Engineering Standard: IPS-E-PR-790
Engineering Standard: IPS-E-PR-790
Engineering Standard: IPS-E-PR-790
ENGINEERING STANDARD
FOR
PROCESS DESIGN OF COOLING TOWERS
ORIGINAL EDITION
JAN. 1996
This Standard is the property of Iranian Ministry of Petroleum. All rights are reserved to the owner.
Neither whole nor any part of this document may be disclosed to any third party, reproduced, stored in
any retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of the
Iranian Ministry of Petroleum.
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
FOREWORD
The Iranian Petroleum Standards (IPS) reflect the views of the Iranian Ministry of Petroleum and are
intended for use in the oil and gas production facilities, oil refineries, chemical and petrochemical
plants, gas handling and processing installations and other such facilities.
IPS are based on internationally acceptable standards and include selections from the items
stipulated in the referenced standards. They are also supplemented by additional requirements
and/or modifications based on the experience acquired by the Iranian Petroleum Industry and the
local market availability. The options which are not specified in the text of the standards are
itemized in data sheet/s, so that, the user can select his appropriate preferences therein.
The IPS standards are therefore expected to be sufficiently flexible so that the users can adapt
these standards to their requirements. However, they may not cover every requirement of each
project. For such cases, an addendum to IPS Standard shall be prepared by the user which
elaborates the particular requirements of the user. This addendum together with the relevant IPS
shall form the job specification for the specific project or work.
The IPS is reviewed and up-dated approximately every five years. Each standards are subject to
amendment or withdrawal, if required, thus the latest edition of IPS shall be applicable
The users of IPS are therefore requested to send their views and comments, including any
addendum prepared for particular cases to the following address. These comments and
recommendations will be reviewed by the relevant technical committee and in case of approval will
be incorporated in the next revision of the standard.
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
GENERAL DEFINITIONS
Throughout this Standard the following definitions shall apply.
COMPANY :
Refers to one of the related and/or affiliated companies of the Iranian Ministry of Petroleum such as
National Iranian Oil Company, National Iranian Gas Company, National Petrochemical Company
and National Iranian Oil Refinery And Distribution Company.
PURCHASER :
Means the Company" where this standard is a part of direct purchaser order by the Company,
and the Contractor where this Standard is a part of contract document.
CONTRACTOR:
Refers to the persons, firm or company whose tender has been accepted by the company.
EXECUTOR :
Executor is the party which carries out all or part of construction and/or commissioning for the
project.
INSPECTOR :
The Inspector referred to in this Standard is a person/persons or a body appointed in writing by the
company for the inspection of fabrication and installation work.
SHALL:
Is used where a provision is mandatory.
SHOULD:
Is used where a provision is advisory only.
WILL:
Is normally used in connection with the action by the Company rather than by a contractor,
supplier or vendor.
MAY:
Is used where a provision is completely discretionary.
Jan. 1996
CONTENTS :
IPS-E-PR-790
PAGE No.
0. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 4
1. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................ 5
2. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 5
3. DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................................. 6
4. SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 12
6. GENERAL ..................................................................................................................................... 13
6.5 Performance Characteristics ............................................................................................... 13
7. TYPES OF COOLING TOWERS .................................................................................................. 13
7.1 Natural Draught Towers ....................................................................................................... 14
7.2 Mechanical Draught Towers ............................................................................................... 15
8. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................................... 19
8.1 Design Parameters ...................................................................................................................... 19
8.2 Ambient Air Temperatures ........................................................................................................ 19
8.3 Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 19
8.4 Cooling Range and Water Quantity ........................................................................................ 20
8.5 Effect of Altitude .......................................................................................................................... 20
8.6 Packings......................................................................................................................................... 20
8.7 Water Loadings ............................................................................................................................ 20
8.8 Drift Losses ................................................................................................................................... 21
8.9 Windage Losses ........................................................................................................................... 21
8.10 Recirculation............................................................................................................................... 21
8.11 Hydrocarbon Detection System ............................................................................................. 21
9. WATER QUALITY .................................................................................................................... 21
9.1 Make-Up Water ................................................................................................................. 21
9.2 Circulating Water ............................................................................................................. 22
10. COLD CLIMATE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................... 22
10.1 General ................................................................................................................................. 22
10.2 Avoidance of Icing by Air Control ..................................................................................... 22
10.3 Avoidance of Icing by Control of Water Load .................................................................. 23
10.4 Effects of Anti-Icing Flow on Tower Capacity .................................................................. 23
11. SITING, SPACING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................... 24
11.1 General ................................................................................................................................. 24
11.2 Siting .................................................................................................................................... 25
11.3 Spacing ................................................................................................................................ 25
11.4 Environmental Considerations .......................................................................................... 26
12. GUARANTEES ........................................................................................................................... 29
APPENDICES :
APPENDIX
A
A.1
A.2
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
0. INTRODUCTION
"Process Design of Heat Exchanging Equipment", are broad and contain variable subjects of
paramount importance. Therefore, a group of process engineering standard specifications are
prepared to cover the subject.
This group includes the following standards:
STANDARD CODE
STANDARD TITLE
IPS-E-PR-771
IPS-E-PR-775
IPS-E-PR-785
IPS-E-PR-790
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
1. SCOPE
This Standard Specification covers the minimum process design requirements, field of application,
selection of types, design consideration and thermal process design for cooling towers.
Note 1:
This standard specification is reviewed and updated by the relevant technical committee on
Nov. 2001. The approved modifications by T.C. were sent to IPS users as amendment No. 1
by circular No. 161 on Nov. 2001. These modifications are included in the present issue of
IPS.
Note 2:
This standard specification is reviewed and updated by the relevant technical committee on
Oct. 2012. The approved modifications by T.C. were sent to IPS users as amendment No. 2
by circular No. 359 on Oct. 2012. These modifications are included in the present issue of
IPS.
2. REFERENCES
Throughout this Standard the following dated and undated standards/codes are referred to. These
referenced documents shall, to the extent specified herein, form a part of this standard. For dated
references, the edition cited applies. The applicability of changes in dated references that occur
after the cited date shall be mutually agreed upon by the Company and the Vendor. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced documents (including any supplements and
amendments) applies.
IPS
BSI
IPS-E-PR-190
IPS-E-PR-771
IPS-G-SF-880
IPS-G-ME-160
CTI
NCL-109
-
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
3.3 Approach
Approach is the difference between re cooled water temperature and nominal inlet air wet bulb
temperature.
3.5 Cell
Cell is the smallest subdivision of a cooling tower bounded by exterior walls and partition walls
which can function as an independent unit as regards air and water flow.
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
3.12 Concentration
Concentration is the increase of impurities in the cooling water due to the evaporative process.
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
3.23 Fan
Fan is a rotary machine which propels air continuously. This is used for moving air in a mechanical
draught tower and is usually of the axial-flow propeller type. The fan may be of induced draught or
forced draught application.
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
3.40 Louvres
Louvres are members installed in a tower wall, to provide openings through which air enters the
tower; usually installed at an angle to the direction of air flow to the tower.
3.41 Make-Up
Make-up is water added to the circulating water system to replace water loss from the system by
evaporation, drift, purge and leakage.
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
3.48 Plenum
Plenum is the enclosed space between the eliminator and the fan stack in induced draught towers,
or the enclosed space between the fan and the packing in forced draught towers.
3.52 Shell
Shell is that part of a natural draught tower which induces air flow.
10
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
11
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
Quantity
Unit
a
As
Ap
B
c
C
CT
C1
C2
D
g
G
h
hm
hG
hL
m2/m3
m2
m2
m
kJ/(kg.k)
H
He
K
L
m1
m2
M1
M2
n
N
p
p2
p3
p5
p0
Q1
R
Sw
Sp
T
tb
tm
tDB
tE
tWB
t1
t2
V
Vb
ve
vp
Vs
w1
w2
Wd
Wo
Ws
x
X
h
t
KaV/L
L/G
12
%
%
m
kg/(m2.s)
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
kJ/kg
m
m
kg/[m2.s.(kg/kg)]
kg/(m2.s)
kg
kg
Pa
Pa
Pa
N/m2
N/m2
m2/s
m
dB
dB
h
o
C
o
C
o
C
o
C
o
C
o
C
o
C
m3/m2
m3
m3/h
m3/h
m3
kg/kg
kg/kg
kW
W
W
m2
m
kg/m3
kJ/kg
K
Kg/m3
K
W
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
5. UNITS
This Standard is based on International System of Units (SI), as per IPS-E-GN-100 except where
otherwise is specified.
