DETAILED PROCEDURE

OF
TECHNICAL SAFETY
AUDIT

Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority

Bhangagarh, Guwahati-781005

STATFED BUILDING, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI-781005

Website: www.gmda.co.in
E-mail: ceo_gmda@yahoo.com

NO. GMDA/GEN/16/09 (Part-2)/63

Tel: 0361-2529650/9824
Fax: 0361-2529991

Dated: 31st January 2012

PUBLIC NOTICE FOR TECHNICAL SAFETY AUDIT

This is for information of all concerned that Section 58.20 (iii) of the Building Byelaws
requires that all public and apartment building of height above 12 m required records of
construction at plinth level, 1st storey, middle storey in case of multistory building and last
storey in addition to other tests, reports on construction the details of which and procedure,
formats etc. are available in Chapter VI of the Building Byelaws which may also be seen in our
website www.gmda.co.in .
Authority now proposes to check randomly some such buildings to examine if this
provision is complied with and if not will conduct its own assessment through our appointed
firm and the expenditure will be realized from the defaulting parties with immediate effect.
The details of expenditure that the defaulting parties/developers may have to be incurred are
being made available in our website along with the other detailed procedure of the audit
within 48 hours of publication of this notice. The parties/builders are free to conduct the
examination by themselves also as per the detailed procedure made available in our website
and submit the result to Authority. However the self-assessment is required to be completed
within one month from updating the detailed procedure in our website.
All concerned of these buildings are also required to keep the documents/test report
etc. required at site and should make available these documents and all other information
related to the construction to the firm engaged by Authority and staffs of the Authority as and
when they visit the site for inspection. The report and corrective measures, if required will be
made available to the concerned parties for necessary corrective measures from their end.
Any willful obstruction or refusal to make available documents for inspection by our
appointed firms/staffs of GMDA may invite subsequent action from GMDA.

Sd/(Dr. M. Angamuthu, IAS)

Chief Executive Officer
Guwahati Metropolitan Dev. Authority
Bhangagarh, Guwahati-5

DETAILED PROCEDURE OF TECHNICAL SAFETY AUDIT

SCOPE OF TECHNICAL SAFETY AUDIT
Technical Safety Audit will be conducted in two phases as given below:
The Technical Safety Audit will be done for Existing and under construction
building, above (G+2) within Guwahati Metropolitan area in following manners.
Buildings forwarded for Technical Audit from time to time provided that if private
parties/developers/owners approach the concerned Firm/Institution for such audit they
will do the technical audit and submit a report to GMDA also.

(1)

PHASE - I
The Technical Audit is a purely technical achievement where technically
sound personal/ Experienced Civil Engineer of EREC TEAM will conduct the audit
with a few handheld equipments in following steps :
Step-I:

Keen observations shall be done for RVS only by Erec Team Member
(ETM). During Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) period, photographs also
have to be taken for further analysis & identification of the building.
The visible defects/ damages, disorder and any infirmity have to be
keenly observed and list out. Laptop will be used as record media for
collected data and photographs.

Step-II:

The NDT equipment Schmidt Hammer is to be applied if required to

check the quality of concrete used in the building.

Step-III:

Built-up area and height of the building shall be measured and recorded.

Step-IV:

Design of structure (if available) and/or building permission will be

verified with the compliance of actual structure of the building by the
ETM.

Step-V:

For under construction building, quality of materials used has to be

checked and Inform to builder to check the progress work to get the
earthquake resistance standard/ safety so that, if any anomaly found,
retrofitting can by done immediately. Subsequently, the records
submitted to the concern authority i/e 1st party.

Step-VI:

The technical report (Phase-1) will be prepared within 7 (seven) days

from the date of completion of field works and submit the same to the
1st party.
This Phase-I study will cover following:
(i) Technical Audit as per model Performa for technical audit enclosed
at Annexure-VII of all buildings under construction.
(ii) Structural inspection report as per Annexure-VIII of all completed
buildings.
(iii) The above requirements to be supported with-

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 1

(a) Photograph of the building as completed/under construction as

on date of inspection.
(b) A detailed inspection report along with plan showing the
construction carried out in site plan of the plot.
(iv) In addition to above the Rapid Visual Screening of building as per format
at Annexure-X or any other method also can be used.
(v) Recommendation based on above study for each building.
(a) Recommendation will mainly focused on the structural safety
assessment of each building examined and suggest corrective/
remedial measures, if any.
(b) It will also recommend if further NDT is recommended and reasons
for which the NDT recommended and such test is required to be
conducted.
(c) If however as per the Phase-I study, no further structural assessment
and audit is recommended for any building the same also be pointed
out by concern experts.
(vi) Report should consist of (1) Field data (Software operated), (2) Few
photographs, (3) Analysis and expert view. All report and documents
shall be in English with 3 (three) hard copies and 1 (one) soft copy.

(2)

PHASE-II

After recommendation of Technical Safety Audit and structural inspection in

phase-I Non-Destructive Testing service may have to be done for checking overall
quality & safety of buildings with the help of NDT equipments. Accordingly, the
data shall be sorting & analyze for proper identification of weakest points and
safety level of the building that Retrofitting can be done as the remedial measures
taken by the owner of the building. However the consultancy of retrofitting is not
covered within the scope of this proposal.
In case of under constructed building, the Technical audit shall be in phase
manner. The NDT equipments are also applicable in this type of audit.
(i)

The function and features of usable NDT equipments in both new and
existing building are summarized as follows.
a)

Pile Integrity Test: Pile Integrity Testing (PIT) is a Non-Destructive

Testing equipment shall be used for Technical Audit of foundation of
the building specially for pile foundation whereas the parameters like
Length of the Pile, Quality of pile, any Crack, break, voids inside the
pile etc. can be determined.

b)

Rebar Detection: The compact, lightweight Profometer 5+ rebar

detection equipment shall be used to detect the position of Rebar
(Reinforcement), Concrete Coverage, Span and diameter of rebar.

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 2

(ii)

c)

Corrosion Analyzing: The Canin+, the corrosion analyzing instrument

shall be used for assessment of conductivity of concrete and presence
of corrosion of steel inside concrete.

d)

Ultrasonic Crack detector: Tico- is an ultrasonic instrument shall be

used to detect the uniformity of concrete, cavities, cracks and
defects, the modulus of elasticity and compressive strength.

e)

Compressive Strength of Concrete (Quality Test):

The Schmidt
Hammer (Digi-Schmidt) is one of the modern & sophisticated nondestructive Testing equipment shall be used to determine the
compressive strength of any type of concrete. It is also the prime
equipment for evaluating the quality of concrete.

Basic Technical Requirement and Specification

a)
Nature of Technical Safety Audit: Nature of audit will be the technical
safety audit of all Ground+2 R.C.C. buildings and above both
completed and under construction allowed by GMDA and GMC from
year 2002.
b)

To use up-to-date technical machinery and know how without

damaging existing buildings

c)

The firms/institutions should have technical knowledge, adequate

qualified technical manpower and equipment for conducting such
safety audit.

The consultant may also suggest and engage any other method as may be
suitable to arrive at a definite conclusion with prior approval of Second
Party.
Recommendation based on the NDT and testing report should consist of the
report of over all quality of the building indicating the weakest points for
safety and prospective remedial or retrofitting measures for sound
condition. All report and documents shall be in English with 3 (three) hard
copies and 1 (one) soft copy.
(iii)

Test data Collection and record: Before testing the work piece (RCC
Building), the test point shall be prepared by rubbing and cleaning that
actual data can be obtain by applying the NDT equipments. The test data
shall be properly collected by equipment automatically and subsequently
manually recorded. Further, the data shall be sorted and categorized for
preparation of Technical audit report.

(iv)

Technical Audit Report: A Structural Inspection report (Phase II) shall be

prepared performing the Non Destructive Testing of the building. This
report consist of categorized Test data, Photographs of the building along
with the expert view (suggestion) and shall be submitted to GMDA (First
Party).

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 3

(3)

Quality Assurance Plan:

The firms should have to ensure quality of assurance in his work. A team
from GMDA will continually check the work and may suggest additional
requirement/information as per checking, if required.

