Divine Discourses Vol - 11
Divine Discourses Vol - 11
Divine Discourses Vol - 11
Volume 11
CONTENTS
1. STRESS ON THE CONTEMPORARY INCARNATION
1
Conquer Ego and Jealousy ................................................................... 1
Approach Satguru in Middle Age......................................................... 2
2. AUTHORITIES OF KNOWLEDGE
5
Essence of Mahavaakyas ...................................................................... 5
Conclusion ............................................................................................ 7
3. THE INCARNATION SEVERELY TESTS DEVOTEES
9
Lord Rama Is the Ideal for Family Life................................................ 9
Hanuman is the Ideal for Spiritual Life ................................................ 9
Miracles Do Not Indicate God............................................................ 10
Severe Tests of Faith .......................................................................... 10
4. MAINTAINING NIVRITTI AND PRAVRITTI SIMULTANEOUSLY 12
Type 1: People for Whom Pravritti is the Only Goal ......................... 12
Type 2: People for Whom Nivrutti is the Only Goal ......................... 12
Type 3: People Who Maintain Both Nivrutti and Pravritti ................ 13
5. UNDERSTANDING SHANKARAS PHILOSPHY IN THE CONTEXT
OF HIS TIME
15
Subtle Actions of the Incarnation Reveal Greatest Knowledge ......... 15
6. COSMIC ENERGY CREATED WORLD BY GODS WILL
18
Enjoying Even Unpleasantness is the Highest State .......................... 18
7. BASICS OF NIVRUTTI
21
Follow Pravrutti to Avoid Gods Fury ............................................... 21
8. IMAGINABLE AWARENESS DIFFERENT FROM UNIMAGINABLE
GOD
24
Little Similarity; Huge Difference...................................................... 24
9. THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF SPIRITUAL EFFORT
27
Do Not Mind Doing Adharma If the Incarnation Demands............... 27
Recognition of Human Incarnation .................................................... 29
10. GOD DID NOT MODIFY INTO CREATION
31
The Effect Does Not Exist in the Cause ............................................. 31
11. TRANSFORMATION THROUGH KNOWLEDGE IS THE
GREATEST
33
Special Talent of God in Answering Spontaneously.......................... 33
12. MEANING OF THE GAYATHRY MANTRA
35
Spontaneous Liking and Feeling for God ........................................... 35
13. INNER MEANING OF SHRI CHAKRA
37
1
conquer of egoism and jealousy by the spiritual aspirant towards a cohuman form.
The path of rituals denotes the absence of knowledge due to the
absence of alive human form of God. The rituals involved the sacrifice of
valuable materials for the sake of God. These materials are either wasted
or stolen by the priests, business men and managements. Valuable food
materials like ghee is burnt in fire and milk, honey, fruit juice, etc. are
wasted in bathing the statues. This clearly shows full ignorance but the
merit is that sacrifice for God is developed. The wastage of materials is
inevitable because the aspirant has not yet conquered the egoism and
jealousy to recognize the alive human form of God, who has come down to
the earth to enjoy your sacrifice of such valuable materials in His worship
to bless you. Such sacrifice of materials is the proof of practical devotion.
You prove your deep love by such practical sacrifice towards your beloved
family members and hence, there is no debate in this point. In the first
stage, such practical sacrifice is done by the human beings based on the
business to give and take. The sacrifice of wealth and materials is for
getting some benefits in return from God. In the initial stage, God also
becomes a business man like Lord Venkateswara on seven hills. In course
of time, the devotees are expected to develop real love to God by which the
same practical sacrifice is done without aspiring anything in return. When
this is achieved, the training of the human being in the ritualistic path is
completed. Now, if the egoism and jealousy towards a co-human form is
also achieved by doing such practical sacrifice of materials to poor
devotees, the time to catch the contemporary human incarnation has come.
Now, the human being should analyze the real and relevant address of God
through reasoning. Buddha said that without analysis, blind acceptance of
even scripture and tradition is of no use. The scripture is already a wellsettled conclusion of long logical debates. But, unfortunately, the wrong
interpretation of the scripture is always developed through bad logic. This
bad logic must be rejected by good logic, which is the reasonable process of
reasoning. Therefore, when Buddha said that you should not accept the
scripture blindly, means that you should not accept blindly the wrong
interpretation of the scripture.
Krishna in Her earlier part of middle age. The people, who are not diverted
towards Satguru, continue to worship the models of energetic forms of
angels and departed ancestors through the blind rituals. When the Satguru is
achieved, these rituals (karma) naturally get dropped as stated in the Gita
(Jnate karma na vidyate). The ritual (karma) is converted into practical
service to Satguru (karma yoga). The word yoga denotes the lucky
achievement of God in human form. There can be no better yoga than
this. Yoga means fortunate achievement. Putra yoga means fortunate
achievement of children. Dhana yoga means fortunate achievement of
wealth. Yoga means the real achievement, which is the fortunate
achievement of God in alive human form. The Gita is called as the yoga
shastra because it is the real achievement of God in alive human form
called as Krishna.
Therefore, the norms for achievement of God are
1) The development of practical sacrifice without aspiring anything in
return and
2) the victory over egoism and jealousy to recognize the contemporary
human incarnation.
The first is achieved during the path of karma and the second is
achieved during the path of knowledge just before the diversion from south
to north. The word DATTA actually means that God is given to the
human beings by Himself through human form in every human generation.
If the yoga is not achieved in this human life, such opportunity may be even
impossible in the future births. Such fortunate attainment is the real
meaning of yoga and without knowing this, people waste time in breathing
exercises and other physical exercises. Of course, such exercises are also
good for the mental and the physical health of the body, which is essential
in the service of God in the human form. A sick and weak person cannot
serve God. Hence, yoga starts with such achievement of good health and
this preliminary state is included in the beginning of yoga. Control of mind
and senses also helps to attain good health. But, if you stop yoga after
attaining good health, it is only a topic of medical science and not spiritual
knowledge. This state is like passing the entrance examination to achieve a
seat in a professional college. The career is not stopped by simply joining
the professional college. You have to put hard work in getting a distinction
in the professional degree to achieve the final fruit. Such professional
degree or the latter part of yoga starts with the recognition of alive human
form of God and serving It. The Gita is such latter part of yoga to help the
human being to catch the alive human form of God. The readers of the
Gita catch Krishna as God and worship the statue or photo of Krishna and
3
they have come back again to the pavilion! Such unfortunate situation is
due to lack of victory over egoism and jealousy towards a co-human form.
Such people are again like Jambavan, the bear devotee, who worshipped the
statue of Rama and could not recognize Krishna in person. The bear
represents the rigid ignorant nature of foolish grip without analysis. When
Krishna said that He was God, it means that every alive human form of God
in every human generation is God. Similarly, when Jesus said that one can
reach the Father through Him only, it means that one can see God through
the contemporary human incarnation only. Again, the Christian devotees
are like that Jambavan only. This is the reason behind the statement of
Buddha that reasoning should be done in every step. The followers of
Krishna and Jesus have reached the final state in recognizing the human
form of God, but went back to the original place due to lack of reasoning in
the final state. It is like the state of an un-fortunate student, who did well in
all internal examinations throughout the year and was allowed to the final
examination. But, if he fails in the final examination due to negligence and
he comes back to the same class again in the next year. Therefore,
reasoning should not be missed at any stage. You travelled all along the
path with the help of the glowing torch light and reached the goal. But
unfortunately, your torch light failed as soon as the goal is received. What
is the use of your entire long journey? It becomes a sheer waste. You are as
good as the person, who has not travelled all along the path.
AUTHORITIES OF KNOWLEDGE
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[January 16, 2011] To accept any concept, there are four authorities:
1) Shruti, the scripture, which is the divine text and it is the Veda for
Hindus.
2) The second authority is Smruti, which is the text written by sages.
3) The third authority is logical discussion to find out the correct
interpretation of the scripture.
4) The fourth authority is experience of divine scholars.
Essence of Mahavaakyas
Shruti
Let us examine the first authority, the Veda, which is said to be the
word of God revealed to sages. In this scripture, lot of importance is given
to the four great statements (Mahavaakyaas). One statement says that the
special knowledge is God (Prajnanam Brahma). The special knowledge
cannot mean simple awareness, which is found in animals and birds. The
word jnanam means knowledge and not mere awareness. Awareness is
the basic material but knowledge is the special design of it. When you
appreciate a golden jewel, the appreciation for the specialty is related to the
design of the golden chain and not to the basic gold. You do not appreciate
a lump of gold. The word Pra denotes the Specialty and the word
jnanam denotes the Knowledge. The word Knowledge eliminates all
the living beings other than human beings because only human beings
possess and express knowledge. The word Pra indicates a rare special
human being only, who is possessor of the special knowledge. The result is
that a specific human being, who is the possessor and preacher of the
special knowledge alone can be God like Krishna, who preached the Gitathe special knowledge.
When you say that a king is ruling the country, the word king cannot
mean every living being and you cannot say that an animal or a bird is
ruling the country. The word king also cannot mean every human being
because every human being cannot have the special talent of administration
to rule the entire country. Hence, the word king indicates a specially
5
talented human being only. This statement also indicates that the main
purpose of God to come as a human being is to preach the special
knowledge only. Another statement says that an individual human being is
God (Ayamaatma Brahma). The word Atmaa means not only the
awareness, but also the external human body. Atmaa means that which
pervades. The awareness pervades the body through nerves. Awareness is
the neural energy flowing in the nerves. The body also pervades the space
as it grows. Therefore, the word Atmaa stands for the human being, which
is the human body along with the awareness. The three statements saying
that I am God, You are God and He is God denote only the aspiration
that everybody should become God in the near future. The verbs in present
tense like am, are and is stand for the present tense indicating the
immediate future as per the grammar. These three statements also mean
that the human form of God is like Me, you and him for external look.
Since God looks like an ordinary human being externally, these three
statements indicate the aspect of similarity. The fourth statement brings the
difference, which says that God is the Special Knowledge. The possessor
of knowledge can be called as the knowledge itself, when the knowledge
excels in the possessor as per the grammar. Therefore knowledge means the
possessor of knowledge. According to lakshana, the possessor can be called
by the possessor material. A seller of apples is called as apples. All these
four statements indicate the human incarnation only.
The word Narayana referred in the Veda means the source of
knowledge. The Veda says that Narayana spreads all over the world
(vyaapya Naraayanah). It means that the knowledge preached by the Lord
is spreading all over the world. Another Vedic statement saying that this
entire world is God (Sarvam khalvidam) also means the same. The
country ruled by the king, Kalinga, is called as Kalinga only. The region
spread by the rule of Kalinga is called as Kalinga. This does not mean that
the entire kingdom is the king himself in person. All these statements
indicate the knowledge of the human incarnation spreading all over the
world and this should not be misunderstood as the human incarnation
Himself becoming the entire world. In the Rudram, existing in the Veda, it
is said that God hits the people with arrows released from His bow. This
also indicates the human incarnations like Rama and Krishna, who
punished the evil people with the help of bow and arrows. Apart from that,
the bow stands for the knowledge and the arrows stands for the points. God
in human form hits everybody with His points through knowledge to kill
their ignorance. Like this, all the Vedic statements can be rightly interpreted
in the sense of human incarnation preaching the special knowledge. The
6
Veda also says that God is unimaginable, who is beyond words, mind,
intelligence and logic and hence, God alone knows God (Brahmavit
Brahmaiva...). You should know that God cannot be known
(Yasyaamatam). But, such God enters the world through a medium
(Tadevaanu Praavishat...) and God becomes that medium while keeping
His separate identity of His real form (Satchatyatcha...). Therefore, the
essence of the Veda is very clear that the absolute God is unimaginable, He
enters a human being as a medium for the sake of preaching knowledge and
He remains in His original form and at the same time gets identified with
the human form also.
Smruti
The second authority is Smruti, which is, the text written by sages
consisting of the three great epics dealing with the human incarnations like
Rama and Krishna.
Reasoning
The third authority is reasoning, which is already taken up from the
beginning of this message. The logical analysis always helps to get the
correct interpretation of both Shruti and Smruti.
Experience of divine scholars
The fourth authority is the experience of divine scholars. Hanuman is
the greatest scholar, who learnt all the scriptures from the Sun. Gopikas are
also the incarnations of great sages, who are the greatest scholars of the
scriptures. Both Hanuman and Gopikas worshipped the contemporary
human incarnations only and not the statues of energetic forms of God or
the past human incarnations. Hanuman never worshipped the statues of past
human incarnations like Parashurama and Vamana or the statues of
energetic forms like Shiva and Vishnu. Similarly, Gopikas did not worship
the statues of Rama or the statues of Vishnu and Shiva.
Conclusion
Therefore, all the four authorities clearly indicate that human beings
should worship the human form of God only for the salvation. The
energetic forms of God are meant only for the energetic forms of departed
souls in the upper worlds. It is not the question of right and wrong, but it
is a question of relevance and irrelevance. We do not say that the
energetic form is wrong for human beings. We only say that the energetic
form is irrelevant and human form of God is relevant for the human beings.
When you worship the energetic forms, you have to either concentrate on
7
the imagined form in mind, which is very difficult or you have to worship
the statue of the energetic form. We cannot serve the imagined form. In the
case of a statue, the service becomes waste. But, if you take the human
form of God, all your service is enjoyed by God and becomes fruitful. The
only obstruction to the alive human form of God is the ego and jealousy
towards a co-human form. You may accept the concept of human
incarnation, but, if your ego and jealousy are not completely eradicated,
you will worship only the statues of past human incarnations only and not
the present alive form of God. Thus, for a human being, everything is
concentrated on the contemporary human incarnation only.
towards His wife on another occasion also by saying that He would go back
without killing Ravana if His wife were returned back to Him. This showed
that Rama was not bothered about the atrocities of Ravana that would
continue after returning Sita. This showed that He was not interested in the
welfare of the world and was only interested in His wife. Hanuman did not
misunderstand Rama in that situation. Later, Rama fell unconscious, when
He was hit by the Nagaastra1 and Hanuman revived Him by bringing
Garuda from heaven. Even after this, Hanuman did not mistake Rama to be
an ordinary human being. All this shows that you will be severely tested by
God in human form regarding your faith in Him.
Another important aspect that you have to learn from Hanuman is that
you should not feel you are God simply by achieving some miraculous
powers. Hanuman had all the miraculous powers. For instance, he had
jumped and crossed the ocean. He had also lifted a huge hill in his hands
and had flown with it all the way to Lanka. Rama on the other hand,
behaved like a helpless human being and crossed the sea only by
constructing a bridge. Yet, Hanuman did not mistake Rama to be a human
being. Therefore, miracles should not be the identity mark for recognizing
God in human form. Even demons can perform miracles. Therefore, you
should behave like Rama in your family life and should behave like
Hanuman in your spiritual life. Both are perfect examples in the
simultaneous dual roles of Rama and Hanuman.
In the epic battle between Rama and Ravana, Ravanas son Indrajit shot the dreaded weapon, Nagastra (Cobra weapon)
at Rama and Lakshmana that left both the brothers unconscious. Hanuman brought Garuda, the Divine Eagle from the
heavens, to free the two brothers from the clutches of the Naagastra.
10
Pravrutti is the worldly path, in which the individual interacts and behaves with other human beings in a just manner; it
does not pertain to God and ones interaction with God. Ones interaction and behavior towards God is the spiritual path
or Nivrutti.
3
A special world called the Goloka was created by the Lord for the Gopikas, who were the highest devotees of Lord
Krishna. This is the fifteenth world and is higher than the Brahma Loka which was the highest heaven.
4
When the Mahabharata war was over.
5
One of the characters in the Mahabharata. Mother of three of the Pandava brothers, including Arjuna.
11
Pravritti is behavior towards family and soceity, Nivritti is devotional service done to the Lord.
12
Instead of trying to concentrate on the Absolute Unimginable God, which is clearly impossible, they should recognize
that the same God has come through a medium, especially the medium of a human body (mediated God).
3
The state or ashrama (Sanskrit) means the state of a householder or the state of a celibate saint.
13
human incarnation. Hanuman took the side of the mother and fought with
Rama. He realized the mistake in the end. In the next incarnation as Adi
Shankara, He rectified the mistake by leaving His mother for the sake of
God4. Both Hanuman and Adi Shankara were incarnations of the same Lord
Shiva. Therefore, the Bhagavatam is the most sacred book for the
householders aspiring for salvation. When Parikshit, a householder asked
sage Shuka for salvation, the sage preached the Bhagavatam to him5.
The first type of people will reach heaven for a temporary trip and
will come back. The second type of people will never attain the goal and
will always keep wandering in the path without reaching the goal. The third
type of people taking the Gopikas as an example will certainly reach the
goal. In fact, the Gopikas reached Goloka, which is higher than Brahma
Loka, the goal. This shows the special appreciation of the Lord for the
Gopikas, who never insulted pravritti and achieved nivritti without any
clash, by their talented dealing. The third section of people should avoid the
clash between pravritti and nivritti as far as possible. But if God creates the
clash, they should behave like Shankara and not like Hanuman. Please
remember that Hanuman is not a real failure. He only acted in that way to
preach the concept. Otherwise, Hanuman Himself is God or the ultimate
goal.
14
17
the end in which all His sons and grandsons killed each other. He enjoyed
even His death with a sweet smile while His foot was continuously
bleeding hit by the arrow. When His father Vasudeva died, He was
externally weeping, but internally enjoys that process of weeping also.
Krishna said that He is like the white thread running through different gems
with different colours (sutre maniganaa iva Gita). The thread may
become black, red, green, etc. while running through the gems of such
colours. But, if the white thread is taken out, it appears white only. The
colours that appeared on the thread are external only and the white colour
of the thread was maintained in all these different colours. In fact, the white
colour only generates the seven colours. The soul is never touched by the
activities like doer, enjoyer, etc. because it is the inert (sthanuh Gita)
cosmic energy only. Even the individual soul is untouched by such
activities in the state of perfect meditation. The unimaginable God is also
not touched by such activities since the imaginable actions cannot touch the
unimaginable entity. By this common property of untouchable nature, either
the soul or the individual soul in the meditation cannot be God because, the
reason for the untouchable nature of God is His unimaginable nature
whereas, the soul and individual soul are always imaginable. Both the
unimaginable God and soul or individual soul in meditation are beyond
all such activities and hence, can enjoy the unreal world without any
involvement. But, the individual soul cannot enjoy in the state of
meditation.
Instead of becoming inert to escape the involvement in these
activities, it is better to remain as individual soul in normal state and enjoy
all the activities like the human incarnation, following the principle of
enjoying every situation realizing the unreality of the basic world. Shankara
preached this monism of continuous bliss through continuous enjoyment of
the unreal world. The cosmic energy becomes creator, ruler and destroyer
by the will of God only and hence, the unimaginable God is only the
Ultimate Creator, Ruler and Destroyer of the world. But, to enjoy the unreal
world continuously, the creatorship, rulership and destroyership are
unnecessary and hence, the limited monism between God embedded in
cosmic energy (Eshwara) and the individual soul (Jeeva) can be achieved as
per Shankara. There is no meaning in bringing monism between the soul or
individual soul and the unimaginable God because the comparison is not
possible between imaginable and unimaginable.
20
BASICS OF NIVRUTTI
Follow Pravrutti to Avoid Gods Fury
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[January 18, 2011 Evening] Human life is very important because
human being alone can understand the spiritual knowledge and can become
a devotee of God. Therefore, you must always save the life of a human
being by giving food, cloth and shelter. You must always stop the
starvation-death of a human being, be it theist or atheist. You must save the
life of even an atheist because even the atheist may be converted into theist
if the life is saved. After saving the life of the starving human being, you
must concentrate on improving the amenities of poor people so that a
peaceful life is very much essential to concentrate on God. The rich is
becoming richer and poor is becoming poorer in the present day. This will
disturb the social balance and will lead to the human explosion in the
society. When the balance of the society is disturbed, nivrutti finds no
place. Therefore, resist all the wastages that take place in the rituals. Do not
burn the ghee in the name of performing homa. Ghee is most valuable
food material. The actual homa is to put ghee in the burning fire of hunger
of a poor man. The fire of hunger is called as Vaishvanara as said in the
Gita. Similarly, dont burn the oil in the name of Deepaaraadhanam
before the statue or photo of God. The purpose of the light is only to
remove the darkness in the olden days. In the day time, the light is not
necessary. Even in the night, when the light is present supplied from the
electric bulb, the oil lamp is not necessary. You need not burn the perfumes
also, when they are not required for you.
Absolutely there is no necessity of burning anything for God. You are
only worshipping a statue or photo, which is an inert representative model
of God. Similarly, there is no need of burning dhuni in the temples of Sai
Baba. He lit dhuni in the old mosque to repel the poisonous insects,
serpents, etc. Such need is not present today in the temples. Be it a temple
or church or mosque, you must control the burning and other wastages of
materials leading to the environmental pollution, which will upset the
ecological balance resulting in several global problems. You will be
considered as a demon and not a devotee by God and you will be punished
21
by God for disturbing the balance of society. In all the temples, churches,
mosques and prayer halls of other religions, remember that only the inert
representative models of God exist and all your services to such models are
not received by God in any way except that they are meant to improve your
devotion. Of course, all these places are necessary to develop your devotion
to God. You can develop your devotion without wasting money in all these
unnecessary ignorant practices. The same money can be spent to save the
life of a hungry person and to improve the facilities of poor people so that
they can have peaceful life and turn to God. God will be pleased by such
activity and not by these foolish practices of blind tradition. As Buddha
told, you must analyze every action before implementing it and you should
not do it blindly based on tradition.
You must not kill any living being for the sake of your food. God has
given enough vegetable food that contains all the ingredients present in the
non-vegetarian food. After all, the source of ingredients of any flesh is
only vegetable kingdom only. Eating the non-vegetarian food is not a sin
because same ingredients exist in both vegetarian and non-vegetarian foods.
But, you have to kill a living being for the sake of non-vegetarian food. The
killing is the greatest sin. You may argue that you have not killed the living
being directly. Such argument cannot stand. Since you are eating the nonvegetarian food, the living being is killed. You are responsible for its
killing. Therefore, you are the principle shareholder of the sin. There is
nothing wrong if you eat a living being after its natural death. In Hinduism,
there is a sect of people called Kapalikas, who eat the dead living beings.
Therefore, they do not acquire sin. The tsunami is always due to anger of
God since you are killing the living beings present in water for food. The
earthquakes are due to killing of living beings that exist on the earth. God in
the form of Buddha and Mahavir preached the non-violence and severely
opposed the killing of living beings. God in some other human forms might
have followed the practice of non-vegetarian food in order to join with nonvegetarian people so that, certain other higher aspects to be preached might
have been taken into consideration. That does not mean that God has
encouraged the killing of living beings through non-vegetarian food. He
might have kept silent on this issue in order to give importance to other
serious issues. God follows the ignorance of the students in order to
become friendly with them. To control a running bull, you have to run
along with it for some distance before controlling it.
All these are the basic concepts of nivrutti, which are the core of
pravrutti. By following the ethics of pravrutti, you will avoid God
becoming furious with you. Then, through nivrutti, you can please God. On
22
one hand, you are making God furious by not following the ethics of
pravrutti and how can you please God through nivrutti simultaneously?
23
will of the human being. But, the generation of that will in the absence of
above inert materials is unimaginable. Since the process of generation is
unimaginable, naturally, the generator is also unimaginable. Since the
process of generation and the generator are unimaginable, such a will can
have total independence. Qualitatively, the will of God and the will of
human being may be similar. But, potentially, they differ from each other.
The difference is lot and the similarity is very little. The nature of work
may be same, but the potency differs.
[Example] Krishna lifted a mountain. You may lift a small stone. The
process of lifting is same. But, there is lot of potential difference. Hence,
you cannot compare the will of a human being, which is controlled by inert
materials, to the will of God, which is totally independent with unlimited
potency. Krishna is like an ordinary human being only. But, the potency is
unimaginable since, He showed the entire infinite cosmic energy in Him
through the vision of Vishwa Roopa. By external qualitative similarity,
you cannot say that Krishna is an ordinary human being or every ordinary
human being is Krishna. Similarly, due to external similarity of nature of
work, you cannot say the awareness of God and awareness of a human
being are one and the same. You are considering only one similar point
forgetting the rest ninety-nine different points. The imaginable awareness
can never be unimaginable God.
[Phani asked about the imaginable infinite cosmic energy used in the
message of Swami. Infinite means unimaginable. Then, how the infinite
becomes imaginable?]
Swami replied: If you say that the ocean is infinite, it only means
that the boundary of the ocean is unimaginable and not the ocean. The
ocean contains imaginable water. Therefore, this cosmic energy in which
the manifested world exists is infinite, but, imaginable. The cosmic energy
along with its manifested world is imaginable. The boundary of imaginable
cosmic energy means that the imaginable cosmic energy stops there and its
source, the unimaginable God, starts. When you say that some line is the
boundary of the ocean, it means that the water stops there and the soil starts
from there. Therefore, we say that the soil is beyond the ocean. Similarly,
the unimaginable God is beyond this cosmic energy. The boundary of
cosmic energy indicates the ending point of the imaginable cosmic energy
and the starting point of unimaginable God. Therefore, that point becomes
unimaginable. A joining point existing between two imaginable areas is
imaginable. But, the joining point existing between imaginable entity and
unimaginable entity is always unimaginable. The unimaginable nature of
the boundary is due to the unimaginable God. When the imaginable point
25
and the unimaginable point mix, the unimaginable nature prevails. When
the wood and fire mix, fire prevails. Therefore, the word imaginable
infinite cosmic energy means that the cosmic energy, which is the core, is
imaginable and its boundary, which is infinite, is unimaginable. The
adjective imaginable relates to the core cosmic energy. The adjective
infinite relates to its boundary. Hence, the word imaginable infinite
cosmic energy. This cosmos is infinite. The cosmos means the inert
cosmic energy along with its manifested matter. Both the cosmic energy
and manifested matter are imaginable. The boundary of the cosmos is
unimaginable and hence, becomes infinite because, the unimaginable God
starts from the boundary of cosmos and therefore, God is said to be beyond
cosmos.
26
human form is not really the Lord, there is no harm because it is only a
matter of supporting individual or social justice or sacred spiritual
knowledge. In all these cases, the recognition of the Lord in human form
need not be very serious. Even if the recognition is a failure, there is no
danger otherwise, since there is no trace of injustice in the service.
If you take the case of Dharmaraja and Gopikas, the Lord asked them
to follow injustice to please Him. Dharmaraja was asked by Krishna to tell
a lie. If that lie is uttered, his own teacher Drona will be killed, which is the
greatest sin and its punishment will be very severe if Krishna is not God.
Dharmaraja could not take risk because his faith in the Lord was not
complete. Even though He praised Krishna as God many a times, there was
some trace of doubt in the heart of his heart and therefore, he could not take
the risk of going to hell. Similarly, Krishna expressed His love to Gopikas
through mischief. Gopikas were sages in the previous births and most of
them had complete faith in Krishna as the God. Therefore, such Gopikas
having complete and real faith, danced with Krishna in the midnights
cheating their sleeping husbands. They also did not object Krishna stealing
the butter from their houses, which was the basic livelihood especially for
their children. Both these activities were serious sins and if Krishna was not
God, Gopikas will go to severe hell. Gopikas did not have even a trace of
doubt in Krishna, but Dharmaraja had a trace of doubt. Hence, Dharmaraja
did not do the sin but, Gopikas did the sin. Dharmaraja was just a scholar of
scriptures and recognized Krishna as God through theoretical knowledge.
Gopikas were sages and realized the God through practical penance.
Penance means realizing God through practical knowledge and to prove
the faith in practical situations, which are very serious, causing lot of
trouble and pain. Such practical standing in testing situations is penance.
The penance, which you understand, is only theoretical in which one sits
closing the eyes and chants the name of the Lord or gains knowledge
through continuous study of scriptures. Dharmaraja was an example of
theoretical penance, whereas, Gopikas, who were the sages, were examples
of practical penance. Krishna was pleased with Gopikas but at the same
time, if Krishna is not God, Gopikas will be severely punished in the hell.
Their faith in Krishna conquered such fear and hence, did even the sin to
please the Lord. But, in the case of Dharmaraja, his faith could not conquer
the fear and hence, went back from doing the sin. Gopikas did not go to
hell for doing this sin, but, Dharmaraja went to hell for not doing the sin.
