Anglo-Eastern Lookout Issue01 14.1400560387
Anglo-Eastern Lookout Issue01 14.1400560387
Anglo-Eastern Lookout Issue01 14.1400560387
Dear Colleagues,
As we celebrate the 40th year
of the inception of Anglo
Eastern Ship Management,
we all stand tall with pride of
being part of the Anglo family.
I take this opportunity to take
forward the theme of the year
Proud to be Mariner. I look
forward to another successful
year with combined efforts
from us all.
Weakness in bridge team
organization and management
has been cited as a major
cause for marine casualties
worldwide. This issue alerts
us all towards complacency
and neglect of basic practices
of a bridge team which can
lead to severe consequences.
It has become more important
in todays electronic age to
redefine the ways and means
of vigilance.
Wishing you safe voyages.
Pradeep Chawla
Fire Door
Why do we really need Fire doors on board ships?
When did they begin to be applicable on board
ships?
Lets have a look to the history briefly which brought
about the existence of fire doors:
In 1914 Maritime states developed the first global safety
agreement for shipping, the International Convention for
the Safety Of Life At Sea (SOLAS).
In 1934 Fire on board the RMS Morro Castle resulted in
the introduction of fire retardant materials, automatic fire
doors and ship wide fire alarms.
1974 SOLAS tightened fire safety provisions for tankers
and defined minimum standards for construction and
equipment to be carried on ships.
Maintenance/Inspection
A fire door cannot perform on its own. Its task relies on
the correct operation of other components such as the
door frame, hinges, closers, seals and glazing systems
which must be compatible with the door and which make
up the fire door assembly. Hence regular inspection and
maintenance of the fire doors is required.
The following points should be checked for Fire Doors:
1. Each fire door should be properly marked as FIRE
DOOR and with proper ID number.
2. Check condition of door for corrosion, buckling or any
other damage.
Additional packing
in use for the fire
door. The door does
not seal properly.
Damaged
packing
Signs showing
misalignment
of the door
Be sure to check the Fire Training Manual Chapter5 on Fire Doors and
Fire Maintenance Manual Chapter 10 on Fire door maintenance
Regulation Updates
1st January 2014: Tokyo MoU on Port State Control
(PSC) introduced a New Inspection Regime (NIR) from
1st January 2014, replacing the existing ship target factor
system. (RU-78). See SQ/MSG/034AS/14- Tokyo MoU:
New Inspection Regime - Ship Risk Profile Calculator
for determining the Ship risk profile
1st January 2014: The amendment to the FSS code
adopted by the resolution MSC.327(90) on 25th May 2012
entered in force. The amendments include amendment
to Chapter 6 Fixed foam fire-extinguishing systems and
Chapter 8 Automatic sprinkler, fire detection and fire alarm
systems. (RU-88)
14th January 2014: AK-APC-NTV operating procedures
for Cargo and Passenger Non Tank vessels were issued
to vessel. In case the vessel is operating in Alaska
waters or is in transit within the boundaries of U.S.
EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone) while calling to or
from a US port, the vessel will require to be enrolled
with Alaska Alternative Planning Criteria for Non Tank
vessels. (US-65- SQ/MSG/009AS/14 refers)
Shipboard Concentrated
QHSE Campaign No. 3
Summary of deficiencies noted in the campaign
conducted from July to Oct 2013 Prevention of
Injuries and Heat Stress management
Prevention of Injuries
1. On some vessels the entire mooring area has
not been painted with non skid paint, to prevent
mooring crew slipping on deck. (SBP 7.2.1)
2. Some portable ladders were found not fitted with
rubber stoppers at lower end in order to prevent
shifting. (H & S 7.1.4.1)
3. It was observed that in some cases the ship staff
did not keep one hand free to grasp the handrail
when using stairs and companionways. (H & S
7.1.9, COSWP 14.2.6)
4. The One Minute Hazard Identification Guide
and PPE slide guide are not used by some crew
members for carrying out a risk assessment for
routine tasks. (H & S 3.6.3 and H & S 6.1.2.14)
5. It was observed that on some vessels the correct
type of gloves was not selected for the type of work
being undertaken or when a particular substance is
being handled. (H & S 6.1.2.4)
6. The booby hatch covers were not secured using all
securing pins when opened.
7. Some cases were observed where the ship staff
had overloaded the electrical socket with a multiple
plug point. (H & S 5.6.2.2)
of
Oral
rehydration
salts/electrolyte