2014 NUVAissis
2014 NUVAissis
2014 NUVAissis
DOI 10.1007/s10509-014-1907-x
O R I G I N A L A RT I C L E
Received: 7 February 2014 / Accepted: 21 March 2014 / Published online: 9 April 2014
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
2 Scientific requirements
1 Introduction
The WSO-UV (Sachkov et al. 2014) is an international
project developed to guarantee access to the ultraviolet
(UV) range in the post-Hubble Space Telescope era. This
170 cm space telescope has been conceived as a multipurpose observatory incorporating instrumentation for astronomical imaging and spectroscopy. The WSO-UV spectrographs consist of three different instruments: two highresolution (R 55,000) echelle spectrographs and a long
slit spectrograph offering low resolution (R 1000) spectroscopy (Hermanutz et al. 2012; Sachkov 2010; Sachkov
et al. 2014). The camera unit of the WSO-UV is named
ISSIS: the Imaging and Slitless Spectroscopy Instrument.
The baseline for ISSIS design, as approved in the PDR held
178
Table 1 Point source fluxes to reach S/N >10 in 3600 sec (imaging)
Wavelength ()
1500
9.0 1017
2300
5.0 1018
1215
8.0 1015
1306
6.0 1016
1335
8.0 1016
1550
1.0 1015
2500
1.3 1016
long-pass and narrow band filters for specific scientific investigations and, additionally, neutral density filters to allow
observations of sources well above the sensitivity limit. ISSIS will be the only UV imager available in space for astronomical uses at the time of WSO-UV launch.
In slitless spectroscopy mode, the system makes use of
flat reflective gratings as dispersive components; they are
located on the MSM. There is one grating per channel to
redirect the light either to the FUV or the NUV detectors.
In nominal spectroscopic mode, the filter wheels are set in
open (no-filter) position. The diffraction gratings have peak
efficiency at 1400 with groove density of 450 lines per
mm for the FUV channel and at 2300 with 250 l/mm for
the NUV channel.
Finally, the calibration mode is used to perform flat-field
calibration of the FUV and NUV detectors on a pixel-topixel basis (high-spatial frequency flat). In this mode, a shutter is used to block the light coming from the telescope. For
calibration, the MSM is set in a configuration that contains a
flat mirror aligned at such an angle that directs the light coming from a calibration subsystem into the end of the optical
path of the FUV or NUV channel (from the FWs to the detectors). The calibration subsystem consists of a deuterium
discharge lamp and two mirrors to project a uniform beam
on the focal plane assembly. The main optical parameters
for ISSIS are summarized in Table 3.
The total efficiency of ISSIS is characterized by the integrated system throughput. This throughput has been determined by taking into account the telescope performance,
the internal reflections in the instrument and the quantum
efficiencies of the MCP detectors, whereas filters transmittance has not been included in the throughput calculations.
179
NUV channel
Spectral range
11501750
18503200
1400
2500
70 arcsec 75 arcsec
70 arcsec 75 arcsec
36 arcsec 65 arcsec
31 arcsec 61 arcsec
Detector type
CsI MCP
CsTe MCP
Detector diameter
40 mm
40 mm
Pixel scale
0.036 arcsec
0.036 arcsec
<7 %
<7 %
Number of reflections
Temporal resolution
40 ms
40 ms
R = 500
R = 500
orthogonal axis
The expected performance of ISSIS in imaging mode involves a total throughput of 1.2 % at 1400 (FUV
channel) and 6.5 % at 2500 (NUV channel). For slitless spectroscopy we obtain throughput peaks of 0.3 %
(1400 ) and 2.9 % (2500 ) for FUV and NUV, respectively. The estimated sensitivity in this section is conservative and based on UVIT-alike detectors1 (Hutchings 2013).
The final provider for ISSIS detectors is yet to be defined.
A comparison of the main characteristics of WSO-ISSIS,
GALEX (Morrissey et al. 2007) and HST in the imaging
and spectroscopy modes is performed. Table 4 shows the
comparison of ISSIS, GALEX and HST (ACS/SBC, WFC3)
in imaging mode (Space Telescope Science Institute 2014a)
and Tables 5 and 6 show the comparison of ISSIS, GALEX
and HST (STIS, COS) (Space Telescope Science Institute
2014c; Space Telescope Science Institute 2014b) in spectroscopy mode. Notice that the quoted spatial resolution corresponds to the PSF integrated over a 1020 minutes exposure time. This includes a significant broadening caused by
the accuracy of the FGS system; FGS guarantee a pointing
accuracy better than 0.1 arcsec at 3 sigma (Shustov et al.
