FoamsSectorReport2002 PDF
FoamsSectorReport2002 PDF
FoamsSectorReport2002 PDF
Projects since the last OORG meeting Regulatory Update Technology Update TEAP/TOC Activities CFC preblended polyols- Polyurethane Terminology Monitoring & Evaluation Study MFF Secretariat Report on Rigid Foam OORG Working Group Studies LCD Technology Small Rigid Foam Enterprises
World Bank
World Bank
REGULATORY UPDATE
u u
US HCFC position still unresolved European Union HCFC phase-outs (EC (2000)2037) and Japan up to 1/1/2004 for foams Actions in Europe to constrain HFC emissions early phase-outs possible in Austria, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland EU Framework Directive proposal expected mid-2002 Actions in EU and Japan to capture/destroy HCFCs at end-oflife New EU Refrigerator Energy standards planned for 2005 existing Class A will be poorest type available
World Bank
Hydrocarbons technically approved for most polyurethane rigid foam applications with exception of spray foam (process safety) and some end product flammability classifications SME constraints apply for HC use wide scale use of HCFC 141b market introduction of HFC 365mfc and HFC 245fa, particularly in blends for cost reduction and nonflammable mixtures
World Bank
u u
Flexible slabstock - use of LCD spreading Box foams - need for cost effective Methylene Chloride replacement remains CO2 (water) standard technology for moulded foams and shoe-soles - evaluation of liquid HFCs for some integral skin applications
World Bank
'98
'99
'00
'01
Benefits of Cyclo/Iso technology: Better flow Better density distribution Lower cost
'98
'99
'00
'01
TEAP Study on fate of ODS - Task Forces Collection, Recovery and Storage Destruction Technologies TOC Report for foams 2002 Update Report for Foams
World Bank
POLYURETHANE TERMINOLOGY
TERM Urethane Polyurethane Isocyanate Isocyanate (polyurethane) Prepolymer (Base) Polyol (Base) Polyol Blend Polyol Formulation Fully formulated polyol Polyurethane system
* In
EXPLANATION Chemical group from OH + -NCO Polymer with urethane links Chemicals with 2 (+) NCO, TDI or MDI Modified isocyanate by reacting excess of isocyanate with a polyol Short chain polymer with 2 (+) OH groups polyether or polyester Blend of 2 or more base polyols Polyol or polyol blend plus catalyst(s), surfactants and fire retardants Polyol formulation plus blowing agent Package of Isocyanate + fully formulated polyol
CFC ?
POLYURETHANE TERMINOLOGY
TERM Urethane Polyurethane Isocyanate EXPLANATION Chemical group from OH + -NCO Polymer with urethane links Chemicals with 2 (+) NCO, TDI or MDI CFC ?
Isocyanate (polyurethane) Modified isocyanate by reacting excess of Terms such as polyol premix, polyols, Prepolymer isocyanate with apreblended polyol blend are missleading and result in (Base) Polyol Short chain polymer with 2 confusion (+) OH groups polyether or polyester (Base) Polyol Blend Blend of 2 or more base polyols Polyol Formulation Fully formulated polyol Polyurethane system
* In
Polyol or polyol blend plus catalyst(s), surfactants and fire retardants Polyol formulation plus blowing agent Package of Isocyanate + fully formulated polyol
POLYURETHANE TERMINOLOGY
u u
If a fully formulated polyol is specified, where is the CFC consumption? At the supplier (e.g. the systems house) or at the foam manufacturer?
World Bank
Presented at the 33rd ExCOM, March 2001 Modus Operandi - desk studies, visits of consultant teams to 66 enterprises, reporting with proposed actions Completion of projects
CFC use eliminated? Alternative production? Destruction of CFC equipment? - retrofitting not considered?
