MASTER PLAN CAMPUS COMPETITION

CONSTRUCTING NEW STUDENT RESIDENCES AND REHABILITATING THE EXISTING ONES

Masteplan Mixed Use Residential Building Serre_Tirana, 2004-2015

Wuxi Master Plan For Mixed Use Complex Buildings_China, 2012

New University of Medicine_Rozzano, Milan , 2004

Student Facilities Building of The Reggio Calabria University_ Rende, 2010

SITE

SITE

GREENERY

GREENERY

GREENERY

GREENERY

GREENERY

LIFE

EXHISTINGBUILDINGS

EXHISTING BUILDINGS

EXHISTING BUILDINGS

EXHISTING BUILDINGS

MEMORY

History of BIG Change

Progressive negative financial records and big concern of the

Government, that have to fund every year the annual looses

Progressive negative financial records and big concern of the

Government, that have to fund every year the annual looses

Loosing 350.000 euro / year

At least 20 Years of
vague, turbid, ambiguousdilemmas!!!
approach of the Government regarding
Student City Campus degrading situation.

Student irony towards the very bad existing conditions

Welcome in Brovina (ex-director) campus
44 cafes and 0 showers

Student irony towards the very bad existing conditions

Welcome in Brovina (ex-director) campus
44 cafes and 0 showers

needing a pragmatic answer

Affording the situation

Government vision Competition program
1. Improvement of the student social life and dormitory physical conditions in CE Standards
2. Duplication of the student campus capacity (from 5 000 to 10 000)
3. Improvement of the financial performance of the Campus to achieve a less annual
Governmental funding and looking at other alternative financing and management
systems, for instance stimulating a mix of public-private

a project financing approach

investment through

Analysis

Square Demokracia
quite empty square
no transit ways
no quality facilities

Analysis

current functions
girls residential building
hotelier building
revitalized

boys residential building

multi functional
building

store,laundry,boilers
administrtion offices
library

canteen, cafeteria

family building

current situation 29 residential buildings and 7 service and administration buildings

Approach with illegal constructions

Approach with illegal constructions

Analyses current Campus data

Total area
= 215 230 ha (re-evaluated property boundary)
Base built area = 23 840 m2
Kut = 23 840 m2 / 215 230 m2 = 11% use of the territory
Total built area = 83 484 m3
Ki = 83 484 m2 / 215 230 m2 = 0.38 built intensity
Existing dormitory total built area =73 540 m2
Total existing rooms = 2424 rooms
Existing students = 2424 rooms x 2.5 student/room = aprox. 6 000 students
Theoretical students number after revitalization of the existing buildings =
= 2 424 rooms x 2 stud/room = 4 848 students
program target to be achieved 10 000 students

What to do with the existing buildings and how to

increase the student capacity in the campus?

Planning strategic approach

3 potential alternatives
Increasing the existing built intensity, preserving all the existing dormitory buildings.
Replacing all the existing buildings with new ones, well designed in a perfect master plan.
Thinking in a huge scale, but developing step by step.
1. Increasing the existing built intensity, preserving all the existing dormitory buildings.
It could be done making use of the existing voids in the between spaces.
What we benefit: We do not demolish the existing buildings and we save 60-100 /m2 as difference of reconstructing existing and
building new ones. Total difference= 73 540 m2 exist. dormitory buildings x 100 /m2 = 7 354 000 What we loose: We could not have a.
quality and fluid space interaction with other campus buildings and common spaces, b. quality public spaces, squares, etc, c. qualitative
dormitories performance, d. qualitative public facilities, e. functional services inside each building
2. Replacing all the existing buildings with new ones, well designed in a perfect master plan.
This alternative could strongly amplify the doubts, if it could ever happen or not. The cost of this venture is :
10 000 students to be housed x 24 m2 / student = 240 000 m2 x 550 /m2 = 132 000 000
30 000 m2 of public facilities and services x 650 /m2 = 19 500 000
Total funding = 151 500 000 + Existing building demolishing cost
What we benefit: We could potentially have a perfect functional and aesthetical student Campus design. What we loose: Demolishing the
existing buildings, we loose 60-100 /m2. Total difference= 73 540 m2 exist. dormitory buildings x 100 /m2 = 7 354 000
3. Thinking in a huge scale, but developing step by step based on financial and building capacity.
This alternative could be an intermediate approach, that embrace strongly the challenge of change with prudent, but secure steps.
What we benefit: We could potentially have a complex functioning as an organism with a. quality and fluid space interaction between
campus buildings and common public spaces, b. quality public spaces, squares, etc, c. qualitative dormitories performance, d. qualitative
public facilities, e. functional services inside each building, f. better land-use, etc. What we loose: Demolishing the existing buildings, we
loose 60-100 /m2, as difference of reconstructing existing and building new ones. Total difference= 49 104m2 exist. dormitory buildings
which could be demolished x 100 /m2 = 4 910 400
Preserving the some buildings, which better fit the existing urban context with the Master plan concept and affording the other part with the
change challenge.

Preserving a part of the existing Student City allow to :

1- To maintain even the public managing system within a potential private contribute in management
2 -To maintain a functional part of the campus working during the building construction
3- To preserve the historical memory of the Student City

Why we decide to preserve these buildings in west area?

1. Part of these buildings are already renovated.
2. The existing urban context is of potential organic integration with the new Master plan
3. The H shape buildings has the higher student capacity and have good orientation East-West for dormitories
4. The entrances of these existing buildings are well integrated with the urban context and West Student City access
5. Has the best potentiality for the adaption with the EU Regulation and fire protection and standards.

TIMING: Financing and Management Approach

phases

- Phase 0:
Public management,
insufficient quality and standards.

- Phase 3 :
North intervention could be a private
concessionary investment and managing
of dormitories, services and cultural facilities.
-Phase 1 West :
West intervention could be a Public investment
of reconstruction and revitalization of the existing
buildings.The managing could be public, with
differentiate offer regarding the different room typology.

- Phase 1 East:
Est intervention could be a private concessionary
investment and managing of dormitories,
services and cultural facilities.

- Phase 2 :
South intervention could be a
private concessionary investment and
managing of cultural and sport facilities
open even to the public.

DESIGN APPROACH

DESIGN APPROACH
SYNERGY OPEN TO THE CITY
Define a synergic territory for the new university campus that links and works with the surrounding areas creating
relevant public center for events for students and surrounded inhabitants
Connect to the Tirana Lake Park
It will embrace the meeting point for activities of the surrounded areas

DESIGN APPROACH
TERRITORIAL ENTITIES_CONTINUITY

DESIGN APPROACH
TERRITORIAL ENTITIES_INTERVENTION AREA

DESIGN APPROACH
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE FISRT _ pedestrian, cycling and
vehicular accessibility
Distribution system easy recognizable and immediately intuitive

EXISTING DIRECTIONS
Respect of local entities and visuals

COURTYARD VOLUMES_ Define large scale intervention

Four large volumes which shape derives from the lines

that belong to the urban context in particular from

the main direction north-south and the diagonal that from the entrance arrive to the core of the intervention
They are located in balance with the other building typologies in order to create different scale in the overall master plan : they become

catalyst, clearly visible from all part of the campus, with a courtyard typologies,

the groudfloor lifts itself to allow landscape passing through the volume, with public program on the ground, first/second floors; they
define an inner

intimate space but at the same time open and in continuity with the outer space.

LINEAR BUILDINGS_ Define small scale intervention

The main

two directions north-south and east-west define the road system that allow service accessibility for service and mezzi

di soccorso and parking location for workers and students. The intersection of these two directions create a grid on which are then developed the other buildings mainly used for accommodations.
These building typologies are oriented mainly to get the best east -west orientation for daylighting so the volumes are placed on the north south axis thus to create an open courtyard from one to the other building.

LANDSCAPE AND FACILITIES

Define

diffuse small scale building as icon in the landscape

LANDSCAPE AND FACILITIES

Landscape design

intersects the building design provoking mix of programmatic aspects

VOLUME WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE

SLA DESIGN

VOLUME WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE

SLA DESIGN
WEAVING TOGETHER BUILDING,
ACTIVITIES AND LANDSCAPE

VOLUME BLD

LINEAR BLD

open, flexible and made by sum of single interventions that along the
central north -south axis intersects east-west landscape strip directions that generate the program.
The Mastr plan use an approach

SCENARIOS FOR BUILDING INTERVENTION

Intervention defines different scenarios that can be developed in

phases and in time, depending on the economical capacity
The proposal within the context, clearly and functionally defines:
1. Building to be demolish : without building consistency and
impossible to be updated to EU regulation for economical reasons,
structural and mechanical aspects;
2. Building to be reconstructed according to the EU
standards on the energetic efficiency
3- Construction of new buildings according to the EU
standards and parameters to be implemented in different phases to
allow government management and without interrupt activities of the
student campus.

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
CURRENT SITUATION

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
DIVISION IN FUNCTIONAL LOTS

LOT 1

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
DIVISION IN FUNCTIONAL LOTS

LOT 2
LOT 1

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
DIVISION IN FUNCTIONAL LOTS

LOT 2
LOT 1
LOT 3

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
DIVISION IN FUNCTIONAL LOTS

LOT 4

LOT 2
LOT 1
LOT 3

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
CURRENT

CAMPUS AREA
BASE BUILT AREA
K ut

215.230 sqm
23.480 sqm

11%

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
PHASE 1
LOT 2

LOT 1

CAMPUS AREA
BASE BUILT AREA
K ut

215.230 sqm
29.351 sqm
13.6 %

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
PHASE 2
LOT 2

LOT 3

LOT 1

CAMPUS AREA
BASE BUILT AREA
K ut

215.230 sqm
32.527 sqm
15.1 %

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
PHASE 3
LOT 2

LOT 3

LOT 1

LOT 4

CAMPUS AREA
BASE BUILT AREA
K ut

215.230 sqm
39.950 sqm
18.5 %

PHASE IMPLEMENTATION
PHASE 4
LOT 2

LOT 3

LOT 1

LOT 4

CAMPUS AREA
BASE BUILT AREA
K ut

215.230 sqm
44.695 sqm
20.7 %

The Master plan raises relevant values as environmental

asset using the landscape as device and tool for designing.

The Master plan raises relevant values as environmental

asset using the landscape as device and tool for designing.

WELFARE and ENVIROMENTAL COMFORT

Views on the courtyard and on the landscape, together with the roof garden conceived as hortus
conclusus, lifted from the ground, replace the human

being in the center of an integrated architecture

within landscape and humanity which based its owen experience as subjective measure of buildings.
System of green courtyards

Valuing of landscape qualities

System of green roof gardens

LANDSCAPE AND OUTDOOR FACILITIES

The idea of creating inner communication path, within the greenery and pleasant to walk through, allows
to generate a space physically and psychologically in common for all users, from students to surrounded
inhabitants. This distribution space, fluid and continuous appears embracing many urban qualities: landscape,
piazza, are for meeting, communication and social relationships.

BUILDING ORIENTATION
The Intervention is placed into the context along North-South directions, finding deeply a dialogue between
interior and exterior perceptions of spaces: buildings are oriented in order to get the best sunlight
orientation, allowing student residences to face East and West.

Building Orientation and Solar Energy: Solar Thermal

Energy and Photovoltaic Field

ACCESSIBILITY_ PEDESTRIAN,CYCLING VEHICULAR ROUTE

The open space is crossed by road for services and cycling route that goes through all public scape thus to
connect accommodations to public amenities, arriving to the park.
Access point are clearly visible and parking area are located to the end of the main road system when intersect the
surround viability.
Pedestrian and Cycling Route

Parking

Public transport

BUILDING PROGRAM

The proposal define different building scale able to define mix of programs with an integrated approach using
several typologies and activities that links mutually to each others.

NEW INTERVENTION BUILDINGS _tyology

UNIT A - 50 sqm

UNIT C 90 sqm

2 bedrooms - 15.5 sqm each

4 bedrooms - 11.6 sqm each

1 kitchen - 7.5 sqm

1 kitchen - 26 sqm

1 toilet

2 toilet

UNIT B - 50 sqm

UNIT D 50 sqm

2 bedrooms

2 bedrooms - 18 sqm each

2 kitchen

1 kitchen - 5 sqm

2 toilet

2 toilet

+
UNIT E 25 sqm
1 bedroom - 13.7 sqm
1 toilet

NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LAYOUT_LINEAR BUILDING

Building 9
Surface floor - 1915 sqm
Number of residence floor - 5.5
Total - 10532 sqm

Building 18
Surface floor - 1680 sqm
Number of residence floor - 5.5
Total - 9240 sqm

NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LAYOUT_LINEAR BUILDING

Building 2

Building 1

Surface floor - 1100 sqm

Number of residence floor - 5
Total - 5500 sqm

Surface floor - 2000 sqm

Number of residence floor - 4.5
Total - 9000 sqm

Room Floor

Ground Floor

Ground Floor

NEW PUBLIC BUILDING LAYOUT_courtyhard typology

Ground Floor

NEW PUBLIC BUILDING LAYOUT_courtyhard typology

Room Floor

NEW PUBLIC BUILDING LAYOUT_courtyhard typology

Facilities Floor

PUBLIC BUILDING SECTION

MATERIAL AND TECHNOLOGY

The architectural proposal of the facadess treatment research a

simple architecture solution, at the same time balanced with a

contemporary language and careful aesthetic appearance, to achieve instances of energy and cost efficiency, ease of
maintenance. The need of demolishing a part of existing buildings addressed to choose a technology based on heat insulated facades, with
plaster finishing. This solution is closed to the typical architecture of the place and based on known technologies, but translated in a contemporary
thinking.

MATERIAL AND TECHNOLOGY

The architectural proposal of the facadess treatment research a

simple architecture solution, at the same time balanced with a

contemporary language and careful aesthetic appearance, to achieve instances of energy and cost efficiency, ease of
maintenance. The need of demolishing a part of existing buildings addressed to choose a technology based on heat insulated facades, with
plaster finishing. This solution is closed to the typical architecture of the place and based on known technologies, but translated in a contemporary
thinking.
The rhythm of the facades derives from the need of using a modular system based on different specific programs behind. There brise
soleil panels are placed on this texture with different sizes, which function is to protect the facades exposed to the sun and at the same time to give
privacy.

MATERIAL AND TECHNOLOGY

EXISTING INTERVENTION BUILDINGS _RECONSTRUCTION

Existing buildings problematics

1. Buildings not in accordance with CE standards.
Ratio sqm/student for dormitories
Fire protection measurements as CE standards
Wheelchair disabled people CE standards
Functional
Common showers
Common toilets
No kitchens
No common space for socializing
3. Energy inefficency
Lack of the wall thermic insulation
Soil water infiltrations in the ground floor
Bad insulations and degrading waterproofing
Very bad single glaze windows, coatings and frames
Very bad common and room spaces artificial lightening
Inefficient lightings
Noise pollution

EXISTING INTERVENTION BUILDINGS _RECONSTRUCTION

EXISTING INTERVENTION BUILDINGS _RECONSTRUCTION

INTERVENTION / NEW LAYOUT

Functional interventions
Intervention 1
Adaption of the existing rooms in better functional space, increasing the utility
space for student from 12 m2/student to 20 m2/student. Project foresees having
mainly (80%) double room students with the internal bathroom and 1 mini-kitchen
for 2 rooms (4 persons). One of the existing student rooms for each floor will be
transformed in common space for student socializing and relaxing.
Fire protection measurements as EU standards adding new fire stair blocks,
defining escape routes, automatic opening transversal corridor windows, hydraulic
measurements, etc.
Wheelchair disabled people EU standards. Designing dedicated rooms for each
floor, elevator for disabled people, etc.

INTERVENTION / PARAMETERS
existing

new

increase of
common space

EXISTING INTERVENTION BUILDINGS _RECONSTRUCTION

Building 24
Surface floor - 630 sqm
Number of residence floor - 3.5
Total - 2205 sqm

Ground Floor

Room Floor
UNIT PARAMETERS

REHABILITADED UNIT
48 sqm / 2 bedrooms / kitchen - 8 sqm /
toilet / 4 Students
UNIT LAYOUT
existing

rehabilitaded

Upper Room Floor

ENERGY EFFICIENCY INTERVENTIONS

MASTER PLAN PROPOSES INTERVENTIONS IN THE PRESERVED EXISTING BUILDINGS TO ACHIEVE
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE ENCOURAGING ENERGY AND RESOURCE-EFFICIENT BUILDINGS.
ACTION ON ADAPTATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS TO EU STANDARDS
ENERGY REGENERATION
Prefix that is necessary for a careful analysis of the status quo - energy audit and survey
thermographic.
Reference standard Italian (European Community)
-Law n.10/91 Rules for implementing the national energy plan in the field of rational use
of energy, energy saving and development of renewable energy
-D.P.R. n 412/1993, Regulations for the design, installation, operation and maintenance
of heating systems in buildings in order to control energy, in implementation of, article 4,
paragraph 4 of Law 9 January 1991, n.10

INTERVENTIONS ON THE BUILDING ENVELOPE

-Coat insulation of the facade
-Roof insulation
-Replacement of windows
-Brise soleil for south facade
INTERVENTION 1
Isolation coat external perimeter walls, performed with insulating expanded polystyrene, material with thermal conductivity value <0.039 W/mK.
Such as to achieve a transmittance average of the insulated walls to thermal bridge correctly U <0.26 W / m k.
Insulation of the floor towards unheated attic, performed with mineral fiber
panels <00:40 W / mk coupled panels in extruded polystyrene foam <0:35.
Average transmittance of the insulated floor U <0.16 W / m k.
Wall insulation to unheated stairwell with mineral fiber insulation plastered.

Existing roof slab situation

U value calculation
for Roof slab

U - W / mK . U = 1 / R

Cement mortar cover

Bituminous hydro isolation
Concrete slab
Plaster / mortar

U=1/

=0.17

-D.Lgs. 115/08 Implementation of Directive 2006/32 / EC on energy end-use efficiency

and energy sevices and repealing Directive 93/76 / EEC

INTERVENTIONS ON THE PLANTS

-New thermal power plants with condensing boilers and electric pumps with
variable flow
-Isolation of all connections of the plants
-Thermostatic valves and heat cost
-Solar thermal collectors for water health
-Solar thermal PV
INTERVENTION 3
Installation of a solar thermal plant for hot water
production, centralized type. The plant will consist of synthetically flat solar panels installed in
coverage; by an accumulation of domestic hot
water, a system of regulation and circulation installed in a special technical room former thermal power plant on the ground floor. The plant
will be able to cover 50% of primary energy.
As a part of this intervention will made a new
distribution of hot and cold domestic arrangement that can make applicable accounting for
each apartment.

-D.M. 26.06.09, National guidelines for energy certification of buildings

-D.P.R. 59/09 Regolamento di attuazione dellarticolo 4, comma 1, lettere a) e b), del
decreto legislativo 19 agosto 2005, n. 192, concernente lattuazione della direttiva
2002/91/CE sul rendimento energetico in edilizia

INTERVENTIONS ON THE BUILDING

Objectives of energy efficiency: it has been estimated that in the future a
variable percentage between 50 and 70% of the emissions reduction will be
obtained thanks to a process of energy efficiency of existing buildings.
With this action you can also introduce the energy ARCHITECTURAL
RENOVATION OF EXTERNAL FACES:
- New design of the facade
- External Frame for windows
- Redevelopment of balconies, terraces and parapets
- New paintwork and exterior finishes
- New descendants, gutters and flashings General

Installation of thermostatic valves and heat cost indirect individual terminal emission, so as to modulate the thermal demand based on the real
needs of the individual apartments.
Simultaneously account for consumption to adjust bills to pay and had
not established a quota based on thousandths, which does not reflect the
actual consumption.

R = 1 / 0.4 = 2.5 W / mK

Plaster (2cm ) / sand&cement mortar

Brick wall ( silicate brick)
Plaster ( 2 cm ) / sand&cement mortar

INTERVENTION 2

-D.Lgs. 311/2006, Corrective and supplementary provisions to Legislative Decree 19

August 2005, 192, implementing Directive 2002/91 / EC on the energy performance of
buildings

-D.M. 11/03/08, Implementation of Art. 24 paragraph 1 letter a) of Law 02.24.07 / 244 for
the definition of the limits of febbisogno annual primary energy and heat transfer for the
purposes of paragraphs 344 and 345 art. 1 of Law 27.12.06 / 296

INTERVENTION 4

R - mK / W . R = /

Outside Air , R=0.04

Cement mortar 6cm , =1.5
Bituminous hydro isolation 1cm,
Concrete slab 20cm , =1.9
Plaster 2 cm ,
= 0.9
Inside Air , R=0.13

-D.Lgs. 192/05 Implementation of Directive 2002/91 / EC on the energy performance

of buildings

Proposed solution

U value calculation
Replacement of single-galzed windows with high-performance
thermal
for Roof slab
aluminium/pvc frame and double safety glass filled with argon gas. Transmittance window U <1.6 W / m k.
finisher layer /
hydro isolation

FIRE REGULATION STANDARDS

R - mK / W . R = /

U - W / mK . U = 1 / R
Aquascud / hydro isolation
Thermal insulation/ esp + cement
Concrete slab
Plaster / mortar
New plaster / sand&cement mortar
Brick wall (existing silicate brick)
Plaster ( 1 cm ) / sand&cement mortar
Thermal insulation
Plaster ( 2 cm ) / sand&cement mortar

Outside Air , R=0.04

Hydro isolation 1cm , = 0.2
thermal isolation / ESP & cement 10cm,
Concrete slab 20cm , =1.9
Plaster 2 cm , = 0.9
Inside air , R = 0.13
U=1/

R = 1 / 2.01 = 0.50 W / mK

=0.06

INTERVENTION 5
Installation of new pumps with variable capacity, equipped with integrated
electronic regulation and programming. Electric energy efficient, able to
adapt to the changes required by the automatic prime hydraulic circuit,
which, through the risers, feeds the terminals with the new thermostatic
valves.

A staircase every 30 meters, maximum 15 meters escape, inserting external fire escapes
Evacuation plan with identification of safe places and widespread distribution of fire extinguishers (sprinklers impossible to do)
STANDARDS FOR DISABLES
Ramp access to the property
Possibility of parking adjacent rooms devoted to ground floor (5%)
Disabled toilets adjacent every public function
Corridors and lobbies appropriate, in accordance with lifts, stair lifts

CAMPUS STATISTICS
CAMPUS DIMENSIONS

SQM RESIDENCES

INTERVENTION AREA:

215.230 sqm

RESIDENCE:

187.233 sqm

SERVICES:

32.780 sqm

OPEN SPACES:
CAMPUS MOBILITY:
OUTDOOR PARKING:

45%

8%

153.080 sqm
13.200 sqm

37%

9.000 sqm

UNDERGROUND PARKING: 21.000 sqm

416.292 sqm

3%
5%

2%

BUILDING
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

TOTALSQM
9000
5500
11550
20850
6332
6332
7915
22920
10532,5
4980
3720
13625
1390
1390
3055
3055
3055
9240
2075

SQM SERVICES
BUILDING
20
21
22
23
24
25

TOTALSQM
7397,5
8257,5
1112
2444
3055
18450

SQM
SQM

187.230
146517

BUILDING
A
B
C
D
E
F
1
2
3
5
6
8
12
21
22
23
25

SQM

TOTALSQM
454
4152
5464
1757
730
200
2000
1100
2100
1583
1583
1910
1362,5
1345
278
611
6150

32780

CAMPUS STATISTICS - INVESTMENT COST ESTIMATION

MASTERPLANPHASE1 COST
Description
Revitalization of the existing dormitory buildings
Revitalization of the existing services and facilities
Building the new dormitory buildings (including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
Building new services and facilities (including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
PHASE 1 COST ESTIMATION 72 304 460
MASTERPLANPHASE2 COST
Description
Revitalization of the existing dormitory buildings
Revitalization of the existing services and facilities
Building the new dormitory buildings (including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
Building new services and facilities (including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
PHASE 2 COST ESTIMATION 22 695 450

MASTERPLAN PHASE 3 COST

Description
Revitalization of the existing dormitory buildings
Revitalization of the existing services and facilities
Building the new dormitory buildings (including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
Building new services and facilities(including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
PHASE 3COST ESTIMATION30 582 000
MASTERPLAN TOTAL COST
Description
Revitalization of the existing dormitory buildings
Revitalization of the existing services and facilities
Building the new dormitory buildings (including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
Building new services and facilities (including the demolition of the
existing buildings and new infrastructural + landscape works)
TOTAL COST ESTIMATION
125 581 910

Quantity in sqm
39 135
4 055

Price /sqm
480
550

Cost
18 784 800
2 230 250

82 747

580

47 993 260

5 071

650

3 296 150

Quantity in sqm
0
0

Price /sqm
480
550

Cost
0
0

18 450

580

10 701000

18453

650

11 994 450

Quantity in sqm
0
0

Price /sqm
480
550

Cost
0
0

46 900

580

27 202 000

5 200

650

3 380 000

Quantity in sqm
39 135
4 055

Price /sqm
480
550

Cost
18 784 800
2 230 250

148 097

580

85 896 260

28724

650

18 670 600

DESIGN TEAM

Arch. Rossana Atena, ATENASTUDIO Director

Team leader, Architect and Landscaper

Arch. Marco Sardella, ATENASTUDIO Director

Team leader, Architect, PhD Advanced technology

Arch. Arianna Marino

Architect, PhD Environmental Design

Arch. Mara Jos Jimnez Borja

Architect

Arch. Lorenzo Grussu

Architect

Eng.Andrea Atena

Forest Engineer

Eng. Stefania Rosani

Civil Engineer

Urb.Arch Ervin Tai, DEA Studio CEO

Team leader

Arch. Alket Meslani

Team leader

Arch. Klodiana Emiri

Architect

Arch. Klaudio Onuzi

Architect

Arch. Anisa Spahiu

Architect

Arch. Elda Kotorri

Architect

Arch. Aldo Hamzallari

Architect

Arch. Evis Laze

Architect

Eng. Sonila Sio

Structural Engineer

Eng.Mech. Spiro Drita

Mechanical Engineer

Eng.Elec. Deshira Mena

Electrical Engineer

Eng. Gerti Calliku

Structural Engineer

THANKS