Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 832 views

    Reader Response Theory

    Uploaded by

    Rozi Khan
    Reader response theory rejects the idea of a single, fixed meaning of a text, instead arguing that readers create their own unique meanings through interactions with the text based on their own experiences. It became influential through Louise Rosenblatt's work in the 1930s, which argued against the New Critics' idea that texts could be objectively analyzed. Reader response theory now influences literature teaching by encouraging students to construct their own interpretations and recognize different cultural perspectives, rather than rely on set interpretations. Students learn to engage actively with texts by connecting them to their own lives.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Reader Response Theory

    Uploaded by

    Rozi Khan
    832 views2 pages
    Reader response theory rejects the idea of a single, fixed meaning of a text, instead arguing that readers create their own unique meanings through interactions with the text based on their own experiences. It became influential through Louise Rosenblatt's work in the 1930s, which argued against the New Critics' idea that texts could be objectively analyzed. Reader response theory now influences literature teaching by encouraging students to construct their own interpretations and recognize different cultural perspectives, rather than rely on set interpretations. Students learn to engage actively with texts by connecting them to their own lives.

    Original Description:

    Reader response stresses the importance of the reader's role in interpreting texts

    Original Title

    Reader Response

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Reader response theory rejects the idea of a single, fixed meaning of a text, instead arguing that readers create their own unique meanings through interactions with the text based on their own experiences. It became influential through Louise Rosenblatt's work in the 1930s, which argued against the New Critics' idea that texts could be objectively analyzed. Reader response theory now influences literature teaching by encouraging students to construct their own interpretations and recognize different cultural perspectives, rather than rely on set interpretations. Students learn to engage actively with texts by connecting them to their own lives.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    832 views2 pages

    Reader Response Theory

    Uploaded by

    Rozi Khan
    Reader response theory rejects the idea of a single, fixed meaning of a text, instead arguing that readers create their own unique meanings through interactions with the text based on their own experiences. It became influential through Louise Rosenblatt's work in the 1930s, which argued against the New Critics' idea that texts could be objectively analyzed. Reader response theory now influences literature teaching by encouraging students to construct their own interpretations and recognize different cultural perspectives, rather than rely on set interpretations. Students learn to engage actively with texts by connecting them to their own lives.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    1

    Reader Response Theory


    Reader response stresses the importance of the reader's role in interpreting texts. Rejecting
    the idea that there is a single, fixed meaning inherent in every literary work, this theory holds
    that the individual creates his or her own meaning through a "transaction" with the text based
    on personal associations. Because all readers bring their own emotions, concerns, life
    experiences, and knowledge to their reading, each interpretation is subjective and unique.
    Many trace the beginning of reader-response theory to scholar Louise Rosenblatt's influential
    1938 work Literature As Exploration. Rosenblatt's ideas were a reaction to the formalist
    theories of the New Critics, who promoted "close readings" of literature, a practice which
    advocated rigid scholarly detachment in the study of texts and rejected all forms of personal
    interpretation by the reader. According to Rosenblatt, the New Critics treated the text as "an
    autonomous entity that could be objectively analyzed" using clear-cut technical criteria.
    Rosenblatt believed instead that "the reading of any work of literature is, of necessity, an
    individual and unique occurrence involving the mind and emotions of some particular reader
    and a particular text at a particular time under particular circumstances.
    Impact on teaching literature
    Over the last several decades, reader-response techniques have become firmly established in
    American classrooms. Language arts teachers at all levels now widely accept central tenets of
    the theory, particularly the notion that learning is a constructive and dynamic process in
    which students extract meaning from texts through experiencing, hypothesizing, exploring,
    and synthesizing. Most importantly, teaching reader response encourages students to be
    aware of what they bring to texts as readers; it helps them to recognize the specificity of their
    own cultural backgrounds and to work to understand the cultural background of others.
    Using reader response in the classroom can have a profound impact on how students view
    texts and how they see their role as readers. Rather than relying on a teacher or critic to give
    them a single, standard interpretation of a text, students learn to construct their own meaning
    by connecting the textual material to issues in their lives and describing what they experience
    as they read. Because there is no one "right" answer or "correct" interpretation, the diverse
    responses of individual readers are key to discovering the variety of possible meanings a
    poem, story, essay, or other text can evoke.
    Students in reader-response classrooms become active learners. Because their personal
    responses are valued, they begin to see themselves as having both the authority and the
    responsibility to make judgments about what they read. (This process is evident in the video
    programs, when students are asked to choose a line of poetry and explain why it is important
    to them.) The responses of fellow students also play a pivotal role: Through interaction with
    their peers, students move beyond their initial individual reaction to take into account a
    multiplicity of ideas and interpretations, thus broadening their perspective.
    Reader Response Literary Criticism
    In the reader response critical approach the primary focus falls on the reading rather than on
    the author or the text.

    Theoretical assumptions:
    Literature is a performative art and each reading is a performance. Literature exists
    only when it is read; meaning is an event

    The literary text possesses no fixed and final meaning. Literary meaning is created by
    the interaction of the reader and the text. According Louise Rosenblatt a poem is
    what the reader lives through under the guidance of the text.

    Main tenets of reader-response theory


    Since the ideas underlying reader - oriented theorists are complex and in the field of literary
    criticism and theory the study of the act of reading has been referred to by several names like
    "reader response criticism", "reception theory " or "audience-oriented criticism" all of which
    differ on a given point, it would be better to enumerate here the following tenets which reflect
    the main perspectives in the position as a whole:
    1. In literary interpretation, it is the reader and not the text, which is the most important
    component.
    2. In fact, there is no text unless there is a reader, and the reader is the only one who can
    say what the text is.
    3. The reader creates the text as much as the author does.
    How text govern readers:
    Focus on how texts guide, constrain, control reading.
    Wolfgang Iser argues that the text in part controls the readers responses but
    contains gaps that the reader creatively fills.
    There is a tension between
    the implied reader , who is established by the response-inviting structures of the text
    (this type of reader is assumed and created by the work itself)
    and the actual reader, who brings his/her own experiences and preoccupations to the
    text.
    The Implied Reader
    The author creates a relationship with a reader and enables him/her to discover the meaning
    of the text.
    The tone of voice or features of the narrative voice imply what kind of reader - in terms of
    knowledge and attitude is addressed, what kind of attention the book is requesting and what
    kind of relationship of the narrator and the reader is assumed to be.
    For the child- implied reader authors try to reinforce the relationship by a very sharply
    focused point of view. (inthe centre of the story is a child)
    Techniques
    rd
    the author puts him/herself into the narrator (3 person godlike all-seer) or the
    1st person child character
    the way s/he comments on the events in the story
    by the attitude s/he adopts towards his/her characters
    Many writers cast their tales in the form of fantasy (with animal-human characters

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy