Scribd
Upload
1K views

Criteria Ab Initio Paper 2

This document outlines the assessment criteria for evaluating student performance on two sections of a language exam: Section A assesses language use, message conveyance, and format. Students are scored on accurate language, clear communication, and proper format. Section B evaluates language skills, task fulfillment, and format. Students are scored on vocabulary, grammar, message development, logical structure, and appropriate format. The criteria provide descriptors to guide scoring student responses at different levels.

Uploaded by

Philippe Cosentino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views

Criteria Ab Initio Paper 2

This document outlines the assessment criteria for evaluating student performance on two sections of a language exam: Section A assesses language use, message conveyance, and format. Students are scored on accurate language, clear communication, and proper format. Section B evaluates language skills, task fulfillment, and format. Students are scored on vocabulary, grammar, message development, logical structure, and appropriate format. The criteria provide descriptors to guide scoring student responses at different levels.

Uploaded by

Philippe Cosentino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

CRITERIA AB INITIO

Paper 2: Productive skillsSection A

Criterion A: Language

0
1
2

Does the student demonstrate an ability to use the language


effectively and accurately?
Does the student use spelling, calligraphy (see Glossary of
terms), vocabulary and grammatical structures correctly and
accurately?
Language inaccuracies completely obscure communication.
Language inaccuracies often obscure communication.
Language is generally accurate and does not obscure
communication.
Language is mostly accurate and communication is clear.

Criterion B: Message
Is all the relevant information conveyed?
0
1
2
3

No relevant information has been conveyed.


Some relevant information has been conveyed.
More than half of the relevant information has been conveyed.
All relevant information has been conveyed effectively.

Criterion C: Format
Does the format correspond to the task?
0
1

The format is not appropriate.


The format is appropriate.

Paper 2: Productive skillsSection B


Criterion A: Language To what extent does the student demonstrate an
ability to use the language effectively and accurately?

12

Does the student use a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures?


Does the student show an awareness of the appropriate register for the
task?
The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors
below.
The response and communication are of limited effectiveness.
The range of vocabulary used is limited.
Some basic grammatical structures are used accurately. These are
isolated and limited in range.
Register is inappropriate.
The response and communication are partially effective.

34

56

78

The range of vocabulary used is sometimes varied.


Most basic grammatical structures are used accurately.
Register is partially appropriate.
The response is generally accurate and communication is generally
effective.
The range of vocabulary used is varied.
Basic grammatical structures and a limited range of more complex
grammatical structures are used accurately.
Register is generally appropriate.
The response is accurate and communication is effective.
The range of vocabulary used is varied and effective.
Basic and some more complex grammatical structures are used
accurately.
Register is appropriate.

Criterion B: Message To what extent does the student fulfill the task?

12

34

56

78

Are the ideas well developed?


Is there evidence of a logical structure (paragraphing and sequencing)?
Are cohesive devices used effectively?
The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors
below.
The task has been partially fulfilled.
One or more ideas have been identified and have been partially
developed.
There is limited evidence of a logical structure.
There is a partially successful use of a limited range of simple cohesive
devices.

The task has been generally fulfilled.


One or more ideas have been identified and have been developed.
There is evidence of a logical structure.
There is a generally successful use of a range of simple cohesive
devices.
The task has been fulfilled.
All ideas have been identified and some have been developed well.
There is a logical structure.
There is successful use of a range of simple cohesive devices.
The task has been fulfilled effectively.
All ideas have been developed well.
There is an effective, logical structure.
There is successful use of a range of simple and some complex
cohesive devices.

Criterion C: Format To what extent does the student succeed in using


the correct text type?
Does the student use the appropriate format?
0
1
2

The format is not appropriate.


The format is partially appropriate.
The format is appropriate.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy