202E03
202E03
202E03
Required:
Which would be more appropriate in each of the following
situations -- job-order costing or process costing?
Job Order
a. A custom yacht builder
Process
X
X
e. A plywood manufacturer
f. A soft-drink bottler
g. A film studio
l. A fertilizer factory
Exercise 3-6 Schedules of Cost of Goods Manufactured and Cost of Goods Sold
Given:
Parmitan Corporation has provided the following data concerning last month's manufacturing
operations.
Purchases of raw materials
Indirect materials included in manufacturing overhead
Direct labor
Manufacturing overhead applied to work in process
Underapplied overhead
$53,000
8,000
62,000
41,000
8,000
Beginning
$24,000
41,000
86,000
Ending
$6,000
38,000
93,000
Required:
1. Prepare a schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured Schedule
Parmitan Corporation
Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
For the month just completed
Direct materials used:
Raw materials inventory, beginning
Add: Purchases of raw materials
Raw materials available for use
Less: Raw materials inventory, ending
Raw materials used in production
Less: Indirect materials used
Direct Material Used
Direct labor incurred:
Manufacturing overhead applied
Total manufacturing costs added this period
Beginning work-in-process
Total work in process
Less: Work in process inventory, ending
Cost of goods manufactured
$24,000
53,000
$77,000
(6,000)
$71,000
8,000
$63,000
62,000
41,000
$166,000
41,000
$207,000
38,000
$169,000
$86,000
169,000
$255,000
93,000
$162,000
8,000
$170,000
a.
b.
Manufacturing Overhead
380,000
410,000
Bal.
30,000
d.
100,000
The overhead that had been applied to production during the year is distributed among the
ending balances in the accounts as follow:
Work in Process, ending
Finished Goods, ending
Cost of Goods Sold
$32,800
41,000
336,200
$410,000
For example, of the $80,000 ending balance in WIP, $32,800 was overhead that had been
applied during the year.
Required:
1. Identify the reasons for entries (a) through (d).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
To record the actual MOH incurred during the current time period.
To record applied MOH assigned to production during the current time period.
To record cost of goods manufactured for the current time period.
To record the cost of goods sold for the current time period.
2. Assume that the company closes any balance in the MOH directly to COGS.
Prepare the necessary journal entry.
Debit
Manufacturing Overhead
30,000
Cost of Goods Sold
To close the Manufacturing Overhead Account
Credit
30,000
3. Assume instead that the company allocates any balance in the MOH account to the
other accounts in proportion to the overhead applied during the year that is in the
ending balance in each account. Prepare the necessary journal entry, with
supporting computations.
Debit
Credit
Manufacturing Overhead
30,000
Work in Process Inventory
2,400
Finished Goods Inventory
3,000
Cost of Goods Sold
24,600
To close the Manufacturing Overhead Account
Direct Materials
Direct Labor
Manufacturing Overhead
Total Manufacturing Costs
Number of units to be produced
Estimated unit product cost
First
$240,000
96,000
228,000
$564,000
80,000
$7.05
Quarter
Second
Third
$120,000
$60,000
48,000
24,000
204,000
192,000
$372,000 $276,000
40,000
$9.30
20,000
$13.80
Fourth
$180,000
72,000
?
?
60,000
?
Management finds the variation in quarterly unit product costs to be confusing and
difficult to work with. It has been suggested that the problem lies with manufacturing
overhead, since it is the largest element of total manufacturing cost. Accordingly,
you have been asked to find a more appropriate way of assigning manufacturing
overhead cost to units of product.
Required:
1. Using the high-low method, estimate the fixed manufacturing overhead cost per
quarter and the variable manufacturing overhead cost per unit. Create a cost
formula to estimate the total manufacturing overhead cost for the fourth quarter.
Compute the total manufacturing cost and unit product cost for the fourth quarter.
Manufacturing
Dollars
High Values
Low Values
Change in Costs
Variable MOH cost per unit
Fixed MOH cost per quarter
Cost Formula for 4th Q MOH:
Units
$228,000
192,000
$36,000
80,000
20,000
60,000
$180,000
$180,000
$0.60
Direct Materials
Direct Labor
Manufacturing Overhead
Total Manufacturing Costs
Fourth
$180,000
72,000
216,000
$468,000
60,000
$7.80
$216,000
$3.00
$1.20
$4.20
$8.40
200,000
2. What is causing the estimated unit product cost to fluctuate from one quarter
to the next?
The fixed portion of the MOH cost is causing the unit product costs to fluctuate.
The unit product cost increases as the level of production decreases because
fixed overhead is being spread over fewer units.
3. How would you recommend stabilizing the company's unit product cost?
Support your answer with computations that adapt the cost formula you
created in requirement 1.
The unit product cost can be stabilized by using a predetermined overhead
rate that is based on expected activity for the entire year (200,000 units).
200,000
The cost formula created in requirement 1 can be adapted to compute the
annual predetermined overhead rate as follows:
Fixed cost for the year can be estimated as 4 times the quarterly
high-low fixed cost value of $180,000 or $720,000.
The variable portion would still be $.60 per unit produced.
Therefore the cost formula would be: $720,000 + $.60(units produced)
Since the yearly production is expected to be 200,000 the estimated MOH
cost is expected cost is $720,000 + ($.60 X 200,000) or $720,000 + $120,000
or $840,000. Thus, the stable yearly predetermined mfg. overhead would be
$840,000/200,000 = $4.20 per unit produced.
$4.20
Stabilized Total Mfg. Costs
Direct Materials
Direct Labor
Total Mfg. Overhead Costs
Total Mfg. Costs Per Unit
* VMOH Per Unit
FMOH Per Unit
Total Mfg. Overhead Costs
Unit Costs
$3.00
1.20
4.20 *
$8.40
$0.60
3.60
$4.20
See Q3
Manufacturing overhead
Direct labor
Cutting
$540,000
$300,000
Department
Machining
Assembly
$800,000
$100,000
$200,000
$400,000
Total Plant
$1,440,000
$900,000
Jobs require varying amounts of work in the three departments. The Hastings job, for
example, would have required manufacturing costs in the three departments as follows:
Direct materials
Direct labor
Manufacturing overhead
Cutting
$12,000
$6,500
?
Department
Machining
Assembly
$900
$5,600
$1,700
$13,000
?
?
Total Plant
$18,500
$21,200
?
The company uses a plantwide overhead rate to apply manufacturing overhead costs
to jobs.
Required:
1. Assuming the use of a plantwide rate:
a. Calculate the MOH rate for the current year
Predetermined MOH Rate = Estimated TMOH $/ Estimated total amount of the allocation base
Predetermined MOH Rate = $1,440,000 / $900,000 =
$1.60
160%
b. Determine the amount of MOH $ that would have been applied to the Hastings job.
Applied MOH = MOH Rate X Actual use of the allocation based used to the determine rate
Applied MOH = $1.60 X $21,200 =
$33,920
2. Suppose that instead of using a plantwide overhead rate, the company had used a
separate predetermined overhead rate in each department. Under these conditions:
a. Compute the MOH rate for each department for the current year.
Predetermined MOH Rate = Estimated TMOH $/ Estimated total amount of the allocation base
Manufacturing overhead
Direct labor cost
MOH Rate per DL $
MOH Rate as a % of DL $
Cutting
$540,000
$300,000
1.80
180%
Department
Machining
Assembly
$800,000
$100,000
$200,000
$400,000
4.00
0.25
400%
25%
Total Plant
$1,440,000
$900,000
1.60
160%
b. Determine the amount of MOH cost that would have been applied to the Hastings job.
Direct materials
Direct labor
Manufacturing overhead
Cutting
$12,000
$6,500
$11,700
Department
Machining
Assembly
$900
$5,600
$1,700
$13,000
$6,800
$3,250
Total Plant
$18,500
$21,200
$21,750
3. Explain the difference between the MOH that would have been applied to the Hastings
job using the plantwide rate in question 1 (b) above and using the departmental rates
in question 2 (b).
The bulk of the labor cost on the Hastings job is in the Assembly Department, which incurs
very little overhead cost. The department has an overhead rate of only 25% of direct labor
cost as compared to much higher rates in the other two departments.
As indicated above, use of departmental MOH overhead rates results in a much smaller
amount of overhead cost charged to the Hastings job than if a plantwide rate is used.
The use of a plantwide overhead rate redistributes MOH costs proportionally between the
three departments (at the rate of 160% of DL costs) and results in a larger amount of MOH
cost being charged to the Hastings job, as shown in Part 1. Use of the plantwide MOH rate
may help explain why the company bid too high and lost the job.
If a plantwide MOH rate is being used, the company will tend to charge too little MOH cost
to jobs that require a large amount of labor in the Cutting or Machining Departments. The
reason is that the plantwide overhead rate (160%) is much lower than the rates if these
departments were considered separately (180% and 400%).
4. Assume that it is customary in the industry to bid jobs at 150% of total manufacturing
cost (direct materials, direct labor, and applied MOH). What was the company's bid
price on the Hastings job? What would the bid price have been if departmental MOH
rates had been used to apply MOH costs?
Direct materials
Direct labor
Manufacturing overhead
Total Manufacturing Costs
Customary markup 50%
Cutting
$12,000
6,500
10,400
$28,900
Department
Machining
Assembly
$900
$5,600
1,700
13,000
2,720
20,800
$5,320
$39,400
Total Plant
$18,500
21,200
33,920
$73,620
36,810
$110,430
Department
Machining
Assembly
$900
$5,600
1,700
13,000
6,800
3,250
$9,400
$21,850
Cutting
Direct materials
$12,000
Direct labor
6,500
Manufacturing overhead
11,700
Total Manufacturing Costs
$30,200
Customary markup 50%
Bid price on Hastings job (TMC X 1.50)
Total Plant
$18,500
21,200
21,750
$61,450
30,725
$92,175
$18,255
5. At the end of the year, the company assembled the following actual cost data relating
to all jobs worked on during the year:
Actual manufacturing costs
Direct materials
Direct labor
Manufacturing overhead
Total Manufacturing Costs
Cutting
$760,000
320,000
560,000
$1,640,000
Department
Machining Assembly
$90,000
$410,000
210,000
340,000
830,000
92,000
$1,130,000
$842,000
Total Plant
$1,260,000
870,000
1,482,000
$3,612,000
Cutting
$560,000
512,000
$48,000
Department
Machining Assembly Total Plant
$830,000
$92,000 $1,482,000
336,000
544,000
1,392,000
$494,000 ($452,000)
$90,000
Department
Cutting
Machining Assembly
$560,000
$830,000
$92,000
576,000
840,000
85,000
($16,000)
($10,000)
$7,000
Check
($16,000)
Check
($10,000)
Check
$7,000
Total Plant
$1,482,000
1,501,000
($19,000)
Check
($19,000)
$110,430.0
1.7034483
AMOH Rate
Check
$90,000
Predetermined rate
Estimated studio overhead cost
Estimated hours of studio services
Predetermined overhead rate
Studio time used on Slug Fest job
Applied overhead to Slug Fest job
2010
2011
$90,000
1,000
$90
30
$2,700
$90,000
750
$120
30
$3,600
2010
2011
900
600
$90
$120
$81,000
$72,000
90,000
90,000
($9,000) ($18,000)
2. The president of Skid Road Recording has heard that some companies in the industry have
changed to a system of computing the predetermined overhead rate at the beginning of each
year based on the estimated studio overhead for the year and the hours of studio service that
could be provided at capacity. He would like to know what effect this method would have on
job costs. How much overhead would have been applied using this method to the Slug Fest
job if it had been done in 2010? In 2011? By how much will overhead have been underapplied
or overapplied in 2010 using this method? In 2011?
Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated studio overhead cost / Capacity hours of studio services
Predetermined rate
Estimated studio overhead cost
Capacity hours of studio services
Predetermined overhead rate
Studio time used on Slug Fest job
Applied overhead to Slug Fest job
2010
2011
$90,000
1,800
$50
30
$1,500
$90,000
1,800
$50
30
$1,500
2010
2011
900
600
$50
$50
$45,000
$30,000
90,000
90,000
($45,000) ($60,000)
3. How would you interpret the underapplied or overapplied overhead that results from using studio
hours at capacity to compute the predetermined overhead rate?
Actual
$243,000
$150,000
$1.62
The following transactions took place during the year (all purchases and services were
acquired on account):
a. Raw materials purchased
$142,000
b. Raw materials requisitioned for use in production (all DM)
$150,000
c. Utility bills incurred in the factory
$21,000
$21,000
d. Costs for salaries and wages were incurred as follows:
Direct labor
Indirect labor
Selling and Administrative Salaries
e. Maintenance costs incurred in the factory
f. Advertising costs incurred
g. Depreciation recorded for the year
90% relates to factory assets
10% relates to Selling & Administrative
h. Rental cost incurred on buildings
80% is factory related
20% is selling & administrative related
i. Misc. selling & administrative costs
j. Manufacturing overhead cost applied to jobs
k. Cost of goods manufactured for the year
l. Sales for the year on account
Cost of goods sold (from job cost sheets)
$216,000
$90,000
$145,000
$15,000
$130,000
$50,000
$45,000
$5,000
$90,000
$15,000
$45,000
$90,000
$72,000
$18,000
$72,000
$17,000
?