Technical choices
Top 3 - HCFC 141b, CO2(water), Methylene Chloride Change of technology issue
u u u u
Lessons
Question of incentives
Modus Operandi - Field visits, questionnaires Comparison of costings of one versus two-step strategies show:
Captial cost out weighs operating cost savings Same is true with transition to HFC after 5 years
u u
Market conditions in developing countries are different from those in developed countries; they also differ between different developing countries Effect of blowing agent (CFC 11, HCFC 141b) prices considered but not future availability of HCFC 141b Alternative choice depended on:
Commercial availability of proven technology Obtaining permit to use Market acceptability of foam Commercial viability of price of alternative
u u
Alternative choice not affected by MLF IOC rules Size of enterprise is a major factor in selecting technology (HC or HCFC) World Bank
u u u u u
STUDIES SINCE INCEPTION OF OORG #2 Reducing ODS Use in Foam-Blown Pre-insulated Pipes (12/92) #3 Reducing ODS Use in Developing Countries in Domestic Refrigerator/Freezer Insulating Foams (10/93) #8 Zero ODS Foam Pre-insulated Pipe Alternatives (5/94) #9 Transitional and Zero ODS Domestic Refrigerator/Freezer Insulation Alternatives (5/94) #14 Factors Which Affect Operating Costs:Foam Densities and Plastic Liner Grades (9/98) #15 Foam Density Report 2000 #16 Flexible and Integral Skin Foams
World Bank
u u u u u
STUDIES SINCE INCEPTION OF OORG #2 Reducing ODS Use in Foam-Blown Pre-insulated Pipes (12/92) #3 Reducing ODS Use in Developing Countries in Domestic Refrigerator/Freezer Insulating Foams (10/93) #8 Zero ODS Foam Pre-insulated Pipe Alternatives (5/94) #9 Transitional and Zero ODS Domestic Refrigerator/Freezer Insulation Alternatives (5/94) #14 Factors Which Affect Operating Costs:Foam Densities and Plastic Liner Grades (9/98) #15 Foam Density Report 2000 #16 Flexible and Integral Skin Foams
World Bank
u u
Accepted on a provisional basis by ExCOM (Decision 31/44) Very comprehensive but concise document produced by expert group Report divided rigid foam applications into 19 subsegments and listed density changes for all alternative technologies Recommendations are easy to use in developing projects Report is still current and covers contemporary technologies
World Bank
CONTINUOUS PANELS DISCONTINUOUS PANELS SPRAY FOAMS Walls Roofs Pipes & tanks
World Bank
u u
Accepted on a provisional basis by ExCOM (Decision 31/44) Very comprehensive but concise document produced by expert group Report divided rigid foam applications into 19 subsegments and listed density changes for all alternative technologies Recommendations are easy to use in developing projects Report is still current and covers contemporary technologies Recommendation to continue to apply its findings
World Bank
Submitted to the Secretariat in January 2001 Very comprehensive but concise document produced by expert group Report divided applications into 25 sub-segments and listed processing, technology learning, SME and density guidance for all alternative technologies
World Bank
FURNITURE
Institutional/Commercial Mattresses
TRANSPORTATION
Seat backs Seat cushions Arm/Head rests Saddles Fascias (semi-rigid)
MISCELLANEOUS
Packaging Toys Sporting goods
World Bank
kg/m
REDUCED PRESSURE (BOXFOAM) MC NO YES
NO
MC/LIA
NO
YES?
DEPENDS ON ALTITUDE OF FACTORY TANKS, SEALS, TOXICITY DEDICATED METERING SYSTEM,TANKS, SEALS, TOXICITY COOLING TABLE SAFETY
NO YES, HP
NO
NOT APPLICABLE
World Bank
Submitted to the Secretariat in January 2001 Very comprehensive but concise document produced by expert group Report divided applications into 25 sub-segments and listed processing, technology learning, SME and density guidance for all alternative technologies Recommendations are very relevant for the development of projects
World Bank
LCD PROJECTS - 1
u
u u
Introduction in mid 1990s of Liquid Carbon Dioxide technology (LCD) has been a major technology stepchange in auxiliary blowing agent/flexible slabstock technology LCD has eliminated the use of methylene chloride as an alternative Now used at ca. 105 production plants (70 US and Europe) and 35 in developing countries - plus 11 in raw material suppliers facilities - plus 15+ projects in process of conversion
World Bank
LCD PROJECTS - 2
u
Benefits
EHS in the factory Environmental acceptability - permanent solution Foam properties
Restrictions/downsides
Cost effectiveness for SMEs Learning period - technical capability of enterprise important Density range down to 15 kg/m3 proven Not suitable for box foam
World Bank
Threshold for rigid foam projects is $ 7.83/kg ODS For a 10 tonne CFC 11 project - this limits funding to $ 78,000 Whilst the technical acceptability of HCs has been extended, the capital cost of application is still up to $ 400,000 - -far above the grant limits for many small producers For almost all applications HCFC 141b is near to a dropin CFC 11 replacement in terms of processing and foam properties Low price of CFC 11 is a barrier to transition
World Bank
Future availability of HCFC 141b (outside China) is a question HCFC 141b has been widely applied to meet CFC reduction targets A 2-step approach is an inevitable consequence Cost learning with the liquid HFCs will occur in Develop country SMEs from now to HCFC phase-out and can be applied in developing countries There is time to set up HFC supply chains
World Bank