0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views

Solution To Problem Set 5

√ 2 (|1, −1; 1, 1i − |1, 1; 1, −1i) 1. The document provides the solution to problem set 5 on quantum mechanics. It examines the hydrogen energy eigenstates and applies the Wigner-Eckart theorem to calculate matrix elements of spherical tensor operators between various energy eigenstates. 2. It constructs spherical tensor operators of rank 1 and 2 from the vector operators X, Y, Z and Vx, Vy, Vz. It shows that under a rotation about the y-axis, the cartesian operators transform as expected. 3. It calculates the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for adding two spin 1

Uploaded by

88alexia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views

Solution To Problem Set 5

√ 2 (|1, −1; 1, 1i − |1, 1; 1, −1i) 1. The document provides the solution to problem set 5 on quantum mechanics. It examines the hydrogen energy eigenstates and applies the Wigner-Eckart theorem to calculate matrix elements of spherical tensor operators between various energy eigenstates. 2. It constructs spherical tensor operators of rank 1 and 2 from the vector operators X, Y, Z and Vx, Vy, Vz. It shows that under a rotation about the y-axis, the cartesian operators transform as expected. 3. It calculates the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for adding two spin 1

Uploaded by

88alexia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Quantum Mechanics 2

Solution to problem set 5


1. First remember that the hydrogen energy eigenstates |nlmi must satisfy n > l and
|m| l, so there arent too many states to acoount for. Remember the form of the
Wigner-Eckart theorem
hn0 l0 m0 | Tq(k) |nlmi = (lk; mq| l0 m0 ) hn0 l0 k T (k) knli
~ = X x + Y y + Z z, but we know that we can construct a spherical
In addition X
irreducible tensor of rank 1 out of X, Y, Z
(1)

(1)

T1 = 12 (X iY ) ; T0

=Z .

If we look at the C.G. coefficient in the Wigner-Eckart theorem, we see that, since
in our case k = 1, then all matrix elements with l = l0 = 0 vanish identically.
Let us examine the case
(1)

h210| T0 |210i = h210| Z |210i


We can write this expectation value explicitly as
=

d3 x |210 (~x)|2 z.

Remember that d3 x = dxdydz and that |(~x)|2 must be (parity) even for z
z (regardless of nlm). Therefore the expectation value must vanish. If we pay
attention to the form of the Wigner-Eckart theorem, since (11; 00| 10) 6= 0, then in
order for the expectation value to vanish, it must be that
hn0 1k T (1) kn1i = 0
so we have
hn0 1m0 | Tq(1) |n1mi = 0.
Next, examine
(1)

h210| T0 |100i = h210| r cos |100i


The angular part of this expression is (just put the right coefficient of Y00 , and of
cos in terms of Y10 )
Z
1
1
dY10 () Y10 () =
3
3
1

so using the given integral, we get


(1)
h210| T0

 2 6
a0
|100i = 8
3

and from the Wigner-Eckart theorem we know this means that


 2 6
8 3 a0
h21k T (1) k10i =
.
(01; 00| 10)
The last Clebsh-Gordan coefficient is easy, since there is only one way to get a
|j = 1, m = 0i of |1, m0 i and |0, 0i, which means that (01; 00| 10) = 1. We have then
(1)
h210| T0

|100i =

(1)
h211| T1

|100i = h21

(1)
1| T1

 2 6
a0
|100i = 8
3

(all the rest of the type h21m| T (1) |100i vanish, because of the Clebsh-Gordan coefficients, check it!). Next, and lastly, examine
(1)

h210| T0 |200i
The relevant
Clebsh-Gordan coefficient is (01; 00| 10) = 1, so we use the given
R 3
integral 0 r drR21 (r)R20 (r) to find
1
(1)
h210| T0 |200i = 27a0
3
= 3a0
and therefore
3a0
(01; 00| 10)
= 3a0 .

h21k T (1) k20i =

With our knowledge of the Clebsh-Gordan coefficient deduce then


(1)

(1)

h211| T1 |200i = h21 11| T1 |200i = 3a0 .