2014). This motion is susceptible to be used to decrease the
MCP detector fatigue; see, for instance Martin et al. (2003)
for the GALEX strategy for this purpose. Moreover, part of
the optical quality loosed by the pointing inaccuracy can
be recovered making use of the photon counting nature of
MCPs detectors. As a result, ISSIS pixel scale has been selected to be 0.036 arcsec/pix though, naively, it may look as
the ISSIS PSF being oversampled.
ISSIS performance is, in all senses, intermediate between
the GALEX wide field imagers and the high sensitivity
1 UVIT
CsI MCP
a Based
0.15 arcsec
DETECTOR FORMAT
SPATIAL RESOLUTION
(FWHM)
70 arcsec 75 arcsec
70 arcsec 75 arcsec
FIELD OF VIEW
0.15 arcsec
0.036 arcsec/pix
6.5 %
1.2 %
PEAK EFFICIENCYa
0.036 arcsec/pix
2500
1400
PIXEL SCALE
18503200
11501750
4.3 arcsec
1.5 arcsec/pix
CsI MCP
4572 arcsec
1.8 %
1516
13441786
FUV
PEAK THROUGHPUT
GALEX
FUV
NUV
ISSIS
SPECTRAL RANGE
CHANNEL
5.3 arcsec
1.5 arcsec/pix
Cs2Te MCP
4500 arcsec
3.1 %
2200
17712831
NUV
Table 4 Comparison of the main characteristics and performances of the ISSIS, GALEX and HST instruments in imaging mode
CsTe MCP
0.039 0.039 arcsec/pix
0.07 arcsec
6000
200010000
WFC3 (UVIS)
CsI MCP
7.5 %
1250
11501700
SBC (ACS)
HUBBLE
180
Astrophys Space Sci (2014) 354:177185
181
Table 5 Comparison of the main characteristics and performances of the ISSIS, GALEX and HST instruments in spectroscopy mode in the FUV
channel
ISSIS
GALEX
STIS HUBBLE
COS HUBBLE
CHANNEL
FUV
FUV
FUV-MAMA
FUV-MAMA
SPECTRAL RANGE
11501750
13441786
11501700
9002150
PEAK THROUGHPUT
1400
1516
1216
1335
PEAK EFFICIENCYa
0.3 %
1.0 %
3.4 % (G140L)
3.4 % (G140L)
FIELD OF VIEW
36 arcsec 65 arcsec
4572 arcsec
25 arcsec 25 arcsec
25 arcsec 25 arcsec
DETECTOR FORMAT
CsI MCP
CsI MCP
CsI MCP
CsI MCP
PIXEL SCALE
0.036 arcsec/pix
1.5 arcsec/pix
0.114 arcsec/pix
SPECTRAL RESOLUTION
500
250300
50010010 at 11503100
DETECTORS EFFICIENCY
8 % at 1400
12 % at 1516
24 % at 1216
26 % at 1335
a Based
Table 6 Comparison of the main characteristics and performances of the ISSIS, GALEX and HST instruments in spectroscopy mode in the NUV
channel
ISSIS
GALEX
STIS HUBBLE
COS HUBBLE
CHANNEL
NUV
NUV
NUV-MAMA
NUV-MAMA
SPECTRAL RANGE
18503200
17712831
16003100
16503200
2250
PEAK THROUGHPUT
2500
2200
2537
PEAK EFFICIENCYa
2.9 %
2.1 %
1.7 % (G230L)
1.5 % (G230L)
FIELD OF VIEW
31 arcsec 61 arcsec
4500 arcsec
25 arcsec 25 arcsec
25 arcsec 25 arcsec
DETECTOR FORMAT
CsTe MCP
Cs2Te MCP
CsTe MCP
CsTe MCP
PIXEL SCALE
0.036 arcsec/pix
1.5 arcsec/pix
0.0235 arcsec/pix
SPECTRAL RESOLUTION
500
80150
50010010 at 11503100
DETECTORS EFFICIENCY
17 % at 2300
8 % at 2200
9 % at 2537
10 % at 2250
a Based
Detectors: The tests performed on the detector could include: sensitivity, response as a function of wavelength,
spatial variation of sensitivity, tests to estimate the centroid of the detected photons, photometric non-linearity
in photon-counting mode, gain as a function of MCP voltage, distortions on the detector. Dark rate, dynamic range,
and cosmetic defect fraction will be measured. While
some of these measurements will be repeated often during
the course of subsystem testing and instrument integration, definitive measurements must be made in the final
configuration under realistic environmental conditions, in
the instrument level tests phase.
