Suspension
Suspension
Suspension
BYBIMAL PUROHIT(ME13M1005)
SHEDOLKAR PRAVIN(ME13M1013)
VIKRAM B.(ME13M1006)
SIVAKOTESHWAR RAO(ME13M1014)
APARNA GANGELE(ME13P1006)
Y PRASATH REDDY(ME10B042)
PROJECT TOPIC
SUSPENSION SYSTEM IN
AUTOMOBILE SYSTEM
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to thank Dr Ashok Kumar
Pandey sir and Veerbhadra reddy sir for
providing us this opportunity and helping us in
this project.
INTRODUCTION
A vehicle suspension system is a complex vibration system
having multiple degrees of freedom . The purpose of the
suspension system is to isolate the vehicle body from the road
inputs.
Suspension systems serve a dual purpose
Contributing to the vehicle's road holding/handling
and braking for good active safety and driving pleasure, and
Keeping vehicle occupants comfortable and reasonably well
isolated from road noise, bumps, and vibrations,etc.
MOTIVATION
Study of Suspension system aims at benefiting1:- Ride comfort
2:- Long life of vehicle
3:-Stability of vehicle
TYPES OF SUSPENSIONS
Passive Suspensions-
SEMI-ACTIVE SUSPENSION
Semi-active suspensions include devices such as air springs and switchable
shock absorbers, various self-leveling solutions, as well as systems
like hydro pneumatic , hydro Elastic, and hydragas suspensions.
ACTIVE SUSPENSION
Fully active suspension systems use electronic monitoring of vehicle
conditions, coupled with the means to impact vehicle suspension and
behavior in real time to directly control the motion of the car.
Mathematical Modeling
Parameters
(M1) 1/4 bus body mass
(M2) suspension mass
2500 kg
320 kg
Control force
Mathematical model
Amplitude vs time(s)
With Bump
Control System
Requirement
Ex When Bus run 10 cm high bus body
should not oscillate more than +/- 5 mm and
stop oscillating with in 5 sec
Result
MATLAB
SIMULINK
Wn1
5.1399
5.1403
4.9676
Wn2
6.5251
6.5252
6.1681
First mode
-2.0963
-2.0957
Second mode
0.5963
0.5965
SECOND MODE :
FIRST MODE :
SECOND MODE :
Using Cramers rule and applying the principle of superposition , we can find
the transfer functions for both bounce and pitch motions for each input Y1
and Y2
Transfer function =
Transfer function =
Transfer function =
Transfer function =
SIMULINK MODEL :
BLOCK DIAGRAM
MATHEMATICAL EQUATIONS
PARAMETERS USED
RESULTS
SYSTEM MODELER
COMPARISON RESULTS
S_RELATIVE(SPRING)
S_RELATIVE(DAMPER)
V_RELATIVE
FORCE
FORCE(DAMPER)
STABILITY
OBSERVATION
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONS
CONCLUSION
The various observations made during the project
clearly indicate that the preference priority level for
suspensions is
1:- Active suspension
2:- Semi-active suspension
3:- Passive suspension
The results also indicated that a stability system is also
required for better overall performance of the vehicle.
FUTURE WORK
Control system should include the use of delta delay function.
More emphasis should be made on developing a cheap Active
suspension system
Also considerations should be given to the stability effect of
the suspension system on the vehicle.
REFRENCES
Chaotic vibration of a nonlinear full-vehicle model ,Qin Zhu, , Mitsuaki
Ishitobi
The Automotive Chasis, volume 2, System Design, Giancarlo Genta and
Lorenzo Morello
Adaptive fuzzy controller with sliding surface for vehicle suspension
control , Shiuh-Jer Huang Wei-Cheng Lin
Chaotic vibration of a nonlinear quarter -vehicle model, Jiang Lixia Li
Wanxiang
Active suspension control of ground vehicle based on a full-vehicle
model, Ikenaga, S Lewis, F.L. ; Campos, J. ; Davis, L.
Matlab R2010a
Catia 2010
Solid Edge 2010
Solid Works 2013
Blender 2013