6. GENERAL
6.1 A water cooling tower is a heat exchanger in which warm water falls gravitationally through a
cooler current of air.
Heat is transferred from the water to the air in two ways:
a) by evaporation as latent heat of water vapor;
b) by sensible heat in warming the air current in its passage through the tower.
As a general measure, about 80% of the cooling occurs by evaporation and about 20% by sensible
heat transfer. The transfer of heat is effected from the water through the boundary film of saturated
air in contact with the water surface. This air is saturated at the water temperature. From this
saturated air film, heat transfer occurs to the general mass of air flowing through the tower.
6.2 In the interests of efficiency, it is essential that both the area of water surface in contact with the
air and the time of contact be as great as possible. This may be achieved either by forming a large
number of water droplets as repetitive splash effects in one basic kind of tower packing, or by
leading the water in a thin film over lengthy surfaces.
6.3 Air flow is achieved either by reliance on wind effects, by thermal draught or by mechanical
means. The direction of air travel may be opposed to the direction of water flow giving counterflow
conditions, or may be at right angles to the flow of water giving crossflow conditions. Although the
methods of analysis may be different for counterflow and crossflow conditions, the fundamental
heat transfer process is the same in both cases. In some designs mixed flow conditions exist.
6.4 The cooling range of the tower corresponds to the difference in temperature of the air-water film
between entry to and exit from the tower. Air enters the tower having wet and dry bulb
characteristics dependent on the ambient conditions. It is generally in an unsaturated state and
achieves near-saturation in passing through the tower. It may be considered saturated at exit in all
but very dry climates.
6.5.1 The performance characteristics of various types of towers will vary with height, fill
configuration and flow arrangement crossflow or counterflow. When accurate characteristics of a
specific tower are required the cooling tower manufacturer should be consulted.
6.5.2 Performance tests on a cooling tower should be done in accordance with the Cooling Tower
Institute (CTI) Acceptance Test Code and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
test code.
13
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
7.1.1.1 General
Air movement through the tower is almost entirely dependent upon natural wind forces. Water falls
in a vertical path through a packing while the air moves in a horizontal path, resulting in a crossflow
arrangement to achieve a cooling effect. Wind speed is a critical factor in the thermal design and
should always be specified. This type of tower is infrequently used in practice.
7.1.1.2 Advantage
The advantage is that there is no mechanical or electrical maintenance.
7.1.1.3 Disadvantages
The disadvantages are as follows:
a) Narrow construction results in considerable length of tower.
b) There is high capital cost due to low thermal capacity.
c) Unobstructed location broadside on to prevailing wind is required.
d) The recooled water temperature varies widely with changes in the wind speed and
direction.
e) The drift loss may be substantial under high wind conditions.
7.1.2 Hyperboloidal tower * (see Fig. 1a)
7.1.2.1 General
Air flow is affected by the reduction in density of the column of warm saturated air within the tower
shell. Secondary effects of wind velocity may influence air flow but are not normally taken into
consideration in tower design.
Notes:
* See BS 4485: Part 4 for shell geometry.
Commonly known as hyperbolic tower.
The choice of counterflow, mixed flow or crossflow arrangements is dictated primarily by site and
economic considerations.
7.1.2.2 Advantages
The advantages are as follows:
a) It is suited to large water flow rates.
b) High-level emission of plume virtually eliminates fogging at ground level and
recirculation.
c) It occupies less ground space than multiple mechanical draught towers for large thermal
duty.
14
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
d) It is independent of wind speed and direction when compared with atmospheric towers.
e) There is no fan noise.
f) There is no mechanical or electrical maintenance.
7.1.2.3 Disadvantages
The disadvantages are as follows:
a) The chimney effect of the shell diminishes as the humidity decreases and this may be a
disadvantage in hot dry climates.
b) Close approach is not economical.
c) The considerable height of shell frequently arranged in multiple installations presents an
amenity disadvantage.
7.2.1 General
Fans are used to produce air movement through the tower. This enables the air flow to be
determined independently of other process conditions. Correct quantities and velocities of air may
be selected to satisfy various design demands.
Several alternative ways of locating the fans in relation to tower structure are used to obtain specific
advantages; also there are two basic flow arrangements for air-water flow, the counterflow and the
crossflow.
