Valvula FIRE y Catia
Valvula FIRE y Catia
Valvula FIRE y Catia
1 2011
1. Introduction
The simulation tests of the airflow through the throttle of a Wankel engine will be to assess the
state of the dynamic phenomena in the throttle module and to determine the relationship of a mass
flow rate as a function of a throttle opening angle. These simulations are prior to the actual
modification of a Wankel engine to be hydrogen powered. The engine inlet system whose part is
the throttle module will be also equipped with an injector adapter. The measurements of the
electronic throttle module and the geometry of the injector adapter were used to build the research
model.
2. Wankel engine throttle geometric model
The geometric model for the throttle module is made in Catia v5. The geometry of the model
includes a throttle module throat, a throttle and an injector adapter (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Throttle module made in Catia v5
Model
1
Angle
[] 20.00
Proportional
[%] 15.66
opening
2
30.00
3
40.00
4
50.00
5
60.00
6
70.00
7
75.00
8
80.00
9
90.00
27.71
39.76
51.81
63.86
75.90
81.93
87.95 100.00
Due to the complex geometry, the number of elements in a mesh varies according to a throttle
position. The adopted computing mesh has 150 75.000 elements (Table 2). To demonstrate
varying computational conditions with respect to different cases, the elements have a fixed
maximum size of 2.5 mm. The mesh mainly consists of tetrahedral elements. Figure 2 shows the
mesh for one of the nine cases.
Tab. 2. The number of elements
Model
Elements 150574 106068 76640 91150 79642 80371 78641 79916 75441
The same boundary conditions and assumptions about the model have been adopted for all of
the cases:
- adiabatic walls (no heat exchange with the medium)
- compressible flow,
- k-zeta-f turbulence model,
- the air in the model is of the following properties:
density under NTP conditions
1.18415
kg/m3,
dynamic viscosity
1.81 e-05
kg/ms,
specific heat
100362
J/kg K,
thermal conductivity
0.02637
W/m K,
molecular weight
28.96
kg/kmol.
The simulation was carried out using the option steady, which means that the temperature and
airflow did not change during the simulation. To map the actual conditions precisely, the following
boundary conditions have been adopted:
- pressure at the model inlet
100
kPa,
- inlet-outlet pressure
99.7
kPa.
678
Flow Simulation Through Wankel Engine Throttle Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
All of the calculations for each model were carried out not later than the mass flow rate in the
inlet settled. Due to the different positions of the throttle, the number of iterations in the various
cases ranged from 600 to 4000. Figure 4 shows the course of the mass flow rate as a function of
the number of iterations (refers to the 50 throttle opening).
Fig. 4. The inlet system mass flow rate
Fig. 5. Pressure distribution in the throttle cross- section for the angle of 20
679
Fig. 6. Pressure distribution in the throttle cross- section for the angle of 40
Fig. 9. Pressure distribution in the throttle cross- section for the angle of 90
Figures 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 present the velocity distribution for a longitudinal section for several
successive throttle positions. As for the pressure distribution, the same throttle opening angles, i.e.
20, 40, 60, 80 and 90 were analyzed. The maximum velocity value in the throttle module is
36 m/s, which is given in Figure 14. It should be noted that a small change in a cross section where
the throttle is mounted limits the higher velocity airflow area. Smaller throttle opening angles
cause the uneven distribution of velocity areas, which is connected with some turbulence in the
model.
Fig. 10. Velocity distribution in the throttle cross-section for the angle of 20
Fig. 11. Velocity distribution in the throttle cross-section for the angle of 40
680
Flow Simulation Through Wankel Engine Throttle Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
Fig. 12. Velocity distribution in the throttle cross-section for the angle of 60
Fig. 13. Velocity distribution in the throttle cross-section for the angle of 80
Fig. 14. Velocity distribution in the throttle cross-section for the angle of 90
Figures 15 and 16 present the distribution of stream lines for a longitudinal section for
the two throttle positions, i.e. 50 and 60. The authors have chosen these throttle angles on
purpose because the airflow stabilizes just at the change from 50 to 60. The turbulence
(see Figure 15) occurs for smaller throttle opening angles. This phenomenon is useful since
the fuel-air mixture can be pre-mixed before it reaches the cylinder. However, if a throttle
is much loaded and maximally opened, a lot of mixture needs to be supplied where
turbulence is not so necessary and exist no longer.
Fig. 15. Stream line distribution in the throttle cross-section for the angle 50
Fig. 16. Stream line distribution in the throttle cross-section for the angle 60
Based on the calculations, the relationship between the inlet pipe mass flow rate and the
throttle opening angle was determined (Fig. 17). At a given pressure difference between the inlet
and outlet, the maximum value of 24.66 g/s was obtained.
681
Fig. 17. Dependence of the mass flow rate on the angle of the throttle position
4. Conclusion
Based on the simulations, the maximum airflow velocity was 36 m/s. Based on the generated
stream lines, it was found that the turbulence disappears when the throttle opening angle of 60 is
crossed. Another conclusion is that for full throttle the velocity at the pipe walls decreases to about
12 m/s. The highest velocity throughout the model occurs just where the throttle is mounted.
References
[1] Bogensperger, M., Ban, M., Priesching, P., Tatschl, R., Modeling of Premixed SI-Engine
Combustion Using AVL FIRE A Validation Study, International Multidimensional Engine
Modeling Users Group Meeting at the SAE Congress April 13, Detroit 2008.
[2] Puntigam, W., Uphoff, U., Fogt, H., Numerical and experimental investigation of flow
characteristics around throttle plates, European Automotive Congress, Bratislava 2001.
[3] Tatschl, R., Basara, B., Schneider, J., Hanjalic, K., Popovac, M., Brohmer, A., Mehring, J.,
Advanced Turbulent Heat Transfer Modeling for IC-Engine Applications Using AVL FIRE,
International Multidimensional Engine Modeling Users Group Meeting April 2, Detroit
2006.
682