Cap 12 Termo
Cap 12 Termo
Cap 12 Termo
March 7, 2014
Chapter 12
Introduction to
Chemical Engineering
Thermodynamics
Seventh Edition
Chapter 12 PowerPoint
1.
2.
3.
4.
Copyright the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Chapter 12
F N 2
T
Fugacity is a property of pure components or mixtures in
gas, liquid, or solid phase
Fugacity can be determined in any state regardless of
whether phase equilibrium prevails
Experimental determination is easier when phases are at
equilibrium because of the isofugacity condition
=2
VLE Cell
Experiments:
Isothermal
Isobaric
Gibbs variables measured:
P, T, {xi}, {yi}
Fig. 12.1
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
Fugacity calculation
Binary systems at low pressure:
f y P
1
f2 y2 P
Ideal-gas behavior
Activity coefficient
From isofugacity condition:
1
Lewis/Randall
rule
y1 P
x1 P1sat
(1 y1 ) P
(1 x1 ) P2sat
Henrys law
The two lines
are tangent
df
f
dx
lim lim i
xi 0 x
xi 0 dx
i
i
dxi
df
lim
xi 0 dx
i
Hi
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
Henrys law
Exercise: Show that if Henrys law applies
to one of the species in a binary system,
then the Lewis/Randall rule will apply to
the other species.
(Hint: Use Gibbs/Duhem equation for
chemical potential.)
Positive and
negative deviations
from the
Lewis/Randall rule
Lewis/Randall
rule
x1d 1 x2 d 2 0
x1d ln f1 x2 d ln f2 0
GE
x1 ln 1 x2 ln 2
RT
Read these pages!
Data reduction
pp 437-441
Many models have the form:
GE
x1 x2 ( x1 , x2 )
RT
Therefore, it is convenient to plot:
GE
( x1 , x2 )
x1 x2 RT
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
If is linear:
( x1 , x2 ) a bx1
A21 x1 A12 x2
GE
x1 x2 A21 x1 A12 x2
RT
GE
x1 x2 0.198 x1 0.372 x2
RT
Data reduction
Data reduction
is linear again:
GE
x1 x2 A21 x1 A12 x2
RT
GE
x1 x2 1.27 x1 0.72 x2
RT
Thermodynamic consistency
Area test:
Residual test:
Area test
0 ln 12 dx1 0
1
d ln 1*
d ln *2
ln 1 x1
x2
2
dx1
dx1
For chloroform +
1,4-dioxane at 50 [C]
ln
ln
dx1 0
1
2
M M model M experim
M M model M *
x1
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
Residuals test
Example 12.1
Example 12.1
Example 12.1
Data dont follow Gibbs/Duhem
Data reduction based on GE does not work
Use Barkers approach
This works with any model
Here its used with Margules
Example 12.1
Chapter 12
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
Redlich/Kister expansion
General series expansion:
GE
( x1 , x2 ) a bx1 cx12
x1 x2 RT
Redlich/Kister expansion:
Drawbacks:
No version for multicomponent systems
No explicit temperature dependence
GE
A B( x1 x2 ) C ( x1 x2 ) 2
x1 x2 RT
Margules formulas
Margules formulas
Three-suffix Margules:
Two-suffix Margules:
E
G
( x1 , x2 )
A
x1 x2 RT
Activity coefficients:
GE
A B( x1 x2 ) A B (2 x1 1)
x1 x2 RT
A21 x1 A12 x2
Activity coefficients:
ln 1 Ax22
ln 2 Ax
2
1
Margules formulas
In many instances, model parameters have to be
calculated from a single data point
In such cases, use the equations:
A12
x2 x1
2
ln 1 ln 2
x22
x1
A21
x1 x2
2
ln 2 ln 1
x12
x2
Margules formulas
Four-suffix Margules (Probs. 12.6 & 12.9):
GE
A21 x1 A12 x2 Cx1 x2
x1 x2 RT
Activity coefficients:
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
1 x1 x2 RT
A B( x1 x2 ) A B(2 x1 1)
GE
x
x
A12 A21
1 2
A12
x2
A21
A12 x1 A21
x ln 1
1
x2 ln 2
Activity coefficients:
ln 1
A12
A12 x1
1
A21 x2
A21
ln 2
A21
x2
1
A12 x1
A12 1 ln 1
2
1
A21
ln 2
Wilson model
GE
x1 ln( x1 x2 12 ) x2 ln( x2 x1 21 )
RT
Features:
Versions for multicomponent systems
Show explicit temperature dependence
12
21
ln 1 ln( x1 x2 12 ) x2
x1 x2 12 x2 x1 21
12
21
ln 2 ln( x2 x1 21 ) x1
x
x
x
x1 21
1 2 12
2
Wilson model
At infinite dilution:
ln 1 ln 12 1 21
ln 2 ln 21 1 12
Model parameters:
V2
a
exp 12
V1
RT
V1
a
21 exp 21
V2
RT
12
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
G
G2121
G12 12
x1 x2 RT x1 x2G21 x2 x1G12
E
G12 12
21
ln 1 x 21
2
x1 x2G21 ( x2 x1G12 )
2
G
G2121
12
ln 2 x12 21
2
x2 x1G12 ( x1 x2G21 )
i j:
ij 1
N
N x
ln i 1 ln x j ij N k ki
j 1
k 1 x
j 1
b21
RT
Multicomponent NRTL
N
N
i j:
GE
xi ln x j ij
Vj
aij
RT
i 1
j 1
ij V exp RT
Activity coefficients,
eq. 12.23:
21
Multicomponent Wilson
b12
RT
12
2
2
G
xi
RT i 1
j 1
N
ji
ji
x G
k
ki
ln i
x G
j 1
N
ji
ji
x G
k 1
Chapter 12
x G
k 1
kj
ki
xl Glj lj
x j Gij
ij l N1
N
j 1
xk Gkj
xk Gkj
k 1
k 1
M M xi M i
S S E R xi ln xi
i 1
i 1
V V
H H E
U U E
G G E RT xi ln xi
i 1
A AE RT xi ln xi
i 1
March 7, 2014
InQu 4012
Chapter 12
Heat of solution
Enthalpy/concentration diagrams
Energy balances
Usingheatofformations(Examples12.4and12.5)
Usingenthalpyofsolutions,asinHx diagrams(Examples12.6,
12.7,and12.9)
Sameconceptexpressedonadifferentbasis:
Heatofmixing:permoleofsolution
Heatofsolution:permoleofsolute(1)
Moleratioasconcentrationunit:
H
x1
x1
moles of soulte (1) n1
408,610 [J]
LiClH2O(s)
712,580 [J]
LiCl2H2O(s)
1,012,650 [J]
LiCl3H2O(s)
1,311,300 [J]
429,366 [J]
436,805 [J]
440,529 [J]
441,579 [J]
442,224 [J]
442,835 [J]
InQu 4012
March 7, 2014
Enthalpy-concentration diagrams
Figure12.17(H2SO4+H2O)andFigure12.19(NaOH+H2O)
Importanttoknowthereferencestatesforeachofthem:
Figure12.17:pureliquidat1[atm]and77[F]forH2SO4 and32[F]
forH2O
Figure12.19:infinitelydilutedsoluteat1[atm]and68[F]for NaOH
andpureliquidat32[F]forH2O
Figure 12.14: Heats
of solution at 25C
Figure 12.17: Hx
diagram for
H2SO4(1)/H2O(2)
Dhring plot
Provides boiling point (b.p.) of
solution as a function of the b.p.
of water
That allows calculation of the
boiling-point elevation (BPE)
also known as boiling-point rise
(BPR)
10