
2
",
As per the inferences from our study, the mechanism occurring in this case
can be the one following Scheme Il, utilizing n,o,'. Since the catalyst support is
zeolite there is strong possibility for the formation of H]Ot. The acidity
requirements for the formation of Hj02+ may be supplied by the acid sites.
This is further supported by the fact that hydroquinone conversion is maximum at
a very high concentration of hydrogen peroxide. The presence of acid sites of
zeolite and the high concentration of hydrogen peroxide shift the above
210
equilibrium to the right. This explains the high conversion observed with high
H
20Z
/phenol ratio.
+
Cu
2
+
6
+
0"
0 0
6
6
6
1OH"
1
OH"
0 0
6:"
6
H OH
1 1
;l:;OH
i..
OH
Scheme I Mechanism of phenol hydroxylation
211
OH
6 6
+
CU
2
+ +
W
+ CU
O 0 0
6
+
H
302
+
6:H
6
H OH
1
1
OH OH
oOH
Q
OH
Scheme 11 Mechanism of phenol hydroxylation
212
References
I. P.B. Weisz and V.J. Frilette, J Phys. Chem. 64 (1960) 382.
2. P.B. Weisz, V.J. Frilette , R.W. Maatman, and E.B. Mower, J Catal. 1
(1962) 307.
3. Chandra R Jacob, Saji P. Varkey, and Paul Ratnasamy, Appl. Cata!' A. 168
(1998) 353.
4. R.F. Parton, D.E. De Vos, and P.A. Jacobs in Proceedings of the NATO
Advanced Study Institute on Zeolite Microporous Solids: Synthesis,
Structure and Reactivity, E.G. Derouane, F. Lemos, C. Naccache, and F.R.
Ribeiro (Eds.), Kluwer, Dodrecht, 555, 578, 1992.
5. Dirk E. De Vos, Mieke Dama, Bert F. Sels, and P.A. Jacobs, Chem. Rev. 102
(2002) 3615.
6. Wei Zhao, Yunfei Luo, Peng Deng, and Quanzhi Li, Catal. Left. 73, 2-4
(2001) 199.
7. Roger A. Sheldon and Jay K. Kochi, Metal- Catalyzed Oxidations of
Organic Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1981.
8. C. Meyer, G. Clement, and J.c. Balaceanu, Proc. Jrd Int. Congr. on
Catalysis, I (1965) 184.
9. A. Sadana and J.R. Katzer, J Catal. 35 (1974) 140.
10. G. Bellussi and C. Perego in Handbook ofHeterogeneous Catalysis, Vo!. 5,
G. Ertl, H. Knozinger, and J. Weitkamp (Eds.), Wiley-VCl-l, New York,
2329, 1997.
213
Chapter 9
Catalytic activity of zeolite encapsulated complexes in the
partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde
Abstract
Molecular sieves containing transition metal complexes exhibit very good properties as catalysts
for a variety of oxidation reactions with peroxide as oxidant. The partial oxidation of benzyl
alcohol using zeolite encapsulated complexes was carried out in the presence of hydrogen peroxide
as oxidant at room temperature. Benzaldehyde was the only detectable product. The influence of
various parameters such as temperature, amount of catalyst, and oxidant to substrate ratio was
studied. Significant variation was observed on changing the solvent. The effect of catalyst poison
was studied by adding pyridine. Higher activity was observed in the case of PdYDMG and
CuYSPP. The efficiency of the catalysts on recycling was also studied.
9.1. Introduction
The oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to aldehydes, ketones and
carboxylic acids is a pivotal reaction in organic syntheses [1-2]. Traditionally such
reactions have been performed with inorganic oxidants containing chromium(vI)
reagents. The emphasis in recent times is on developing recyclable catalysts to
bring about oxidation reactions using clean oxidants such as oxygen and hydrogen
peroxide, under mild conditions compared to classical oxidations. Metal
complexes have attracted attention as dioxygen activating catalysts. Per-oxo
complexes act as oxidants in different reactions [3]. Per-oxo compound are
generated by adding hydrogen peroxide to metal complexes But these
homogeneous systems have several drawbacks, as they show a tendency for self
degradation, and there is difficulty in reusing them. One means of overcoming
these problems was to encapsulate them in zeolite pores, as zeolite encapsulated
systems have the advantages of both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts.
Zeolite encapsulated per-oxo compounds provide an attractive route for the
preparation of synthetic intermediates and other oxygen-containing organic
substrates. Partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol is of great importance in the
preparation of fine chemicals. In this chapter the results of our studies on the
oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde in the presence of PdYOMG and
CuYSPP complexes as catalysts are presented.
9.2. Experimental
9.2.1. Materials
Zeolite Y encapsulated complexes ofSPO, SPP, SALSC, SB, OMG, and
MOTC were prepared and characterized. Details of all the materials used for the
activity studies are explained in Chapter 2. Neat complexes of the catalytically
active Iigands were also synthesized.
215
9.2.2. Procedure for the partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde
Benzyl alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, the activated catalyst, and the solvent
were taken in a reaction flask of 50ml capacity. The reaction mixture was stirred
for a definite period of time using a magnetic paddle. The conditions specific to
each test are indicated along with the results in the table for each reaction.
After the reaction the solution was filtered to remove the catalyst. Then the
aqueous and organic layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with
water and analysed using thin layer chromatography (TLC) to detect the formation
of benzaldehyde. It was finally analysed using gas chromatography to quantify the
amount of substrate and product. The reaction was repeated, varying parameters
like time, amount of catalyst, oxidantlsubstrate ratio, solvent, and temperature. The
poison resistance and the activity on reusing the catalyst were examined here also.
9.3. Results
9.3.1. Screening studies
The partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde was studied using
SPO, SPP, MOTC, OMG, SB and SALSC complexes in the liquid phase. The
activities corresponding to these zeolite-encapsulated complexes are gIven In
Table 9.1, and the percentage conversion to benzaldehyde for the different
complexes is shown in Figure 9.l. Of all the complexes, PdYOMG and CuYSPP
showed more than 95% conversion with 100% selectivity, while PdYSALSC
showed only 49% conversion. Conversion is represented as turnover number
(TON) calculated as moles of benzyl alcohol converted per mole of metal ion
present in the catalyst.
216
Table 9.1 Activity for benzyl alcohol oxidation
DMG
FeY
CoY
NiY
CuY
PdY
99
100
90
80
c
70 0
r! 60
CD
50 >
c
0
40
u
30
0
20
10
0
Percentage of benzaldehyde
SPP SPO SALSC MDTC
0.1 0.1 0.1
4.0 0.5
0.5
6.0
0.1 0.1
0.1
0.1
98 6.2
3.5
25
49
2.1
Conversion of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde
'-
OMG
,... ....
I511III:
: .. &lilt:[
&l1li::: 1iIIIIO[]II'
SPP SPO SALSC MOTC SB
I
Percentage of Benzaldehyde
Ligand
SB
4.0
leFeY!
I
_CoY!
,1iI NiY !
i
OCUY
,
!_PdY: I
I
,
Figure 9.1 % Conversion of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde
Reaction condition
Oxidant to substrate mole ratio: 1.5
Temperature : 30 QC
Catalyst weight : 60 mg
Solvent : water
Duration : 4 hours
217
9.3.2. Blank run
The oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde was carried out under
conditions identical to those of the screening experiments but without adding the
catalyst. Benzaldehyde was not formed. This makes it clear that hydrogen peroxide
by itself is unable to oxidize the benzyl alcohol in the absence of the catalyst. The
reactions were carried out using NaY, Cu Y and PdY. Formation of benzaldehyde
was not observed in these cases either. Experiments using neat complexes ofDMG
and SPP were also carried out. The absence of benzaldehyde in all these cases
indicated that the conversion was possible only in presence ofthe catalysts.
9.3.3. Factors influencing the partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol to
benzaldehyde
The oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde was studied under varied
conditions, and the results observed were tabulated. It is seen that PdYDMG and
Cu YSPP give good conversion for benzyl alcohol oxidation. Further studies were
done using PdYDMG and CuYSPP by varying the following parameters:
i) reaction time
ii) amount of catalyst
iii) oxidant to substrate ratio
iv) solvents
v) reaction temperature.
9.3.3.1. Effect of reaction time
The effect of reaction time was studied by carrying out the reaction for
different time intervals ranging from 1 hour to 5 hours using PdYDMG and
Cu YSPP. The percentage conversion increased with increase in time. At the end of
four hours 99% conversion was obtained with both the catalysts, with 100 %
218
selectivity to benzaldehyde. An induction time of 2 hours was observed in these
cases.
Table 9.2 Effect of reaction time on conversion of benzyl alcohol
Time PdYDMG CuYSPP
(h) % Conversion % Benzaldehyde % Conversion % Benzaldehyde
0
2 0
3 40
4 99
5 99
2
0
0
36
99
99
,
Time (h)
0
0
34
99
99
,
5
0
0
33
99
99
!OPdYDMG
ill cuYSPP
- --------- -------------- - -
Figure 9.2 Reaction time versus % conversion
Reaction condition
Oxidantfsubstrate mole ratio
Weight of catalyst
Solvent
Temperature
: 1.5
: 60mg
: water
: 30C
219
There was no change in the amount or product on carrying out the reaction
for 5 hours. The effect of contact time on conversion and selectivity is represented
in Table 9.2 and this is shown graphically in Figure 9.2.
9.3.3.2. Effect of the amount of catalyst
The reactions were carried out with PdYDMG and CuYSPP under identical
conditions by varying the amount of catalyst from 20mg to 60mg. It was found
that activity increased with increase in the amount of the catalyst. The results are
tabulated in Table 9.3 and are presented graphically in Figure 9.3. The maximum
conversion was obtained with 60mg of catalyst. So for all the reactions the amount
of the catalyst was fixed as 60mg.
100
80
c
60
:u
>
c
40
20
o
20 30 40 50 60
Weighl ot calslysl
Figure 9.3 Effect of the amount of catalyst on benzyl alcohol oxidation
Reaction condition
Oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio : 1.5
Solvent : water
Temperature : 30 QC
Duration : 4 hrs
220
Table 9.3 Effect of the amount of catalyst on benzyl alcohol oxidation
Amount of PdYDMG CuYSPP
catalyst % % % %
Conversion Benzaldehyde Conversion Benzaldehyde
20 0.1 0
40 10 15 5 10
60 99 99 99 99
9.3.3.3. Effect of oxidant: substrate ratio
The effect of oxidant: substrate ratio on benzaldehyde oxidation was studied in the
case of PdYDMG and CuYSPP. The extent of oxidation depends on the
concentration of oxidant in the reaction mixture. The reaction was repeated under
identical conditions but by varying the oxidant: substrate ratio. The percentage
conversion to benzaldehyde increased as oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio increased.
The maximum conversion was obtained at oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio 1.5. There
was no further change in conversion as the ratio was increased. So further studies
were carried out fixing the oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio at 1.5. The results are
presented in Table 9.4.
Reaction condition
Temperature
Duration
Weight of catalyst
Solvent
: 30 QC
: 4 hrs
: 60mg
: water
221
Table 9.4 Effect of varying the oxidantlsubstrate ratio on the conversion of phenol
to hydroquinone
PdYDMG CuYSPP
Solvent
% % % %
Conversion Benzaldehyde Conversion Benzaldehyde
2 0 0 0
1.5 99 99 99 99
2.5 99 99 99 99
9.3.3.4. Effect of solvents
The study of the oxidation of benzyl alcohol was carried out in two solvents.
benzene and water. The effect of solvents was studied for two catalysts. PdYDMG
and CuYSPP. The results are presented in Table 9.5 and represented pictorially in
Figure 9.4. Using water as solvent, 99% conversion was observed with 100%
selectivity to benzaldehyde. In benzene, 100% conversion of benzyl alcohol
occurred but no benzaldehyde was formed.
I
Figure 9.4 Effect of solvents on the conversion of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde
222
Table 9.5 Effect of solvent on benzyl alcohol oxidation
PdYDMG CuYSPP
Solvent % % % %
Conversion Benzaldehyde Conversion Benzaldehyde
Water
Benzene
Reaction condition
99
99
Oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio: 1.5
Temperature : 30C
Duration : 4 hrs
Weight of catalyst : 60 mg
98
o
9.3.3.5. Effect of reaction temperature
99
99
98
o
The oxidation of benzyl alcohol was carried out at three different
temperatures 30, 50
0
and 70C, using PdYDMG and CuYSPP to find the
influence of temperature on the partial oxidation reaction. The results are given in
Table 9.6 and the variation in activity with temperature is shown in Figure 9.5. All
the reactions were carried out under identical conditions except the difference in
temperature. On increasing the temperature the activity was found to decrease in
the case of both the catalysts.
Reaction condition
Oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio
Solvent
Weight of catalyst
Duration
: 1.5
: water
: 60mg
: 4 hrs
223
Table 9.6 Effect of reaction temperature on benzyl alcohol oxidation
Reaction PdYDMG CuYSPP
temperature % Conversion % Benzaldehyde % Conversion % Benzaldehyde
30C
99
50C
2
70C
100
80
c
0
60
i
40 u
.,.
20
0
98
1.2
0.6
..,...
---
30
D
e
50
D
e
Temperature
, PdYDMG
cuvspp
---
70
D
e
99
2
Cuvspp
PdYDMG
Figure 9.5 Effect of reaction temperature on benzyl alcohol oxidation
9.3.4. Addition of poison
98
1.5
0.1
The poison resistance ofPdYDMG and CuYSPP was evaluated by using pyridine.
Pyridine was added to the catalysts for poisoning them. Then the reaction was
carried out using the poisoned catalysts under identical conditions. Both the
catalysts were seen to be deactivated.
224
9.3.5. Recycled catalyst
Use of recycled catalyst is very important from the point of view of economical
considerations. The used catalyst was filtered off from the reaction mixture and
washed with acetone and dried in the oven at 120 QC for 2 hours. XRD patterns
were found to remain similar after the first run, indicating the retention of the
zeolite structure. IR spectra indicated that the complex was intact in the cages.
Pd(u) and CU(II) ions were not detected in the reaction phase of the mixture.
Therefore the Pd and Cu complexes have not leached from the zeolite pore during
the reaction. PdYDMG showed 67% activity after recycling while in the case of
Cu YSPP, there was no loss in activity on recycling. A comparison of the activities
of fresh and recycled catalysts is given in Figure 9.6 and the corresponding
conversions and percentage loss in activity are given in Table 9.7.
Table 9.7 Effect of recycled catalyst on benzyl alcohol oxidation
Catalyst % Conversion
used Before recycling After recycling % Loss in activity
PdYDMG
CuYSpp
Reaction condition
98
98
Oxidant! substrate mole ratio: 1.5
Temperature : 30 cC
Duration : 4 hrs
Solvent : water
Weight of catalyst : 60 mg
67
98
33
o
225
9.4. Discussion
PdYDMG CuYSpp
Loss in activity
[] Retained
Figure 9.6 Activity on using recycled catalysts
Zeolite encapsulated complexes of SPO, SPP, MOTC, SS, OMG and
SALSC were used in tne oxidation of benzyl alcohol. A comparison of the activity
indicates that PdYDMG and CuYSPP are the most effective catalysts for the
partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol, and there was 100% selectivity to
benzaldehyde. In terms of turn over number. the conversion for PdYDMG was
2540 and that for CuYSPP was 1682. PdYSALSC and CuYMOTC showed
moderate activity compared to PdYDMG and CuYSPP. Benzoic acid or any other
oxidation products were not detected in the reaction mixture on analysis using gas
chromatography. Thi s shows that zeolite encapsulated complexes are very
effective catalysts for the partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol, and that PdYDMG
and CuYSPP are eco-friendly catalysts in that they leave no waste products.
Similar behaviour of encapsulated complexes in the partial oxidation of benzyl
alcohol has been reported by Zsigmond [4] . The aqueous and the organic phases
were separated and the aqueous phase was tested for the presence of any metal
ions using atomic absorption spectroscopy after the screening studies. The absence
of metal ions in the solution phase indicated that no leaching of complexes had
226
occurred during the reaction. This shows that the complexes are intact inside the
zeolite pores. This explains the high stability of the complex inside the zeolite
pore.
The activities of the zeolite encapsulated catalysts were compared with
those of NaY, CuY, and PdY in partial oxidation reaction. The absence of the
oxidation product benzaldehyde with NaY indicates that the zeolite support in
itself does not ensure oxidation. Negative results with Cu Y and PdY indicate that
Cu
2
+ and Pd
2
+ ions by themselves are not able to influence benzyl alcohol
oxidation. Neat complexes of Pd(JI) and CU(JI) did not yield benzaldehyde as the
product on the oxidation of benzyl alcohol. This could be due to multi molecular
deactivation. On the other hand, zeolite encapsulated complexes showed high
activity. This can be explained by the site isolation theory. The complexes are held
within the zeolite pores by physical force. Confinement of the transition metal
complexes inside the cavities can activate the catalyst because of the strong
electrostatic interaction between the catalyst and the support. They are free to
move inside the pore but are prevented from coming out due to the restrictive size
of the pore openings. This prevents deactivation by multi molecular association. It
has been reported that a metal complex in the zeolite cage behaves like neat
complexes in solution [4].
The effect of varying the amount of the catalysts was studied. The
conversion increased with an increase in the amount of the catalyst upto a certain
limit at which maximum conversion was obtained, and further addition of catalyst
had no effect. The increase in conversion can be due to the increase in the number
of active sites.
In the case of both the catalysts, there was an induction period of 2 hours
after which the conversion to benzaldehyde slowly increased. The time required
for the completion of the reaction was 4 hours. There are reports that the oxidation
227
of benzyl alcohol is a slow process [5]. No further reaction products were observed
on continuing the reaction beyond 4 hours.
The choice of solvent was found to have a big influence on activity. Very
high activity was observed when the solvent used was water. Benzaldehyde
formation was not detected on using benzene as solvent. This can be due to the
low solubility of hydrogen peroxide in benzene.
The effect of temperature was studied, conducting the reaction at three
different temperatures, 30C, 50 C, and 70C. Conversion was maximum at room
temperature, and room temperature was taken as the optimum temperature for
benzyl alcohol oxidation. According to earlier reports, the reaction is to take place
at higher temperatures [6). In the present case, the conversion to benzaldehyde
decreased as the temperature was raised. This could be due to the decomposition
of hydrogen peroxide at higher temperatures. There is an induction period of 2
hours for this reaction. The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide must have
occurred within that time at higher temperatures.
The maximum conversion was obtained when the oxidantlsubstrate mole
ratio was 1.5. There have been reports of experiments in which the reaction was
carried out with the oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio at 2.5 [6). On adding poison to the
catalyst it was completely deactivated by the action of poison. One of the most
attractive features of zeolite encapsulated complexes is their ability to be recycled.
CuYSPP maintained the same activity after recycling, while PdYDMG showed
63% activity as compared to the fresh catalyst. This shows their tendency to
withstand the conditions of regeneration processes. The use of recycled catalyst
reduces the possibility of environmental pollution and enables the continuity of the
process.
According to the mechanism proposed by Puzari et aI., some excess
hydrogen peroxide is needed because the reaction involves the decomposition of
228
hydrogen peroxide. As per this mechanism, the catalytic oxidation of benzyl
alcohol by hydrogen peroxide involves two simultaneous processes:
decomposition of hydrogen peroxide itself resulting in the liberation of oxygen,
and the liberated oxygen reacting with benzyl alcohol [7]. In our observation, the
oxidation of benzyl alcohol takes place along a single route. Besides, the
oxidantlsubstrate mole ratio used in our method is lower than that reported earlier
[6]. The mechanism proposed here involves the interaction of the encapsulated
complex with hydrogen peroxide to form a catalyst precursor. The precursor is
formed by the coordination of an oxygen atom to the vacant metal site in the
complex. The catalyst precursor interacts with benzyl alcohol oxidizing it to
benzaldehyde. Similar mechanisms have been reported earlier [8-10].
Catalyst precursor
Catalyst
Scheme I Oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde
PdYDMG and CuYSPP, which were found effective in the oxidation of
benzyl alcohol, have square planar geometry. So there is enough space around the
metal for the coordination of one or more ligand. The precursor is formed by the
coordination of an oxygen atom to the vacant metal site in the complex.
The use of encapsulated systems has certain advantages over the use of
homogeneous systems. It is very easy to separate the encapsulated catalyst from
the reaction medium by simple filtration. Even the used catalyst showed high
activity while the free complex had no activity. Further, there is no need to use an
extra axial ligand as in the case of the homogeneous catalyst [4]. The other
advantages were the possibility of recycling and amenability to continuous
processing.
229
References
1. M. Hudlicky, Oxidations in Organic Chemistry, American Chemical
Society, Washington DC, 1990.
2. R.A. Sheldon, I.W.C.E. Arends, Gerd-Jan T. Brink, and A. Duksman, Acc.
Chem. Res. 35 (2002) 774.
3. Won K. Seok, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 20,4 (1999) 395.
4. A. Zsigmond, F. Notheisz, Z. Frater, and J. E. Backvall, in Heterogeneous
Catalysis and Fine Chemicals IV, H.U. Blaser, A. Baiker, and R. Pr ins
(Eds.) Elsevier Science B.Y. (1997) 453.
5. L. Palombi, L. Arista, A. Lattanzi, F. Bonadies, and A. Scettri,
Tetrahedron Lett. 37,43 (1996) 7849.
6. K.O. Xavier, J. Chacko, and K.K. Mohammed Yusuff, J Mol. Catal. 178,
(2002) 275.
7. A. Puzari, L. Nath, and Jubaraj B. Baruah, Ind. J Chem. 37 A (1998) 723.
8. R. A. Sheldon and J.K. Kochi, Metal Cata(vzed Oxidation of Organic
Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1981.
9. Y. Kamiya and M. Kashima, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 46 (1974) 905.
10. A. Onopchencko and J.G.D. Schultz, J Org. Chem. 37 (1972) 2564.
230
Summary and conclusion
With increasing awareness about the dangers of environmental degradation,
research in chemistry is getting increasingly geared to the development of "green
chemistry," by designing environmentally friendly products and processes that
bring down the generation and use of hazardous substances. The priority in many
chemical processes now is to develop new solid catalysts with selective and
effective transformation possibilities for oxidation reactions with high yield.
