Drill Stem Testing
Drill Stem Testing
Drill Stem Testing
Petroleum Geology
Abstract
One of the most important stages of completing a well is discussed in this report which is the
Drill-Stem Testing (DST). This report discusses three main aspects of this technique, it indicates
the detailed function of each component of the tool assembly. Then it discusses the required
decisions to be made to perform a test. Its main focuses would be on the procedure of the test and
highly emphasizes on the best interpretation of DST pressure charts.
Introduction
Drill-stem testing (DST) is one of the most important completion techniques. It is a type of
temporary completion that is used to evaluate the formation and inspect a reservoirs properties.
According to (Ammann, 1960), the measurement of the reservoir properties by the DST can be
delivered directly or indirectly. Direct measurements means that the data are recorded when the
tool assembly was down in the hole. Those measurements include, the Static Reservoir Pressure,
flow rate measurement, reservoir depletion if took place during the test, and obtaining a recovery
sample of the formation fluids. However, the indirect measurement or empirical measurements are
those parameters that yield from the use of equations and it includes, most importantly the
productivity index (PI), effective permeability of the formation to the fluid flow, formation
transmissibility, skin factor, drainage radius of the investigation test, and detection of reservoir
anomalies (such as barriers, fluid contacts, permeability changes or layered zones). As (Black,
1956) states that special completion equipment are required to perform the test, some of them are
compulsory while others are auxiliary depending on the well conditions and the test requirements.
The following section discusses the tools that make up the DST tool assembly.
Figure (1): Illustrates the components of the Drill-Stem Test tool including both surface
equipment and down-hole tool.
In addition to the basic component of the DST tool there are other auxiliary components
that most of the modern DST assemblies are composed of, which include the following:
1. The Shut-in pressure valve:
This specialized valve is located below the reverse circulating valve of the DST tool
assembly. Bredehoeft (1965) states that shut-in valves have a role in the shut-in periods within
the test, meaning the initial shut-in and the final shut-in periods. One of its functions is to
permit the test valve to be closed at the end of the flow period with reduced prospect of
unseating the packer or letting the pressure equalize around the packer through the by-pass
valve. It also helps in retaining the formation recovered liquids.
8. Perforated pipe:
According to (Raymond, 2006) the perforated pipe is located above the anchor shoe
and its function is to shoot perforating bullets into the formation, as the go-devil is sent
from the surface to start the perforation. A diagram of the perforation process is shown
below:
2. Packer size selection and assigning the location of the packer seal:
Determining the suitable size of the packer and its seal location has a great effect on the
success of the DST test. According to (Black, 1956), it should be decided accurately which
type of packer is required that totally matches the well conditions, whether the well is
open-hole or cased hole, or whether the formation for inspection is a sandstone or
limestone, etc. The location of the packer seals are assigned by the help of caliper logs
which provide an approximate radius of the borehole and the least clearance between the
well wall and the packer seal. As the packer size selection depends on the type of
formation, so the packer seal does.
11
The initial phase of the test is observed in segment (A to B) as shown in the chart above.
As the tool runs down the hole the hydraulic by-pass valve is left open because the packer
has limited clearance between the casing and the wellbore. The open by-pass valve allows
the drilling mud to go up the drilling pipe and up to the surface, this action is meant to
lower the pressure surges created as the tool runs down the hole. The pressure gauges start
to record an increase in the pressure. This increment is due to the buildup in the
hydrostatic pressure of the drilling mud column present inside the well. It can be observed
that the pressure curve is not smooth because of pressure surges which occur even when
the by-pass valve is open. The pressure surges are caused by the addition of connections
12
to the drilling string. Another reason for that is the existence of tight spots encountered in
the hole as the well wall is not straight downwards. Sometimes pressure surges occur due
to addition of water cushion or repair surface equipment. All of these noises are recorded
by the pressure gauges as they run down the hole.
After the perforated section pipe has reached the test interval or total depth (TD), the
surface equipment is connected to the drill pipe during this time the pressure stabilizes at
point (B). The pressure surges end and the initial hydrostatic pressure is recorded
relatively at the point where there is flat pressure values. The driller then slags off the
brakes creating a weight on the DST tool causing the packer to expand. The packer seals
off the area between the interval of interest as well as the gage from the column of mud
above the packer. Once the packer is set the driller rotates the drilling stem causing the
tester valve to open momentarily for few minutes (from B to C). The initial flow takes
place from (C to D) this period lasts from 5 to 10 minutes. The initial flow pressure
recorded at point (C) is nearly atmospheric unless a water cushion is placed in the drill
pipe. This action allows the pressurized formation fluid and drilling mud to flow into the
tool and up to the surface.
The test valve is then closed and the initial shut-in period takes place with a duration of
30-60 minutes from points (D to E). Surface indication of the flow are observed and the
pressure builds up reaching the Static Reservoir Pressure at point (E).
The test tool is opened again from (E to F) and the final flow period occurs from (F to G).
The shape of the buildup will depend on the properties of the formation and the fluids.
The duration of this period takes from three hours to maybe days depending on the owner
requirement.
At the end of the final flow period the test valve is again shut-in at point (G) and the final
buildup period takes place from (G to H). To remove the DST tool the driller first opens
the reverse circulating valve. It is opened hydraulically by pumping the drilling mud down
the annulus, with the valve open the drilling mud circulates down the annulus and the up
the drilling pipe to the surface. The drilling fluid kills the well by keeping the formation
fluids under control. Then the packer is released at point (H) either by rotating the drilling
string or by the use of hydraulic jar. The hydrostatic pressure of the mud column is felt
13
back again by the pressure recorder at point (I), then the tool will retrieve from the hole
from points (I to J).
Conclusion
The integration between tests results and data are compulsory for completing a well. Going blindly
into completion of a well without performing the drill-stem testing is a great loss. This report has
discussed the importance of the DST. It highlighted the main components that makes up the DST
tool each with their own particular function. It also discussed the best design for the DST and how
it is executed. The report came up to conclude that the ability of a well to be completed successfully
is to correctly interpret the DST pressure chart, where by the most important parameter is obtained
from it, the static reservoir pressure, knowing this value and other parameters will aid in further
development of the well.
References
1) C. B. Ammann (1960). Case Histories of Analyses of Characteristics of Reservoir Rock
from Drill-Stem Tests. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/1336-G
2) E.H. Timmerman & H.K. Van Poolen (1972). Practical Use of Drill-Stem Tests. The
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Montreal, (pp. 32-40).
3) J.D. Bredehoeft, (1965). The Drill-Stem test: The Petroleum Industrys Deep-well
Pumping Tests. Published by the U.S. Geological Survey.
4) J.P. Dolan & et.al (1957). Special Application of Drill-Stem Test Pressure Data.
Petroleum Transactions, AIME, vol. 210, (pp. 318-324).
5) M. S. Raymond & W.L. Leffler, (2006). Oil and Gas Production in Nontechnical
Language. Penn Well Corporation
6) N.J. Hyne (2012). Nontechnical Guide of Petroleum Geology, Exploration, Drilling and
Production. Third Edition, Penn Well Corporation.
7) R. Grant & H. Gill (1995). How to Increase the Reliability of your Open Hole Drill-Stem
Test Analyses. The petroleum society of CIM.
8) R.S. Christie (n.d). Use of Recording Pressure Gages in Drill-Stem Tests. Drilling
Practice, (pp. 8-12).
9) W. M. Black (1956). A Review of Drill-Stem Testing Techniques and Analysis. Society of
Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/589-G
14
Online sources
1) http://petrowiki.org/Packers
2) http://glossary.oilfield.slb.com
3) United States Department of Labor:
https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/oilandgas/well_completion/well_completion.html
15