Teva Pantoprazole
Teva Pantoprazole
Teva Pantoprazole
Pr
TEVA-PANTOPRAZOLE
Table of Contents
Page 2 of 34
Pr
TEVA-PANTOPRAZOLE
Oral
20 mg and 40 mg
delayed release
tablets
Duodenal ulcer
Gastric ulcer
Reflux esophagitis
Symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease (such as, acid regurgitation and
heartburn).
Prevention of gastrointestinal lesions induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs) in patients with a need for continuous NSAID treatment, who have increased
risk to develop NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal lesions.
For the maintenance treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis and the resolution of symptoms
associated with reflux esophagitis, such as heartburn with or without regurgitation,
20 mg or 40 mg pantoprazole once daily have been used for 3 years in controlled clinical trials. In
continuous maintenance treatment 20 mg pantoprazole has been used in a limited number of
patients for up to eight years.
Page 3 of 34
duration of PPI therapy appropriate to the condition being treated. Patients at risk for
osteoporosis-related fractures should be managed according to established treatment guidelines
(see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and ADVERSE REACTIONS).
Pantoprazole sodium should not be administered to pregnant women unless the expected benefits
outweigh the potential risks to the fetus (see REPRODUCTION AND TERATOLOGY).
Nursing Women: Animal studies have shown excretion of pantoprazole in breast milk.
Excretion into human milk has been reported. Pantoprazole sodium should not be given to
nursing mothers unless its use is believed to outweigh the potential risks to the infant.
Pediatrics: The safety and effectiveness of pantoprazole in children have not yet been
established.
Geriatrics (> 65 years of age): No dose adjustment is recommended based on age. The daily
dose used in elderly patients, as a rule, should not exceed the recommended dosage regimens. See
PHARMACOLOGY. Benefits of use of PPIs should be weighed against the increased risk of
fractures as patients in this category (> 71 years of age) may already be at high risk for
osteoporosis-related fractures. If the use of PPIs is required, they should be managed carefully
according to established treatment guidelines (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and
ADVERSE REACTIONS).
ADVERSE REACTIONS
Adverse Drug Reaction Overview
Pantoprazole sodium is well tolerated. Most adverse events have been mild and transient showing
no consistent relationship with treatment.
The following adverse events (the most frequently reported) have been reported in individuals
receiving pantoprazole therapy (40 mg once daily) in controlled clinical trials of at least 6 months
duration: Headache (2.1%), Diarrhea (1.6%), Nausea (1.2%).
Clinical Trial Adverse Drug Reactions
Because clinical trials are conducted under very specific conditions the adverse reaction
rates observed in the clinical trials may not reflect the rates observed in practice and
should not be compared to the rates in the clinical trials of another drug. Adverse drug
reaction information from clinical trials is useful for identifying drug-related adverse
events and for approximating rates.
Adverse events have been recorded during controlled clinical investigations in over 13,000
patients exposed to pantoprazole sodium as the single therapeutic agent for treatment of
conditions requiring acid suppression. The following adverse reactions considered possibly,
probably, or definitely related by the investigator have been reported in individuals receiving
pantoprazole therapy (20 mg or 40 mg once daily) in long-term clinical trials (duration of least 6
months).
Adverse drug reactions with a frequency of 1%, related to 40 mg pantoprazole
assessed as possibly, probably or definitely related by the investigator
Preferred term
Headache
Number of patients
24
Percentage of patients
2.137
Diarrhea
Nausea
18
13
1.603
1.158
For long-term treatment with 20 mg, no such events were reported with a frequency of more than
1%.
The following Serious Adverse Events regardless of causality were reported with a frequency of
<0.1% in either 20 mg or 40 mg: Sepsis
Abnormal Hematological & Clinical Chemistry Findings
Please refer to the Hepatobiliary Disorders and the Laboratory Parameters portions of the
ADVERSE REACTIONS section, the ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Special
Populations & Conditions section, and the WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Hepatic/Biliary/Pancreatic section.
Post-Market Adverse Drug Reactions
The following adverse events, were reported in post-marketing use and causal relation to
pantoprazole sodium treatment could not be ruled out. As the events were reported
spontaneously, no exact incidences can be provided:
Interstitial nephritis; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Erythema multiforme; Toxic epidermal
necrolysis (Lyell syndrome); Photosensitivity; Hyponatraemia; Hypomagnesaemia;
Hepatocellular injury; Jaundice; Hepatocellular failure; Hallucination; Confusion (especially in
pre-disposed patients, as well as the aggravation of these symptoms in the case of pre-existence).
Hypokinesia, Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy; Pancreatitis; Increased salivation; Speech
disorder; Elevated creatine phosphokinase; Rhabdomyolysis; Alopecia; Acne; Exfoliative
dermatitis; Nervousness; Tremor; Tinnitus; Paresthesia; Photophobia; Vertigo; Increased
appetite; Hematuria; Impotence; Eosinophilia; Osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures.
In addition the following identified adverse drug reactions have been reported in oral
pantoprazole sodium clinical trials in any indication and in any dosage:
Uncommon: Headache; Dizziness; Nausea/vomiting; Abdominal distension and bloating;
constipation; dry mouth; Abdominal pain and discomfort; Rash/exanthema/eruption; Pruritus;
Asthenia, fatigue and malaise; Liver enzymes increased (transaminases, -GT); Sleep disorders.
Rare: Agranulocytosis; Disturbances in vision/blurred vision; Urticaria; Angioedema; Myalgia;
Arthralgia; Hyperlipidaemias and lipid increases (triglycerides, cholesterol); Weight changes;
Body temperature increased; Oedema peripheral; Gynaecomastia; Hypersensitivity (including
anaphylactic reactions and anaphylactic shock); Bilirubin increased; Depression (and all
aggravations); Taste Disorder.
Very rare: thrombocytopenia; leukopenia; pancytopenia; disorientation (and all aggravations).
Withdrawal of long-term PPI therapy can lead to aggravation of acid related symptoms and may
result in rebound acid hypersecretion.
DRUG INTERACTIONS
Overview
of cyanocobalamin deficiency under acid-blocking therapy have been reported in the literature
and should be considered if respective clinical symptoms are observed.
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment
DUODENAL ULCER
The recommended adult dose of TEVA-PANTOPRAZOLE for the oral treatment of duodenal
ulcer is 40 mg as pantoprazole given once daily in the morning. Healing usually occurs within 2
weeks. For patients not healed after this initial course of therapy, an additional course of 2 weeks
is recommended.
GASTRIC ULCER
The recommended adult oral dose of pantoprazole for the oral treatment of gastric ulcer is 40 mg
given once daily in the morning. Healing usually occurs within 4 weeks. For patients not healed
after this initial course of therapy, an additional course of 4 weeks is recommended.
SYMPTOMATIC GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GERD)
The recommended adult oral dose for the treatment of symptoms of GERD, including heartburn
and regurgitation, is 40 mg once daily for up to 4 weeks. If significant symptom relief is not
obtained in 4 weeks, further investigation is required.
REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
The recommended adult oral dose of pantoprazole is 40 mg, given once daily in the morning. In
most patients, healing usually occurs within 4 weeks. For patients not healed after this initial
course of therapy, an additional 4 weeks of treatment is recommended.
Both 20 mg and 40 mg once daily have been demonstrated to be effective in the
maintenance of healing of reflux esophagitis. If maintenance therapy fails when using 20 mg
once daily, consideration may be given to the 40 mg daily dose as maintenance therapy.
PREVENTION OF GASTROINTESTINAL LESIONS INDUCED BY NSAIDSs
The recommended adult oral dose of pantoprazole is 20 mg, given once daily in the morning.
Patients should use the lowest dose and shortest duration of PPI therapy appropriate to the
condition being treated.
Missed Dose
If a dose is forgotten, the missed dose should be taken as soon as possible unless it is close to the
next scheduled dose. Two doses should never be taken at one time to make up for a missed dose;
patients should just return to the regular schedule.
Administration
Reconstitution
Not applicable.
OVERDOSAGE
For management of a suspected drug overdose contact your regional Poison Control Centre.
Some reports of overdosage with pantoprazole have been received. No consistent symptom
profile was observed after ingestion of high doses of pantoprazole. Daily doses of up to 272 mg
pantoprazole i.v. and single doses of up to 240 mg i.v. were administered over 2 minutes have
been administered and were well tolerated.
As pantoprazole is extensively protein bound, it is not readily dialyzable. In the case of
overdosage with clinical signs of intoxication, apart from symptomatic and supportive treatment,
no specific therapeutic recommendations can be made.
In clinical studies investigating intravenous (i.v.) and oral administration, pantoprazole sodium
inhibited pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion. With a daily oral dose of 40 mg,
inhibition was 51% on Day 1 and 85% on Day 7. Basal 24-hour acidity was reduced by 37% and
98% on Days 1 and 7, respectively.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption: Pantoprazole is absorbed rapidly following administration of a 40 mg enteric coated
tablet. Its oral bioavailability compared to the i.v. dosage form is 77% and does not change upon
multiple dosing. Following an oral dose of 40 mg, C max is approximately 2.5 g/mL with a tmax
of 2 to 3 h. The AUC is approximately 5 g.h/L. There is no food effect on AUC (bioavailability)
and Cmax.
Distribution: Pantoprazole is 98% bound to serum proteins. Elimination half-life, clearance and
volume of distribution are independent of the dose.
Metabolism: Pantoprazole is almost completely metabolized in the liver. Studies with
pantoprazole in humans reveal no inhibition or activation of the cytochrome P450 (CYP 450)
system of the liver.
Excretion: Renal elimination represents the major route of excretion (about 82%) for the
metabolites of pantoprazole sodium, the remaining metabolites are excreted in feces. The main
metabolite in both the serum and urine is desmethylpantoprazole as a sulphate conjugate. The
half-life of the main metabolite (about 1.5 hours) is not much longer than that of pantoprazole
(approximately 1 hour).
Pantoprazole shows linear pharmacokinetics, i.e., AUC and Cmax increase in proportion with the
dose within the dose-range of 10 to 80 mg after both i.v.and oral administration. Elimination halflife, clearance and volume of distribution are considered to be dose-independent. Following
repeated i.v. or oral administration, the AUC of pantoprazole was similar to a single dose.
Special Populations and Conditions
Pediatrics: The safety and effectiveness of pantoprazole in children have not yet been
established.
Geriatrics: An increase in AUC (35%) and Cmax (22%) for pantoprazole occurs in elderly
volunteers when compared to younger volunteers after 7 consecutive days oral dosing with
pantoprazole 40 mg. After a single oral dose of 40 mg, an increase in AUC (43%) and Cmax
(26%) occurs in elderly volunteers when compared to younger volunteers. No dose adjustment is
recommended based on age. The daily dose in elderly patients, as a rule, should not exceed the
recommended dosage regimens.
Hepatic Insufficiency: The half-life increased to between 7 and 9 h, the AUC increased by a
factor of 5 to 7, and the Cmax increased by a factor of 1.5 in patients with liver cirrhosis compared
with healthy subjects following administration of 40 mg pantoprazole. Similarly, following
administration of a 20 mg dose, the AUC increased by a factor of 5.5 and the Cmax increased by a
factor of 1.3 in patients with severe liver cirrhosis compared with healthy subjects. Considering
the linear pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole, there is an increase in AUC by a factor of 2.75 in
patients with severe liver cirrhosis following administration of a 20 mg dose compared to healthy
volunteers following administration of a 40 mg dose. Thus, the daily dose in patients with severe
liver disease should, as a rule, not exceed 20 mg pantoprazole.
Renal Insufficiency: In patients with severe renal impairment, pharmacokinetic parameters for
pantoprazole were similar to those of healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment is necessary in
patients with renal impairment or in patients undergoing hemodialysis, as the difference in AUCs
between patients who are dialyzed and those who are not is 4%.
Chemical name:
Molecular formula and molecular mass: C16H14F2N3NaO4S 1.5 H2O 432.36 g/mol
C16H15F2N3O4S
Structural formula:
pka:
pka1:
pka2:
4.0
3.92
8.19
CLINICAL TRIALS
Comparative Bioavailability Studies
An evaluation of the comparative bioavailability between the test formulation, pantoprazole
sodium DR Tablets 40 mg (TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Israel), and the reference
formulation Pantoloc Enteric Coated Tablets 40 mg (Solvay Pharma Inc., Canada/ Altana
Pharma AG, Germany) was performed in healthy subjects under fasting conditions after a
blinded, single-dose, two-period, two-treatment, crossover study. The Comparative
Bioavailability Data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: SUMMARY TABLE OF THE COMPARATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY DATA
Fasting Study
Pantoprazole sodium delayed-release tablets
(1x 40 mg)
From measured data
Geometric Mean
Arithmetic Mean (CV %)
Parameter
Test*
Reference
% Ratio of
Geometric Means
AUCT
(ngh/mL)
4895.8
6495.5 (98)
5175.7
6725.8 (92)
94.59
88.99 100.55
AUCI
(ngh/mL)
4993.2
7012.8 (119)
5296.2
7395.1 (119)
94.28
88.74 100.16
CMAX
(ng/mL)
2433.0
2760.4 (48)
2722.6
2922.2 (37)
89.36
81.36 98.15
2.97 (38)
2.89 (47)
0.6628 (37)
0.6826 (36)
TMAX
(h)
T
(h)
*
Reference
4617.0
5005.7
7072.5 (134)
7649.3 (134)
4745.1
5069.2
7676.2 (147)
7687.5 (147)
2067.5
2301.4
(ng/mL)
2344.6 (52)
2555.9 (48)
Tmax
10.79 (53)
10.53 (61)
Parameter
AUCT
(ngh/mL)
AUCI
(ngh/mL)
Cmax
% Ratio of
Geometric Means
92.23
93.61
87.83 - 99.76
89.83
82.39 - 97.95
(h)
T
1.86 (121)
1.71 (136)
(h)
*
Time
interval
(months)
In a six-month study involving 595 patients requiring continuous intake of NSAIDs, treatment
with pantoprazole 20 mg od was equivalent to the treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg od and
omeprazole 20 mg od in this indication.
In a second six-month study involving 515 patients requiring continuous intake of NSAIDs,
pantoprazole 20 mg was not only equivalent but statistically significantly superior to treatment
with misoprostol 200 g bid with respect to symptomatic and endoscopic findings.
Prevention of relapse of reflux esophagitis
The long-term maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis was assessed in two U.S.
randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active controlled studies. Eligible patients in both
studies had a recent history of grade II or III (Hetzel-Dent) erosive esophagitis, and
endoscopically demonstrated healing. Both studies used as the primary endpoint endoscopically
demonstrated recurrence (assessed at month 1, 3, 6 and 12) of erosive esophagitis ('relapse').
Gelusil antacid tablets were to be taken as needed for symptomatic relief after 5 or more minutes
of retrosternal pain, acid regurgitation, or dysphagia, but not within 1 hour before or after taking
study medication. Ad hoc endoscopies were performed when symptoms of GERD occurred for
more than 3 consecutive days. As the primary analysis Kaplan Meiers method was performed,
whereas the discrete analysis was secondary.
In the US studies, the results of Kaplan-Meiers analyses showed that the cumulative proportion
of relapse over time was dose-related for the pantoprazole treatment groups. The cumulative
proportion of relapse at 12 months for patients treated with pantoprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole
40 mg exhibited a statistically significant difference in the pooled data (pvalue= 0.001) and in the
data of one of the studies (3001A1-302-US: p-value =0.012, 3001A1-303-US p-value=0.052) (pvalues adjusted for pairwise comparison).
