Serum Surfactant Protein D Is Steroid Sensitive and Associated With Exacerbations of COPD
Serum Surfactant Protein D Is Steroid Sensitive and Associated With Exacerbations of COPD
Serum Surfactant Protein D Is Steroid Sensitive and Associated With Exacerbations of COPD
m
L
-
1
a) b)
800
600
400
200
***
***
#
NS S COPD II III IV
Controls GOLD stage
NS S COPD II III
Controls GOLD stage
Subjects Subjects
IV
l
l
l
l
l
l
l l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l l l l l
l
l
+
FIGURE 1. a) Serum surfactant protein (SP)-D levels in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and controls; and b) effect of current smoking on
SP-D levels in smoking controls and individuals with COPD (shown as a whole and divided into groups based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
(GOLD) classification). Vertical bars represent median and interquartile range ($: mean; #: outliers). The number of individuals (h)/current smokers (u) in each group was:
nonsmoker (NS) controls 201/0, smoker (S) controls 296/201, all COPD subjects 1,888/746, GOLD stage II COPD 846/334, GOLD stage III COPD 811/324, and GOLD stage
IV COPD 229/76 (&: former smokers). ***: p,0.001;
#
: p50.021;
"
: p50.024;
+
: p50.001.
COPD AND SMOKING-RELATED DISORDERS D.A. LOMAS ET AL.
98 VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1 EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
small increase relative to placebo in pre- and post-bronchodi-
lator FEV1 of 97 and 107 mL, respectively (fig. 3a); neither of
these changes were significant (p50.07 and 0.06, respectively).
However, treatment with prednisolone resulted in a striking
fall in serum SP-D level from 126.0 to 82.1 ng?mL
-1
at 4 weeks
(p,0.001) (fig. 3b). The concentration remained low whilst the
subjects were taking 20 mg?day
-1
prednisolone and rose as the
dose of steroids was reduced before returning to baseline
2 weeks after cessation of therapy. There was no change
(136.0 ng?mL
-1
at baseline, 135.8 ng?mL
-1
at week 4) in serum
SP-D level in those individuals who received placebo. The
effect of prednisolone was specific for SP-D as there was no
significant reduction in serum levels of other inflammatory
markers that have been reported to be elevated in COPD
(fibrinogen; interleukin-1b, -8 or -6; myeloperoxidase or matrix
metalloproteinase-9 (data not shown)).
DISCUSSION
The ECLIPSE cohort was used to evaluate serum SP-D as a
biomarker for COPD. The median serum SP-D level was
significantly higher in current and former smokers with COPD
than in those without airflow obstruction. The serum SP-D
level was similar in males and females, was unaffected by the
presence of chronic bronchitis and did not correlate with either
the radiologists emphysema score or areas of low attenuation
on the CT scan (,-950 HU). Moreover, there was no significant
increase in serum levels with increasingly severe disease (as
assessed by GOLD score). The difference in serum SP-D levels
between individuals with COPD and smoker and nonsmoker
controls, although significant, is not sufficiently large to use in
a screening test to diagnose COPD.
The largest difference in serum SP-D levels occurred between
nonsmokers and current/former smokers. Therefore, serum
SP-D is a powerful biomarker for smoking. Intrapulmonary
SP-D levels rise following the acute exposure of mice to
cigarette smoke [23], but are lower in lung lavage fluid from
individuals with COPD [14] and cystic fibrosis [24].
Approximately 75% of SP-D is found in bronchoalveolar
lavage fluid [5], and it is likely that this hydrophilic protein,
or its degradation products, leaks from the lung as a
consequence of increased vascular permeability associated
with inflammation. It is then detected within the circulation.
Thus serum SP-D reflects intrapulmonary inflammation, which
would explain the higher levels in smokers with and
without COPD.
A normal range for serum SP-D level can be derived from
nonsmoking controls. It was striking that those individuals
with COPD who had SP-D levels that were greater than the
TABLE 2 Assessment of the reproducibility of serum surfactant protein (SP)-D measurement
COPD subjects Smoker controls Nonsmoker controls p-value
#
Subjects n 195 36 36
Age yrs 64.56.0 60.87.7 59.78.8 0.002
Males n (%) 141 (72) 24 (67) 14 (39) 0.492
Smoking history pack-yrs 45.827.2 29.816.5 1.00.0 0.001
FEV1 L 1.20.5 3.20.6 3.10.7 ,0.001
FEV1 % pred 43.916.9 108.911.8 115.812.0 ,0.001
FEV1/FVC 0.400.12 0.800.06 0.800.05 ,0.001
CT scans n 178 29 32
Low attenuation area
"
% 22.613.5 4.54.4 5.45.5 ,0.001
Baseline SP-D ng?mL
-1
103.6 (77.6143.9) 96.5 (68.6121.4) 71.8 (49.199.8) 0.116
SP-D results at 3 months n 181 35 34
SP-D at 3 months ng?mL
-1
105.1 (70.5145.2) 95.5 (59.4120.0) 77.5 (49.596.6) 0.232
Data are presented as meanSD or median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated. The lung function measurements followed the administration of 180 mg
salbutamol. All of the smoking controls and individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were former smokers. The number of computed tomography
(CT) scans is the number of scans available for qualitative analysis to assess the percentage of the lungs with a density of ,-950 HU. FEV1: forced expiratory volume in
1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; % pred: percentage of the predicted value.
#
: COPD subjects versus smoker controls (p,0.001 for COPD subjects versus nonsmoker
controls for all parameters);
"
: ,-950 HU.
200
-250
D
S
P
-
D
n
g
m
L
-
1
150
100
50
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
0
Mean SP-D ngmL
-1
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u u
u
u u
u
u u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
uu
u
u u u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
uu
u
u
u
u
u
u u
u
u
u u
u
u
u
u
u
uu
u u
u
u
uuu
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u u
u
u
u
u
u
uuuu
u
u
u u u
u
u
u
u
u
uu u u u
u
u
u
u u
u
u u
u
u
u
u
u
u u
u
uuuu
u u u
uuu
u
u
u
uuu
u u
u
u
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
FIGURE 2. BlandAltman plot for assessment of the reproducibility of serum
levels of surfactant protein (SP)-D at baseline and 3 months in 267 individuals with
and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (--------: no difference (D);
.....
: 95% limits of agreement). The bias is -2.23 and coefficient of repeatability
70.20 ng?mL
-1
.
D.A. LOMAS ET AL. COPD AND SMOKING-RELATED DISORDERS
c
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1 99
95th percentile of normal controls showed a greater risk of self-
reported exacerbations. These symptoms were reported pro-
spectively and were, therefore, not dependent on recall bias.
The findings were unchanged if exacerbations were defined as
requiring the administration of antibiotics. Moreover, the risk
of exacerbations increased with increasing baseline serum
SP-D concentrations, with an even greater risk if the analysis
were confined to those individuals in the upper quartile of
baseline SP-D level. It is possible that this effect was driven by
a few outliers and thus the analysis was repeated following the
exclusion of individuals with the highest serum SP-D levels.
Again, serum SP-D was associated with exacerbations of
COPD. Finally, it is possible that serum SP-D level is affected
by comorbid conditions and so the analysis was repeated with
either diuretic or b-blocker medication being included as
confounding factors. This did not affect the results.
Previous work has shown that plasma C-reactive protein [25]
and serum amyloid A [26] are nonspecific markers of
exacerbations of COPD, with raised levels of serum amyloid
A being associated with more severe episodes [26]. However,
serum SP-D is the first biomarker that has been shown to
predict an increased risk of exacerbations of COPD in a large
prospective cohort. It is perhaps not surprising that indivi-
duals with the greatest levels of intrapulmonary inflammation
(as evidenced by raised serum SP-D levels) are at the greatest
risk of exacerbations since previous studies have shown that
the severity of exacerbations of COPD tracks with airway
inflammation [27]. Exacerbations of COPD are associated with
significant deterioration in health status [28], and thus serum
SP-D may be useful in identifying those at greatest risk
and who may, therefore, benefit from treatment with either
anti-inflammatory agents or prophylactic antibiotics. If a
biomarker is to be used to identify individuals at risk of
exacerbations then it must be stable over time. Serum SP-D
level was assessed in a different group of individuals in the
ECLIPSE cohort. The levels showed 26% variability in
nonsmokers and former smokers with and without COPD
over a 3-month interval. This variability may be higher in
individuals with higher baseline serum SP-D levels.
A biomarker that reflects the intrapulmonary inflammation of
COPD should respond to the administration of a potent anti-
inflammatory agent such as prednisolone. Indeed, there was a
rapid and marked fall in serum SP-D levels whilst individuals
150
50
L
S
M
s
e
r
u
m
S
P
-
D
n
g
m
L
-
1
75
100
0 2 4
(end
20 mg)
Time-point week
b)
0.4
-0.2
L
S
M
D
F
E
V
1
L
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 2 4 6
Time-point week
l
l
l
l
n
n
n
n
a)
l
l
l
l
l
**
**
125
6
(end
run-out)
8
(end
washout)
45/44 42/43 40/39 37/39 38/38
FIGURE 3. Effect of oral corticosteroids in individuals with chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD) on: a) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1); and b)
serum surfactant protein (SP)-D level. Individuals with COPD were randomised to
prednisolone ($; &) or placebo (#; h). The prednisolone group received
20 mg?day
-1
prednisolone for 4 weeks, 10 mg?day
-1
prednisolone for 1 week and
5 mg?day
-1
prednisolone for 1 week. The effect of prednisolone on FEV1 is shown
before ($; #) and after (&; h) administration of 180 mg salbutamol. Least square
means (LSMs) were adjusted for baseline and study site in the analysis model. The
number of individuals at each time-point is shown for prednisolone/placebo in b).
Data were analysed by intention to treat and are presented as meanSEM. D:
change (from baseline (week 0)). **: p,0.001.
TABLE 3 Demographics and baseline characteristics of
individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease randomised to receive either oral
corticosteroids or placebo
Placebo Prednisolone
Subjects n 44 45
Age yrs 62.88.4 62.69.1
Males 32 (73) 35 (78)
FEV1 L 1.350.56 1.330.56
FEV1 % pred 49.615.6 46.615.1
FEV1/FVC 0.490.12 0.450.12
FEV1 reversibility % 15.114.7 18.217.9
Smoking history pack-yrs 53.435.1 48.424.5
Current smokers 21 (48) 19 (42)
Salbutamol 35 (80) 36 (80)
Ipratropium bromide 17 (39) 25 (56)
CT scans n 36 40
Emphysema on CT scan 34 (94) 36 (92)
Data are presented as meanSD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.
Reversibility was defined as an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s
(FEV1) following 180 mg salbutamol. The number of individuals with any
emphysema on their computed tomography (CT) scan was determined from
the radiologists score. There were five withdrawals in the prednisolone group
and four in the placebo group. FVC: forced vital capacity; % pred: percentage
of the predicted value.
COPD AND SMOKING-RELATED DISORDERS D.A. LOMAS ET AL.
100 VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1 EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
with COPD received oral corticosteroids. Serum SP-D levels
returned to baseline following the cessation of treatment. The
change in serum SP-D levels occurred in the context of
insufficient power to detect a significant change in the
standard measures of lung function, FEV1 and FVC.
Prednisolone did not mediate its effects by reducing the
expression of SP-D as exogenous steroids increase, rather than
reduce, SP-D expression in human lung [29]. It is more likely to
be reporting changes in permeability that result from suppres-
sion of inflammation. Thus SP-D is exquisitely more sensitive
in reporting the changes that result from the administration of
oral prednisolone than is lung function. It was difficult to
assess the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on serum SP-D level
in the present cohort as most subjects were taking this
medication.
The association of serum SP-D with COPD reported here arose
from a cross-sectional study. It will be important to assess
whether SP-D tracks with decline in lung function and
progression of emphysema, airways disease and systemic
features (such as BMI, fatigue, muscle wasting and systemic
inflammation) during the 3 yrs of follow-up of the ECLIPSE
cohort. If so, then serum SP-D offers a real prospect of a
biomarker that can report disease progression. Other studies
are needed to determine whether small molecules that reduce
inflammation and suppress SP-D can reduce exacerbations and
modify the decline in one or more of the indices that are
abnormal in individuals with COPD. If this is the case, then the
suppression of serum SP-D levels would provide an inter-
mediate measure of disease modification in COPD.
In summary, a large cohort of individuals with COPD and
smoking and nonsmoking controls have been used to show
that median serum SP-D levels are elevated, and predict
exacerbations, in individuals with COPD. These levels fall
following treatment with oral corticosteroids. Thus serum
SP-D may be useful as an intermediate measure in the
development of anti-inflammatory therapies for COPD.
CLINICAL TRIALS
This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (trial numbers
NCT00292552 and NCT00379730).
STATEMENT OF INTEREST
Statements of interest for D.A. Lomas, E.K. Silverman, L.D. Edwards,
B.E. Miller, D.H. Horstman and R. Tal-Singer and the study itself can
be found at www.erj.ersjournals.com/misc/statements.dtl
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to express their thanks to all of the subjects
who took part in the present studies. They are grateful to R. Harding
(GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) for help with study NCT00379730 and
E. Kurali (GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA) for exploratory
statistics. The quantitative computed tomography (CT) analysis was
performed by the Thoracic Imaging Group at the University of British
Columbia (Vancouver, BC, Canada) under the direction of H. Coxson,
and the CT scans were qualitatively assessed by N. Mu ller and
P. Nasute Fauerbach.
Principal investigators and centres participating in the Evaluation of
COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints study
(NCT00292552): Bulgaria: Y. Ivanov (Pleven), and K. Kostov (Sofia);
Canada: J. Bourbeau (Montreal, QC), M. Fitzgerald (Vancouver, BC),
P. Hernandez (Halifax, NS), K. Killian (Hamilton, ON), R. Levy
(Vancouver, BC), F. Maltais (Montreal, QC), and D. ODonnell
(Kingston, ON); Czech Republic: J. Krepelka (Prague); Denmark:
J. Vestbo (Hvidovre); the Netherlands: E. Wouters (Horn and
Maastricht); New Zealand: D. Quinn (Wellington); Norway: P. Bakke
(Bergen); Slovenia: M. Kosnik (Golnik); Spain: A. Agust (Palma de
Mallorca), and J. Sauleda (Palma de Mallorca); Ukraine: Y. Feschenko
(Kiev), V. Gavrisyuk (Kiev), N. Monogarova (Donetsk), and L. Yashina
(Kiev); UK: P. Calverley (Liverpool), D. Lomas (Cambridge),
W. MacNee (Edinburgh), D. Singh (Manchester), and J. Wedzicha
(London); and USA: A. Anzueto (San Antonio, TX), S. Braman
(Providence, RI), R. Casaburi (Torrance CA), B. Celli (Boston, MA),
G. Giessel (Richmond, VA), M. Gotfried (Phoenix, AZ), G. Greenwald
(Rancho Mirage, CA), N. Hanania (Houston, TX), D. Mahler (Lebanon,
NH), B. Make (Denver, CO), S. Rennard (Omaha, NE), C. Rochester
(New Haven, CT), P. Scanlon (Rochester, MN), D. Schuller (Omaha,
NE), F. Sciurba (Pittsburgh, PA), A. Sharafkhaneh (Houston, TX),
T. Siler (St Charles, MO), E. Silverman (Boston, MA), A. Wanner
(Miami, FL), R. Wise (Baltimore, MD), and R. ZuWallack (Hartford,
CT).
Steering committee: H. Coxson (Vancouver, Canada); L. Edwards
(GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA); K. Knobil (co-
chair; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA); D. Lomas
(Cambridge, UK); W. MacNee (Edinburgh, UK); E. Silverman (Boston,
MA, USA); R. Tal-Singer (GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA);
J. Vestbo (co-chair; Hvidovre, Denmark); and J. Yates
(GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA).
Scientific committee: A. Agust (Barcelona, Spain); P. Calverley
(Liverpool, UK); B. Celli (Boston, MA, USA); C. Crim
(GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA); B. Miller
(GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA); W. MacNee (chair;
Edinburgh, UK); S. Rennard (Omaha, NE, USA); R. Tal-Singer
(GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA); E. Wouters (Horn,
Maastricht, the Netherlands); and J. Yates (GlaxoSmithKline, Research
Triangle Park, NC, USA).
Principal investigators and centres participating in the assessment of
oral corticosteroids in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (NCT00379730): E. Bateman (principal investigator; Cape
Town, South Africa); P. Elias (Mendoza, Argentina); F. Galleguillos
(Santiago, Chile); D. Quinn (Wellington, New Zealand); and
L. Vicherat (Santiago, Chile).
REFERENCES
1 Agusti AG. COPD, a multicomponent disease: implications for
management. Respir Med 2005; 99: 670682.
2 Celli BR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes and
their clinical relevance. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3: 461466.
3 Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the
diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 2007; 176: 532555.
4 Cazzola M, MacNee W, Martinez FJ, et al. Outcomes for COPD
pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers. Eur
Respir J 2008; 31: 416469.
5 Kishore U, Greenhough TJ, Waters P, et al. Surfactant proteins
SP-A and SP-D: structure, function and receptors. Mol Immunol
2006; 43: 12931315.
6 Mori K, Kurihara N, Hayashida S, et al. The intrauterine
expression of surfactant protein D in the terminal airways of
human fetuses compared with surfactant protein A. Eur J Pediatr
2002; 161: 431434.
7 Kierstein S, Poulain FR, Cao Y, et al. Susceptibility to ozone-
induced airway inflammation is associated with decreased levels
of surfactant protein D. Respir Res 2006; 7: 85.
D.A. LOMAS ET AL. COPD AND SMOKING-RELATED DISORDERS
c
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1 101
8 Knudsen L, Ochs M, Mackay R, et al. Truncated recombinant
human SP-D attenuates emphysema and type II cell changes in
SP-D deficient mice. Respir Res 2007; 8: 70.
9 Leth-Larsen R, Nordenbaek C, Tornoe I, et al. Surfactant protein D
(SP-D) serum levels in patients with community-acquired pneu-
monia. Clin Immunol 2003; 108: 2937.
10 Miyata M, Sakuma F, Fukaya E, et al. Detection and monitoring of
methotrexate-associated lung injury using serum markers KL-6
and SP-D in rheumatoid arthritis. Intern Med 2002; 41: 467473.
11 Umetani K, Abe M, Kawabata K, et al. SP-D as a marker of
amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity, 2002; 41: 709712.
12 Ohnishi H, Yokoyama A, Kondo K, et al. Comparative study of
KL-6, surfactant protein-A, surfactant protein-D, and monocyte
chemoattractant protein-1 as serum markers for interstitial lung
diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 378381.
13 Krane M, Griese M. Surfactant protein D in serum from patients
with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Eur Respir J 2003;
22: 592595.
14 Sims MW, Tal-Singer RM, Kierstein S, et al. Chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease and inhaled steroids alter surfac-
tant protein D (SP-D) levels: a cross-sectional study. Respir Res
2008; 9: 13.
15 Sin DD, Leung R, Gan WQ, et al. Circulating surfactant protein D
as a potential lung-specific biomarker of health outcomes in
COPD: a pilot study. BMC Pulm Med 2007; 7: 13.
16 Vestbo J, Anderson W, Coxson HO, et al. Evaluation of COPD
Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate End-points
(ECLIPSE). Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 869873.
17 Lomas DA, Silverman EK, Edwards LD, et al. Evaluation of serum
CC-16 as a biomarker for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in
the ECLIPSE cohort. Thorax 2008; 63: 10581063.
18 American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 152: 11071136.
19 Medical Research Council. Definition and classification of chronic
bronchitis for clinical and epidemiological purposes. Lancet 1965; i:
775779.
20 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement
between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i:
307310.
21 Srensen GL, Hjelmborg JB, Kyvik KO, et al. Genetic and
environmental influences of surfactant protein D serum levels.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2006; 290: L1010L1017.
22 Sin DD, Man S-FP, Marciniuk DD, et al. The effects of fluticasone
with or without salmeterol on systemic biomarkers of inflamma-
tion in COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 12071214.
23 Cao Y, Grous M, Scanlon ST, et al. The innate immune molecule
surfactant protein (SP)-D is upregulated in the lung following
cigarette smoke (CS) exposure in a murine model. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 2004; 169: A832.
24 Noah TL, Murphy PC, Alink JJ, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
surfactant protein-A and surfactant protein-D are inversely related
to inflammation in early cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2003; 168: 685691.
25 Hurst JR, Donaldson GC, Perera WR, et al. Use of plasma
biomarkers at exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 867874.
26 Bozinovski S, Hutchinson A, Thompson M, et al. Serum amyloid a
is a biomarker of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 269278.
27 Papi A, Bellettato CM, Braccioni F, et al. Infections and airway
inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severe
exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 11141121.
28 Celli BR, Barnes PJ. Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmon-
ary disease. Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 12241238.
29 Wang JY, Yeh TF, Lin YC, et al. Measurement of pulmonary status
and surfactant protein levels during dexamethasone treatment of
neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Thorax 1996; 51: 907913.
COPD AND SMOKING-RELATED DISORDERS D.A. LOMAS ET AL.
102 VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1 EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL