Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development
development
Meaning
Sustainable development is an approach to economic planning that attempts to foster economic
growth while preserving the quality of the environment for future generations. Despite its enormous
popularity in the last two decades of the 20th century, the concept of sustainable development proved
difficult to apply in many cases, primarily because the results of long-term sustainability analyses
depend on the particular resources focused upon. For example, a forest that will provide a sustained
yield of timber in perpetuity may not support native bird populations, and a mineral deposit that will
eventually be exhausted may nevertheless support more or less sustainable communities. Sustainability
was the focus of the 1992 Earth Summit and later was central to a multitude of environmental studies.
The principle of sustainable development emphasises on two basic needs, firstly, need for socioeconomic development and secondly, need of limitation imposed on the environment's capability to cope
with the present and future requirements.
Explaining the inter-dependence of conservation and sustainable development, the Brundtland Report
(1997) said:
Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their, own needs. Sustainable development requires meeting the
basic needs of all and extending to all opportunity to satisfy their aspirations for a better life.
The principle of sustainable development seeks to achieve the following three basic objectives:
(1) to maintain production of goods and services for development and efficiency;
(2) conversation and management of neutral resources including preservation of bio-diversity and
maintenance of biological integrity;
(3) maintenance and enhancement of the quality of life adopting the principle of equitable distribution
of wealth and material resources.
These objective may respectively be called as economic, environmental and social objectives of the
principle of sustainable development.
From the environmental point of view, the objective of the principle of sustainable development centres
round three issues, namely, (i) to maintain essential ecological processes, (ii) to preserve genetic
diversity; and (iii) to secure sustainable utilization of species and ecosystems.
1
means.
The Supreme Court applying the principle of careful use and conservation of natural resources,
observed in the case of A. Jagannath v. Union of India, that activities of the industries violative of this
principle and of, environmental legislations must be discouraged.
In Indian Handicrafts Emporium v. Union of India, the indigenous ivory or ivory articles were
prohibited from being exported as it impugned Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and was also against
the moral claims embodied under 48-A of the and principle of conservation of natural resources.
3. Environmental Protection
Environmental protection is an integral part of sustainable development. Most of the nations have
enacted environmental protection laws to ensure sustainable development within their territories. In
order to reinforce sustainable development, an effective environmental protection mechanism is needed.
It is generally seen that inadequate protection of environment or its degradation affects the poorest
sections of the society most as they draw a large part of their livelihood from unmarked environmental
resources such as forests, water from hand pumps, air polluted and noisy slum dwellings etc. The
problem of environmental protection generally emanates from water resources, forests, agriculture,
industry, energy and power etc., therefore, policy decisions in these sectors should be environmental
oriented and well planned so as to ensure that there is no degradation in the natural environment.
So far India is concerned, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 is the central legislation. Besides,
there are some other pollution control and prevention laws and States have also framed their own antipollution laws according to their local requirements. The ultimate object is to ensure sustainable
development for protection of environment from being degraded or polluted.
4. Precautionary Principle :The precautionary principle seeks to ensure that a substance or human
activity which may cause a threat to the environment is prevented from causing harm to environment,
even if there is no conclusive scientific proof of linking that particular substance or human activity to
environmental damage. Thus, precautionary principle pre-supposes that onus of proof is on the
industrialist to show that his action is benign, that is not harmful to environment.
The precautionary principle in the context of environmental protection is essentially about the
management of scientific risk. It is a component of the concept of ecologically sustainable development
and has been defined in Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration, 1992. According to this principle, where
there is threat of serious or irreversible environmental damage, lack of full scientific certainty should
not be used as a reason for postponing measures to prevent environmental degradation." In other words,
any human activity or behaviour which bears the harmful effect to the environment, has got to
prevented at all costs.
It may be stated that prior to the precautionary principle as incorporated in Principle 15 of the RioDeclaration, 1992, Principle 6 of the Stockholm Declaration, 1972 relating to the Assimilative Capacity
Principle was the governing rule which provided as under :The discharge of toxic substances or of substances and the release of heat, in such quantities or
concentrations as to exceed the capacity of the environment to render them harmless, must be halted in
4
order to ensure that serious irreversible damage is not inflicted upon ecosystem. The just struggle of the
peoples of all countries against pollution should be supported.
Thus, the assimilative capacity principle assumed that science could provide policy-makers the
information and means necessary to avoid encroaching upon the capacity of the environment to
assimilate impacts and it is presumed that relevant technical expertise would be available when
environmental harm was predicted and there would be sufficient time to act in order to avoid such
harm.
The precautionary principle has received legal recognition in almost all the international instruments
and has now become an integral part of the United Nations Environmental Programme.
The European Community has adopted the principle in the Bergen Declaration on Sustainable
Development, 1990 and reiterated that environment related actions should predict, prevent and
suppress environmentally harmful factors.
Beginning with Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, the
Supreme Court explicitly recognised the precautionary principle as a principle of Indian environmental
law in a number of subsequent cases. Justice Kuldeep Singh of the Supreme Court in Vellore Citizens
case laid down the following rules with regard to precautionary principle :(1) The State Governments and local authorities are supposed to anticipate and then prevent the cause of
environmental degradation. They are supposed to check the activity which is damaging for
environment;
(2) Merely because there is a lack of scientific knowledge as to whether a particular activity is causing
degradation, it should not stand in the way of the Government;
(3) The onus of proof is on the actor (i.e. person who does the activity) or the developer/industrialist to
show that the action was environmentally friendly.