Selected Firms:

(1)

Authority has selected Environmental Research and Evaluation Centre, MPG

Complex, R-2, Rupnagar, Guwahati-781032 through a transparent bidding
process
for
the
work
Contact
No.
0361-2525437,
Email
mpguw2@rediffmail.com.
Details of rates of the firm accepted by the Authority may be seen at Annexure-XI
& XII. Provided that in case of individual party/owner/developer approach the
Firm directly for such audit the payment will then be made by these parties
directly to the Firm.

(2)

Provided that individual parties/owner/developer may conduct the

technical safety audit through IIT, Guwahati, Assam Engineering College and
Assam Engineering Institute, Chandmari who are already authorized by
GMDA for 3rd party checking of Structural Designs/Structural Design Basic
Report (SDBR). However, fee for the Technical Safety Audit will be borne by
the concerned developer/owner.

(3)

The fee can also be negotiated considering the complexity and magnitude
by the client and the firm/institution between them.

These institutions are however free to conduct the audit as per their own
format but the recommendations should be in the form as per the requirement
given by us for phase-I & II as the case may be.

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 4

ANNEXURE- VII
(For buildings under construction)
MODEL PROFORMA FOR TECHNICAL AUDIT REPORT
1. Design
1.1
1.2

1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6

Design / Drawings available

Design Category
Type Design?
Specific design?
Drawings prepared / checked by competent
Authority ?
Design Drawings / details
Structural detailed included
Earthquake / cyclone resistant features included?
Design verified / vetted by Dept. / Govt.
approved agency / competent authority?
Design changes approved by Dept. / Govt.
approved agency / competent authority?

COMMENTS
Y/N
Y/N
Design to be
collected to refer to
Design Consultant /
H.O.
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N

2. Foundation
2.1
Foundation used
2.2.1 If existing foundation used
2.2.1 Depth of foundation below ground
2.2.2 Type of foundation
2.2.3 Thickness of masonry (above ground)
2.2.4 Mortar used and Mix of cement mortar
1:4/1:6/Leaner
2.2.5 Grade of concrete (M20)
2.2.6 Height up to Plinth
2.2.7 If stone masonry
2.2.7.1 Through Stones
Inadequate
2.2.7.2 Corner Stones
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4

If new foundation used

Depth of foundation below ground
Type of foundation
Thickness of Masonry above plinth
Mortar used and Mix of cement mortar

2.3.5 Grade of concrete (M20)

2.3.6 Height up to Plinth

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Existing/New
: <50cm/50-70/>70cm
: Isolated/Combined/Raft/Piled etc.
:
: Cement-Sand/Lime and
: Y/N
: ________________ cm
: Yes/No, if Yes Adequate /
: Yes/No, if Yes
Adequate/Inadequate
: _____ <50/50-70/>70cm
: Isolated/Combined/Raft/Piled etc.
: ____________________________
(1:4): Cement sand/lime/mud and
Y/N
:Y/N
: <60/>60cm

Page No.: 5

2.3.7 If stone masonry

2.3.7.1 Through Stones
2.3.7.2 Corner Stones

Vertical reinforcement in foundation

Walling

3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.8.1
3.8.2
3.9

Type of masonry
Mortar used
Mix of cement mortar
Thickness of wall
Mixing of mortar
Joint Property filled
Wetting of bricks
If stone masonry
Through Stones
Corner Stones
Overall workmanship

Yes/No, if Yes
Adequate/Inadequate
Yes/No, if Yes
Adequate/Inadequate
Yes/No

: Brick/PCC Blocks/ Stone

: Cement Sand/Lime
: 1:4/1:6/Leaner
: >23cm/23cm/23cm
: OK/Not OK
: OK/NOT OK
: Good/ Medium/ Poor
: Yes/No
: Yes/No
: Good / Medium / Poor

Roofing

4.1
4.2
tiles
4.3
4.4
4.5

Type of roof
If sloped

Materials

5.1

Cement
5.1.1 Source
5.1.2 Type of cement
5.1.3 If OPC

: Authorized Dealer/ Market

: OPC/PPC/PSC
: Grade (33/ 43/ 53)

5.2

Sand
5.2.1 Type of sand
5.2.2 Presence of deleterious materials

: River sand / Stone dust

: Mild / Moderate/ High

5.3

Coarse Aggregates
5.3.1 Type coarse Aggregates
5.3.2 Presence of deleterious material

: Gravel/ Crushed Stone

: Mild/ Moderate / High

5.4

P.C.C. Blocks (Applicable for onsite production)

5.4.1 Type of P.C.C. Blocks
: Solid blocks/Hollow blocks

Purlins
: Angle-Iron / Timber / NA
Truss type : _______________________
Anchorage with wall
: Adequate/ Inadequate/ NA

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

: Flat/Sloping
: A.C. sheet/ G.I. sheet /Morbid

Page No.: 6

5.4.2 Ratio of concrete in blocks

5.4.3 Interlocking feature
5.4.4 Course aggregates used

: __________________
: Yes/No
: Natural/ Crushed stone

Bricks Blocks, Stone etc.

5.5.1 Strength (field assessment)
5.5.2 Dimensional accuracy

: Low/Medium/High
: Yes/No

5.6

Concrete
5.6.1. Mix of concrete
5.6.2 Batching
5.6.3 Compaction
5.6.4 Workability
5.6.5 Availability of water
5.6.6 Curing

: M20/Design Mix
: Weigh batching/Volume batching
: Vibrators/Thappies and rods
: Low / Medium / High
: Optimum/Sufficient / Insufficient
: Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory.

5.7

Reinforcing Steel
5.7.1 Type of Steel
5.7.2 Source
5.7.3 Whether IS marked
5.7.4 Conditions of bars
5.7.5 Fixing of reinforcement
as per drawing
5.7.6 Suitable cover
5.7.7 Spacing of bars
5.7.8 Overlaps as per specifications

5.5

5.8

Form Work
5.8.1 Type of Form Work
5.8.2 Use of mould oil
5.8.3 Leakage of cement slurry

5.9

Source
5.9.1 Cement
5.9.2 Sand
5.9.3 Coarse Agg.
5.9.4 Bricks
5.9.5 PCC blocks.

Seismic resistance features

6.1 Masonry Structures

: Plain mild steel/HYSD bars

: Authorised Dealer/Market
: Yes/No
: Clean/Corroded
: Yes/No
: Yes/No
: Regular/Irregular
: Yes/ No
: Timber / Plyboard/ Steel
: Yes/No
: Observed/Not observed

6.1.1 Provision of bands at Provided Adequate

6.1.1.1 Plinth level
Yes/No
6.1.1.2 Sill level
Yes/No
6.1.1.3 Lintel level
Yes/No
6.1.1.4 Roof level (if applicable)
Yes/No

Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No

6.1.2 If sloped Roof, whether seismic bands are provide at

6.1.2.1 Gable wall top
Yes/No
Yes/No

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 7

6.1.2.2 Eaves level

Yes/No

Yes/No

6.1.3 Provision of vertical steel in masonry at Provided Adequate

6.1.3.1 Each corner
Yes/No
Yes/No
6.1.3.2 Each T-junction
Yes/No
Yes/No
6.1.3.3 Each door joint
Yes/No
Yes/No
6.1.3.4 Around each window
Yes/No
Yes/No
6.1.4 Openings
6.1.4.1 Total width of openings
: <50%/50*-60%/>60%
(*-42% for double storey)
6.1.4.2 Clearance from corner
: OK/Not OK
6.1.4.3 Pier width between two openings
: OK/Not OK
6.2

Framed Structures
6.2.1 Ductile detailing
6.2.1.1 Spacing of stirrup
6.2.1.2 Sizes of members
6.2.1.3 End anchorage
6.2.1.4 Lapping (length, location etc.)
6.2.1.5 Angle of stirrup hook

: OK/Not OK
: OK/Not OK
: OK/Not OK
: OK/Not OK
: 90 / 135 degrees

6.3 Any testing carried out by Owner/Engg. Supervisor on

Testing done Testing results
6.3.1 Water
6.3.2 Cement
6.3.3 Bricks/PCC blocks/Stones
6.3.4 Aggregate
6.3.5 Mortar
6.3.6 Concrete
6.3.7 Reinforcement

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No

OK/Not OK
OK/Not OK
OK/Not OK
OK/Not OK
OK/Not OK
OK/Not OK
OK/Not OK

Page No.: 8

ANNEXURE- VIII
(For completed buildings)
STRUCTURAL INSPECTION REPORT
(This form has to be completed by registered Structural Designer after his site
Inspection and verification regarding compliance of all recommendation by the
owner, which in the opinion of the registered structural designer are necessary
for safety of the structure)
I.

Description by title and location of the property including T.P.No., F.P.No.

etc.

II.

Name of the present owner :

III.

Description of the structure :

Class I or Class II (Briefly describe the property in general and the structure
in particular)

(a) Function
Residen
ce
(with or
without
shops
1
A. Load
bearing
masonry
wall
construction
B. Framed
structure
Construction
Construction
and
structural
materials

IV.
V.
VI.

Critical
load
bearing
element
Roof
Floor

Office
Bldg.

Shopping
Centre

Brick

RCC

Stone

Timber

Steel

RCC

Timber

RBC

Steel

Jackarch

Audit
oria

Facto
ry

Year of construction
Year of subsequent additions or rectifications (Please
describe briefly the nature of additions or rectifications). :
Date of last inspection report filed : Last filed by whom:
(This does not apply to the first report).
Soil on which building is founded :
i)
Any change subsequent to construction
ii)
Nearby open excavation
iii)
Nearby collection of water

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

(b) Framed construction

School,
Hostel
College

Apartme
nts
(with
or
without
shops
3

:
:
:

Page No.: 9

iv)
v)
vi)
vii)

proximity of drain
underground water-tank
R.W. Pipes out-lets
Settlements

:
:
:
:

VII.

The Super-structure (R.C.C. Frame structure)

I) Crack in beam or column nature and extent of crack:
probable causes.
ii) Cover spell
:
iii) Exposure of reinforcement
iv) subsequent damage by user for taking pipes,
:
conduits, hanging, fans or any other fixtures, etc.:
vi) Crack in slab
:
vii) Spalling of concrete or plaster of slab
:
viii) Corrosion of reinforcement
:
ix) Loads in excess of design loads
:

VIII

The Super-Structure
(Steel Structure)
I) Paintings
:
ii) Corrosion
:
iii) Joint, nuts, bolts, rivets, welds, gusset plates
:
iv) Bending or buckling of members
:
v) Base plate connections with columns or pedestals :
vi) Loading
:

IX.

The Super-Structure (Load bearing masonry structure)

Cracks in masonry walls)
(Please describe some of the major cracks, their nature,:
extent and location, with a sketch, if necessary.

X.

Recommendations if any :
This is to certify that the above is a correct representation of facts as given
to me by the owner and as determined by me after Site Inspection to the
best of my ability and judgment.
The recommendations made by me to ensure adequate safety of the
structure are compiled with by the owner to my entire satisfaction.
(Signature of the Registered Structural Engineer)
Date:______________________________________
Name of the registered structural Engineer:
Registration No.
Address:

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 10

ANNEXURE-X
Rapid Visual Screening of Indian Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards
Seismic Zone - V
Building Name: _______________________
Use: ________________________________
Address: ____________________________
____________________________________
Elevation to Scale

Pin: _________________
Other Identifiers: ______________________
No. of Stories: ________________________
Year Built: _________________
Total Floor Area (sq.m.): ________________

PHOTOGRAPH

Plan to Scale
OCCUPANCY
Resi: Ord/Imp.
School
Health
Assembly Office
Commercial
Historic
Emer. Service
Industrial

SITE
Max. Number of Persons
High W.T. (within 8 m)
0-10 11-0 1-100 > 100 Liquefiable (if sandy soil)
Residents________
Land Slide Prone
Floating_________
Chimneys

Probable Maximum Grade of Damage

Building Masonry Building
Type
A, A+
B, B+
C, C+
Damage
grade in
Zone V

RC or Steel Frame Building

C, C+
D
E, E+

FALLING HAZARD

Parapets Cladding Other

URM
infill

Wood

Note: +sign indicates higher strength hence somewhat lower damage expected than stated. Also average
damage in one building type in the area may be lower by one grade point than the probable maximum indicated.
Surveyor will identify the Building Type, encircle it, also the corresponding damage grade and tick mark the
Recommendation.
Recommended Action:
1)

2)
3)

A, A+ or B, B+ : evaluate in detail for need of

reconstruction or possible retrofitting to achieve
type C or D.
C, C+ : evaluate in detail for need of retrofitting to
achieve type D.
URM infill : evaluate for need of reconstruction or
possible retrofitting to level D

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Surveyors Signature:______________________

Name:__________________________________

Page No.: 11

ANNEXURE-XI
SCHEDULE OF SUMMARY PRICE PROPOSAL
FOR PHASE-I
RATE SUBMITTED BY ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & EVALUATION CENTRE (EREC), GUWAHATI
Sl. No.

Name of Activities

1.

Technical Audit as per

Annexure-VII
(a) For buildings above
G+2 up to a height of
15.8 m. from ground
level
(b) For buildings above
height 15.8 m from
ground level

Unit (Per Sq.m.

of building slab)
(a) Upto 5000
sq.m.

Amount (In `)
In figures
In words
9,000.00
Rupees Nine
Thousand only
18,000.00

Rupees Eighteen
Thousand only

19,000.00

Rupees Nineteen
Thousand only

20,000.00

Rupees Twenty
Thousand only

(a) Upto 5000

sq.m.

8,000.00

(b) 5001-15000
sq.m.

9,000.00

Rupees Eight
Thousand only
Rupees Nine
Thousand only

(b) 5001-15000
sq.m.

(c) 15001-25000
sq.m

(d)Above 25000
sq.m.
2

Structural Inspection
Report as per AnnexureVIII
(a) For buildings above
G+2 up to a height of
15.8 m. from ground
level
(b) For buildings above
height 15.8 m from
ground level

(c) 15001-25000
sq.m

10,000.00

Rupees Ten
Thousand only

11,000.00

Rupees Eleven
Thousand only

(d)Above 25000
sq.m.

(Rates include service tax and other taxes as applicable)

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 12

ANNEXURE-XII
SCHEDULE OF SUMMARY PRICE PROPOSAL
FOR PHASE-II
RATE SUBMITTED BY ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & EVALUATION CENTRE (EREC), GUWAHATI
Sl.
No.

Name of
Activities

Name of test
required

Extent of
Scope

Unit

1.

Pile

Pile Integrity Test

2.

Foundation
Structure

3.

RCC structure
from plinth to
first floor

4.

RCC structure
from first floor
to 5th floor

5.

RCC structure
from fifth floor
to above

RCC reamed
pile with or
without bulb

Rs./Pile

Hammer Test for

Compressive test and
quality of concrete.
Checking of
Reinforcement,
alignment &
compliance of design.

Pile cap, Strep

footings, Tie
beams up to
plinth level

Rs./SqM.

Hammer Test for

Compressive test and
quality of concrete.
Checking of
Reinforcement,
alignment &
compliance of design.
Hammer Test for
Compressive test and
quality of concrete.
Checking of
Reinforcement,
alignment &
compliance of design.

Columns,
Beams, Slab,
Staircase &
Chajja

Rs./SqM.

250.00

Rupees
Two
Hundred
Fifty only

Columns,
Beams, Slab &
Staircase

Rs./SqM.

200.00

Rupees
Two
Hundred
only

Columns,
Beams, Slab &
Staircase

Rs./SqM.

220.00

Rupees
Two
Hundred
only

Hammer Test for

Compressive test and
quality of concrete.
Checking of
Reinforcement,
alignment &
compliance of design.

Amount (In Rs.)

In
In words
figures
1600.00
Rupees
One
Thousand
Six
Hundred
only
300.00
Rupees
Three
Hundred
only

(Rates include service tax and other taxes as applicable)

Detailed procedure of Technical Safety Audit

Page No.: 13