$590,000
$1,000,000
$600,000
$243,000
Actual MOH
$18,000
$24,000
$35,000
Required:
Debit
Credit
142,000
142,000
Advertising Expense
Accounts Payable
To record advertising expense incurred
150,000
150,000
21,000
21,000
216,000
90,000
145,000
451,000
15,000
15,000
130,000
130,000
g. Manufacturing Overhead
Depreciation Expense, Selling & Administrative
Accumulated Depreciation, Selling & Administrative
Accumulated Depreciation, Factory
To record depreciation
45,000
5,000
h. Manufacturing Overhead
Rental Expense
Accounts Payable
To record cost of rent
72,000
18,000
i.
17,000
j.
5,000
45,000
90,000
17,000
240,000
240,000
590,000
590,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
600,000
600,000
3,000
3,000
Accounts Receivable
BB
??
l.
1,000,000
Manufacturing Overhead
BB
0
c.
21,000
d.
90,000
e.
15,000
g.
45,000
h.
72,000
243,000 j.
240,000
B
3,000
m.
3,000
EB
0
BB
a.
c.
e.
f.
h.
i.
Accounts Payable
??
142,000
21,000
15,000
130,000
90,000
17,000
415,000
BB
l.
Sales
0
1,000,000
BB
l.
m.
BB
f.
Advertising Expense
0
130,000
Rental Expense
0
18,000
BB
h.
$18,000
142,000
$160,000
10,000
$150,000
216,000
240,000
$606,000
24,000
$630,000
40,000
$590,000
$35,000
590,000
$625,000
(25,000)
$600,000
3,000
$603,000
$1,000,000
603,000
$397,000
$145,000
130,000
5,000
18,000
17,000
315,000
$82,000
6. Job 218 was one of the many jobs started and completed during the
year. The job required $3,600 in DMs and 400 hours of DL time at a
rate of $11 per hour. If the job contained 500 units and the company
billed at 75% above the unit product cost on the job cost sheet, what
price per unit would have been charged to the customer?
Cost assigned to Job 218:
Direct materials
Direct labor
Applied manufacturing overhead ($1.60/DM$)
Total manufacturing costs
Add: Markup based on 75% of TMC
Anticipated sales billings for Job 218
Divided by units produced
Price Per Unit Produced
$3,600
4,400
5,760
$13,760
10,320
$24,080
500
$48.16
5,760
$150,000
216,000
240,000
$606,000
24,000
$630,000
$40,000 ??
$590,000
Actual MOH
Applied MOH
Underapplied
To COGS
Closed
$243,000 Dr.
240,000 Cr.
$3,000 Dr. Balance in MOH Account
3,000 Cr. MOH; Dr. COGS
$0 Balance
40
5
$24
$36
$960
180
$1,140
2. Suppose in another week that Lynn works 50 hours but is idle for 4 hours during the
week due to equipment breakdowns. Compute Lynn's total wages for the week. How
much of this amount would be allocated to direct labor cost? To manufacturing
overhead?
Hours
Rate
Total
Direct labor costs
46
$24
$1,104
$1,104
MOH idle time
4
$24
96
MOH overtime premium
10
$12
120
Total MOH
216
$1,320
$1,320
Regular Pay
Overtime Pay
40
10
$24
$36
$960
360
$1,320
3. Southern Laboratories has an attractive package of fringe benefits that costs the
company $8 for each hour of employee time (either regular time or overtime).
During a particular week Lynn works 48 hours but is idle for 3 hours due to
material shortages. Compute Lynn's total wages and fringe benefits for the week.
If the company treats all fringe benefits as part of manufacturing overhead cost,
how much of Lynn's wages and fringe benefits for the week would be allocated
to direct labor cost? To manufacturing costs?
Hours
45
3
8
48
Rate
$24
$24
$12
$8
Total
$1,080
$72
$96
384
$1,080
Total MOH
$1,632
Regular pay
Overtime pay
40
8
$32
$44
$552
$1,632
$1,280
352
$1,632
4. Refer to the data in (3) above. If the company treats that part of fringe benefits
relating to direct labor as added direct labor cost, how much of Lynn's wages and
fringe benefits for the week will be allocated to direct labor cost? To MOH cost?
Hours
45
3
3
8
Rate
$32
$24
$8
$12
Total
$1,440
$72
24
$96
$1,632
Regular pay
Overtime pay
40
8
$32
$44
$1,280
352
$1,632
$1,440
$192
$1,632