Of course, this is true if the human being is really the Lord. Therefore, the
devotees should not do sin in the service unless they have complete and
real faith in the human form of Lord, since the risk is very high. Of
28
course, it is an acid test for a devotee and unless the devotee is of highest
order like Gopikas, the devotee will fail due to the fear for the punishment
of the sin. The devotee also should be careful in this acid test because there
are several false human incarnations, who exploit the devotees in this line.
These false human incarnations are many in this Kali Yuga. Such false
human incarnations rob the money of the devotees, acting as Krishna
stealing the butter! They also cheat the female devotees in the disguise of
Krishna. Hence, the devotee should be very careful and unless the faith is in
the climax, the devotee should not take such risk and go to hell.
you should not mistake such knowledge as the Lord Himself or as the
inherent characteristic of the Lord. The Veda stated the knowledge as the
Lord since the possessor of an item can be called by that item. The
possessor of apples is called as apples. The married lady wears yellow
thread in her neck. You can always recognize the married lady through such
inseparable yellow thread. But, the yellow thread is not the inherent
characteristic of the married lady like her colour, beauty, etc. You can treat
the yellow thread as almost the inherent characteristic, but, it is not really
the inherent characteristic. Since God is unimaginable, His inherent
characteristics must also be unimaginable. Therefore, the spiritual
knowledge, which is mentioned as the sign of recognition of God, is only
inseparable-imaginable characteristic but, not the unimaginable inherent
characteristic. The knowledge is received and understood by you and
hence, cannot be unimaginable. It can be inseparable because the Lord
always keeps it with Himself without transfer since no devotee is serious
about such transfer.
30
10
should not exist in its generator. It means that the generator of the space
does not have spatial dimensions. The space means spatial dimensions
only. Length, width and height are the spatial dimensions and the
multiple product of these three is the volume or space. Your intelligence
can never imagine anything, which does not have spatial dimensions.
However much your intelligence may be sharp and however much your
intelligence may take time, it cannot imagine anything, which does not have
volume. Therefore, the generator of this space or cosmos is always
unimaginable and exists beyond the cosmos. This is the reason for the
everlasting space since its generator, which is the bank or boundary of this
cosmos is never achieved by the intelligence. When intelligence itself fails,
there is no possibility of the mind or senses to catch that unimaginable
boundary of the cosmos, which is the unimaginable God Himself. Except
this explanation, no other explanation gives satisfaction to expose the
reason for the infinity of the cosmos.
God is not in the cosmos because God does not have spatial
dimensions and He cannot exist in the cosmos, which has spatial
dimensions. Even if you say that the unimaginable God exists in the
cosmos, it is of no use, because such God is never detected even by the
sharp intelligence. It is as good as saying that God is not in the cosmos.
Therefore, the Veda says that nothing in this cosmos is God, because
nothing contains God. If something contains God, you can say it as God. If
a wire contains current, you can say such wire as current itself. Since no
imaginable item contains unimaginable God, no imaginable item can be
called as God (Neti neti Veda). Even in the case of human incarnation
that contains God, God is still undetectable even by intelligence, even
though you call It as God. The Veda (Tvadevanupravishat) and the Gita
(Manusheem tanum) speak about the special entry of God in human
incarnation for the purpose of preaching the spiritual knowledge to human
beings with exceptional specific talent in clarifying the doubts. Such
special entry cannot be the logical entry of cause into effect during
modification like mud in the pot. Such special entry is based on the desire
of God and not on the logical principle of entry of worldly cause into
wordly effect.
32
11
demon was placed on the laps of the Lord, which can be considered neither
as ground nor as sky. The Lord sat in the door, which is neither inside nor
outside the house. Thus, God has shown all the opening points for all the
shut doors. Therefore, the talent of God is inherent to God only. Mere
power is not sufficient. The talent is not an already existing item like the
power, which can be transferred. Talent is a new special flash of
intelligence that is generated in the new situation. The question in the
form of doubt is always new that is created by the active brain of a devotee.
Such questions should be answered with a new flash of talent generated
that projects the existing knowledge in a new form of model. Such a new
model only can perfectly pacify a doubt of an intellectual devotee.
Therefore, handling of the power with a special talent as per the new
situation is possible for God only. In the field of knowledge, the need of
such special talent is required at every step. Therefore, God alone comes to
preach the spiritual knowledge. The elaborate explanations of such answers,
already given by God, can be done by the followers.
Buddhists provoked an elephant towards Shankara. Shankara ran
away from the elephant. Buddhists asked that why should He run away if
the elephant is myth or false. Shankara replied that He told that the entire
creation is false and hence, the process of His running away is also false.
Who can give such answer except God? In fact, Shankara can prove that the
elephant is false. He can stand there itself and the elephant can just pass
through Him without disturbing Him in anyway. He passed through the
locked doors of the house of Mandana Mishra. But, if He does like that, He
can prove that the creation is false for God since He is God by Himself.
But, this cannot be applied to every human being. For a human being, the
creation is true since the the human being itself is a part of false creation.
For false human beings, the rest of the false creation is true. Therefore, the
human being is false, its running is false and the elephant is false. His reply
means all this. He answered the question from the point of a human being
and not from the point of God. Therefore, such talented explanation for the
unexpected situation is possible for the unimaginable God only.
34
12
since you may like some song and some other may like some other song.
Both songs are Gayatri since both protect you due to the reason that they
are related to God. If the song is related to the human beings or the subjects
of the human beings or to nature, it cannot protect you since the song is
related to creation but not related to the creator. However, if the song
describing the creation hints the greatness of the creator directly or
indirectly, it can also be Gayatri. But, the description of nature or the
subjects of human beings need not hint the creator always to everybody. A
row of white swans was flying below the blue sky. Several people gazed
that scene with excitation resulting from the beauty of the scene. But,
nobody thought about the creator through that scene. Only Shri
Ramakrishna Paramahamsa was excited by that scene and became
unconscious thinking about the creator of the scene. Therefore, any song
related to even worldly affairs can become Gayatri Mantra, if you can apply
that song directly or indirectly to the God. You may sing a cinema song
linking it to God in your heart. In such case, that cinema song will bring the
grace of God to you and protect you. Others may think that you are
attracted to the world by that cinema song. Therefore, your inner intention
is going to decide everything. Even if you sing a song related to God to
fulfill some worldly desire, it is not Gayatri Mantra. People may
misunderstand that you are a devotee of God by hearing such divine song
from your mouth. Neither you are a devotee nor is that divine song Gayatri
Mantra. You may sing a cinema song of worldly meaning, but if you have
directed it to God from your heart, you are a devotee and your song is
Gayatri Mantra, even though people misunderstand you as a worldly
person. Therefore, the public is not standard. Your intention in your heart is
the standard reference for anything.
A mantra should be selected by the devotee himself or herself from
the existing mantras or the devotee can convert even a non-mantra (worldly
song) into mantra through the intention diverted to God. The guru is like a
seller of vegetables keeping all varieties of vegetables before him and the
devotee is like the customer, who visits the shop of vegetables and selects
the desired vegetables. A devotee can also create his own mantra if he is a
poet.
36
13
39
14
and yoga means the practical offering of the same sweet to God in human
form. Therefore, samnyasa and yoga are practically one and the same
involving single practical action only. Gita says that sacrifice of work or
fruit of work (samnyasa) is horrible if the receiver, God, is absent. You
cannot remain without any work. if the fruit is offered to yourself or your
family only leaving God you are not protected and therefore, the result
becomes horrible (Duhkhamaaptumayogatah...). Therefore, remaining
without any work or storing the fruit without any sacrifice is not samnyasa.
Working for God and sacrifice of fruit of work to God is yoga, which
naturally means samnyasa, which means working for the worldly people or
sacrificing the fruit of work to the worldly people including yourself. Does
this mean that you have to work for God only or that you have to sacrifice
all the fruit to God only? The answer is both No and Yes. The answer is
No because you have to maintain yourself and your family to serve God
especially when your family is also devoted to God. The bare needs to
maintain the life are not selfish and this is told in the Gita also
(Sharirayatraapichate). This is the normal condition of the spiritual
aspirant. The answer becomes Yes in the special situation when you are
tested by God. Saktuprastha offered even the food needed for the minimum
life also to God during the test. God must always stand in the first position
before anybody including yourself. That alone is the real and highest
devotion that really pleases God. This point should be proved in the
practical test only, which must involve the human form of God only, and
not the statue or photo that represents God.
42
15
43
44
16
MEANING OF ATMAN
Misunderstood Theory Rectified by Practical Demonstration
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[March 18, 2011] The word Atman not only means the self but also
the body covering the self as per the Amarakosha, the standard dictionary in
Sanskrit language. The word Atman is derived from the verb atati, which
means that, which extends or grows or pervades. The body occupies some
space and grows in course of time pervading some more space. The soul is
a specific form of ordinary inert energy. Actually, it is a specific form of
work involving transfer of information from the senses with help of
neurons and the receipt of the information by the brain in the form of
impression is a subsequent step, which is also involved in this specific
work. This step of receipt of the information by the brain is called
knowledge or the process of knowing (jnaanam). Hence, the soul is said to
be the form of knowledge. This specific work takes place in a specific
system called nervous system. The soul also pervades all over the body
through nerves since the soul is a form of inert energy. Since the inert
energy is always in the form of waves occupying some space, the soul can
be called as the Atman that pervades some space. Therefore, the word
Atman means both the body and the soul. Therefore, the word Atman
means totally a human being, which consists of two parts called body and
soul. Body stands for matter and the soul stands for energy. Both matter
and energy are like the two friendly classmates and none is a boss or a slave
to the other. Rama and Krishna are two friends. You can call Rama as
Krishnas friend or Krishna as Ramas friend. If you superimpose the I on
the soul, you will call the body as My body. If you superimpose the I on
body, you will call the soul as My soul. Neither body belongs to the soul
nor does the soul belong to the body because both belong to God, the
ultimate single owner.
The ultimate conclusion of the meaning of the word Atman is only an
individual human being, which is composite of body and soul. The meaning
of the word Atman is very very important in spiritual knowledge because
this word misled several people. The word Atma Jnaanam is very important
because by achieving this, one gets the salvation. People think that the word
45
Atmajnaanam means the knowledge of self and start analyzing the soul
leaving the body. Such analysis is based on the error that Atman is confined
to self only. Even if you realize that Atman stands for both self and body
and go on analyzing the self and body, you will not get the salvation. No
doubt the Atman stands for both self and body. But, the word Atmajnaanam
does not mean the analysis of self and body. It only means the analysis of
identification of a specific human being, which is the composite of both self
and body that is pervaded by the unimaginable God. Here, the word
knowledge means the identification of that specific human being pervaded
by the unimaginable God, which exists in this world of humanity like a
specific water drop in the ocean. The word knowledge stands for only the
identification knowledge of the specific human being immersed in this vast
humanity and it does not mean the analysis of any human being. If
somebody says do you have any knowledge of that fellow?, it only means
the knowledge of whereabouts of that fellow. It does not mean the
knowledge of anatomy of that fellow, which is as good as the anatomy of
any fellow. God incarnates in the human form for the sake of humanity
(Manushim tanu maashritamGita). To catch God existing in that specific
human form is the essence of all the spiritual effort (sadhana). Since the
absolute God is unimaginable, the only way to catch such God is catching
that specific human form in which the unimaginable God is existing. There
is no other alternative way than this. Running after the energetic form of
God is also meaningless since such form is irrelevant and such form is also
not the actual God. It is as good as the human form of God. Since God
pervades all over the specific human form, that specific human being can be
treated as God for all practical purposes. Since you receive the shock by
touching any spot of the electrified wire, you can treat the entire wire
internally as well as externally as the current itself. Similarly God pervades
all over the human form internally and externally, the entire human form is
treated as God. The word Atman indicates the pervasion of God all over the
human form to impress you that you need not hesitate to treat such human
form as God in total sense. You can treat not only the soul but also the body
of such human form as God. Gopikas treated Krishna in this way since they
were sages, who were the scholars of the word Atman.
Shankara preached Atma Jnanam to His disciples in the sense that
they should identify Him as the human form of the God. The word Atman
means an individual human being. But, the disciples took the word Atman
in the sense of themselves and thought that they were the human forms of
the God. Thus, they thought that Atmajnanam means the analysis of
themselves. When Shankara told I am God (Aham Brahmaasmi), the
46
disciples took the word I applying to each individual self and thought that
each one of them was God. When Shankara told you are God (tat tvam
asi), it means that every disciple is expected to become God shortly. Here,
the verb in the present tense does not mean the actual present time but
means immediate future as per Sanskrit grammar. But, the disciple took the
verb in the present tense only and thought that he is already God. Shankara
told this human being is God (Ayam Atmaa Brahma). Shankara means
that a specific human being like Himself or Krishna is God. But, the
disciple took this to mean that every human being is God. Shankara told
awareness is God (Prajnanam Brahma). It means that God always
incarnates as a living human being and never as an inert object. This means
that awareness is always associated with the incarnation of God. In such
case, you can call the bearer by the possessed item, as you call the bearer of
the apples by the word apples. But, the disciples took this as the possessed
item itself to be the bearer. In such case, the bearer of the apple is the apple
itself and therefore, God is awareness itself. Even if you take the word
prajnanam to mean only simple general awareness, your interpretation is
not fitting here. Infact, the word prajnanam does not mean general
awareness even in the normal usage. It means only the special divine
knowledge that is associated with God in human form only. Therefore, the
disciple misunderstood here also and took himself as God since he is
associated with normal awareness just like any other living being. Hence,
the disciples took that each one of themselves is God like Shankara.
One day Shankara swallowed the wine. The desciples also swallowed
the wine thinking themselves as God like Shankara. Next day, Shankara
swallowed the molten lead. But, the disciples went back to swallow that.
Then Shankara preached them that He alone is God (Shivaha kevaloham).
The word kevala denotes that Shankara alone is God and not everybody.
Then, the disciples realized the true knowledge and surrendered to Him by
falling on His feet (Bhava Shankara deshika me sharanam). Every advaita
philosopher should realize this truth from the practical incident performed
by Shankara. One should know that practical knowledge is more valid than
theoretical knowledge, which can be easily misunderstood. The
misunderstood theory is always rectified by practical demonstration.
47
17
only. When somebody is not found, you will ask people do you have the
knowledge of that fellow?
Scientists have already given the detailed knowledge of the anatomy
of the human body. They have also found out that the soul is nothing but
nervous energy flowing through nerves up to the brain through neurons that
carry the information of the objects from senses to brain. Therefore,
Philosophy need not take unnecessary trouble of giving this type of
analytical knowledge of anatomy of body and soul, which becomes a
repetition only. Such analysis is related to the items of creation and not to
the creator. Philosophy has special dignity of giving the knowledge of
Creator. Unfortunately, the creator is unimaginable since He is beyond
spatial dimensions. This point is elaborately spoken by the Scripture (Veda
and Gita). Philosophy does not attempt the explanation of such
unimaginable God because it is totally impossible. It can only give the
knowledge of identification or the address of unimaginable God existing
in the human being. The knowledge of unimaginable God means only the
identification but not the analysis of composition of God. The human being
in which God exists is as good as any other human being and science has
already given the anatomy of any human being. Therefore, the human being
in which God exists need not be analyzed again. The God also cannot be
analyzed due to His unimaginable nature. Therefore, what remains is only
the knowledge of identification of a human being possessed by the
unimaginable God.
If you can catch such human incarnation of God, you can clarify all
your doubts. You can serve Him and please Him to get the grace of God.
Hence, the word Atmajnanam means only the knowledge of identification
of the present alive human form of God. Such incarnation of God alone is
satguru. The word sat indicates the absolute reality, which is the
unimaginable God. The word Guru indicates the human being that is
possessed by God acting as a visible and audible medium for the sake of
human beings. Guru can explain only the already existing scripture, which
answers almost all the doubts of human beings. But, sometimes a new
doubt arises, which requires totally a new answer, which can be given only
by Satguru. Sometimes a new way of explanation and interpretation is
required to open your eyes completely regarding the truth. Satguru alone
can give such new explanation. Krishna, Buddha, Mahavir, Jesus,
Mohammad, Shankara, Ramanuja, Madhva etc., are the satgurus so far
arrived. The preachings given by these Satgurus are sufficient for general
humanity. But, today the intelligence has become sharper and sharper
through science and technology and a new Satguru is required, called as a
49
Great Genius by Nostradamus. You have to find out such new Satguru,
who can open your eyes completely provided you have the real interest.
50
18
that ancient logic deals with God. It is totally wrong. The ancient logic
never agrees to God because God is beyond analysis and logic means only
analysis. By that way, science also keeps silent about God. Ignorant
people, unaware of the subject of logic, falsely think that logic is related
to God and science is related only to the analysis of creation. The reason
for this is that the ancient logic is in Sanskrit language.
identifying the awareness as the basic inert energy only, you will not be
aware of anything and hence, the tension disappears from root. Unless you
are relieved from the worldly tensions, you cannot understand God with
stable mind and serve God with full faith and determination. Therefore,
before identifying the specific human being possessed by God, you should
have the analytical knowledge of yourself to become fit to serve the
contemporary human incarnation. This analytical knowledge of self
serves like sedative injection to get rid of all the worldly tensions. It forms
the basis of your divine service.
Therefore, Shankara stressed on the first channel of the meaning,
which is the analytical knowledge of self and to identify yourself as that
self separating yourself from the human body. Once you achieve the result
of the first channel, you deserve to go for the second channel of the
meaning, which is the knowledge of identification of contemporary human
incarnation. Shankara trained all His disciples through the first channel
through His commentaries and made them fit to serve Himself, the
contemporary human incarnation. During this process of training, the
disciples slipped in taking the word Brahman as God and feel that self is
God and hence, they are God. Shankara corrected them by swallowing the
molten lead and declared that He alone is the God (Shivah Kevaloham),
which is the second channel of the meaning. The disciples, who already
became fit for the divine service by the first channel entered the second
channel and served Shankara in the rest of the period and were finally
blessed by God.
53
19
Even in the presence of strong opposite forces, you can come out of
the influence of such forces, by detaching yourself from those bonds. You
think that you are the body and hence, you think that all the bonds related to
body are your bonds. The bond with wife or husband is related to the
external body only. The bonds with the parents or the children are related
to blood, which is the main part of the body only. If you analyze and
realize that you are not the body but the soul, which is the nervous energy,
all the worldly bonds, which are related to body only, disappear. The soul,
which is a specific work form of inert energy, is beyond the materialized
body and blood. The nervous energy, which is basically the all pervading
inert cosmic energy, is the soul in qualitative sense. The same soul, which
is a drop of cosmic energy, differs in quantitative sense only. The cosmic
energy is called as Brahman, since it is the greatest created item in
quantitative sense. Hence, the soul is Brahman in this line of logic.
Therefore, by identifying yourself as the soul, you become inert like
the inert energy without any worldly bonds. In such case, all your worldly
bonds disappear and you will be free to attach yourself to God without the
competition. You become mentally stable due to absence of tensions of
worldly bonds. Since the mind is related to body, you become healthy in
the external body also. Therefore, you can attach to God without any
disturbance and serve Him effectively to get His grace forever. Therefore,
Shankara propagated the concept of soul to be identified for attaching
yourself with it to come out of the influence of all the worldly bonds even
while you are immersed in the ocean of such worldly bonds. Gopikas are
the best examples for the philosophy of Shankara. Hanuman is out of this
ocean and does not require such philosophy. Hanuman and Shankara are
exceptional cases and both are incarnations of God. Gopikas are the
ordinary individual souls and represent the common lot of humanity. The
philosophy written by Shankara is not meant for Himself. It is only for the
general lot of ordinary humanity like us.
55
20
beings but, it does not mean that science can analyze the unimaginable
items.
The violation of the logic of both science and human beings comes
under the unimaginable action of God. The actions of God may be visible
or invisible, but are unimaginable. Krishna lifting up the mountain is visible
but is unimaginable. Krishna hided the Sun with the help of His weapon
(Sudarshana Chakra) and created a false sunset in the war. This action of
hiding the Sun is invisible and also unimaginable. This does not mean that
God is the source of unimaginable actions only. Both imaginable and
unimaginable actions are from one God only. Krishna ate the food given by
His mother. This is visible and imaginable action. Krishna stole the butter
and this is invisible and imaginable action. Therefore, God is the source of
all the actions. God performs the unimaginable action when there is a real
requirement. Through such occasions, not only the requirements are met,
but also the knowledge about His unimaginable nature is given to human
beings.
Coming to the context of the present question, God has created this
imaginable creation and remains unimaginable since He is beyond space.
The generator of the space cannot have spatial dimensions. Therefore, God
remains unimaginable always and cannot be included in the visible or
invisible items of the creation, which are always imaginable. The Veda says
that those who knew God rejected every item of the creation not to be God.
It means God is unimaginable since every item of the creation is
imaginable. But, the requirement is that the devotees of God want to see,
talk, touch and live with God in this world. To fulfill this requirement, God
enters a human being and gets identified with It like the invisible current
enters a metallic wire and gets identified with it. In this example, current is
invisible but imaginable. We can only bring some invisible item of
creation to compare with unimaginable God since there is no second
unimaginable item in the creation other than God. Therefore, you should
not think that the invisible item is unimaginable. Even in the ancient logic,
all the invisible items were detected as imaginable parts of the creation.
But, somehow, the ancient logic could not detect the invisible awareness as
imaginable item. Of course, some schools have recognized the awareness
also as the imaginable item. Even the Gita mentions the awareness
indicated by the word Chetana, which is included in the imaginable items
of the creation. Even the word Jeeva is mentioned as the precious part of
the creation (Prakruti) only.
57
58
21
60
22
a break in continuous happiness. The happiness and misery must alter like
sweet and hot dishes in the meals or like happy and unhappy scenes in the
cinema. You enjoy the sweet and hot items in meals and happy and
unhappy scenes in cinema but not in the real life. Therefore, you should
develop the tactfulness of enjoying the misery also. Even the human
incarnations enjoyed the misery in this way. Therefore, the will of God
responsible for the multiplicity of behavior of the human beings is
completely free from any counter argument.
Your sacrifice in the divine service, which is for the contemporary
human incarnation or real devotees without any aspiration for fruit in return
will fetch you the highest grace of God. But, you should not aspire for the
grace of God and you should be careful in differentiating the false human
incarnations and false devotees from the real ones.
63
23
The Veda says clearly that the soul is generated from food. This
means that the food is oxidized to produce inert energy and the inert energy
is converted into awareness. The Vedic statement is an indirect step of
generation. If you have dollars, you can convert them into rupees and with
rupees, you can purchase any item in India. You can say that you can
purchase any item with dollar and such statement is the indirect statement.
All this means that the soul is an imaginable item of creation but not the
unimaginable creator. In the Bhagavatam it is said that certain souls were
hidden by Brahma and God in the form of Krishna created the same
souls again. This itself proves that the soul is created [item] and not the
creator. If the soul were to be the creator, it cannot be created again by
duplication. However, the soul is permanent or eternal with respect to
human body as said in the Gita (Nahanyate hanyamaane). Such
eternality is only relative but not absolute. The soul enters energetic body
after death, while the human body perishes and such eternality of the soul is
not real, permanent and absolute.
65
24
calling them as God so that the existence of God, which means their own
existence, cannot be denied.
69
25
change the present situation. Anybody does some action based on the
strong concept present in his mind. The strong concept in corruption is that
nobody will punish him or her here if the sin is done in undetected way.
Regarding the punishment in hell also, there is no fear because people think
that hell is only imagination. When the kings became highly corrupt and
dictators, Parashurama, the previous human incarnation, punished them here
itself to show that the sin will be punished here itself. All this earth was
donated to sages by Parashurama and since then, the rulers started ruling the
public under the guidance of sages. The council of ministers consisted of
sages. But today, the council of ministers consists of people with
unimaginable corruption. The sages were very simple and did not enjoy any
luxury. But today, the ministers are representatives of luxury. Even if you
dont believe in hell, you have to undergo punishment in the next birth. This
message was given by Rama. He killed Vali hiding behind a tree and the
punishment of such action was met in the next birth. This means that the
punishment is inevitable, whoever so, he or she maybe, since even the Lord
obeyed the rule. You may say that the hell is only imagination since the
rocket has gone up to moon. But, the space is infinite and you have not seen
the limiting boundary of the space to say that hell does not exist anywhere
in the space. Moreover, the departed souls exist in invisible energetic
bodies and therefore, the upper worlds are invisible to your materialistic
eye or any instrument due to very low frequency of the energy of their
bodies that is never embraced by the existing energy spectrum of science.
Rama sacrificed the kingdom to protect the word of His father. But,
you find Aurangazeb killing his father for the sake of kingdom. But, you
should appreciate him, who led a very simple life as king. You should
always take good from others leaving the bad. Rama gave this message and
asked Lakshmana to go to Ravana and learn the public administration from
him. We always see bad in others and mock them. We never appreciate
anybody. We find some defect even in Rama and try to criticize Him also.
Today is an important day for the rulers and officials. If they stop
corruption and serve the poor people, they will be blessed by Lord Rama.
Even the common public should vote for good people rejecting the corrupt
favors and get the blessings from Lord Rama. Otherwise, there is no
meaning in this festival and the holiday is unnecessary. Mahatma Gandhi
always remembered the name of Rama expecting the future rulers and
officials to take the ideals of Rama. Pravrutti is the basic foundation of
Nivrutti. The present human incarnation, Shri Satya Sai Baba, called as Sai
Ram, is totally concentrating on Pravrutti, which is the human value of the
society, like Rama. Corruption is destruction of Pravrutti and the corrupt
71
people are cold blooded demons, who will be punished by God severely
here and there. You should not violate the rules of pravrutti. You should not
imitate Lord Krishna and violate the rules. He violated the rule to show that
He is the rule maker and He alone has the power to violate the rules. By
this, He also tested the faith of the devotees in Him. Rama always behaved
like a human being to preach the behavior of the human being and never
even said that He is God. Even though sages praised Him as God, He
refused it by saying that He is an ordinary human being as the son of
Dasharatha. This is a message to all the human beings not to think
themselves as God in spite of such praise from others. This will avoid the
false human incarnations. Rama never preached anything and simply
practiced the rules of God. Krishna declared Himself as God and therefore,
cannot behave like a human being. Even the preaching of Krishna about
Nivrutti is also based on practice or karma yoga only. Practice alone gives
the fruit and the best eternal fruit is the grace of God.
72
26
the volume. Ancient Indian logic also says that volume (parimana) is the
characteristic of space. The Veda says that God created energy as well as
space. This contradicts another Vedic statement, which says that God
created space, space created air, air created fire, fire created water and
water created earth etc. The contradiction is that why God is said to be the
creator of space and energy only? If you take the sense of the actual creator
to be God, the Veda should have said God as the creator of every item. In
the sequential steps of creation, the word Agni is used, which is visible
energy. But in the context of God creating the energy, the word Tejas is
used, which is the invisible energy. Since space is invisible energy, the
Veda said God as the creator of space, which is invisible energy. There is
no contradiction since the essence of this apparent contradiction is only to
say that space is a form of invisible energy. X-rays, Gamma rays etc., are
also other forms of invisible energy.
Science keeps silent about God since no analysis is possible in the
case of God, who is beyond the spatial dimensions. Our intelligence cannot
go beyond the spatial dimensions and therefore, can never imagine the
entity, which has no spatial dimensions i.e., volume or area or single
dimension. The difference between science and philosophy is that
philosophy accepts the existence of God, who has no spatial dimensions,
whereas science keeps silent about the existence of God due to absence of
spatial dimensions. However, both science and philosophy are similar in
the inability of imagining God, who does not have the spatial dimensions.
of hand. Such generation is false because in the real generation, the ring is
prepared from gold. You cannot say that whenever a ring is generated, it is
always done by the false magic only. The false magic cannot disprove the
real generation of the ring. In the real generation, you are only generating
the ring from already generated gold. You are not generating the gold from
energy by way of condensation. In a miracle, the gold is generated from
energy by way of condensation. If the miracle is done by a devotee, the
condensation of gold is from already existing cosmic energy. If the miracle
is performed by God in human form, the energy is created by the will of
God since the already existing cosmic energy was also created by the will
of God. Therefore, in a miracle performed by a devotee by the grace of
God, the law of conservation of energy is followed. This difference
between God and devotee need not be discussed here since both are one and
the same as far as the inability of the human being is concerned.
