Lsat Vocab
Lsat Vocab
Lsat Vocab
Due to - ---premise
For - ---premise
For example - ---premise
For the reason that - ---premise
Given that - ---premise
In that - ---premise
Owing to - ---premise
Since - ---premise
this can be seen by - ---premise
All - ---sufficient
Any - ---sufficient
Every - ---sufficient
If in order to - ---sufficient
People who - ---sufficient
When - ---sufficient
Whenever - ---sufficient
Not necessarily true - opposite - ---must be true
Not necessarily false - def - ---could be true
Not necessarily false - opposite - ---cannot be true
Then - ---Necessary
Only - ---Necessary
Only if - ---Necessary
Must - ---Necessary
Required - ---Necessary
Until - ---Necessary
Except - ---Necessary
Unless - ---Necessary
Without - ---Necessary
inconsistent - ---2 things that cannot be true
consistent - ---2 things that CAN be true
If someone buys the red shirt, that person buys the blue shirt. In other words,
buying the blue shirt is a necessary condition for buying the red shirt.
Since it is impossible to buy the red shirt without also buying the blue shirt, buying
the blue shirt is a necessary condition for buying the red shirt. In other words, one
can't buy the red shirt without buying the blue shirt, too.
Jameson does not attend the concert unless Steve does. - ---J --> S
Most - ---51% or more
Most + Most - ---Some
Some - ---1 to everyone
Some + Some - ---some or most
On the day after the day - ---2 days next to each other
impugn - ---Dispute the truth
inculcate - ---Instill by persistent instruction
petulance - ---irritable, peevish, or impatient
preceding - ---come before
Fewer than three - ---two or less
efficacy - ---the capacity to produce an effect
transgression - ---A violation of a law, command, or duty
A occurred before B, so A must have caused B. - ---Common Causal Flaw
A and B tend to occur together, so A must cause B. - ---Common Causal Flaw
A is one possible cause, so A must be the only cause. - ---Common Causal Flaw
Weaken a causal argument - ---Provide an alternate cause
Show that cause and effect are reversed
Show there is no causal relationship (merely a coincidence)
Reading comprehension 4 points - ---Cast of Characters
Author's Opinion
Main Idea
Passage Structure
Reading Comprehension pay attention - ---What's interesting
What questions would you ask yourself
Any ideas that are compared or contrasted
Predictions
unprecedented - ---Never done or known before
immediately/far - ---be on the look out
some/most - ---be on the look out
~h --> s - ---not s --> h can have both but must have at least one
h --> ~ s - ---s --> not h can have none but not both
If wrens are in the forest, then so are grosbeaks. - ---W--> G or no G --> no W
If harriers are in the forest, then grosbeaks are not. - ---H --> no G or G --> no H (not
both)
If jays, martins, or both are in the forest, then so are harriers. - ---J or M --> H or no
H --> no J and no M
Wendy appears in every photograph that Selma appears in. - ---S -> W
Raimundo appears in every photograh that Yakira does not appear in - ---Not Y--> R
because of - ---causal term
caused by - ---causal term
determined by - ---causal term
is an effect of - ---causal term
induced by - ---causal term
leads to - ---causal term
promoted by - ---causal term
Prediction - ---In a Prediction, the author states what will happen or what is likely to
happen in the future.
"So once humans begin to tap into this tremendous source of creativity and
innovation, many problems that today seem insurmountable will be within our
ability to solve."
Conditional - ---In a Conditional, the author states the conclusion in terms of,
"if...then..."
"Clearly, ifyou buy a Sturdimade, you can rely on being able to drive it for a very
long distance."
"So ifthey were not so brittle, one could reliably determine a rattlesnake's age
simply from the number of sections in its rattle."
Prescriptive Conclusion - ---Prescriptive Conclusionsstate what "should" or "ought" to
be the case.
Prescriptive Conclusions are always some form of recommendation.
Recommendation Conclusion - ---In a Recommendation, the author proposes a
course of action.
"Additional restrictions should be placed on driver's licenses of teenagers."
"So individuals who want to reduce their risk of cancer should reduce their fat
intake."
Absolute Certainty - ---Absolute
It is inaccurate to say that a diet high in refined sugar cannot cause adult-onset
diabetes, since a diet high in refined sugar can make a person overweight, and
being overweight can predispose a person to adult-onset diabetes. - ---Evidence:
A diet high in refined sugar can make a person overweight.
Being overweight can predispose a person to adult-onset diabetes.
Conclusion: It is inaccurate to say that a diet high in refined sugar cannot cause
adult-onset diabetes.
Method of Argument:
It is inaccurate to say that A cannot cause C because A can cause B and B can
cause C.
Any language learned by the geologist is learned by the the historian. - ---g --> h
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true? ---Must Be True
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage? - ---Must Be
True
The main point of the argument is that - ---Main Point
Larew and Mendota disagree about whether - ---Point at Issue
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument above? ---Assumption
Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly
drawn? - ---Justify
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? - ---Strengthen
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the statement above ---Strengthen
Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively resolve the apparent
paradox above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? ---Weaken
Which one of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above? ---Method
The reasoning in the astronomer's argument is flawed because this argument ---Flaw
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to
the argument above? - ---Parallel
The answer to which one of the following questions would contribute most to an
evaluation of the argument? - ---Evaluate
If the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true? ---Cannot Be True
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the viewpoint of the
historians described above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Rosen's statement? ---Must Be True
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning above? ---Weaken
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument above? ---Assumption
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to
the argument above? - ---Parallel
Of the following, which one most accurately expresses the main point of the
argument? - ---Main Point
Which one of the following, if true, would provide the most support for the
economists' assertion? - ---Strengthen
The argument is flawed because it - ---Flaw
The dialogue most supports the claim that Tony and Raoul disagree about whether ---Point at Issue
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be false? ---Cannot Be True
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage? - ---Must Be
True
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if
they are true? - ---Must Be True
Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above? ---Must Be True
If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true? ---Must Be True
Which one of the following can be logically inferred from the passage? - ---Must Be
True
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following? ---Must Be True
Which one of the following logically follows from the statements above? - ---Must Be
True
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above? ---Must Be True
Which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by the
information above? - ---Must Be True
Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the information
above? - ---Must Be True
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the
argument? - ---Main Point
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the
argument? - ---Main Point
Which one of the following most accurately restates the main point of the passage?
- ---Main Point
The main point of the argument is that - ---Main Point
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the
journalist's argument? - ---Main Point
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the
argument? - ---Main Point
Which one of the following most logically completes the passage - ---Main Point (fill
in the blank)
The information above provides the LEAST support for which one of the following? ---Must Be True X
Which one of the following most logically completes the argument? - ---Main Point
The educators' reasoning provides grounds for accepting which of the following
statements? - ---Must Be True
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? ---Weaken
Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the researcher's argument? ---Weaken
Which one of the following, if shown to be a realistic possibility, would undermine
the argument? - ---Weaken
Which one of the following, if true, would most call into question the analysts'
explanation of the price increase? - ---Weaken
Which one of the following, if true, could be used by Cora to counter Bernard's
rejection of her explanation? - ---Weaken
Which one of the following, if true, is the strongest logical counter parent P can
make to parent Q's objection? - ---Weaken
Which one of the following, if true, most calls into question the claim above? ---Weaken
Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above? ---Weaken
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the speaker's
argument? - ---Weaken
All of the following weakens the politician's argument EXCEPT? - ---Weaken X
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that
the argument - ---Flaw
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly strengthens the argument? ---Strengthen
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the statement above? ---Strengthen
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the statement above? ---Strengthen
Which one of the following, if true, does most to justify the conclusion above? ---Strengthen
Each of the following, if true, supports the claim above EXCEPT: - ---Strengthen X
Which one of the following, if true, LEAST strengthens the argument above? ---Strengthen X
Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT - ---Strengthen
X
Which one of the following discoveries, if it were made, would most support the
above hypothesis about South America and Africa? - ---Strengthen
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the medical doctor's
argument? - ---Strengthen
Each of the following, if true, strengthens the toxicologist's argument EXCEPT ---Strengthen X
Which one of the following, if true, most supports the argument - ---Strengthen
The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed? ---Justify
Which one of the following, if assumed, would allow the conclusion to be properly
drawn? - ---Justify
Which one of the following, if true, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn? ---Justify
Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the argument's conclusion to be
properly inferred? - ---Justify
Which one of the following is an assumption that would serve to justify the
conclusion above? - ---Justify
The environmentalist's conclusion would be properly drawn if it were true that the ---Justify
The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed? ---Justify
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument above? ---Assumption
Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends? ---Assumption
The argument assumes which one of the following? - ---Assumption
The conclusion in the passage above relies on which of the following assumptions? ---Assumption
The argument assumes which one of the following? - ---Assumption
The conclusion in the passage above relies on which one of the following
assumptions? - ---Assumption
The position taken above presupposes which one of the following? - ---Assumption
The conclusion cited does not follow unless - ---Assumption
Which one of the following is an assumption that the art historian's argument
requires in order for its conclusion to be properly drawn? - ---Assumption
On which one of the following assumptions does the argument rely? - ---Assumption
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the columnist's argument
depends? - ---Assumption
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Barnes's argument depends? ---Assumption
Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively resolve the apparent
paradox above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy
in the passage above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the puzzling fact cited
above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to reconcile the discrepancy indicated
above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict
described above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to reconcile the safety experts' belief
with the apparently contrary evidence described above? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the finding of the nicotine
study? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain why raisins contain more
iron per calorie than do grapes? - ---Resolve
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the behavior of the vervet
monkeys described above? - ---Resolve
The method of the argument is to - ---Method
The argument proceeds by - ---Method
The argument derives its conclusion by - ---Method
Which one of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above? ---Method
Which one of the following is an argumentative strategy employed in the argument?
- ---Method
Which one of the following is an argumentative strategy employed in the argument?