Catalysis by metal complexes encapsulated in the cavities of zeolites and
other molecular sieves has many features of homogeneous, heterogeneous. and
enzymatic catalysis. Serious attempts have been made to gain product selectivity
in catalysis by means of enzyme mimicking. Immobilization of the active center in
the zeolite pores is the essence of synthetic biomimetic chemistry, and is
responsible for the shape selective properties of such catalysts. The notable
superiority of this kind of catalytic system is in single-site reactions, high
selectivity, and tenability (which are the advantages of homogeneous catalysts)
together with ease of separation of products from reactants, durability, stability. and
easy handling (advantages of heterogeneous catalysts). The catalytic activity
shown by the encapsulated complexes can be correlated to the structure of the
active site inside the zeolite pore.
Chapter 1 of the thesis presents a general introduction about the zeolite
encapsulated metal complexes and the catalytic activity of metal complex catalysts
in certain oxidation reactions, particularly in the decomposition of hydrogen
peroxide, hydroxylation of phenol, and the partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol.
Information regarding the methods used for the synthesis of zeolite encapsulated
complexes; the role of zeolites as micro reactors and as enzyme mimics, and the
interaction between the guest and the host is also included in this chapter. The
chapter ends with a discussion of the significance of the work undertaken and its
scope, followed by relevant references.
Chapter 2 presents the details regarding materials and methods used for
the synthesis and characterization of the complexes. The techniques employed for
the characterization of the complexes include CHN analysis, AAS, XRD, SEM,
BET surface area and pore volume, magnetic measurements, DRS, FTIR, EPR,
and TG. The methods and techniques used for carrying out catalytic activity
studies and estimating the percentage conversion are also included in this chapter.
Chapter 3 is divided into two sections: Section A and Section B. Section
A describes the synthesis and characterization of zeolite Y encapsulated Fe(III),
Co(n), Ni(n), and Cu(n) complexes of the Schiff bases NN'-bis(3-pyridylidene)-
1,2-phenylenediamine (SPO) and N,N' -bis(3-pyridylidene )-1 ,4-phenylenediamine
(SPP). Section B deals with Co(n), Ni(n), and Cu(n) complexes of salicylaldehyde
semicarbazone (SALSC).
Ion exchanged zeolites MY (M= Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Pd) were prepared
and characterized. All the encapsulated complexes were synthesized using the
flexible ligand method and purified by soxhlet extraction. SEM taken before and
after encapsulation indicates the absence of surface adsorbed species. XRD
patterns indicate that there is no loss in crystallinity for the zeolite structure even
after encapsulation. The Si/AI ratio of the encapsulated complex is the same as that
of the ion exchanged zeolite showing the retention of zeolite structure after
encapsulation. The lower surface area and pore volume of the encapsulated
complex compared to the ion-exchanged zeolite suggest encapsulation of the metal
complex inside the zeolite pore.
The coordination sites of ligands to the metals were arrived at from the IR
spectra. The strong bandsat 1581cm-
1
and 1610 cm-I in the spectra of the ligand
SPO and SPP are shifted to the lower energy region in the spectra of complexes,
232
indicating coordination of azo-methine nitrogen. The ligand absorption of SALSC
at 1620cm-
1
due to uc=o is shifted to a lower region (l550-1545cm-
l
) in the
complexes. On the basis of magnetic moment, electronic spectra, and EPR of
Cu(II) complexes, an octahedral geometry was tentatively assigned for the
encapsulated complexes of FeYSPO, CoYSPO, NiYSPO, FeYSPP, CoYSPP,
NiYSPP, CoYSALSC, and NiYSALSC; and square planar geometry was assigned
for CuYSPO, CuYSPP, and CuYSALSC from EPR spectra. The a
2
values between
0.87 and 0.91 for the copper complexes of SPO, SPP, and SALSC suggest an ionic
environment for Cu(u) ions. Neat SPO complexes of Co(u) and Ni(n) have been
reported to be square planar. The change in geometry in the case of Ni(n)
complexes can be attributed to the interaction of the oxide ions of the zeolite
framework. Only a qualitative idea regarding the decomposition patterns of zeolite
encapsulated complexes was obtained from the TO curves. The mass loss around
lOO-125C is due to loss of free water and coordinated water. The major mass loss
from 125-500 C can be due to the decomposition of the complexes. However
distinct stages of decomposition were not observed in any of the TO curves.
Chapter 4 presents a comparative study of neat and encapsulated 2-
styrylbenzimidazole complexes of Cu(u). The analytical data confirm the
composition of the neat complex to be Cu(SBhCh. The Si/AI ratio and the XRD
patterns of the encapsulated complex suggest that there is no collapse of the zeolite
framework on encapsulation. The formation of the complex in the zeolite cage is
further confirmed by surface area analysis, pore volume analysis, and the absence
of surface species was noted from SEM.
The IR spectral data indicate that the coordination of the ligand is through
the vC=N of styrylbenzimidazole. Magnetic moment, diffuse reflectance spectra
and EPR spectra of the two complexes suggest square planar structure for the neat
and encapsulated complexes. The TOIDTO of the neat complex gives clear idea
regarding the decomposition pattern of the complex whereas the TO of the
encapsulated complex gives only qualitative idea regarding the decomposition.
233
There are two stages of decomposition for the neat complex. The mass loss in the
first stage might be due to expulsion of one styrylbenzimidazole and the mass loss
in the second stage of decomposition corresponds to the removal of one
styrylbenzimidazole and two chlorine atoms. The TG curve of the encapsulated
complex shows that most of the intrazeolite free water molecules are released in
the temperature range 30-100 DC. The mass loss in the temperature range 100-534
DC can be due to the removal of ligands and coordinated water if any.
Chapter 5 is divided into two sections: Section A and Section B. Section
A deals with the synthesis and characterization of zeolite encapsulated complexes
of Fe(m) dithicarbamates of MDTC, EPDTC and IPDTC, and Section B deals
with the studies on CoOII), Ni(II), and Cu(n) morpholinedithiocarbamtes. The
SilAI ratio and the XRD patterns indicate the retention of zeolite framework.
Decrease in surface area and pore volume confirms encapsulation of complexes
and SEM indicates the absence of surface species. The positive shift of VN=CS
2
seen in the IR spectra is an indication of the interaction of the chelated sulphur
atoms with the metal. This indicates that coordination has occurred through
sulphur atoms.
Magnetic moment studies indicate octahedral structure for the encapsulated
Fe(m) complexes, suggesting that there is no change in structure on encapsulation.
The cobalt complex was found to be diamagnetic,suggesting a low spin octahedral
structure for the complex. The neat Ni(lI) dithiocarbamate complexes which were
reported to have square planar appears to have octahedral structure when inside
the zeolite cages. The Cu(u) complex which is square planar showed no change in
geometry on encapsulation. The structure of copper complex is further supported
by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and the EPR spectrum. The ratio gill All is 109.2
cm for CuYMTDC suggesting a square planar environment around Cu (11) ion. The
value of a
2
is 0.9495, suggesting ionic environment for the Cu
2
+ ions in the zeolite
cavity. TG curves are continuous and so the stages of decomposition are not
distinct.
234
Chapter 6 reports the study of the zeolite encapsulated palladium
complexes of OMG, SALSC and MDTC. Chemical analysis reveals that the
complexes are present as monomeric species in the zeolite lattice. The lowering of
the surface area and pore volume values confirm the presence of the complex
inside the zeolite pore, and the XRO patterns indicate the retention of zeolite
crystallinity. The shift of the C=N stretching vibration to lower energy region of
ligand OMG; the positive shift of VN=CS
2
of morpholinecarbodithioate; and the
shift of vc=o stretch of salicylaldehyde semicarbazone to 1600 cm-I are observed
in the IR spectra of PdYOMG, PdYMOTC, and PdYSALSC respectively, which
support the coordination of the ligand to the metal in the complexes. All the
palladium-encapsulated complexes were found to be diamagnetic. Electronic
spectra also support square planar geometry for the complexes.
Chapter 7 deals with the studies on the decomposition of hydrogen
peroxide in the presence of complexes of sPa, SPP, SALSC, SB, MOTC, and
OMG. The catalytic activity of PdYSALSC, CuYMDTC and CuYSB was studied
in detail. PdYSALSC was found to be the most active catalyst in the
decomposition; CuYMOTC showed moderate activity, while CuYSB showed
much lower activity. The difference in activity can be correlated to the structural
features (geometry) of the complex. All the active complexes have square planar
geometry. Complexes having two free sites on the metal ion facilitates the reaction
of the intermediate LM(HOO) (n-I)+ with a second peroxide ion. The highly
reactive species formed enhances the decomposition process. The activity of the
encapsulated complex was much higher compared to that of the ion exchanged
zeolites indicating the influence of the ligand. In the present study, activity with
regard to the ligand was found to vary as follows:
SALSC > MOTC > SB.
Therefore it appears that the chelate fonnation and the ring size of the chelate have
a role in the activity.
235
The rate of decomposition reveals that the encapsulated complexes are
more active than the neat complexes. The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide
with each of the three catalysts was found to increase with increase in the weight
of the catalyst. A change in the solvent polarity of the reaction medium slowed
down the decomposition reaction indicating the involvement of the HOO- species
in catalysis. The direct addition of pyridine to the catalyst deactivated the
decomposition processes while the addition of pyridine to the mixture of hydrogen
peroxide and catalyst increased the rate of the reaction. This again confirms that
hydrogen peroxide decomposes according to the equation
H
2
0
2
--+ W + HOO-
HOO- being the species involved in catalysis. The activity of the Cu complexes
was retained / slightly lost on recycling while the activity of the encapsulated Pd
complex was considerably reduced.
