Nato Psyops Doctrine

NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED
AJP-3.10.1(A)
AJP-3.10.1(A)
ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR

PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
AJP-3.10.1(A)
ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR

PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
OCTOBER 2007
i
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
ii
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
iv
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
RESERVED FOR NATIONAL LETTER OF PROMULGATION
v
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
vi
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
RECORD OF NATIONAL RESERVATIONS

CHAPTER
Preface
1
2
3
4
Annex A
Annex B
Annex C
Annex D
RECORD OF RESERVATIONS BY NATIONS

USA
USA
USA
USA
vii
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
RECORD OF RESERVATIONS & COMMENTS

NATION
EST
RESERVATIONS
Reservation:
PSYOPS and Public Information elements are not separated in the structure of the
Estonian Defence Forces. Estonian deployable PSYOPS elements will follow the
principles of STANAG 2508, including separation of PSYOPS and PI military
functions, on NATO operations. STANAG 2508 is also implemented as the basis for
national PSYOPS training in the Estonian Defence Forces.
Reservations:
USA
a. The United States does not subscribe to the use of the term Information Domain
in footnote 1 on page 1-8, or the language the two domains of INFO OPS (counter
command and information protection) as used in paragraph A111 b. Doctrinally, the
United States only recognises domains as the geographic bounded areas of air, land,
sea, and space. Because the footnote provides a non-NATO approved definition for
information activities that comes from a white paper, it should be removed. The
United States interprets the phrase the two domains of INFO OPS in paragraph
A111b. to mean the two aspects of INFO OPS and it should be amended with the
next revision or change.
b. The United States does not subscribe to establishing a combined joint force
psychological operations component command (CJFPOCC) as described/used in
paragraphs 0304, 0305, 0306a., 0306b., 0307a, 0310, 0311, Figure 3-1, 0313b.,
0313c., 0314, 0315, A11d.(4)(b), A111e., A114, A120.3.c.(1)(a), A122, B121,
glossary definitions of framework nation and lead nation, and abbreviation listing.
The CJFPOCC is not supported by US psychological operations (PSYOP) doctrine or
policy. US doctrine and policy reflect a functional command as represented by the
CJPOTF. PSYOP-trained personnel and assets are high-demand, low-density, and
the formation of a CJFPOCC would further strain these limited resources by requiring
additional PSYOP personnel to fill staff and liaison positions. Furthermore, the
CJFPOCC concept has never been used in NATO operations, nor has it been
validated through modeling, experimentation and exercise. Therefore, the formation
of a CJFPOCC is not doctrine. These issues make the effectiveness and
sustainment of a CJFPOCC highly questionable and all references to it should be
removed from this AJP with Change 1 upon completion of the ratification process.
viii
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
RECORD OF CHANGES
Change
Date
Date
Entered
Effective
Date
By Whom
Entered
ix
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
x
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Contents
Preface
IX
XI
Chapter 1 - An Overview of psychological operations
1-1
Section I - Introduction
Section II - The Global information environment
Section III - Psychological operations and the information
Environment
Section IV - Categories of PSYOPS
Section V - Principles of PSYOPS
Section VI - Counter PSYOPS
Section VII - Psychological operations relationships with other
Military activities
1-1
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-5
1-7
1-8
Chapter 2 - Organisational responsibility for PSYOPS

Section I - General
Section II - Responsibilities
2-1
2-1
Chapter 3 - Command and Control of PSYOPS

Section I - General
Section II - Organisation of PSYOPS forces
Section III - Command relationships
3-1
3-1
3 - 10
Chapter 4 - PSYOPS and the Range of Military Operations

Section I - General
Section II - PSYOPS in support of operations
Annex A -
Psychological Operations Planning
Section II - PSYOPS in the NATO operational planning process
Section III - Formats for PSYOPS planning outputs
Annex B -
4-1
4-1
A-1
A-3
A - 12
Media for PSYOPS Use

xi
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Section I Section II Section III Section IV Section V Annex C -
General
Visual media
Audio media
Audio-visual media
Product design review
B-1
B-2
B-6
B - 11
B - 15
Attitudes and Behaviour
Section I Section II Section III Section IV -
The motivation of the individual

Socialization and individualization
Social groups
Communication
C-1
C-3
C-6
C-9
Annex D - Counter PSYOPS Techniques and Procedures

Section I - Analysis
Section II - Techniques
Section III - Procedures
D-1
D-3
D-4
Glossary of Definitions
Glossary - 1
List of Abbreviations
Abbreviations - 1
Reference Documents
References - 1
List of Effective pages
LEP - 1
xii
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
PREFACE
0001. Doctrine is a framework of principles, practices, and procedures, the understanding
of which provides a common basis for action. It evolves as its political and strategic
foundation changes, and in the light of new technology, the lessons of experience,
and the insights of operational analysis. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)
policy and doctrine forms the fundamental principles by which NATO military forces
guide their actions in support of objectives. It is authoritative, but requires
judgement in application.
0002. Although NATO psychological operations (PSYOPS) doctrine is primarily intended
for NATO forces, it could be applied with adaptations where necessary, as agreed
upon participating nations, for operations under the umbrella of the European Union
(EU), or a coalition of NATO and non-NATO nations, when such utilisation would be
in NATOs interests. Interoperability between NATO nations is based upon NATO
standardisation agreements and publications; many of the subjects covered in
these may have to be reconsidered in the planning of PSYOPS with non-NATO
forces.
0003. The purpose of Allied Joint Publication (AJP)-3.10.1 Allied Joint Doctrine for
Psychological Operations is to address the planning and conduct of military
PSYOPS in support of NATO activities. PSYOPS, as one of the key contributors to
most information operations (INFO OPS) activities, will achieve their greatest effect
when coordinated within the larger INFO OPS plan and supporting a much broader
information strategy1. The new construct of INFO OPS is focused on affecting will,
understanding, and capability through the three activities of influence, countercommand, and information protection. It must be noted that PSYOPS has
influence activity as its mission; and by influencing target audiences (TA)
directly, PSYOPS, in turn, has indirect effects on understanding and capability.
0004. AJP-3.10.1 focuses primarily on the operational level, but may be used as a
reference at all levels. It is intended principally for use by a joint force commander
(JFC), combined joint task force (CJTF) commander, deployable joint task force
(DJTF) commander and those on their staff with PSYOPS responsibilities, but also
addresses the roles, responsibilities, links, and required products from the strategic,
operational and tactical commands. It is deliberately broad and is designed for the
guidance of all PSYOPS forces supporting NATO operations and those participating
in NATO-led operations. The guidance in this publication is authoritative, and as
such will be followed in NATO-led operations except when, in the judgement of the
commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise.
1
The term information strategy (its concept and definition) is not yet endorsed through official NATO policy.
Its use here, however, reflects current thinking on this subject and an effects-based approach to operations,
and is coherent with current policy and doctrine initiatives in areas such as the effects-based approach and
INFO OPS.
xiii
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
0005. AJP-3.10.1 constitutes one step in the development of NATO documents covering
PSYOPS policy, doctrine as well as techniques, tactics and procedures. AJP-3.10.1
describes the principles of PSYOPS, and the organisation and structure required to
implement them effectively. It flows directly from MC 402, which lays down NATO
policy for PSYOPS and its application at the strategic level. Additionally, within the
overall NATO publication hierarchy, the Allied Joint Operations Doctrine (AJOD)
Working Group, who has authority in these matters, has directed that AJP-3.10.1 be
vertically harmonised under AJP-3.10. This reflects NATO policy that PSYOPS fall
within the larger construct of INF OPS.
0006. For more detailed information on PSYOPS planning as described in annex A of this
publication, consult the Bi-SC Functional Planning Guide for PSYOPS
(SHOPJ/1223/03) dated 13 Jan 2003.
0007. PSYOPS training and education are not addressed in detail in AJP-3.10.1. For
information concerning these two activities, refer to Allied Command Transformation
(ACT) publication ACT Directive 75-2/M PSYOPS Joint Functional Area Training
Guide dated 24 Feb 2006. ACT Dir 75-2/M provides guidelines on the processes
for developing, maintaining, using, and evaluating PSYOPS training and education.
xiv
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
CHAPTER 1
AN OVERVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
Section I Introduction
0101. Aim. The aim and function of this document is to outline NATO psychological
operations (PSYOPS) doctrine, to highlight its role as a force multiplier and combat
reducer in support of the commander across the spectrum of conflict, and to
describe its place in supporting the achievement of NATO goals and objectives. It is
focused at the operational level and below. However, it describes actions that
should be taken at all levels.
0102. NATO Definition of PSYOPS. MC 402 (17 April 2003) - NATO PSYOPS Policy
defines PSYOPS as: Planned psychological activities using methods of
communications and other means directed to approved audiences in order to
influence perceptions, attitudes and behaviour, affecting the achievement of political
and military objectives. Whilst some Allied countries differ in their national
definitions of PSYOPS, all have agreed to the definition contained in MC 402, on
which this AJP is founded.
Section II The Global information environment

0103. The changing global security situation has seen a shift in emphasis from the
certainties of super-power confrontation towards more complex interactions of state
and non-state actors. Globalisation and competition for resources combine with
ideological, religious and cultural distinctions to increase uncertainty. In addition,
NATO society, partly driven by media exposure to global issues, has elevated
expectations of a more benevolent manner of engagement that conforms to a moral
code and ever tightening legal constraints. Concurrently, there has been an
information revolution that has ushered in an age of computer-based decisionmaking tools, the Internet and mobile telephones. This relatively new information
environment comprises information, actors and systems that enable the use of
information. The actors include leaders, decision-makers, individuals, and
organizations. Information systems include the materials and systems employed to
collect, apply, or disseminate information. The information environment itself is
where humans and automated systems observe, orient, decide and act upon
information, and is therefore the principal environment of decision making. It is
made up of three interrelated dimensions: physical, information, and cognitive.
1-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Section III - Psychological operations and the information environment
0104. The psychological dimension of conflict is as important as the physical. Conflict is a
struggle of wills, that takes place in peoples minds as well as on the battlefield.
The attitudes and behaviour of people (friend, foe and the undecided or
uncommitted) may be central to determining the outcome of conflict and the nature
of the post-conflict environment. Therefore it is necessary to understand the
motivation of various target audiences -- leaders, military forces, populations -- in
order to shape their perceptions, affect their will and to persuade them to accept the
outcome desired by NATO. The employment of any element of power projection,
particularly the military element, has always had a psychological dimension.
PSYOPS, as a key element of most INFO OPS activity, are a vital part of the broad
range of NATO diplomatic, military, economic, and informational activities.
0105. PSYOPS are enhanced by the expansion of mass communication capabilities.
NATO may multiply the effects of its military capabilities by communicating directly
to its intended targets. The effectiveness of this communication depends on the
perception of the communicator's credibility and capability to carry out promises or
threatened actions in a manner that will be significant to the cultural norms and
attitude of the individuals targeted. The employment of any NATO element has a
psychological dimension. Perceptions of NATO capabilities are fundamental to
strategic deterrence. The effectiveness of deterrence and other strategic concepts
hinges on the ability to influence the perceptions of others. It is important not to
confuse psychological impact of military operations with planned psychological
operations, although the two can be mutually supporting and should be anticipated
and coordinated.
0106. PSYOPS constitute a planned process of conveying messages to selected groups,
known as target audiences, to promote particular themes that result in desired
attitudes and behaviour that affect the achievement of political and military
objectives. A target audience is defined by NATO as an individual or group
selected for influence or attack by means of psychological operations (AAP-6).
Given the potential benefit of PSYOPS as an effective force multiplier and combat
reducer, commanders at all levels should always consider its use in support of their
military aims and objectives. The three basic aims of PSYOPS are to:
a.
Weaken the will of the adversary or potentially adversary target audiences.
b.
Reinforce the commitment of friendly target audiences.
c.
Gain the support and cooperation of uncommitted or undecided audiences.
0107. PSYOPS is integrated into as an integral part of the overall operational effort
throughout the theatre in support of combined, joint operations mission
accomplishment.
1-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Section IV Categories of PSYOPS

0108. General. MC 402, NATO PSYOPS Policy, identifies three categories for the
conduct of psychological operations: strategic, crisis response and combat. These
three categories have been established primarily to facilitate division of
responsibility between national authorities, host nations (HNs), the Alliance and
NATO military authorities (NMA). Useful as they are in this respect, it should be
kept in mind that PSYOPS do not lend themselves to easy compartmentalization. In
practice, there is much essential overlap between the categories of activities.
a.
b.
Strategic psychological operations (SPO)

(1)
Definition: Planned psychological operations that pursue objectives

to gain the support and cooperation of supportive and neutral
audiences and to reduce the will and the capacity of hostile or
potentially hostile audiences to commit aggressive action, and
contribute to crisis management and deterrence in support of
diplomatic actions.
(2)
Description: SPO are high level (i.e. national government level)

PSYOPS directed toward friendly, adversary, potentially adversary or
neutral audiences. The term countries shall be interpreted in a
broad sense, including individual groups within a country, e.g. a
religious based group in opposition to a countrys government. The
objectives of SPO are long-term and political in nature; they aim to
undermine an adversary's, or a potential adversary's, readiness for
conflict, will to fight and to reduce his war-making capability while
gaining the support and cooperation of neutral and friendly
populations. Conduct of SPO is a national responsibility.
(3)
Limitations. NATO does not carry out strategic PSYOPS; however, the
North Atlantic Council (NAC) can provide a forum to coordinate SPO
among nations with NATO military activities. If the strategic
commander (SC) identifies a need for initiation of SPO, a request can
be forwarded to the MC for submission to the NAC and actions by the
nations.
Crisis response psychological operations (CRPO)

(1)
Definition: Planned psychological operations conducted as an
integral part of Crisis Response Operations, designed to create a supportive
atmosphere and a willingness to cooperate among the parties in conflict and
1-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
civilian population in the Joint Operations Area (JOA), in order to assist in the
achievement of the mission objectives and protect the force.
(2)
Description: CRPO are conducted at the operational and tactical level
and are the responsibility of the NATO commander. They are an integral
part of military operations, being in consonance with Alliance strategic
objectives. CRPO are conducted in the JOA and directed at the approved
target audiences with the aim of creating a supportive environment for NATO
forces and encourage cooperation by these target audiences. The
objectives are to assist in the achievement of the mission and protect the
force.
c.
Combat psychological operations (CPO)

(1)
Definition: Planned psychological operations against approved target
audiences in support of the commander as an integral part of combat
operations and designed to defeat the adversary by reducing or eliminating
the will to continue aggression in the Joint Operations Area (JOA), as well as
to support the operational freedom of the commander.
(2)
Description: CPO are conducted at the operational and tactical levels.
They are the responsibility of the NATO commander and are planned and
executed in consonance with Alliance strategic objectives. They must be
fully co-ordinated with all other aspects of an operation. CPO are directed at
adversary military forces and civilians in the JOA with the aim of reducing the
adversarys combat power by eliminating the adversarys will to continue
aggression and support the operational freedom of the commander.
0109. CRPO and CPO will not target the international press, NATO nations, allied or
coalition forces, or civilian audiences outside the JOA. Nevertheless, the impact of
PSYOPS on these unintended audiences must be taken into account. This policy
does not preclude employment of PSYOPS units to provide support and technical
assistance to non-PSYOPS activities such as troop information or public information
(PI), which have responsibility for addressing these audiences. However, PSYOPS
will not be given responsibility for addressing those audiences.
1-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Section V - Principles of PSYOPS
0110. General. PSYOPS may be long or short term, and the principles of developing a
PSYOPS plan apply across the range of military operations. Although the
complexity of the methodology varies with the target audiences, basic
considerations for development of all PSYOPS plans are the same:
a.
Mission. The most important principle is that the PSYOPS mission must be
clearly defined in terms that correspond to the supported commanders
stated endstate.
b.
Research and evaluation. PSYOPS themes, activities and symbols should

be based upon thorough research and analysis of target audiences, and of
friendly and adversary PSYOPS capabilities. It should be taken into
consideration that NATO military areas of interest will not only include
regions of conventional conflict, but will be interspersed with possible long
periods in the pre- and post-conflict phases, civil unrest, insurgent and
terrorist activities, changes in intensity, and other asymmetric activities, etc.
Furthermore, attention must be paid to various divisions within a target
audience to prevent inadvertent strengthening of the will to resist within a
sub-set of the target audience. The impact of PSYOPS should be evaluated
continuously for relevance and effectiveness to the mission and to allied
goals, with adjustments made to PSYOPS activities when necessary.
c.
Understanding. Fundamental to the effect of PSYOPS is the ability of

PSYOPS practitioners to understand the motivations of the target audiences.
Sound analysis of all available information on the target audience(s),
including country studies, can promote understanding and is an essential
part of pre-deployment training and assessment for PSYOPS.
Understanding with the target audience will assist in selection of appropriate
themes, lines of persuasion, and media that are credible, reliable, and readily
accessible by the target audience(s).
d.
Early integration and coordination. PSYOPS activities must be fully

integrated into the operational planning process from the outset and coordinated continuously during execution to ensure that it supports the
commander's objectives.
e.
Timeliness. Rapid exploitation of PSYOPS themes is often critical, thus

quick planning, pre-testing and approval procedures must be developed to
ensure fleeting opportunities can be exploited. Product approval and release
authority should be delegated to the lowest level appropriate to allow this to
happen.
f.
Truthfulness. All missions must be based on true information. The use of

1-5
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
false information is counter-productive to the long-term credibility and
ultimate success of PSYOPS.
g.
Acknowledgment of the source. NATO PSYOPS activities acknowledge

the source, and all NATO PSYOPS products and programmes should be
ultimately attributable to NATO.
h.
Credibility. Credibility in the minds of the TA is a matter of perception. The

truthfulness of the source and the ultimate credibility of the messageare
usually related however it should be noted that although information may be
truthful, this might not give it credibility in the eyes of a target audience. The
impact of PSYOPS should be evaluated continually to ensure credibility has
not been compromised or degraded.
0111. Support requirements for PSYOPS.

a.
Intelligence and information. Intelligence support for military PSYOPS

requires extensive information on the target audiences and their identity,
location, vulnerabilities, susceptibilities, their political, economic, social or
cultural, and historic conditions. Initially, this will be provided by basic
intelligence from NATO and possibly national sources, and updated by
Current Intelligence as it becomes available. Collection should be from all
available sources and agencies, and be based upon thorough mission and
requirements planning. Additionally, intelligence should be used to aid and
determine the effectiveness of all PSYOPS activities.
b.
Command, control, communications, and computers (C4). Military C4

systems facilitate the execution of command and control (C2) and its
supporting functions. These systems are vital to planning, mounting, and
sustaining successful combined, joint PSYOPS hence C4 should be
designed that provide interoperable, rapid, reliable, and secure exchange of
information throughout the chain of command. Communication and
information systems (CIS) should allow access to classified databases,
including Intelligence databases, serve as a secure medium to pass products
and support reach-back and PSYOPS networks. It should also provide
unclassified e-mail communications and internet access.
c.
Logistics. Support of combined, joint PSYOPS places unique additional

demands on allied and theatre logistic systems. Although the majority of
PSYOPS sustainment requirements can be satisfied by standard service
support systems, PSYOPS-specific equipment are generally low-density
items which require intensive management. Operating supplies, repair parts,
and major end-items for PSYOPS-specific equipment will require theatre
logistic planners - working closely with combined, joint operation planners to bring the logistic items into theatre to ensure continuous sustainment and
1-6
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
support for the PSYOPS plan. Distribution of these assets to PSYOPS forces
may pose unique transport requirements that are dictated by the nature of
the operation, the existing transport infrastructure, and rates of consumption.
Before any PSYOPS plan is executed, all aspects of logistic supportability
must be considered and coordinated. As well, national authorities must be
consulted to confirm that authority exists for expenditures that the national
authority will be expected to fund from the national authorities appropriation.
To assist in reducing the PSYOPS logistic footprint in theatre, emphasis
should also be placed on locating and using equipment and supplies either
already available in theatre via local contract or purchase (i.e., printing
presses and radio and/or television (TV) broadcast transmitters) and/or
available in home bases through reach-back. Reach-back is the process of
obtaining mission essential C2, products, services and applications, in a
timely manner, by using CIS technology between non-deployed and forwarddeployed elements... in order to achieve operational efficiency.
Section VI - Counter PSYOPS

0112. General. The aim of counter PSYOPS is to safeguard audiences from adversary
messages or to lessen their impact. Counter PSYOPS uses assets to analyse an
adversary psychological activity and its effect on friendly populations, uncommitted
audiences, and NATO forces. Analysis of the adversary psychological activities is
conducted using subjective and/or objective methods. Themes are identified and
techniques are employed to counter the effect of their psychological activities.
Themes selected for this purpose aim to reduce the adversarys real or potential
prestige, counter the effects of adversary psychological activities and inform
audiences about the NATO forces intentions and measures. NATO PSYOPS
forces and assets may be used to provide the commander with an analysis of the
adversarys psychological activities, however they will not have the responsibility for
directly addressing NATO forces. Direction by the NATO commander and
subsequent close coordination by INFO OPS staff is required between PSYOPS, PI
staffs and troop information activities in the employment of counter PSYOPS
techniques. See annex D for counter PSYOPS analysis and techniques.
Section VII Psychological operations relationships with other military activities.

0113. Related strategies. The effectiveness of NATO PSYOPS lines of operation may
be enhanced if they support, and are supported by, other lines of operation,
particularly those in the information environment.
0114. The relationship with military INFO OPS. PSYOPS will be coordinated by INFO
OPS and are usually a key contributor of INFO OPS activity. NATO policy for the
conduct of INFO OPS is given in MC 422 and is articulated in AJP-3.10 Allied Joint
1-7
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Publication for Information Operations. INFO OPS are defined as: coordinated
and synchronized actions to create desired effects on the will, understanding and
capability of adversaries, potential adversaries and other NAC approved parties in
support of the Alliance overall objectives by affecting their information, informationbased processes and systems while exploiting and protecting one's own.
a.
INFO OPS supports the broad Alliance objectives. PSYOPS assists in the
achievement of specific objectives in support of INFO OPS. INFO OPS is the
higher-level function for all information activities1 and provides the coordination and synchronisation for such activities.
b.
Within the new construct of INFO OPS, a decision-makers effectiveness is a

function of will, understanding and capability. In other words, a decisionmaker must have the will to act, an understanding of the situation to act and
possess the capability to act. If any one of these elements is not in place,
the decision-makers ability to act in the way he wants to will be affected. In
this construct, INFO OPS produce effects on the will, understanding, and
capability of decision-makers through influence activity, countercommand activity, and information protection activity.
c.
PSYOPS influences attitudes, perceptions and behaviour and can affect a

broad range of target audiences from populations to decision-makers at all
levels. NAC-approved PSYOPS objectives, derived to support INFO OPS
activities, should support military targeting at all levels. The close
coordination of PSYOPS and other military activities provided by INFO OPS
planners at all levels should ensure that the desired effect on a target is not
compromised by any inconsistency of the commanders campaign plan.
0115. Force Protection. Force protection is defined in BI-SC Directive 80-25 as: All
measures taken and means used to minimize the vulnerability of personnel,
facilities, equipment and operations to any threat and in all situations, to preserve
the freedom of action and operational effectiveness of a force. PSYOPS can be a
key element to enhance force protection, not only by modifying the behaviour of
selected target audiences towards NATO, gaining and sustaining their willingness
to co-operate, and deterring adversaries from adversary activities but also by
employment of counter PSYOPS in support of NATO troops.
0116. Relationship with CIMIC. PSYOPS and civil-military cooperation (CIMIC) can be
mutually supporting. PSYOPS can be used to influence the attitudes and behaviour
in the operational area; CIMIC staffs work to improve conditions that, in turn, would
1
Information activities : Actions designed to create effects in the Information Domain performed by military
or non-military, governmental or non-governmental, national or multinational actors. [MNIOE White Paper
version 1.71 dated as 31 May 06]
1-8
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
affect attitudes. However, whilst CIMIC aims to achieve a stable and sustainable
end-state through effective co-ordination with civil actors, and may have an
influence effect, one of the key tenets of CIMIC is transparency and there should be
no intention to influence international organisations, non-governmental
organisations and others. Assistance provided under the auspices of CIMIC is not
tied to the acceptance of NATO forces and PSYOPS should avoid giving any
perception to the contrary. The immediate purpose of CIMIC is to establish and
maintain the full cooperation of the NATO commander and the civilian authorities,
organisations, agencies and population within a commander's area of operations in
order to allow him to fulfil his mission. This may include direct support to the
implementation of a civil plan. The long-term purpose of CIMIC is to help create and
sustain conditions that will support the achievement of Alliance objectives in
operations. In meeting this purpose CIMIC staff will:
a.
Liaison with civil actors at the appropriate level.
b.
Engage in joint planning, at the strategic as well as the operational level, with
appropriate civilian bodies before and during an operation.
c.
Carry out continuous assessments of the local civil environment, including

local needs in order to identify the extent of any vacuum and how that
vacuum might be filled.
d.
Oversee the conduct of civil-related activities by military forces, including the

provision of requisite functional specialists.
e.
Work towards a timely and smooth transition of civil responsibilities to the

proper authorities.
f.
Work with other staff branches on all aspects of operations.
g.
Advise the commander on all of the above.
h.
PSYOPS, or their assets, should be used directly to gain support of civilians

for CIMIC missions and to publicise CIMIC activities and successes.
Additionally or alternatively, PSYOPS, targeted in support of operations, may
enhance the confidence of the local population and thus facilitate CIMIC
operations. Many CIMIC operations can be effective influence operations,
and co-ordination between CIMIC and PSYOPS is important.
0117. Related processes, capabilities and functional areas

a.
Strategic processes. There are a number of related processes and areas

that the NAC, nations and strategic commanders may consider to be
appropriate to co-ordinate so as to gain maximum operational effect, or in
1-9
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
order to protect the Alliance and military capabilities. PSYOPS therefore
requires high-level political guidance, and should contribute to information
strategy development.
b.
Intelligence. Intelligence policy is given in MC 128 and articulated in

doctrine at AJP-2. PSYOPS staff will be key customers of the intelligence
process. They will be continually engaged with intelligence staffs, setting
requirements, seeking analysis of complex situations, and requesting
objective analysis on the measures of effectiveness (MOEs) of the PSYOPS
lines of operation as a part of the campaign.
c.
Operational planning. NATO Policy for the conduct of operational planning

is given in MC 133/3. The integration of PSYOPS into operational planning
from the early stage will help to contribute to the identification of centres of
gravity, decisive points, and development of courses of action, and will allow
for the allocation of appropriate resources to address these in the
subsequent planning, force generation and operational processes.
d.
Targeting and assessment. PSYOPS analysis contributes as an integral

part to operational targeting, and supports current situation assessment
(CSA), battle damage assessment/compliance assessment (BDA/CA) and
the assessment of key task accomplishment (KTA). In return, the results of
these processes will provide guidance for the PSYOPS line of operation.
0118. Public information (PI). NATOs policy for the conduct of PI is given at MC 457
and is articulated in doctrine by AJP-01(C). PI, in common with NATO PSYOPS, is
reliant upon truthfulness for its credibility. PI differs from PSYOPS in that PI
conveys its messages through public media whereas PSYOPS uses media
controlled by own forces or discreet indigenous public media specifically selected to
reach a distinct target audience. In addition, the primary aim of PSYOPS is to
influence approved target audiences, while the central goal of PI is to inform the
general public. The NAC will direct the manner in which NATO conducts PI. The
NAC and commanders at all levels should ensure that themes and messages
portrayed at all levels are coherent with each other, and that the integrity of both
direct and indirect communications on behalf of the NAC or NATO commanders
remains intact. PSYOPS messages must be closely co-ordinated with other
information activities, especially PI. However, there is always a division between
PSYOPS and PI activities.
1 - 10
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
CHAPTER 2
ORGANISATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PSYOPS
Section I - General
0201. The Military Committee (MC) is the authority for NATO PSYOPS policy. The MC
exercises its responsibility through the International Military Staff (IMS), operations
division. To assist in this responsibility, providing advice on NATO policy and
doctrine matters, the MC authorized the formation of a NATO PSYOPS working
group (PSYOPS WG), the terms of reference of which are in MC 402 annex D.
During crisis or war the Military Committee advises the NAC on PSYOPS matters,
which in turn provides the overall strategic direction for the operation, including
PSYOPS, and serves as the focal point where nations can harmonize their overall
information strategies.
Section II - Responsibilities
0202. Responsibilities of the Military Committee
a.
To approve and maintain an effective PSYOPS policy, and ensure that

PSYOPS aspects are included, where appropriate, in other MC policy
documents.
b.
To provide guidance for the conduct of PSYOPS to include operations,

exercises and training.
c.
To develop and promulgate NATO PSYOPS doctrine through the Military

Committee Joint Standardization Board (MCJSB).
d.
To encourage cooperation and co-ordination of all military PSYOPS matters

within NATO.
e.
As appropriate, to seek NAC guidance and approval for PSYOPS objectives

and target audiences.
f.
As appropriate, to provide military advice to the NAC regarding SPO support

from nations.
g.
As appropriate, to coordinate counter PSYOPS among the NATO and troop

contributing nations (TCNs) at the strategic level.
2-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
0203. Responsibilities of the strategic commanders

a.
To ensure subordinate commands have the doctrine, standing operating

procedures (SOP) and plans required to implement PSYOPS in accordance
with the emerging NATO Crisis Response System (NCRS).
b.
To develop and coordinate and update PSYOPS concepts, plans and

procedures.
c.
To include PSYOPS in operational plans.
d.
To forward to NATO political authorities requests for SPO in support of

military operations.
e.
To authorise, coordinate, and supervise the conduct of CRPO and CPO.
f.
To initiate requests for scientific research and development for the

improvement of PSYOPS techniques and means.
g.
To develop training standards and include in a realistic manner PSYOPS in

NATO training and exercises.
h.
To establish and maintain PSYOPS personnel within their own headquarters

and subordinate commands.
i.
To integrate PSYOPS into all aspects of the operation.
j.
To review and develop PSYOPS related NCRS measures and/or options for
MC approval.
k.
To develop PSYOPS force proposals, force standards and goals.
0204. Responsibilities of the operational commanders

a.
To include PSYOPS in contingency plans.
b.
To designate specific staff responsibility for PSYOPS and ensure the

responsible staff is trained.
c.
To develop training standards and to exercise PSYOPS during operational

train-up.
d.
To integrate PSYOPS into all plans and orders to support all operations.
2-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
e.
To supervise and coordinate CRPO and CPO of subordinate headquarters

(HQs).
f.
To conduct PSYOPS analysis and planning within their own area of

responsibility (AOR), and to contribute to strategic PSYOPS assessments.
g.
To accept and support national PSYOPS forces to support their operations,

when transfer of authority (TOA) is effective.
h.
To exercise approval authority, when delegated, for PSYOPS programmes

and products developed by supporting PSYOPS forces in the JOA, and
coordinate tactical PSYOPS to ensure consistency with JOA PSYOPS.
0205. Responsibilities of the nations

a.
To consider PSYOPS during the planning process and implement it into

directives and planning documents.
b.
To develop national plans and programmes to support NATO PSYOPS

policy and doctrine.
c.
To ensure that, within their capabilities and overall priorities, intelligence is

provided in support of NATO PSYOPS.
d.
To ensure that, within their capabilities and overall priorities, research and
analysis are provided in support of NATO PSYOPS.
e.
To ensure interoperability is taken into consideration during development and

procurement of PSYOPS capabilities.
f.
To provide, within means and capability, resources and trained personnel to

support NATO PSYOPS in operations and exercises. This may apply to
PSYOPS forces deployed in a JOA but also to PSYOPS forces supporting
NATO operations from home bases (reach-back).
2-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
0206. NATO PSYOPS staffing process
DISCUSS SPO AMONG NATIONS
(4)
NAC
APPROVE PSYOPS OBJECTIVES, TARGET AUDIENCES

THEMES TO AVOID & LIMITATIONS AS PART OF OPLAN
(3)
(4)
MC
INFORM, SEEK APPROVAL AND PASS TO THE NAC
SEND TO SC APPROVED PSYOPS OBJECTIVES, TARGET AUDIENCES

(2)
(5)
SC
REQUESTS FOR SPO

SEEK APPROVAL FOR CRPO / CPO
SEND TO OPERATIONAL COMMANDER

THE APPROVED PSYOPS OBJECTIVES, TARGET AUDIENCES,
(6)
(1)
DEVELOP AND APPROVE

THEMES, PROGRAMMES
(7)
CONDUCT PSYOPS ACTIVITIES,
(8)
APPROVE PRODUCTS, DISSEMINATE
JOINT FORCE
COMMANDER
CJTF/THEATRE
COMMANDER
PROPOSE PSYOPS OBJECTIVES,

TARGET AUDIENCES, THEMES TO AVOID &
PSYOPS LIMITATIONS
(9)
PROVIDE FEEDBACK
AND PROPOSE CHANGES
NATO PSYOPS STAFFING PROCESS
2-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
CHAPTER 3
COMMAND AND CONTROL OF PSYOPS

Section I - General
0301. Authority. NATO PSYOPS Policy is contained within MC 402, and it is from this
policy document that NATO PSYOPS doctrine derives its authority.
0302. National responsibilities. As stated in Chapter 2, member nations are responsible
for developing plans and programmes in support of NATO PSYOPS policy and
doctrine, and for ensuring that interoperability with other NATO nations is taken into
consideration during development and procurement of national PSYOPS
capabilities. Additionally, they ensur that, if appropriate and within national
capabilities intelligence, research, and analysis is provided in support of NATO
PSYOPS, and for provide, where possible, national resources and trained
personnel to support NATO PSYOPS in operations and exercises.
0303. Range of impact. It is highly likely that there will be a psychological impact present
from almost all actions (or indeed, inactions) undertaken by NATO. This impact is
likely to be felt not only in the immediate theatre of operations but also, due to the
sophistication of modern media communications, much further a field. It is
incumbent upon commanders at all levels, therefore, to take into account both the
actual and potential psychological effects that may arise from actions in their area of
operations (AOO). These effects will arise both within and outside their AOO.
Commanders are responsible for all PSYOPS and counter-PSYOPS activity in their
AOO, and this will inevitably require staff with PSYOPS responsibility at all levels of
their commands, especially given the need for coordination up and down the chain
of command.
Section II - Organisation of PSYOPS forces

304.
General. NATO has no standing PSYOPS forces; the only permanent
PSYOPS capability currently under NATO command is the presence of staff officers
with PSYOPS responsibilities within the peacetime organisation at SC, JFC and
JFC component levels. In time of crisis or war, NATO operational and tactical
PSYOPS forces would be constituted from national contributions. These PSYOPS
forces would be task organised for specific missions, and their composition would
be based upon mission, size of the AOO, the psychological situation, the
communications infrastructure/media environment, composition and capability of
3-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
adversary forces and indigenous populations, etc. When the circumstances require
it, and when resources permit, PSYOPS forces allocated to support a NATO
combined joint task force (CJTF) can form a combined joint force psychological
operations component command (CJFPOCC), which would be under operational
control (OPCON) of the CJTF commander. However, the normal organisation from
which PSYOPS support is provided will be a combined joint psychological
operations task force (CJPOTF) (see paragraph 306 below). Optimally, a PSYOPS
lead nation will provide the nucleus around which the CJFPOCC can be formed as
a serial on the combined joint statement of requirements (CJSOR).
0305. Combined joint force psychological operations component command
(CJFPOCC).
a.
Purpose. The primary purpose of the CJFPOCC is to provide PSYOPS

support to the CJTF commander, including AOO assessment, to control the
development, production and dissemination of all PSYOPS products on
CJTF level, and to coordinate the efforts of all PSYOPS support elements
(PSEs) of subordinate commands. While support to the CJTF is the primary
role envisioned for the CJFPOCC, this does not preclude the formation of a
CJFPOCC to support non-CJTF formations or structures.
b.
Key elements and tasks. The CJFPOCC normally consist of the following
elements:
(1)
CJFPOCC HQ Staff. Includes the command group and principal

functional staff elements J1-J6, and provides advice to the CJTF
commander, develops the PSYOPS SUPLAN to support CJTF level
operations, conducts target audience analysis and PSYOPS impact
analysis, develops plans and programmes, controls development,
production and dissemination of products, coordinates reach-back
support and contracting of local assets, liaises and coordinates with
supported (civil) agencies, and coordinates tactical PSYOPS
support.
(2)
Product development centre (PDC). Develops and produces print,

audio, audio-visual and other media products for CJTF level
dissemination to support PSYOPS objectives, and may produce
material for supported commands if requested.
(3)
Dissemination means. Capable of all weather/any conditions

sensitive product delivery to supported commands.
(4)
Liaison elements. Provides 24 hr operations awareness and

PSYOPS integration into other components or headquarters as
3-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
required. This does not preclude the necessity for integral PSYOPS
staff in other components or headquarters.
c.
Generic CJFPOCC force structure

COMCJFPOCC
OF5
DCOM
OF4
PSE
LNOs
COS
OF3/4
J1
OF2
J2
OF2/3
TAA/TES
J3
OF3/4
DISSEM
J4
OF3
BUDFIN
OF4
J5
OF3
IO/NGO
PDC
J6
OF3
OF2
Print
Other
Media
COORD
Radio
TV
TAA/TES= Target Audience Analysis/ Test & Evaluation Section
DISSEM = Theatre Dissemination
PDC = Product Development Centre
Possible CJFPOCC Force Structure
Figure 3-1. Possible CJFPOCC Force Structure.

0306. Combined joint psychological operations task force (CJPOTF)
a.
Purpose. The primary purpose of the CJPOTF is to provide PSYOPS

support to the commander. The CJPOTF structure is particularly appropriate
when it is in command and control of tactical PSYOPS formations. Like the
CJFPOCC, the CJPOTF is best formed through the CJSOR/force generation
process and is best fashioned around a nucleus contributed by a PSYOPS
lead nation. However, its capabilities may not be as robust as a CJFPOCC,
and because it may lack some of the functional staff agencies (CJ1 CJ6), it
may depend upon the supported headquarters for the necessary
administrative, logistical, and communications support.
3-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
Key elements and tasks. The CJPOTF normally is similar in composition

and function to the CJFPOCC, with the notable exception that it will typically
have limited capabilities in the CJ1, 2, 4 and 6 staff functions.
0307. PSYOPS support elements (PSEs)

a.
Purpose. The primary purpose of the PSE is to provide staff planning,

limited production capability, and give functional guidance on the tactical
level. For land operations, PSEs should be formed at the corps, division,
and brigade levels. While the composition and tasks of these PSEs will vary
depending upon the mission, operational requirement, and nations
contributing to the formation, at a minimum these elements should have the
capacity to provide PSYOPS subject matter input as part of the military
planning process, conduct an analysis of the local target audiences, and
prepare and disseminate PSYOPS products, either through organic means.
PSEs can also be formed to support elements of air, maritime and special
operations. A PSE may also be integrated into the CJTF/AOO-level
supported HQ as part of the crisis establishment (CE) when there is no
PSYOPS lead nation, or other limitations and considerations prevent the
formation of a CJFPOCC or CJPOTF. The PSE is a functional capability and
not staff reinforcement. Ideally, the PSE is built around the command and
staff of the supporting PSYOPS unit appropriate for the supported echelon.
b.
Key Tasks. Key tasks of a PSE on all levels may include:

(1)
To recommend PSYOPS task organization in support of subordinate

echelons for individual missions and overall operations.
(2)
To advise the commander on all aspects of PSYOPS support to

operations.
(3)
To integrate PSYOPS into planning and conduct of operations.
(4)
To coordinate, as far as possible, PSYOPS with CIMIC.
(5)
To liaise with supported commands/units and civil agencies.
(6)
To conduct analysis of the society or community (e.g.target

audiences, media, sociological, economical and political situation,
impact of adversary propaganda, impact analysis of PSYOPS
products).
(7)
To evaluate measure of effectiveness (MOE).
(8)
To support the operational estimate of the situation with PSYOPS

3-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
analysis results.
c.
(9)
To develop PSYOPS programmes and products (if assets available)

and/or request production support.
(10)
To support the PSYOPS approval procedure.
(11)
To coordinate product distribution and direct product dissemination.
(12)
To coordinate the activities of the PSEs and tactical PSYOPS teams

(TPTs) of subordinated units.
(13)
To give functional guidance to subordinate commands.
Key Elements of a CJTF or area of operation (AOO) HQ PSE. If a PSE is

integrated into this level of HQ, it would normally consist of the following
elements:
(1)
Chief/Commander PSE.
(2)
Operations & plans Section. This includes liaison, target audience

analysis / test and evaluation, language support, and dissemination
elements.
(3)
Product development section. This includes development and limited

production capabilities for print, audio, audio-visual and other media
products.
0308. Tactical PSYOPS teams (TPT). The primary purpose of the TPT is to enable the
tactical commander to communicate directly with target audiences within his AOR.
TPTs can work for PSEs or directly for unit commanders. When attached or
OPCON to a unit, the TPT chief acts as the PSYOPS advisor to the commander.
The TPT employs themes, lines of persuasion and scripts to fit a specific local
situation, but any modifications must remain within the guidelines provided by
higher PSYOPS headquarters and the NAC approved objectives for the operation.
In addition to loudspeaker operations, TPTs can conduct other types of PSYOPS.
They can disseminate approved printed material, conduct face-to-face
communication, gather and assess information on the target audience(s) and the
effectiveness of friendly PSYOPS and adversary psychological activities or acquire
other PSYOPS-relevant information from local sources, and contribute to the preand post-testing of PSYOPS products. While dedicated PSYOPS personnel best
perform the TPT mission, the TPT function can be undertaken by appropriately
trained, equipped, and supported personnel from other specialities.
0309. Transfer of authority (TOA) of national PSYOPS forces. Ideally, national
3-5
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
PSYOPS forces assigned to an operation should be transferred to NATO authority
through a TOA message. However, some nations consider their military PSYOPS
forces to be national forces whose operations are politically sensitive. Therefore,
they may not agree to a TOA for these forces in some circumstances, or they may
agree to a TOA but will restrict the use of their PSYOPS forces in some missions;
these restrictions will be set out in the TOA message as national caveats. Under
exceptional circumstances nations may agree to provide PSYOPS support, without
TOA, to a CJTF/AOO commanders operation when the nation agrees with the
PSYOPS objectives and themes to be used. Regardless of the status of PSYOPS
forces, transparency coordination of their efforts within the supported HQ remains
imperative.
0310. PSYOPS lead nation. In any planned or proposed operation in which PSYOPS
is part of the statement of requirements (SOR) of the CJTF/AOO force, the SC
should request one nation to act as the lead nation for the CJFPOCC or CJPOTF.
The PSYOPS lead nation takes on the responsibility for providing the bulk of the
PSYOPS personnel for the CJTF/AOO force (with any agreements for other nations
to contribute to the PSYOPS element at this level being responsible as the lead
nation), providing the PSYOPS communications, product development, production
and dissemination assets, as well as responsibility for procuring and providing the
necessary PSYOPS logistical support. Compensation and/or reimbursement will be
subject to agreements between the parties involved. As with all NATO operations,
nations participating in the operation are responsible for providing PSYOPS support
to their manoeuvre units, and co-ordinating all their PSYOPS activity with the
CJFPOCC and CJPOTF.
0311. PSYOPS framework nation. In any planned or proposed operation in which
PSYOPS is part of the CE of the CJTF/AOO force headquarters, the SC should
request one nation to become the framework nation for PSYOPS. In this context,
the term framework nation is used to describe a nation that takes on responsibility
for providing the commander and core staff of the CJFPOCC, CJPOTF, or PSE.
However, because the PSYOPS activity is part of the CJTF/AOO force HQ CE,
funding for PSYOPS equipment, product production, dissemination, and logistical
support is a NATO responsibility. Staff procedures, although based on alliance
standards, will reflect those of the framework nation. In practice, however, once
command and staff teams work together, procedures may incorporate the best
ideas of all the contributing nations. Nations participating in the operation are
responsible for providing PSYOPS support to their manoeuvre units, and they will
be asked to provide augmentees and/or PSYOPS capability (e.g. production
support) to the CJFPOCC, CJPOTF, or PSE and to coordinate all their PSYOPS
activity with the CJFPOCC, CJPOTF, or PSE.
0312. PSYOPS activities when no framework or lead nation is identified.
Experience has shown that many times NATO will be unable to fulfil a request for a
nation to assume responsibilities as the framework or lead nation for PSYOPS.
3-6
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
This may be particularly true in circumstances where the mission is anticipated to
be of long duration (more than six months). Therefore, the SC may ask many
nations to contribute to a PSYOPS PSE CE, as part of the CJTF/AOO force HQ CE,
without one nation clearly identified as the Framework or Lead Nation. PSYOPS
CE positions, along with the other CJTF/AOO force HQ requirements, will be
discussed with possible TCNs during the manning conference held by the SC. In
these cases, funding for PSYOPS equipment, product production, dissemination,
communications, and logistical support is a NATO responsibility.
Options for PSYOPS

Organisation
options
Requirement
options
Filling requirements
Lead
Lead
Nation
Nation
CJFPOCC
CJFPOCC
SOR
SOR
Framework
Framework
Nation
Nation
CJPOTF
CJPOTF
CE
CE
CJTF
CJTF PSE
PSE
No
No Lead
Lead or
or
Framework
Framework
Preferred path
Possible alternative path
Figure 3-2. Manning options for PSYOPS

0313. Force generation. Force generation is a process that parallels the operational
planning process (OPP) and is accomplished through a series of warning and
activation messages. If listed on the SOR, during the force generation process,
PSYOPS forces for a particular operation are identified and nations are invited to
contribute forces and capabilities.
a.
NAC force activation directive. The first step in the force generation
process is the issue by the NAC of the force activation directive, which
directs the SC to initiate force activation. The earliest point at which the NAC
can issue the force activation directive is coincident with approval of the SC
Concept of Operations (CONOPS). As far as PSYOPS forces are concerned,
the PSYOPS planners in appropriate NATO commands should have roughly
identified the capabilities required to execute the CONOPS as soon as
possible.
3-7
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
SC activation warning (ACTWARN). Upon receipt of the force activation

directive, the SC commences the formal force generation process by means
of an ACTWARN message to nations, together with an Initial SOR, derived
from a troops-to-task analysis. Usually the SOR for PSYOPS is geared
towards outlining the requirements for the CJFPOCC or CJPOTF, as the
provision of tactical-level PSEs and TPTs to support manoeuvre units is a
national responsibility. Invariably, the SC PSYOPS staff will already have
informally contacted potential PSYOPS TCNs to get a feel as to what nations
might be willing to provide. At this point the PSYOPS planners from the SC
and from the CJTF or AOO commander must ensure that requirements for
PSYOPS forces are included in the SOR. The ACTWARN informs NATO
Joint Force Commander (JFC) and nations that a force is required; it outlines
the mission and identifies key dates (e.g. Force Generation Conference).
Concurrent release of the initial SOR, with the ACTWARN, provides nations
a clear view of the SC intentions.
c.
SC force generation and manning conferences. Upon receipt of nations'

informal force offers in response to the Initial SOR, the SC calls a force
generation conference, normally chaired by the Deputy SC, with all potential
troop contributing nations (TCNs) and appropriate NATO commands in
attendance. It is important that PSYOPS planners from the SC, from the
CJTF/AOO commander and from potential PSYOPS force contributing
nations attend this meeting. Every line entry in the initial SOR is addressed,
with the aim of providing as much of the required force as possible. Ideally,
at this stage a lead nation for the CJFPOCC or CJPOTF can be identified.
Upon completion of the force generation conference, the SC forwards a draft
SOR, which reflects nations force offers and details the proposed force
package for the operation, to the NAC, through the MC, for approval. Again,
usually the SOR is geared towards the requirements only for the CJFPOCC
or CJPOTF, the provision of tactical PSEs and TPTs being a national
responsibility. The SC PSYOPS planner should ensure that all appropriate
PSYOPS forces required by the CJFPOCC or CJPOTF are included in this
draft SOR. The NAC approval of the draft SOR constitutes approval for the
next step in the force activation process. The SC will also hold a concurrent
or separate manning conference where the CE for the CJTF/AOO HQ is
briefed to nations and where nations can offer personnel to fill the CE
positions. If PSYOPS is part of the HQ CE, it is during the SC-sponsored
manning conference where the PSYOPS requirements are met by
contributing nations.
d.
SC activation request (ACTREQ). Upon NAC approval of the draft SOR,

the SC issues the ACTREQ message to nations. The ACTREQ requests
nations to formally commit to the force package in the draft SOR. It must
state clearly when nations are expected to respond to the ACTREQ by
sending their national force preparation (FORCEPREP) message to the SC.
3-8
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
e.
Nations' force preparation (FORCEPREP) messages. Upon receipt of the

ACTREQ, nations provide the SC with a FORCEPREP message, which is
the formal commitment of national contributions to the draft SOR force
package.
f.
SC force balancing conference. If necessary, following receipt of all

FORCEPREP messages, the SC conducts a force balancing conference to
address any shortfalls in the desired force package. Often, PSYOPS forces
will be considered in a separate conference chaired by the SCs PSYOPS
staff.
g.
NAC execution directive. Once the operation plan (OPLAN) is endorsed by

MC and approved by the NAC, and the final SOR has been issued, the NAC
can issue its execution directive to initiate mission execution.
h.
SC activation order (ACTORD). Upon receipt of the NACs execution

Directive, the SC issues an ACTORD message to all participating nations,
which initiates release of national forces and TOA to the SC, as well as
authorising the deployment of NATO forces.
0314. Sustainability. To reduce to a minimum the requirement to provide military

PSYOPS forces, which remain a scarce commodity, PSYOPS planners should
consider reach-back (with PSYOPS elements left back in home stations) in
providing PSYOPS in the CJTF/AOO (i.e. research and analysis, product
development and production, etc.). In addition, reach-back may be necessitated
by operational security considerations This may require additional logistic support
and/or increases in requirements for supporting telecommunications architecture,
especially electronic bandwidth. Additionally, the CJFPOCC, CJPOTF, or PSE,
together with the JFC and SC PSYOPS planning staffs, should regularly review the
SOR/CE with the aim of maintaining the necessary capabilities required in various
phases of an operation. This may result in the need for subsequent force
generation and force balancing conferences chaired by the SC.
Section III Command relationships

0315. To facilitate control of PSYOPS, the CJFPOCC, or CJPOTF, should be under direct
OPCON of the CJTF/AOO commander. In the case of a CJTF/AOO-level PSE, its
relationship with the rest of the HQ varies and is determined by the supported
commander, but should be in as a direct a line as possible with him. Tactical PSEs
and TPTs operate under the OPCON of their supported element, but should
coordinate their efforts under the guidance of the CJFPOCC/CJPOTF/PSE. To
facilitate this activity, there may be an exchange of liaison personnel to ensure
close communication and coordination. In terms of guidance and support, the
3-9
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
CJTF/AOO-level PSYOPS element should provide the broad left and right limits
and help orchestrate PSYOPS activities at all levels in the CJTF/AOO in order to
ensure a unity of purpose and a coherent voice for NATO military activities within
the AOO. This guidance should come in the form of a PSYOPS supporting plan
outlining PSYOPS objectives, themes, target audiences, limitations, etc., within the
context of various phases of the operation. The CJTF/AOO-level PSYOPS element
should also provide to the tactical-level PSEs PSYOPS products created for AOOwide dissemination or may provide local PSYOPS production support within means
and capabilities. Other assistance the CJTF/AOO-level PSYOPS element can
provide may be in the form of target audience analysis, insight into activities of other
tactical PSEs, etc. Tactical PSEs remain a national responsibility and must be
prepared to conduct local target audience analysis, PSYOPS planning, and limited
PSYOPS product development, production and dissemination.
3 - 10
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
CHAPTER 4
PSYOPS AND THE RANGE OF MILITARY OPERATIONS
Section I General
0401. Combined, joint military PSYOPS objectives across the range of military
operations. PSYOPS supports combined, joint conventional and special
operations and other designated NATO agencies. The role of PSYOPS varies
depending on the level of operational activity or environment, albeit any PSYOPS
activity conducted by NATO is restricted to crisis response psychological operations
(CPRO) and combat psychological operations (CPO) only, although the NAC will
seek to coordinate strategic psychological operations (SPO) conducted by nations,
and must not target friendly nations or forces, or civilian audiences outside the
AOO. Although the following discussion of the applicability of PSYOPS to the range
of military operations (crisis response operations and Article 5) describes each in
discrete terms, in actual circumstance there may not be a precise boundary where a
particular state ends and another begins.
Section II PSYOPS in support of operations

0402. Crisis response operations (CRO) (non-Article 5)
a.
Purpose. CROs span therange of military operations, from purely

humanitarian assistance to the use of force. Regardless of the mission
PSYOPS provide a critical supporting capability that a commander can use
to help achieve his objectives. PSYOPS activities can create a supportive
atmosphere and a willingness to cooperate by influencing target audience
behaviour in support of mission goals. In these types of operations PSYOPS
is a key element that serves to prevent/avoid the use or threat of force. As in
all operations, but especially so in CROs, PSYOPS is the primary tool for the
commander to communicate to target audiences. In addition it has the ability
to rapidly transition to CPO should the need arise.
b.
Objectives. Due to the broad range of CROs, the PSYOPS objectives must
be tailored to the mission. These objectives can include the following:
(1)
Gain acceptance of NATO policies, aims, and objectives.
4-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(2)
Positively modify the behaviour of selected target audiences towards

NATO.
(3)
Gain and sustain popular belief in and support for NATO objectives
within the defined area of operations.
(4)
Deter adversary powers or groups from initiating actions detrimental to

the interests of the NATO, its allies, or the conduct of friendly military
operations.
(5)
Promote cessation of hostilities by highlighting the negative effects of

violence and the positive effects of peace.
(6)
Undermine the legitimacy and credibility of the adversary, if

appropriate.
(7)
Shift the loyalty of adversary forces and their supporters.
(8)
Without compromising their integrity and impartiality, enhance the

efforts of IOs, NGOs, and other organisations that support NATO
objectives in coordination with the CIMIC staff.
(9)
Promote the benefits of NATO.
0403. Article 5 operations (A5O)

a.
Purpose. PSYOPS in support of A5O help the NATO commander establish

the conditions that can lead to decisive operations. PSYOPS can achieve
short-term goals in support of tactical actions. Properly planned and
executed PSYOPS, in coordination with lethal capabilities, can reduce the
length and severity of any confrontation and, therefore, reduce casualties on
both sides.
b.
Objectives. During A5O, the broad objectives of PSYOPS can be:

(1)
Gain acceptance of NATO policies, aims, and objectives.
(2)
Undermine public support for adversary military operations.
(3)
Influence adversary decision-makers.
(4)
Undermine confidence in the adversary leadership.
(5)
Lower the morale and combat efficiency of adversary combatants.
4-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(6)
Increase the psychological impact of NATO combat power.
(7)
Contribute to the effectiveness of military deception and operations

security.
(8)
Reduce the effectiveness of adversary propaganda against NATO.
0404. PSYOPS in support of special operations. Special operations are typically highly
compartmentalised, with a great and necessary emphasis on security. PSYOPS
can be used to shape the battlespace prior to the conduct of special operations.
When special operations are planned, PSYOPS should also be considered to
address expected consequences and mitigate potential negative effects.
Sometimes a special operations mission can be used to lay the ground work of a
PSYOP effort supporting either CRO and/or A5O efforts.
4-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
4-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
ANNEX A
PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS PLANNING
A101. General. Planning for PSYOPS in NATO operations should be developed and
executed in accordance with NATO's operational planning process (OPP). This
annex outlines how the PSYOPS planner should integrate his efforts into the OPP
mainly at the SC or JFC level, although it has some applicability at lower levels
such as the CJTF/ CC-/corps -level; it applies equally to the processes of deliberate
and crisis action planning.
A102. Scope. As covered in chapter 1, PSYOPS is an integral component of military
operation and is integrated with the decision making apparatus and combined
political-military operations of the Alliance. Accordingly, military PSYOPS may
affect not only military targets but also political, economic, or social structures within
the target area. It is vitally important, therefore, for the PSYOPS planner to get
involved at the earliest stage of planning for the operation. Planners must start
analysis and planning at the earliest moment, stay actively involved during the
whole planning process, and provide continuous assessment throughout the
planning phases.
A103. General tasks. General tasks for the PSYOPS planner are:
a.
To conduct a PSYOPS assessment and contribute to the overall planning

process.
b.
To initiate and conduct a PSYOPS estimate.
c.
To conduct mission analysis, including input to commanders critical

information requirements (CCIRs).
d.
To contribute to the development of courses of action (COAs).
e.
To contribute to the overall CONOPS.
f.
To develop applicable contributions to the operational plan (e.g. Annex L and

contributions to the main body).
g.
To identify capability/force requirements.
h.
To draft planning guidance to the supporting PSYOPS commander.

A-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
i.
To review PSYOPS plans.
A104. Planning skills. To employ PSYOPS effectively, combined/joint military PSYOPS

planners should have the following:
a.
A thorough knowledge of PSYOPS related NATO policy and objectives.
b.
Combined/joint operational planning skills with knowledge of PSYOPS

doctrine, tactics, techniques, procedures, force structure and capabilities.
c.
Access to information regarding the customs, ethics, values, and goals of the
target audience.
A105. Objectives, target audiences, themes to avoid, and limitations. NATO

operational and tactical PSYOPS plans and programmes must be based upon
guidance from the SC and specifically follow the PSYOPS objectives approved by
the NAC. PSYOPS objectives, target audiences, themes to avoid, and limitations
are developed by the operational level planning (JFC) headquarters and passed to
the SC for approval. The SC PSYOPS staff will review, approve and incorporate
the objectives, target audiences, themes to avoid, and limitations in the strategic
level plan and then forward them to the NAC for approval as part of the SC OPLAN.
Other portions of the PSYOPS planning process, including analysis of target
audiences, development of themes to stress, etc., continue at the JFC level.
A106. Force planning. Force planning will be initiated by SC CONOPS, in which the
mission has been stated and the size of the force determined, so that the specific
PSYOPS functions and capabilities required can be ascertained. The required
functions and capabilities will dictate the detailed composition of the PSYOPS force
as well as its priority and position in the deployment plan. PSYOPS staff must
ensure that PSYOPS force requirements are included in all plans.
A107. Advice. Any military activity can have great psychological significance. Therefore,
it is necessary for PSYOPS to advise the commander on perception issues. This is
one of the most important functions fulfilled by PSYOPS. Since psychological
activities and psychological actions go well beyond the range of just creating
products, and can involve actions by almost every part of the combined joint force,
PSYOPS advice to the commander can be crucial. advice should be provided to
the commander on the impact on target audiences of issues such as the movement
and disposition of forces or seemingly simple issues such as the uniform items worn
by the troops.
A108. Flexibility. The PSYOPS planning process should not be regarded as a
mathematical formula that, if followed rigidly, will automatically produce the correct
answers. Instead, the following process should be regarded as a template, which
must be used in conjunction with the skill and imagination of the PSYOPS planner.
A-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Furthermore, whilst the process is portrayed as a continuous progression, in reality
all stages are subject to re-assessment as new intelligence is received.
Section II - PSYOPS in the NATO operational planning process

A109. Political/Military interface. NATOs decision-making cycle depends on a close
interaction between political and military factors. Clearly, limitations and
imperatives in one area will affect decisions in the other. It is of critical importance
that PSYOPS on strategic level is represented in NATOs information strategy
working group for NATO operations (ISWGNO) and SCs operational planning
working group (OPWG). On operational level (JFC/JC/CJTF) PSYOPS should be
represented in joint operational planning groups.
A110. Integration. PSYOPS are an integral part of strategic, operational and tactical level
operations. PSYOPS themes will be perceived as expressions of NATO and
nations policies. Any inconsistency between themes used by different agencies or
at different levels may discredit the operation and damage the Allied cause. To
prevent this, careful coordination of PSYOPS is paramount. INFO OPS will
coordinate PSYOPS with other activities, and will also coordinate with PI and
CIMIC. It should be remembered that the presence of mass media in a theatre of
operations means an overlap of information between audiences is almost inevitable.
This overlap makes message de-confliction crucial. Care must also be taken to
anticipate and minimise any negative impact of PSYOPS actions or messages on
unintended audiences, including members of NATO-led forces. PSYOPS planners
should fully integrate their plans with all other staff branches and continue to coordinate throughout the conduct of the operation.
A111. PSYOPS integration with INFO OPS
a.
General
(1)
INFO OPS exploit the opportunities and vulnerabilities inherent in

information-dependant military activities. In crisis and hostilities, INFO
OPS can be used as a crisis response measure to communicate
Alliance interest and demonstrate resolve. In conflict, INFO OPS can
be applied to achieve physical and psychological results in support of
military objectives. INFO OPS contribute by taking advantage and
wider ranging influence objectives in the political, social and economic
realms of information technology, exploiting the growing worldwide
dependence upon automated information systems and near real time
global dissemination of information, to affect adversary decisionmaking with the goal of achieving informational advantage.
A-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(2)
INFO OPS contribute by both defending military decision-making from

adversary attacks and degrading an adversarys decision-making
capability, thereby producing a relative information advantage. INFO
OPS also contribute by shaping adversary perceptions and behaviour.
b.
Capabilities, tools and techniques used in support of INFO OPS.

Capabilities, tools and techniques in support of INFO OPS are employed to
influence, counter-command and protect own information and information
systems while protecting friendly information and decision-making. PSYOPS
can only be associated with the influence activity albeit this can have an
influence on the other two domains of INFO OPS (counter command and
information protection). Electronic warfare (EW) and computer network
operations (CNO) are concerned with affecting or defending the
electromagnetic spectrum, information systems, and information that support
decision makers, weapon systems, command and control (C2) and
automated responses; these are largely concerned with counter-command
activity. OPSEC, virtual, and physical protection of systems clearly are
focused in the information protection arena. Integration of all of these core
capabilities is critical to mission accomplishment.
c.
PSYOPS role in the INFO OPS coordination board

(1)
The forum for the implementation of INFO OPS is the Information

Operations Coordination Board (IOCB). This board is usually chaired
by chief INFO OPS, meets as a subset of the joint coordination board
(JCB). It will convene as necessary in the HQ decision cycle and as
required during peacetime day to day operations. Representatives on
the IOCB must have the authority to speak for and make decisions on
behalf of their command functional area. PSYOPS as a core member
of the IOCB advises on PSYOPS support of proposed INFO OPS
activity and coordinates activities with INFO OPS during the
operational planning process (OPP). PSYOPS also initiates PSYOPS
plans and the subsequent targeting process and contributes to the
development of INFO OPS activity. PSYOPS can:
(a)
Provide target audience analysis.
(b)
Be used to attack adversary legitimacy and credibility.
(c)
Build and sustain support among approved target audiences

(TAs).
(d)
Shift loyalty of adversary forces.
(e)
Help promote the cessation of hostilities.

A-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(2)
d.
(f)
Undermine adversary confidence.
(g)
Persuade isolated and bypassed adversary forces to surrender.
PSYOPS are an integrated part of INFO OPS through effective

analysis of adversary propaganda and information efforts to:
(a)
Counter and diminish adversary propaganda efforts.
(b)
Discourage adversary offensive operations.
(c)
Reduce or neutralize support of adversary operations.
(d)
Reorient or educate the selected TAs in the AOO.
(e)
Support command information programs.
Psychological operations and the information operations Cell

(1)
PSYOPS is one of the most critical capabilities of INFO OPS. They

are conducted to influence approved TAs. PSYOPS are also an
important contributor when conducting joint operations in a more
combined approach involving the influence of approved TAs.
(2)
The coordination of INFO OPS elements is critical to successful

execution of INFO OPS.
(3)
The JFCs staff, which includes the IOCB, develops and promulgates
guidance/plans for INFO OPS that are passed to the components and
supporting organizations and agencies for detailed mission planning
and decentralized execution. The IOCB integrates the broad range of
potential INFO OPS actions and activities that help contribute to the
JFCs desired end state in an operational area.
(4)
The IOCB is comprised of representatives from each staff element,

component, and supporting agency responsible for integrating INFO
OPS capabilities and related activities.
(a)
PSYOPS representatives to the INFO OPS cell are integral

members of the cell.
(b)
The duties PSYOPS representatives perform in the IOCB are in

addition to the ones they perform, for example, those they
perform in a CJFPOCC/CJPOTF/PSE.
A-5
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(c)
e.
In the IOCB, PSYOPS representatives integrate, coordinate,

deconflict, and synchronize the use of PSYOPS with INFO
OPS capabilities and related activities. They also advise and/or
recommend on other multinational information activities within a
JFCs AOO that may support INFO OPS.
Information operations support to a CJFPOCC/CJPOTF/PSE

(1)
The IOCB supports the JFCs PSYOPS element by performing the

following tasks:
(a)
The IOCB supports improved PSYOPS product development

by obtaining critical intelligence and analysis not usually
available for PSYOPS use upon request. It also can augment
dissemination of PSYOPS products and programs via nonstandard dissemination assets or platforms, and provide
responsive access and use of sensitive information and
programs for PSYOPS forces as required.
(b)
The IOCB facilitates PSYOPS communications, distribution,

and dissemination through joint restricted frequency list
deconfliction, frequency spectrum analysis, media analysis,
propagation analysis, and modeling, and helps in the facilitation
of PSYOPS contingency planning by coordinating resources to
support the PSYOPS scheme of maneuver. Additionally, it
facilitates the PSYOPS product approval process as part of an
INFO OPS program and approved TA polling, post-test
analysis, and impact assessment of PSYOPS programs, and
establishes systems for adversary propaganda collection,
reporting, and analysis to facilitate counter-PSYOPS programs.
(c)
The IOCB coordinates and synchronizes PSYOPS with INFO

OPS capabilities and related activities and other aspects of
joint force operations and assists in the collection and analysis
of impact indicators and MOE of PSYOPS plans and programs.
Furthermore, it assists in coordination and synchronization with
higher-level information operations, programs, or activities.
(d)
The IOCB ensures the coordination of PSYOPS with other

capabilities, tools and techniques. The IOCB also ensures the
joint targeting coordination board (JTCB) supports the JFC
PSYOPS objectives. The IOCB makes sure that the JTCB has
the support of PSYOPS subject matter experts.
A-6
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(2)
If military potential is to be maximized, PSYOPS and INFO OPS

cannot be conducted in a vacuum; rather, they must be woven into the
strategies and operations across the range of military operations to
include integrating them with joint, multinational, and interagency
operations.
A-7
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Relationship of PSYOPS planning to the operational planning process (OPP). The

PSYOPS planning process is designed to work in parallel with the 5 stages of the
OPP: initiation, orientation, concept development, plan development and plan
review.
STAGES
OPP
PSYOPS PLANNING
Review initiating directive
Assessment
INITIATION
from JOPG
DEVELOPMENT
2
ORIENTATION
Mission analysis
CDR's planning guidance
Mission analysis
initiate PSYOPS estimate
Develop COAs
Refine PSYOPS Estimate
Decision brief
Develop CONOPS
PSYOPS input into main

CONOPS
3
CONCEPT
DEVELOPMENT
4
PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
Develop and coordinate
Force Requirements
Plan
Family of plans
PSYOPS annex L / SUPLAN

PSYOPS input into main body
of OPLAN
Plan Review
/ evaluation
updated plan
Impact analysis
updated annex L /
SUPLAN
5
PLAN
REVIEW
Figure A1: Relationship of PSYOPS Planning to the OPP

A113. OPP Stage 1: Initiation
a.
PSYOPS have no direct input into the initiation stage, but the groundwork for
mission analysis is to be done as early as possible to direct the staffs
attention towards psychological considerations that may be important for
further planning and force generation. A key issue is the development of
detailed requests for information (RFI) to support further PSYOPS analysis.
b.
Within the AOO assessment, background research on the area of future

operations and possible target audiences will be assembled, and extant
PSYOPS studies reviewed and updated. There will frequently be a lack of
A-8
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
such prepared studies. Therefore, the PSYOPS planner must identify initial
assumptions, information shortfalls, and submit RFIs to the J2 and
appropriate agencies. Additionally, the PSYOPS planner should consider
other sources such as the Internet, the support of polling by civilian
companies in the AOO, work by academic and special interest groups, etc.
c.
It is at this point that the PSYOPS staff planners may want to request a
PSYOPS core planning team consisting of intelligence, operations and
logistics planners.
A114. OPP Stage 2: Orientation

a.
In the orientation stage PSYOPS will contribute to mission analysis and

initiate the PSYOPS estimate. The topics from the estimate will feed the
mission analysis brief, which will lead to the commanders planning
guidance. PSYOPS staff planners will contribute to the identification of
centres of gravity and decisive points.
b.
At this stage, the estimate (see Section III) summarises the considerations
and contributions of the PSYOPS Staff to mission analysis and supports
more detailed PSYOPS planning on force level, providing planning guidance
for the supporting PSYOPS commander. The estimate is prepared by the HQ
PSYOPS Staff, supported by PSYOPS experts of the
CJFPOCC/CJPOTF/PSE, and will be refined during the concept
development stage. It should be as thorough and detailed as time will
permit. The format serves as a mental checklist to ensure that all elements of
the PSYOPS situation are considered.
A115. OPP Stage 3: Concept development

a.
In the concept development stage PSYOPS provide staff analysis for

incorporation into the COAs. The process used here is to continue to refine
the PSYOPS estimate, which includes the comparison of different COAs
from the psychological perspective, the identification how PSYOPS can
support each of the operational COAs, and recommending which COA that is
best from the PSYOPS point of view.
b.
The key aim of this stage is to ensure that the commander understands the
PSYOPS considerations associated with each proposed COA in the decision
brief. The final approved operational CONOPS will dictate which line of
operations for PSYOPS to develop and which capabilities/forces are
required.
c.
During this stage, PSYOPS contributes to the main CONOPS, outlining the
significance and priority of PSYOPS activities in aiding the supported
A-9
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
commanders mission and objectives. This assists in the development of the
PSYOPS annex L.
A116. OPP Stage 4: Plan development
a.
In the plan development stage the PSYOPS annex to the plan is produced
by the HQ PSYOPS staff. A key item is to seek approval for PSYOPS
objectives from the NAC. The annex provides the basics necessary for the
development of the PSYOPS supporting plan (SUPLAN). Annex L must
include at least PSYOPS objectives, target audiences, themes to avoid,
limitations, allocate PSYOPS tasks on the operational and tactical levels, and
nominate the responsible approval authorities. A format for the PSYOPS
annex L is given in section III. The format should also be used to prepare
respective annexes to plans of subordinate HQs. Details may vary as
required on different levels of command.
b.
The information and guidance contained in the Annex L will be transformed

into a more detailed PSYOPS SUPLAN by the supporting PSYOPS
commander in close coordination with the HQ PSYOPS staff. It describes the
overall sequencing and execution of the various PSYOPS programmes, each
designed to achieve a measured response in specific target audiences, and
formulates requirements for the measurement of success. The SUPLAN is
integrated with the OPLAN to achieve PSYOPS objectives that contribute to
the accomplishment of the operational objectives of the supported
commander who approves the SUPLAN. A format for the PSYOPS SUPLAN
is given in section III.
c.
PSYOPS should contribute to the main body of the OPLAN, outlining the
significance and priority of PSYOPS activities in aiding the supported
commanders mission and objectives (ideally included in either the concept
of operations or commanders intent paragraphs). A PSYOPS contribution to
the main body will ensure a wider readership and understanding of the
PSYOPS activities.
A117. OPP stage 5: Plan review. During this stage, PSYOPS planner continues to
conduct an AOO assessment, including target audience analysis and impact
analysis. The PSYOPS SUPLAN should incorporate specific MOEs for the
PSYOPS products and actions. These should be monitored and the results used to
derive necessary amendments to the plan or make adjustments to PSYOPS
programmes. This helps to ensure the objectives to be supported are still focused
upon and aids in the assessment of the progress of the PSYOPS effort. Results
from PSYOPS analysis may also supplement intelligence collection and contribute
to the operational plan review.
A - 10
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
A118. Summary: PSYOPS planning process and outputs. Each planning stage
involves a process, has an output and contributes to a purpose as follows:
STAGE
1
PROCESS
Initiation
2
3
OUTPUTS
Updated
PSYOPS studies
PURPOSE
AOO assessment, to do the
groundwork for mission analysis.
Orientation
Submit RFIs
Initiate the PSYOPS
estimate
Fill information shortfalls

Mission analysis, to focus own
and subordinate HQ planning.
Concept
development
Continue to refine
PSYOPS estimate
Staff analysis, to ensure the

PSYOPS factors of each COA are
understood by the commander.
PSYOPS input into

main CONOPS
PSYOPS Annex L
Outlines the significance and

priority of PSYOPS activities.
To insure that objectives are
approved by the NAC.
PSYOPS input into

main body of OPLAN
Highlights PSYOPS activities to a

broader readership.
PSYOPS SUPLAN
To outline a co-ordinated
PSYOPS plan that supports the
commanders objectives.
To adjust the plan as a result of
monitoring MOEs.
Plan
development
Plan review
Updated annex L /
SUPLAN
Figure A2: PSYOPS planning process and outputs
Section III - Formats for PSYOPS planning outputs

A119. A Format for a PSYOPS estimate. The recommended format for the PSYOPS
estimate is as follows:
1.
MISSION
a.
Supported commander's mission & planning guidance

(1)
Mission
A - 11
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(2)
(3)
2.
Initial intent
End state and criteria for success
b.
PSYOPS mission
c.
Initial PSYOPS objectives (PO)
d.
Planning limitations (restraints - what must not occur and constraints - what
must occur)
SITUATION AND CONSIDERATIONS

a.
Political situation
b.
Areas of conflict / International disputes
c.
Adversary overall military key factors that impact on PSYOPS

(1)
(2)
d.
Non-belligerent third parties

(1)
(2)
e.
Uncommitted countries or groups

International / Non-governmental organisations (IO/NGO)
Allies and friendly parties

(1)
(2)
f.
Strengths & dispositions

Capabilities
(a)
General
(b)
PSYOPS-specific capabilities
(c)
Adversary propaganda and psychological activies
Strengths and dispositions

Capabilities
(a)
General
(b)
PSYOPS-specific capabilities
Media situation
(1)
(2)
International media
Local media
g.
Assumptions
h.
PSYOPS situation
A - 12
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
i.
(1)
Psychological situation
(a)
General: Historical, political, language, culture, religion,
ethnicity2
(b)
Possible target audiences (TAs)
i.
Ultimate TA
ii.
Intermediate TA
iii.
Unintended TA
iv.
Apparent TA
(c)
Conditions
(d)
Vulnerabilities
(e)
Assessment (susceptibility)
(f)
Assumed Psychological impact of operations
(2)
Communications encironment
(a)
Communications infrastructure
(b)
Media usage
(c)
Assessment (receptivity)
(3)
PSYOPS organisation
(a)
PSYOPS forces available for planning
(b)
Initial PSYOPS force requirements
Additional operational limitations or environmental factors derived by

PSYOPS analysis that will affect activities.
(The subsequent portions of the Estimate occur in OPP Stage 3)
3.
ANALYSIS OF OWN COAs
4.
5.
a.
Impacts on the PSYOPS situation
b.
Advantages and disadvantages for conducting PSYOPS
COMPARISON OF OWN COAs

a.
Advantages and disadvantages
b.
Methods of overcoming disadvantages
CONCLUSIONS
a.
Comparison of all COAs from the psychological perspective,
See Glossary for detailed definition of Psychological situation
A - 13
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
Identification of how PSYOPS can support each of the operational

COAs
c.
Recommendation on which COA is best from the PSYOPS

perspective
PSYOPS PLANNING GUIDANCE (if required)

A120. The PSYOPS annex L. A format for a PSYOPS Annex to plans is as follows:
REFERENCES:
TASK ORGANISATION:
1.
SITUATION
a.
General
b.
Specific
c.
Assumptions
(1)
(2)
Political
Military
2.
PSYOPS MISSION
3.
EXECUTION
a.
Desired PSYOPS end state (in support of the overall mission)
b.
PSYOPS concept of operations

(1)
(2)
c.
Outline
Phasing
Tasks
(1)
PSYOPS units / forces assigned

(a)
(b)
(2)
CJTF/AOO-Level (CJFPOCC, CJPOTF, or PSE)

Tactical level (PSE)
PSYOPS staff & liaison elements
A - 14
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
d.
Coordination instructions
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
e.
Approval authority
(1)
(2)
4.
5.
Intelligence
Indigenous assets
Internal and external liaison
Reach-back
Operational level PSYOPS

Tactical level PSYOPS
SERVICE SUPPORT
a.
Stocking & delivery
b.
PSYOPS-specific assets, supply & maintenance
c.
Controlling & maintaining indigenous assets
d.
Budget Coordination
e.
Personnel matters (including indigenous personnel).
COMMAND AND SIGNAL

a.
Command
(1)
(2)
b.
Command relationships of PSYOPS forces

PSYOPS internal command
Signal
(1)
(2)
(3)
PSYOPS broadcast requirements

PSYOPS C4 systems and requirements
PSYOPS reporting
APPENDICES:
1PSYOPS objectives, target audiences, limitations, and themes to avoid
2Approval process (schematic and coordination agencies)
3Others as required
A121. The PSYOPS supporting plan (PSYOPS SUPLAN).
REFERENCES:
A - 15
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
TASK ORGANISATION:
1.
SITUATION
a.
General
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
b.
Background
Strategic conditions
Desired end state (higher commanders)
(a)
Political
(b)
Military
(c)
Psychological
Objectives (Higher Commanders)
(a)
Military
(b)
Psychological
Planning Limitations
(a)
Constraints
i.
Military
ii.
Target audiences
iii.
Themes (if applicable)
iv.
Others (IAW strategic OPLAN)
(b)
Restraints (self imposed limitations, if applicable)
Opposing forces. (Overview threat assessment, including media,

communication and information conditions, propaganda potential, etc.)
(1)
(2)
Capabilities
Cognitive dimension
(a)
Factors (political, military, economic, cultural)
(b)
Conditions (media, communication, information)
(c)
Perceptions
c.
Friendly forces. (Higher, adjacent, and supporting commands and agencies

which will impact friendly operations with regard to media, communication
and information conditions, propaganda potential, etc)
d.
Attachments and detachments. (External forces that may be committed to

own command and forces provided by own command to other commands
including reach-back support)
e.
Given assumptions.
(1)
(2)
Political assumptions
Military assumptions
A - 16
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
f.
Tasks (Mission essential only)
2.
MISSION (clear, concise statement of who, what, when, where, why)
3.
EXECUTION
a.
Commander's intent
(1)
(2)
(3)
b.
Commanders evaluation
(1)
(2)
(3)
c.
The aim of the operation

(a)
Military
(b)
Information strategy/INFO OPS
(c)
Psychological
PSYOPS objectives (derived from military objectives and coordinated
with INFO OPS objectives)
Desired psychological end-state (derived from military end-state)
Centres of gravity (adversary, friendly and own)

(a)
Politico-military
(b)
Cognitive dimension (strengths, vulnerability, susceptibility,
accessibility
Pre-conditions for success (conditions and measurement (MOE)
Risk assessment
(a)
Military
(b)
Psychological and propagandistic (adversarys capabilities and
friendly vulnerabilities)
Concept of operation
(1)
(2)
(3)
General (synopsis of HHQ and para 3.c. (2) and (3))

Operational phases
PSYOPS programming
(a)
Program 1
i.
Narrative description
ii.
Target audience
iii.
Themes and objectives
iv.
Products and actions
(i)
Explanation of method
(ii)
Phasing (if applicable)
(iii)
Product design
(iv)
Impact indicators for MOE
v.
Dissemination
(b)
Program 2, etc.
A - 17
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
d.
Tasks
(1)
(2)
e.
Coordinating instructions
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
4.
Common
Subordinates
Approval authority
Targeting
Reach-back support
Information operations
Public information
Intelligence
(a)
PSYOPS priority intelligence requirements
(b)
Other
CIMIC
Reserves
Timings
Reporting
Product coding and documentation
SERVICE SUPPORT
a.
Logistics concept
b.
Logistic standards and requirements
c.
Movements
d.
Medical support
e.
Personnel
f.
Supply
g.
Host nation support
h.
Funding and contracting support

(1)
(2)
NATO common funding

Areas of responsibility
(a)
Military budget:
CJTF HQ CJ8
(b)
NSIP CIS and communications: CJTF HQ CJ6
(c)
NSIP infrastructure:
CJTF HQ CJ Eng
A - 18
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
5.
COMMAND AND SIGNAL. (Headquarters location, movements, liaison
arrangements, recognition and identification instructions, general rules concerning use of
communication and electronic equipment. This may require an Information Exchange
Annex for further, detailed instruction. Include reference to annex C, Task organisation
and command relationships)
a.
Command and Control
b.
Communications
SIGNATURE BLOCK
ANNEXES:
A - Concept of operations
B - Order of battle
C - Task organisation and command relationships
D - Command and control
E - Others as required
A122. The PSYOPS REPORT (PSYREP). A recommended format for the PSYREP is as
follows:
PSYREP NO
DISTRIBUTION
TO:
INFO:
1. SITUATION
1.1. General
1.2. Target Audience
1.3. Operations
1.3.1. HQ PSYOPS Cell
A. PLANNED ACTIVITIES with PSYOPS Impact

B. ADVERSARY ACTIVITIES AND PROPAGANDA
C. FRIENDLY ACTIVITIES (IOs & NGOs)
1.3.2. CJFPOCC / CJPOTF / PSE
1.3.3. TAC PSYOPS
1.3. .. (others)
1.4. Service Support
1.4.1. PERSONNEL
1.4.2. EQUIPMENT
1.4.3.
BUDGET
CURRENT ACTIVITIES (See attachment)

PLANNED ACTIVITIES (See attachment)
FUTURE INTENTIONS
A. CURRENT ACTIVITIES
B. PLANNED ACTIVITIES
C. FRIENDLY ACTIVITIES
D. ADVERSARY ACTIVITIES
N/A
A - 19
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
1.5 Command and Signal
1.5.1 CIS EQP
1.5.2. PSYOPS SPECIFIC
2. PSYOPS requests
2.1 General
2.2 Specific
3. COM CJFPOCC/CJPOTF/PSE
ASSESSMENT
4. JFC COMMENT
Product support IAW attachment
Attachments. (to the PSYREP)
A - 20
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
ANNEX B
MEDIA FOR PSYOPS USE
Section I - General
B101. Introduction. Media for PSYOPS use are the approved means, technical or
non-technical, which establish any kind of communication with a target audience.
They can be used to supplement or replace direct inter-personal communication in
cases where the audience is inaccessible, unreceptive or simply too large to be
approached exclusively by inter-personal methods.
B102. Categories of media. The various media systems may conveniently be organised
into three groups:
a.
Visual. This embraces all printed material together with silent films, cartoons,
exhibitions, static displays and novelty items (e.g. footballs, ice scrapers).
The most common manifestations of visual media in military PSYOPS are
the poster and the leaflet, although novelty items are becoming more
prevalent. Some chief advantages of visual media are their simplicity,
permanence and the low cost of production.
b.
Audio. All systems that use sound alone to convey the message. This group
includes radio and loudspeakers. While these systems tend to be more
complex and costly than the majority of their visual competitors, they have
the advantage in terms of audience appeal, impact and speed of delivery.
c.
Audio-visual. Any system that makes an appeal to both senses

simultaneously. Television and the cinema are the best-known and most
common examples of this category. By far the most expensive media, they
are highly influential, even within relatively sophisticated societies.
Additionally, wider access to the Internet is making this an increasingly
important audio-visual medium.
B103. Selection of media. The selection of the particular media to be employed in a

PSYOPS effort depends upon a number of factors. The most important of these
are:
a.
Audience impact/receptivity. Whilst certain media are widely regarded as

having a greater impact than others, broad interpretations can be misleading
in their application to specific audiences. Within any given society, some
media may have gained an unusually high (or low) degree of audience
acceptance and credibility due to historical factors, such as the traditional
B-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
quality of production or official control arrangements. The literacy rate,
education/sophistication level, and culture may be responsible for the
preference of selected media among the target audience. Such factors must
be considered when determining which medium is to be employed.
b.
Availability. Physical factors may restrict or preclude the employment of

some media. Typical of these are the expense and hence the shortage of
television and radio transmitting and receiving equipment, or coercive action
by adversary forces designed to prevent the dissemination of printed material
within a target area. Such factors will have been noted in the basic PSYOPS
study and must be continually updated with current intelligence. The amount
of media coverage available can also be dependent on the PSYOPS budget
for buying local broadcasting time or print services.
c.
Timeliness. On occasion, the value of a PSYOPS message will be heavily

dependent upon the speed with which it can be transmitted to the audience.
Other selection criteria may have to take second place to the need for rapid
dissemination.
Section II - Visual media

B104. Introduction. A wide range of media may be employed in a protracted PSYOPS
effort, including radio, TV and film. Such systems are expensive and involve
elaborate planning and preparation before they can be brought into effect. In
short-term campaigns and at the tactical level, printed material in the form of leaflets
and posters has traditionally constituted the bulk of military psychological operations
output.
B105. Employment and characteristics of leaflets and posters. The physical
distinction between a poster and a leaflet is that a leaflet has two sides upon which
messages may be printed, whereas a poster has only one. A more important
difference lies in their manner of employment. A poster is affixed to a static object
and thus has only a transient audience; it must aim to make its point with the
minimum of discussion. A leaflet is potentially mobile, can be read by the recipient
at his or her leisure, and may therefore contain detailed argument.
a.
Advantages. Both the leaflet and the poster enjoy a number of advantages
when compared to other more sophisticated media. These include:
(1)
Cost. The process of production is relatively simple and inexpensive.
(2)
Permanence. A printed message remains in existence until it is

physically destroyed. It is not subject to the vagaries of human
memory, and in leaflet form it may be passed from hand to hand.
B-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(3)
b.
Discrimination. The material may be delivered to a specific target

without acquiring a large, unintended audience.
Disadvantages. Some of the more important limitations on the use of

leaflets and posters are:
(1)
Speed. They lack the immediacy of radio and TV broadcasts.
(2)
Distribution. This can be time-consuming and demanding on logistic

resources and may be severely affected by the tactical situation.
(3)
Audience literacy. It is difficult to transmit complex ideas in print to

illiterate audiences, although the use of illustrations and cartoons may
overcome this problem to some degree.
(4)
Counter-action. The enemy may take punitive action against those

found in possession of printed material.
(5)
Required in-depth coordination. Distribution and dissemination

often requires assets outside PSYOPS unit control (such as airframes,
leaflet bomb casings, security forces, linehaul, etc.)
(6)
Unintended use. The populace may make use of the leaflet/poster

that effectively negates the message that PSYOPS is attempting to
spread.
B106. Principles of visual media design. Whilst the design of a visual product is heavily
dependent upon the message content and the imagination and skill of the artist, it is
nevertheless possible to identify basic components to develop effective PSYOPS
products, based on the knowledge about human perception and the differences
between discernment and insight. The human perception can be represented with
six stages as a process. The following stages are based on each other:
a.
Value orientation. The first task of a product is to gain and maintain the
attention and interest of the target audience. The single way to activate
somebody is to key in on his already existing needs and motives. Therefore,
the PSYOPS product has to consider the current hierarchy of needs and
level of need satisfaction of the selected target audience.
b.
Activation. Activation is only possible if it triggers a response to existing

needs. Needs of the target audience must be identified by PSYOPS, who
then develop themes and messages which are aimed at meeting these
established needs. The recipient must be able to recognise a personal
B-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
benefit from action demanded from him. The product design should amplify
and canalise already existing motives and needs.
The perception of a person can be affected by three kinds of stimuli:
(1)
Emotional stimuli. They cause an immediate emotional response

(Love, peace, little child image).
(2)
Physical stimuli (size, colour and shapes of symbols). They cause

no activation alone. However, they amplify the message.
(3)
Intellectual stimuli (surprise, necessity or contradiction). They draw

the observer into the product.
c.
Reception. A picture is worth a thousand words. The PSYOPS statement

should be understandable in a look and should be immediately credible.
Long text passages and box sentences inhibit fast consumption of
information. slogans, headings, headlines and/or other succinct, clear
messages should be used wherever possible.
d.
Comprehension. The messages of a product must not become

misunderstood and should be easy to recognise. The message or picture
should activate perception and motivate the recipient to act. Pictures and
text must be quickly understandable by themselves and should provide
common information. Therefore, passive voice, vague or confusing
language, ideological or religious discussion, and abstract statements and
symbols are to be avoided.
e.
Memory. In addition to the initial impact of a visual PSYOPS product, the

memory of that product by the target audience is an additional meaningful
factor that requires attention. The level of memory increases through:
Information emphasised in colour, concrete photos, positive statements,
pictorial language and concise text. They may have to be modified
considerably in the light of local communication style.
f.
Impact. A significant precondition might be that the product appears as nonthreatening and stimulates a positive feeling. The effect becomes amplified
through a positive image of the sender, the plausibility of the message and if
a way out of a personal conflict situation is offered to the recipient. The
observer must be able to recognise a personal benefit from action demanded
by it. The product design should amplify and canalise already existing
motives and needs.
B107. Categories of print products.
B-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
a.
Visual PSYOPS products are likely to be informative, persuasive, directive,

or a combination of all three characteristics. Print products are most
effective when they are directed at specific targets and capitalise upon their
immediate situation and needs. In military PSYOPS it may not be possible to
find sufficient skilled staff to design a large volume of special-to-target
products. In this case it will be necessary to fall back on the use of standard
material. Pre-prepared standard print products have the advantage that they
can be kept available in large quantities and the continuity of the PSYOPS
effort can thereby be maintained. The lack of topicality will, however, tend to
lower their effectiveness and for that reason they should normally be rejected
in favour of specially tailored material wherever conditions allow. Common
exceptions to this rule are so-called safe-conduct or surrender leaflets.
These may be stocked in large numbers and disseminated in the area of any
unit whose tactical situation would seem to make it susceptible to such an
appeal. Even in this case, however, a specially prepared leaflet including the
title of the unit, the names of its officers etc, would be more likely to achieve
success.
b.
Print products can be categorised more specifically as:

(1)
Standard. Intended to be relevant in most conditions and against

most members of the target audience for an extended period of time.
(2)
Contingency. Prepared in anticipation of a future event or

circumstance that the force might face.
(3)
Special situation. Prepared at the time to exploit specific conditions

or specific intelligence.
(4)
Safe conduct/surrender. May be standard or special situation.
(5)
News. Similar to a newssheet, but reduced to leaflet size.
(6)
Periodicals. Published not as single products but sequentially, e.g.

newspapers and magazines.
(7)
Aerial dissemination leaflets. These have unique sizes and shapes.
B108. Dissemination. Printed products may be disseminated in a variety of ways

including leaflet artillery rounds, balloons, drones and delivery from aircraft (leaflet
bombs, fused bundle or free-drop). Selection will depend largely upon the
availability of particular delivery system, their dissemination characteristics relative
to the size and location of the target area, and their vulnerability in the prevailing
tactical situation. Depending on the situation the dissemination of handbills and
giveaways can be used as an icebreaker to start conversation with the target
B-5
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
audience; hand-to-hand dissemination has been shown to be the most successful
and appropriate method. Whenever possible standard means of dissemination and
locations (such as street corners or kiosks) should be selected to disseminate
periodicals in order to create an audience of habitual readers.
Section III - Audio media

B109. Employment and characteristics of loudspeaker. Loudspeakers are the
PSYOPS media most responsive to tactical situations with direct contact to the
target audience.
a.
b.
Advantages:
(1)
Selectivity. The short range of loudspeakers makes it possible to

address small, precisely identified targets and to tailor messages
specifically to match their conditions.
(2)
Appeal. Loudspeakers are in effect an extension of face-to-face

communication. Although the dialogue is one-sided, it may be
possible to establish a degree of rapport with the audience.
(3)
Mobility. Depending upon the particular equipment in use,

loudspeakers may be man-packed or fitted to any form of vehicle,
including aircraft and helicopters.
(4)
Simplicity. Loudspeakers are simple to operate, easy to maintain,

relatively inexpensive to purchase and they do not require the
audience to be in possession of special receiving equipment.
(5)
Speed. Only a very brief period of time is required in which to prepare

a spoken message, although there may be time delays in approval or
if translation and/or recording is required.
Limitations. Limitations on the use of loudspeakers include:

(1)
Vulnerability. The short range and overt operation of loudspeakers

renders the equipment and its operators vulnerable to enemy action.
This danger is particularly acute when using aircraft-mounted
equipment. The risk to personnel operating ground-based equipment
can be reduced to some extent by the use of remote terminals.
(2)
Physical constraints. Thunder, humidity, high temperatures, terrain

variations, competing noise and dense vegetation all tend to impair
audibility and reduce effective range.
B-6
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
B110. Message format. Loudspeaker messages may be transmitted live by an

announcer or be pre-recorded. In either case, the message length must be kept
short, particularly when an air platform is used. Unnecessarily lengthy messages
invite enemy counter-action and will often tend to confuse the audience. The
message text itself should be constructed in a number of clear simple sentences.
Key words and slogan must be repeated several times within a single message in
order to achieve maximum impact.
Loudspeaker messages should be designed according to the 'AIDA' scheme
(Attention, Information, Desire and Action):
a.
Attention. The first task of a loudspeaker message is to gain and hold the
attention of the target audience. Means of achieving this include the use of
jingles, local music, sound effects or well known, accepted local opinion
leaders.
b.
Information. The text must contain information which is both credible and
acceptable to the target audience and which will draw the listener along the
intended line of reasoning.
c.
Desire. The combined effect of the attention-getting device and the

informative text should uncover or re-awaken the desire to fulfil a
psychological need.
d.
Action. Finally, the audience is presented with a suggested course of

conduct through which the revealed need can be satisfied.
B111. Preparation and broadcasting

a.
Live messages have the advantage of flexibility in that they can be prepared
directly before broadcasting. The message content can then incorporate
information of immediate interest to the audience. Live messages involve
the use of a live microphone which requires high proficiency of the
announcer with respect to voice modulation and overcoming background
noise. Against this must be balanced the danger of loudspeaker teams
broadcasting hastily drafted and ill-researched material.
b.
Pre-recorded messages prepared under studio conditions have great clarity

and may be re-transmitted as many times as required without risk of
inadvertent change in content. The use of recordings, however, removes the
ability of the operator to take immediate advantage of sudden feedback from
the audience.
B112. Selection of announcers

B-7
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
a.
An announcer should be chosen primarily on the basis of his or her clarity of

voice and correct colloquial pronunciation of the language in use, although a
foreign audience will not expect native speaker qualification from a NATO
source. It is also desirable that his or her voice should carry conviction and
suggest a personality appropriate to the material being transmitted. While
not essential, much benefit will result if the announcer has sufficient local
knowledge and creative insight to contribute to the drafting of his/her own
scripts.
b.
The use of indigenous personnel, possibly including defectors, is a simple

and effective way of meeting the problem of language or dialect. However, if
this method is employed, special attention must be paid to the question of
security, including the physical security of locals working for NATO. In
particular, all recorded material must be checked for accuracy of content by a
trusted interpreter. Live transmissions should only be made by local
nationals of proven loyalty. Every effort should be taken to provide at least
one military interpreter for a PSYOPS unit for checking samples of
translations and for interpreting in sensitive situation.
B113. Radio. Radio broadcasting is exceptionally well suited to the dissemination of

PSYOPS products. Its range, timeliness and versatility enable the psychological
operator to transmit information to a mass audience with a speed that is rivalled
only by TV.
a.
Advantages: Its most important characteristics are:

(1)
Speed. Programme material can be prepared or amended in a very

short space of time. This enables the psychological operator to take
immediate advantage of new information or of rapid and unexpected
changes in the military or political situation.
(2)
Range and coverage. Depending upon the frequencies available,

radio broadcasts may be made over great distances giving access to
large potential audiences.
(3)
Audience attention. Listening to a radio broadcast requires no effort

on the part of the audience, nor need it prevent other tasks being
carried out concurrently. Listening readily develops into a habit.
(4)
Versatility. Wide ranges of programme formats are available to the

broadcaster, including drama, music, news, talks and discussions.
Careful target analysis will make it possible to identify and exploit
those types of programme which are most favoured by the intended
audience.
B-8
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
(5)
Familiarity. A reliable and well-planned radio service will tend to

generate a following of loyal listeners who will increasingly identify
themselves with the station, its broadcasting personalities and
ultimately its underlying political or other themes.
(6)
Emotional impact. Radio has all the emotive power of the spoken
word. A skilled producer can exert considerable influence over an
audience by careful selection of announcers and broadcasters and the
popularising of their public image. Where radio listening is a group
activity, as in many underdeveloped nations, then this will tend to
heighten the emotional impact of presentations.
Limitations. A PSYOPS medium of exceptional value, radio nevertheless

suffers from certain limitations, the most significant limitations being:
(1)
Jamming.
It is a relatively simple operation to jam radio
transmissions, although the initial cost of investment in the necessary
technical equipment is high.
(2)
Technical limitations/requirements. Radio signals can be distorted

by atmospheric conditions or other natural hazards.
Such
circumstances may seriously degrade the range and coverage of a
transmitter. Early and close cooperation with the CJ6 for transmitter
site selection and broadcast frequency management is essential for
effective radio broadcast.
(3)
Availability of receivers. The ownership or use of receivers within a

target area may be restricted by virtue of their cost or as a result of
censorship measures. Where the price of radios is a significant factor,
the audience will be largely limited to the upper income groups.
Censorship arrangements may, in some areas, include the installation
of landline relay systems, thus allowing the private possession of
receivers to be outlawed entirely.
(4)
Power. Radio receivers are dependent upon a power source, either

mains or batteries. The physical and economic disruptions of war
may deny such resources to the audience. The provision of wind-up
radios may go some way to overcoming these difficulties.
(5)
Impermanence. Radio broadcasting is a transitory medium; it leaves

no permanent record and in consequence its messages may be
forgotten or become distorted with the passage of time.
B-9
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(6)
Competition. A very large number of foreign broadcasting stations

are in operation throughout the world. These, together with any
additional facilities that may be established by an opponent to meet
his needs in a particular conflict, will compete for the attention of the
audience.
B114. Principles for use of radio. In establishing a radio service, certain principles need
to be considered if an audience is to be gained and held:
a.
Reliability of service. The station must operate to a well-advertised

schedule of times, frequencies, and programmes that takes account of the
established listening habits of the target audience. Variations from this
pattern should be avoided or, if absolutely essential, should be notified well
in advance.
b.
Repetition. It is to be expected that various elements of the audience will

listen to the service at different times during the programme day. Similarly,
the degree of attention given to a broadcast by the members of its audience
will vary throughout the listening period. For these reasons it will be
necessary to repeat key items a number of times in order to ensure that they
have been fully absorbed by the whole audience.
c.
Credibility. It is particularly important that a sustained effort be made to

build up credibility in the minds of the audience. The temptations to risk
credibility in order to achieve some short-term gain must be resisted.
d.
Programme content. Programme material should be prepared and

scheduled to a logical plan, based upon the audience's known interests and
listening habits. Programme content should meet or exceed the standards of
presentation achieved by local services. It is not sufficient for the PSYOPS
message alone to be carefully and correctly framed. If it is to gain a hearing,
the material into which it is inserted must be sufficiently attractive to draw an
audience.
e.
Balance. A stereotyped and unchanging programme schedule will engender

boredom in the audience and a reduction in the numbers listening to the
station. Programmes must therefore be varied, interspersing news and
current affairs material with music, drama or other more entertaining items.
In this way a balanced output will be achieved which amuses and entertains
while concurrently disseminating PSYOPS messages.
f.
Performer selection. Radio announcers and performers often become

respected and popular figures in their own right and thereby add weight to
the material that they present. Staff should be selected on the basis of their
B - 10
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
radio personality, and voice quality. Where possible, appropriately selected
and trained locally employed staff should be used.
Section IV - Audio-visual media

B115. Introduction. Print products and loudspeaker broadcasts are likely to comprise the
bulk of military PSYOPS output in any campaign by virtue of their simplicity,
flexibility and low cost. There may be occasions when access may be gained to
more sophisticated media. PSYOPS planners should have a clear understanding of
the capabilities of these media and the principles governing their effective use.
Radio, cinema, TV and the performing arts share the common characteristics of
complexity and expense. To build up and maintain a loyal and receptive audience
it will be necessary to generate a continuous flow of new material. This will demand
a large specialist staff of authors, technicians and cast. radio, TV and, to a lesser
extent, the cinema require expensive production, transmission and reception
facilities and equipment. It is unlikely that these media will be available to the
military on an exclusive basis unless dedicated equipment and manpower assets
are procured and established. It may be possible to disseminate military PSYOPS
material through civilian distribution networks.
B116. Television. TV is potentially the most influential of all communications media. It
has much of' the visual impact of the cinema, to which is added the immediacy of
radio. Combined with these qualities is the intimacy resulting from its position in the
home or community meeting place and the tendency for it to be used as an habitual
stimulant and entertainment.
a.
b.
Advantages. Additional characteristics of particular advantage in the

conduct of a PSYOPS effort are:
(1)
Speed. Like radio, TV can respond very rapidly to new or changing

situations and thereby take advantage of fleeting opportunities.
(2)
Literacy. There is no requirement for TV viewers to be literate.
(3)
Cross-cultural communication. TV has developed its own style of

approach that is far less dependent upon local traditional forms than
the older media. These factors combine to lower the cultural
specificity of TV presentation methods and thus simplify the task of
the psychological operator.
Limitations of TV. Despite its considerable advantages as a means of

dissemination, TV suffers from certain limitations:
B - 11
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(1)
Range. The range of ordinary TV transmissions is not extensive and

can only be increased by the use of costly and vulnerable rebroadcast facilities. However, transmission by satellite negates this
limitation to a large degree. Certainly, in some areas of the world,
satellite TV reception is used more prevalently than terrestrial or cable
means of delivery.
(2)
Distribution of receivers. The cost of TV receivers severely limits

their availability in many parts of the world, as does the need for some
source of electrical power. Those sets that do exist may often be
concentrated in the hands of the upper income groups. In some
societies the viewing of television is a communal activity where the
television set replaces cinema houses. The strategic potential of
satellite TV is dependent on target audiences having the necessary
equipment to receive transmissions.
(3)
Impermanence and competition. As with radio, TV is a transitory

medium. Equally it can suffer from competition although its range
makes this less common than with radio.
(4)
Administrative overheads. TV transmitters are expensive to

construct and their maintenance and operation demands a
considerable number of technical staff. A large quantity of programme
material is needed to fill even the most modest schedule, and this also
will be costly in both personnel and finance.
B117. Television and combat targets. TV has an increasing potential as a PSYOPS

medium and has an obvious role in CRPO. It has yet to achieve any major impact
against combat targets, as enemy troops in combat are unlikely to have access to
receivers. However, its use in terms of CPO should not be discounted, particularly
to communicate with civilians under enemy control in the combat area and with
enemy troops in the rear areas. The cost and technical complexity of production
and dissemination suggest that any use of TV for military PSYOPS may be confined
to exploitation of the facilities of existing civilian networks.
B118. Cinema. Movies, film trailers and spots are influential media that still retain
enormous popularity, especially in areas where TV is not widely available.
a.
Advantages. The many advantages of the cinema include:

(1)
Credibility. The impact of a well-produced film tends to override the

limited critical faculties of an unsophisticated audience. The message
contained within it is often absorbed with little or no resistance,
provided that it does not conflict directly with core values and
attitudes.
B - 12
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
(2)
Literacy. As with radio and TV, there is no requirement for the

audience to be literate.
(3)
Emotional identification. The highly developed characterisation,

which is a feature of many films, encourages the audience to identify
with the situation and behaviour of the principal actors both in their
film roles and in real life. This enhances the PSYOPS potential of the
medium and may promote the influence of individual actors to such a
degree that they may subsequently be employed as key
communicators.
(4)
Audience recall. The degree of audience involvement in film

presentations ensures a high degree and duration of recall.
Limitations. Factors which limit the availability and usefulness of the

cinema as a PSYOPS medium are:
(1)
Expense. The specialised staff and equipment required to produce a

film are extremely costly. If established actors are employed, then the
expense will be greater still.
(2)
Time. Film production is a slow process, which it is difficult to hasten

without a loss in quality. It is therefore impossible to apply this
medium to short-term goals.
(3)
Audience restrictions. The distribution and presentation of films can

be readily controlled by governmental audiences. The use of this
medium in a hostile political environment is thereby effectively ruled
out, although the increasing availability of video equipment (VCR and
DVD) presents the opportunity to directly disseminate copies of the
cinema product to the target audience.
B119. Internet. The Internet differs from the other media described mainly on two
accounts. First it is in principle unlimited in reach. Second it is a medium where the
target audience has to actively seek information, and where PSYOPS messages
will compete for attention with a lot of other information, including information
provided by adversaries. This leads to a strong requirement for making the material
published interesting. At present there are in general three ways of using the
Internet in PSYOPS: Operating a home page, sending e-mails, addressed to
specific and selected targets, and having a chat room. A home page will be
generally available to a large audience, whereas targets for e-mail can be groups or
individual persons. Chat rooms will normally be directed at groups.
a.
Advantages
B - 13
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
(1)
Reach. Due to the virtually unlimited reach of the Internet it is

possible to readily access target audiences worldwide.
(2)
Speed. An important characteristic of the Internet is the virtual

instantaneous availability of the messages worldwide. This makes it
easy and quick to produce messages far away from the target
audience. However, an adversary is likewise able to publish over long
distances quickly.
(3)
Cheap. As a means of dissemination the Internet is cheap. However,

the editorial skills and facilities of the required quality may not be.
b.
Limitations. When using websites NATO units has to take the relationship to
Press & Information activities in to consideration, according to Guidelines for
PSYOPS websites.
c.
Disadvantages
(1)
Reach. Due to the unlimited reach of the Internet it is virtually

impossible to limit the availability of information published to selected
audiences, unless it is sent directly to the target audience as e-mail.
This increases the requirement to minimise the negative impact of
messages on unintended target audiences.
(2)
Computer availability and literacy. Since the target audience has to

be able to access the Internet; computers, network access and the
ability to exploit the technology have to be available, there are at
present limits in the reach in less developed areas. However, target
audiences in the NATO countries are easily accessible by
adversaries.
(3)
Anonymity. On the Internet it is easy to hide the true identity of the

originator of a message.
(4)
Competition. With a lot of very different information being readily

available on the Internet, the PSYOPS messages have to appeal to
the target audiences much more than in most other media.
(5)
Manipulation. This electronic medium may be easily modified by

adversaries and other parties.
B120. Emerging technologies. As the global information environment evolves based on

advances in digital and other technologies, new media and means of reaching
target audiences will become increasingly available to PSYOPS. These emerging
B - 14
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
technologies may or may not fit into the current categories of audio, visual, or audiovisual media but that should not limit PSYOPS planners in leveraging these
advances in technology. Some obvious examples of these new technologies are
mobile/cellular phone systems, digital text messaging, use of nano-technologies,
and focused/directed broadcasting. The only limitation in using these advances is
the creativity and imagination of the PSYOPS planner.
Section V Product design review
B121. An internal product review board (PRB) should be established within the
CJFPOCC/CJPOTF/PSE to ensure that all products designed by the product
development centre (PDC)/media section meet the requirements of the PSYOPS
commander before any product leaves for external approval. An additional purpose
is to harmonise comments made by the staff elements and other (civil/military)
agencies involved. The meetings of the PRB may be chaired by the chief,
PDC/media Section.
B122. All PSYOPS products should be pre-tested prior to approval. This can be done best
either by a testing element within the TAA section or by using tactical PSYOPS
teams. After the dissemination of PSYOPS products, target audience reaction
should be post-tested and the results sent to the TAA/TES for analysis. A small
guide added to each product package for post-testing by dissemination personnel is
useful.
B - 15
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
B123. PRB checklist. The checklist may assist in the internal PSYOPS product review
process. Figure B1 is an example that can be modified as necessary.
PRODUCT REVIEW BOARD CHECKLIST

- Feedback / Expert Opinion Louds
Print
MEDIUM:
Radio
TV/Video
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

1. MISSION:
YES
Does the product meet the mission requirements?
PARTLY
NO
2. VALUE ORIENTATION: Does the product address the needs of

the target audience?
YES
PARTLY
NO
3. ACTIVATION:
What stimuli are used in order to attract the
attention of the target audience?
Emotional
Physical
Intellectual
4. RECEPTION:
What do you think is(are) the message(s) of
the product? (several answers possible)
__________________________________________________________
5. COMPREHENSION:
Can the message(s) be understood...
- clearly?
YES
PARTLY
NO
- completely?
YES
PARTLY
NO
6. MEMORY: Are the key points of the message(s) emphasised

in order to enhance the memory effect?
YES
PARTLY
NO
7. CONSUMER BENEFIT: What personal benefit is offered to the

target audience?
__________________________________________________________
8. PERCEPTION: What overall image does the product convey of...
- the product?
- the producer?
____________________________________
___________________________________________
Figure B1. - PRB Checklist.
B - 16
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
ANNEX C
ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR
Section I The motivation of the individual

C101. General. Motivation, in general, represents a direct and dynamic component of
behaviour, which is determined by a combination of biological, social, and learning
factors. Motivation activates behaviour in pursuit of a goal. Current motivational
needs influence perception, reasoning, learning and other psychological processes.
Its main characteristics are:
a.
Motivation is tied to inner conditions and processes, which can only be

observed indirectly, through its behavioural outputs.
b.
Motivation is not always equal to behaviour, as behaviour tends also to be

determined by biological, social, and cultural factors along with perception,
reasoning, learning and other psychological processes.
c.
The result of motivation is almost always some kind of activity.
d.
Motivated behaviour can be described by energy mobilization; persistent,

intensive and effective behaviour; direction towards an objective; and change
in behaviour dependant upon consequences.
e.
Human behaviour is directed towards an objective. As soon as the objective

is achieved, this need is satisfied.
f.
As soon as one need is satisfied, others occur; therefore, motivation and the
requirement to satisfy needs is a never-ending process.
C102. Hierarchy of needs/motives. From an individuals point of view, the most

important drive (which also determines behaviour) is the desire to satisfy his or her
individual needs. These range from simple physical requirements of the body
(hunger, thirst, etc.) to complex psychological demands such as the desire for
recognition and self-esteem. These various needs can be represented as a
hierarchy, with the most fundamental and primitive at the bottom of the scale, and
the most complex and abstract at the top (see Figure C-1 below). The theory of
motivation suggests that individual needs can be described by a scale of
satisfaction. However, not all target audiences rate.
C-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
NEEDS
EXAMPLE
Selfactualisation
Fullfilment of
potential
Esteem
Recognition
Social needs
Group
membership,
social contacts
Safety
Peace,
demining,
law and order
Physiological
needs
Food,
shelter
Figure C-1. Hierarchy of needs by Maslow
the factors on the scale the same way. For example, one target audience may rate
the need for Esteem as very important while a different target audience may
consider it less important. Additionally, some audiences tend to focus on the next
higher level of need automatically if the lower need has already been satisfied,
while others remain focused on the same level of needs, even though those needs
have already been satisfied.
C103. Significance of motivation in PSYOPS. Basic knowledge about individual
motivation gives the PSYOPS planner the opportunity to analyse and identify the
needs of the target audience and provides the basis to achieve PSYOPS
objectives. Lower needs should be met first. For example, as long as a TA is
starving, the PSYOPS planner can hardly expect that TA to be interested in
education. First offering them food and then, sometime later, showing them ways
how to make their own food (helping the TA to help themselves) will make our
messages more effective.
C-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Section II Socialization and individualization
C104. General. Every target audience is a collection of individuals. If we want to be
successful in changing and consolidating behaviour of target audiences in general,
we need to focus on the individual, or at least know and understand the functioning
of the individual within a particular group. Every individual is born into alreadyformed and -organized societies, each with its own set of social and cultural
characteristics, norms, values, traditions, and general rules of behaviour. During an
individuals socialization process, he adapts to these aspects if his society. Basic
knowledge about the socialization process is a key for the successful conduct of
PSYOPS.
C105. Socialization. Socialization is the process of growth of an individual into his
society. During this process, the individual adopts certain values, rules,
expectations, and roles. The individual also learns the patterns of decision-making
and behaviour in accordance with that societys social and cultural norms. Basic
socialization takes place at an extremely early age normally as an individual is
first learning to speak.
C106. Individualization. Individualization is a process of developing ones personality: his
or her basic, unique characteristics, interests, will, emotions, character, and
temperament. Through education and socialization, the society is trying to shape
an individuals personality to fit that societys own social expectations, while the
individual only adapts to norms and requirements that are in accordance with his
needs and interests. Individual interests vary from society to society, but there are
some individual interests common to many societies (e.g. freedom, a sense of
belonging, confirmation, creativity, selfactualisation, et.al.).
C107. Definition of attitude. The concept of attitude can be defined as relatively
enduring and consistent systems of judgements, emotions and action tendencies
towards different objects, which pre-dispose an individual to behave in certain ways
to achieve particular objectives and goals. Attitude can be positive or negative.
By this definition, an attitude is derived from one or more of three components:
a.
Cognitive component, including beliefs and value judgments regarding a

specific subject (e.g., I believe that all nations are equal).
b.
Emotional component, including the emotional relation towards a particular

subject (e.g., I feel affection towards all nations).
c.
Action component, which includes tendencies to act in accordance with

ones attitudes (e.g. I will defend the equality of all nations and Im prepared
to fight in support of this belief).
C108. Attitude formation and development. The main key in formation and
C-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
development of attitude is the process of social learning. Many or our attitudes are
adopted from other individuals in our environment, especially from those who raise
us and from those individuals we tend to follow and identify with, while other
attitudes are formed solely through our own judgement. Some are very firm and
unchangeable, which is especially harmful when we are dealing with attitudes
because they are based on prejudgements. Prejudgements are broad, usually
groundless, and deep-rooted assumptions about people and phenomenon. Very
generalized and rigid prejudgements are often categorized as stereotypes.
C109. Attitude change. Attitudes tend to bring some kind of order into our lives. But
even if they are relatively enduring and consistent, attitudes can be changed. New
situations and changes in environment can often bring about a change of attitude.
Changes in attitude are usually based on:
a.
New experiences, especially when dealing with very emotional and

shocking events (e.g., a normally peaceful people will tend to fight if their
country is attacked).
b.
Accordance tendency. We tend to keep attitudes in accordance with

ourselves and with the society we live in. We perceive discordance in
attitudes as a tension that has to be eliminated (e.g., those in need of help,
refusing help, because they see themselves as capable and independent
enough). We will change our attitude to keep it in accord with what we
perceive the societal attitude to be.
c.
Attribution. Attitudes can change based on the causes we tend to attribute

to certain phenomenon (e.g., ineffectiveness of PSYOPS can be seen as a
target audiences resistance or our own improper approach to the TA, neither
of which may be the real cause of the ineffectiveness).
Individuals attitudes are easier to change than generally accepted social
attitudes.
C110. Degrees of attitude change. The extent and nature of attitudinal change
engendered by PSYOPS or other influences can be categorized into:
a.
Compliance. This is the simplest and least enduring form of change. It

results from a conscious decision by members of the target audience to
accede to the demands of the psychological operator as a result of threats or
inducements offered to him. As it is a calculated and expedient move by the
target audience, it is unlikely to endure once the presence of the threat or the
reward is removed. In this sense it hardly constitutes a change of attitude at
all - rather, it is a temporary and pragmatic change of behaviour. However,
on the battlefield such a temporary change may be all that is required to
achieve a psychological objective.
C-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
Identification. A more reliable form of attitude change, identification results

when a target audience chooses to associate itself with the opinions and
attitudes of a particular individual or group. Emulation of behaviour follows
as a natural consequence. This form of change is more long lasting than
compliance, provided that the emulated group or individual continues to
adhere to the psychological operators aims.
c.
Internalisation. This occurs when the target audience accepts the attitudes
of the psychological operator as its own. Once internalised, these new
attitudes may become as firmly entrenched as other, longer held views. For
internalisation to occur, the attitudes proposed must be fully compatible with
existing target audience norms, beliefs, and values.
C111. An individual tends to put focus and value on certain persons, objects, phenomena,
and situations that can usually satisfy his needs. These are highly determined by
previous experience and by the influences and examples of other people.
a.
Interests. Interests are activities we perceive as more appealing than others.

We want to conduct them and make progress in them.
b.
Values. Values are phenomena and actions that we tend to value as good,
desirable, or proper in the sense of morality. Often, individuals will have
different values (individual values) than those common to most people
(universal values), and to the values that specific societies tend to enforce on
its members (social values).
c.
Value tendencies and hierarchy. Values and their importance vary

between individuals as well as between social groups and are mostly socially
and historically based.
d.
Morality is a collection of beliefs and assumptions about what is right or

wrong from the aspect of social attitudes and ethics (moral and ethical
values). By default society encourages behaviour patterns that are in
accordance with social morality.
e.
Social norms are the written and unwritten rules of acceptable behaviour
that tend to bring order and stability into social life.
f.
Social sanctions are rules about how to deal with individuals who do not
subordinate themselves to acceptable social norms.
All of the phenomena above are relatively enduring and rigid, and are usually based
on tradition and cultural characteristics. They are adopted through the process of
socialisation and they determine an individuals behavioural patterns.
C-5
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
It is important for ones actions, to be in accordance with his or her interests as well
as with interests of society in general. Effective coordination between personal
interests and social interests as well as social interests of different groups, form the
basis of existence and accordance of different social groups and wider social
community.
C112. Significance of socialisation in PSYOPS. Since socialization is a never- ending
process, the role of PSYOPS is to intervene in this process. Basic knowledge about
the process and elements to socialization is a key of understanding target
audiences functioning and behaviour and choosing methods, which can interfere in
subtle way, and are therefore more likely to be effective. Some general rules, which
can also apply to PSYOPS, are:
a.
As their identity is not yet formed, influencing younger people (age 7-21) is
more likely to be effective.
b.
Attitudes are more likely to be changed, in comparison to values and norms,

which are usually more rigid, entrenched and based on cultural and historical
characteristics.
c.
Changing attitudes of uncommitted is more likely to be effective, than

changing attitudes of adversaries.
d.
Written norms and sanctions (law) can be very different than unwritten and
not necessarily more respected. We should be careful not to provoke
unwanted reactions (e.g. In some cultures revenge or punishment in the
sense of hurting family members is still accepted, even if the law states
otherwise).
Section III Social groups

C113. Definition. Social group can be defined as a social formation, formed by more than
two individuals. Its most important characteristics are:
a.
Social interaction.
b.
Psychological closeness.
c.
Common interests.
d.
Cooperation.
e.
Typical communication between members.

C-6
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
f.
Interdependence.
g.
Common norms and rules of behaviour.
h.
Common and clear objectives.
An individual can be a member of different groups at the same time. Joining a group
includes identification with other members and adopting rules and norms as well as
offering support and devotion to the group.
C114. Primary and secondary groups. Social psychology usually separates groups into
two types:
a.
Primary groups. The most important characteristics are direct interaction

between group members and verbal and nonverbal communication. Strong
emotional bonds usually hold primary groups together. Some examples of
primary groups are families, work teams, school classes, and military units.
b.
Secondary groups. The most obvious characteristic is indirect

communication through indirect means of communication and mass media.
Primary groups can be parts of secondary groups (e.g., a countrys army
represents a secondary group, whereas a platoon of that army could be a
primary group). Examples of secondary groups are political parties, sports or
cultural associations, et.al..
C115. Group leadership. All groups have some kind of leadership.

a.
A formal leader is formally appointed (e.g., through an election).
b.
An informal leader is not formally chosen, but usually holds referential power,
because his or her influence results from his personality or personal
authority. Informal leaders are often more powerful than formal leaders.
From the aspect of leadership, the ideal situation is when formal and informal
leadership is found in the same person. Among members of group, there is a
constant interest to secure/protect common objectives, common interests, and
uniformity of attitudes, in which the leader also plays a vital role. TA analysts, as
well as PSYOPS planners, have to put special attention on identifying and choosing
the individuals within the TA who posses the greatest referential power and
therefore have the most influence on a target audience. Additionally, when
possible, an informal leader should be chosen as a key communicator.
C116. In-groups and out-groups. Joining a group often implies the rejection of one or
more alternative associations. This more or less arbitrary self-exclusion from other
C-7
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
groups must be continually justified in the minds of the members of the group. This
is commonly achieved by identifying the chosen association as in-group', which
deserves full support and allegiance, and by extension, any persons outside the
organization are labelled as the 'out-group', to be treated with caution or even
hostility. In conducting PSYOPS, we focus on exploiting these differences between
in-groups and out-groups when our goal is a divisive one. On the other hand, the
focus should be on similarities and characteristics common to among different if our
goal is one of unity. Emphasizing common interests and characteristics can
influence the reduction of hostilities between groups.
C117. Crowd. A crowd can be defined as a large number of people collected into a
somewhat compact body without order. Its main characteristics are:
a.
Low degree of organization. Individuals within the crowd are not important
with the exception of the crowds leadership.
b.
Extremely intense emotions like fear, anger, excitement, and enthusiasm.

Thinking is less effective, and social breaks are weakened, because of
apparent invisibility within the larger crowd.
c.
High intensity of activity.
d.
Communication within the crowd is often nonverbal.
C118. In a large crowd, people tend to behave differently than in smaller groups. Because
of the physical closeness and mutual influence, a crowd can be categorized as a
primary group, however the influence of secondary groups can also be transferred
to a crowd through representatives of secondary groups within the crowd. Their
influence often has great impact and tends to be critical (e.g., different political
parties summoning their members to attend joint rallies against a common
adversary).
C119. Behaviour of people in crowds can be influenced through suggestion. Suggestion in
this case represents verbal or nonverbal forms of communication in which one
person influences others indirectly, without using force, orders or arguments.
Suggestion tends to weaken critical thinking and results in following the words of
speakers within the crowd. Of course, the same conditions apply as in the case of
group leadership the speaker has to have recognized referential power by the
crowd.
C120. A kernel group is a smaller group within the crowd that usually takes over the
initiative and acts as an example for others. The number of kernel groups depends
on the size of the crowd. From the PSYOPS aspect, kernel groups can be used to
influence mass.
C-8
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
C121. An invisible crowd represents the large numbers of people who receive the same
TV or radio broadcast, or read the same newspaper. This crowd, although not
physically located at the same place or time provides a large opportunity for
conducting PSYOPS to influence target audiences (e.g., Orson Welles famous
1930s radio broadcast that drove masses of people into a panic). An important
cause for activating crowds is social crisis and rapid changes within a social
system. Rapid changes put stress on people and tend to make them insecure.
This phenomenon requires special consideration from the PSYOPS point of view.
C122. Military groups. When talking about military groups, we should distinguish
between military and paramilitary groups, since they tend to have some differences.
a.
Military groups are generally large and are based on principles of

subordination and discipline.
b.
Paramilitary groups are normally focused on the interests of a smaller group,

and they tend to act on the basis of intense emotions. Leadership is usually
taken over by one individual or a very small group and differs from the
organized, formal leadership found in military groups.
Section IV Communication
C123. General. All psychological operations are accomplished through some type of
communication. Communication may take many different forms, from gestures of
peace or friendship to the most complex arrangements of natural, audio, and visual
stimuli. The basic purpose is the same: to convey a message to a chosen recipient
without any loss or change to its original meaning.
C124. The communication process
a.
A psychological operations message originates with a sender who frames

the concept to be transmitted. To be effective, the message must be
designed to accomplish some specific objective, which will have been
chosen by analysing the sponsor's aims with the known vulnerabilities of the
TA. A particular TA is identified and the message tailored to match the
known attitudes and susceptibilities of the TA. The most effective messages
are ones addressed to specific groups and individuals within a TA. Once
successfully adopted by these key communicators, they are then passed
forward to others within the TA.
b.
At its conception, a message will be expressed in the language and symbols

of the originator's culture. In order that a transfer of ideas may occur, it is
necessary for the message to be translated into terms that are meaningful to
the intended recipient. Where both the sender and the receiver are members
C-9
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
of the same society this will be a fairly simple procedure, involving only the
adjustment of language to account for regional or idiomatic differences. And
in the case of illiteracy, the whole message will have to be converted into
picture language incorporating attractive and relevant symbols. The process
of translation must be carried out with great care if the message is not to lose
its original meaning or gain some unintended nuance. The pre-testing of
material acts as a safeguard in this respect.
c.
In constructing and translating the message, the problem of 'noise' must be

considered. In this context, 'noise' is regarded as anything that may impede
the process of communication or distort the message. Examples include the
inherent capacity of some messages to be misunderstood owing to
excessive complexity and length, or the confusion that may result from literal
translations between languages. If such difficulties arise it will be necessary
to redraft the message in such a way as to eliminate the noise.
d.
Media selection will be based upon both practical and psychological

considerations. Obviously the medium chosen must be available to both
sender and receiver and it must be influential in the mind of the receiver.
e.
Once the message has been transmitted, the TA must be kept under
surveillance in order to determine its effect. Particular attention should be
paid to any unexpected consequences that may suggest that translation was
faulty or that noise impeded or distorted the transmission. Post-testing is a
key method of conducting target audience surveillance.
C125. Cross-cultural communication. PSYOPS messages may fail to achieve their

purpose as a result of the sender failing to comprehend fully the values and
sensibilities of the TA. As PSYOPS usually involves cross-cultural communication,
it is necessary to examine the most common areas of difficulty in communicating
across cultural divides:
a.
Value assumptions. Each society develops its own set of goals for its
constituent members and groups. In framing a PSYOPS message, the
drafter may fail to perceive that those achievements and objectives upon
which he has been conditioned to place a high value are of considerably less
importance to his TA. This fundamental error can result in a message that
may contain irrelevant or unattractive blandishments, or may suggest
rewards that are inappropriate or insulting to the target.
b.
Symbols. Effective PSYOPS products make use of symbols such as colour,

music, or artistic forms. The weight and meaning of these can differ
dramatically from one society to another (e.g., the use of both black and
white as the symbol for death and mourning in different parts of the world).
Because of the value that symbols hold, their true meaning to the target
C - 10
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
audience must be thoroughly researched and tested before they are
employed.
c.
Social conduct and mannerism. In many societies the observance of

certain codes of etiquette are crucial to the reputation and credibility of a
communicator. Material that inadvertently depicts transgressions of these
behavioural patterns will lack any prestige or influence and may become the
subject of derision or contempt.
d.
Language. Direct, literal translation from one language to another is unlikely

to satisfy the needs of effective PSYOPS. It is necessary to weigh the intent
and underlying theme of the original material and find words and expressions
in the final language that have similar emotional impact. The employment of
native speakers, as distinct from trained linguists, is very likely to be of
particular benefit in avoiding errors in translation.
C126. Overcoming cultural differences. The dangers and difficulties in communicating

with persons of a different cultural tradition are only likely to be overcome if two
conditions are met: (1) PSYOPS personnel must be provided with the fullest
possible information about the target audience, including not only current
psychological intelligence but also a complete picture of the society of which the
audience forms a part; and (2) PSYOPS products must be pre-tested on
representative audiences before their release.
After the PSYOPS program is initiated, it must be closely monitored through posttesting. Any identified mistakes must be rectified as soon as possible. The
continuous monitoring of the PSYOPS program and the target audiences reaction
takes on the utmost importance because, even if the pre-testing is done in a correct
way, there is no guarantee that the chosen sample of the TA is truly representative.
C127. PSYOPS and communication
a.
Means. The means used for the transfer of PSYOPS messages encompass
all the usual means of human communication like word-of-mouth, books,
newspapers, loudspeakers, radio, TV, etc. They also include emerging
technologies that allow messages to be transferred from senders to receivers
(such as mobile phones, e-mail, etc.)
b.
When conducting PSYOPS, planners should emphasize the use of key

communicators as they are the ones who can transfer messages to the TA
most effectively. Key elements when considering the use of key
communicators are authority, group belonging, and the attraction of the
source. For maximum effectiveness of PSYOPS, a credible source of
information is necessary. In the minds of the TA, a key communicator should
be one of them: a persuasive and powerful speaker.
C - 11
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
c.
Messages. The following should be taken into consideration when crafting

PSYOPS messages: message visibility, accessibility, appeal, clarity,
simplicity, persuasiveness, the principal of need (i.e., promising the TA you
will fulfil their needs), and the principle of unpredictability (i.e., using soft
methods of persuasion, which allow for adaptation to possible changes).
d.
PSYOPS communication techniques. The following are examples of

messaging techniques that have been shown to be successful:
(1)
Emotional sandwich (emotions message emotions).
(2)
Emotional transfer (e.g., a flyer with an emotional component like nice

pictures, overwritten by the PSYOPS message).
(3)
Use of emotionally loaded words.
(4)
Use of stereotypes.
C - 12
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
ANNEX D
COUNTER PSYOPS TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES
Section I - Analysis
D101. Aim of counter PSYOPS. The aim of counter PSYOPS is to counter or exploit the
effects of adversary propaganda or psychological activities. Counter PSYOPS are
directed at approved target audiences that are affected by the adversary
propaganda, less our own forces and citizents, who are the responsibility of troop
information and PI.
D102. Definition. Actions designed to detect and counteract adversary psychological
activities.
D103. Analysis of adversarys psychological activities. Analysis of an adversarys
psychological activity involves the detailed examination of the source, content,
audience, media and effects (SCAME) of his messages to obtain intelligence that
supplements the conventional forms of intelligence. The audience and the effects
can be unintended as well as intended. The primary purpose of the analysis of an
adversarys psychological activity is to collect PSYOPS-related intelligence
information. This is in order to evaluate its effect on own troops as well as on
friendly and uncommitted civilian audiences within the AOR, in order to be able to
eliminate or diminish the negative consequences, and to exploit any contradiction in
that adversary psychological activity. The analysis also involves a systematic study
of foreign mass communications intended for domestic and/or international
audiences.
D104. Source analysis. Identifies the individual, organisation or government that
sponsors and disseminates a particular item of an adversary psychological activity.
The three components of source analysis are: actor, authority and author. Sources
are further subdivided into:
a.
White. An acknowledged source.
b.
Grey. An unacknowledged source.
c.
Black. Originates from a source other than the one that is claimed.
D105. Content analysis. Involves the analysis and evaluation of an adversarys

psychological activity statements to determine the source's motives and objectives:
a.
Intended reaction on target audience.

D-1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
Adversary psychological activity technique.
c.
Factual information.
d.
The cultural significance of images and words used.
e.
Correlation to previous material. Look for inconsistencies.
f.
Content of message. Look for involuntary information.
g.
Quality of output.
D106. Audience analysis. Is a study of the total audience that the adversarys
psychological activities reaches or seeks to reach. The four types of audience are.
a.
Apparent. Those who appear to be directly reached and addressed.
b.
Ultimate. Those targeted, directly or indirectly addressed.
c.
Intermediate. Those reached but not directly addressed nor presumably

targeted.
d.
Unintended. Those reached, but not addressed nor presumably targeted.
D107. Media analysis. Determines the adversarys media capabilities, presumed reason
for using a particular dissemination method, the media capabilities of the source
and the consistency of the adversarys psychological activities messages content.
Media analysis indicates:
a.
Adversary psychological activities objectives.
b.
Adversary media capabilities.
c.
The reason for the selection of the means of communications used by the
adversary.
D108. Effects analysis. Determines the overall results of the adversary psychological
activity material on the target audience, the specific effects of them, and the
reasons it was effective, partially effective or totally ineffective. The four general
types of evidence that help to determine adversary psychological activities
effectiveness are:
a.
Responsive action of audiences.
D-2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
b.
Participant reports.
c.
Observer commentaries.
d.
Indirect indicators.
D109. Analysis methods. The two broad methods of analysing an adversarys

psychological activities are:
a.
The subjective method. (Intuitive). Based upon background, experience

and judgement of the analyst. Advantages include limited support
requirements and high mobility, accessibility of the information, efficient use
of resources and flexibility. Disadvantages include difficulty in documenting
conclusions, greater analysis bias, less continuity of operations and
analytical limitations.
b.
The objective method. Systematically analyses the content over a period of

time through the use of systematic reports, classification systems and
statistical databases. Advantages include quantity and variety of data
accessible, analytical capabilities to include accuracy, and an
institutionalised (error free) memory. Disadvantages include inefficiency of
mass storage, tendency to automate human judgements, computer skill
requirements, delayed access to data and output, and the need to anticipate
informational requirements.
Section II Techniques
D110. Possible techniques. The following is a palette of techniques, which have been
used successfully in the past. But it must be underlined that whether these can be
used individually or in combination depends on the outcome of careful analysis. An
analysis which, apart from the above mentioned, also includes factual information
about the audience, their general perceptibility and their attitudes towards the
adversary as well as towards own political and military initiatives.
a.
Direct refutation. Point by point rebuttal of the adversary message. The

aim is to completely discredit the message and, by implication, other
messages originating from the same source. The disadvantage of this
technique is that it requires the adversary's message to be repeated in full,
which re-advertises it.
b.
Indirect refutation. The refutation here is by introducing a new line of

argument which will, to the audience, dispose of the adversary's allegation.
The audience must be led to make the connection itself.
D-3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
c.
Forestalling. Beating the adversary to the punch. Announcing our reverses

before the adversary announces their victory.
d.
Diversion. Direct audience's attention away from the issues being raised.
e.
Initiative deception. The deliberate distortion of the adversary

psychological activities. His own themes and symbols are turned against
him.
f.
Minimisation. Reduce the importance of an issue and dismiss it as trivial.
g.
Immunisation. Insulate people from outside influences. Pre-conditioning or

indoctrination ensures that the audience will automatically dismiss messages
from a particular source.
h.
Silence. By saying nothing it may blow over and soon be forgotten.
i.
Restrictive measures. Deny the target audience access to an adversarys

psychological activity.
j.
Rumour control. Counter with education of population and delivery of

timely information and data to population.
Section III - Procedures

D111. PSYOPS COAs in countering adversarys psychological activities. Based on
the analysis and evaluation of possible techniques in countering adversary
psychological activities the PSYOPS staff element proposes possible COAs to the
commander concerning counter PSYOPS or other efforts to reduce or exploit the
effects. The chosen COA may be carried out by PSYOPS forces or by other
means. When required, particular counter PSYOPS measures should be taken by
NATO and/or TCNs at the Strategic level, and coordinated by the NAC in order to
support the operational commander.
D112. Limitations. NATO PSYOPS forces and assets may be used to provide the
commander with an analysis of an adversary psychological activity; however, they
will not have the responsibility for directly addressing NATO forces and citizens.
D-4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS
Attitude: Enduring systems of judgements, emotions and action tendencies, which predispose an individual to behave in certain ways to achieve particular objectives or goals.
Area of operations (AOO): A geographical area defined by the JFC commander within
his area of responsibility in which a commander designated by him is delegated authority
to conduct operations. (AJP-01).
Basic intelligence: Intelligence, on any subject, which may be used as reference material
for planning and as a basis for processing subsequent information or intelligence. (AAP-6).
Behaviour: The actions or reactions of persons in response to external or internal stimuli.
Civil military cooperation (CIMIC): The co-ordination and cooperation, in support of the
mission, between the NATO Commander and civil actors, including national population
and local authorities, as well as international, national and non-governmental organisations
and agencies. (AAP-6).
Combat psychological operations (CPO): Planned psychological operations conducted
against approved target audiences in support of the commander as an integral part of
combat operations and designed to defeat the enemy by reducing or eliminating the will to
continue aggression in the joint operations area, as well as support the operational
freedom of the commander. (MC 402).
Counter PSYOPS: Actions designed to detect and counteract hostile psychological
activities. (MC 402).
Crisis response psychological operations (CRPO): Planned psychological operations
conducted as an integral part of crisis response operations, designed to create a
supportive atmosphere and a willingness to co-operate among the parties in conflict and
civilians and civilian population in the joint operations area, in order to assist in the
achievement of mission objectives and protect the force. (MC 402).
Effectiveness (of target audience): The ability of a target audience to effect the desired
reaction or behaviour in themselves or others in response to a psychological activity or
PSYOPS message. (MC 402).
Glossary - 1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Framework nation: A nation accepting the primary responsibility for completing the tasks
assigned to a multi-national headquarters groups and/or units. For PSYOPS, the term
framework nation is applicable when describing PSYOPS forces that are part of the crisis
establishment (CE) of the CJTF/AOO-level headquarters. In this context, the term
framework nation is used to describe a nation that takes on responsibility for providing
the commander and core staff of the CJFPOCC, CJPOTF, or PSE. However, because the
PSYOPS activity is part of the CJTF/AOO-level HQ CE, funding for PSYOPS equipment,
product production, dissemination, and logistical support is a NATO responsibility.
Information operations (INFO OPS): INFO OPS are coordinated and synchronised
actions to create desired effects on the will, understanding and capability of adversaries,
potential adversaries and other NAC approved parties in support of the Alliance overall
objectives by affecting their information, information-based processes and systems while
exploiting and protecting one's own. (MC 422/2, Final, dated 24 oct 05)).
Lead nation: A nation accepting the responsibility for planning and controlling the
deployment, transportation for sustainment (re-supply) and redeployment as well as for
obtaining transportation resources for multi-national headquarters groups and/or units.
(MC 336) For PSYOPS, in any planned or proposed operation in which PSYOPS is part of
the statement of requirements (SOR) of the CJTF, the SC should request one nation to act
as the PSYOPS Lead Nation for the CJFPOCC or CJPOTF. The PSYOPS lead nation
takes on the responsibility for providing the bulk of the PSYOPS personnel for the CJTF
(with any agreements for other nations to contribute to the PSYOPS element at this level is
the responsibility of the lead nation), providing the PSYOPS communications, product
development, production and dissemination assets, as well as responsibility for procuring
and providing the necessary PSYOPS logistical support. Compensation and/or
reimbursement will be subject to agreements between the parties involved.
Limitations: Items specified by the commander that limit the scope of planning.
a.
Restraints: prohibited activities.
b.
Constraints: specific obligations that must be met.
(NATO BI-SC Guidelines for operational planning)

Measure of effectiveness (MOE): Measurements or indicators regarding how a
PSYOPS objective is accomplished. These measurements or indicators are normally
expressed as an increase or decrease in a specified activity of a target audience. MOEs
help in describing and portraying the effectiveness of PSYOPS efforts. (MC 402).
Glossary - 2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Propaganda: Any information, ideas, doctrines, or special appeals disseminated to
influence the opinion, emotions, attitudes, or behaviour of any specified group in order to
benefit the sponsor either directly or indirectly. Propaganda source identification is distinct
from determining the truthfulness of a propaganda product or activity: (AAP-6).
a.
White. An accurately acknowledged source. The actual sponsor correctly

advertises production or sponsorship.
b.
Grey. An unacknowledged source. It is not clear which individual,

organisation or government is claiming production or sponsorship
responsibility.
c.
Black. Falsely advertised source. The product or activity was actually

produced by a different individual, organisation or government than that
claimed.
Psychological endstate: A concise description in paragraph 3 of the PSYOPS annex L

outlining the emotional, attitudinal, and behavioural state the target audiences should be in
at the conclusion of a mission or phase. The Psychological endstate is linked to the
supported commanders endstate and the overall mission requirements.
Psychological media: The media, technical or non-technical, which establish any kind of
communication with a target audience. (AAP-6).
Psychological objective: A statement of a measurable response that reflects the desired
attitude or behaviour change of a selected target audience as a result of psychological
operations:
a.
Initial PSYOPS objectives: The objectives formulated during stage 2 of the

operational planning process (ORIENTATION). Initial objectives are not
fixed and can be modified while the overall operational plan is in the drafting
process.
b.
Final PSYOPS objectives: The objectives approved by the North Atlantic

Council (NAC) as part of the overall approval of the strategic commanders
operational plan for an assigned mission. Once these objectives are
approved, only the NAC can grant changes or modifications.
Psychological operations (PSYOPS): Planned psychological activities using methods of

communications and other means directed to approved audiences in order to influence
perceptions, attitudes and behaviour, affecting the achievement of political and military
objectives. (MC 402).
Psychological operations approach: The technique adopted to induce a desired
reaction on the part of the target audience. (AAP-6).
Glossary - 3
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
Psychological operations situation: That part of the overall operation situation in which
PSYOPS taken at command and unit level, as well as the commitment of PSYOPS units,
are planned and executed. (AAP-6).
Psychological situation: The current emotional state, mental disposition or other
behavioural motivation of a target audience, basically founded on its national, political,
social, economic, and psychological peculiarities but also subject to the influence of
circumstances and events. (AAP-6).
Psychological theme: An idea or topic on which a psychological operation is based.
(AAP-6).
Public information (PI): Information that is released or published for the primary purpose
of keeping the public fully informed, thereby gaining their understanding and support.
(AAP-6).
Receptivity: The vulnerability of a target audience to particular psychological operations
media. (AAP-6).
Reach-back : Reach-back is a mechanism where supplies and services held in the home
base can be accessed and used by deployed forces. For PSYOPS, it often refers to
electronic connectivity with PSYOPS elements left at in home stations that provide
PSYOPS in the CJTF/AOO support with regard to research and analysis, product
development and production.
Strategic psychological operations (SPO): Planned psychological operations that
pursue objectives to gain the support and cooperation of supportive and neutral audiences
and to reduce the will and the capacity of hostile or potentially hostile audiences to commit
aggressive action and contribute to crisis management and deterrence in support of
diplomatic actions. (MC 402).
Susceptibility: The anticipated acceptance or rejection of a target audience to a particular
psychological operations approach. (AAP-6).
Target audience: An individual or group selected for influence or attack by means of
psychological operations. (AAP-6).
a.
Apparent. Those who appear to be targeted by a PSYOPS product or

activity. May not be the actual target audience for the product, merely a
conduit.
b.
Ultimate. Those targeted, directly, or indirectly, by a PSYOPS product or

activity. Those that the PSYOPS practitioner wants to reach.
Glossary - 4
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
c.
Intermediate. Those reached but not directly addressed nor presumably

targeted. Clearly used as conduit for the Ultimate target audience.
d.
Unintended. Those reached, but not addressed nor targeted by the

PSYOPS practitioner.
Troop information: Information disseminated for the primary purpose of keeping own
forces informed.
Vulnerability. An analysis of the weaknesses a particular target audience may have to
psychological operations. Does not assume susceptibility to a particular psychological
approach.
Glossary - 5
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Glossary - 6
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
A5O
ACT
AAP
ACTORD
ACTREQ
ACTWARN
AJOD
AJP
AJF
AOO
AOR
BDA
BPA
A5O
ACT
ACTORD
ACTREQ
ACTWARN
AJF
AJOD
AJP
AOO
AOR
BDA
C2
C4
CA
CCIR
CE
CIMIC
CIS
CJFPOCC
CJPOTF
CJSOR
CJTF
COA
CONOPS
CPO
CRO
CRPO
Article 5 operations
Allied Command Transformation
Allied administrative publication
Activation order
Activation request
Activation warning
Allied joint doctrine
Allied joint publication
Allied joint force
Area of operations
Area of responsibility
Battle damage assessment
Battlefield psychological activities
Article 5 operations
Allied Command Transformation
Activation order
Activation request
Activation warning
Allied joint force
Allied joint doctrine
Allied joint publication
Area of operations
Area of responsibility
Battle damage assessment
Command and control
Command, control, communicaton and computers
Combat assessment
Commanders critical information requirement
Crisis establishment
Civil-military cooperation
Communications information systems
Combined joint force psychological operations component
command
Combined joint psychological operations task force
Combined joint statement of requirements
Combined joint task force
Course of action
Concept of operations
Combat psychological operations
Crisis response operations
Crisis response psychological operations
Abbreviations - 1
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
CSA
DJTF
EU
FORCEPREP
HN
HQ
IMA
Info Op(s)
IO
IOCB
JFC
JOA
JSB
KTA
MC
MCJSB
MOE
NAC
NATO
NCRS
NGO
NMA
OPCON
OPLAN
OPP
OPSEC
PDC
PI
PPP
PRB
PSE
PSYOPS
SC
SOP
SOR
SPO
SUPLAN
TA
TCN
TOA
TPT
TV
WG
Current situation assessment

Deployable joint task force
European Union
Force preparation
Host nation
Headquarters
International Military Staff
Information operations
International organization
Information operations coordination board
Joint force commander
Joint operations area
Jont Standardization Board
Key task accomplishment
Military Committee
Military Committee Joint Standardization Board
Measure of effectiveness
North Atlantic Council
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NATO Crisis Response System
Nongovernmental organization
National military authority
Operational control
Operation plan
Operational planning process
Operations security
Product development centre
Public information
Presence, posture, and profile
Product review board
Psychological operations support element
Psychological operations
Strategic commander
Standing operating procedures
Statement of requirements
Strategic psychological operation
Supporting plan
Target audience
Troop contributing nation
Transfer of authority
Tactical psychological operations team
TELEVISION
Working group
Abbreviations - 2
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
MC Documents
MC 128
Policy Guidance for NATO Intelligence
MC 133
NATO Operational Planning System
MC 299
MC Guidance for Defence Planning
MC 317
NATO Force Structures for the Mid - 1990s and Beyond
MC 324
The NATO Military Command Structure
MC 327
NATO Military Planning For Peace Support Operations
MA 327
Military Concept for NATO Peace Support Operations
MC 328
NATOs Military Co-operation Guidance
MC 336
NATO Principles and Policies for Host Nation Support
MC 343
NATO Military Assistance to International Disaster Relief Operations
MC 362
Use of Force (Rules of Engagement)(Draft)
MC 389
Directive for Implementation of the Alliance Combined Joint Task Force
Concept
MC 400
Military Implementation of the Alliances Strategic Concept
MC 402
NATO Psychological Operations Policy
MC 411
NATO Civil-Military Co-operation Policy
MC 422
NATO Information Operations Policy
MC 437
NATO Special Operations Policy
MC 457
NATO Policy on Public Information
Allied Publications
AAP-6
NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions
AAP-15
NATO Glossary of Abbreviations
AJP-1
Allied Joint Doctrine
AJP-2
Allied Joint Intelligence, Counter-Intelligence and Security Doctrine
AJP-3
Allied Joint Operations (Draft)
AJP-3.4
Non-Article 5 Crisis Response Operations (Ratification draft)
AJP-3.4.1
Peace Support Operations
AJP-3.10
Information Operations (Draft)
AJP-5
Operations Planning
AJP-9
Civil-Military Cooperation
Bi-SC Publications
Bi-MNC
Directive 80-1 for Psychological Operations
Bi-MNC
Directive for NATO Doctrine for Peace Support Operations
Bi-SC
Guidelines for Operational Planning (GOP)
Bi-SC
Functional Planning Guide PSYOPS, dated 13 Jan 2003
ORIGINAL
AJP-3.10.1(A)
ORIGINAL

Nato Psyops Doctrine

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nato Psyops Doctrine

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nato Psyops Doctrine

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NATO/PfP UNCLASSIFIED

ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR

ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR

RESERVED FOR NATIONAL LETTER OF PROMULGATION

RECORD OF NATIONAL RESERVATIONS

RECORD OF RESERVATIONS BY NATIONS

RECORD OF RESERVATIONS & COMMENTS

Chapter 1 - An Overview of psychological operations

Chapter 2 - Organisational responsibility for PSYOPS

Chapter 3 - Command and Control of PSYOPS

Chapter 4 - PSYOPS and the Range of Military Operations

Psychological Operations Planning

Media for PSYOPS Use

Attitudes and Behaviour

Section I Section II Section III Section IV -

The motivation of the individual

Annex D - Counter PSYOPS Techniques and Procedures

List of Effective pages

Section II The Global information environment

Weaken the will of the adversary or potentially adversary target audiences.

Reinforce the commitment of friendly target audiences.

Gain the support and cooperation of uncommitted or undecided audiences.

Section IV Categories of PSYOPS

Strategic psychological operations (SPO)

Definition: Planned psychological operations that pursue objectives

Description: SPO are high level (i.e. national government level)

Crisis response psychological operations (CRPO)

Combat psychological operations (CPO)

Research and evaluation. PSYOPS themes, activities and symbols should

Understanding. Fundamental to the effect of PSYOPS is the ability of

Early integration and coordination. PSYOPS activities must be fully

Timeliness. Rapid exploitation of PSYOPS themes is often critical, thus

Truthfulness. All missions must be based on true information. The use of

Acknowledgment of the source. NATO PSYOPS activities acknowledge

Credibility. Credibility in the minds of the TA is a matter of perception. The

0111. Support requirements for PSYOPS.

Intelligence and information. Intelligence support for military PSYOPS

Command, control, communications, and computers (C4). Military C4

Logistics. Support of combined, joint PSYOPS places unique additional

Section VI - Counter PSYOPS

Section VII Psychological operations relationships with other military activities.

Within the new construct of INFO OPS, a decision-makers effectiveness is a

PSYOPS influences attitudes, perceptions and behaviour and can affect a

Liaison with civil actors at the appropriate level.

Carry out continuous assessments of the local civil environment, including

Oversee the conduct of civil-related activities by military forces, including the

Work towards a timely and smooth transition of civil responsibilities to the

Work with other staff branches on all aspects of operations.

Advise the commander on all of the above.

PSYOPS, or their assets, should be used directly to gain support of civilians

0117. Related processes, capabilities and functional areas

Strategic processes. There are a number of related processes and areas

Intelligence. Intelligence policy is given in MC 128 and articulated in

Operational planning. NATO Policy for the conduct of operational planning

Targeting and assessment. PSYOPS analysis contributes as an integral

To approve and maintain an effective PSYOPS policy, and ensure that

To provide guidance for the conduct of PSYOPS to include operations,

To develop and promulgate NATO PSYOPS doctrine through the Military

To encourage cooperation and co-ordination of all military PSYOPS matters