Policy: CEAND Poverjt

~~~=CEAND POVERJtm~MV
SEP 2 2 1998
MANFRED ZELLER AND MANOHAR SHARMA
INT. FG0v POUCY
FOOD
POLICY
STATEMENT
NUMBEilll, SEPTEMBER 1998
n many developing countries, poor rural households face se~&~ cf>d~itJiliifQ)ten

they seek credit from formal lending institutions. Formal financial services such as
those offered by banks are often not available to those below the poverty line because
of restrictions requiring that loans be backed by collateral. Nor do banks welcome
the small amounts the poor want to save. As a result, the poor usually turn first to informal
sources such as friends, relatives, or moneylenders, who loan small amounts for short periods, or to informal, indigenous institutions such as savings clubs and lending networks to
borrow enough to purchase food and other basic necessities. These informal networks are
frequently successful in tiding the poor over difficult times, such as a bad harvest, and they
enable poor households to build up savings for investments that can help lift them out of
poverty.
A recent Food Policy Report, Rural Finance and Poverty Alleviation, by Manfred Zeller
and Manohar Sharma, examines the lessons that rural financial institutions such as banks
and cooperatives can learn from the informal lending sector. It also considers the roles government should play in the provision of financial services. The report's findings are gleaned
from a series of detailed household surveys conducted in nine countries of Asia and Africa:
Bangladesh, Cameroon, China, Egypt, Ghana, Madagascar, Malawi, Nepal, and Pakistan.
Most of the poor in these countries could benefit from credit, savings, and insurance services, but what is available varies greatly from country to country.
LESSONS TO BE LFARNED FROM INFORJ"AI I
NOFRS
n looking at the lessons that can be learned from studying the relationship between informal lenders and their poor clients, the report finds the following: ( 1) A credible longterm relationship is the key to enforcing loan repayment: the borrower will repay the loan if
he or she expects to be able to borrow again in the future. (2) Financial services should be
tailored to the demand patterns of the borrowers. For example, farm loans that can only be
used for seeds or fertilizer reduce the flexibility of the household to make the best use of the
loan. (3) Decisionmaking on loans granted should be made at the local level. (4) Institutions
ought to have clear plans for loan recovery before lending begins. (5) Group-based transactions hold promise, but more research is needed to compare group lending and saving activities with other member-based institutions such as credit unions and village banks.
(6) Saving services should be provided. (7) Incentives for managers of rural financial programs should be built into the programs.
2013 K STRffT, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. .200()6.1002
USA.
PHONE: 1202-8625600
FAX: 1202..f67-Hl9
EMAIL: II'PRI@CCNET.COM
WEB:"WWw.CGIAR.ORC/ IFPRJ
INNOVATIONS KEY Tn FlNANCIAl SERVICES
OR THE
POOR
n recent years, micro finance institutions designed to serve the poor, such as the Gramecn
Bank in Bangladesh, have received wide attention, but these institutions depend on subsidies from national governments and international donors. Zeller and Sharma argue that
these subsidies represent good investments of public funds on two counts: they enable services to be offered that the marketplace is not willing to provide on its own, and they have
been proven to alleviate poverty.
Although excessive government

interference and rigid regulations have
suppressed innovation in financial
services, liberalization of financial
markets alone has not been able to trigger the kinds of innovation that reduce
transaction costs for the poor. Rural financial markets in developing countries have inherent problems that make
investments risky and costly: clients
ACCESS TO CREDIT OR
PARTIC IPATION IN A CREDIT
PROGRAM POSITIVELY
AFFECTED HOUSEHOLD
INCOME IN FOUR OUT OF FIVE
COUNTRIES ASSESSED
are too scattered, rural clients all want

to borrow at the same time (in the preharvest season) and to save immediately after the harvest, and the poor
own few assets to secure loans.
Private-sector financial institutions
are reluctant to take on these risks. In

the long run, however, innovations
that improve the usefulness of these
institutions to the rural poor will also
improve the efficiency and sustainability of rural financial programs.
POOR HOUSEHOLDS STRIVE TO

REPAY LOANS SO THAT THEY
WIL L BE ABLE TO BORROW
ANOTHER TIM E.
PUBLIC INVESTMENT PAYS OFF
illce the market, by itself, has not

U been able to stimulate much institutional research and experimentation
in rural areas, public support in the
development phase is critical. "Once viable prototypes are identified, they will
eventually be adopted by the private
sector," the report says. "Well-directed
support to promising microfmance institutions is likely to have payoffs in both
services to the poor and reduced costs of
services in the long run."
Access to credit or participation
in a credit program positively affected
household income in four out of five
countries assessed, the report finds.
Households with improved access to
credit were also better able to adopt
technology; they spent more on food
and, in some cases, had higher calorie
intakes. Access to financial services
__________________
._,_,__
improves the incomes of and opportunities for the rural poor, and provides
support to tide families over difficult
times. And poor households strive to
repay loans so that they will be able to
borrow another time.
But, for the poorest of the poor,
the report indicates that financia l services must be offered in combination
with other programs such as training in
basic literacy, enterprise management,
and education in nutrition, health, and
family planning.
The report makes a strong case for
strengthening rural financial markets
through appropriate public intervention. In the long run, public investment
in institutional innovations will pay
off in efficient microfinance institutions that offer full-fledged savings
and credit services to the rural poor.
___________ _
Please send the Food Policy Report Rural Finance and Poverty Alleviation, by Manfred Zeller and Manohar Sharma.
Name
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organization--------------------------------------------------------------------------Address
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The report will be sent free of charge by surface airlift. Please allow 3-4 weeks for delivery.

Policy: CEAND Poverjt

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Policy: CEAND Poverjt

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Policy: CEAND Poverjt

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

~~~=CEAND POVERJtm~MV

MANFRED ZELLER AND MANOHAR SHARMA

INT. FG0v POUCY

n many developing countries, poor rural households face se~&~ cf>d~itJiliifQ)ten

LESSONS TO BE LFARNED FROM INFORJ"AI I

INNOVATIONS KEY Tn FlNANCIAl SERVICES

Although excessive government

are too scattered, rural clients all want

are reluctant to take on these risks. In

POOR HOUSEHOLDS STRIVE TO

PUBLIC INVESTMENT PAYS OFF

illce the market, by itself, has not

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.