Alexander Barkashov & The Rise of NS in Russia
Alexander Barkashov & The Rise of NS in Russia
Alexander Barkashov & The Rise of NS in Russia
lexander Barkashov, the leader of the neo-Nazi Russian National Union, was
born in Moscow in 1953, the son of a blue-collar father and a mother who
was a nurse. The roots of both of his parents families are in the Moscow oblast.
Barkashov has given conflicting accounts of his childhood and youth; in a mid1993 interview that appeared in Izvestiya, Barkashov stated that he and his mother were abandoned by his father, and that he came under the influence of his
maternal grandfather, who had served in the Communist Party apparat at the time
of Stalins anti-cosmopolitan campaign. As Barkashov recalled during the interview, his grandfather told me in detail about the harm that the Jews were bringing to the Russian people. The old man was wise: he warned me against all contacts with Jews.1 There is thus a direct link between Stalins harsh anti-Semitic
campaign of the late 1940s and early 1950s and present-day Russian neo-Nazism.
Barkashov graduated from secondary school in Moscow oblast in 1971 and
then served in the Soviet armed forces from 1972-74. The available sources offer
contradictory accounts concerning where and in what capacity he served. According to the newspaper Moskovsky komsomolets, Barkashov was a corporal in the
army special troops (spetsnaz) assigned to help the Egyptians at the time of the
1973 Arab-Israeli war.2 Barkashovs wife, Valentina Petrovna, on the other hand,
has said that her husband attended a school for sergeants in the Baltic and then
served with the anti-aircraft defenses of the Byelorussian Military District.3
Following his discharge from the army, Barkashov worked for more than a
decade as an electrician at a Moscow power plant. In the evenings, he trained in
the martial arts and then became an instructor of karate. Soon fitness-conscious
and action-oriented young men were flocking to Barkashov to acquire the skills
he had to impart.
John B. Dunlop is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace,
Stanford University, and author of The Rise of Russia and the Fall of the Soviet Empire
(Princeton), among other works. An earlier draft of this article was delivered at the national convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies in
October 1995. The author would like to thank Professors Darrell Hammer and Peter Reddaway for their generous bibliographical assistance.
519
520
DEMOKRATIZATSIYA
In 1985, the year of Gorbachevs accession, Barkashov and one hundred of his
karate students joined Dimitry Vasilevs extremist Russian nationalist organization, Pamyat. Rising rapidly, Barkashov became a member of the Pamyat central
council in 1987 and was then named Vasilevs deputy for security, ideological
work, and education of youth. In October of 1990, however, Barkashov broke
sharply with Vasilev and founded a competing organization, the Russian National Union (Russkoe natsionalnoe yedinstvoRNYe). The declared aim of this
organization was to protect Russians and Slavs from deadly enemies at home and
abroad, especially from the perceived tentacles of an all-pervasive world Jewish
conspiracy.
In early 1995, Vasilev observed of Barkashov: [H]es a very limited person.
We kicked him out for his Nazi ideas. And hes a KGB agent. Barkashov, for his
part, maintains that Vasilev was the one with links to the KGB.4 My suspicion is
that both may be telling the truth.
For three years, from October 1990 to October 1993, Barkashovs organization experienced steady if not spectacular growth. In 1991, shortly before the
August coup, he, like Vladimir Zhirinovsky, issued an appeal for emergency rule
to be introduced by the Soviet government throughout the country.5 Two years
later, on 27 July 1993, Barkashovs neo-Nazi organization was officially registered as a social-political movement by the Justice Department of the City of
Moscow.6 The RNYe also began to publish a newspaper with a print run of 10,000
copies, entitled Russkii poryadok (Russian Order), which was officially registered
with the authorities. By June 1993, the organization had established ten regional
filials in the provinces, the most important of which were in Petersburg and Krasnoyarsk. Some soratniki (co-combatants, or comrades-in-arms) of the RNYe
reportedly fought as volunteers in Trans-Dniestria and Abkhazia, as well as in
Bosnia, on the side of the Serbs.
In the spring of 1992, Barkashov, while continuing to hold the post of chief
soratnik of the RNYe, also became a member of the central council of the newly
founded Russian National Assembly (Russkii natsionalny sobor), whose principal
leader was retired KGB major general Alexander Sterligov. In mid-1994,
Barkashov confided to an interviewer that the KGBs Fifth Directorate had played
a key role in setting up this organization. Eventually, Barkashov severed ties with
the Russian National Assembly, and he now speaks contemptuously of its leader:
All his life, [Sterligov] was a Communist, a KGB man, and suddenly he became
a Russian nationalist. . . . Why? Because a certain group of politicians standing
behind him understood that that tendency [i.e., Russian nationalism] is inevitable.7
The October Uprising
The great Russian political crisis of September-October 1993 served to catapult
Barkashov and his organization to a position of national notoriety. On 21 September, President Yeltsin dissolved the Congress of Peoples Deputies and the
Russian Supreme Soviet and announced new parliamentary elections for the
month of December. Not long afterwards, an estimated 100-200 neo-Nazi soratniki, headed by Barkashov, appeared at the Russian White House to offer their
521
522
DEMOKRATIZATSIYA
523
tained by former officers of the USSR KGB, who dole out laundered and otherwise concealed monies of the former Soviet Communist Party.16 The RNYes centrally located office on Ilinka, close to Red Square, was apparently rented with
funds coming from this cashbox.17 This same cashbox has been used to assist
Zhirinovskys proto-fascist Liberal Democratic Party and Sterligovs Russian
National Assembly.18
As far as their regular activities are concerned, RNYe members continue
relentlessly to train in the martial arts and in marksmanship, but they also seek to
develop their minds by reading approved literature. Among the works read and
studied by soratniki and by candidates for membership in the organization are
Barkashovs book, Azbuka russkogo
natsionalista (The ABCs of a Russian Nationalist), published in 1994, . . . the barkashovtsy engage in
consisting of select articles from preparing lists of enemies to be
Russkii poryadok; Adolf Hitlers Mein arrested and executed when the
Kampf; academician Igor Shafare- militants come to power . . .
vichs Russophobia; and select writings of Zavtra editor-in-chief Alexander Prokhanov.19 For relaxation, the soratniki are wont to listen to recordings of
SS marching songs or to attend a concert of the music of Richard Wagner.
According to a former member of the RNYe counterintelligence section, who
later broke with the organization, the barkashovtsy engage in preparing lists of
enemies to be arrested and executed when the militants come to power; they collect information on a wide range of individuals; and they seek through dissemination of propaganda to prepare the population at large for the introduction of
iron order. The organization also, the former member reported, owns and operates sports halls, offices, cars, trucks, boats, sewing workshops (for the production of RNYe uniforms), printing presses, bunkers, and special isolators (to hold
future prisoners). In addition, it maintains caches of money, weapons, and fuel.
Among the attractions of the organization for young Russian men are said to be
free food, free instruction in 3-4 kinds of combat, a free uniform, and free trips
about Russia. A member of the organization also ceases to feel isolated in society, becoming part of a wolf pack.20
Until 1995, members of the RNYe at times cooperated with other extremist organizations in Russia. According to the above-cited FSB spravka, that practice has
now been abandoned, at least on the part of the Moscow-based leadership of the
organization. A perusal of recent issues of Russkii poryadok reveals sharp attacks
on all rivals, real or potential, of the RNYe: for example, Zhirinovsky, General
Alexander Lebed, General Boris Gromov, Genady Zyuganov, and all monarchists.
The Ideology and Program of the RNYe
The ideology and program of the RNYe are, like those of Hitler and the German
National Socialist Party, insane and genocidal. As the instance of Hitler demonstrated, however, insane and genocidal programs can in fact be rigorously applied.
Since Barkashovs ideas and prejudices have been taken over virtually wholesale
524
DEMOKRATIZATSIYA
from the German Nazisand since those ideas and prejudices are well known
a detailed discussion of them should not be necessary. I will therefore limit myself
to highlighting a few of the RNYe programmatic positions. In one areathat of
religionBarkashovs stance, as we shall see, diverges notably from that of his
mentor, Hitler, resembling that of Corneliu Codreanu, the charismatic leader of
the interwar Romanian fascists, who was strangled by gendarmes loyal to King
Carol of Romania in 1938.
At the center of the RNYe program lie twin obsessions with race and conspiracy. It is these obsessions that render the RNYe especially dangerous from a
political perspective. The Russian ethnos, in the RNYe view, must harshly assert
itself as the ruling people of the Russian Republic to protect Russians from lethal
internal and external enemies. In 1917, the RNYe contends, in a fiendish plot
orchestrated by Jewish bankers in New York, Jewish Bolsheviks seized power in
Russia. Citing A. Dikys anti-Semitic classic, The Jews in Russia and the USSR
(1976), Barkashov maintains that of the 556 persons who took over the top party
and state positions in the new Bolshevik state, a total of 448 were Jews, with most
of the rest being Latvians, Armenians and so forth. There were practically no
Russians among the early Bolshevik leaders.21
These so-called genocidal Jews who had seized power in Russia, according to
the program, then set about uprooting Russians and Slavs in vast numbers, eventually slaughtering some one hundred million of them. While this crime was being
perpetrated, a healthy development was, by contrast, occurring in Germany,
where a vibrant German National Socialist movement had come to power under
Adolf Hitler. Determined at all costs to thwart this development, the Jewish financial oligarchy of the United States and Great Britain organized the Second World
War in order to prevent the rebirth of the German nation. Cunningly, the Jews of
New York and London succeeded in pitting two brother Aryan peoples, the Germans and Slavs, against one another. The end result of this plot was the utter
destruction of German National Socialism and the continued enslavement of the
Russian and Slavic peoples of the USSR.
Today, following Gorbachevs perestroika and the fall of the Communists,
Russia remains under the direst threat of extinction. The international financial
oligarchy, directly ruled by Jews from Israel and the United States, seeks rapaciously to plunder Russias natural wealth and to turn its people into cheap manual labor deprived of any rights. That the United States is ruled by Jews is selfevident to Barkashov, who observes that the pro-Zionist coalition in the U.S.
Congress has reached 75-80 percent of the senators and approximately 60 percent of the members of the House of Representatives.22 A certain Jim Warren, a
self-declared American nationalist and leader of the League for the Defense of
Christians USA, confided to Russkii poryadok during a visit to Russia that the
United States was indeed harshly ruled by anti-national forces. As proof, Warren cited the alleged fact that in Clintons government, Jews and Negroes make
up 55 percent of the total. American nationalists, Warren noted, were pinning
their hopes on like-minded brethren in Russia. Never lose your faith in God, he
exhorted, in yourselves, or in your people. . . . God is with us.23
525
526
DEMOKRATIZATSIYA
must, by law, Barkashov asserts, make up at least that percentage of all state and
social structures, the mass media, cultural organizations, and so forth. Because
the Russian birth rate is currently low, the minority peoples of the republic must
be prohibited by law from having a higher birth rate than Russians.
But who qualifies as a Russian or triune Slav? That question, obviously, is
one of riveting concern to the racially obsessed RNYe leadership. To become a
member of the RNYe, one must first prove that one is a racially pure Slav, free
of the smallest admixture of Jewish, gypsy, Caucasus, or Central Asian blood.
Such mongrels cannot in any sense be considered Aryan Slavs.30 The difference
between being recognized as a Slav or as a non-Slav in a state run by the RNYe
would clearly be immense. The organization has pledged to spare no effort to protect the Russian gene pool, which has allegedly been put in direct danger by
the world Jewish conspiracy.
Politically, as has been noted, the RNYe would establish an authoritarian state
shorn of a parliament and other democratic institutions. Great emphasis would be
placed on propaganda, which would be conducted in the crass German Nazi manner. In economics, a mixed system would be introduced, including a large state
sector, but also a private sector protected by the state from foreign competitors.
Foreign policy would be aggressively defensive. Russia has no friends is a
constant RNYe refrain.