We have found the matrix element in terms of Tq(k) . Switching to the the original
~ is simple through
X

1  (1)
(1)
X = T1 T1
2

i  (1)
(1)
Y = T1 + T1
2
(1)
Z = T0

2. First we write our operator in terms of its 0, 1 components


+iVy
Vx
2

.
V
=
z

Vq(1)

Vx iVy

Now, we use the given form of the rotaion matrix to get

+iVy
Vx
2
sin()
1

cos()
cos()
+
1

2
X (1)

1
(1)

V
dqq0 ()Vq0 =
2 sin() 2 cos()
2 sin()

2
Vx iVy
q0

1 cos()
2 sin() cos() + 1
2

V ( cos()) iVy Vz sin()


1 x

=
2 (Vz cos() Vx sin())
2
Vx cos() iVy + Vz sin()
If now we use

1  (1)
(1)
Vx = V1 V1
2

i  (1)
(1)
Vy = V1 + V1
2
(1)
Vz = V0

we get
Vx = Vx cos() + Vz sin()
Vz = Vz cos() Vx sin()
Vy = Vy
which is just what is expected for a cartesian operator under a rotation about the
y axis.
~ , V~ we can construct spherical tensors with components
3. From the vector operators U
W1 =

(Wx iWy ) ; W0 = Wz

(W being either U or V ). We can construct a spherical tensor of rank k according


to
X
(q)
2)
Tk =
(k1 k2 ; q1 q2 | kq) Uq(k1 1 ) Vq(k
2
q1 q2

and in our case k1 = k2 = 1. Remember that in the previous homework, we have


found the Clebsh-Gordan coefficients corresponding to the addition of two spin 1,
3

so
(2)

= (11; 11| 22) U1 V1


1
(Ux + iUy ) (Vx + iVy )
=
2
1
=
(Ux Vx Uy Vy + iUx Vy + iUy Vx )
2

(2)

= (11; 01| 21) U0 V1 + (11; 10| 21) U1 V0


1
= (U0 V1 + U1 V0 )
2
1
(Uz Vx + Ux Vz + iUz Vy + iUy Vz )
=
2

T2

Now, for q = 1
T1

Similarly one gets


(2)

T0

(2)

T1

(2)

T2

1
= (2Uz Vz Ux Vx Uy Vy )
6
1
=
(Uz Vx + Ux Vz iUz Vy iUy Vz )
2
1
=
(Ux Vx Uy Vy iUx Vy iUy Vx )
2

4. (a) Let be any permutation, and denote |ui = (|1 i |2 i . . . |n i) and |vi =
(|1 i |2 i . . . |n i) then
E

hv |ui = (h1 | h2 | . . . hn |) (1) (2) . . . (n)


=

D

E

1 (1) 1 (2) . . . 1 (n) (|1 i |2 i . . . |n i)



v 1 ui .

Hence, = 1 and therefore


1 X
1 X 1
1 X

=
=
= S.
S =
n!
n!
n!
Also
1 X
A =
sgn()
n!
1 X
sgn() 1
=
n!
1 X
=
sgn( 1 ) 1
n!
1 X
=
sgn()
n!

= A.
4

(b) We prove that S |ui is a symmetrical vector by showing that for an arbitrary
permutation ,
S |ui =

1 X
1 X 0
1 X
|ui =
|ui =
|ui = S |ui .
n!
n!
n!

Similarly
1 X
1 X
A |ui =
sgn() |ui =
sgn() |ui
n!
n!
1 X
= (sgn( ))1
sgn()sgn( ) |ui
n!
1 X
= (sgn( ))
sgn( ) |ui
n!
1 X
= (sgn( ))
sgn( 0 ) 0 |ui = (sgn( )) A |ui
n!
(c) For S2
S2 =

1 X
1 X n!
1 X
S = S = S.
S =
S =
n!
n!
n!
n!


For A2
A2 =

1 X
1 X
1 X

sgn() A =
sgn() A =
A = A.
n!
n!
n!