15
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
TABLE 1 - STANDARD REFERENCE SHEET FOR PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS (see Fig. 1a to 1d)
ITEM
0B
NATURAL
DRAUGHT
(Fig. 1a)
D1
H1
D2
H2
----D4
H4
--H5
----D7
H7
D8
H8
D9
H9
D0
H0
D10
H10
D11
H11
CROSS-FLOW
(Fig.
D1
D2
B3
----B6
B7
B8
B9
B0
B10
B11
1b)
H1
H2
H3
--H5
H6
H7
H8
H9
H0
H10
H11
INDUCED
DRAUGHT
(Fig. 1c)
D1
H1
D2
H2
B3
H3
B4
H4
--H5
----B7
H7
B8
H8
B9
H9
B0
H0
B10
H10
B11
H11
FORCED
DRAUGHT
(Fig. 1d)
B1
H1
--------B4
H4
--H5
----B7
H7
B8
H8
B9
H9
B0
H0
B10
H10
B11
H11
7.2.1.1 Advantages
The advantages are as follows:
a) There is positive control of the air supply.
b) Minimum capital costs makes it appropriate for low load factor applications.
c) High water loadings can be maintained regardless of the size of tower.
d) Difficult duties (long range combined with close approach) are more easily attainable
than in natural draught.
e) It has a low height structure.
16
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
7.2.1.2 Disadvantages
The disadvantages are as follows:
a) Power is required to operate the fans.
b) It requires mechanical and electrical maintenance.
c) Warm, moist discharge air may recirculate into the air intakes.
d) For large multi-tower installations, the total ground area required is greater than for
natural draught hyperboloidal towers for equivalent duty. This is due to the spacing of
towers to minimize recirculation.
e) Fogging and drift may create problems at low levels.
f) Fan noise may be a nuisance.
7.2.2.1 General
A forced draught tower is a mechanical draught tower having one or more fans located in the air
3
intake, normally limited to capacities of up to 0.3 m /s.
7.2.2.2 Advantages
The advantages are as follows:
a) There is low vibration due to rotating components being located near the base of the
tower.
b) Fan units are placed in a comparatively dry air stream; this reduces the problem of
moisture condensing in the motor or gearbox.
c) Fan units located at the base of the tower facilitate inspection and maintenance.
d) Fans moving ambient air will absorb less power than in induced draught towers (but see
7.2.3.2b).
e) See also 7.2.1.1.
7.2.2.3 Disadvantages
The disadvantages are as follows:
a) It may be more subject to recirculation than induced draught towers for equivalent duties.
b) Ice may form on fan inlets during operation in winter. This can be minimized by arranging
the fan ducts at a slight angle for draining any water back into the storage basin.
c) See also 7.2.1.2.
7.2.3.1 General
An induced draught tower is a mechanical draught tower having one or more fans at the air
discharge.
17
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
7.2.3.2 Advantages
The advantages are as follows:
a) It has the ability to handle large water flow rates (but see 7.1.2).
b) It is suitable for larger cell sizes and fan sizes as compared with forced draught. Larger
fan sizes may result in greater efficiency and consequently lower power and sound levels.
c) It uses a more compact ground area than a forced draught tower of equivalent capacity
due to the absence of fans on one side.
d) Fan equipment in warm exhaust air is less liable to icing up in winter operation.
e) See also 7.2.1.1.
7.2.3.3 Disadvantages
The disadvantages are as follows:
a) Protection is required for mechanical equipment against corrosion and internal
condensation.
b) Inspection and maintenance of mechanical equipment is relatively difficult due to fans
being located 5 m to 20 m above the base.
c) See also 7.2.1.2.
7.2.4.1 General
A counterflow tower is a mechanical draught tower in which air and water flow in opposite, mainly
vertical directions.
7.2.4.2 Advantages
The advantages are as follows:
a) Normally it is an economical choice for difficult duties (long range combined with close
approach).
b) It is less prone to icing than crossflow towers (see 10.1).
c) See also 7.2.1.1.
7.2.4.3 Disadvantages
The disadvantages are as follows:
a) With induced draught arrangement the water distribution system (generally piping or
troughs with spray nozzles) cannot be easily inspected and cleaned unless the tower is shut
down.
b) See also 7.2.1.2.
7.2.5.1 General
A crossflow tower is a mechanical draught tower in which air flow is normally horizontal, in contact
18
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
with falling water drops. It is normally associated with an induced draught arrangement.
7.2.5.2 Advantages
The advantages are as follows:
a) It may be an economical choice for large water flows.
b) The plan area at basin level and the total power for fans and pumps can be less than for
other mechanical draught towers.
c) The water distribution system of the open pan type is easy to clean without shut-down.
d) It may be designed to suit low-silhouette applications for small duties.
e) See also 7.2.1.1.
7.2.5.3 Disadvantages
The disadvantages are as follows:
a) Prevention of icing during extreme weather conditions generally demands more care
from the operator.
b) The exposure of water distribution basins to sunlight promotes growth of algae.
c) See also 7.2.1.2.
8. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
A typical inquiry and suggested tender information for cooling towers is given in Appendix A herein.
8.3 Approach
Approach is a very sensitive design parameter. Closer approaches are limited by practical
19
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
8.6 Packings
The function of a packing in a cooling tower is:
a) to increase the duration of contact between the air and the water;
b) to cause fresh surfaces of water to be formed, thus increasing the rate of heat transfer
per unit volume.
20
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
Water loading shall not exceed 407 L/m per minute (10 gpm/ft ) of tower cross section area in the
horizontal plane.
1.0 to 5.0%
0.3 to 1.0%
Mechanical-draft towers
0.1 to 0.3%
8.10 Recirculation
The percentage of air recirculating on the leeward side of the cooling tower can vary between 3%
and 20%. However, the higher figure is normally associated with installations of one or more large
multi-cell mechanical draught cooling towers.
In general, therefore, recirculation of the warmed air discharged from the cooling towers is relatively
3
insignificant in mechanical draught cooling towers under 0.5 m /s capacity. For other cases
allowance should be made for the maximum anticipated recirculation.
9. WATER QUALITY
For proper use of water resources, the consumption of high quality fresh water in an industrial
cooling context should be discouraged, particularly if the quantities concerned are large as is
usually the case in OGP industries. Any installation should use the lowest quality water suitable for
the process concerned.
21
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
10.1 General
The necessity for anti-icing devices to be incorporated in the tower design should be considered at
the pre-tender stage, and the means to be employed preferably discussed between the Company
and the prospective suppliers.
The methods available for providing anti-icing facilities, and the need for such facilities, depend
largely on the following factors:
a) The severity of weather conditions at the cooling tower site.
b) The thermal design conditions. For example, a close approach tower will mean a
relatively higher air flow and a greater tendency to icing conditions in the air inlet.
c) The type of cooling tower used. A counterflow tower will normally have the packing
protected by the tower shell, with a lesser tendency to icing on the packing than a mixed
flow tower when part of the packing may be exposed.
When the tower is designed to be drained down in winter the system and tower should be designed
so that no water pockets remain. In these circumstances anti-icing devices are unnecessary.
10.2 Avoidance of Icing by Air Control
As the air temperature drops, so does the recooled water temperature. It is often the case that
below a certain temperature no further economic benefit occurs.
In such circumstances, in a mechanical draught tower, some fans may be stopped allowing the
water temperature to rise sufficiently to keep the tower free of ice. A further refinement would be
reducing fan speed in suitable circumstances, particularly where the saving in power has significant
economic effect.
In extreme conditions (about-20C) it may be desirable to provide for reversed air flow as an
22
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
effective means of clearing air inlets partially blocked by ice. In crossflow towers, anti-icing may be
brought about by reducing the fan speed so that a curtain of warm water is formed in front of the
packing, falling from louvre to louvre down the face of the tower.
23
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
ANTI-ICING ARRANGEMENTS
Fig. 2
11.1 General
The siting and spacing of a cooling tower installation should be considered from economic, thermal
and environmental aspects.
24
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
11.2 Siting
11.2.3 Recirculation
The extent of recirculation depends mainly upon wind direction and its velocity, tower length and
atmospheric conditions. Further factors that may exert some influence are spacing, topography or
geographical situations with respect to downdraught, exit air speed, tower height and the density
difference between exit air and ambient temperatures.
Note:
The prevailing wind direction, determined by the local topography, should be taken as that
obtained during periods of maximum duty.
11.3 Spacing
11.3.1 The spacing of cooling tower banks should be based upon the recommendations in 11.3.2 to
11.3.5.
