Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 39 views

    Software Verification: ACI 318-08 Example 002

    Uploaded by

    Bùi Văn Hợp
    This document describes an example analysis of a reinforced concrete column subjected to axial load and bending moment to check the demand-to-capacity ratio. The column is analyzed using SAP2000 software and results are verified against independent hand calculations. Both methods find the demand-to-capacity ratio to be 1.000, indicating the column design is adequate. The hand calculations show the step-by-step work to calculate the column capacity and compare it to the demand loads.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Software Verification: ACI 318-08 Example 002

    Uploaded by

    Bùi Văn Hợp
    39 views4 pages
    This document describes an example analysis of a reinforced concrete column subjected to axial load and bending moment to check the demand-to-capacity ratio. The column is analyzed using SAP2000 software and results are verified against independent hand calculations. Both methods find the demand-to-capacity ratio to be 1.000, indicating the column design is adequate. The hand calculations show the step-by-step work to calculate the column capacity and compare it to the demand loads.

    Original Title

    ACI 318-08 Ex002

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document describes an example analysis of a reinforced concrete column subjected to axial load and bending moment to check the demand-to-capacity ratio. The column is analyzed using SAP2000 software and results are verified against independent hand calculations. Both methods find the demand-to-capacity ratio to be 1.000, indicating the column design is adequate. The hand calculations show the step-by-step work to calculate the column capacity and compare it to the demand loads.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    39 views4 pages

    Software Verification: ACI 318-08 Example 002

    Uploaded by

    Bùi Văn Hợp
    This document describes an example analysis of a reinforced concrete column subjected to axial load and bending moment to check the demand-to-capacity ratio. The column is analyzed using SAP2000 software and results are verified against independent hand calculations. Both methods find the demand-to-capacity ratio to be 1.000, indicating the column design is adequate. The hand calculations show the step-by-step work to calculate the column capacity and compare it to the demand loads.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME:
    SAP2000
    REVISION NO.:
    0



    ACI 318-08 Example 002 - 1
    ACI 318-08 Example 002

    P-M INTERACTION CHECK FOR COMPRESSION-CONTROLLED RECTANGULAR COLUMN
    EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
    The Demand/Capacity ratio for a given axial loading and moment is tested in this
    example.
    A reinforced concrete column is subjected factored axial load Pu = 398.4 k and
    moments Muy = 332 k-ft. This column is reinforced with 4 #9 bars. The total area
    of reinforcement is 8.00 in
    2
    . The design capacity ratio is checked by hand
    calculations and result is compared.

    GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING
    Pu=398.4 kips




















    Material Properties
    E = 3600 k/in
    2
    = 0.2
    G = 1500 k/in
    2





    Section Properties Design Properties
    fc = 4 k/in
    2
    fy = 60 k/in
    2

    b = 14 in
    d = 19.5 in


    A
    10
    Section A-A
    14"
    2.5"
    22"
    A
    Muy=332k-ft

    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME:
    SAP2000
    REVISION NO.:
    0



    ACI 318-08 Example 002 - 2
    TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED
    Tied Reinforced Concrete Column Demand/Capacity Ratio

    RESULTS COMPARISON
    Independent results are hand calculated and compared.
    Output Parameter SAP2000 Independent
    Percent
    Difference
    Column Demand/Capacity Ratio 1.000

    1.00 0.00%
    COMPUTER FILE: ACI 318-08 Ex002
    CONCLUSION
    The computed results show an exact match with the independent results.
    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME:
    SAP2000
    REVISION NO.:
    0



    ACI 318-08 Example 002 - 3
    HAND CALCULATION
    COLUMN STRENGTH UNDER COMPRESSION CONTROL

    fc = 4 ksi fy = 60 ksi
    b = 14 inch d = 19.5 inch
    Pu = 398.4 kips Mu = 332 k-ft

    1) Because e = 10 inch < (2/3)d = 13 inch., assume compression failure. This assumption will be
    checked later. Calculate the distance to the neutral axis for a balanced condition, cb:

    Position of neutral axis at balance condition:

    ( )
    87 87
    = = 19.5 =11.54
    87 + 87 +60
    b t
    y
    c d
    f
    inch

    2) From the equation of equilibrium:

    = +
    n c s
    P C C T
    where
    = 0.85 = 0.85 4 14 = 47.6 - -
    '
    c c
    C f ab a a
    ( ) ( ) = - 0.85 = 4 60- 0.85 4 = 226.4 -
    ' '
    s s y c
    C A f f kips
    Assume compression steels yields, (this assumption will be checked later).
    ( )
    4
    s s s s y
    T = A f = f f < f
    = 47.6 +226.4- 4
    n s
    P a f (Eqn. 1)

    3) Taking moments about As:


    ( )
    1
    =
    2
    ( | |
    +
    | (
    \ .
    '
    n c s '
    a
    P C d - C d - d
    e

    The plastic centroid is at the center of the section and
    "
    d = 8.5 inch
    =10 +8.5 =18.5
    ' "
    e =e+d inch.
    ( )
    1
    = 47.6 19.5 226.4 19.5- 2.5
    2
    ( | |
    +
    | (
    \ .
    n
    a
    P a -
    18.5

    Software Verification
    PROGRAM NAME:
    SAP2000
    REVISION NO.:
    0



    ACI 318-08 Example 002 - 4

    2
    = 50.17 1.29 +208
    n
    P a - a (Eqn. 2)

    4) Assume c = 13.45 inch, which exceed cb (11.54 inch).

    = 0.85 13.45 =11.43 - a inch

    Substitute in Eqn. 2:
    ( )
    2
    = 50.17 11.43 1.29 11.43 + 208 = 612.9 - -
    n
    P - kips

    5) Calculate fs from the strain diagram when c = 13.45 inch.


    19.5-13.45
    = 87 = 39.13
    13.45
    | |
    |
    \ .
    s
    f ksi
    =
    s t s s
    = f E = 0.00135

    6) Substitute a = 13.45 inch and fs = 39.13 ksi in Eqn. 1 to calculate Pn2:
    ( ) ( ) = 47.6 11.43 +226.4- 4 39.13 613.9 =
    n2
    P kips
    Which is very close to the calculated Pn2 of 612.9 kips (less than 1% difference)
    10
    = 612.9 510.8
    12
    | |
    =
    |
    \ .
    n n
    M = Pe kips-ft

    7) Check if compression steels yield. From strain diagram,
    ( )
    13.45- 2.5
    = 0.003 = 0.00244 > 0.00207
    13.45
    c
    | |
    =
    |
    \ .
    '
    s y
    ksi
    Compression steels yields, as assumed.

    8) Calculate | ,
    = =19.5
    t
    d d inch, c = 13.45 inch
    c
    t
    (at the tension reinforcement level) =
    19.45-13.45
    0.003 = 0.00135
    13.45
    | |
    |
    \ .


    Since 0.002 c <
    t
    , then | = 0.65

    ( ) = 0.65 612.9 398.4
    n
    P | = kips
    ( ) = 0.65 510.8 332 | =
    n
    M k-ft.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy