A New Multi-Axial Failure Criterion For Concrete: M. Como R. Luciano
A New Multi-Axial Failure Criterion For Concrete: M. Como R. Luciano
A New Multi-Axial Failure Criterion For Concrete: M. Como R. Luciano
M. Como
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
R. Luciano
DiMSAT, University of Cassino, Cassino (Frosinone), Italy
ABSTRACT: In this paper, a new failure criterion for the concrete is developed. Cement, sand, aggregates
and water are mixed together and, after the setting, the cement paste binds aggregates and hardens to form
concrete. Experimentally, pores of different sizes are diffused in the hardened cement paste and micro stresses
arise in the neighborhood of the small pores when the concrete is loaded. The main idea of the proposed failure criterion is based on the assumption that the macroscopic concrete failure occurs when the maximum tensile stress, around the small pores reaches the local hardened cement paste tensile strength. The proposed
model explains many experimental phenomena as, for example, the different compression and tensile
strengths, the different crack geometries in the tension and compression failures and the experimental failure
contours under biaxial stress.
1 INRODUCTION
The research of a failure criterion for concrete under
multi-axial stresses is a very important task because
of its numerous civil engineering applications.
Nowadays, several concrete failure tests under multiaxial stresses are available and many theoretical
failure criteria have been proposed. These criteria,
on the other hand, have been formulated, as a rule,
by modifying failure conditions concerning other
materials, (e.g. the Coulomb criterion) to the concrete. Among all the criteria available in literature,
the Rankine criterion (Van Mier, 1997, Jirsek &
Bazant, 2001, McClintock & Argon, 1966) seems to
have a physical basis for the concrete. According to
this criterion, in fact, concrete fails in brittle manner
as soon as the maximum principal stress exceeds the
concrete tensile strength. It is well known, on the
other hand, that the strict application of the Rankine
criterion could imply that for a compressed concrete
specimen failure could never occur because no tensile stress develops. On the contrary, brittle failures
are ob-served also in compressive regimes. Tensile
stresses, in fact, can arise at microscopic level and
produce failures. The concrete is a multiscale material consisting of aggregates embedded in a matrix
of binder, the hardened cement paste (Van Mier,
1997). Further, the hardened cement paste is weakened by a capillary porosity, produced by evaporation of the water in excess. Diffused pores are visible with the electronic microscope: they have
irregular shape and are spread up among the needles
xp = K 2 xc ;
yp = K 2 yc ;
zp = K 2 zc
E p (1 2 2 ) Es2 Em Es Es E p + Em E p
=
1 s
Em
D
K 2m ,c =
(3a)
P
P
=
= A( ) zp
z
(3b)
(2)
27 15
3 + 15
, B ( ) =
,
2 (7 5 )
2 (7 5 )
3 15
C ( ) =
2 (7 5 )
A( ) =
K 2 = K 2p ,m K 2m,c
K
P
RR
=0
(1)
where:
p ,m
2
Nasser & Hori, 1999). If such a constraint is not satisfied, i.e. Ec and Em are chosen arbitrarily, the results obtained by using the proposed failure model
can be physically uncorrected since the elastic
moduli are meaningless. Therefore in eqs. (3a) and
(3b), concrete and mortar moduli will be suitably
chosen by using micromechanics and accurate test
results in order to effectively represent the elasticity
of the composite materials. Strong stress concentration occurs around the small cavities spread up inside the hardened cement paste. In order to define
these local stresses can be assumed that the mean
stress inside the hardened cement paste is the asymptotic stress acting at large distance from the single pore. Thus, when the concrete is, for instance,
axially loaded by the uniform stresses z, and the
mean stress zP takes place inside the hardened cement paste, by assuming for the pore a spherical
shape, the local stress around the cavity is
(McClintock & Argon, 1966):
at the pole Pz (see Fig.2):
2
Em (1 2 2 ) Eg Ec Eg Eg Em + Ec Em )
Ec
1 g
D
(2a)
(2b)
(4)
where indicates the local Poisson ratio of the hardened cement paste without pores, larger than the average Poisson ratio .
with:
D = Em2 (1 2 2 ) Eg Em (2 2 4 2 )
+ E (1 2 )
2
g
(2c)
P
P
z
P
E
y
Figure 2. Local stress around the spherical pore under an asymptotic compressive stress.
