Takemitsu, Toru - Piano Music
Takemitsu, Toru - Piano Music
Takemitsu, Toru - Piano Music
hansen
The music of Toru Takemitsu is often stated to be essentially Japanese. However, previous
studies on Takemitsu tend to highlight the composers reception of Japanese aesthetics and
philosophy rather than his preoccupation with Japans various musical traditions. This study
traces the influence of these traditions in a particular segment of Takemitsus oeuvre, namely,
the piano works. Analyses of selected pieces from this repertoire will show how tradition and
innovation (the provenance of which is not always apparent) have merged into Takemitsus
highly distinctive musical language.
_
The author would like to thank Ryu Cipris for proofreading the manuscript and Prof. Keisuke Takayasu (Ehime
University) for sharing his insight into the history of Japanese music.
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 97
97
07-06-2010 14:50:01
For an account of alternative classifications of Takemitsus oeuvre in Japanese scholarship, see Burt (2001:
1-2).
Heifetz (1984) provides a list of neo-nationalist works with Japanese instruments: one piece composed in
1958, one in 1962, four in 1963, one in 1964, three in 1965, four in 1966, five in 1967, and one in 1970.
98
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 98
07-06-2010 14:50:01
39-40) also enriched For Away (1973), at least according to some theorists.3 Les Yeux
Clos (1979) also belongs to this period.
Expressive period (1982-1992): In the last period represented by Rain Tree Sketch
(1982), Les Yeux Clos II (1989) and Rain Tree Sketch II (1992), Takemitsu preferred
melodic expressiveness over an avant-garde idiom, which led to a style with modal
references, fewer sharp contrasts, more homogenous forms and longer, horizontally
extended phrases.
Previous Research
Most of the studies that discuss the reception of traditional Japanese music in contemporary
music focus exclusively on historical issues (e.g. Dan 1961; Koizumi 1961; Heifetz 1984)
or on abstract aesthetic concepts (e.g. Tamba 1976; Lee 1991; Narazaki 2002) rather than
on concrete characteristics of contemporary compositional technique. Ohtakes book
(1993), for instance, is a monograph on Takemitsu and dedicates a complete chapter to
the piano works, but is, nevertheless, chiefly concerned with aesthetics. The same holds
true for Chung-Haing Lees doctoral dissertation. His investigation of how Takemitsu
so skillfully infuses his Western-oriented piano compositions with traditional and
aesthetic Japanese elements is limited to philosophical influences like Zen Buddhism and
Japanese arts (Lee 1991: 2). Lees self-proclaimed focus on aesthetic issues leads him to
characterize Takemitsus piano music as merely Eastern aesthetics [subjected] to Western
compositional techniques (57), being unique in that it so often expresses a Japanese
spirit without obviously utilizing Japanese musical material (2). This conception might
be representative of the three particular pieces Lee addressed in his dissertation (Piano
Distance, For Away and Pause Ininterrompue), but not necessarily of Takemitsus piano
music in general.
Takemitsu, too, hardly discussed his compositional method throughout his numerous
writings (Burt 2001: 2-3). This silence is typical of many of Takemitsus contemporaries
who criticized their predecessors for having employed traditional music for nationalistic
purposes. For this generation, Japaneseness did not reside so much in melodies, rhythmic
patterns, or instrumental sounds drawn from traditional Japanese music, but rather in a
certain mind-set. Therefore, if Takemitsu referred to Japanese elements in his work, he
usually limited his commentary to its aesthetic and formal dimensions (e.g., strolling
through a Japanese garden) rather than on its pitch or rhythmic material.4 Many scholars
and commentators have followed Takemitsus example, and, in Shuhei Hosokawas words
(2003: 506), especially Japanese authors, while quoting from his introspective essays and
intuitive interviews, tend to interpret Takemitsu according to his words rather than his
score.
Although successful score-oriented analyses of Takemitsus music have been carried
out, the majority of these do not pay specific attention to the piano works. For instance,
Herd (1989) primarily dealt with the neo-nationalist school of the early post-war years
before Takemitsu adopted a key position in Japanese musical life, and Watanabes study
(1992) of traditional elements in Western-style piano works by Japanese composers
only referred to Takemitsu briefly. Burts monograph (2001) on Takemitsu is unique
by providing the first analytical overview of Takemitsus complete oeuvre in English,
but though references to traditional music occur sporadically, its focus seems biased
towards Western influences. Similarly, other score-oriented studies have concentrated on
influences from Debussy and Messiaen (Koozin 1993; 2002), American jazz theory (Burt
This seems dubious. The trip was only in November/December 1973, the year in which For Away was
published (Takemitsu 1974: 72).
4 An exception is his discussion of A Flock Descends into a Pentagonal Garden and Garden Rain in a 1984 lecture
titled Dream and Number (Takemitsu 1995: 97-126).
3
99
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 99
07-06-2010 14:50:02
2002a), and dodecaphony (Burt 2002b). On the other hand, Nuss (2002) and Everett
(2005) studied court music influences on Takemitsu, but focused on ensemble pieces, as it
is the case with Smaldones analysis (1989) of large-scale pitch organization in November
Steps (1967) and Autumn (1973).
By focusing on Takemitsus piano repertoire, including youthful pieces prior to the
1960s as well as later pieces from the 1980s and 1990s, I aim at refining the conclusions
provided by Lee (1991) and others, and making an attempt towards further generalization.
In my analysis I will include excerpts from Les Yeux Clos II, Rain Tree Sketch I and II,
Romance for Piano and Litany, which were not addressed by Lee and, when appropriate
and necessary, provide supplement for earlier analyses. Moreover, I will focus on the direct
impact of traditional Japanese musics on Takemitsus compositional technique, and only
refer to the aesthetic dimension and the composers own writings when this is directly
relevant to technical details.
In shomyo, Buddhist liturgical chant imported from China, most pieces are performed in free time (jokyoku).
However, some have fixed meter (teikyoku) or combine fixed meter with free time (gukyoku) (Kishibe et
al. 2009: 4). Folk music pieces with uncountable metrical structure belong to the so-called oiwake style
_
(Watanabe 1992), and especially rural folksongs (minyo) for solo performance are in free rhythm (Kishibe et
al. 2009: 7). Also solo music for shakuhachi employs free rhythm (Kishibe et al. 2009: 3). In gagaku, especially
_
netori and choshi movements (i.e. preludes) employ jo-byoshi, free rhythm (ibid.). These are referred to as
_
jo movements, but also elsewhere tempo varies rather freely. In no theatre, non-metered sections are called
_
hyoshi awazu (Komoda/Nogawa 2002: 571). Additionally, metered and free rhythms sometimes coexist, and
_
in bunraku the tayu (narrator) and the shamisen player come together to produce an extraordinary wavering
time in which they are neither together nor apart (Takemitsu 1987: 12).
100
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 100
07-06-2010 14:50:02
Example 1
Les Yeux Clos II, 8/2-3/all.6
From Les Yeux Clos II onwards, Takemitsu applied two graphic signs for accelerando and
decelerando. Whereas signs for dynamics had already existed for ages, composers had only
recently started developing graphic signs for gradual tempo fluctuation.7 This extension
of notational practice suggests a wish to notate metrical and rhythmic subtleties.8
Modes and melody
As is the case for gagaku, the elegant ensemble music of the Imperial Court, and the
musical instruments used in this genre,9 the Japanese tuning system and modes were
adopted from mainland China and subsequently altered to accommodate Japanese
practice and aesthetics (Komoda/Nogawa 2002: 566). Below I will suggest possible
connections between Takemitsu and the modal practice of traditional musics.
Takemitsus piano pieces seem to show a general preference for the melodic intervals
of fourths and seconds (Hansen 2007: 18). Similarly, another Japanese composer, Hikaru
Hayashi, once admitted to favoring melodies employing those intervals because they
remind him of traditional music (Herd 1989: 132). In China and subsequently Japan,
6 Throughout this article the numbers inserted into x/x/x refer to page/system/bar in the score.
7 For instance, ascending and descending arrows indicated accelerando and decelerando in Pierre Boulez
Structure - deuxime livre (1961) and Brian Ferneyhoughs Cassandras Dream Song (1970), and two graphic
systems for notating gradual movement between tempo levels were developed by Karlheinz Stockhausen
in his Klavierstck VI (1955) and by Krzysztof Penderecki in his Strophen (1959) and Anaklasis (1959-60).
However, to my knowledge, the signs used by Takemitsu were not common among his contemporaries.
8 Another way of avoiding metrical organization is the artificial meter in Piano Distance where each bar is
three seconds long. This is a compromise between Takemitsus goal of metrically free performance and the
need for precise notation.
_
9 Gagaku was imported from China in the eighth century AD. Among the instruments employed are ryuteki
_
(transverse bamboo flute), hichiriki (double reed pipe), sho (mouth organ), biwa (4-string short-necked lute),
koto (13-string long zither), and taiko (large drum).
101
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 101
07-06-2010 14:50:04
102
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 102
07-06-2010 14:50:04
Example 2
Les Yeux Clos II, 5/ 2/2.
Example 3
Quasi-mirror scale in Rain Tree Sketch, 5/3/1 5/4/1.
(
1
103
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 103
07-06-2010 14:50:05
Melodic motifs
Another pitch characteristic of Takemitsus piano works, I argue, is his use of melodic
motifs, which is possibly related to the trichordal structure of traditional Japanese music.
A similar argument has been made by Timothy Koozin, who conducted set-theoretical
analyses of piano works (Koozin 1989; 1991) and three late pieces (Koozin 2002). Koozin
(1991: 134) specifically stresses the prominence of pitch-class sets [014] and [026].
Moreover, Smaldone (1989) found [014] and [015] both on the surface level and on
deeper structural levels in the two orchestral pieces November Steps and Autumn, and he
convincingly related this pitch organization to the nuclear tones that Burnett (1989) had
discovered in a traditional shamisen piece (long-necked lute). Importantly, in all examples
given below, the tri- or tetrachordal structure only governs single melodic motifs whereas
other textural elements in the musical context apply distinctively different sets.
In 1958, Koizumi Fumio proposed a theory of modes based on the unit of a
perfect fourth instead of an octave (Komoda/Nogawa 2002: 568-570) to describe pitch
organization in traditional Japanese music. This theory has been dominant ever since.
Koizumis modes are_ constructed from conjunct and/or disjunct combinations of the
four trichords minyo (e.g. C-Eb -F), ritsu (e.g. C-D-F), miyakobushi (e.g. C-Db -F), and
okinawa (e.g. C-E-F), each with_ an ambitus of a fourth and a distinctive intermediary
note. Generally speaking, minyo was used for folksongs and traditional children songs,
ritsu for court music, miyakobushi for art music of the Edo Period, and okinawa mostly
on the Ryukyu Islands. However, in actual practice the four types are combined also
simultaneously in different instruments (Koizumi 1961: 185-186).14
In Rain Tree Sketch the motif F5-F#5-F5-E5-C#5 (including transposed entries starting
This [0125] tetrachord corresponds with a
from Ab 4 and Bb 5) is melodically prominent.
_
superimposed combination of the minyo and okinawa trichords, which is consistent with
the earlier mentioned tendency to combine trichords in actual practice. Another variation
of Smaldones [015] trichord is the motif F4-F4-G4-C5-G4-F4-Db 4 (alternatively starting
from Bb 3, Eb 3 and incompletely from Db 4), which is a [0157] tetrachord corresponding
to a conjunct combination of the miyakobushi with an incomplete version of the ritsu
trichord (C, Db , F + F, G).15
In Les Yeux Clos, F5-G5-B5 (alternatively starting from F# 4, C5, C# 4, Gb 4, C4 and
inversely from C4, B3, and D4) is the main motif whereas, in its sequel Les Yeux Clos II, B3C# 4-G (alternatively starting from C4, A3, and Bb 3) plays a similar role. Interestingly, both
motives represent the [026] trichord, the motif from Les Yeux Clos II being a permutation
of its predecessor (Koozin 1991). Like the [015] trichord (containing the semitone
interval), which figures prominently in November Steps and Autumn (Smaldone 1989), the
use of [026] (containing the tritone interval) implies a characteristic which distinguishes
Japanese from Chinese music (cf. in mode). At the same time, though, it reminds of the
octatonic scale from Takemitsus early piano works. As I will demonstrate below through
an analysis of Romance for Piano and For Away, this confluence of the modal system of
traditional Japanese music on the one hand and of innovative scales favored by earlytwentieth-century Western composers like Debussy, Ravel, and Stravinsky on the other, is
characteristic of Takemitsus compositional technique.
14 For instance, opening the holes on shakuhachi one by one results in a disjunct combination of two minyo
_
trichords (e.g. D-F-G-A-C-D) whereas the common koto tuning hirajo shi adheres to two disjunct miyakobushi
_
trichords (corresponding to the descending in mode), and the kokinjo shi tuning combines miyakobushi and
_
minyo disjunctively (corresponding to ascending in) (Dean 1985: 151-153).
15 In For Away (8/3/all) the miyakobushi trichord (i.e. Smaldones [015]) appears in the repeated four-note motif
C-D -F-D .
104
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 104
07-06-2010 14:50:05
Nuclear pitches
A key trait of Japanese music is the prominence given to nuclear pitches through repetition
and constant presence. In the biwa parts in gagaku, for instance, only the uppermost,
melodic voice is altered while the pitches of the underlying open strings remain the same
throughout a piece (Example 4). In Les Yeux Clos II this gagaku texture is turned upside
down with the stable part maintained in the top voices while notes in the middle and bass
registers change continuously (Example 2).
Example 4
_
Beginning of senshuraku movement from the togaku repertoire. Transcribed by Robert Garfias,
Music of a Thousand Autumns: The Togaku Style of Japanese Court Music (Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1975), p. 247.
3
Fue
( )
Hichikiri
( )
Sho
Koto
Biwa
3
Shoko
Kakko
Taiko
( )
105
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 105
07-06-2010 14:50:06
Example 5
Nuclear pitches in Romance for Piano (1948).
Another example of nuclear pitch structure is Romance for Piano. Analysis of the bass
reveals D and A as the most predominant pitches (Example 5). The presence of two nuclear
pitches refers to a typical koto tuning used in traditional ensemble music. In the chamber
composition Zangetsu, for instance, the G (PNP = primary nuclear pitch) and D (SNP =
secondary nuclear pitch) both have neighbor notes a whole tone below and a semitone
above resulting in a six-note scale where Bb is absent: F, G (PNP), Ab , C, D (SNP), Eb (Burnett
1989: 86). Likewise, in Romance for Piano, D can be heard as PNP and A as SNP.
Besides PNP and SNP, the neighbor pitches C, Eb and G occur. Note, in this context,
that the upper neighbor of SNP (Bb ) is not used as a bass note. The double neighbor note
circling around D only supports the notion of this pitch as the primary one at least
initially. F is absent as a bass note and only appears once in the other voices in passing to
G (m. 14), which is also consistent with koto tuning. The modulation to SNP (m. 21), too,
is supported by transposition of the initial descending fourth motif.
At the climax (m. 46), for the first and only time, G# is used as a bass note. The tense
tritone interval to PNP adds an element of ambiguity to the mode. This ambiguity
is maintained in the subsequent section (mm. 56-67) where a conflict between PNP
and SNP arises, and even in the final bar SNP attempts to question Ds role as PNP.
Conforming well with Japanese music, where some pieces end in another mode than
the initial one (Burnett 1989: 84), this formal distribution almost resembling a
reverse sonata movement is in strong opposition to Western musical form. In sum,
the modal disposition of Romance for Piano is highly comparable to koto tuning and
Burnetts rendering of the in-sempo mode where D is PNP, A is SNP, and secondary
notes appear one whole note below and a semitone above each of them.
In For Away, which is probably the composition that most extensively applies the
concept of nuclear pitches, the sustained note in the initial passage (C5) is also surrounded
by the adjacent neighbor notes Bb 4 and Db 5 (cf. Lee 1991: 21-25; 36-41). However, due to
repetition, Bb 4 quickly becomes the nuclear pitch together with E4, thus emphasizing the
tritone interval. The situation where several notes act as variations of a single pitch area is
comparable
with the pitch-bending technique embai used on hichiriki (double reed pipe)
_
and ryuteki (transverse bamboo flute) calling for widening of the pitch spectrum of notes
in gagaku melodies (Nuss 2002: 96).
As a whole, For Away could be understood as a tripartite ABA form (Example 6). The
initial part A spans from 1/1/1 to 4/1/1 and could be further subdivided into a (from the
beginning) with the nuclear pitches E/Bb and b (from 2/2/2 and onwards) focusing on
F # /C. The middle part B spans from 4/1/2 to 8/1/1 with the further subdivisions c with
the nuclear pitches G/Ab and d (from 6/1/2 and onwards) focusing on Eb /F# /C. In d the
pitches Bb , A and Ab interfere alternately with the three nuclear pitches, which might
be interpreted as an unstable element in this development section. The recapitulation
A from 8/1/2 subsequently combines the two pairs of nuclear pitches used in a and b.
Once again, in this nuclear-pitch structure, one encounters Takemitsus preference for the
106
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 106
07-06-2010 14:50:07
Example 6
Central notes in For Away (1973). Numbers refer to [page, system, bar].
1,1,1
2,2,2
4,1,2
6,1,2
+
8,1,2
8,2,1
'
A
b
8,3,1
8,4,1
9,2,2
9,3,2
tritone at the expense of fourths and fifths. As noted by Koozin (1989), the nuclear pitches
(except for Ab ) all belong to the octatonic scale. Takemitsu may have made a synthesis
of traditional Japanese nuclear pitches and octatonic elements adopted from Western
composers.
Texture
One of the most distinctive features of Takemitsus piano music is its texture. Actually,
quite a few references to traditional Japanese instruments emerge from his piano pieces.
The following excerpt could for instance be interpreted as referring to the deepest version
of the taiko drum the dadaiko _(low D1) a plucked string instrument like koto or biwa
(middle part) and the shrill sho (top chords) from the gagaku ensemble (Example 7).
Below I will delve further into each of these.
Example 7
Rain Tree Sketch II, 5/4/1-3.
Deep, single notes played with soft dynamics occur frequently in Takemitsus piano
music. Often they fill out breaks in one hand (Example 2), and sometimes they support
a crescendo (Example 7, 10). Finally, such notes are frequently applied in phrase_ endings
(Example 2), corresponding to the usual role of the dadaiko in gagaku and no theatre
(Komoda/Nagawa 2002: 572).
Koto and biwa play the most prominent pitches of gagaku melodies in the top notes
while underlying arpeggios are added by plucked lower strings (Example 4). Similar
textures are an unmistakable part of Takemitsus piano music occurring in all stylistic
periods (Examples 1, 8). In Example 8, note the striking similarity with the koto part from
Example 4. Such chords are always played in ascending arpeggio, usually combined with
107
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 107
07-06-2010 14:50:09
decreasing dynamics. This possibly reflects the fact that higher strings produce_ a different
sound than deep strings. Incorporating decrescendo is also known from no where the
taiko accompaniment tends to decrease in dynamics towards cadences (Malm 1960). This
is in opposition to much Western music preferring pre-cadential crescendo.
Example 8
Rain Tree Sketch, 6/3/1-3.
108
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 108
07-06-2010 14:50:09
Example 9
Rain Tree Sketch II, 6/1/all.
Hence, clusters are omnipresent in every stylistic period of Takemitsus piano music, and
it certainly made a difference to him which notes were included. Although Takemitsus
non-functional clusters might, at least on a conceptual level, originate in the Japanese
aitake, their pitch structure seems to represent his own invention, or to be inspired by
Western composers.
Another characteristic of Takemitsus piano music is his frequent use of unison
passages. These are usually combined with a diminuendo and end on a fermata. Often
they are transitional passages of 1-4 bars indicating beginnings of new formal sections
within larger compositions (e.g. Romance for Piano, Les Yeux Clos I and II, Piano Distance,
Rain Tree Sketch II, and the first movement of Litany). In cases where individual voices
in unison or complex textures do not follow each other precisely, heterophony tends
to arise. Example 9, for instance, evokes a heterophonic image rather than a polyphonic
one, due to stretto imitation. By contrast, traditional Japanese music is not harmonically
founded as Western music (Dan 1961: 207). Alternatively, melodies in heterophony are
prominent in e.g. gagaku (fue and hichiriki in Example 4), koto-accompanied songs,
and chamber music of the Edo Period (Burnett 1975). Example 9, for instance, bears a
strong resemblance to the imitation technique found in many introductory movements
in gagaku where the distance between individual parts is similarly short.
In Takemitsus music, dynamic indications become an independent mode of
expression resulting in multidimensional textures in which individual voices emerge
alternately. In the culmination of Rain Tree Sketch II (Example 10), as many as four
textural elements demonstrate separate dynamic disposition (see also Examples 7, 9).
Takemitsus multidimensional textures are comparable to the non-vertical organization
of traditional Japanese music, which manifests itself in heterophony, but also leads to
individuality regarding dynamic disposition of simultaneous phrases. Though not
exclusively Japanese, the tendency for great variety but little coalescence is a key trait
distinguishing gagaku not only from most Western orchestral music, but also from
many other East and South East Asian ensembles such as the Indonesian gamelan and
Chinese theatre orchestras (Malm 1990: 124). By contrast, in tonal music of the West,
dynamic fluctuations are mostly used for elucidating or alternatively discouraging
the inherent tendencies of the harmonies. Therefore, in much Western piano music,
both hands follow a shared dynamic development.
The wealth of dynamic detail in Takemitsus piano works is enormous. For instance,
no less than sixteen dynamic nuances are given in Les Yeux Clos, ranging from molto ppp to
ff. Takemitsus application of parentheses and poco to provide further distinction might
reflect the tendency towards dynamic subtleties found in traditional Japanese music. As
regards accents, Takemitsu distinguishes between poco sf, sf, sff, sfz, sffz, mfz, and in Rain
109
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 109
07-06-2010 14:50:10
Example 10
Rain Tree Sketch II, 7/1/1-2.
Tree Sketch , > and V designate strong, moderate, and weak accents, respectively. Finally,
as the performance notes for Les Yeux Clos read: [the m]ost important thing is to
produce subtle changes of the color and the time as floating. That is, the overall dynamic
span might not be particularly wide in Japanese music; however, the ear is accustomed to
extremely subtle differentiation (Dean 1985: 161).
Aesthetics
In Japanese language and epistemology, an unwritten rule goes that less is more. The key
role of simplicity in Japanese aesthetics similarly appears in various art forms: the brevity
of haiku poems, the completeness of a single stroke in calligraphy, the sparse number
of ingredients in gastronomy, and the minimalistic furnishing. Speaking of his own
compositions, Takemitsu once stated: I want to make one sound that is as powerful as
silence (Takemitsu 1995: 52). Takemitsus urge to obtain maximum amount of expression
with minimum amount of material is considered a basic
concept in most Japanese music
_
principle (Buddha in one
by Malm (1990: 123), arguably related to the Ichi-on jo-Butsu
_
sound), which has been attributed to the itinerant komuso monks of the Fuke sect playing
solo shakuhachi as an instrument of meditation (Miki 2008: 4).
Besides the unison textures, simplicity is similarly reflected in the pointillism of Takemitsus
second stylistic period. In Piano Distance and Pause Ininterrompue, sounds are usually supplied
with individual dynamics and performance indications. Lee (1991: 21) ascribes Takemitsus
pointillistic style to traditional shakuhachi playing. However, the influence from Webern is
likely to be stronger than that from traditional music in the works from the pre-1966 period.