11.3.2 When the long axis of one bank is perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction (see Fig.
3a), the influence on another bank will be minimized when the distance, X, between the banks is
greater than their average length. The long axes of the tower banks should be in line.
11.3.3 When the long axis of the existing tower is parallel to the wind direction (see Fig. 3b), the
influence of the existing tower on the new will be minimized if the distance, X, is greater than their
average length.
11.3.4 When the long axis of the existing tower is at 45 to the wind direction (see Fig. 3c), the
25
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
influence of the existing tower on the new will be minimized if the distance, X, between the towers
measured normal to the wind direction is greater than their average length.
11.3.5 Spacing of large natural draught cooling towers is considered to be adequate if adjacent
cooling towers are spaced so that the distance between the towers is equal to or greater than half
the base diameter of the large tower (see Fig. 3d). Should a tower be sited in close proximity to
large buildings such as the turbine and boiler houses, the nearest point of the tower relative to the
buildings should be at least one tower diameter away (see Fig. 3d).
11.3.6 Further consideration should be given to spacing and layout by making reference to IPS-EPR-190.
11.4.1 General
The effects of drift, blow-out, fogging and noise are further contributing factors that may need
consideration when siting a tower installation.
11.4.2 Drift
When towers are sited adjacent to high-voltage electrical equipment, drift may cause flashover and
icing problems. Drift can also constitute a hazard, particularly under icing conditions, on public
footpaths and roadways and may also create a nuisance in adjacent residential areas.
Drift may also create a health hazard by virtue of its bacterial population and towers should be sited
so as to avoid drift into open windows and re-entrainment of cooling water droplets in the intake air
to ventilation equipment. Effective eliminators at the tower discharge should be capable of reducing
the drift to an acceptable level (see 10.4 and also Table 4 of BS 4485: Part 2: 1988).
11.4.3 Blow-out
Blow-out is water blown out from the air inlet and occurs to a greater extent on natural draught
towers of counterflow design than on mechanical induced draught towers. It can produce a
nuisance factor with similar detrimental effects to drift, although the radius of area affected would be
smaller. Where blow-out creates a nuisance, it may be reduced by the following means:
a) diagonal partitions or a central division situated so that the prevailing winds are
prevented from blowing across the tower basin;
b) inclined louvre boards positioned around the air opening at the base of the tower,
sections of which may be removable to permit access.
26
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
SPACING
Fig. 3
11.4.4 Fogging
Fogging arises from the mixing of the warm moist air discharged from the tower with cooler ambient
air, which lacks the capacity for absorbing all the moisture as vapor. This mixing results in the
excess moisture condensing as fog.
27
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
When fogging exists, it is a nuisance factor that could create visibility and icing hazards. It is an
intrinsic feature of any evaporative cooling tower and is worst during periods of low ambient
temperatures and high relative humidity. The dissipation of fog, where it occurs, depends mostly on
the characteristics of the prevailing atmosphere.
Measures may be taken to reduce fogging, but these add substantially to the capital and operating
costs of the tower. For example, heating the moist air discharge reduces the fog as does an
increase in the volume of air through the tower.
Fan stacks discharging warm vapors at a high elevation can be a partial solution, although this may
be expensive depending on the stack diameter and the height required to derive some benefit. This
problem is solved far more easily if the tower installation is sited where the least possible nuisance
may be caused. The high-level discharge of the vapor plume from a natural draught tower generally
prevents this from being a hazard.
11.4.6 Noise
11.4.6.1 General
The likely noise level from fans and falling water in a cooling tower installation should be considered
in the context of the existing noise level at the proposed site.
It is necessary that the noise aspect be given early prominence in that to effect a significant
reduction in noise may need a design of tower quite different from and possibly less economical
than that which may have been suitable in a position of no noise restriction. For data on noise level
requirements reference should be made to the Companys project specification.
11.4.6.2 Noise abatement
If noise is to be a minimum at any point of sensitivity, the following recommendations are made:
a) The basic noise level should be as low as possible. Fan power should be low and the
water noise reduced to a minimum.
b) The towers should be sited the maximum distance from the point of sensitivity.
c) If a multi-cell mechanical draught unit is to be installed, the fans should be in line with the
point of sensitivity and the air inlets in the broadside on position.
d) Motors should be located behind the fan flares when viewed from the sensitive point.
e) In forced draught towers the fan axis should be away from the sensitive point.
f) It may be possible to analyse the sound spectrum, locate and abate discrete frequencies
and thereby reduce the general noise level.
g) Antivibration mounting may be necessary to minimize the transfer of vibration from a
tower to a supporting building. In certain cases the fan and driver may be independently
supported on antivibration mountings and flexibly connected to the tower which may then
be rigidly mounted. This has the advantage of eliminating the need for flexible circulating
water connections, make-up lines and drains.
h) Silencers on fan intakes or discharge stacks are possible aids in the reduction of noise,
but may introduce prohibitive additional air resistance.
28
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
i) The use of multi-speed drives for the fan provides for a reduction in noise level when
operated at reduced speed.
j) Employment of centrifugal fans in the case of forced draught cooling towers may
contribute to a reduction in noise level.
k) As fan noise is roughly proportional to fan driver power, the air flow directly influences the
degree of noise. Towers that operate at high L/G ratio may therefore be less noisy than
their most economical equivalent where there is a noise problem to be solved.
l) If fan noise is to be reduced on an existing tower, it may be possible to reduce the fan
capacity and therefore fan power by operating at an increased water flow and a different
heat balance. If the tower is small and of the forced draught kind, then a change from axial
to centrifugal fans may be possible.
12. GUARANTEES
12.1 The Vendor shall give the predicted performance of the tower over a range of atmospheric
conditions.
12.2 The Vendor shall guarantee that the cooling tower and its appurtenances and accessories
shall perform successfully and satisfactorily in continuous operation over the entire range of duty,
without undue noise or injurious vibration, or sagging of the Redwood wood members due to the
temperature involved.
12.3 The Vendor shall guarantee that the tower shall perform as specified in Clauses 12.3.1 through
12.3.7 below and as specified in the design condition.
12.3.1 Minimum approach temperature between cold water temperature and wet bulb temperatures
shall be guaranteed according to design figures.
12.3.2 There shall be no leakage of water from sides or ends of the tower.
12.3.3 The manufacturer shall furnish curves showing performance of cooling tower over a
considerable range of atmospheric wet bulb temperatures, for various heat loads and water
qualities.
12.3.4 The field performance of the tower shall be determined by CTI standard testing procedures
and as specified by 6.5.2. If tower does not meet the performance specifications, Vendor shall be
obligated to make the corrections without charge until performance specifications are met.
12.3.5 Drift losses shall not exceed 0.01 percent of design flow rate as per 8.8.
12.3.6 Water loading shall not exceed 407 liter per minute/m (407 L/min/m) of tower cross section
area in the horizontal plane as per 8.7.
29
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
ENQUIRY AND SUGGESTED TENDER INFORMATION FOR COOLING TOWERS
A.1 Information To Be Provided by The Purchaser
A.1.1 General
The information in A.1.2 to A.1.12 can be given by the Company for tendering purposes or in the
form of a questionnaire supplied by the manufacturer to the purchaser.
A.1.2 Location of site ...............................................................................................................
a) National grid ref. or equivalent .........................................................................................
b) Height above ground level .......................................................................................... m.
c) Height above sea level ................................................................................................... m.
d) Maximum expected wind speed .................................................................................. m/s.
A.1.3 Site details*
a) Available area: length ......................................... m; width ......... m.
b) Height limit: min. ................................................ m; max................................................ m.
c) Any other restrictions ....................................................................................................
d) Sketch of tower location giving direction of prevailing wind.
A.1.4 Type of tower required
........................................................................
A.1.5 Restrictions on unit size*
a) No. of towers ...................................each of ...............cell(s) .....................
b) Max. lifting mass .......................................................................................................kg
c) Max. operating mass ...................................................................................................... kg
d) Max. permissible size of largest section: length ...................m;
width ............m;
height ...........m;
e) Required with/without basins (delete as necessary).
* Any restrictions, particular to the site, should be made clear. Particular attention is drawn
to the following:
a) restricted access for delivery vehicles;
b) restricted access for cooling towers into building;
c) building design restrictions to air movement;
d) details of adjacent chimneys, discharge ventilation fans or process discharges.
If a particular type of tower, i.e., forced draught, induced draught, etc., is required by the
purchaser, it should be indicated to minimize pointless alternative selections being made by
the supplier.
See 8.2 Consideration should be given to possible environmental heat gain which may
increase the wet bulb temperature of the air at the intake of the cooling tower.
(to be continued)
30
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
APPENDIX A - (continued)
A.1.6 Duty of each tower .............................................................................................................. L/s
Of water from .............................C to ..............C.
A.1.7 Ambient air conditions
a) Dry bulb temperature max................................C min. .................C.
b) Wet bulb temperature ................................................................................................... C.
c) Relative humidity................................ % at dry bulb temperature.
A.1.8 Electricity supply ................................................. V ............................. phase
................................................. Hz .............................. wire
A.1.9 Noise level
A design requirement of noise rating ....................................................................................................
is being sought at the points indicated on the sketch required by A.1.3(d).
A.1.10 Extras required
A.1.11 Details of water
a) Type .................
b) Analysis if known .................................................................................................................
c) Water supplier ..
d) Details of intended water treatment if known ......................................................................
.............................................................................
e) Recommended purge rate .............................................................................................L/s.
f) Mains pressure available for make-up ......................................................................... kPa.
g) Head pressure available at tower inlet ........................................................................ kPa.
h) Expected contamination ..................................................................................................
A.1.12 Additional information
(Including legislative and regulatory requirements at site.)
A.2 Information To Be Provided by The Supplier
A.2.1 General
The information in A.2.2 to A.2.4 is required for the assessment of compliance with the purchasers
requirements and to accommodate provisions required in structural design.
(to be continued)
31
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
APPENDIX A - (continued)
A.2.2 Specification ..............................................................................................................................
a) Type of tower*
b) No. of towers ................................................. each of ........................................... cells(s).
c) Max. lifting mass ............................................................................................................ kg.
d) Max. operating mass .............................................................................................. kg.
e) Dry mass ............ kg.
f) A mass distribution diagram is enclosed YES/NO (delete as necessary).
g) Maximum size of largest section:
length ............................m; width ......................m;
height ............................m.
h) With/without basin (delete as necessary).
A.2.3 Duty of each tower .............................................................................................................. L/s
Of water from .......................................................... C to .............................................................. C.
At ambient air wet bulb temperature of ........................................................................................... C.
A.2.4 Tower packing
a) Type .................
b) Material ............
A.2.5 Casing
a) Materials ...........
b) Protective treatment(s) . ..................................................................................................
A.2.6 Basin
a) Materials ........
b) Water quantity held:
3
i) At operating level ................................... m ;
3
ii) at overflow level .................................... m .
A.2.7 Fans
a) Type ................
3
b) Air flow per tower ....................................................................................................... m /s.
c) Fan static pressure ...................................................................................................... kPa.
* The type of tower being proposed by the supplier, i.e., forced draught, counterflow,
induced draught crossflow, etc., should be stated.
Any particular treatments should be as recommended in BS 4485: Part 4.
(to be continued)
32
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
APPENDIX A - (continued)
d) No. of fans:
i) Per drive shaft ; .......................................
ii) per motor ................................................
e) Fan speed ........................................................ r/min.
f) Handling wet or ambient air.................................
A.2.8 Motors
a) No. per unit .......
b) Absorbed power ........................................................................................... kW per motor.
c) Rated power.... kW per motor.
d) Speed(s) ............ r/min.
e) Electricity supply ........................................................ V ..................................... phase;
...........................................................Hz ................................. wire.
f) Frame size .......
g) Enclosure .......
h) Manufacturer .....
i) Inside wet airstream/outside wet airstream (delete as necessary).
A.2.11 Eliminators
a) Materials ........
b) Expected drift loss .................................................................................................... %
A.2.12 Make-up
This includes recommended purge/excluding purge (delete as necessary)
33
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
APPENDIX A - (continued)
Fan Data:
1) State whether the fans are multispeed and, if so, give air delivery per fan at all speeds, at
inlet conditions.
2) State whether the fans are reversible and, if so, give qualifications for operating in the
reverse direction.
3) Fan efficiency (including gear loss).
A.2.14.5 Polypropylene, polyethylene, or polyvinyl chloride fill shall be quoted as a base bid or as
an alternative.
(to be continued)
34
Jan. 1996
IPS-E-PR-790
APPENDIX A - (continued)
35