Filters: The transmission of each filter as a function of
wavelength, spatial variation of sensitivity with position
as a function of wavelength, shift in focus due to the filters.
Mirrors: Reflectivity as a function of wavelength, spatial variation of sensitivity with position as a function of
wavelength, measure of the focus position of the mirrors.
Gratings: Efficiency, wavelength range, length of the
spectra on the detector plane, shift between the object position in the image and the 0th-order spectrum, scattered
and stray-light tests.
Calibration Lamps: The main goal is to measure and characterize the global count-rates of the internal deuterium
(D2) calibration lamp through the filters. Degradation in
the lamps output with time will be also investigated for a
fixed time period.
For ISSIS tests at instrument level, it is required to develop
new facilities for vacuum testing. As today, there are several possibilities being analyzed in Spain and possibly in
Russia. Basic verification tests are: geometric tests, geometric distortion tests, image quality tests, radiometric efficiency, spectroscopy tests, uniformity of the radiometric re-
182
sponse, exposure time repeatability, stray-light tests, mechanism functionality and repeatability. The main challenges
for performing the tests of ISSIS involve the development
of a vacuum chamber fully equipped for UV optical tests
and the telescope simulator for the on-axis beam.
183
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
184
the full detector will be available but the events will be coadded for a single pixel and stored (Gmez de Castro 2012;
Kumar et al. 2012).
ISSIS will also be operated in CORONOGRAPHIC
mode. This mode is defined to alleviate the detector fatigue when observing faint structures close to bright sources.
These dead areas on the detector could be implemented with
masks in the photo-cathode. There are still on-going studies
on the best strategies to set these few dead-areas.
Finally, there will also be a CALIBRATION mode to
measure the degradation of the pixel-to-pixel (small scale)
response making use of the deuterium lamp. Photometric
and spectroscopic calibrations will be carried out based on
astronomical sources making use of the information in the
NASA Multimission Archive on the HST and GALEX mission. ISSIS spectroscopic mode is very similar to the low
dispersion mode in the International Ultraviolet Explorer
(IUE). Observations from the IUE INES Final Archive will
be used for this purpose.
References
ISSIS data policy will be to create final products in format similar to high-energy photon counting missions. In the
photon-counting mode, ISSIS will not provide an integrated,
full-frame two-dimensional image but a list of events corresponding to the time of arrival of each photon. The resulting file will be a FITS binary table with information about
the arrival time of the photon, its position in the detector
and a number of flags that will account for the quality of
the measurement and other issues, such as the possible fraction of pile-up. This policy is similar to that of current missions like XMM-Newton and will offer an opportunity to
the high-energy community to use the same analytic tools
they are currently managing for their data. It is important to
notice that the photon-counting mode does not mean a loss
of imaging information since an image can be constructed
in any case by accumulating the photons during the whole
exposure time. In ACCUM mode, data will be provided as
standard FITS images.
7 Conclusions
ISSIS compares well with the previous UV instrumentation
flown in the NASA missions GALEX and HST. The spectroscopic mode has been defined to provide uniform dispersion and photon counting capabilities to study weak sources
such as young planetary systems, solar-like stars and distant
active sources. The coronographic capabilities will make of
ISSIS a unique instrument to resolve jets from their parent
sources and study the impact of UV radiation in the young
planetary disks evolution.
Acknowledgements ISSIS development is being funded by Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Commerce of Spain. We acknowledge
the Russian WSO-UV team for their support in this paper. The science
team at Universidad Complutense de Madrid acknowledges the financial support of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through
grants AYA2008-06423-C03-01 and AYA2011-29754-C03-C01.
185
Space Telescope Science Institute: ACS: Surveys Instrument Handbook for Cycle, 22, vol. 13.0 (2014a)
Space Telescope Science Institute: COS: Surveys Instrument Handbook for Cycle, 22, vol. 6.0 (2014b)
Space Telescope Science Institute: STIS: Surveys Instrument Handbook for Cycle, 22, vol. 13.0 (2014c)