In the discrete analysis of the pooled results of the two U.S. studies, 40 mg was significantly (pvalue= 0.004) more effective in the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis compared to 20
mg (see following table).
Long-term maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis: Proportion of patients who
relapse in individual studies and pooled studies at 12 months. U.S. Studies
Study 3001A1-302-US
Month 1
Month 3
Month 6
Month 12
Study 3001A1-303-US
Month 1
Month 3
Month 6
Month 12
Pantoprazole 20 mg
n/N(%)
Pantoprazole 40 mg
n/N(%)
Ranitidine 150 mg
n/N(%)
11/86(12.8)*
17/77(22.1)*
21/77(27.3)*
25/75(33.3)*
1/78(1.3)*
5/76(6.6)*
8/70(11.4)*
10/64(15.6)* a
32/84(38.1)
41/81(50.6)
47/77(61.0)
52/76(68.4)
11/87(12.6)*
21/80(26.3)*
24/75(32.0)*
25/73(34.2)*
8/93(8.6)*
10/88(11.4)*
12/85(14.1)*
15/78(19.2)*
37/92(40.2)
45/83(54.2)
51/79(64.6)
52/78(66.7)
Pooled data
Month 12
50/148 (33.8) *
25/142 (17.6) * a
104/154 (67.5)
* Statistically significant between treatment and ranitidine at 0.05 level; a Statistically significant between
pantorazole 40 mg and 20 mg with adjusted p-value (Holm procedure). Mean age 302-US 49.2 years, 303-US
48.95 years, 302-US: 28% female / 72% male 303-US: 38% female / 62% male, 302-US: 3.9 % black, 4.1 %
Hispanic, <1% Asian, 91% white, <1% other, US-303: 6.4 % black, 6.4 % Hispanic, <1% Asian, 86% white, <1%
other.
Month
Diff. Between
Treatment and 95%
CI (%)
40 mg
20 mg
Pantoprazole
Pantoprazole
FK3028
12
39/174 (22)
45/174 (26)
-3.5 (-12.4;5.5)
FK3033
12
30/151 (20)
49/161 (30)
-10.6 (-20;-1)
Pooled
12
69/325 (21)
94/335 (28)
-6.8 (-13.4;-0.3)
Mean age FK3028 56 years, FK3033 50 years, FK3028 35% female /65% male, FK.3033: 28% female / 72% male
* These studies were performed between 1993 1997
DETAILED PHARMACOLOGY
ANIMAL PHARMACOLOGY
Pharmacodynamics:
In vivo, pantoprazole produced marked and long-lasting inhibition of basal and stimulated gastric
acid secretion with median effective dose (ED50) values ranging from 0.2 -2.4 mg/kg in rats and
dogs. In addition to the administration of single doses, pantoprazole has been tested upon
repeated oral administration (e.g. during 24-h pH-metry in dogs performed under pentagastrin
stimulation). While a dose of 1.2 mg/kg did not significantly elevate pH on Day 1, pH rose to
values between 4 and 7 after a 5-day dosing regimen. This effect was no longer observed 18
hours after the last drug administration. In various gastric ulcer models in the rat, pantoprazole
showed antiulcer activity.
In parallel to the profound inhibition of gastric acid secretion, pantoprazole induced a dosedependent increase in serum gastrin levels up to values above 1000 pg/mL from a control level of
about 100 pg/mL. As a consequence of persisting hypergastrinemia in rats after high/doses of
pantoprazole, hyperplastic changes were observed in the fundic mucosa with an increased density
of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells. These changes were reversible during drug-free recovery
periods.
In a battery of standard high-dose pharmacology tests, no influence of pantoprazole was detected
on the central and peripheral nervous system. In conscious dogs as well as anaesthetized cats
receiving single i.v. doses up to 10 mg/kg pantoprazole, no consistent changes with respect to
respiratory rate, ECG, EEG, blood pressure and heart rate were observed. Higher doses led to
modest and transient reductions in blood pressure and variable changes in heart rate. No influence
of pantoprazole was found on renal function and on autonomic functions, such as pancreatic and
bile secretion, gastrointestinal motility and body temperature.
No consistent changes in the effects of ethanol, pentobarbitone, or hexobarbitone were induced
by pantoprazole; only doses over 300 mg/kg prolonged the effects of diazepam.
Pharmacokinetics:
Absorption and Distribution
Pantoprazole is absorbed rapidly in both rat and dog. Peak plasma levels are attained within 15 to
20 minutes in the rat and after about 1 hour in the dog. Oral bioavailability is 33% in the rat and
49 % in the dog. Following absorption, autoradiography and quantitative tissue distribution
experiments have shown that pantoprazole is rapidly distributed to extravascular sites. Following
administration of pantoprazole, distribution of radioactivity in the blood and most organs is found
to be uniform initially. After 16 hours, radiolabelled pantoprazole is predominantly detected in
the stomach wall. After 48 hours, all the administered radioactivity is found to have been
excreted. Penetration of the blood-brain barrier by radiolabelled pantoprazole is very low. Protein
binding in the rat and dog is 95% and 86%, respectively.
Metabolism and Excretion
Pantoprazole is extensively metabolized. Oxidations and reductions at different sites of the
molecule, together with Phase II reactions (sulfation and glucuronidation) and combinations
thereof result in the formation of various metabolites. In rats and dogs, 29 - 33% of a
pantoprazole dose is excreted as urinary metabolites, and the remainder as biliary/fecal
metabolites. Almost no parent compound can be found in the excreta.
Mammoglandular passage and transplacental transport has been investigated in the rat using
radiolabelled pantoprazole. A maximum of 0.23% of the administered dose is excreted in the
milk. Radioactivity penetrates the placenta with 0.1-0.2% of the dose /g fetal tissue on the first
day after oral administration.
HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY
Pharmacodynamics:
Pantoprazole is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. This was demonstrated with
pantoprazole by use of a gastric acid aspiration technique as well as by continuous intragastric pH
monitoring. Using the aspiration technique it was also shown that pantoprazole caused a dosedependent reduction of secreted gastric acid volume.
6 mg
13%
10 mg
24%
20 mg
27%
40 mg
42%
60 mg
54%
80 mg
80%
100 mg
82%
With 40 mg administered orally, effective inhibition of gastric acid secretion was achieved.
Pantoprazole 40 mg was significantly superior to standard H2-blocker therapy (300 mg ranitidine
at night) with regard to median 24-hour and daytime pH; however, not for night time
measurements.
Table 4: Effects of one week oral treatment in healthy volunteers with placebo,
pantoprazole 40 mg in the morning, and standard ranitidine therapy with 300 mg in the
evening.
Time of Day
Median pH
Placebo
Pantoprazole
40 mg
Ranitidine
300 mg
08.00-08.00 (24h)
1.6
4.2*
2.7
08.00-22.00
(Day Time)
1.8
4.4*
2.0
1.3
3.1
3.7
22.00-8.00
(Night Time)
* p<0.05 vs ranitidine
Increasing the once daily dose from 40 mg to 80 mg pantoprazole did not result in a significantly
higher median 24-hour pH.
80 mg
3.85
n.s
Hence, once daily administration of 40 mg pantoprazole should be sufficient for the treatment of
most patients with acid-related diseases.
Pharmacokinetics:
The absolute bioavailability of the pantoprazole tablet is 77%. Maximum serum concentrations of
pantoprazole are reached within approximately 2.5 hours after oral intake. Following a dose of 40
mg, mean maximum serum concentrations of approximately 2 g/mL and 3 g/mL are reached
after 2 to 3 hours. There is no food effect on AUC (bioavailability) and Cmax. However, time to
reach maximum serum concentrations is slightly increased when the drug is given together with a
high caloric breakfast. Taking into account the long duration of action of pantoprazole, which by
far exceeds the time period over which serum concentrations are measurable, this observed
variation in tmax is considered to be of no clinical importance.
Pantoprazole is approximately 98% bound to serum protein.
Despite its relatively short elimination half-life of approximately 1 hour, the antisecretory effect
increases during repeated once daily administration, demonstrating that the duration of action
markedly exceeds the serum elimination half-life. This means that there is no direct correlation
between the serum concentrations and the pharmacodynamic action.
Morning administration of pantoprazole was significantly superior to evening dosing with regard
to 24 hour intragastric pH, hence morning dosing should be recommended for the treatment of
patients. Since the intake of the drug before a breakfast did not influence Cmax and AUC, which
characterize rate and extent of absorption, no specific requirements for intake of pantoprazole in
relation to breakfast are necessary.
Pantoprazole undergoes metabolic transformation in the liver. Approximately 82% of the oral
dose is removed by renal excretion, and the remainder via feces. The main serum metabolites
(M1-M3) are sulphate conjugates formed after demethylation at the pyridine moiety, the
sulphoxide group being either retained (M2, main metabolite), or oxidized to a sulphone (M1), or
reduced to a sulphide (M3). These metabolites also occur in the urine (main metabolite M2).
Conjugates with glucuronic acid are also found in the urine.
TOXICOLOGY
ACUTE TOXICITY
In acute toxicity studies in mice the mean lethal dose (LD50) values for pantoprazole were found
to be around 390 mg/kg bodyweight for i.v. administration and around 700 mg/kg bodyweight for
oral administration.
In the rat the corresponding values were around 250 mg/kg for i.v. administration and >1000
mg/kg for oral administration.
Acute toxicity studies were conducted on B8810-044, the major degradation product of
pantoprazole. The approximate LD50 values for mice (119-167 mg/kg) and rats (73-82 mg/kg)
were lower than those for pantoprazole itself, after intravenous injection, but the toxic symptoms
were similar to those noted for the drug. A 4-week repeat dose study was also conducted using
this degradation product using the intravenous route in rats. Rats received 5 and 25 mg of
B8810-044/kg, while a comparison group received 25 mg/kg of pantoprazole. Muscle twitches
were observed immediately after injection in rats receiving 25 mg/kg of the degradation product,
but not in the pantoprazole-treated animals. Otherwise the compounds were comparable.
SEX
ROUTE
ca. LD50 *
(mg/kg)
Mouse
Mouse
Rat
Rat
Dog
p.o.
>1000
p.o.
747
i.v.
399
i.v.
395
p.o.
1343
p.o.
1037
i.v.
330
i.v.
343
M/F
p.o.
300-1000**
M/F
i.v.
150-300
The symptoms seen after lethal oral or i.v. doses were similar in rats and mice: the animals
displayed ataxia, reduced activity, hypothermia and prostration. Surviving animals recovered
uneventfully. Salivation, tremor, lethargy, prostration and coma were seen in dogs at lethal oral
doses, with death occurring on the following day. Ataxia, tremor and a prone position were noted
at sublethal oral and i.v. doses, but the survivors recovered quickly and appeared fully normal
after the 2-week observation period.
