Virtualizing Exchange 2007
Virtualizing Exchange 2007
April 2008
Contents
Background ....................................................................................................................1
Exchange Performance Considerations....................................................................2
Exchange Performance and VMware Infrastructure 3 ...........................................3
Benefits of Virtualizing Exchange ..............................................................................3
Simple and Effective Evaluation, Test, and Development........................................................................................4
Improved Flexibility with Exchange 2007 Server Roles..............................................................................................5
Simple and Reliable Exchange Disaster Recovery (DR)..............................................................................................6
A Better Way to Provision Exchange Server Resources..............................................................................................7
Higher Availability with Less Complexity............................................................................................................................8
VMware VMotion for Unprecedented Control of Exchange Servers ..............................................................11
Rapid Provisioning with Virtual Machine Templates ................................................................................................12
Easier Testing and Troubleshooting with Snapshots and Clones ....................................................................13
Improved Exchange Design Flexibility to Meet Specific Requirements.......................................................14
Simplified Maintenance and Operation of Essential Legacy Systems ...........................................................15
Unlocking the Full Power of Your 64-Bit Hardware...................................................................................................15
Contents
VMware Inc.
Background
"It's not the strongest or most intelligent of the species that survive; it is the one most adaptable to
change" Charles Darwin
E-mail has become one of the most critical applications in an organizations IT infrastructure.
Organizations increasingly rely on messaging tools for individual and organizational effectiveness. As a
result, messaging administrators face a constant challenge as they continually seek to manage the
conflicting demands of availability, agility and cost.
Microsoft Exchange is the most widely used email system in the world. Its operational and performance
characteristics are well understood and best practices for design, deployment and operation are readily
accessible. Exchange continues to evolve through enhanced features and functionality and by addressing
previous limitations with each successive new version.
With its latest release, Exchange Server 2007, Microsoft has added many features that improve messaging
performance, reliability, and scalability. These provide a major step forward. However, Exchange 2007 is
still subject to many of the shortcomings inherent in applications running directly on physical hardware,
such as hardware platform dependence, under-utilization of server computing resources, lack of flexibility
to respond to changing workloads, and heavy costs associated with maintaining Disaster Recovery, Test,
and Development environments. The architectural improvements in Exchange 2007 and the
enhancements to run on the 64-bit Windows architecture cannot fully address these limitations. A new
operational platform and mindset can.
The ideal platform for Exchange would adapt easily to changing workloads, provide flexibility to
accommodate changing demands on an organizations IT infrastructure, remain reliable and resilient
despite system outages, and improve both staff and infrastructure hardware effectiveness. This
whitepaper will explore how VMware Infrastructure 3 (VI3) can provide this type of next-generation
platform for Exchange by leveraging the power and flexibility of VMware virtualization technology.
VMware Inc.
VMware Inc.
Architectural improvements of Exchange 2007 on a 64-bit platform have drastically increased memory utilization
and reduced disk I/O load by 50% or more in many cases; addressing many of the shortcomings found in
Exchange 2003. With full support for 64-bit Windows virtual machines, these same benefits are realized when
Exchange 2007 is deployed on a VMware Infrastructure 3 platform.
2.
Advances in server hardware such as dual and quad-core processors, higher memory density, and advances in
storage technology are far outpacing the performance requirements of todays applications, including Exchange.
Virtualization becomes an effective way to leverage the full resources of these systems. Recent performance
studies have shown unprecedented performance and scalability of up to 16,000 users on a single 64-bit physical
server when Exchange 2007 is deployed on VMware Infrastructure 3.1
3.
The advances in Exchange 2007 and server hardware technology have been met with similar advances in
VMware Infrastructure 3. Virtual machines can now support up to 64GB RAM and 4 vCPU and are capable of
running even the largest Exchange mailbox servers. VMware ESX servers can now take advantage of up to
256GB of physical RAM. Network improvements such as Jumbo Frames and TCP Segment offload have lowered
overall CPU usage. These and other enhancements make VMware Infrastructure 3 capable of meeting
performance requirements for even the most demanding Exchange workloads.
Third-party testing of Exchange 2007 in virtual operation has been completed with Microsofts Jetstress
and LoadGen tools, the standards for Exchange performance analysis. These tests show that performance
for a virtualized Exchange server is comparable to a non-virtualized server running on the same hardware.
This proved to be true for all Exchange 2007 server roles, including the mailbox server 2.
With concerns over relative performance eliminated, many more Exchange administrators are finding that
the flexibility, enhanced availability, and lower costs associated with virtualization are very attractive in
supporting an Exchange infrastructure. This paper discusses examples of a variety of benefits that are only
available with the VMware Infrastructure 3 platform.
http://www.vmware.com/company/news/releases/ibm_exchange_vmworld.html
HP has completed a recent performance study available at:
http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/exchange_hp_performance_wp.pdf
VMware Inc.
named XYZCorp.com. The examples follow XYZCorp.com, a rapidly growing online retailer with 2,000
employees. XYZCorp currently uses a GroupWise e-mail solution, but is considering a migration to
Exchange Server 2007.
All the required Active Directory components deployed in their own virtual machines.
All the Exchange Server 2007 roles deployed in their own virtual machines.
Several Windows XP and Vista virtual machines to test the end-user experience.
Existing servers from their GroupWise environment that are converted to virtual machines using the
free VMware Converter product.
With this simple test platform, XYZCorp is able to build a test environment that exactly models their
proposed production environment and allows them to adjust the environment as constraints are
identified. They experiment with various virtual network topologies and components and adjust their
configurations quickly and efficiently. They also simulate loads against various numbers of test users to
understand the performance dynamics of their design in a fully isolated environment. With VMware
Converter, they also are able to convert existing physical Groupwise servers into virtual machines, allowing
XYZCorp to test various migration scenarios in an isolated test environment.
VMware Inc.
Mailbox
Edge transport
Hub transport
Client Access
Unified Messaging
In smaller deployments (generally, 500 users or less), it may be possible to run multiple server roles such as
HUB or CAS on a single physical server to maximize utilization of the required 64-bit server hardware. The
tradeoff of this approach is that risk is concentrated, increasing the chance that some issue on the server
could result in an outage to multiple server roles. Larger environments will likely choose to run supporting
server roles on separate physical machines. This approach increases the amount of hardware required for
the solution, however, and typically results in a lower utilization of physical servers and increased overall
cost.
The design approach using VMware Infrastructure 3 to host an Exchange 2007 installation deploys each
Exchange 2007 server role in its own virtual machine to provide maximum flexibility (see Figure 1). As
hardware requires maintenance or workloads change, roles can be moved to other servers at any time
using VMware VMotion, which allows migration of live, running virtual machines from one physical server
to another, with no loss of service.
Figure 1. Exchange 2007 server roles in a virtualized environment
Example: XYZCorp.com is moving forward with their migration from GroupWise to Exchange 2007.
Initially, they plan to move 50 pilot users from the IT department onto the new production Exchange 2007
environment. With such a small number of users in the pilot program, XYCorp wants to run the initial
Exchange environment on a single production ESX server. As their migration continues, XYZCorp plans to
expand the environment to a larger number of ESX servers without re-installing or re-configuring
Exchange servers and without requiring any downtime.
VMware Inc.
XYZCorp purchases a 64-bit server to run VMware ESX 3.5. They deploy the required Active Directory
components and each of the Exchange 2007 roles in separate virtual machines and initially run them all on
the new VMware ESX server. When they have finished their pilot program testing, XYZCorp has
determined that their production environment will require two additional ESX servers and they will want
to distribute the virtual machines across a pool of all three ESX servers. Once the two new ESX servers are
deployed, they can re-distribute the Exchange virtual machines online at any time using VMware VMotion.
The virtual machine approach provides flexibility to meet the needs of various Exchange 2007 deployment
strategies.
VMware Inc.
Figure 2. Windows 2003 Exchange virtual machine encapsulated into a small set of files
Example: XYZCorp.com adopts more stringent disaster recovery requirements as part of their Exchange
migration project. Their new objectives state that they will restore their messaging system to full
functionality in less than 24 hours of a total loss to their primary datacenter. Designing the Exchange
environment to meet this requirement is critical to the success of this project.
XYZCorp contracted with a third-party disaster recovery site approximately 300 miles from their home
office. Two VMware ESX servers have been provisioned at the DR site as part of their recovery plan. To
enable the fastest possible recovery, XYZCorp wants to make sure that all the required components are
online and available at the DR site at all times. To accomplish this, all Active Directory servers have been
deployed in virtual machines on the ESX servers at the DR site and are online. Additional virtual machines
have been provisioned as Exchange mailbox servers and configured for the Exchange organization. In the
event of a failure, these virtual machines will connect to the replicated Exchange databases using the
database portability function in Exchange 2007. Additional virtual machines required to bring up an
Exchange environment (HUB, CAS, etc.) are deployed in a similar fashion. Thus, a complete standby
Exchange environment is online and ready, whenever they need it. A proof-of-concept test showed that
the entire Exchange environment could be restored to live operation in a few hours.
Finally, since the ESX servers at the DR site will only be heavily used by Exchange in the event of a disaster,
XYZCorp also uses them to host a number test virtual machines used by their software developers. They
use the resource pools feature provided by VMware Infrastructure 3 to make sure the test virtual machines
can only use a specified amount of the CPU and RAM resources available on the ESX servers, and will shut
these virtual machines down in a disaster scenario. This design allows XYZCorp to take advantage of the
computing resources of these servers when they are not being used for disaster recovery purposes.
XYZCorp continues to test their Exchange recovery ability on a quarterly basis and plans to test VMware
Site Recovery Manager to further automate their ability to quickly and reliably restore Exchange mail
service.
VMware Inc.
increases in the number of Exchange end users through growth or acquisition can be difficult to estimate,
but still must be factored into server provisioning and sizing decisions.
In an attempt to avoid problems associated with moving an Exchange server to a newer physical machine,
many system implementers will choose to over-size physical server CPU and memory resources during the
design of the system infrastructure to account for future growth. This can result in wasted computing
capacity, as the resources of these servers are rarely fully utilized.
This problem can be avoided using VMware virtual machines. CPU and memory allocated to the virtual
machine can be increased at any time with a simple reboot of the virtual machine. Moreover, the CPU and
memory allocated to a virtual machine can be sized more realistically, based on current workloads, and
adjusted at any time as the workload increases (see Figure 3).
Figure 3. Adding additional RAM to the mailbox virtual machine
Example: XYZCorp.com has 2,000 mail users in their Groupwise environment that will be migrated to
Exchange. XYZCorp estimates that based on current Groupwise usage, their users will likely fit into the
average Exchange I/O profile, once migrated. They follow Microsoft best practices and size the 2000-user
virtual machine with 9GB RAM and 2vCPU 3.
Several months into production they find that the new Exchange system is being used heavily and
performance requirements are higher than they had originally estimated. Additionally, they have just
acquired a new company and need to integrate 500 new users into the Exchange environment
immediately.
Because the mailbox server has been deployed in a virtual machine, XYZCorp can easily make adjustments.
During the next Exchange maintenance window, they shut down the mailbox virtual machine, add 2
additional vCPUs and 5GB additional RAM. Once powered on, the Exchange virtual machine now has a
total of 4vCPU and 14GB of RAM. Performance has improved and the 500 new users have been integrated
seamlessly.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb738142(EXCHG.80).aspx
VMware Inc.
can be deployed with minimal configuration changes and provide a robust availability
solution. These solutions can also be enhanced to provide higher levels of availability by
combining them with more traditional clustering and replication options (described later in
this section).
By leveraging the inherent benefits of a virtualization-based platform, an Exchange deployment using
VMware Infrastructure 3 offers a variety of availability options. Each of these options provides different
levels of both protection and cost, capable of meeting the unique high availability requirements of any
Exchange environment. A number of tools available from VMware, Microsoft, and third-party software and
hardware vendors can be used to facilitate both in-site and remote site availability and recovery. The
VMware Infrastructure 3 platform leverages two powerful features as the basis for building high availability
solutions:
VMware High-Availability (HA): Provides simple, low-cost protection for every virtual machine by
guarding them against physical host failure. In the event of server hardware outage, VMware HA will
automatically restart all virtual machines on another VMware ESX server (see Figure 4), minimizing
disruption to the Exchange environment. VMware HA is simple to set up and protects every virtual
machine without requiring complex clustering software.
Figure 4. VMware HA managing an ESX server hardware failure
VMware Dynamic Resource Scheduler (DRS): With VMware DRS, virtual machines are dynamically load
balanced across an entire pool of server resources. DRS collects resource usage information for all hosts
and virtual machines and generates recommendations for virtual machine placement. These
recommendations can be applied manually or automatically. DRS can dynamically load balance all virtual
machines in the environment by shifting workloads across the entire pool of ESX servers (see Figure 5).
This ensures that critical Exchange virtual machines in the environment will always have the CPU and RAM
resources they need to maintain optimal performance.
VMware Inc.
Solutions built using VMware HA and VMware DRS provide out-of-the-box high availability for the entire
Exchange environment without requiring any Microsoft or other third-party clustering software. A key
weakness in most clustered Exchange architectures is their coverage of mailbox servers only, leaving
critical supporting server roles (DNS, Domain Controllers, Exchange HUB, CAS servers, etc.) vulnerable to
outages due to hardware failure. For Exchange environments deployed with VMware Infrastructure 3, the
VMware HA and DRS solution provides a new alternative that leverages the simplicity of standalone virtual
machines while providing complete server hardware redundancy for every virtual machine, not just the
mailbox server.
VMware HA is focused on hardware failure, not on operating system or software failure. If you need
greater levels of protection and guarantees of availability for the Exchange mailbox server to handle those
situations, VMware HA can be combined with traditional cluster solutions like MSCS. A few examples for
extending the VMware HA/DRS solution are listed below 4:
Microsoft Local Continuous Replication (LCR): LCR is a single-server solution that uses built-in
asynchronous log shipping technology to create and maintain a copy of a storage group on a second set
of disks that are connected to the same server as the production storage group. LCR provides log shipping,
log replay, and a quick manual switch to a secondary copy of the data.
Cluster Continuous Replication (CCR): CCR, which is a non-shared storage failover cluster solution, uses
built-in asynchronous log shipping technology to create and maintain a copy of each storage group on a
second server in a failover cluster.
Single Copy Clusters (SCC): SCC, which is a shared storage failover cluster solution, uses a single copy of
a storage group on storage that is shared between the nodes in the cluster. SCC is somewhat similar to
clustering that was provided in previous versions of Exchange; however, it includes some significant
changes and improvements.
Third Party Software-based Replication: Several third-party replication solutions are available to
enhance availability and recovery of a virtual Exchange environment. Some of these products emphasize
availability, providing immediate failover of Exchange services, while others emphasize recovery in the
event of a catastrophic failure. In most cases, these solutions can be used either within a single Exchange
site or replicated over the WAN to a DR site.
4
The latest information on supported cluster solutions can be found in the VMware hardware compatibility list (available on the
VMware web site) .
10
VMware Inc.
Example: XYZCorp is seeking 99.99% total uptime (less than one hour of downtime annually) for their new
Exchange 2007 environment. They have been evaluating several different high availability options that
involve sophisticated cluster software which require additional 64-bit server hardware to function as the
passive/secondary cluster node. Additionally, these solutions are only designed to protect the mailbox
server and leave other critical roles such as the HUB Transport vulnerable to outage due to server hardware
failure. The additional cost and complexity of these cluster solutions is more than XYZCorp is looking for
in their initial deployment.
XYZCorp decides to avoid cluster solutions entirely in their initial deployment and leverage instead a
solution built on VMware HA and DRS. This solution provides complete protection from server hardware
failure that extends beyond the Exchange mailbox server and protects every virtual machine. In the future,
XYZCorp plans to enhance this solution by adding a Microsoft Cluster Continuous Replication (CCR)
solution that will work in conjunction with VMware HA to provide enhanced availability.
In XYZCorps testing, a physical server running the mailbox virtual machine and a domain controller virtual
machine is powered down in a simulated failure. In response, VMware HA automatically restarts the
impacted virtual machines on the surviving servers. Once the failed server is brought back online, VMware
DRS automatically re-balances the workload across all three servers. This approach meets their needs for
availability at a very low cost and is approved for use in the production system.
To ensure production-system stability during migration with VMotion, VirtualCenter requires the source and target
CPUs to be compatible, as defined in these documents:
For VirtualCenter 1.x, see "VMotion Requirements" at
http://www.vmware.com/support/vc13/doc/c2vmotionreqs12.html.
For VirtualCenter 2.x, see "VMotion Requirements" in the Basic System Administration Guide at
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi3_admin_guide.pdf.
11
VMware Inc.
downtime can also be minimized as Exchange virtual machines can be migrated to alternate hosts during
scheduled hardware maintenance windows.
Figure 6. Migrating virtual machines across ESX servers with VMotion
Example: As part of XYZCorps ongoing maintenance processes, they regularly update the BIOS and other
firmware on their server hardware. To accomplish this without disruption, XYZCorp uses VMotion to move
all virtual machines off of an affected server. Heavily loaded mailbox servers can be moved online to a
different ESX server with no loss of service. Virtual machines can even be moved onto servers from
different vendors with different hardware configurations. Once all virtual machines are migrated off of a
server, XYZCorp updates the BIOS and all firmware, reboots and then uses VMotion to move virtual
machines back on the server. They repeat this process for their entire server infrastructure. This is just one
example of how VMware VMotion can be used to provide new levels of flexibility and reduce downtime on
critical Exchange servers.
12
VMware Inc.
Example: The XYZCorp migration plan to Exchange 2007 includes deployment of a number of new 64-bit
Windows virtual machines. To streamline this task, XYZCorp builds a single virtual machine with all the
appropriate patches, updates, antivirus, etc. and creates a master template of this virtual machine. Using
the template, each subsequent virtual machine is deployed into the virtual environment in a matter of
minutes. This saves XYZCorps IT staff countless hours during initial deployment. The templates remain
on-hand in the event that XYZCorp needs to quickly deploy a new Windows virtual machine for
production, training, troubleshooting, or to meet changing service levels in the Exchange environment.
13
VMware Inc.
Any outage on a single mailbox virtual machine will impact fewer users. This allows risk to be spread
across multiple Exchange mailbox virtual machines without requiring additional hardware.
Multiple virtual machines on a single server can increase performance and scalability to
unprecedented levels. VMware Infrastructure 3 has been successfully tested under LoadGen with up
to 16,000 users on a single server. 6
Organizations can support different backup, replication, or SLA requirements on each mailbox virtual
machine.
Multiple DR strategies can be maintained as each mailbox server virtual machine can be matched with
its own DR solution.
Compliance requirements for certain users can be addressed by placing these users into their own
mailbox virtual machine.
Exchange mailbox virtual machines can be deployed along with an Active Directory (AD) domain
controller virtual machine on the same ESX server and on the same virtual switch. This design can
isolate AD traffic within a single ESX server and keep it off the physical network (figure 8).
Figure 8: Localizing AD traffic within a virtual switch
http://www.vmware.com/company/news/releases/ibm_exchange_vmworld.html
14
VMware Inc.
Example: Over time, the XYZCorp Exchange environment has grown to 3,500 Exchange users deployed
using three distinct mailbox virtual machines. One virtual machine contains the 2,000 users that were part
of the original deployment. A second virtual machine supports 700 users that came in through an
acquisition and belong to a separate AD forest for organizational reasons. This virtual machine is on its
own virtual switch, with its own dedicated NIC on the ESX server and has its own IT staff, managing their
own Exchange virtual machine independently. The third virtual machine contains mailboxes for all staff
deemed critical in the event of a disaster. This virtual machine has its Exchange databases replicated to a
DR site using array-based synchronous replication, and has a one-hour RPO/RTO in a disaster scenario.
By splitting the user population across multiple mailbox virtual machines, XYZCorp can meet different
business and technical requirements without requiring additional server hardware. These mailbox virtual
machines may all run on a single server or be moved across the virtual infrastructure as required.
15
VMware Inc.
example, smaller Exchange 2007 deployments may be able to benefit from server consolidation in the
Exchange environment. Larger environments can run very large Exchange virtual machines with up to
64GB RAM, and benefit from increased flexibility a virtualized platform provides. In any case, running
multiple virtual machines on these 64-bit systems is an excellent way to maximize the value derived from
this new, more powerful hardware.
VMware Infrastructure can also virtualize 32-bit and 64-bit Windows servers such as Domain Controllers,
Global Catalogue servers, DNS servers, DHCP servers and other infrastructure servers. These can be run as
virtual machines on the same 64-bit systems to further leverage hardware investment and reduce costs for
deployment, maintenance, support, power, cooling, and floor space.
Example: XYZCorp has been fortunate to experience substantial growth. The IT department plans to
purchase two new 64-bit servers for the Exchange 2007 environment. The servers each have two quadcore CPUs and 32GB of physical RAM. As a small company, even with recent growth, there is no way the
Exchange environment will normally use the full physical resources of these powerful servers. To fully
utilize the hardware, they run the Exchange mailbox virtual machines on the new 64-bit servers in addition
to several other non-Exchange virtual machine workloads from other parts of the organization. They are
now able to maintain CPU and RAM utilization at 65%, maximizing their value to the organization and
providing a rapid ROI on this hardware investment.
16
VMware Inc.
Figure 9. CPU utilization on Exchange ESX servers before and after consolidation
Virtualizing non-Mailbox Exchange 2007 server roles: The server role concept benefits
administrators by allowing for more modular deployments; however, this can result in underutilization
of the non-mailbox server roles when they are deployed on physical machines. You can achieve costeffective consolidation of the Client Access, Hub Transport, and Edge server roles as well as typically
lightly-utilized infrastructure components such as AD Domain Controllers, Global Catalog Servers,
DHCP, DNS, and WINS servers. Mailbox servers can remain on physical hardware, without
virtualization, if desired.
Virtualizing Exchange 2007 Disaster Recovery servers: In the physical world, disaster recovery
essentially doubles your production hardware costs. Every production physical server requires an
identical match of equipment provisioned at the disaster recovery site. Moreover, physical serverbased recovery procedures can be complex and error-prone. Virtualizing your disaster recovery site
can greatly decrease cost and complexity. First, you are not bound to the 1:1 ratio of hardware
required at both production and DR sites. You can run as many virtual machines on a physical host as
performance will allow. Secondly, you can use any hardware you want; your DR servers do not have to
be identical. Finally, Exchange disaster recovery design and test can be completely automated using
VMwares Site Recovery Manager product.
Full virtualization of all Exchange servers: With Exchange 2007, performance in a virtual machine is
very comparable to native performance and the mailbox server role is an ideal candidate to realize the
benefits of virtualization. This deployment scenario virtualizes the entire Exchange environment to
maximize the benefits of running on a VMware Infrastructure 3 platform.
The decision of which components to virtualize in a production environment depends on many factors,
including your level of proficiency with Exchange 2007 and VMware Infrastructure 3, support agreements
with Microsoft, VMware, and your hardware vendors. Regardless of the method that most suits your needs,
you can begin to maximize value from IT assets with virtualization today.
17
VMware Inc.
Microsoft Support
For the latest information on support for running Microsoft Exchange in VMware virtual machines, please
refer to the following location:
http://www.vmware.com/landing_pages/exchange_solution.html
Conclusions
The critical nature of messaging requires that any new platform chosen for hosting Exchange
environments is as reliable and proven as the traditional physical server alternative. More than 100,000
customers worldwide use VMware products. More than 50% of VMware customers running Exchange have
virtualized it for production use. The VMware Infrastructure 3 platform has the maturity, stability,
performance and functionality required to host critical Exchange 2007 infrastructures.
To meet the needs of a continually shifting business landscape, todays messaging environments must also
be highly available, flexible, and cost efficient. Using VMware Infrastructure 3 as the preferred platform for
Exchange 2007 can help you to better align your messaging environment to your business goals.
Features such as VMware HA and DRS can decrease downtime associated with server hardware failure and
allow for more rapid recovery of messaging services. Virtual machine snapshots and clones help with
troubleshooting and resolving other deployment issues and can greatly enhance efficiency in the
development cycle.
By decoupling the OS and associated applications from the underlying hardware, VMware VMotion greatly
enhances the resilience and agility of your messaging system, allowing for on-the-fly hardware
replacements and upgrades and the ability to quickly scale to changing workloads.
Finally, VMware Infrastructure 3 helps to maintain a cost-effective Exchange 2007 environment by
maximizing utilization of computing power through conservative resource requirement sizing and taking
advantage of other physical server consolidation opportunities. The robust feature set of VMware
Infrastructure 3 can help to reduce management costs as well, eliminating many mundane and repetitive
tasks and freeing up IT administrators for other challenges that are strategically important to the business.
More Information
Please visit http://www.vmware.com for more information or contact your local VMware sales
representative.
18
VMware, Inc. 3401 Hillview Ave Palo Alto CA 94304 USA Tel 877-486-9273 Fax 650-427-5001 www.vmware.com
Copyright 2008 VMware, Inc. All rights reserved. Protected by one or more of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,961,806,
6,961,941, 6,880,022, 6,397,242, 6,496,847, 6,704,925, 6,496,847, 6,711,672, 6,725,289, 6,735,601,
6,785,886, 6,789,156, 6,795,966, 6,944,699, 7,069,413, 7,082,598, 7,089,377, 7,111,086, 7,111,145,
7,117,481, 7,149,843, 7,155,558, 7,222,221, 7,260,815, 7,260,820, 7,268,683, 7,275,136, 7,277,998,
7,277,999, 7,278,030, 7,281,102, 7,290,253; patents pending.