Chapter 8 of the thesis presents our studies on the hydroxylation of phenol
using the encapsulated complexes. The hydroxylation of phenol to hydroquinone
was carried out at room temperature with 30 % hydrogen peroxide as oxidant.
From the screening studies, CuYSALSC and CuYMDTC were found to be the
most active catalysts. GC analysis of the product of the reaction revealed that these
catalysts exhibit high para selectivity in the product stream. Selectivity to
hydroquinone was greater than 95 % with both the catalysts. Apart from high
selectivity, high hydroquinone yield was also observed in both the cases. This
method is simple and economical and minimizes the formation of undesired
products. The reaction was screened using metal exchanged zeolite (CuY) and neat
complexes. On screening with CuY, catechol was found to be the only product. In
the case of neat complexes, tarry products were obtained, which might be due to
the presence of too many active centers. Thus encapsulation increases the activity
and para selectivity in these cases. Another feature of the reaction is that the
catalyst remains in the solid phase during the entire reaction and can be easily
filtered off at the end of the reaction. Activity increased with increase in the
amount of the catalyst up to a certain level. Further increase in the amount of the
236
catalyst had no effect at all. It was observed that there is an optimum time for each
catalyst for the completion of the reaction. The optimum time for CuYSALSC was
5 hours and that for Cu YMDTC was 2 hours. Unwanted products were obtained
when the reaction was allowed to proceed beyond this time. This might be due to
over oxidation or due to the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. The induction
period observed in the cases of the two catalysts suggests a free radical mechanism
for these two catalysts.
The catalytic activity showed a strong dependence on the hydrogen
peroxide - phenol volume ratio. Tarry products were obtained on increasing the
volume of hydrogen peroxide. This can be due to the over oxidation of phenol at
high hydrogen peroxide concentration. The maximum yield of hydroquinone was
obtained when the H
2
02 _ phenol volume ratio was 5. This suggests that the
possible mechanism can be via the formation of H
3
0
2
+.
The yield of hydroquinone decreased as temperature increased from 30C
to 70 QC. The reduction in the percentage conversion to hydroquinone on
increasing the temperature to 50C may be due to the formation of some other
products resulting from the slow diffusivity at higher production ratio from the
pore, leading to further reaction or due to the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide
at higher temperatures. Tarry products are formed at 70C with both CuYSALSC
and Cu YMDTC, and this can be the result of the exothermic nature of the reaction
or due to over oxidation, or some other side reaction.
Water appears to be the best solvent for the reaction compared to methanol,
acetone and benzene. The radical scavenging methanol and acetone may remove
the reactive phenol radicals and affect the catalytic reaction. In benzene there is no
conversion at all. This can be because hydrogen peroxide is insoluble in benzene.
The catalyst showed good resistance to deactivation on adding poison (pyridine).
On recycling they showed 50-60% activity compared to unused catalysts. This
again confirms the stability of the catalysts inside the zeolite pore.
237
Chapter 9 deals with our studies on the partial oxidation of benzyl alcohol
to benzaldehyde. The oxidation was carried out using hydrogen peroxide as
oxidant in presence of PdYDMG and CuYSPP as catalysts. The product
(benzaldehyde) was detected using TLC and confirmed using Gc.
The catalytic activity of the complexes was tested for oxidation under
various conditions. The operating conditions like the amount of the catalyst,
reaction time, oxidant to substrate ratio, reaction temperature, and solvents have
been optimized. No further oxidation products were obtained on continuing the
reaction for four hours beyond the optimum time. Maximum conversion was
obtained at room temperature and the percentage conversion decreased with
increase in temperature. Activity was found to be dependent on the solvent used.
The poison resistance of the catalysts was checked by adding pyridine.
Both the catalysts were deactivated by poison. The activity of the recycled
catalysts was also studied. Cu YSPP showed no change in activity on first
recycling while the activity of PdYDMG was reduced to almost 67 % of the fresh
catalyst.
Both PdYDMG and Cu YSPP have square planar geometry indicating the
influence of structure in catalytic activity. It appears that the precursor formed by
the coordination of an oxygen atom to the vacant metal site in the complex might
be responsible for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde. Further more,
in these reactions, there was 100% selectivity towards benzaldehyde. In effect
these catalysts satisfy the basic need of green chemistry, making chemical
synthesis more environmentally friendly.
238