- ---Method
The argument employs which one of the following reasoning techniques? - ---Method
Aiesha responds to Adam's argument by - ---Method
Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between
Jane's argument and Mark's argument? - ---Method
The claim that people have positive or negative responses to many nonsense words
plays which one of the following roles in the argument? - ---Method
Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the
psychologist's argument by the claim that the obligation to express gratitude
cannot be fulfilled anonymously? - ---Method
Ruth responds to Jorge's criticism by - ---Method
Sue challenges Anne's reasoning by - ---Method
Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the
argument by the statement that zooplankton feed upon phytoplankton? - ---Method
The claim that humans are still biologically adapted to a diet of wild foods plays
which one of the following roles in the nutritionist's argument? - ---Method
The phrase, "certain traits like herding ability risk being lost among pedigreed dogs"
serves which one of the following functions in the argument? - ---Method
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument's
reasoning? - ---Flaw
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the ground that
the argument - ---Flaw
The reasoning above is flawed because it fails to recognize that - ---Flaw
A questionable aspect of the reasoning above is that it - ---Flaw
The reasoning in the argument is fallacious because the argument - ---Flaw
Which one of the following is most closely parallel in its reasoning to the reasoning
in the argument above? - ---Parallel
Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning most similar to that
exhibited by the argument above? - ---Parallel
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its logical features to the
argument above? - ---Parallel
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to
the argument above? - ---Parallel
The structure of the reasoning in the argument above is most parallel to that in
which one of the following? - ---Parallel
Which one of the following exhibits a flawed pattern of reasoning most similar to
that in the argument above? - ---Parallel Flaw
The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in
which one of the following? - ---Parallel Flaw
The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled
by that in which one of the following arguments? - ---Parallel Flaw
The questionable reasoning in the argument above is most closely paralleled by
that in which one of the following? - ---Parallel Flaw
Which one fo the following arguments exhibits flawed reasoning most similar to that
exhibited by the argument above? - ---Parallel Flaw
The flawed reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in the
commentator's argument? - ---Parallel Flaw
Which one of the following arguments has a flawed pattern of reasoning most like
the flawed reasoning in the argument above? - ---Parallel Flaw
Which one of the following exhibits both of the logical flaws exhibited by the
argument above? - ---Parallel Flaw
The answer to which one of the following questions would contribute most to an
evaluation of the argument? - ---Evaluate
Clarification of which one of the following issues would be most important to an
evaluation of the skeptics' position? - ---Evaluate
Which one of the following would be most important to know in evaluating the
hypothesis in the passage? - ---Evaluate
Which one of the following would it be most relevant to investigate in evaluating the
conclusion of George's argument? - ---Evaluate
Which one of the following would it be most helpful to know in order to judge
whether what the scientist subsequently learned calls into question the hypothesis?
- ---Evaluate
If the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true? ---Cannot Be True
The argument can most reasonably be interpreted as an objection to which one of
the following claims? - ---Cannot Be True
The statements above, if accurate, can best be used as evidence against which one
of the following hypotheses? - ---Cannot Be True
The statements above, if true, most seriously undermine which one of the following
assertions? - ---Cannot Be True
If all of the claims made above are true, then each of the following could be true
EXCEPT: - ---Cannot Be True
If the statements above are true, then which one of the following must be false? ---Cannot Be True
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the point at issue between
Ted and Mary? - ---Point at Issue
Which one of the following most accurately represents what is at issue between
Jorge and Ruth? - ---Point at Issue
The dialogue above lends the most support to claim that Sherrie and Fran disagree
with each other about which one of the following statements? - ---Point at Issue
On the basis of their sentiment, Logan and Mendez are committed to disagreeing
over whether - ---Point at Issue
Which one of the following judgments most closely conforms to the principle above?
- ---Must PR
Which one of the following judgments best illustrates the principle illustrated by the
argument above? - ---Must PR
The principle above, if established, would justify which one of the following
judgments? - ---Must PR
The information above most closely conforms to which one of the following
principles? - ---Strengthen PR
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the principle underlying the
argumentation above? - ---Justify PR
Each of the following principles is logically consistent with the columnist's
conclusion EXCEPT - ---Cannot PR
Which one of the following principles most helps to justify the reasoning above? ---Strengthen PR
Which one of the following propositions most helps to justify the reasoning above? ---Strengthen PR
Each of the following precepts is logically consistent with the columnist's conclusion
EXCEPT - ---Cannot PR
Which one of the following most accurately conforms to the principle above? ---Must PR
The principle above conforms most to which of the following? - ---Strengthen PR
[ A _ B ] ... A in inspected __?__ B - ---before / ahead of
[ A _ B ] ... B is inspected __?__ A - ---after / behind
[ A _ _ _ B ] ... There are exactly three spaces __?__ A and B / A and B are __?__ three
spaces. - ---between / separated by
D is inspected exactly two days before E is inspected. - ---[ D _ E ]
H is inspected exactly two days ahead of when L is inspected. - ---[ H _ L ]
F marches exactly three groups behind G. - ---[ G _ _ F ]
K marches exactly three groups after J. - ---[ J _ _ K ]
H must be inspected on the third day or the fifth day. - --A, B, or C must be displayed on the first day. - --What is a sufficient condition? - ---an event or circumstance whose occurrence
indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
If a sufficient occurrence occurs, then you automatically know that the necessary
condition also occurs.
If a sufficient occurrence occurs, then you automatically know that the necessary
condition also occurs.
Laron performs second only if Nancy performs sixth. - --If V is displayed immediately before W, then S must be displayed third. - --If Kahlil performs first, then Martin performs at some time before Paulo. - --If R is delivered first, then X is delivered fourth. - --If R is inspected on the third day, S is not inspected on the fifth day. - --If F's delivery is earlier than M's, then L's delivery is earlier than H's. - --G is recorded earlier than H - --Z is selected during one of the first two days. - --C must sit 4 chairs behind D, and E must sit 3 chairs before C. - --Either S or T must speak on the third day. - --Tom can sit neither immediately before nor immediately after Pat. - --If J is performed fourth, K is performed sixth. - --A is not shorter than B. - --If A sits next to B, then B does not sit next to C. - --Y is inspected before both X and Z are inspected. - --M and T must be performed on consecutive days. - --R cannot be inspected first. - --Three speakers--F, G, and H--give six consecutive one-hour speeches, two speeches
per speaker. Exactly one speaker speaks during each hour. The speaker that gives
the first speech must also give the second speech. - --K must be played before L.
L must be played before M. - --If Q is displayed fourth, then R must be displayed first.
R and S are displayed consecutively. - --If Q is displayed fourth, then R must be displayed second.
R and S are displayed consecutively. - --W and X cannot speak consecutively.
X must speak third of fifth. - --Six lawyers--H, J, K, L, M, and O--must speak at a convention. The six speeches are
delivered one at a time, consecutively, according to the following restrictions:
K and L must speak consecutively.
O must speak fifth. - --A salesman must visit five families--the Browns, the Chans, the Duartes, the Egohs,
and the Feinsteins--one after another, not necessarily in that order. The visit must
conform to the following restrictions:
The Browns must be visited first or fifth.
The Feinsteins cannot be visited third.
The Chans must be visited fourth. - --A child must play five games--P, Q, R, S, and T--one after another, not necessarily in
that order. The games must be played according to the following conditions:
The child plays exactly two games between playing S and playing T, whether or not
S is played before T.
P is played immediately before Q is played. - --A doctor must see six patients--C, D, E, F, G, and H--one after another, not
necessarily in that order. The patients must be seen according to the following
conditions:
E is seen exactly three patients after C.
D is seen immediately before F is seen.
* If G is seen third, which one of the following must be true? - ---The CE split-block
must be placed into slots 1-4 because if it is placed in slots 2-5 there will be no
room for the DF block.
When M is shown first, then O is shown sixth. - ---M1 --> O6
Each rock classic is immediately preceded on the CD by a new composition. - ---[NR]
is wrong because it doesn't state that each new composition is immediately
followed by a rock classic.
B is not inspected the day before C is inspected.
C cannot be inspected second. - --A tutor is planning a daily schedule of individual tutoring sessions for each of six
students--S, T, W, X, Y, and Z. The tutor will meet with exactly one student at a
time, for exactly one hour each session. The tutor will meet students starting at 1
P.M., for six consecutive hours. - ---This is a 1-1-1-1-1-1 relationship (balanced).
Dr. Saitawa schedules six patients--G, H, L, M, O, and P--for surgery during a single
week on Monday through Friday. Dr. Saitawa will operate on exactly one patient
each day, except for one of the days when Dr. Saitawa will operate on two patients
One a patient has been assigned a day, it is still possible that another patient could
be assigned to that day and thus the day is not "closed off" from further
consideration.
Seven passengers--G, H, L, M, O, P, and S are assigned to nine seats. - ---This is a 11-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 relationship (underfunded).
The deficit of variables can be countered by creating two "E" placeholder variables
to represent the two empty seats.
Six swimmers--H, J, K, L, N, and P--are assigned to six swimming lanes numbered 1
through 6. Exactly one swimmer is assigned to each lane. The lane assignments
conform to the following conditions:
Swimmer K is assigned a lower-numbered lane than is swimmer J.
Swimmer P is assigned a lower-numbered lane than is swimmer K. - --Five dogs--an Akita, a Bulldog, a Cocker Spaniel, a Doberman, and an English
Settler--compete in the final round of a dog show. Each dog will be shown alone to
the judges exactly once in accordance with the following conditions:
The Doberman can be shown neither immediately before nor immediately after the
English Settler.
The Akita must be shown two places before the Doberman.
The Resources meeting is held at some time after the Finance meeting.
The Accounting meeting is held second. - --Six students--T, V, W, X, Y, and Z--are scheduled to speak at a debate contest. Each
student will speak exactly once, and no two speakers will speak at the same time.
The schedule must satisfy the following requirements:
T speaks at some time before W.
X must be the fourth speaker.
V speaks immediately after T. - --A jazz band director is selecting the songs for an evening's performance. Seven
songs--F, G, H, J, Q, R, and S--will be played one after another, not necessarily in
that order. Each song will be played exactly once, according to the following
conditions:
F must be played immediately before or immediately after G.
H must be played immediately before or immediately after J.
S must be played fourth.
G must be played after F.
H must be played before J.
The limbo class and the rumba class are not scheduled for the same time.
The charleston class and the polka class must be scheduled for the same time.
The limbo class is scheduled at some time after the polka class.
The rumba class and the waltz class are not scheduled for the same time.
If the tango class is scheduled for the same time as the foxtrot class, which one of
the following must be true?
(A) The jitterbug class and the limbo class must be scheduled for the same time.