CHRONIC TOXICITY
Daily oral doses of pantoprazole in the 1 - and 6 - month SD rat repeated-dose studies were 1, 5,
20, and 500 mg/kg and 0.8, 4, 16 and 320 mg/kg, respectively; doses for a 1 month rat i.v. study
were 1, 5, and 30 mg/kg.
A 12-month toxicity study in SD rats was conducted using daily oral doses of 5, 50, and 300
mg/kg. Daily oral doses in the 1- and 6 month (beagle) dog studies were 7.5, 15, 30, and 100
mg/kg and 5, 15, 30, and 60 mg/kg respectively. In the 12-month oral study in dogs, 2.5, 15, and
60 mg/kg were administered daily.
Hypergastrinemia was dose-related and was observed at all doses investigated in the studies
mentioned above, but was reversible upon cessation of treatment. Drug-related effects on the
stomach included increased stomach weights and morphologic changes of the mucosa. In the 6month rat study, increased stomach weight and some cellular changes were detected at all doses.
In the 1-month rat study, gastric changes were detected at 5 mg/kg but not at 1 mg/kg. In dogs,
increased stomach weight was observed at all doses studied. There were no gastric cellular
changes detected at oral doses of 7.5 or 5 mg/kg in the 1- and 6-month dog studies, respectively.
In both species, most gastric effects were reversible after a 4- or 8-week recovery period.
Hypergastrinemia and gastric changes were considered to be the consequence of the
pharmacological action of the compound, namely prolonged and profound inhibition of acid
secretion.
Increased liver weight in the rat experiments was considered to be a consequence of the induction
of hepatic drug metabolizing systems and was found to be associated with centrilobular
hepatocellular hypertrophy at 320 mg/kg in the 6-month study and at 50 and 300 mg/kg after 12
months of treatment. Increased liver weights were also detected at a dose of 16 mg/kg in male
rats in the 6-month study and at 500 mg/kg, but not 20 mg/kg, in the 1-month study. Increased
liver weight was noted in male dogs of all dose groups in the 1-month study, though only at 100
mg/kg in females on the same study. Both males and females had increased liver weights after 6
months administration of 30 or 60 mg/kg, but not of 15 mg/kg. In the 12-month study, liver
weights were increased only in the female dogs dosed with 60 mg/kg. There were no hepatic
lesions that correlated with increased liver weight in the dog studies. In dogs, the increase in liver
weight was attributed to an activation of hepatic drug metabolizing systems as mentioned
for rats.
Thyroid activation in animal experiments is due to the rapid metabolization of thyroid hormones
in the liver and has been described in a similar form for other drugs. Thyroid weights were
increased in both sexes at 500 mg/kg in the 1-month rat study and at 320 mg/kg in the rat 6
month study. Thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy was noted in females at these doses, in rats
treated with 50 and 300 mg/kg in the 12 month study and also in a few females at 16 mg/kg in the
6 month study. There were no thyroid effects in rats at or below an oral dose of 5 mg/kg even
after 1 year. In the dog, no effects were seen on the thyroid after 4 weeks. Only slight, but not
dose-dependent, increases in thyroid weights were seen after 6 months, but no changes were
observed histologically. In the 12 month study, the relative thyroid weights in the 60 mg/kg
group were only slightly higher than those of the control dogs, and changes were detected
histologically in only a few animals under 15 and 60 mg/kg. In both species, changes were
reversible.
Increased serum cholesterol values were noted in all groups in the 6- and 12 month dog studies
and in all groups in the 12 month rat study. The increases were slight and were reversible after
cessation of treatment.
In dog studies, oral doses of pantoprazole of 15 mg/kg or above caused a transient pulmonary
edema in a proportion of naive dogs during the first week of drug administration. Pulmonary
edema caused death in a few dogs after repeated oral doses of 15 mg/kg or above. There is strong
evidence that the pulmonary toxicity is due to a thiol metabolite which does not occur in man. No
evidence of pulmonary edema was detected in dogs at an oral dose of 7.5 mg/kg nor at 60 mg/kg
when administered daily for 6 or 12 months after a 1 week dose escalation phase.
CARCINOGENIClTY
Three carcinogenicity studies had been conducted with pantoprazole:
A 24 month oral study was conducted at doses of 0.5, 5, 50 and 200 mg/kg/day in SD rat.
A 24 month oral study was conducted at doses of 5, 15 and 50 mg/kg/day in Fischer-344
rat.
A 24 month oral study was conducted at doses of 5, 25 and 150 mg/kg/day in B6C3F1
mouse.
Pantoprazole, dissolved in distilled water, was administered once a day by oral gavage to groups
of 50 male and 50 female B6C3F1 mice at doses of 5, 25, or 150 mg/kg. An identical control
group was dosed with distilled water (pH 10), while a second identical control group received no
treatment at all. In the first rat study, pantoprazole was administered once a day by oral gavage
to groups of 70 male and 70 female SD rats at doses of 0.5, 5, 50, and 200 mg/kg. A control
group of 70 males and 70 females received the vehicle. In the second rat study, pantoprazole was
administered once a day by oral gavage to groups of 50 male and 50 female Fischer-344 rats at
doses of 5, 15, and 50 mg/kg. A control group of 50 males and 50 females received the vehicle,
while another group remained untreated.
In the first 2 year carcinogenicity study in rats, which corresponds to a lifetime treatment for rats,
neuroendocrine neoplasms were found in the stomach at doses of 50 mg/kg/day and above in
males and at 0.5 mg/kg/day and above in females. Tumor formation occurred late in the life of
the animals (only after 17 months treatment), whereas no tumors were found in rats treated with
an even higher dose for 1 year. The mechanism leading to the formation of gastric carcinoids by
substituted benzimidazoles has been carefully investigated, and it is considered to be due to high
levels of serum gastrin observed in the rat during chronic treatment. In the second rat
carcinogenicity study, neuroendocrine cell tumors in the stomach were found in all treated female
groups and in the male 15 and 50 mg/kg groups. No metastases from any gastric neuroendocrine
cell tumours were detected.
ECL-cell neoplasms were not observed in either the carcinogenicity study in the mouse (24
months) or in the chronic studies in the dog. In clinical studies, where pantoprazole was
administered at doses up to 80 mg, ECL-cell density remained almost unchanged.
Microscopy of the rat (first carcinogenicity study) and mouse tissues gave evidence for an
increase in liver tumors. In the rat experiment, the incidence of benign liver tumors in the 50 and
200 mg/kg groups and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was increased in the males and
females of the 200 mg/kg group. There was a slightly higher incidence of hepatocellular
adenomas and carcinomas in the female mice of the 150 mg/kg group than in either of the 2
control groups. Other changes in the liver morphology were present as well. Centrilobular
hepatocellular hypertrophy increased in incidence and severity with increasing dose, and
hepatocellular necrosis was increased in the highest dose in the rat studies and in the mouse
study. Hepatocellular tumors are common in mice, and the incidence found for the female 150
mg/kg group was within historical control ranges for this strain. The liver tumor incidences in
rats treated with 50 mg/kg and in the male rats treated with 200 mg/kg were also within historical
control incidences for the rat. These tumors occurred late in the life of the animals and were
primarily benign. The nongenotoxic mechanism of rodent liver tumor formation after prolonged
treatment with pantoprazole is associated with enzyme induction leading to hepatomegaly and
centrilobular hypertrophy and is characterized by tumor induction in low incidences at high doses
only. As pantoprazole acts in a similar fashion to phenobarbital, causing reversible centrilobular
hepatocellular hypertrophy and enzyme induction in short-term studies, it is probable that the
mechanism of action for induction of the liver tumors seen in long-term rodent studies is also the
same. Hepatocellular tumors at high doses in rodents are not indicative of human carcinogenic
risk.
A slight increase in neoplastic changes of the thyroid was observed in rats receiving pantoprazole
at 200 mg/kg/day. The incidences of these tumours were within the historical control ranges for
this rat strain. No thyroid neoplasms were observed in the 12-month study. The no-effect dose for
both male and female rats is 50 mg/kg, which is 100 times the most commonly used human dose
(i.e. 40 mg dose). The effect of pantoprazole on the thyroid is secondary to the effects on liver
enzyme induction, which lead to enhanced metabolism of thyroid hormones in the liver. As a
consequence, increased TSH is produced, which has a trophic effect on the thyroid gland.
Clinical studies have demonstrated that neither liver enzyme induction nor changes in thyroid
hormonal parameters occur in man after therapeutic doses of pantoprazole.
Tumours induced in rats and mice by pantoprazole were the result of nongenotoxic mechanisms
which are not relevant to humans. Tumours were induced in rodents at dosages that provide
higher exposure than with human therapeutic use. Based on kinetic data, the exposure to
pantoprazole in rats receiving 200 mg/kg was 22.5 times higher than that found in humans
receiving 40 mg oral doses. In mice receiving 150 mg/kg, exposure to pantoprazole was 2.5 times
higher than that in humans.
MUTAGENICITY
Pantoprazole was studied in several mutagenicity studies: Pantoprazole was found negative in the
Ames test, an in vivo chromosome aberration assay in rat bone marrow, a mouse lymphoma test,
two gene mutation tests in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro, and two micronucleus tests in
mice in vivo. Pantoprazole was found positive in three of four chromosome aberration assays in
human lymphocytes in vitro. The in vitro tests were conducted both in the presence and absence
of metabolic activation. The potential of pantoprazole to induce DNA repair synthesis was tested
negative in an in vitro assay using rat hepatocytes. In addition, a rat liver DNA covalent binding
assay showed no biologically relevant binding of pantoprazole to DNA.
In addition, two in vitro cell transformation assays using different cell types were performed to
aid in the interpretation of the rodent carcinogenicity studies; in neither test did pantoprazole
enhance the morphologic transformation of the cell types used.
A bacterial mutation assay conducted with the degradation product B8810-044, gave no
indication of a mutagenic potential.
REPRODUCTION AND TERATOLOGY
Pantoprazole was not teratogenic to rats or rabbits at doses up to 450 and 40 mg/kg/day (gavage),
20 and 15 mg/kg/day (i.v. injection), respectively.