A human being can neither create energy nor create matter from
the existing energy. Moreover, the instantaneous implementation of the
specific design of the ring is also not possible with the human being. All
these impossibilities make the event unimaginable, which is called as a
miracle. In spite of the impossible unimaginable steps, the basic process of
generation of matter from energy and the generation of ring from the matter
by application of some work form of energy is one and the same and is not
violated even in the miracle. Generation of a product may be done in
several ways and since the product is one and the same, one way of
generation cannot disprove the other way. For example, the same sodium
chloride can be generated by different chemical reactions. You might have
generated it by one specific chemical reaction. It does not mean that the
other ways of reactions used in the generation of sodium chloride cannot
exist. You might have generated some ash by moving the hand with the
help of magic. It does not mean that ash cannot be produced by other real
ways. Your way of generation of ash is false since it is magic. But,
generation of ash by a miracle need not be false because already the
possibility of the alternative real way is existing. Miracle is only an
extension of the real way. The ash is generated by the oxidation of some
matter and this is the real way. In the miracle, the matter is generated from
energy. Therefore, the present real way of generation of ash is only a part of
the entire real process. The entire real process is called as miracle and a
part of the real process is called as the human way of generation of ash.
The miracle establishes the existence of unimaginable entity with the
help of imaginable items. Once the unimaginable entity is practically
established, the saying of the unimaginable entity becomes valid till you
75
76
27
non-inert living human being here. The body and soul are two different
phases of the same component, which are inert matter and inert energy
respectively. By understanding that God is disconnected to matter and
energy, we should understand that the energy is disconnected to matter.
Hence, the soul is not touched by the problems of the body. The Gita
differentiates the soul and body in the beginning so that you will slowly
differentiate God from body and soul. Even in the human incarnation, the
soul is disconnected from the problems of the body as in the case of a
realized human being. Since we identify the soul as body and God as the
human being, which is understood as both soul and body, we
misunderstand the concept. We think that the soul suffers when the body
suffers. We think that God suffers when the body suffers and we assume
that the soul is also suffering since our souls suffer identifying themselves
with our bodies. Neither the soul nor God suffers while the body suffers in
the case of human incarnation. Due to lack of this realization, we mistake
Baba as His body and soul and therefore, we think that He is suffering. If
the shirt is cut by a blade, the underline banian is not cut and not to speak of
the innermost human being. If we understand this, we will realize that
Jesus did not suffer on the cross and Krishna did not suffer while the
bleeding continued on His foot.
We have superimposed the body and the soul with God and talk that
Baba is unable to do anything for Himself. The soldiers also mocked at
Jesus that He was unable to do anything for Himself on the cross. Even the
devotees feel much and their feeling is also based on the ignorance of the
realization. But, in the case of devotees, at least their feeling has a positive
side, which is their love to Baba. This positive side will be appreciated by
God. But, the atheists are not only ignorant but also lack the positive side.
Therefore, the message of Baba is that we should identify ourselves with
the soul and not with the body. We must maintain this realization even at
the time of the death (sthitvasyaamantakaalepi Gita). The Gita says that
the death is a happy occasion, in which the soul leaves the damaged dress
and takes up a new dress. The damaged dress is the old body and the new
dress is the energetic body, which is entered by the soul. Ignorance is the
source of reverse behavior. The atheists always have half knowledge of
science but pose as if they have realized the essence of science. The essence
of any branch of knowledge is the philosophy. Hence, we find the word
philosophy in the highest degree awarded even in science i.e., a doctor of
philosophy. Philosophy is only the deep-most analysis of the subject and
therefore, there is no opposition between science and philosophy.
78
You must always differentiate the context of God (Nivrutti) from the
context of human beings (Pravrutti). Krishna punished Kauravas for trying
to uncloth Draupadi. But, the same Krishna did not return the saris of
Gopikas. This appears as a contradiction. The first scene is between two
human beings. One human being is trying to see the naked body of the wife
of the other human being. In the second scene, God is trying to see the
naked body of the human being. In the second scene, the message of God
is that He is already aware of every atom of the creation and is testing
Gopikas whether they realize this in practice. Theory is different from
practice. Only a few Gopikas, who had the realization, lifted their folded
hands.
The atheist has no patience to analyze the concept. He concludes with
half analysis only and tries to project his version as the conclusion. He
always quotes false human incarnations and false devotees only. In that
way, he is doing the divine service since you should be aware of such false
projections also. He should not reject the genuine concepts by showing the
false concepts. Somewhere, copying in the examination may take place and
sometimes even mass copying may go on. By showing this, you should not
reject the sincere attempt of a genuine student in the examination also and
reject the very examination system itself. The student, who passed the
examination through copying, will certainly fail in the interview for a job,
which is a sharper examination. Similarly, you should reject the false
devotees and false incarnations by sharp analysis and catch the genuine
devotees and genuine incarnation to get the benefit. The atheist alarms you
about the side of exploitation, which is more in these days of Kali Yuga.
Therefore, the atheist is also maintained in this world by God. But, the
atheist is unaware of his divine service and is really scolding God and
therefore, is not benefitted after death like Ravana or Shishupala. God uses
the negative approach of atheists in the spiritual path, which is like the
concept of wealth from waste. We should take the positive side of their
negative behavior and should not scold them in return. All this clear
analysis is given only since the question came from the atheist. Therefore,
we should be grateful to him taking the positive side. One will always be
benefitted and feel happy throughout the life if he or she takes only the
positive side of everything.
79
28
and basic inert form, several complications arise. If God is work form, there
should be a materialized system before the production of God. The nervous
system exists before the production of awareness. In such case, God cannot
be the creator due to pre-existence of matter and inert energy, which are
essential for the production of awareness. Based on this point, people try to
detect God in living beings and therefore, conclude that this awareness is
God. They quote the Veda to support their point. The Veda says that God
created this world and entered it (Tadevaanupraavishat). But, the Veda
also said that God is the special knowledge (Prajnanam), which can be
found only in specific human beings like Krishna, etc. You reduce the
meaning of special knowledge to mere basic awareness and say that God
is in every living being. By this also, you should not conclude that God is
the special knowledge in real sense because even in this context, God is
only associated with the special knowledge and becomes bearer of the
special knowledge to be called as the special knowledge. Leaving this one
occasion of human incarnation, which can be explained only with the help
of unimaginable power of God, the general logic clearly demonstrates that
God can never exist in this world. The reason for this is that the world has
spatial dimensions and God has no spatial dimensions. For this concept,
you can take Atman in the sense of human body as a simile to God
because the human body never enters the imaginary world. Thus, the
second meaning (human body) of the word Atman becomes fruitful in this
context.
body only. Identification of God with matter does not mean that the
statues or photos are also identified with the entry of God. God never
enters the inert statues because the main purpose of preaching the
knowledge cannot be served. If it [preaching of knowledge] is done
through statues, people will be shocked with wonder and they will not
understand the knowledge. They can understand only from a human being
since it is the natural mode. Therefore, God identifies with the inert matter
only when it is associated with awareness. Hence, the human incarnation is
the only possibility.
However, the statues or photos can stand as representative models of
God to develop the devotion. You will understand the concept of spiritual
knowledge in the right sense provided you analyze it from all directions. If
you are unable to analyze, you must read the analysis also from all
directions. The analysis gets magnified as the quality as well as the
number of counter arguments increase. I am ready here to answer any
counter argument provided you have the un-biased capacity of receiving the
truth. You need not fear that the counter argument means that you are
opposing Me. More the counter arguments, more will be the answers. More
the answers, more will be the clarification of the subject. Arjuna posed
several counter arguments and the various answers of the Lord brought the
clarification of the subject in the Gita. In fact, Arjuna helped Krishna to
clarify more and more. Therefore, attacking Me with more arguments is
also a part of the divine service to bring more clarification. Mandana
Mishra was the incarnation of Lord Brahma, who argued with Shankara for
several days. Shankara was the incarnation of Lord Shiva. All his counter
arguments helped Shankara to construct the subject. Mandana Mishra
knows the truth, but argued opposing Shankara only to construct the subject
for the sake of the world. Both Brahman and Shiva are one and the same.
Even Krishna said that He is Arjuna. Arjuna also questioned Krishna in
several ways to get more clarification for the sake of the world.
82
29
the miracles extensively as the emergent need of the hour. As a result of the
exhibited miracles, the human incarnation is easily identified as God based
on the general standard of the public. Generally, public detects God
through miracles only. The miracles establish the existence of God but do
not mean that the performer of miracles is always God since even devils
perform miracles. However, even the miracles performed by devils also
establish the existence of God. Based on this positive side of the miracles,
God gives miraculous powers even to devils. However, based on the
general standard of the public, the performer of the miracles is identified as
God. If the performer is a demon, he will say that he alone is God, which is
not truth. But, in the case of human incarnation whether He says or not, it is
truth. Whether it is truth or not, people will not like this declaration that a
human being is God. People get interested in anything, only if they can
achieve it. People never like that somebody alone is God and that they
should serve Him like bonded slaves forever. They do not mind to become
bonded slaves if they have a ray of hope that some way or other, they will
become God. In fact, everybody has the golden opportunity to become God
but strict condition is that they should not have even an iota of hope that
they will become God on some day or other. Hanuman never had even an
iota of such hope to become God. Even though He is informed that He will
become God, He always aspired to be a slave to God only. Therefore, He
became God. Due to this complication only, nobody is becoming God. But,
there are a few exceptional cases, who become God.
Generally, when people identify somebody as God, they serve Him
like slaves to solve their problems and to get some fruits. After sometime,
when most of their problems are solved, the jealousy, which was already
hidden in them due to needs, starts budding up. Even an iota of jealousy or
selfishness based on ego will spoil the spiritual effort. Therefore, till the
maturity is reached, it is better to retain hope of becoming God. Such trick
is Advaita philosophy, which says that you are already God and that you
will really become God provided you attain the perfect knowledge. This
will encourage the people to acquire the spiritual knowledge, which is the
first step. Without knowledge, practice is impossible. This step will attract
even the most egoistic atheists. This trick was developed by Shankara for
the first time. Baba followed the same trick like most of the human
incarnations. The trick was disclosed by Shankara on one occasion when
He swallowed the molten lead and declared that He alone was the Lord.
Similarly, Baba disclosed this trick in one of His speeches like this: Dont
think that you are God and behave as you like. Such disclosure is
necessary when the negative side becomes extensive.
87
30
forms was the cause for the religious split. God only takes a form and this
does not mean God is the form. If you take a pencil in your hand, you are
not the pencil. You have the pencil. Similarly, when God takes the form,
God is not the form and you should say that God has the form. God is
unimaginable and cannot be any imaginable item. Every imaginable item
has form. When God takes form, you should not say that God has become
the form. Therefore, when the unimaginable God takes and imaginable
item as His medium, you should not say that God is transformed into
imaginable item. If God is really transformed into imaginable item, there
will be multiplicity of God leading to fights. By taking pencil, if you have
become really the pencil, and after sometime, you take a pen by which you
have become the pen. The war starts between the two persons since
somebody says that you are the pencil and the other person says that you
are the pen. Krishna clearly stated this in the Gita. The Gita says that
ignorant people misunderstand God that the unimaginable God is really
transformed into imaginable form since they do not know that God is
actually unimaginable (Avyaktam Vyaktimaapannam). In the case of God,
the word formless indicates that He is unimaginable. Actually, the
imaginable items of creation are form-full and formless. Sky is formless
and Earth is formfull. In the first step, you have to climb from formfull to
formless and in the second step, you have to climb from formless to
unimaginable. For the people who think that God is formfull, if you say
that God is unimaginable, it will be a double jump, which will be very
difficult. Both formless and unimaginable are unseen. When people think
God is seen like light, etc. you can say that God is the unseen, formless
cosmic energy that pervades all over the cosmos. By this, you have
established God at least as unseen. In the second step, you can say that God
is not even the cosmic energy since it is imaginable and say that God is
unimaginable. In fact, cosmic energy also has form, which is in the form of
waves or quanta and can be seen through powerful microscope. Since the
microscope was not discovered in that time, God was said to be cosmic
energy, which was unseen and formless. Cosmic energy also has form of
waves or quanta. It is a simile that was used when the microscope was
absent. Hence, God was said to be all pervading formless entity. But today,
science has developed so much that you cannot define God as unseen and
formless pervading all over the cosmos. All these similes have to be
dropped because every simile is detected by science and God is left over,
who is beyond detection. Therefore, the time has come to say that God is
un-detectable. Krishna clearly stated that nobody knows God, which means
God is unimaginable (Maamtuveda na kashchana). The words used by
90
the human incarnations have their significance in the context of those times.
Therefore, if Mohammed said that God was formless and all pervading.
You should understand that His intention was only to divert from the
concept that God is some visible form and limited. Baba also tried His level
best to unify all the religions of the world and was never confined to any
specific religion. Baba treated all the religions of the world with equality
and He has the devotees in all the religions.
Coming to Mahavir, who is also another human incarnation, He
stressed on the need of non-violence to the extent of not harming even an
ant. The goal set up by Him was extreme. If the goal set up is very high,
people can practice to some extent. If you say that the pass mark is 100,
students will get at least 40. If you set up the goal at 40, students will get 5
or 10 only. Based on this psychology, Mahavir has set up the goal of nonviolence at the extreme end. Baba always preached non-violence and
opposed beating the bulls of the carts even in His childhood. Baba opposed
even the killing of the tiger. Baba asked the hunter to think about the
motherless children of the tiger. Mahavir opposed even the killing of
harmful insects. In this aspect, you will find a tremendous similarity
between Mahavir and Baba.
91
31
were not covered by Baba in His discourses. The reason is that Baba
wanted to give fame to Me, His servant, and hence, reserved those
concepts. If I do not reveal this truth, it means that I am subjected to ego.
Again, this is another test of Datta. The test of Datta is very very subtle and
you will be easily caught by the clutches of ego and jealousy. Even angels
failed in the tests of Datta. Even Hanuman was tested by Rama on several
occasions and the test was so subtle that so far nobody could detect them
unless God revealed them through Me.
I feel always that I am the most undeserving devotee of God. But the
fun is that some most deserving devotees became My disciples! Most of
them call Me as the human incarnation of God due to this excellent spiritual
knowledge. It is true that God is identified by the excellent spiritual
knowledge only (Prajnanam Brahma) since the miracles are also
demonstrated by devils. I have to accept this new status of human
incarnation based on the Vedic authority. But, at the same time, the soul
component in Me should be very careful to resist ego. The praise of
devotees is only the trial of Datta to subject Me to ego. When the soul
component in Parashurama became egoistic, He was punished. But,
Hanuman, another human incarnation, was never subjected to ego in any
test. Rama and Hanuman were master and servant. But, both were human
incarnations. With respect to the soul components, Rama is the master and
Hanuman is the servant. But, with respect to the component of
unimaginable God present in both, both are one and same. There is a verse
which states that Hanuman told Rama like this, I am your servant from
the point of materialistic medium. I am your part from the point of
energetic medium. Myself and Yourself are one and the same from the
point of the unimaginable God existing in both of us. Matter and energy
constitute the medium, which is the creation. The unimaginable God is the
creator.
Devils perform miracles but cannot preach the spiritual knowledge.
The miracles performed by them will be used by them for their selfish ends
only. The human incarnation also performs miracles according to need only
for the sake of welfare of devotees or for the sake of establishment of the
concepts of spiritual knowledge. Apart from the miracles, the incarnations
preach mainly the spiritual knowledge. The miracles performed by Baba
were always for the sake of the devotees and sometimes, during His
speeches, the miracles were performed to establish the concepts. Baba
always told that everybody is God and this statement always neutralized the
egoism and jealousy in the hearts of devotees. On one occasion, a devotee
asked Baba, How can You say that You are the God? Baba replied, You
93
did not hear Me properly. I say that both of us are God. The difference is
that I know this and you do not know this. The devotee kept silent. In the
case of some devotees, the egoism and jealousy are suppressed because
they are in need of the help of Baba for their materialistic welfare. In the
case of some few devotees, the egoism and jealousy are unconsciously
hidden, which will come out on proper occasion. There is no human being
without egoism and jealousy just like there is no building without building
materials.
should be separated from body. But, in the case of human incarnation, the
soul should be separated not only from the body but also from the God.
path and may donate the preacher heavily in excitation. Such preachers are
many in the present time.
change the attitudes and the best title for Baba would be THE KING OF
KINGS.
98
32
never become egoistic and should treat their disciples with respect always.
The devotees are human beings and their devotees are also human beings.
One human being should respect the other human being. The case of Baba
is different. Baba is God and the devotees are human beings. Baba need not
respect His devotees. But, later on, some of His disciples may have again
disciples and they may imitate Baba thinking themselves also as human
incarnations. All these points stand as the basis for such acts of Jesus and
Baba. Baba is giving the message that you should express gratefulness to
anybody irrespective of the status. Baba is also giving the message that you
should remain as devotee only with folded hands before God. You should
never claim that you are the human incarnation with a blessing hand
always, falling in the trap of the praise of your disciples.
3) Another issue is that Baba told that He will rise after three days from
death of His body.
Even in the case of Jesus, such a statement was made and this shows
the similarity between Baba and Jesus. Shirdi Sai Baba also rose after three
days after death. This miracle is not necessary in the case of Baba, who
arose a dead person, which shows that Baba is the controller of the life.
When Baba can rise other dead persons, cant He rise Himself? Both the
miracles establish the same concept. The point is that whether Baba can do
it or not. If it is established by one type of miracle that Baba can do it,
another type of miracle establishing the same concept need not be done
again. For a wise person, one miracle, which is an unimaginable event, is
sufficient to understand that the unimaginable God exists in that body.
Rama has not done any miracle except one i.e., converting the stone into a
woman by the touch of His foot. Is this one miracle not sufficient to
establish that Rama is God? All the sages understood Rama as God because
they are learned scholars. Rama performed this miracle in presence of the
sage Vishwamitra and Vishwamitra propagated this miracle to other sages.
Krishna performed many miracles. But there were many enemies for
Krishna. Kauravas saw the top-most miracle, which was the cosmic vision,
but still did not believe Krishna as God thinking that it is illusion of eye.
For a human being, with the faculty of intelligence working,
demonstration of one unimaginable event is sufficient. For human
beings, burning with ego and jealousy, even if thousand miracles are
demonstrated, all will be treated as magic or illusion of the eye.
4) Some people say that Baba was harmed by some of His followers.
Is this possible? Can a human being harm God? Assuming that
somebody harmed Baba, it must be the will of Baba only. Jesus was
crucified by some people and it was done by the will of God only. If there
100
is any sin in the followers, God will take care of it by giving punishment
in the appropriate time. Why should you worry about it? You follow all the
messages of Baba and try to practice so that God will be pleased with you
and you will be protected by the grace of Baba. You are wasting your
valuable time and energy in unnecessary things neglecting the essential
aspects related to your future welfare. Jesus, while carrying on the cross
told the weeping people that they should weep about themselves and their
children. The reason is that after the momentary pain of crucifixion, Jesus
will sit on the lap of God whereas the people will go to the permanent hell
after this short happy life. You try to stand on the principles preached by
Baba and you neither worry about Baba nor about others. Whether others
follow or not, you follow the principles preached by Baba. Everybody
thinks that he or she need not follow these principles since others are not
following. The entire society thinks like that only. The king asked for the
donation of one tumbler of milk from each house. Everybody thought that
one can pour one tumbler of water, which will be mixed in the milk poured
by others. Finally, the whole drum was full of water only! Everybody
should follow the principles preached by Baba not caring for others
[following]. If you are interested in their welfare, you preach them also
after personal follow-up. If there is no change, even the entire mass will be
punished, which is going to be the future action of Kalki. Dont think that
since it is an issue of the mass, there will be excuse.
101
33
become God in this birth itself, but if you achieve perfection in Pravrutti,
you have every possibility to become God in some birth.
When Shankara came, all were atheists and especially the
purvamimaamsakaas were after heavenly pleasures. Today also, the
situation is almost the same. The purvamimaamsakaas openly declared that
there is no God. But, they believed in hell and heaven. They were attracted
to the heavenly pleasures and killed the animals in sacrifice, which was
thought to be the path for heaven. Today, people believe in the existence of
God and the devotion to God is only to please Him by which their problems
can be solved. They doubt in hell and heaven in the depth of their hearts but
believe in the worldly pleasures. They do not mind to do anything to earn
money for the sake of worldly pleasures and family bonds. Killing of
animals in sacrifice was stopped by Buddha. Atheism was condemned and
theism was established by Shankara. Today, there are two problems.
1) The first is the negative side of the development of science. [This]
established the atheism and people do not believe in the unimaginable
God unless the unimaginable events demonstrated before their eyes
establish Him.
2) The second problem is the extensive selfishness due to which, several
sins are committed.
These two problems were before Baba. He demonstrated the
unimaginable events, called as miracles, to neutralize the negative
development of science. The second problem is solved by using the
philosophy of Shankara, which is already developed for a similar situation.
Both the ego developed by science and jealousy towards a specific human
being to be called as God are neutralized since everybody is God. The
concept of the unreal world and the concept of liberal divine qualities of
God can bring down the selfishness to a great extent.
104
34
further atrocities. Shri Rama was very peaceful because His goal is to be an
example for human beings. Both these are simultaneous programs. Even a
human being does two types of activities at a time. In such case, why not
the omnipotent God? Shirdi Sai Baba was very rough and tough since He
preached the villagers. Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa was very soft since
He preached the educated public of city. Both are simultaneous human
incarnations. It is impossible for a human being having spatial dimensions
to exist in different houses, which have large spatial dimensions. But, God
has no spatial dimensions and hence, can exist in different human forms,
which have spatial dimensions. Here, to some extent, you can take the
simile of current existing in different wires performing different activities.
Simultaneously, the current generates sound in T.V., light in a bulb and
mechanical motion in a fan. You can take this simile to a great extent
because many good aspects of comparison are covered. But, there are
limitations even to this simile. Current is a chain of electrons, which may be
treated as particles or waves. But, God is not a chain of particles or waves.
Both particles and waves have spatial dimensions and hence, current also
has spatial dimensions. Therefore, current is quantitatively divided in
different instruments but God has no spatial dimensions and such
quantitative division is not possible in the case of God.
sound babababa etc. Hence, the lamb stands for Baba. Again, this does not
mean that the human incarnation with the name Baba alone is God. The
scripture gave several metaphors and this is not the only metaphor.
Moreover, Baba means father. God is the Father, who is the creator of all
the souls. The Gita says this (Aham Beejapradah Pita). In this way, you
can apply this simile alone to every human incarnation.
Every human incarnation is one and the same since it is the
imaginable human form in which the unimaginable God exists. The basic
qualities are also one and the same except there is a difference in the
some of the qualities. The difference in some of the qualities is due to the
difference in the programs and due to the difference in the standards and
qualities of human beings, with whom God has to deal. To deal with a cruel
demon like Hiranyakashapu, God is associated with anger. To deal with the
cruel human beings, who kill the animals, God is associated with peace in
preaching. The basic aim of every human incarnation is one and the
same, which is the establishment of peace and harmony in the society and
to guide the few deserving devotees in the Nivrutti. Another basic aim is to
pacify the desire of the devotees to see and directly talk with God for the
clarification of their doubts.
108
35
Baba as Shankara
The case of Baba was similar to that of Shankara. The situations and
the requirements of the programs were also similar. In the time of
Shankara, there were many atheists. In the time of Baba also, the
development of science taken in the negative sense is too much and
practically atheism only existed even though theism existed theoretically. If
the people believe in the unimaginable God, they will have fear for the hell
and the sins shall be minimized. Today, sins in all angles are in climax.
The immediate answer for the practical proof of the existence of God is the
establishment of an unimaginable event called as miracle. Shankara and
Baba performed miracles even from the childhood. Shankara as a child
created the pour down of some golden fruits in the house of a poor person.
A few other recorded miracles performed by Shankara were:
1) Going to the house of Mandana Mishra by the path of sky,
2) Passing through the bolted doors of the house of Mandana Mishra,
3) Entering the dead body of a king for some days,
4) Giving speech to a dumb fellow, etc.
The ego and jealousy of an atheist are always in the climax and the
atheist will never accept the contemporary human incarnation. To pacify
this attitude, Shankara created a twist in the concept of human incarnation
that every living being having awareness is God. By this, Shankara tried to
achieve the goal of Buddha also to restrict the people from killing the
animals, birds, etc. since every living being is God. The present situation is
also not different from that of Shankara. In the time of Shankara, atheism
existed in the name of atheism only. But today, the same atheism exists in
111
the name of theism. It is the same old wine in a new bottle. Baba also
performed several miracles to give proof of unimaginable God. Baba also
adopted the same philosophical trick of Shankara to pacify the ego and
jealousy of the human beings. Even in His speeches, Baba admired
Shankara many a times.
that the spiritual knowledge is the only identifying sign of God in human
form.
114
36
Baba came down to change the present behavior of the human beings
(Pravrutti). You should change yourself without worrying about others. If
every individual thinks like this and changes, the entire society is
transformed and Baba will be happy. Hereafter, you will not have any
direct message from Baba. But, Baba said more than enough. Be truthful.
Follow the justice. Maintain the peace of the world. Love every living
being. These four points constitute the essence of the preaching of Baba.
Once Baba told, You need not come to this place to see Me. Remain in
your house and try to practically implement at least one point of My
message. Then only I will be happy with you. Let us follow His message.
The corruption and violence are the two present dangerous diseases of
the society, which are more dangerous than cancer and AIDS. By cancer
and AIDS, the individual is destroyed. But, by corruption and violence, the
society will be destroyed. The system of deeds and fruits takes care of an
individual. But, if the society is destroyed, God enters and tries to save it. If
the society does not change, it will be totally destroyed by vexed God
Himself in the form of Kalki. But, a few individual souls, who are
transformed, will be protected by God in that time of total destruction of the
society. You try to become one of such few blessed individuals. Your trial
will please Baba, who will help you to succeed in the effort. If the effort is
absent, God will not interfere because He will be charged with partiality.
Baba Baba, the God covered in red sheath,
The soul of souls, lies in You only underneath
Your real tribute to Him will be, henceforth,
To avoid corruption and violence to go to north.
(The Gita says that the soul after death has two paths. One path will
be to south, which is to the hell to be punished for the sins and the other
path will be to north to live with happiness in association with angels).
116
37
the society, who are in that line. All these hungry poor people revolt with
terrorism and there by the peace and love disappear. Therefore, deviation
from truth and justice due to corruption result in violence. In the ancient
times, there was no terrorism at all since every human being was based on
truth and justice only. Therefore, Baba emphasized the importance of truth
and justice from His childhood in order to establish peace and love in the
society. If the society is disturbed, there is no place for Nivrutti also. If the
stage is broken, where is the drama?
We must not worry for the exit of the soul and body of Baba. The
body is visible and imaginable component. The soul is invisible but
imaginable component. Both these components constitute the creation and
can be treated as one component only. Soul is energy and body is the
matter. Matter and energy are two phases of the same component called
creation. The creator is the absolute God, who is invisible and
unimaginable. The human incarnation is thus, a three component system of
God, soul and body. It can be treated as a two component system also if the
soul and body are treated as the two phases of the same component. The
body decomposes into the original five elements. The soul is eternal with
reference to the body. God is the absolute eternal entity. Neither God nor
the soul and nor the body is lost. Only the shape of the body is lost in this
world, which is also preserved in the energetic form in the upper world.
Therefore, nothing is lost. Baba can appear in the same form through
energetic body to the ardent devotees. We must follow the four principles
preached by Baba. At least, if we follow truth and justice, peace and love
are the natural consequences.
The basis of violence is corruption. The basis of corruption is
selfishness. Unless the selfishness is filtered from your devotion to God,
the love in God towards you will not start. You think yourself as the top
most devotee due to the quantity of your devotion. Even the mountain of
devotion is waste in the eyes of God if selfishness is present. God always
sees the quality of devotion.
118
38
ANALYSIS OF AWARENESS
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[June 09, 2011] The light energy is quantized and its fundamental bits
are called as photons. A photon exists with certain frequency but the
frequency is variable. The light energy is a part of cosmic energy and
therefore, you should not say that the entire cosmic energy is light energy.
Similarly, awareness is quantized into bits, called as the individual souls.
Even though the light energy occupies a part of the cosmic space, it is
continuous within its limited boundaries. But, the awareness is not like that.
