Solution To Mid-Term Exam ADM4348M Winter 2011
Solution To Mid-Term Exam ADM4348M Winter 2011
Solution To Mid-Term Exam ADM4348M Winter 2011
Duration: 3 hours
Instructions
1. Non-programmable calculators are permitted, but you cannot share calculators.
2. Books and notes are not permitted.
3. Please do not ask the professor or the invigilator to explain or interpret questions.
State any assumptions you feel are necessary.
4. Write your answers in the booklet provided.
5. Hand back the signed examination copy with your exam booklet(s).
Note: an examination copy or booklet without that signed statement will not be graded and will receive a final
exam grade of zero.
2012
$47,250
10%
6%
44,000
26,000
On January 1, 2011, Flintstone Corp. amended its pension plan, resulting in past service
costs with a present value of $100,000. The amendment of the pension plan is expected to
provide future benefits up to the average eligibility date which is ten years from now.
There are no unamortized actuarial gains of losses as at 1/1/2011. There are also no
actuarial gains or losses on the accrued benefit obligation due to changes in actuarial
assumptions during the period under review (i.e. no actuarial re-evaluations were
conducted as Flintstone commits to having them done only every three years).
Instructions:
(a) Identify the plans funding status and the asset or liability reported on the
December 31, 2011 and 2012 balance sheets assuming that Flintstone Corp.
accounts for its pension with the deferral and amortization approach under PE
GAAP.
(b) Calculate the pension expense for 2011 and 2012 assuming that Flintstone Corp.
accounts for its pension with the deferral and amortization approach under PE
GAAP.
(c) Identify the plans funding status and the asset or liability reported on the
December 31, 2011 and 2012 balance sheets assuming that Flintstone Corp.
accounts for its pension with the immediate recognition approach.
(d) Calculate the pension expense for 2011 and 2012 assuming that Flintstone Corp.
accounts for its pension with the immediate recognition approach.
(e) Which method results in a better measure of expense over the two year period?
(f) Which method results in a better measure of the funding status on the balance
sheet?
Solution:
(a)
2011
Accrued benefit obligation, 1/1/11
Past service cost
Interest cost ($275,000 x 7%)
Current service cost
Benefits paid out
$175,000
100,000
275,000
19,250
35,000
(24,000 )
ABO, 12/31/11
$305,250
$165,000
11,550
1,650
44,000
(24,000 )
$198,200
$(305,250)
198,200
(107,050)
90,000
(1,650)
($18,700)
2012
Accrued benefit obligation, 1/1/12
Interest cost ($305,250 x 10%)
Current service cost
Benefits paid out
$305,250
30,525
47,250
(26,000 )
ABO, 12/31/12
$357,025
$198,200
19,820
(7,928)
44,000
(26,000 )
$228,092
$(357,025)
228,092
(128,933)
80,000
6,278
($42,655)
Corridor Method:
Unamortized Actuarial (Gain)/Loss at 1/1/2011
10% of ABO (larger than Plan Assets) at 1/1/2011
Surplus to amortize
0
17,500
0
1,650
30,525
0
(b)
Pension expense 2011:
Current service cost
$ 35,000
Interest on accrued benefit obligation
19,250
Expected return on plan assets
(11,550)
Amortization of past service cost ($100,000 / 10)
10,000
Amortization of Actuarial (Gain)/Loss (see corridor method above)
0
$52,700
Pension expense 2012:
Current service cost
Interest on accrued benefit obligation
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of past service cost ($100,000 / 10)
Amortization of Actuarial Gain (see corridor method above)
$47,250
30,525
(19,820)
10,000
0
$ 67,955
(c)
2011
Accrued benefit obligation, 1/1/11
Past service cost
Interest cost ($275,000 x 7%)
Current service cost
Benefits paid out
$175,000
100,000
275,000
19,250
35,000
(24,000 )
ABO, 12/31/11
$305,250
$165,000
11,550
1,650
44,000
(24,000 )
$198,200
$(305,250)
198,200
(107,050)
0
0
($107,050)
2012
Accrued benefit obligation, 1/1/12
Interest cost ($305,250 x 10%)
Current service cost
Benefits paid out
$305,250
30,525
47,250
(26,000 )
ABO, 12/31/12
$357,025
$198,200
19,820
(7,928)
Contributions
Benefits paid out
44,000
(26,000 )
$228,092
$(357,025)
228,092
(128,933)
0
0
($128,933)
$ 35,000
19,250
(13,200)
100,000
0
(d)
$141,050
Pension expense 2012:
Current service cost
Interest on accrued benefit obligation
Actual return on plan assets (6% of $198,200)
Past service cost
Actuarial (Gain)/Loss
$47,250
30,525
(11,892)
0
0
$ 65,833
(e)
The deferral and amortization approach results in a more stable expense number
on the income statement. The deferral and amortization approach expense may
increase each year, yet the expense under the immediate recognition approach is
much more volatile.
(f)
Lease inception
May 2, 2011
$?
$100,000
10 years
$415,000
$327,500
12%
12%
$14,500
The leased equipment reverts to Galt Manufacturing at the end of the lease, although
Mulholland has an option to purchase it at its expected fair value at that time. Galt also
has concluded that the credit risk of Mulholland is normal and there are no
unreimbursable costs associated with this lease.
Instructions:
(a) Using time value of money tables or a financial calculator calculate the lease
payment determined by the lessor to provide a 12% return.
(b) Prepare a lease amortization table for Galt Manufacturing, the lessor, covering the
entire term of the lease.
(c) Assuming that Galt Manufacturing has a December 31 year end, and that
reversing entries are not made, prepare all entries made by the company up to and
including May 2, 2013.
(d) Identify the balances and classification of amounts that Galt Manufacturing will
report on its December 31, 2011 balance sheet, and the amounts on its 2011
income statement and statement of cash flows related to this lease.
(e) Assuming that Mulholland has a December 31 year end, and that reversing entries
are not made, prepare all entries made by the company up to and including May 2,
2013. Assume payments of executory costs of $14,000, $14,400, and $14,950
covering fiscal years 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively.
(f) Identify the balances and classification of amounts that Mulholland will report on
its December 31, 2011 balance sheet, and the amounts on its 2011 income
statement and statement of cash flows related to this lease.
(g) On whose balance sheet should the equipment appear? On whose balance sheet
does the equipment currently get reported?
Solution:
(a)
For the purpose of calculating the lease payment that will yield a 12% return
to Galt, the residual value guaranteed by a third party will be included in the
calculations below:
Yields $72,341
(b)
Galt Manufacturing Ltd. (Lessor)
Lease Amortization Schedule
Date
5/2/11
5/2/11
5/2/12
5/2/13
5/2/14
5/2/15
5/2/16
5/2/17
5/2/18
Annual
Lease
Payment
Plus RV
$72,341
72,341
72,341
72,341
72,341
72,341
72,341
100,000
$606,387
Interest
(12%) on Net
Investment
$41,119
37,372
33,176
28,476
23,213
17,317
10,714
$191,387
10
Net
Investment
Recovery
$72,341
31,222
34,969
39,165
43,865
49,128
55,024
89,286
$415,000
Balance
of Net
Investment
$415,000
342,659
311,437
276,468
237,303
193,438
144,310
89,286
0
(c)
5/2/11
5/2/11
12/31/11
5/2/12
5/2/12
12/31/12
5/2/13
5/2/13
..................................................................... 72,341
Lease Payments Receivable.....................
..................................................................... 72,341
Lease Payments Receivable.....................
..................................................................... 72,341
Lease Payments Receivable.....................
11
415,000
327,500
191,387
72,341
27,413
13,706
72,341
24,915
12,457
72,341
(d)
As at and for the period ending December 31, 2011
Balance sheet:
Current assets
Net investment in leases
Noncurrent assets (investments)
$ 72,341
297,731 *
$ 415,000
327,500
87,500
27,413
$ 72,341
(e) Mulholland Corp. would account for the lease as an operating lease since:
Using a financial calculator:
PV
$ ?
I
12%
N
7
PMT
$ 72,341
FV
$0
Type
1
Yields $369,764
The lease term (7 years) is less than 75% of the economic life (10 years) of the leased
asset. The lease term is 70% (7 10) of the assets economic life. There is no
bargain purchase option and the present value of minimum lease payments of
$72,341 represents 89% ($369,764 / $415,000) of the fair value at May 2, 2011 of
$415,000 falling short of the criteria of 90% to treat the lease as a capital lease.
12
5/2/11
12/31/11
5/2/12
12/31/12
72,341
48,227
72,341
48,227
14,400
14,400
24,114
72,341
48,227
5/2/13
14,000
5/2/12
14,000
Rent Expense...................................................
13
24,114
72,341
48,227
14,950
14,950
24,114
Prepaid Rent.................................................
($72,341 X 4/12)
5/2/13
24,114
72,341
72,341
(f)
As at and for the period ending December 31, 2011
Balance sheet:
Current assets:
Prepaid rent
$ 24,114
Statement of Income:
Rent expense
Executory costs
$ 48,227
14,000
$ (72,341)
(g) In this set of circumstances, the equipment is on neither the lessors (Galts)
nor the lessees (Mulhollands) balance sheets. The equipment should likely
be on the balance sheet of the lessor as they have avoided recording the lease
as an operating lease by involving a third party in the guaranteed residual
value. In this case, the present value of minimum lease payments represents
89% of the fair value of the asset. This is very close to the 90% capitalization
criteria guideline. The 90% criteria is not an absolute rule and therefore
accountants should look beyond the numbers to the substance of the
transaction to determine the accounting treatment of the lease; in this case
capitalization of the lease may be a more meaningful presentation.
14
15
3.6 On July 1, 2012, Nickel Ltd leases equipment from Dime Corp, under an eight year
capital (finance) lease. Equal annual payments of $100,000 are required,
payable on July 1 of each year. The first payment is made on July 1, 2012. The
appropriate rate of interest for this lease is 9%, and title will transfer to Nickel at
the end of the lease contract. The fair value of the equipment is $620,000 and
the cost in Dime's accounting records is $550,000. The present value of the
lease payments is $620,000. What is the amount of gross profit and interest
income that Dime would record for the year ended December 31, 2012?
a. $0 and $23,400.
b. $0 and $36,000.
c. $70,000 and $23,400.
d. $70,637 and $23,400.
c. $620,000 $550,000 = $70,000.
($620,000 $100,000) .09 x 6/12 = $23,400.
3.7 For a sales-type lease (called a manufacturer or dealer lease in IFRS),
a. the sales price includes the present value of the unguaranteed residual value.
b. the present value of the guaranteed residual value is deducted to determine
the cost of goods sold.
c. the gross profit will be the same whether the residual value is guaranteed or
unguaranteed.
d. cost of goods sold is not recognized.
3.8 Daikon Ltd. received the following information from its pension plan trustee
concerning their defined benefit pension plan for the year ended December 31,
2012. The corporation uses the deferral and amortization approach.
Jan 1, 2012
$2,100,000
2,400,000
270,000
For 2012, the current service cost is $180,000 and the amortization of the past
service costs is $30,000. The interest rate on the liability is 10% and the expected
rate of return on plan assets is 9%. What is the amount of pension expense for
2012 assuming current service costs, contributions and benefits are at the end of
the year and no actuarial gains or losses are accounted for?
a. $265,500.
b. $261,000.
c. $216,000.
d. $180,000.
b. $180,000 + $30,000 + ($2,400,000 .10) ($2,100,000 .09) = $261,000.
16
3.9 On January 1, 2012, Adams Corp signed a ten-year non-cancellable lease for
machinery. The terms of the lease called for Adams to make annual payments
of $100,000 at the end of each year for ten years with title to pass to Adams at
the end of the lease period. Adams accordingly accounted for this lease
transaction as a capital (finance) lease. The machinery has an estimated useful
life of 15 years and no residual value. Adams uses straight-line depreciation for
all of its property, plant and equipment. The lease payments were determined to
have a present value of $671,008 at an effective interest rate of 8%. It was also
determined that the fair value of the machinery on January 1, 2012 was
$671,008. With respect to this lease, for the year ending December 31, 2012,
Adams should report (rounded to the nearest dollar)
a.
b.
c.
d.
3.10 Presented below is pension information related to Cantaloupe Ltd. for the year 2012.
The corporation uses the immediate recognition approach.
Current service cost
Actual return on plan assets
Interest on accrued benefit obligation
Actuarial experience loss
Past service costs agreed to at Jan 1/12
$900,000
210,000
390,000
90,000
165,000
17