Treatment of male rats with pantoprazole up to 500 mg/kg p.o. for 127 days did not affect
fertility. Treatment of pregnant rats induced dose-dependent fetotoxic effects: increased pre- and
postnatal deaths (450 mg/kg/day), reduced fetal weight and delayed skeletal ossification (150
mg/kg/day), and reduced pup weight (15 mg/kg/day). These results may be explained by maternal
toxicity of pantoprazole at high dose and/or placental transfer of pantoprazole.
Penetration of the placenta was investigated in the rat and was found to increase with advanced
gestation. As a result, concentration of pantoprazole in the fetus is increased shortly before birth
regardless of the route of administration.
In humans, there are no adequate well-controlled studies with the use of pantoprazole during
pregnancy.
REFERENCES
1. Escourrou J, Deprez P, Saggioro A, et al. Maintenance therapy with pantoprazole 20 mg
prevents relapse of reflux esophagitis. Ailment Pharmacol Ther 1999 Nov; 13 (11): 148191.
2. Gugler R., Hartmann M., Rudi J., Brod I., Huber R., Steinijans V.W., Bliesath H., Wurst
W., Klotz U.; Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of pantoprazole with diazepam in man;
Br J Pharmacol 1996;42(2):249-252.
3. Hanauer G., Graf U., Meissner T.; In vivo cytochrome P-450 interactions of the newly
developed H+, K+-ATPase inhibitor Pantoprazole (BY1023/SK&F96022) compared to
other antiulcer drugs; Meth Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1991 ;13(1):63-67
4. Hannan A., Weil, J., Broom C., Walt RP.; Effects of oral Pantoprazole on 24 hour
intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin profiles; Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1992; 6:373-380.
5. Hartmann M., Thei U., Bliesath H., Kuhn I., Lhmann R., Huber R., Wurst W., Postius
S., Lcker P.; 24 h intragastric pH following oral intake of Pantoprazole and omeprazole;
Hellenic J. Gastroenterol 1992;5(suppl.):112 (A No. 451).
6. Huber R, Hartmann M, Bliesath H, Lhmann R, Steinijans VW, Zech K. Pharmacokinetic
of pantoprazole in man; Internal J Clin Pharmacol Therap 1996;34:185-194.
7. Judmaier G., Koelz H.R., Pantoprazole-duodenal ulcer-study group; Comparison of
pantoprazole and ranitidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer; Aliment Pharmacol
Ther 1994;8:81-86.
8. Kliem V., Bahlmann J., Hartmann M., Huber R., Lhmann R., Wurst W.
Pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole with end-stage renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant
1998;13:1189-1193.
9. Kohl B. et al.; (H+, K+)-ATPase inhibiting - 2-[(2-pyridylmethyl)suftinyl] benzimidazoles.
A novel series of dimethoxypyridyl-substituted inhibitors with enhanced selectivity. The
selection of Pantoprazole as a clinical candidate; J Medicinal Chem 1992;35:1049-1057.
10. Kovacs TOG, DeVault K., Metz D., et al. Pantoprazole prevents relapse of healed erosive
esophagitis more effectively than ranitidine in gastroesophagealreflux disease patients.
Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94 (9): 2590 (A No. 53).
11. Mossner J., Holscher A.H., Herz R., Schneider A.; A double-blind study of pantoprazole
and omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a multicentre trial; Aliment
Pharmacol Ther 1995;9:321-326.
12. Mller P., Simon B., Khalil H., Lhmann R., Leucht U., Schneider A.; Dose-range
finding study with the proton pump inhibitor Pantoprazole in acute duodenal ulcer
patients; Z Gastroenterol 1992;30:771-775.
TEVA-PANTOPRAZOLE
Pantoprazole Sodium Sesquihydrate
This leaflet is part III of a three-part "Product Monograph"
published when TEVA-PANTOPRAZOLE was approved for sale
in Canada and is designed specifically for Consumers. This leaflet
is a summary and will not tell you everything about TEVAPANTOPRAZOLE. Contact your doctor or pharmacist if you
have any questions about the drug.
HOW TO STORE IT
Keep your tablets at room temperature (15 to 30C) and in a safe
place, where children cannot reach them. Protect from light.
Overdose:
In case of drug overdose, contact a healthcare practitioner(e.g.
doctor), hospital emergency department or regional Poison
Control Centre immediately, even if there are no symptoms.
Missed Dose:
If you forget to take one dose of TEVA-PANTOPRAZOLE, take
a tablet as soon as you remember, unless it is almost time for your
next dose. If it is, do not take the missed tablet at all. Never
double-up on a dose to make up for the one you have missed, just
go back to your regular schedule.
SIDE EFFECTS AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT THEM
Like any medication, TEVA-PANTOPRAZOLE may cause side
effects in some people. When side effects have been reported,
they have been generally mild and did not last a long time.
Headache, diarrhea and nausea are the most common side effects;
less often rash, itchiness and dizziness can occur. If any of these
become troublesome, consult your doctor. If you experience any
unusual or unexpected symptoms while using TEVAPANTOPRAZOLE, consult your doctor.
Rare
Isolated
Cases
Isolated
Cases
Disturbances in vision*
Liver damage (symptoms
include yellowing of the skin
and eyes)
Severe skin reactions such as,
Stevens-Johnson-Syndrome,
Erythema multiforme,
Exfoliative dermatitis, Toxic
epidermal necrolysis,
Photosensitivity
Muscle wasting
Isolated
Cases
* Most cases reported are not serious
Stop taking
drug and call
you doctor or
pharmacist