Sanders v. Lawrence et al Doc.

6
Case 5:06-cv-00280-HL-CWH Document 6 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION

:
GERALD RICARDO SANDERS, :
:
Plaintiff :
:
VS. : NO. 5:06-CV-280 (DF)
:
Officers FRANK DAY and GREG GAY, : PROCEEDINGS UNDER 42 U.S.C. §1983
and Police Chief KENT LAWRENCE, : BEFORE THE U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
:
Defendants : ORDER
____________________________________

Plaintiff GERALD RICARDO SANDERS, an inmate at Lee State Prison in Leesburg,

Georgia, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His application to proceed

in forma pauperis has been granted by separate order entered this date.

Plaintiff’s complaint arises out of an incident that occurred on the morning of September 2,

2004. According to plaintiff, a probationer, he was stopped that day in Eatonton, Georgia, by

defendant Officers Frank Day and Greg Gay, who apparently thought they saw a suspect leaving

plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff alleges that Officers Day and Gay pulled their guns on plaintiff, and that

Day reached into plaintiff’s car and grabbed plaintiff around his head. Fearing for his life, plaintiff

bit Day on the arm and tried to drive off. Day then sprayed plaintiff with pepper spray, possibly

after plaintiff was handcuffed. Plaintiff alleges that at the police station, Officers Day and Gay

alternately kicked plaintiff while he was handcuffed to the wall. Apparently, defendant Chief Kent

Lawrence was in the police station and heard plaintiff’s screams, but failed to intervene or later

investigate the matter.

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 5:06-cv-00280-HL-CWH Document 6 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 2 of 7

Plaintiff states that Officer Day later “falsified warrants” so that plaintiff’s probation would

be revoked and he would be returned to prison. According to plaintiff, Day further lied at plaintiff’s

probation revocation hearing. The charges against plaintiff were dismissed February 21, 2005, but

plaintiff’s probation was nevertheless revoked.

Plaintiff, a black male, suggests that race was a factor in the white defendants’ actions, and

notes that Officer Gay shot a black man in 2004. For the above alleged violations, plaintiff seeks

$5 million dollars in damages.

Although the Court has serious reservations as to the validity of certain of plaintiff’s claims,

see Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994), and Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 148 (1995), the Court will allow this case to go forward as to these

defendants.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that service be made as provided by law upon

defendants OFFICERS FRANK DAY and GREG GAY, and CHIEF OF POLICE KENT

LAWRENCE, and that they file a WAIVER OF REPLY, an ANSWER, or such other response

as may be appropriate under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and

the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

It is further ORDERED AND DIRECTED that a copy of this order be served upon

plaintiff’s custodian, if any.

DUTY TO ADVISE OF ADDRESS CHANGE

During the pendency of this action, each party shall at all times keep the Clerk of this court

and all opposing attorneys and/or parties advised of his current address. FAILURE TO

PROMPTLY ADVISE THE CLERK OF ANY CHANGE OF ADDRESS MAY RESULT IN

THE DISMISSAL OF A PARTY'S PLEADINGS FILED HEREIN!

2
 Case 5:06-cv-00280-HL-CWH Document 6 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 3 of 7

L DUTY TO PROSECUTE ACTION

Plaintiff is advised that he must diligently prosecute his complaint or face the possibility that

it will be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE for failure to

prosecute. Defendants are advised that they are expected to diligently defend all allegations made

against them and to file timely dispositive motions as hereinafter directed. This matter will be set

down for trial when the court determines that discovery has been completed and that all motions

have been disposed of or the time for filing dispositive motions has passed.

FILING AND SERVICE OF MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, DISCOVERY AND CORRESPONDENCE

It is the responsibility of each party to file original motions, pleadings, and correspondence

with the Clerk of court; to serve copies of all motions, pleadings, discovery, and correspondence

(including letters to the Clerk or to a judge) upon opposing parties or counsel for opposing parties

if they are represented; and to attach to said original motions and pleadings filed with the Clerk a

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE indicating who has been served and where (i.e., at what address), when

service was made, and how service was accomplished (i.e., by U. S. Mail, by personal service, etc.).

THE CLERK OF COURT WILL NOT SERVE OR FORWARD COPIES OF SUCH

MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, AND CORRESPONDENCE ON BEHALF OF THE PARTIES!

DISCOVERY

PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT COMMENCE DISCOVERY UNTIL AN ANSWER OR

DISPOSITIVE MOTION HAS BEEN FILED ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS FROM

WHOM DISCOVERY IS SOUGHT BY THE PLAINTIFF. THE DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT

COMMENCE DISCOVERY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS AN ANSWER OR DISPOSITIVE MOTION

HAS BEEN FILED. Once an answer or dispositive motion has been filed, the parties are authorized

to seek discovery from one another as provided in the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. The

deposition of the plaintiff, a state prisoner, may be taken at any time during the time period

hereinafter set out provided prior arrangements are made with his custodian.

3
 Case 5:06-cv-00280-HL-CWH Document 6 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 4 of 7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that discovery (including depositions and interrogatories) shall

be completed WITHIN 90 DAYS from the date of filing of an ANSWER or DISPOSITIVE

MOTION by the defendant(s), unless an extension is otherwise granted by the court upon a showing

of good cause therefor or a protective order is sought by the defendants and granted by the court.

This 90 DAY period shall run separately as to each plaintiff and each defendant beginning on the

date of filing of each defendant’s answer/dispositive motion. The scheduling of a trial herein may

be advanced upon notification from the parties that no further discovery is contemplated or that

discovery has been completed prior to the deadline.

DISCOVERY MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT.

NO PARTY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO ANY DISCOVERY NOT DIRECTED TO HIM OR

SERVED UPON HIM BY THE OPPOSING COUNSEL/PARTY! The undersigned incorporates herein those

parts of the Local Rules imposing the following limitations on discovery: except with written

permission of the court first obtained, INTERROGATORIES may not exceed TWENTY-FIVE (25) to

each party, REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS under Rule 34 of the

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE may not exceed TEN (10) requests to each party, and

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS under Rule 36 of the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE may not

exceed FIFTEEN (15) requests to each party. No party shall be required to respond to any such

requests which exceed these limitations.

REQUESTS FOR DISMISSAL AND/OR JUDGMENT

Dismissal of this action or requests for judgment will not be considered by the court absent

the filing of a SEPARATE MOTION therefor accompanied by a brief/memorandum of law citing

supporting authorities. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS should be filed at the earliest time possible, but

in any event no later than THIRTY (30) DAYS after the close of discovery unless otherwise

directed by the court.

4
 Case 5:06-cv-00280-HL-CWH Document 6 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 5 of 7
DIRECTIONS TO CUSTODIAN OF PLAINTIFF
Following the payment of the required initial partial filing fee or the waiving of the payment
of same, the Warden of the institution wherein plaintiff is incarcerated, or the Sheriff of any county
wherein he is held in custody, and any successor custodians, shall each month cause to be remitted
to the Clerk of this court twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to
plaintiff’s account at said institution until the $350.00 filing fee has been paid in full. In accordance
with provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, plaintiff’s custodian is hereby authorized to
forward payments from the prisoner’s account to the Clerk of Court each month until the filing fee
is paid in full, provided the amount in the account exceeds $10.00.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DIRECTED that collection of monthly payments from
plaintiff’s trust fund account shall continue until the entire $350.00 has been collected,
notwithstanding the dismissal of plaintiff’s lawsuit or the granting of judgment against him prior to
the collection of the full filing fee.

PLAINTIFF’S OBLIGATION TO PAY FILING FEE

Pursuant to provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, in the event plaintiff is hereafter
released from the custody of the State of Georgia or any county thereof, he shall remain obligated
to pay any balance due on the filing fee in this proceeding until said amount has been paid in full;
plaintiff shall continue to remit monthly payments as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Collection from the plaintiff of any balance due on the filing fee by any means permitted by law is
hereby authorized in the event plaintiff is released from custody and fails to remit payments. In
addition, plaintiff’s complaint is subject to dismissal if he has the ability to make monthly payments
and fails to do so.

ELECTION TO PROCEED BEFORE THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Under Local Rule 72, all prisoner complaints filed under provisions of 42 U.S.C. §1983 are
referred to a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for this district for consideration of all pretrial
matters. In addition, 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1) authorizes and empowers full-time magistrate judges to
conduct any and all proceedings in a jury or nonjury civil matter and to order the entry of judgment
in a case upon the written consent of all of the parties. Whether the parties elect to proceed before
a magistrate judge or retain their right to proceed before a U. S. district judge is strictly up to the
parties themselves.

5
 Case 5:06-cv-00280-HL-CWH Document 6 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 6 of 7

L After the filing of responsive pleadings by the defendants, the Clerk of court is directed to
provide ELECTION FORMS to the parties and/or to their legal counsel, if represented. Upon receipt
of the ELECTION FORMS, each party shall cause the same to be executed and returned to the Clerk’s
Office WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS. Counsel may execute ELECTION FORMS on behalf of their
clients provided they have such permission from their clients. However, counsel must specify on
the ELECTION FORMS on whose behalf the form is executed.
SO ORDERED, this 19th day of OCTOBER, 2006.

CLAUDE W. HICKS, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
 Case 5:06-cv-00280-HL-CWH Document 6 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 7 of 7

ADDENDUM TO ORDER

NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES

PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

SET OUT ABOVE, NO DISCOVERY SHALL BE PERMITTED IN THIS CASE

UNTIL AN ANSWER OR DISPOSITIVE MOTION (e.g., MOTION TO

DISMISS, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS) HAS BEEN FILED BY THE

DEFENDANT.

PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,

DISCOVERY (DEPOSITIONS, INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS, REQUESTS FOR

ADMISSIONS, ETC., AND RESPONSES THERETO) SHALL NOT BE FILED

WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. NOTE THAT THIS IS A CHANGE IN THE

PROCEDURE HERETOFORE FOLLOWED IN THIS DISTRICT.

DO NOT FILE ANY DISCOVERY WITH THE COURT UNLESS YOU

ARE SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED TO DO SO BY THE COURT OR UNLESS
FILING IS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT OR CONTEST A MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY, OBJECTION TO DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE
MOTION, OR SIMILAR MOTION. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO RETURN
ANY SUBMITTED DISCOVERY TO THE PARTY SUBMITTING IT UNLESS
IT IS FILED PURSUANT TO AN ORDER OF THE COURT OR IN SUPPORT
OF A MOTION TO COMPEL, OBJECTION TO DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE
MOTION, OR SIMILAR MOTION.