(B) The jitterbug class and the rumba class must be scheduled for the same time.
(C) The jitterbug class and the waltz class must be scheduled for the same time.
(D) The limbo class and the rumba class must be scheduled for the same time.
(E) The rumba class and the waltz class must be scheduled for the same time. ---Answer choice (B) is correct. If F is scheduled with T, then only J remains to be
paired with R.
A driver must pick up exactly eight passengersP, R, S, T, V, X, Y, and Zone at a
time, not necessarily in that order. The pickups must be made in accordance with
the following conditions:
Either T or V must be picked up fifth.
Either Y or Z must be picked up third.
The driver picks up exactly one passenger between picking up T and picking up Z.
S is picked up eighth when Y is picked up third.
Z must be picked up ahead of T.
Which one of the following statements about the doctor's schedule must be true?
(A) The maximum number of patients scheduled for Monday is one.
(B) The maximum number of patients scheduled for Tuesday is two.
(C) The maximum number of patients scheduled for Friday is three.
(D) The minimum number of patients scheduled for Saturday is two.
(E) The minimum number of patients scheduled for Sunday is two. - ---Answer
choice (D) is the correct answer. If L is scheduled for Monday, then according to the
second rule P cannot be scheduled for Monday.
Answer choice (C) is correct since the maximum number of patients that can ever
be scheduled for a single day is three (3-1-1-1-1-1-1).
Opposite of "Cannot Be True" - ---Could Be True
Opposite of "Could Be True" - ---Cannot Be True
Opposite of "Not Necessarily True" - ---Must Be True
Opposite of "Must Be True" - ---Not Necessarily True
[Logical Opposition]
If G is seated second, which one of the following could be true? - ---1 = Could Be
True
4 = Cannot Be True
[Logical Opposition]
Which one of the following cannot be true? - ---1 = Cannot Be True
4 = Could Be True
[Logical Opposition]
If R is selected fifth, which one of the following must be true? - ---1 = Must Be True
4 = Not Necessarily True
[Logical Opposition]
Which one of the following must be true? - ---1 = Must Be True
4 = Not Necessarily True
[Logical Opposition]
Each of the following must be true except: - ---1 = Not Necessarily True
4 = Must Be True
"Must Be False" - ---Cannot Be True
"Not Necessarily False" - ---Could Be True
"Could Be False" - ---Not Necessarily True
"Cannot Be False" - ---Must Be True
an argument vs. a set of facts - ---An argument:
" All professors are ethical (premise). Mason is a professor (premise). So Mason is
ethical (conclusion). "
A set of facts:
" The Jacksonville area has just over one million residents. The Cincinnati area has
almost two million residents. The New York area has almost twenty million residents.
"
"What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should I believe this
argument? What evidence exists?"
What is a conclusion? - ---A statement or judgement that follows from one or more
reasons.
A conclusion is the point the author tries to prove by using another statement.
"What is the author driving at? What does the author want me to believe? What
point follows from the others?"
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
Humans cannot live on Venus because the surface temperature is too high. - ---P:
because the surface temperature is too high.
C: Humans cannot live on Venus.
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
The economy is in tatters. Therefore, we must end this war. - ---P: The economy is in
tatters.
C: Therefore, we must end this war.
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
We must reduce our budget due to the significant cost overruns we experienced
during production. - ---P: due to the significant cost overruns we experienced during
production.
millions of dollars in lost revenue. Thus, congress will pass a stricter fraud control
bill since the insurance industry has one of the most powerful lobbies. - ---P1: fraud
has cost the insurance industry millions of dollars in lost revenue.
P2: since the insurance industry has one of the most powerful lobbies.
Since we need to have many different interests to sustain us, the scientists' belief
must be incorrect. - ---P: since we need to have many different interests to sustain
us.
C: so we should push forward with our efforts to recolonize the forest with snowy
tree crickets.
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
Television has a harmful effect on society. This can be seen from the poor school
performance of children who watch significant amounts of television and from the
fact that children who watch more than six hours of television a day tend to read
less than non-television watching children. - ---P1: This can be seen from the poor
school performance of children who watch significant amounts of television
P2: from the fact that children who watch more than six hours of television a day
tend to read less than non-television watching children.
P2: for the simple reason that these development projects will greatly accelerate
the loss of currently protected land.
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
Every professor at Fillmore University teaches exactly one class per semester.
Fillmore's Professor Jackson, therefore, is teaching exactly one class this semester.
Moreover, I heard Professor Jackson say she was teaching only a single class. - ---P1:
Every professor at Fillmore University teaches exactly one class per semester.
P2: Moreover, I heard Professor Jackson say she was teaching only a single class.
P2: These wineries claim the unfiltered juice ultimately produces a more flavorful
and intense wine.
CP: However, the separated juice contains impurities and many wineries do not
filter the juice.
C: we should trust their judgement and not shy away from unfiltered wine.
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
Phenylketonurics are people who cannot metabolize the amino acid phenylalanine.
There are dangers associated with phenylketonuria, and products containing
phenylalanine must carry a warning label that states, "Phenylketonurics: contains
phenylalanine." In addition, all children in developed societies receive a
phenylketonuria test at birth. Hence, at the moment, we are doing as much as
possible to protect against this condition. - ---P1: Phenylketonurics are people who
cannot metabolize the amino acid phenylalanine.
P2: There are dangers associated with phenylketonuria, and products containing
phenylalanine must carry a warning label that states, "Phenylketonurics: contains
phenylalanine."
C: Hence, at the moment, we are doing as much as possible to protect against this
condition.
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
During last nights robbery, the thief was unable to open the safe. Thus, last nights
robbery was unsuccessful despite the fact that the thief stole several documents.
After all, nothing in those documents was as valuable as the money in the safe. ---P1: During last nights robbery, the thief was unable to open the safe.
P2: After all, nothing in those documents was as valuable as the money in the safe.
CP: despite the fact that the thief stole several documents.
C: The best way of eliminating traffic congestion will not be easily found.
PREMISE/CONCLUSION
Because the Vikings have the best quarterback in football, they therefore have the
best offense in football. Because they have the best offense in football, they will win
the Super Bowl next year. - ---P: Because the Vikings have the best quarterback in
football
Sue: Nonsense. Usually no one bothers to try to observe comets when they are so
far from the Sun. This flare was observed only because an observatory was tracking
Halley's Comet very carefully. - ---P1: Halley's Comet, now in a part of its orbit
relatively far from the Sun, recently flared brightly enough to be seen by telescope.
P2: No comet has ever been observed to flare so far from the Sun before
P: Usually no one bothers to try to observe comets when they are so far from the
Sun.
C: This flare was observed only because an observatory was tracking Halley's
Comet very carefully.
because - ---Premise Indicator
since - ---Premise Indicator
for - ---Premise Indicator
for example - ---Premise Indicator
for the reason that - ---Premise Indicator
in that - ---Premise Indicator
given that - ---Premise Indicator
as indicated by - ---Premise Indicator
For example, consider an argument discussing a new surgical technique. The ideas
of surgery and medicine are within the scope of the argument. The idea of federal
monetary policy, on the other hand, would not be within the scope of the argument.
ad hominem - ---An attack on the person rather than on the opponent's ideas.
I met the ambassador riding his horse. He was snorting and steaming, so I gave him
a lump of sugar.
tu quoque (too-KWO-kwee) - ---AKA the appeal to hypocrisy.
The "you too" argument.
"How can you tell me not to join the military? You did when you were young."
"Why should we listen to Brown's support for the new carpark when only last year
he opposed the whole idea?"
"Nicole identified that Hannah had committed a logical fallacy, but instead of
addressing the substance of her claim, Hannah accused Nicole of committing a
fallacy earlier on in the conversation."
red herring - ---Something that draws attention away from the main issue.
Scotland stole a goal in the first half, but England's efforts were well rewarded in the
second half when...
The state should subsidize opera because it would be too expensive to mount
productions without the extra support from public funds.
(And as the train heads off into the distance, wait for the stations marked son et
lumire concerts, civil war re-enactments, and gladiatorial displays. If opera is
different, we need to know why.)
post hoc fallacy - ---False assumption that because one event occurred before
another event, it must have caused that event.
Bill purchases a new PowerMac and it works fine for months. He then buys and
installs a new piece of software. The next time he starts up his Mac, it freezes. Bill
concludes that the software must be the cause of the freeze.
The Republicans pass a new tax reform law that benefits wealthly Americans.
Shortly thereafter the economy takes a nose dive. The Democrats claim that the the
tax reform caused the economic woes and they push to get rid of it.
slippery slope fallacy - ---*not all slippery slope arguments are fallacious.*
*if A happens, and then Z happens later, it doesn't necessarily mean that A caused
Z to happen. This is a post hoc fallacy.*
You said that if we allow A to happen, then Z will eventually happen too, therefore A
should not happen.
The problem with this reasoning is that it avoids engaging with the issue at hand,
and instead shifts attention to extreme hypotheticals. Because no proof is presented
to show that such extreme hypotheticals will in fact occur, this fallacy has the form
of an appeal to emotion fallacy by leveraging fear. In effect the argument at hand is
unfairly tainted by unsubstantiated conjecture.
e.g. Colin Closet asserts that if we allow same-sex couples to marry, then the next
thing we know we'll be allowing people to marry their parents, their cars and even
monkeys.
deductive reasoning - ---reasoning from the general to the particular (or from cause
to effect). "Teenagers cause the most car accidents. You're a teenager, you will get
in a car accident."
inductive reasoning - ---reasoning from detailed facts to general principles.
e.g. All of the ice we have examined so far is cold. Therefore, all ice is cold."
strawman - ---You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
e.g. After Will said that we should put more money into health and education,
Warren responded by saying that he was surprised that Will hates our country so
much that he wants to leave it defenceless by cutting military spending.
bandwagon - ---"Everyone is doing it so you should too."
The flaw in this argument is that the popularity of an idea has absolutely no bearing
on its validity.
If it did, then the Earth would have made itself flat for most of history to
accommodate this popular belief.
e.g. Shamus pointed a drunken finger at Sean and asked him to explain how so
many people could believe in leprechauns if they're only a silly old superstition.
Sean, however, had had a few too many Guinness himself and fell off his chair.
appeal to authority - ---You said that because an authority thinks something, it must
therefore be true.
It's important to note that this fallacy should not be used to dismiss the claims of
experts, or scientific consensus. Appeals to authority are not valid arguments, but
nor is it reasonable to disregard the claims of experts who have a demonstrated
depth of knowledge unless one has a similar level of understanding and/or access to
empirical evidence. However it is, entirely possible that the opinion of a person or
institution of authority is wrong; therefore the authority that such a person or
institution holds does not have any intrinsic bearing upon whether their claims are
true or not.
e.g. Not able to defend his position that evolution 'isn't true' Bob says that he knows
a scientist who also questions evolution (and presumably isn't a primate).
loaded question - ---You asked a question that had a presumption built into it so that
it couldn't be answered without appearing guilty.
e.g. Grace and Helen were both romantically interested in Brad. One day, with Brad
sitting within earshot, Grace asked in an inquisitive tone whether Helen was having
any problems with a drug habit.
begging the question - ---You presented a circular argument in which the conclusion
was included in the premise.
This logically incoherent argument often arises in situations where people have an
assumption that is very ingrained, and therefore taken in their minds as a given.
Circular reasoning is bad mostly because it's not very good.
e.g. The word of Zorbo the Great is flawless and perfect. We know this because it
says so in The Great and Infallible Book of Zorbo's Best and Most Truest Things that
are Definitely True and Should Not Ever Be Questioned.
Since always signals - ---Evidence
Lower case 'since' means - ---That the preceding clause is the conclusion
When the conclusion introduces a term NOT mentioned in the evidence, the
assumption will provide a.. - ---Logical basis for the term
An Assumption is an.. - ---Unstated gap b/w the evidence and conclusion
To help determine what an author's conclusion is, use the - ---One Sentence Test
Because is a key word to signal - ---Evidence
Therefore is a key word to signal - ---Conclusion
In Formal Logic "The only " identifies - ---Suffucient Condition
All' Negated is - ---Not all
When an Assumption stimulus contains formal logicstatements, think about what
can be deduced from each statement. In particular, identify the contrapositive
because... - ---it is likely to be the correct answer
TIP- The same type of wrong answer will show up REPEATEDLY throughout the
Logical Reasoning section the following are examples - ---(A) Most art is shocking ( C
) Art used to be more shocking than it currently is ( E ) Anything that shocks is art
In Formal Logic "Requires " identifies - ---Necessity
None' Negated is - ---Some
How does the Denial Test work - ---Deny the answer choice & see if it makes the
conclusion fall apart
In Formal Logic "All " identifies - ---Suffucient Condition
More' Negated is - ---Less-than or Equal
What key words in a Logical Reasoning QUESTION indicates that you should use the
denial test - ---Necessary, Depends, Required
In Formal Logic "Guarantees " identifies - ---Necessity
Thus is a key word to signal - ---conclusion
W: Evidence that the correlation may really be just a coincidence, due to a third
factor or reversed
Must be' Negated is - ---Need not be
Common Argument Structure
C: The First thing did Cause the Second
E: One thing can cause another
A:
S:
W: - ---A: There is no other possible explanation for the 2nd event to occur
W: Some other factor that makes the given basis for the prediction less
important/less relevant
Can be' Negated is - ---Cannot be
A: ? - ---A: Y--> Z
If presented w/ an answer choice that is difficult to comprehend then...? - ---The
more confussing it is , the more likely the answer choice is a distracter
In Formal Logic "None " identifies - ---Mutually Exclusive
Clearly is a key word that signals - ---Conclusion
A is a lower numbered position than B....Scribe as... - ---A...B
So is a key word to signal - ---Conclusion
In Formal Logic "Bound to lead to " identifies - ---Necessity
A gets out at some time after B....Scribe as... - ---B...A
A gets out some time before B....Scribe as... - ---A...B
In Formal Logic "Every " identifies - ---Suffucient Condition
A gets out at some time before B but after C....Scribe as... - ---C...A...B
A gets out immediately before B....Scribe as... - ---AB
Consequently is a key word to signal - ---Conclusion
In Formal Logic "Cannot " identifies - ---Mutually Exclusive
A gets out immediately after B....Scribe as... - ---BA
In Formal Logic "Are destined to " identifies - ---Necessity
Exactly one person gets out after A but before B....Scribe as... - ---A_B
A is exactly two positions before B....Scribe as... - ---A_B
In Formal Logic "Impossible " identifies - ---Mutually Exclusive
At least one person gets out after A but before B ....Scribe as... - ---A_...B
In Formal Logic "Incapable " identifies - ---Mutually Exclusive
Obviously is a key word to signal - ---Conclusion
Exactely one person gets out b/w A and B ....Scribe as... - ---A/B_B/A
It is clear from" signals - ---Evidence
In Formal Logic "Only (if) " identifies - ---Necessity
A is imediately next to B....Scribe as... - ---AB or BA
M got out after either V or G but not both....Scribe as... - ---V...M...G AND G...M...V
or
V//G...M...G/V
H or Y --> ~G
Either A or B must be selected, but A and B cannot both be selected....scribe as... ---A//B
Abstract Rules & Considerations
J and K have at least one symptom in common...Question you ask yourself? ---What symptom could that be?
Abstract Rules & Considerations
L has greater number of symptoms than K... Question you ask yourself? - ---How
many could L have how many could K have?
Abstract Rules & Considerations
Exactly twice as many people are in group 1 as in group 2. ...Question you ask
yourself? - ---How many people can be in group one?
Abstract Rules & Considerations
Exactly one entity is in every group. ...Question you ask yourself? - ---Which entity
could that be? Must it be? Could it be not?
Section Strategy - ---The most effective and efficient order approach the section:
choose your passage # of questions and degree of difficulty
Read the passage strategically
Identify the Question Type
Research the Relevant Text
Make a Prediction
Evaluate the Answer Choices
Approach - --- Identify the topic
Scope
Purpose
Main idea
Question Types - --- Global
Detail
Inference
Logic Function
Logic Reasoning
Global Questions - --- Identify the question type: "Main idea", "Purpose",
"Organization"
Task: Think big picture, Review T/S/P/MI, Consult you roadmap
You should be able to predict an answer to most Global questions
Do global questions first
Global questions are usually the first and next to last questions
Detail Questions - --- Identify the question type: "According to the author", "The
passage states", "the author mentions"
Task: Research the relevant text
Inference Questions - --- Identify the question type: "the author implies", "the
passage suggests", "likely to agree"
Task: Read between the lines, Perhaps combine statements, Identify what must
follow from the passage
Inference means "must be true". It's a statement that must be true if everything in
the stimulus is true.
Inference questions require you to paraphrase the relevant text or make a
deduction
Common wrong answer choices; 180, faulty use of detail, extreme, out of scope
Answer inference questions after you've already picked up points with Global and
Detail questions
The correct answer to an inference question doesn't require any information that
isn't included in the stimulus
Valid inferences aren't necessarily mind-blowing
Beware of extreme wording in inference answer choices
The correct answer doesn't have to take the entire stimulus into account
Logical Function Questions - --- Identify the question type: "the author...primarily in
order to", "primary purpose of the first passage", "best describes the function of"
Task: Looks at the context of the detail or paragraph and ask why the author put it
there
Common wrong answer choices; 180, distortion, faulty use of detail
Logical Reasoning Questions - --- Identify the question type: Will mimic LR question
types, including
o strengthening / weakening - "supports" / "undermines"
o Principle - "principle"
However Even So
Nevertheless Whereas
On the other hand Conversely
Instead
Emphasis Keywords - ---Remarkable (more / most) important
Compelling Substantial
Even more than
Opinion Keywords - ---Believed by Thought to be
Asserts Some maintain
Argues that According to
As X sees it The astronomers assumed
Contrast Keywords - ---; In addition
Also As well
Similarly Likewise
Illustration Keywords - ---: In contrast to
For example
Temporal Keywords - ---Since Until recently
Recent developments In the past
Historically Traditionally
Numerical Keywords - ---Three possible explanations There are two reasons for this
Abrams describes a fourfold structure
Evidence Keywords - ---Because Since
This is clear from
Conclusion Keywords - ---Thus Clearly as a result
And so
Words that reveal the author's viewpoint - Negative - ---Doubtful Unconvincing
Unlikely Danger
Harmful
Words that reveal the author's viewpoint - Positive - ---Cogent Completing
Promising
renegade - ---(n) rebel; a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another
uphold - ---(v) to give support to; to keep in place
lissome - ---(adj) flexible; nimble, quick,
missive - ---(n) a letter (the kind you send to another person through the post)
suffuse - ---(v) to spread over or through in the manner of fluid or light
devious - ---(adj) tricky/underhanded; wandering; not straightfoward "The Joker in
the Batman series is a _____ character."
fiat - ---(n) a command or act of will that creates something without or as if without
further effort
avow - ---(v) to declare openly, bluntly, assuredly, and without shame
connive - ---(v) to pretend ignorance of or fail to take action against something one
ought to oppose; to be indulgent or in secret sympathy
potentate - ---(n) one who holds great power; a king or other supreme leader
saturate - ---(v) to compltely cover/fill; to fill a solid with a liquid to the point where
no more can be absorbed, dissolved, or retained; to cause to combine until there is
no further tendency to combine
diaphanous - ---(adj) see-through (a gown, eg) delicate; letting light through
"Diana's diaphonous gown showed off her lovely legs."
partisan - ---(n) a firm believer in a cause, (or party, person...); a member of a
guerrilla band operating within enemy lines
breach - ---(n/v) infraction or violation of a law, obligation, or physical space
dissemble - ---(v) to hide under a false appearance; to put on the appearance of
wayward - ---(adj) really-super-poorly behaved; following one's own capricious,
wanton, or depraved inclinations; following no clear principle or law
impasse - ---(n) a predicament affording no obvious escape; deadlock
deprecate - ---(v) to put down (with words); to express disapproval of; to pray
against
grandiloquent - ---(adj) a lofty, extravagantly colorful, pompous, or bombastic style,
manner, or quality especially in language
estrangement - ---(n) to arouse especially mutual enmity or indifference in where
there had formerly been love, affection, or friendliness
constrain - ---(v) to hold back by force (physical or otherwise)
ingenuous - ---(adj) innocent and showing childlike simplicity; naive and trusting;
young; unsophisticated; candid