The RNYe as Avenging Christian Reapers
In their views on religion, as has been indicated, the barkashovtsy diverge notably
from the ideas of Hitler and the German National Socialists and draw close to
those of Corneliu Codreanu, founder of the interwar Romanian Legion of the
Archangel Michael and of the Iron Guard organization.31 An article on Codreanu
appeared in Russkii poryadok, and more pieces on him and on his ideas have been
promised for the future.32 In his pseudo-Orthodox mysticism, replete with visions
and revelations, Barkashov does remind one somewhat of Codreanu. For example, in his 1994 book of essays, Barkashov relates how he and his soratniki attended a religious ceremony conducted on the occasion of the transfer of the relics of
St. Serafim of Sarov back to Diveevo in 1991. While the church bells chimed,
Barkashov and those present, he writes, saw a mystical rose-colored and
absolutely geometrically correct swastika appear in the cloudless sky. An eightyfive-year old elder or starets then proceeded to bless Barkashov and his followers, saying, You are needed, you are reapers (zhnetsy).33 Indeed, the RNYe
could in the future serve as reapers in a most bloody harvest.
While he is a self-declared Christian, Barkashov evidences little attachment to
the majority of the bishops of the present-day Russian Orthodox Church whom
his organization dismisses as for the most part Zionist-Masons.34 The
barkashovtsy were outraged at the neutral stance taken by Patriarch Alexi II and
other church leaders at the time of the October events of 1993. Have you forgotten, Holy Fathers, the RNYe newspaper asked indignantly, what faith you
serve, and have you forgotten what peoplewhat faith and what nationality
crucified the Son of God, Jesus Christ? A reference was then made to Jewish rit-
527
ual murders allegedly perpetrated against Orthodox Christians.35 The anti-Semitic Metropolitan Ioann of Petersburg, the second-ranking hierarch of the Russian
Church until his death in November 1995, who publicly defended the authenticity of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was, on the other hand, warmly praised
by Barkashov as the incarnation of our spiritual strivings.36
An article by a certain Captain S.V. Rogozhin that was included in
Barkashovs book The ABCs of a Russian Nationalist asserts that Jesus Christ,
his mother Mary, and all of the disciples (except Judas Iscariot) were not Jews,
but in fact Galileans, a non-Jewish people.37 The Basic Principles of the Program of the Movement, which is also included in Barkashovs book, emphasizes
that freedom of religious expression will be tolerated in Russia only in that measure to which it strengthens the spiritual forces of Russians.38
Could the RNYe Come to Power?
The previously mentioned independent scholar Vladimir Pribylovsky has
observed, correctly in my opinion, that the RNYe, whatever its public claims, has
little chance of coming to power through the ballot box. The organizations
extreme ultranationalism and overt racism have, the Russian polls show, limited
appeal for the contemporary electorate. It should be noted, however, that in a
March-April 1995 Russia-wide survey taken by the polling organization
VTsIOM, which asked respondents the question, Which party is likely to win
the next Duma election? the barkashovtsy came in third with 11.4 percent, trailing only the Communists (29.7 percent) and Zhirinovskys party (18.8 percent),
and ahead of Grigory Yavlinskys Yabloko (11.2 percent) and Yegor Gaidars Russias Choice (10.8 percent).39 The RNYe, however, decided not to compete as an
organization in the December 1995 Duma elections. Barkashov announced in
October 1995 that he had decided to run for a single-mandate seat in the December 1995 Duma elections, but later that month declared at an RNYe party conference that he would in fact not be running because he considered such an effort
beneath his dignity. On 29 January 1996, Barkashov announced that he would be
seeking the Russian presidency in the June elections.40 His bid for the presidency collapsed when he failed to submit a signature list to the Central Election Commission by the 16 April deadline; two days later NTV reported that Barkashov
was supporting Yeltsin for the presidency and was warning that the election of
Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov would lead to civil war.41
The RNYes best chance to achieve power, Vladimir Pribylovsky believes,
would be through some form of military coup.42 But is there a chance of such
a coup being successful? The RNYe has, of course, been actively and intensively courting the military since its founding in 1990, and it does apparently
include in its number a significant number of retired military personnel and at
least some officers and soldiers on active duty. A letter to Russkii poryadok from
a Colonel V.I. Terentev of the Paratroops, an officer with the General Staff,
asserted in 1994: In the General Staff, a majority of the officers read your
newspaper Russkii poryadok, and many in the high command share your
views.43 Barkashov has asserted that the RNYe counts active army generals
528
DEMOKRATIZATSIYA
529
NOTES
1. In Izvestiya, 30 July 1993, 5. For Barkashovs biography, see also Trud, 5 November 1993, 5; Sovetskaya Rossiya, 5 March 1994, 4; Moskovskie novosti, 15, 1994, 7A; and
Russkii poryadok, nos. 45, 1994, 1.
2. Moskovsky komsomolets, 6 October 1993, 4.
3. Shchit i mech, 3, 20 January 1994, 3.
4. In The Economist, 28 January 1995, 2123.
5. Izvestiya, 30 July 1993, 5.
6. See Moskovsky komsomolets, 5 May 1994; 1 and 11 May 1995, 2.
7. Inform-600 sekund, 002, July 1994, 45.
8. See Izvestiya, 5 January 1994, 7, and 25 March 1994, 5.
9. Izvestiya, 6 October 1993, 1.
10. In Megapolis-ekspress, 12, 6 April 1994, 7.
11. Sovetskaya Rossiya, 4 March 1994, 4.
12. In Zavtra, 12, March 1994, 12.
13. Moskovskie novosti, 1522 January 1995, 4.
14. For the FSB spravka, see Moskovsky komsomolets, 11 May 1995, 2.
15. Ibid.
16. See Ogonek, 11, March 1995, 1820.
17. In Prizyv (Vladimir), 22 March 1995, 2, 3.
18. Ogonek, 11, 1995, 1820.
19. See Novoe vremya, 35, 1994, 1417, and Izvestiya, 18 August 1994, 5.
20. In Izvestiya, 18 August 1994, 5.
21. Alexander Barkashov, Azbuka Russkogo Natsionalista (Moscow: Slovo-1, 1994),
28 and 75.
22. Ibid., 11.
23. Russkii poryadok, 3, 21 May 1993, 23.
24. Barkashov, Azbuka, 59 and 6566.
25. Ibid., 46
26. Inform-600 sekund, 002, July 1994, 45.
27. See Moskovskie novosti, 15, 1994, 7A.
28. See Barkashovs comments in Stavropolskaya gazeta, 27 September 1994, 1.
29. Moskovskie novosti, 1522 January 1995, 4.
30. Moskovskie novosti, 15, 1994, 7A.
31. On Codreanu, see F.L. Carsten, The Rise of Fascism (Berkeley and Los Angeles:
University of California Press, 1969), 18193, and Hans Rogger and Eugen Weber, eds.,
The European Right (Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1965),
50174.
32. Russkii poryadok, 23, 1994, 8.
33. Barkashov, Azbuka. . ., 9698.
34. Moskovskie novosti, 15, 1994, 7A.
35. Russkii poryadok, 9, 1993; 1, 1994, 78.
36. Inform-600 sekund, 002, July 1994, 45. On the late Metropolitan Ioann of Petersburg, see my essays, The Russian Orthodox Church as an Empire-Saving Institution
in Michael Bourdeaux, ed., The Politics of Religion in Russia and the New States of Eurasia (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1995), 1540, and Orthodoxy and National Identity in
Russia in Victoria Bonnell, ed., Identities in Transition: Gender, Class, Religion, Nationality and Politics in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union (Berkeley, CA: Center
for Slavic and East European Studies, forthcoming 1996).
37. Barkashov, Azbuka, 6871.
38. Ibid., 99104.
39. See Transition, 8 September 1995, 3235.
40. Moskovsky komsomolets, 20 October 1995, 3, and OMRI Daily Digest, 30 January 1996.
530
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
DEMOKRATIZATSIYA
OMRI Daily Digest, 19 April 1996.
Moskovsky komsomolets, 11 May 1995, 2.
Russkii poryadok, 23, 1994, 4.
Sovetskaya Rossiya, 5 March 1994, 4.
Moskovsky komsomolets, 11 May 1995, 2.
Moscow News, 50, 1622 December 1994, 12.
See Moskovsky komsomolets, 5 May 1995, 3.