In order to achieve the above, the following precautions are supposed to be taken:
(i) The decision should be based on best possible scientific information and analysis of risk;
(ii) Where there is uncertainty but potentially serious list exists, even then precautionary measures are
supposed to be taken;
(iii) Ecological impacts should be given paramount consideration, more so when resources are nonrenewable or where the result is irreversible;
(iv) The indication of the cost should be made known directly to the person who if does not take
precaution, can be called upon to meet the expense a subject which may fall under the head polluter
pays Ii principle.
In Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, the Apex Court explained that when there is a state
of uncertainty due to lack of data or material about the extent of damage or pollution likely to be
caused, then in order to maintain ecological balance, the burden of proof that the said balance will be
maintained, must necessarily be on the industry or the unit which is likely to cause pollution.
5. Polluter Pays Principle
5
All the member countries participating in the Organisation For Economic Co-operation and
Development (O.E.C.D.) agreed to incorporate in their environmental policies the principle of 'polluter
pays' so as to discourage subsidies that could be detrimental for trade. They deemed this necessary for
the protection of environment and save the country from threats posed by environmental pollution in
modernised industrial societies. Polluter Pays principle was considered to be one of the best method
for prevention of environmental pollution. But there were practical difficulties in working out an exact
definition of the principle as there could be dispute as to the limits on payment for damages caused and
exact scope of the applicability of principle.
Despite these difficulties, the European Community in its Action Programme on Environment had
accepted the polluter pays principle as a part of its strategy on environmental matters. The principle
Was incorporated in 130 R (2) of the action programme which reads as follows :(i) Preventive action is always preferable to remedial action;
(ii) Environmental damage should be rectified at source;
(iii) The polluter should pay the costs of the measures taken to protect and preserve the environment;
(iv) environmental policies should be a component of the European Communitys other policies.
Finally, the polluter pays principle was recognised as an integral part of the sustainable development
by the international community arid was incorporated as Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration of Earth
Summit, 1992. The principle reads as follows :Principle 16 National authorities should endeavour to promote the internationalisation of
environmental costs and the use of economic instruments taking into account the approach that the
polluter should in principle bear the cost of pollution with due regard to the public interest and without
distorting international trade and investment.
As a matter of fact, this principle was already accepted and included as Principle 4 of the Stockholm
Declaration in 1972 but it was legally and internationally recognised as a substantive principle of
environmental law under Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration, 1992.
The Supreme Court in , observed that polluter pays principle has been recognised as fundamental
objective of Government's environmental policy to prevent and control pollution. The Court in this case
observed that the calculation of environmental damages should not be on the basis of claim put forward
by the party, but it should be on the basis of examination of the situation by the Court, keeping in view
the factors such as deterrent nature of the award.
In Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, the Supreme Court directed the Central
Government to constitute an authority under Section 3 (3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
and confer on this authority all the powers necessary to deal with the situation created by tanneries and
other polluting industries in the State of Tamil Nadu. The authority so constituted shall implement the
precautionary principle and the Polluter Pays Principle.
6. Principle of Liability to help and Co-operate This principle has been specifically incorporated in RioDeclaration (1992) as Principle 9 which provides that the States should co-operate to strengthen
6
land has been converted into plain for construction of industries, complexes and other commercial
purposes. Besides, seven lakh hectare land has turned into desert and gallons of polluted water is being
flowed in rivers, lakes and seas causing irreparable damage to environment and ecosystem.
In view of this destruction of forests, the Government is failing in its duties as trustee of this valuable
natural resource and causing damage to its beneficiaries i.e., the peop1e could not exploit it for their
own use, what to talk of leaving it for use by future generations'! Even now, it is not too late and there is
need on the part of the State to protect and preserve the valuable natural resources as a trustee and
people to cooperate with the administration to protect environment from being degraded.
Conclusion
It is true that in order to improve and protect the environment from pollution sustainability must be
there between environment and development. The concept of sustainable development based on the
notion that natural resources should be exploited for the benefit of both present and future generation.
As we know that increased industrial activity worldwide requires the use of natural resources which are
depleting day by day. It is also true that the need for resource conservation, efficient use of resources
and environment friendly corporate policies and behaviour has now been recognised worldwide. The
country needs an Environmental policy and planning, while being globally sensitive must be based on
local needs. Finally, if sustainable development has to move from mere wishful thinking and sloganmongering into a reality, the world (developed and developing) as a whole has to move towards a new
world order in which new economic and technological orders are dovetailed. Such an order has to be
aimed at benefiting the poor because in the chain of sustainable development, the weakest links are
poverty and inequality. Last but not least, if the principles of sustainable development are followed then
definitely with the economic growth and industrial development of a country environment protection
can be maintained.
Project report
on
Sustainable
Development
Presented to:
Presented
by:
Prof. Sabina
Nishant Sharma
8th sem 199/11
Environmental law
UILS
Acknowledgement
I would like to express profound gratitude to my teacher Ms.Sabina Salim for her
invaluable support , encouragement, supervision and useful suggestion throughout this
project work.
Her moral support and continous teaching enabled me to complete my work successful.
Last but not the least . I am thankful and indebted to all those who0 helped me directly
and indirectly in completion of this project .
10
Bibliography
Books referred:
1. Paras Diwan Environmental Administration Law and Judicial Attitude
2. V.N. Paranjape Environmental Law
3. Agarwal, S: Legal Control of Environmental Pollution
Electronic sources:
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_development
2. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/765435/environmental-law/224618/Sustainabledevelopment
11
Table of contents
Topics
page no.
12