SA
And for AS,
1 X
1 X
AS =
sgn () S = S
sgn () = 0
n!
n!
and

1 X
1 X
A = A
sgn () = 0
SA =
n!
n!

(d) Remember that a permutation is equivalent to specifying the order of the


state functions, for example, if the state functions of the independent particles
are |i i then the permutation = {1, 3, 2} means that the state-function is
|1 i |3 i |2 i. It is clear that the permutation
= {1, 2, 3}
is the identity operator. The permutations also satisfy closure. There are six
different permutations of (3) , so there are 36 closure relations that need to be
verified, I wont go through them here, here is an example
(1, 3, 2)(2, 3, 1) = (2, 1, 3).
5

It may also be proven for any n, by induction, but it is quite involved. The
existance of a reciprocal for each element is easy to verify
(1, 2, 3)(1, 2, 3) = I; (1, 3, 2)(1, 3, 2) = I; (3, 1, 2)(2, 3, 1) = I;
(2, 1, 3)(2, 1, 3) = I; (2, 3, 1)(3, 1, 2) = I; (3, 2, 1)(3, 2, 1) = I;
Indeed, the permutations (3) form a group.
5. (a) An electron has spin 1/2; thus, the eigenstates and eigenvalues are
n+

2
L

sin

nx
L

1
0

2
L

sin

nx
L

0
1

where En = 2 h
2 n2 /2mL2 . The additional degree of freedom, namely, the spin,
allows us to put two electrons in the first energy level, since this energy level
corresponds now to two different eigenstates: spin up and spin down. Thus,
there are two possible configurations for the ground state; they are depicted in
figure (1)
(b) There are three basic functions for each diagram in Fig. 13-2. For the left
diagram we have 1+ , 1 , 2+ , and for the right diagram we have 1+ , 1 , 2 .
Using the slater determinant we get
lef t

1+ (x1 ) 1 (x1 ) 2+ (x1 )


1
= 1+ (x2 ) 1 (x2 ) 2+ (x2 )
6 + (x ) (x ) + (x )
3
3
3
1
1
2

right

+ (x ) (x ) (x )
1
1
1
2
1 1+ 1
= 1 (x2 ) 1 (x2 ) 2 (x2 )
6 + (x ) (x ) (x )
3
3
3
1
1
2

and

6. Consider two identical particles of spin 1 that have the same spatial function (r).
(a) This was actually calculated in the previous problem set. For S = 2
|2, 2i = |1, 1; 1, 1i
1
|2, 1i = (|1, 0; 1, 1i + |1, 1; 1, 0i)
2
1
|2, 0i = (|1, 1; 1, 1i + 2 |1, 0; 1, 0i + |1, 1; 1, 1i)
6
1
|2, 1i = (|1, 1; 1, 0i + |1, 0; 1, 1i)
2
|2, 2i = |1, 1; 1, 1i .
6

Figure 1: The two possible states of the system in its ground state.

For S = 1
1
|1, 1i = ( |1, 0; 1, 1i + |1, 1; 1, 0i)
2
1
|1, 0i = ( |1, 1; 1, 1i + |1, 1; 1, 1i)
2
1
|1, 1i = ( |1, 1; 1, 0i + |1, 0; 1, 1i) .
2
For S = 0
1
|0, 0i = (|1, 1; 1, 1i + |1, 1; 1, 1i |1, 0; 1, 0i)
3
(b) We know that the two particles have the same spatial wavefunction. In addition, from part (a) of the question, we know that under permutation of the
particles
|s = 2, mi |s = 2, mi
|s = 1, mi |s = 1, mi
|s = 0, 0i |s = 0, 0i
so in order to make the overall wavefunction symmetric, the only allowed spin
states are those with s = 0, 2

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy