Considering mass collection woes continuing under SEPA, we looked at solutions offered by Citi in our July 22, 1996 issue of International Treasurer, detailing the interfaces and workarounds required pre-SEPA.
Considering mass collection woes continuing under SEPA, we looked at solutions offered by Citi in our July 22, 1996 issue of International Treasurer, detailing the interfaces and workarounds required pre-SEPA.
Considering mass collection woes continuing under SEPA, we looked at solutions offered by Citi in our July 22, 1996 issue of International Treasurer, detailing the interfaces and workarounds required pre-SEPA.
Considering mass collection woes continuing under SEPA, we looked at solutions offered by Citi in our July 22, 1996 issue of International Treasurer, detailing the interfaces and workarounds required pre-SEPA.
Centralized A/P & A/R Interfaces A look at Citibanks service offerings for centralized disbursements and collec- tions in Europe. The current focal point of global cash management may be shifting away from treasury-related transactions to those related to remitting and receiving funds. According to Chris Robinson, solutions manager for Citibanks global cash man- agement services group in London, the Citibank strategy is to move away from processing transactions toward provid- ing end-to-end services that integrate treasury with commercial payment and collections management. Banks offer an integrated interface Many of the efforts Citibank and other banks are making to integrate commer- cial payment and collection activities are facilitated by corporate implementa- tions of global accounting platforms (e.g.,Oracle, SAP, JD Edwards). These platforms allow companies to centralize and automate payment and collection activities for multiple subsidiaries (see also, Pan-European Treasuries, IT, 7/8/96). The goal for banks is to provide com- panies implementing such platforms with a single interface or window into the banking system and thus position themselves to help manage the pay- ments/collections process end-to-end. In the best case, this window allows a company making payments to send a single file to their bank directly from their A/P application. This single file will instruct the bank to make payment on behalf of multiple subsidiaries across Europe. It will also include all the rele- vant remittance advice to allow the bank to forward the information to the end recipient electronically or by mail. However, not every MNC has the lux- ury of having each of its subsidiaries running on the same accounting system, much less having them integrated on anything close to a real-time basis. The implementation of a global accounting system is, after all, costly and time intensive. Some of our customers are in the midst of four- or five-year roll-outs of these types of programs, notes Mr. Robinson. Thus, Citibank is working to leverage the banking system to integrate a cus- tomers various accounting packages while still providing a centralized inter- face. Where multiple packages exist, Citibank will structure the flow of infor- mation from cash in and out to pur- chase to pay, order to cash, and track the payments made from each par- ticular entity and provide that informa- tion back to the centralized location. Since any information flowing through any bank account is posted back to one banking system, it is possible to have the information sliced multiple ways so each accounting system can pick up the information it needs. You can therefore use the banking infrastructure to get the information bro- ken out for each individual sub, explains Mr. Robinson,so each can use Citibanking to see what is happening across bank accounts. Such an inter- face allows credit control to be done at the local level, while transaction pro- cessing is managed centrally for economies of scale. Thus, electronic banking interfaces, such as Citibanking, not only facilitate monitoring of available balances, but increasingly their function becomes breaking out information on payment flows by individual entity. Citibank, with its extensive global branch network, believes it is in a supe- rior position to provide this information, because its presence in a significant number of local clearing centers gives it greater access to payment information across countries. Integrating financial systems via the banking system is a viable stepping- stone approach to a single integrated system. According to Mr. Robinson: You can collapse the bank account structure as you integrate your busi- ness. Under Citibanks current International Mass Payment (IMP) service the account structure can either be built around a centralized series of multi-currency accounts in London or accounts main- tained in each country. The payment information is transmit- ted to and from the customer via file transfer. Alternatively, for lower vol- umes, customers can use Citibanking or WorldLink, where the customer wants to automate the foreign exchange trans- actions related to its payments. WorldLink will execute the FX trades necessary for the payments and provide the relevant exchange rate information to the payer, again in a format that can be uploaded into their accounting pack- age(s). International EDI standards The key to providing an automated electronic interface is found in a banks capability to process a single file con- taining check, wire transfer, and ACH- type payment instructions. With IMP, Citibank uses proprietary standards to format the informationmaking up for the fact that there is no single European standard for each payment type. However, increasingly, corporates are using standards based on EDIFACT and related international EDI standards. Citibank has been among the first banks to support such EDI standards in its electronic banking applications. This means that in addition to making an increasing number of EDI payments, customers will also be able to send in an EDI-enabled way the advice of that credit to the bank account of the end beneficiary. The real benefit will come from multi- ple payment EDI formats. Citibank is providing support DIRDEB, a direct debit format, and PAYEXT, which facili- tates ACH-type payments. While progress in these standards con- tinues, Citibank still supplements exist- ing standards with proprietary formats to International Treasurer/July 22, 1996 Global Bank Relations 5 give its customers the kind of connectiv- ity they need with their systems. To support its proprietary standards along with those related to EDIFACT, Citibank has been working with the major accounting systems vendors to continually refine the level of integra- tion it can provide for customers. It is important that suppliers begin to work together before the client implementa- tion stage, Mr. Robinson notes. If the bank and the systems vendor can talk to each other to establish the right file definitions, protocols and end-to- end security process, it can then have a fully-integrated product offering to talk to customers about. For an integrated service to work, the customer must be able to generate from the accounting package a pre-formatted file with instructions containing a rea- sonable degree of payment data. In practical terms, this means setting up fields in your accounting systems payables supplier database, which will contain the ABA-equivalent bank codes for all the relevant recipient banks across Europe. With this information in place, Citibank can set up an interface that will automatically generate a dis- bursement file to transmit via Citibanking whenever its client runs accounts payable. Typically, connectivity is achieved through a value added network vendor (e.g. GEIS, IBM Network, and those of the major Telecoms) rather than a direct CPU-to-CPU link. Certain types of postal services (e.g., EDIPOST) are also used, which facilitate banks taking EDI messages and putting them into the mail. After all, this is still how the bulk of the remittance advice is received. Citibank is committed to working within the parameters of its corporate customers existing VAN relationship. Security controls are a consideration, as banks do not want to execute pay- ments from a file that has passed unse- cured from the accounting system to some other systeme.g., treasurys for authorization purposes before enter- ing the banking system via Citibanking. Thus, it is important to determine issues such as authentication offered for VAN transmission, where files will be sent, verification procedures to deter- mine which user is transmitting, and which entitlement groups are allowed to authorize which transactions before you embark on an accounting platform/elec- tronic banking integration solution. Exception processing Ensuring integrity with the original file is important in order to eliminate an addi- tional layer of reconciliation. According to Mr. Robinson, the new way of han- dling reconciliation is by exception pro- cessing, which works like this: Unless you hear from us, the transaction has been executed as you instructed when you sent the file out. All you see back from the bank is information on rejected items, e.g. due to insufficient funds or discrepancies. Working on an exceptions basis allows the corporate client to send out say 1,000 payments and get back 2 returns. The focus of the corporate finance staff thus shifts from dealing directly with 1,000 items to just two. By implementing this type of solution with a bank, the corporate has effective- ly outsourced much of its payments pro- cessing activities in addition to achiev- ing the economies of scale of centraliza- tion. The focus on rejected payments also provides the corporate with useful feedback to continually refine the quali- ty of its payment processes. The collections side Talk to any corporate, and you are like- ly to find a keener interest in improving collections efficiencies rather than pay- ments. Thus, Citibank is providing a similar service, in reverse, for interna- tional mass collections. The collections service is a much more difficult task since control of the payment method and information format lies on the cus- tomer side. Here again, Citibank uses a propri- etary approach to collect the relevant information from the variety of payment methods used across Europe and pro- vide customers a file to update their A/R systems. As more companies move to pay- ments using standardized EDI formats, however, the task of providing a single collections interface will get easier. For example, Citibank has had some success working with clients in certain industries (e.g. telecommunications) to repackage their business offerings to facilitate EDI-enabled centralized col- lections. The state-of-the-art today is using direct debit to directly debit out pay- ments from the A/R system, notes Mr. Robinson. For example, Citibank will take the EDI direct debit instructions in the standard DIRDEB EDI-format direct- ly from the A/R system, translate this into the local ACH format to debit the customers account, and then provide a single file of the rejected items to the supplier. The suppler can automatically recon- cile their A/P items because each one has a reference number which can be matched up against the rejected items returned. One of our customers has just moved up to 61% of their receivables across their European business to direct debit, notes Mr. Robinson. This type of automation will not work for everyone. However, over time, the standardization of payment formats will make interna- tional payment/collections interfaces available to an increasing array of com- panies willing to pay for the service. For more information on Citibanks services, call +44-171-500-5303. International Treasurer/July 22, 1996 Global Bank Relations Example: International Mass Payments Source: Citibank Global Cash Management