FEM Chapter 8
FEM Chapter 8
FEM Chapter 8
Chapter 8
Development of the Linear-Strain
Triangle Equations
v2 u3 v3 u4
v4 u5 v5 u6
v6
u ( x , y ) a1 a 2 x a 3 y a 4 x 2 a 5 x y a 6 y 2
v ( x , y ) a 7 a 8 x a 9 y a10 x a11 x y a12 y
2
u
{ }
v
x2
xy
y2
x2
xy
{ } [ M * ] {a}
y 2
a1
a 2
a12
In Matrix Form
u1 1 x1
u 6 1 x6
v1 0 0
v6 0 0
y1
x12
x1 y1
y12
y6
0
x62
0
x6 y 6
0
y62
0
0 0
1 x1
1 x6
0
y1
y6
0
x12
x62
0
x1 y1
x6 y 6
y1
x12
x1 y1
y12
y6
x62
x6 y 6
y 62
x1
y1
x12
x1 y1
x6
y6
x62
x6 y 6
a1
0 a6
y12 a7
2
y6 a12
0
y12
2
y 6
u1
u 6
v1
v6
{a} [ X ] 1 {d }
{ } [M * ][X ] 1{d }
[N ]{d }
u (x , y ) N 1
{ }
v (x , y ) 0
N2
N3
N4
N5
N6
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
N
u
i i
{ } i 61
N v
i
i
i 1
u1
v
1
0
0
N6
u 6
v 6
x x
v
{ } y
x
y
u v
y x
Since
u
{ }
v
x2
xy
y2
x2
xy
y 2
Then
0
{ } 0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2x
0
0
y
0
x
0
0
2y
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2x
0
x
y
0
2y
0
a1
a 2
a12
a1
a
2
a12
{ } M 'a
1
{a} [X ] {d }
[ B ]{d }
'
B M X
1
1
[ B]
0
2A
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
0
6
6
where the bs and s are now functions of x and y as well as of the nodal coordinates
The B matrix is illustrated for a specific linear-strain triangle in the next example
[
D
]
y
y
xy
xy
{ } [ D] [ B ]{d }
[D]
E
1
1
0
1
2
E
[D]
(1 ) (1 2 )
0
1
0
1 2
2
0
p p (ui , vi , u j , v j , um , vm )
Total potential energy is defined as the sum of the internal
strain energy U and the potential energy of the external
forces , that is:
p U
U b s p
For linear-elastic material, the internal strain energy is given by
U 12 { }T { } dV
V
U 12 { }T [ D ]{ } dV
V
s { }T {T} dS
S
p {d}T {P}
[k ] [ B] [ D] [ B] dV
T
{ f } [ N ]T { X } dV [ N ]T {T } dS { P }
V
Body
forces
1 {d }T
2
Surface
Tractions
T
[ B] [ D] [ B] dV {d } {d }T { f }
Concentrated
nodal forces
[k ] [ B]T [ D] [ B] dV
V
For an element with constant thickness t
[k ] t
[ B]
[ D] [ B] dx dy
[ K ] [k ( e) ]
e 1
{F } [ K ] {d }
N
[ F ] [ f (e) ]
e 1
u ( x , y ) a1 a 2 x a3 y a 4 x 2 a5 x y a6 y
u ( x , y ) a1 a 2 x a3 y a 4 x 2 a5 x y a6 y
{ } y
xy u v
y x
N
u
i i
u i 1
{ } 6
v N v
i
i
i 1
[ B ]{d }
1
1
[ B]
0
2A
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
0
6
6
Example1
1 as an Ex am ple
3x 3 y 2 x 2 4 x y 2 y 2
2
2
N 1 1
b
h
b
bh
h
N 1
4 hx
3 4x 4 y
1 2 A
bh 2
4y
3h
bh
b
x
b b
Performing the differentiations indicated on u and v, we obtain
1 3h
4 hx
4y
b
2 h
3 0
4 4y
5 4 y
6 4h
1 3b 4 x
3 b
4by
h
4by
h
5 4b 4 x
2 0
1 4x
8by
h
6 4 x
4 hx
b
8 hx
4y
b
1
1u 1 2u 2 3u 3 4u 4 5u 5 6u 6
2A
1
y
1v 1 2v 2 3v 3 4v 4 5v 5 6v 6
2A
1
xy
1u 1 1v 1 6u 6 6v 6
2A
[k ] t
[ B]T [ D] [ B] dx dy
A
using calculus to set up the appropriate integration. The explicit expression for
the 12 x 12 stiffness matrix, being extremely cumbersome to obtain, is not given
here.
We can use numerical Integration to evaluate this integration as in Chapter 10
Comparison of Elements
For a given number of nodes, a better representation of true stress and
displacement is Generally obtained using the LST element than is obtained
with the same number of nodes using a much finer subdivision into simple
CST elements.
For example, using one LST yields better results than using four CST
elements with the same number of nodes and hence the same number of
degrees of freedom
Comparison of Elements
Consider the cantilever beam subjected to a parabolic load.
Comparison of Elements
Comparison of Elements
Comparison of Elements
Comparison of Elements
In conclusion,
The LST model might be preferred over the CST model for plane
stress applications when relatively small numbers of nodes are
used.
However, the use of triangular elements of higher order, such as the
LST, is not visibly advantageous when large numbers of nodes
are used, particularly when the cost of formation of the element
stiffnesses, equation bandwidth, and overall complexities involved
in the computer modeling are considered.
{ f } [ k ] {d }
1a) Element stiffness matrix:
[k ] t
[ B]T [ D] [ B] dx dy
{ f } [ N ]T { X } dV [ N ]T {T } dS { P }
V
[ K ] [k
(e)
e 1
[ F ] [ f (e) ]
e 1
{F } [ K ] {d }
4) Find element strains and stresses
{ } [ B ] {d }
{ } [ D][ B]{d }
HW:
8.3, 8.4 and 8.5