Capacity Spectrum
Capacity Spectrum
Capacity Spectrum
METHOD
Purdue University
CE571 - Earthquake Engineering
Spring 2002
Mete A. Sozen and Luis E. Garca
Reference:
Freeman, S. A., (1990), On the Correlation of
Code Forces to Earthquake Demands,
Proceedings of the 4th US-Japan Workshop
on Improvements of Building Structural
Design and Construction Practices (ATC 153), Kailua-Kona, Hawaii.
Acceleration-Displacement
Spectra
O
Acceleration-Displacement Spectra
Push-Over Analysis
O
Push-Over Analysis
O
Push-Over Analysis
O
A
E
0
F
G
Displacement
Push-Over Analysis
O
Push-Over Analysis
140
120
100
80
Analytical
Test B
Test 0
60
40
20
0
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Push-Over Example
beam section
0.3 x 0.4 m
Vs
3m
B
column section
0.5 x 0.5 m
6m
wall section
0.15 x 1 m
Push-Over Example
300
Moment (kN . m)
250
200
Column
Beam Positive
Beam Negative
Wall
150
100
50
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
-3
60
70
Push-Over Example
Beam yields
in positive
moment
Step 1
Column
yields
Step 4
Wall cracks
Step 2
Column
yields
Step 5
Wall yields
Step 3
Beam yields
in negative
moment
Step 6
Push-Over Example
350
Stage 6
300
Stage 5
Collapse
mechanism
forms
250
Stage 4
200
Stage 3
150
100
50
Stage 2
Stage 1
0
0
10
15
20
25
Tef f
Ve/W
CAPACITY
push-over curve
elastic demand
V/W
eff
strength demand
DEMAND
Acceleratio-displacement spectra
=5%
=20%
=2%
Sd
displacement demand
eff = 0 + 0.05
O
Sa
Bilinear representation
of capacity
S am
S ay
Area = Maximum
strain energy
S dy
Kef f
S dm
Sd
1 ED
0 =
4 ES
Where ED corresponds to the energy dissipated by
the hysteretic damping corresponding to the area
of the shaded parallelogram in previous figure.
1
ES = ( Sam Sdm )
2
Sa
(0)
=2%
=5%
=10%
=20%
0
Sd
Sa
Teff (1)
eff (1)
(0)
(1)
=2%
=5%
=10%
=20%
0
Sd
Tinitial
Sa
Teff (2)
eff (1)
(0)
(1)
(2)
eff (2)
=2%
=5%
=10%
=20%
1 2
Sd
Tinitial
Sa
Teff (2)
Teff
eff (1)
(0)
(1)
(2)
eff (2)
=2%
=5%
=10%
=20%
1 2 m
Sd
Tinitial
Sa
Teff (2)
Teff
eff (1)
(0)
(1)
(2)
eff (2)
1 2 m
Sd