Digital Rectal Exam
Digital Rectal Exam
Digital Rectal Exam
C 2008 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology
Published by Blackwell Publishing
ISSN 0002-9270
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01832.x
Figure 1. The normal pelvic floor at rest during rectal examination. The internal anal sphincter muscle is normally hidden by
the external anal sphincter muscles and the puborectalis in the
lateral view portrayed; the insert demonstrates the internal anal
sphincter.
821
your patient to contract or squeeze the pelvic floor muscles. Puborectalis contraction is perceived as a lift, that
is, the muscle lifts the examining finger toward the umbilicus. Many patients with fecal incontinence cannot
augment anal pressure when asked to squeeze. Finally,
place your other hand on the anterior abdominal wall
while asking the patient to strain again. This provides
some information on whether the patient is excessively
contracting the abdominal wall (e.g., by doing an inappropriate Valsalva maneuver) and perhaps also the pelvic
floor muscles while attempting to defecate, which may
impede evacuation. However, the exact value of this test
is unclear.
In 100 patients presenting to a tertiary care center for
evaluation of constipation, the rectal examination had an
impressive sensitivity of 81% for identifying dyssynergia using anorectal manometry as the gold standard (4).
Pelvic floor dysfunction causing constipation responds
to biofeedback in about 70% of cases, and this treatment
can result in a laxative-free existence for patients with
troubling outlet constipation (5); the diagnosis should
be entertained in all patients with chronic constipation
presenting to gastroenterologists, and a good rectal examination can help guide you as to whether anorectal
manometry testing is warranted.
10. Finishing up: Remove the finger and inspect for obvious
blood, mucus or pus, and note the feces color. I do not
perform guaiac testing; it is often misleading (6). If there
is persistent gaping of the anal canal after withdrawal,
this suggests there may be an external anal sphincter or
neurological defect.
Perhaps the issues surrounding rectal examinations and
physician reluctance really have not changed. In the last century William Mayo said, The examining physician often hesitates to make the necessary examination because it involves
soiling the finger. The only valid reasons why a gastroenterologist should fail to perform a proper rectal examination
as part of the clinical evaluation in 2008 are (a) the gastroenterologist has lost all of his or her fingers or (b) the
patient is acutely ill and therefore there is a clear cut temporary contraindication. Your physical examination is usually
incomplete without performing the rectal!
Reprint requests and correspondence: Nicholas J. Talley, M.D.,
Ph.D., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, 4500
San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224.
REFERENCES
1. Talley NJ, OConnor S. Clinical examination: A systematic
guide to physical diagnosis, 5th edition. Sydney: Churchill
Livingstone: Elsevier, 2006 1601.
2. Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M, et al. Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:
78390.
822
Talley
3. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Seide B, et al. Phenotypic variation in functional disorders of defecation. Gastroenterology
2005;128:1199210.
4. Rao P, Tantiphlachiva K, Attaluri A, et al. How useful is the
rectal examination in the diagnosis of dyssynergia? Am J
Gastroenterol 2007;102:S268.
5. Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller M, et al. Randomized controlled
trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
2007;5:3318.
6. Longstreth GF. Checking for the occult with a finger. A procedure of little value. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988;10:1334.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Guarantor of the article: Nicholas J. Talley, M.D., Ph.D.
Specific author contributions: N/A.
Financial support: None.
Potential competing interests: None.