Expressing oneself in a few words, there is always a risk that ambiguity will arise. Such
vagueness is characteristic of Japanese philosophy and is similarly traceable in the history
of musical notation in Japan. As was the case in Europe prior to the development of print,
110
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 110
07-06-2010 14:50:11
notation was not intended to fix the melodic patterns precisely, but served primarily
as an auxiliary mnemonic device for carriers of the tradition (Komoda/Nogawa 2002:
573). Consequently, until the launch of the Meiji governments modernization program,
a common practice was never promoted, and an abundance of repertoire-, guild-, and
instrument-specific notational styles developed (573-583).
Though adopting Western notation, Takemitsu also invented novel features and
explored graphic notation in Corona and Crossing (both from 1962). This was inspired by
Western avant-garde composers such as John Cage, many of whom, for their part, were
deeply inspired by Eastern aesthetics. Furthermore, the lack of meter and the prominence
of polyrhythm contribute to the ambiguity faced when performing Takemitsus music.
That is, influence runs in both directions, and one can only point to particularly striking
similarities and suggest certain possible connections, but not claim their existence in any
incontrovertible way.
In addition to simplicity, related concepts like emptiness or, more generally, absence,
play a prominent role in Japanese culture as well. The large, empty expanses in visual art
and the Buddhist striving towards self-transcendence (nirvana) bear witness to this. In
traditional music this manifests itself as silence, which exists independently from sound
in the concept of ma, the noun form of the preposition between. According to Takemitsu,
[s]ilence is the mother of the sounds (Beckman 1986: 4). The significance he ascribed to
silence is most strongly evident in later pieces such as Rain Tree Sketch and its sequel in
which empty bars are instrumental in creating a sketchy appearance with plenty of room
for pensiveness (Example 8). Interestingly, in such pieces, absolute silence is replaced by
reverberation representing a special kind of absence.
Takemitsus reverberation assumes various forms. I will therefore distinguish between
passive and active reverberation, the latter occurring in either abstract or concrete form.
Whereas actual notes are played in active reverberation, sounds are modified in other ways
in passive reverberation; for instance, by pressing the key silently to obtain fp-effects (For
Away, Piano Distance).18 In concrete, active reverberation, notes are repeated, often in
combination with softer dynamics or tempo fluctuation. More prevalent is abstract, active
reverberation where reverberation is not a carbon copy, but constitutes an abstract comment
to the preceding music (Example 1). This phenomenon is not unique to Takemitsus music;
it also characterizes,
for instance, Olivier Messiaens piano textures.
_
In no, the reverberant silence (yo-in) following the drum beat is considered superior
to the beat itself (Beckman 1986: 5). Likewise, ma designates the interval between sounds
and holds a crucial position (Ohtake 1993: 54-55). In contrast to its significance in
Japanese culture, emptiness is often associated with a certain fear in the West, sometimes
referred to as horror vacui, a term borrowed from Aristotelian physics and art criticism.
In this context emptiness easily assumes an existential dimension, unexpected silence is
awkward in social situations, and pauses in music are usually countable units entailing a
promise of continuation. Moreover, pauses serve merely to separate phrases in language
or music rather than achieving significance on their own. These implicitly assumed
boundaries between music and silence (and in addition, between sound and music) in
Western musical thought were the ones which the zen-inspired John Cage aimed to make
his Western audiences aware of when he called for a pianist to remain silent at the piano for
several minutes in his 433. Naming the random sounds surrounding the performance
an essential part of the performance, Cage insisted that his work not be conceived of as
pure silence, but rather as more or less aleatoric sounds concealed in, and divulging from,
silence.
18 Various pedal effects also relate to passive reverberation. Since, however, the relation to traditional music is
far from obvious, references to previous analysis will suffice here (Hansen 2007).
111
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 111
07-06-2010 14:50:11
In Piano Distance, Takemitsu refers to a certain kind of silence which is distinct from the
pensive reverberation in later pieces and might be related to the Western understanding
of absence and emptiness referred to above. More specifically, he writes a long fermata,
supported by the text be silent and an indication of no pedal. The subsequent,
suddenly occurring, dissonant sf-chord is an obvious release of accumulated energy.
This phenomenon is not unknown in Western practice. Also, the position of the fermata
in the approximate Golden Section (50/79 bars = 0,633) testifies to a stringent formal
construction which hints at Western pointillism and differs significantly from the sketchy
appearance of Takemitsus later pieces. On the other hand, the concept of ma_ draws
attention to precisely the accumulation and release of energy; for instance, in no silence
should be performed in a manner conveying the tension of what is to come. Inclusion of
later pieces thus clarifies that Takemitsus understanding of silence developed throughout
his career. However, both kinds of silence have precedents both in traditional Japanese
and in Western music.
Noise elements constitute a final influence from Japanese aesthetics on Takemitsus piano
music. The extended playing techniques called for in graphically notated pieces, clusters,
sfz-effects, and reverberation of silently played keys are all good examples of this. Moreover,
dissonant sonorities are added, possibly inspired by the embai technique. For instance,
Takemitsus use of parallel major sevenths is an extraordinarily expressive variation of the
unison.
In traditional Japanese music all sounds were eligible on equal terms since most music
originally served dramatic purposes (Miki 2008: 3). There were no inharmonic sounds,
and discord did not exist as a concept.19 Noise, like silence, became an indispensable part
of Japanese aesthetics and was deliberately added to instruments imported from mainland
China so that, for example, shakuhachi and biwa became much noisier than their Chinese
counterparts, xiao and pipa. Similarly, on the shamisen, noise sounds (sawari) produced
sympathetically by the lowest string are highly appreciated (Kishibe et al. 2009).
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the omnipresence of influences from traditional Japanese musics
in all five stylistic periods of Takemitsus compositional career. These include: various
strategies of escaping meter; trichordal organization of melodic motifs; avoided octave
equivalence; chromatically
descending leading notes; nuclear pitches; stable harmony
_
(koto, biwa, and sho chords); instrumental imitations; descending dynamics towards
phrase endings; cluster chords; unison passages; heterophony; imitation techniques from
gagaku; multidimensional dynamic texture; subtle dynamics; and aesthetic concepts such
as simplicity, ambiguity, silence, reverberation, and noise. Especially in later pieces, clearly
not all influences represent merely eastern aesthetics as suggested by Lee (1991: 57), but
some do indeed relate to technical details concerning Takemitsus compositional method.
Technical influences are more subtly present in early pointillistic works in which the
composer allegedly aimed at avoiding them.
Nevertheless, most of these characteristics also appear in twentieth-century music by
Western composers. Pointillism is known from Webern, reverberation is characteristic of
Messiaens piano textures, and Japanese music has no monopoly on clusters, noise sounds,
heterophonic elements, dynamic subtleties, silence, and specific melodic motifs either.
Moreover, these characteristics are not present simultaneously in a single composition,
and Takemitsu never adhered consistently to compositional rules, always refraining from
simply copying elements from Japanese music. Rather he created inventive syntheses
such as his chromatic aitake clusters and his prominent use of the tritone, replacing the
fourth of Japanese music, in melodic motifs and as interval between nuclear pitches. As
19 Takemitsu once claimed he did not believe in the existence of inharmonic sounds (Beckman 1986).
112
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 112
07-06-2010 14:50:11
mentioned, the tritone can be ascribed to both the octatonic scale of Western music and
the hemitonic, pentatonic scales of Japanese music.
Insofar the concept of influence is a sufficient concept at all to describe cultural
exchanges, these facts make it extremely difficult to distinguish between Japanese
influence, Western influence, and Takemitsus personal style. However, juxtaposition of
technical characteristics from several traditional genres in Takemitsus piano works is in
itself an important innovation departing from traditional practice where genres were
hardly mixed. Thus, it seems that Takemitsu did indeed fulfill his wish to develop as a
Japanese in tradition and as a Westerner in innovation.
References
Beckman, Jesper (1986). Jeg hber at kunne gribe noget udenfor min egen snvre horisont En
_
samtale med den japanske komponist Toru Takemitsu [interview with Takemitsu, 17 May 1986],
Dansk Musik Tidsskrift 61/1, 4-8.
_ _
Burnett, Henry (1989). Minezaki Kotos Zangetzu: An Analysis of a Traditional Japanese Chamber
Music Composition, Perspectives of New Music 27/2, 78-117.
_
Burt, Peter (2001). The Music of Toru Takemitsu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_______ (2002a). Takemitsu and the Lydian Chromatic Concept of George Russell, Contemporary
Music Review 21/4, 73-109.
_______ (2002b) Up the Garden Path: Takemitsu, Serialism, and the Limits of Analysis, in:
Ferranti/Narazaki, 155-176.
Dan Ikuma (1961). The influence of Japanese Traditional Music on the Development of Western
Music in Japan, Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan 3, 201-217.
_
_
De Ferranti, Hugh, and Yoko Narazaki, eds (2002). A Way a Lone: Writings on Toru Takemitsu. Tokyo:
Academia Music Ltd.
Dean, Britten (1985). That Howling Music: Japanese Hogaku in Contrast to Western Art Music,
Monumenta Nipponica 40/2, 147-162.
Everett, Yayoi Uno (2005). Mirrors of West and Mirrors of East: Elements of gagaku in PostWar Art Music, in: Hae-kyung Um (ed.), Diasporas and Interculturalism in Asian Performing Arts:
Translating Traditions. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Garfias, Robert (1975). Music of a Thousand Autumns: The Togaku Style of Japanese Court Music.
Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
_
Gill, Dominic (1974). Liner notes to Toru Takemitsu, Corona (London Version); For Away; Piano
Distance; Undisturbed Rest, performed by Roger Woodward. Decca HEAD 4.
_
Hansen, Niels Chr. (2007). Tilgange til en improvisationspraksis med udgangspunkt i Toru Takemitsus
klavermusik [in Danish], unpublished BA dissertation, Royal Academy of Music Aarhus.
_______ (2008). Different approaches to an improvisational practice based on the piano music of
_
Toru Takemitsu, Journal of Music and Meaning 6 <www.musicandmeaning.net>.
Heifetz, Robin J. (1984). East-West Synthesis in Japanese Composition: 1950-1970, The Journal of
Musicology 3/4, 443-455.
Herd, Judith Ann (1989). The Neonationalist Movement: Origins of Japanese Contemporary
Music, Perspectives of New Music 27/2, 118-163.
Kishibe Shigeo (1966). The Traditional Music of Japan. Tokyo: Kokusai Bunka Shinkokai [The Society
for International Relations].
_______ et al. (2009). Japan, in: Grove Music Online/Oxford Music Online.
Koizumi Fumio (1961). Contemporary Music in Occidental Style and Its Problems in Japan, in: The
preservation of traditional forms of the learned music of the orient and the occident, proceedings
congress 6-12 April 1961, International Music Council, 184-189.
_
Koozin, Timothy (1989). The Solo Piano Works of Toru Takemitsu: A Linear/Set-Theoretic Analysis,
Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
113
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 113
07-06-2010 14:50:11
_______ (1991). Octatonism in Recent Solo Piano Works of Toru Takemitsu, Perspectives of New
Music 29/1, 124-140.
_
_______ (1993). Spiritual-Temporal Imagery in Music of Olivier Messiaen and Toru Takemitsu,
Contemporary Music Review 7, 185-202.
_______ (2002). Traversing Distances: Pitch Organization, Gesture and Imagery in the Late Works
_
of Toru Takemitsu, Contemporary Music Review 21/4, 17-34.
Komoda Haruko and Nogawa Mihoko (2002). Theory and Notation in Japan, in: Robert C.
Provine, Yoshihiko Tokumaru, and J. Lawrence Witzleben (eds), The Garland Encyclopedia of
World Music: East Asia: China, Japan, and Korea, New York: Routledge.
_
Lee, Chung-Haing (1991). Japanese Elements in the Piano Works of Toru Takemitsu, doctoral
dissertation, University of North Texas.
_
Malm, William (1960). An Introduction to Taiko Drum Music in the Japanese No Drama,
Ethnomusicology 4/2, 75-78.
_______ (1990). Practical Approaches to Japanese Music, The Garland Library of Readings in
Ethnomusicology 2, 123-32.
_
Mayuzumi Toshiro (1964). Traditional Elements as a Creative Source for Composition, Journal of
the International Folk Music Council 16, 38-39.
Miki Minoru (2008). Composing for Japanese Instruments, transl. Marty Regan. Rochester: University
of Rochester Press.
_
Narazaki Yoko (2002). Japanese Elements Evident in Takemitsus Use of Atonality and Tone
Clusters, in: Ferranti/Narazaki, 74-82.
Nuss, Steven (2002). Takemitsu and the Cry of the Phoenix, in: Ferranti/ Narazaki, 83-124.
_
Ohtake, Noriko (1993). Creative Sources for the Music of Toru Takemitsu. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
_
_
Hosokawa Shuhei (2003). Review of The Music of Toru Takemitsu by Peter Burt, Toru Takemitsu: A
_
Bio-Bibliography by James Siddons, and A Way a Lone: Writings on Toru Takemitsu by Hugh de
_
Ferranti and Yoko Narazaki, Japanese Studies 29/2, 505-509.
Smaldone, Edward (1989). Japanese and Western Confluences in Large-Scale Pitch Organization of
_
Toru Takemitsus November Steps and Autumn, Perspectives of New Music 27/2, 216-231.
_
Takemitsu Toru (1974). Mirrors, Perspectives of New Music 30/1, 36-80.
_______ (1987). My Perception of Time in Traditional Japanese Music, Contemporary Music Review
1/2, 9-13.
_______ (1989). Contemporary Music in Japan, Perspectives of New Music 27/2, 198-204.
_______ (1995). Confronting Silence: Selected Writings, transl. and ed.Yoshiko Kakudo and Glenn
Glasow. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Fallen Leaf Press.
Tamba Akira (1976). Aesthetics in the Traditional Music of Japan, The World of Music 18/2, 3-10.
Watanabe Shuko (1992). Synthesis of Traditional Elements in Western-style Solo Piano Works
by Japanese Contemporary Composers, Music of Japan Today: Tradition and Innovation
Symposium I, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York, 28-29 March 1992.
114
TvM_15_#2_mei_2010_12.indd 114
07-06-2010 14:50:11