cz
tz
cz
(3a)
P = P = A( ) zP
z
RE = 0;
z
E = k B B( ) zP ; E = C ( ) zP
z
(3b)
(5)
(6)
(7)
and:
A( ) f rcc .un
kB =
B( ) f rtc
(8)
cz
(9)
where depends on the used restraint at the specimen boundary (Van Mier, 1997) and can be assumed
equal to 0,850,90. Further, the tensile concrete
strength f rtc can be evaluated in terms of the cylindrical compression strength f rcc with:
f rtc = f rcc
(10)
(11)
(14)
z = cz K 2 y = c y K 2 x = 0
(14)
P = [ A( )cz C ( )c y ]K 2
z
(12)
= [k B B( )cz A( )c y ]K 2
Py
c
2 rt
(13)
y = c y z = cz
P = [ A( )cz k B B ( )c y ]K 2
A( )
kB =
B ( )
p
rt ,loc
cy
(13)
= [C ( )cz A( )c y ]K 2
Py
(15)
P = [k B B( )cz C ( )c y ]K 2
x
P = [C ( )cz k B B( )c y ]K 2
x
P
= [ A( )cz C ( )c y ]K 2 = f rtp,loc , cz c y
z
= [ A( )c y C ( )cz ]K 2 = f rtp,loc , c y cz
Py
(16)
cz
(16)
ty
or:
cz +
C ( )
c y = f rcc ,un
A( )
C ( )
cz = f rc ,un
A( )
cy +
(17)
At the poles of the cavities diffused in the hardened cement paste we have the stresses
according to cz cy or cy cz.
P = K 2 [ A( )cz + k B B ( )t y ]
z
P = K 2 [ A( )cz + C ( )t y ]
z
yP
z
y
Px
= K 2 [ k B B( )cz + A( )t y ]
Py
Pz
Ey
Pz
Py
Px
Ez
P = K 2 [ k B B( )cz + C ( )t y ]
x
Ex
yP
P = K 2 [ C ( )cz + k B B( )t y ]
x
(18)
(19)
with:
f rcc ,un.biass =
(22)
Py
Px
Px
z
= K 2 [ C ( )cz + A( )t y ]
c
rc ,un
1 + C ( ) / A( )
(20)
(23)
or
f rcc .un
ty
f rtc
cz = f rcc .un
(24)
c y = f rcc .un
(24)
Py
z
y
Px
Pz
Ey
z = cz y = t y
Pz
Py
Px
Pz
xP
Ez
Ex
yP
(21)
The straight lines BP and AQ of Figure 12 represent the failure conditions (24) and (24) for the
compression- tension and tension- compression regimes. Thus, when a small lateral tensile component
is applied, the strength decreases significantly in the
compressive direction. When the two stresses with
opposite sign have the same intensity, as it occurs in
the case of pure shear (Fig.9),
z = or y = or
(25)
(30)
or,
C ( )t z + k B B ( )t y = f rtp,loc / K 2
(30)
or =
f rt ,un
(26)
1 + f rt ,un / f rc ,un
yP
z
y
Px
Pz
Ey
zP
Py
Px
zP
xP
Ez
Ex
Py
z = tz
y = ty
(27)
tz
ty
P = [ A( )t z + k B B( )t y ]K 2
z
P = [ A( )t z + C ( )t y ]K 2
z
= [k B B( )t z + A( )t y ]K 2
Py
Py
P = [k B B( )t z + C ( )t y ]K 2
x
P = [C ( )t z + k B B ( )t y ]K 2
x
ty +
C ( )
t z = f rtc
k B B ( )
t z = t y = tbiass
(31)
(31)
(29)
(32)
Thus we get:
tbiass =
= [C ( )t z + A( )t y ]K 2
C ( )
t y = f rtc
k B B( )
z = t z K 2 y = t y K 2
tz +
f rtc
C ( )
1+
k B B( )
(33)
REFERENCES
5 CONCLUSIONS
Figure 13 gives the biaxial failure contour for a concrete obtained experimentally by (Kupfer, 1973).
Other failure contours have similar behaviour (Van
Mier, 1997). It is immediate to recognize the essential good agreement of these test results with the
contours corresponding to the proposed failure
model of the concrete. In the compression compression regime, when the ratio between the two
principal stresses is about 0.5, the agreement is less
satisfying since in this case the test results seem to
be strongly influenced by the restraints used at the
specimen boundary, as shown in Figure 3.84 of (Van
Mier, 1997).
Figure 13. Failure surface of the concrete in biaxial stress conditions obtained by (Kupfer, 1973)