It is not continuous within the specified boundaries. It is discontinuous. It is
just like some jewels displayed in a shop. The gold is quantized into jewels.
But, the jewels in the shop are separate and have no continuity within the
boundaries of the shop. At least, the original gold before modification into
jewels is continuous as a lump within the specific boundaries. This means
that awareness was not even a lump when it was created. The awareness
was not created as a lump like gold and later on it was not quantized like
the gold into jewels. The awareness is limited to a living being. The living
beings have no continuity and are discrete with specified boundaries. The
awareness is generated as a specific work form of inert energy in a
specified nervous system existing in each living being. Since the
awareness or nervous energy exists in the discrete living beings, we can
say that the awareness is quantized into bits called as living beings.
The awareness does not mean simply the homogenous nervous
energy. The bit of awareness existing in a living being is again quantized
into different sub-bits called as thoughts. Each thought is a specific mode of
nervous energy. The thoughts are different like the golden jewels with
different designs. Therefore, a bit of awareness means a bundle of
quantized thoughts only. Of course, the awareness can also exist as a lump
without thoughts during the period of rest without sleep. In the rest period
of deep sleep, the awareness exists as its basic form of inert energy. The
rest of mind without sleep is called as meditation. The dream is again a
bundle of thoughts without interaction with the external world. The bundle
of thoughts interacting with the external world is the awaken state. The
thoughts may vary from time to time due to the changed interactions with
the external world. Such a change is compared to the change in the
119
frequency of the photon. The dreams also vary since the thoughts of the
dreams are only the stored external thoughts in the mind, which vary every
day. Of course, the strong thoughts carried on from the previous births do
not change. A dream sometimes involves the thoughts of the previous
births and sometimes involves the day to day stored thoughts from the
external world.
All this analysis of awareness becomes important since awareness is
misunderstood as God. The reason for such misunderstanding is that since
God is aware of everything, God must be awareness. In such case, God
must have the nervous system in Himself with help of which only the
awareness is generated as in the case of a living being. For the generation of
the awareness, the matter in the form of nervous system and the inert
energy are essential pre-requisites. We say that God created matter and
energy. It becomes a contradiction because matter and energy exist in God
even before the creation. Therefore, the awareness of God must be
unimaginable. There cannot be unimaginable God and unimaginable
awareness since two unimaginable entities need not exist. Again, the word
unimaginable awareness is wrong. Awareness is an understood imaginable
entity. If you say that the awareness is unimaginable, there will be self
contradiction because the awareness is always imaginable. Therefore, you
should remove the word awareness and say that only unimaginable entity
exists. This unimaginable entity itself is termed as God. The unimaginable
entity can have the awareness without nervous system and inert energy
through unimaginable way. By this, the unimaginable God can be
associated with awareness and be aware of everything. This is a simple step
and will have no complications. Otherwise, if you take the understood
imaginable awareness as God, all the above complications arise. There
are only two items. The first item is the creator, who is unimaginable. The
second item is the creation, which is imaginable by the grace of God. The
awareness is an item of creation and hence, cannot be the unimaginable
God.
If you take the awareness as God, there will be a chain of slips and
the final result of all these slips will be that you are God. Since the
unimaginable God becomes imaginable for the sake of devotees by
identifying Himself with a human form like Rama or Krishna, the wrong
side effect of this human incarnation is that every human being thinks itself
as God due to ego and jealousy. The identification of unimaginable God
with the human form is perfect and hence, such a specific human form
can be taken as God for all practical purposes. By this angle, the devotees
are satisfied and are benefited. To neutralize the jealousy of some
120
121
39
MEANING OF DATTATREYA
God Incarnates in Different Forms in Each World
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[June 09, 2011 Evening] The word Dattatreya is combination of two
words i.e., Datta and Aatreya. Datta means the unimaginable God given to
devotees through the human incarnation, which is the human form with
which God is identified. By this process, the unimaginable God becomes
imaginable and visible human being with whom all the spiritual aspirants
can clarify their doubts. The word Aatreya comes from Atri meaning that
God is not three entities. The three entities are Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva.
Brahma represents the unimaginable and invisible God. Brahma is said not
to have the direct worship. Since the absolute God is unimaginable, you can
never worship the absolute God directly. Shiva represents the invisible but
imaginable energy, which is in the form of waves. Shiva is also worshipped
in the form of Lingam, which is in the form of a wave. This energy
indicates the soul. Vishnu represents the visible and imaginable matter
representing body. Vishnu is worshipped in the form of materialized statue.
All these three together constitute the human incarnation. All these three
components together are taken as one entity only without differentiation.
The God is identified with both the soul and body and hence, the human
form consisting of both body and soul is taken as God.
The word Aatreya denotes the human being in which both body and
soul are identified with each other, is taken as God. In this way, the
unimaginable and invisible God is given to the devotees as visible and
imaginable body with which already the invisible and imaginable soul is
identified. This process of transformation of God into human body is true
for all practical purposes even though theoretically each component has
separate identity. In the same way, the unimaginable God is given to the
energetic living beings [exist in upper worlds] in the form of energetic
body, in which the matter is absent. However, the three components can be
still maintained in the energetic incarnation also by taking the inert energy
as the first component representing the body and the second component is
the awareness representing the soul. The inert energy and the inert matter
can be treated as the same component and the only difference is that the
122
inert matter is visible and the inert energy is invisible. The common
essential property is that both are inert. The awareness is also energy but
the difference is that the energy is inert and the awareness is not inert. In
this way, the materialized human body of this world, the energetic body of
the upper world and the soul are inter-linked with each other forming the
sub- parts of the creation.
Hence, there is no difference between the energetic form and the
human form of Lord Dattatreya. The only difference is that the energetic
form of Datta is for the upper world and the materialized human form of
Datta is for this world. The energetic form of Datta is also not different
from the other energetic forms of God. The difference is only in the form of
the energetic body. Of course, the energetic form of Datta gives the full
information of the absolute God, which is that God is creator, ruler and
destroyer of the creation and that God is only one. The philosophy of the
human incarnation and the energetic form of Dattatreya is one and the same
representing the single entity of the three components, which is the basic
concept of any divine energetic incarnation or any divine human
incarnation.
123
40
you are the God. Earning the livelihood comes under the self-awareness
only and not selfishness. You must maintain yourself and other selves in
the family so that all of you shall be alive to be in the devotion to God.
Without livelihood the self disappears and you must maintain the self to
have at least the self-awareness. You can also help any hungry soul by
providing the food so that the soul will maintain itself and get devoted to
God. God created the souls for the sake of His entertainment. The life of
His entertainment is the devotion for which, the maintainence of the soul
is essential. Therefore, God created the natural instinct in every soul to earn
the livelihood for the maintainence of its life. If any soul resists this instinct
and does not act as per the instinct, such a soul will subject to the
displeasure of the God. If you follow the instinct, you are co-operating with
the maintainence of the drama of the entertainment of God.
Selfishness is involved in the unnecessary extra earning for the sake
of luxuries. The environmental sciences prove that any luxury is harmful
not only to the individual but also to the society. The science also proves
that absence of luxury, maintains perfect health of any human being.
Therefore, selfishness is born out of the ignorance of scientific knowledge.
The knowledge of science in real sense can eradicate the selfishness and
spiritual knowledge is not necessary for this purpose. Selfishness is the
harmful love towards yourself and other selves. Sacrifice is the best
medicine for this disease of selfishness. Selfishness is the excess of love to
self, which is the extra love. The love to self required up to the
maintainence by earning livelihood is appreciable to God also. The
attraction to luxuries indicates the extra unnecessary love to the self, where
the love to God finds no place. When the water tank is full and is over
flowing, where is the space for more water to pump in? Therefore, the heart
must be vacant to fill with the love to God. The minimum water level,
which is the instinct for livelihood is essential. To make the pump work for
sucking the ground water, some water must be poured into the pump. This
poured water is the essential requirement for sucking the ground water.
Selfishness is not some material to be blown away applying some
physical instruments and physical forces. It is conceptual nervous energy
existing in the mind and the concept is totally wrong. A wrong concept can
be removed by right concept only. A diamond can be cut by another
diamond only. Of course, while cutting the diamond, not only another
diamond is required but also the force in the process of cutting is
required. Another diamond is knowledge and the force in the process of
cutting is devotion. Therefore, the right concept associated with devotion to
God can only succeed in destroying the selfishness. When the selfishness is
125
cut at the root, your service to God will be perfect and will please God. The
service to God with selfishness will not fetch you the real grace from God.
You can only receive some boons to satisfy your selfishness. In fact, the
selfishness grows more and more by the boons just like the fire grows
more and more by receiving the ghee. The process of pacification of
selfishness increases it more and more. You can never subside the
selfishness by such process of pacification. The selfishness really subsides
when it is cut by knowledge associated with devotion. Then your service to
God without selfishness will fetch you the real and immense grace from the
God.
126
41
being can be a representative model of the world because both the human
being and the world are made of matter and energy only. In the case of
human incarnation, even though I have understood God and human being
clearly as different entities, I cannot separate the human being and God. I
can separate the soul or energy and the body or matter clearly and even see
them separately. In the case of human incarnation, I can see and imagine
human being but I can neither see nor even imagine God separately from
the human being. I know that the human incarnation is also a case of
superimposition but I cannot prove it practically as in the case of matter and
energy in the human being. It is inevitable superimposition. I have to take
the unimaginable God as the imaginable human being. Similarly, I have to
see the invisible God as visible human being. This does not mean that every
human being is to be seen or imagined as God. We have to confine this
point to human incarnation only. Therefore, there is no alternative way than
to see or imagine God as the imaginable or visible human being in the
human incarnation. The Veda says that there is no other way than this
(nanyah panthah) while describing God as a specific human being
(purusha).
The Gita takes the concept of superimposition of the body and the
soul as an example to clarify the concept of superimposition in the second
chapter itself. Shankara also explained concept of superimposition of
body and soul as an introduction for the concept of a specific human
being and God, where the separation is practically impossible. Even in
theory, the separation is accepted but the separation is a failure since the
separated God is unimaginable. Therefore, the monism is prefect in the case
of human incarnation regarding God and human being. In fact, the monism
of Shankara is only with reference to the human incarnation. The
specific reference is lost and hence, monism is generalized to conclude that
every human being is God. You should not take the soul as God and the
body as the world. The Gita has clearly introduced God as the third entity
called as Purushottama (Yasmaat ksharamatiitoham). Therefore, you
must not separate God from the human being in the human incarnation.
Hanuman and Gopikas never entertained such separation even in their
single thought.
128
42
God (Mamtu veda na kaschana). The common point between God and
soul is that both are invisible and the difference is that God is
unimaginable, whereas the soul is imaginable. With the help of the common
point, you can jump from the lower level to the higher level. With the help
of the difference, you can distinguish both and avoid misunderstanding that
both are one and same. Therefore, body is not the soul and soul is not the
God. The common point gives the possibility of misunderstanding. Due to
common white luster, you mistake the conch shell as silver. In the olden
days, the energy was not only invisible but also unimaginable. Therefore,
without any trace of doubt, the energetic soul was mistaken as God. Slowly,
the development of science clarified the energy as a part of the imaginable
creation and not the unimaginable creator. The invisible property is lost
because the energy becomes visible through instruments. The nature of the
energy is deeply studied and is well understood that energy is in the form of
waves and the characteristics of the waves like wave length, frequency,
amplitude are well understood. This makes the energy imaginable. Science
has removed the total illusion and perfectly clarified that the soul is neither
invisible nor unimaginable. Hence, it is clear conclusion that the soul is not
God, who is invisible and unimaginable. The separation of body and soul
helps the separation of soul and God. Therefore, the separation of body
and soul is introduced in the beginning itself and the separation of soul
and God is clarified at a later stage in the Gita. As the Gita advances
nearing its completion, the materialized body (kshara), the energetic soul
(akshara) and the unimaginable God (purushotamma) are clearly mentioned
separately as the triad.
There is no problem in separating body and soul since the separated
soul can be seen clearly in the lower receiver and the separated body is
clearly seen on the upper precipitation funnel. Therefore, this separation is a
clear process of separating energy from matter. But, there is a serious
problem in the process of second separation. The upper precipitation funnel
shows the separated soul as the residue. But, below the funnel, the receiver
still remains vacant since the filtered God is neither seen nor even becomes
imaginable. This makes the existence of God doubtful. When the separated
item is not at all proved, even the process of separation becomes doubtful.
You say that the existence of God must be believed without proof of
perception. This is the situation of serious difficulty. Therefore, the God
must be represented by either matter or energy. It is better to represent the
invisible God by invisible energy because the common characteristic of
invisibility favors such selection. The difference that God is unimaginable
whereas the energy is imaginable is set aside for some time, but should be
130
131
43
FASTING IN RITUALS
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[June 21, 2011 Shri G Lakshman asked about the significance of
fasting on the days of rituals and for the sake of God.]
Swami replied: Pravrutti is the subject that is related to the human
beings with respect to other living beings in this world. The rules of
Pravrutti are called as dharma. The basic rule is that you should not hurt
any living being including yourself. As long as this basic rule is not
violated, the rules can be changed in any manner you like as per the need.
God becomes angry and will grant you the hell provided you violate the
basic rule. But, some ignorant people apply this punishment in hell to every
change of rule even though the basic rule is not violated. It is their
foolishness and rigidity of ignorance. They quote the rules and insist that
such rules must be strictly followed without any violation, even though the
violation of such rules does not damage the basic rule. It is the climax of
the ignorance that sometimes some foolish rules are insisted in spite of
the violation of the basic rule by such rules! Such climax of foolishness is
due to lack of knowledge of scriptures and lack of right analysis. Let Me
illustrate this with an example. On the day of the ritual related to the
anniversary of the departed parents, the foolish rule is that the doer of the
ritual should not drink even water till the priests eat the food. It is said that
the departed parents eat food through these priests. It is also said that if the
doer does not fast on that day, the departed souls become angry and curse.
The doer of the ritual is really tortured because while the priests enjoy the
food on one side, on the other side, the doer has to prepare the balls of food
(pinda). The doer is burning with hunger and before him, the priests enjoy
the food. At the same time, he has to prepare the pinda by mixing the food
with ghee and dal resisting himself from eating.
Really, the departed parents are pained since their issue is suffering
with hunger and curse the priests for doing such sin in ignorance. The first
point is that the departed soul will not eat the food through the priest. By
giving food to the deserving priests, a good action (punyam) is done, the
fruit of which is protection of the departed souls. But, remember that if the
priests are undeserving, the donation of food becomes a sin and the
departed souls will undergo more punishments in hell. A departed soul is
132
always in the energetic body and the energetic body takes energy only as
food. The departed soul in hell is actually punished with hunger since the
supply of energy is stopped. Since energy is nervous energy, the soul will
have hunger and thirst (manomayah pranashariraneta Veda). In the
heaven, there is no hunger and thirst due to continuous supply of energy
(ubhetirtvaa Veda). In between heaven and hell, the soul may go to
pitruloka and the supply of energy is from moon (nirvishtasaram). These
three ways are for a non-devoted soul. The fourth path for departed devotee
is the abode of God and such ritual is not at all necessary (nahitenapathaa
tanutyajah). Therefore, the departed soul never requires the materialized
food. But, giving food to a deserving priest is recommended to help the
departed soul. The departed soul is said to enjoy the food through the priest,
but this is said to make everybody to perform this good action atleast by
fear. Therefore, such a fabricated trick is not applicable to a person, who
does the good action even without the necessity of such fear. Such a
fabricated trick is meant for a miser, who does not donate food to anybody.
Such a trick is also necessary, which is called as arthavada. Therefore, the
entire ritual is based on a single point that whether the priest is deserving
or non-deserving.
In these days, the deserving priests are almost nil. Assuming that we
have achieved the deserving priest, the doer should not fast and become
weak. He cannot perform the ritual in the absence of energy in his body. If
he suffers with hunger, the departed parents will be pained and will curse
the priest. Even the scripture says that the doer of a ritual should take
limited food on the day of a ritual. The scripture says that a Brahmin should
take milk and other castes can take some solids also, on a ritual day (payo
brahamanasyavratam Veda). You should not fast without food leading to
weakness and you should not over eat resulting in sleep. Fasting means
taking limited food. Brahmacharya means confining to one wife and does
not mean not marrying at all. The Veda and the Gita say that limited food
is always good (yuktaahaara, adyatetticha). According to the
constitution, you can take liquid or solid food in limited quantities on that
day. Here, Brahmin means delicate constitution with weak digestion and
hence, milk is recommended. Therefore, if you recommend fasting without
water, it is against the scripture also. But, these ignorant priests recite only
the scripture without knowing its meaning.
When the mother of Shankara died, He became ready to do the rituals.
Ignorant priests resisted that and He was not allowed to go to the burial
ground because a saint should not perform the rituals. Therefore, He
cremated His mother in the backyard of her home. When priests opposed it
133
135
44
about the existence of God is quite natural because there is every chance to
doubt about the existence of anything, which is not understood even by
intensive imagination. The human incarnation declares the existence of God
after giving the practical proof. In fact, people experience the unimaginable
events in their life, which indicate God. But, people do not care to analyze
and remember God thereby. Even if we dispose all the miracles as magic
show without careful analysis, the existence of unimaginable boundary of
universe, which can be realized by anybody at anytime, is a clear proof for
existence of unimaginable entity called as God.
God is said to be beyond this universe. It means that God can be seen
after crossing the boundary of universe. You will reach the land after
crossing the boundary of the ocean since the land is beyond ocean. You can
never reach the boundary of the universe by any amount of even intensive
imagination. This means that you can never imagine God and God is
always unimaginable. Beyond the boundary of space, space should not exist
just like beyond the boundary of ocean, water (ocean) should not exist.
Since God is beyond space, space or spatial dimensions cannot exist in
God. You can never imagine anything, which has no spatial dimensions.
Therefore, Gods existence is proved by the unimaginable miracles and
God is unimaginable due to absence of spatial dimensions. The Veda
clearly says that God is beyond words, mind, intelligence and the logic. It
also says that anything in the space or universe is not God since everything
in the universe has some spatial dimensions (Neti...Neti...). It also says that
God is the generator of space (Atmana Akashah). The generator should
not have the product in itself since the product should not exist before its
generation. Therefore, God has no space or spatial dimensions and hence, is
unimaginable. The Veda finally concludes that the only imagination about
God is that He is unimaginable (Yasyaamatam) and the only information
about God is that He exists (Astityeva).
Science says that the universe has no cause but exists. The same
status can be extended to God. Therefore, God need not have a creator.
The existence of unimaginable God is proved by the existence of
unimaginable boundary of this universe. You call the unimaginable
boundary of the universe itself as God. When we say that God is beyond the
universe, we mean that God is just at the unimaginable boundary of the
universe like the land beyond the boundary of ocean. Now the link between
God and universe as cause and effect can be inferred by the inference of the
existence of an intellectual administrator for the wonderfully arranged
systematic universe for which mere inert randomness cannot be the cause.
137
become close to God only when God is pleased with you. God is not like
the inert fire to be approached at your wish. You must satisfy God in His
tests through your sacrifice of anything including life for His sake. When
God is satisfied by your true devotion, you will become very close to Him
and this is called as Sayujyam, which is quite opposite to Moksha or
salvation. You have to prove yourself as a true devotee through practical
sacrifice to attain Sayujyam. Sayujyam is the subject related to God
(Nivrutti) and Moksha or salvation is subject related to you (Pravrutti).
Hanuman tried to sacrifice His life in searching for Sita and Gopikas
sacrificed their lives by jumping into fire after Krishna. Therefore, Nivrutti
is full of sacrifice, problems and tensions, which is called as the path of
thorns. Salvation or Pravrutti is the path of effort to achieve happiness for
the self. The ignorant people due to lack of knowledge and analysis use the
word salvation in the spiritual path. When Krishna was suffering with headache and the dust of the feet was declared as medicine, no devotee
including the wives of Krishna and even Narada came forward fearing for
the hell. Everybody wants relief from the torture of the hell even though
God is tortured by the head-ache. But, Gopikas came forward to give dust
from their feet and were ready to go to hell because their sole aim is only
happiness of God and not the self happiness.
Therefore, all the devotees are in the path of salvation and Gopikas
and Hanuman alone are in the path of Sayujyam. All the practices of yoga
are only medical exercises and are related to salvation only without any
reference to God. But, ignorant people are mislead to think that yoga is a
divine practice related to God. Jesus gave life through crucifixion for the
sake of God since it was the program designed by God. He imagined the
torture and prayed Lord to avoid it if possible. This prayer indicates the
climax of torture. But, finally, He said that the will of God must prevail.
Through sacrifice and torture only Jesus became very close to God and sat
on the right lap of the Lord. Since there is no liberation of the self from the
tension here, this is not salvation but is a case of Sayujyam. Even Shankara
denied salvation as the first item in the list of items of rejection (Na
mokshasyaakaankshaa). If the salvation is divine, He should not have
rejected it. This is the best supporting evidence of the concept.
139
45
140
Kshara-Akshara-Purushottama
8) The Gita gives another classification at a later stage, which gives three
items. The first item is kshara standing for the visible and imaginable
gross body. The second item is akshara standing for the invisible and
imaginable soul. The third item is Purushottama standing for the invisible
and unimaginable God.
The second classification does not contradict the first classification. In
both the classifications, the unimaginable and invisible God is one item,
which is called as Purusha in the first classification and Purushottama in the
second classification. The prakruti of the first classification is split into two
items viz., kshara and akshara of the second classification. Hence, both the
classifications are one and the same.
The Advaita philosophers take purusha as the soul, which itself is
God and prakruti as the gross body as per the first classification. But, the
second classification contradicts the first as per this view. Then, they split
the soul or God into two sub-divisions;
i. Atman, which is the pure awareness and
ii. Jeeva, the pure awareness modulated into different forms or subchannels called as gunas or feelings.
Atman is un-modulated basic pure awareness and jeeva is a bundle of
ideas, which are various modulations or signals of the same pure awareness.
They justify the jeeva as the akshara or eternal since jeeva is not destroyed
with reference to the destroyed body. Now, they take atman as
Purushottamma or God. We do not oppose the sub-division of atman and
jeeva. The sub-division is correct. But, we say that the un-modulated pure
awareness called as atman is not God or Purushottamma. God is the creator
of this infinite real world. The un-modulated pure awareness is unable to
create even an atom of this real world. Therefore, atman is not even a tiny
part of God. Creation of dream by atman cannot be justified since dream is
not even a tiny part of the real world. Therefore, atman is not
Purushottamma. Atman is the inert energy generated by digestion of food,
which is converted into a specific work form in a specific machine, called
as nervous system. The bundle of the various modulations of the same
atman is called as jeeva. Atman is just like standstill water and jeeva is a
bundle of waves present in water. By practice, the modulations can subside
and atman can be achieved by the disappearance of jeeva through the
process of meditation. Atman is basically a small quantity of inert energy,
which is a part of the infinite inert cosmic energy, called as Brahman. The
word Brahman is used for several great items of the creation. In this way,
141
142
46
electrified wire in which the electricity is identified with the wire. Since the
wire gives the electric shock anywhere, we do not differentiate the wire and
electricity. Similarly, the human being and God are not differentiated in the
human incarnation. For the ordinary looks, the electrified wire looks like an
ordinary wire only. But, if the looks are impregnated with analytical
knowledge, the same wire is just the electricity. Similarly, Baba is a human
being for ordinary public. For devotees, He is just Lord Narayana. You
cannot bring both the angles to one place in one time since both contradict
each other.
144
47
PARIPURNA ADVAITA
Shankaras Advaita is Context-Specific
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[July 03, 2011] The true Advaita of Shankara is only in the aspect of
enjoying this creation by a soul just as God enjoys it. The following
analogy is given to understand this concept. The director-cum-producer of a
cinema, after producing the cinema, himself sits in the audience to watch
and enjoy it. His helper also sits along with him and enjoys the cinema. In
this aspect of enjoying the cinema as spectators, there is no difference
between the two. Of course, this similarity does not make the helper
identical with the producer of the cinema. In the context of the producing
of the cinema, the difference between the two always remains. But, once
the cinema is already produced, there is no relevance of bringing in that
difference, which is present in the context of production. Only the context
of watching and enjoying the cinema is relevant. In this context, there is no
difference between the helper and the producer.
God is that director-cum-producer of the cinema of creation. The
ordinary individual soul is the helper. In the context of producing the
cinema, there is obviously a difference between the two. God has created
this creation while the soul cannot even create an iota of creation. But, once
the process of creation is over and it is time to merely watch it like a
cinema and enjoy it, there is no need to bring in that difference between
God and the soul. God enjoys all the aspects in this creation-cinema. He is
not disturbed by the tragedies or comedies in it but derives equal enjoyment
from both. Likewise, the soul too can derive equal enjoyment from both if
the soul can remain uninvolved with the creation. Hence, Shankara said
that the soul is the same as God. This is Advaita or monism. For the process
of watching and enjoying the cinema of creation, awareness (Chit) alone is
required; no creative powers are required. This awareness is the essence of
this common spectatorship of both God and the soul. Shankara called this
common awareness as Brahman. In the aspect of this awareness (Brahman),
both Jiva (soul) and Ishwara (God) are said to be equal. Hence, Shankaras
view is also called as Chinmatra Vadathe view that awareness (Chit)
alone is true (relevant). The Jiva can remain in the same God-like state of
145
by the joys and tragedies of the world. But, unfortunately, they chose the
path of disconnecting themselves from the world. So, they have even lost
the enjoyment or entertainment from the world. In this aspect, they have
gone far from the state of God. Gods state of unattached spectatorship is
very different from such Avadhutas. God is unaffected while enjoying the
creation where as avadhuta is unaffected by disconnecting himself totally
from the enjoyment. The final effect is one and the same but there is lot of
difference in the background.
The state of the Gopikas is different from the Avadhuta. Their case is
like that of the helper, who sits in the cinema hall with the producer, but
stops watching the cinema and instead turns towards the producer to win
his favor. The Avadhuta is one, who stops watching the cinema but does
not turn to the producer either. He simply goes off to sleep. The Gopikas
turned away from the world and turned towards Lord Krishna. They knew
that only through His grace, it is possible to enjoy the creation-cinema in an
unattached manner. So, they turned to Him to attain His grace, through
practical devotion (service). There is one thing common between the
Gopikas and the Avadhutathey both have stopped watching the creationcinema. But, the major difference between them is that the Gopikas are
turned to the Lord and are taking effort (sadhana) to achieve His grace.
They have surrendered to God. There is hope that they will attain His grace
and with that grace, they will attain the God-like state of constant
entertainment as an unattached spectator of creation. The Avadhuta has no
such hope, since he is not even trying for the grace of God. He foolishly
thinks that he is already God, simply because he has disconnected himself
from creation and is not affected by it. He is actually full of ego and he will
never attain the state of God. In fact, he has no hope of even attaining the
state of the Gopikas.
This path of turning away from the cinema and turning towards
God (like the Gopikas) is called as Nivritti. Nivritti contains Pravritti.
Nivritti is impregnated with Pravritti. They are not different. The reason for
the detachment from the world must be the attachment to God.
(seekers) have to go through all the earlier stages, where they can get
distracted by the world. When selfishness enters ones mind, one falls from
the state of pure (selfless) devotion. But, in spite of these failures, one must
repeatedly practice turning to God again. The Gopikas were sages in their
past birth. They too had gone through all these stages earlier. Turning to
God means developing attachment to God. Attachment to God will
automatically reduce the attachment to the world. It is not necessary to
forcibly detach from the world. Such forcible detachment is worthless and
it will never be permanent either. In fact, one should not try to do it.
Forcible detachment is going on the path of becoming an Avadhuta. This
is certainly not the goal. One should taste divine nectar (Amritam). The
attachment to coffee or any other worldly drink will automatically vanish.
There is no need to take any special effort to forcibly develop detachment
from coffee. One should take efforts to develop attraction towards ones
studies; not forcibly abstain from watching the television. Thus, ones
effort should only be towards developing attachment to God. The
weakening of the attachment to the world will be an automatic
consequence. Attachment to God is called devotion. Prahlada never tried to
detach from the world (Vairagya). He only developed devotion (bhakti).
His detachment towards the world was automatic. Thus, Vairagya is an
automatic consequence of bhakti.
Devotion is the product of knowledge. Without knowledge, there
cannot be devotion. Jnana yoga (path of knowledge) is the foundation of
bhakti yoga (path of devotion). Therefore, Lord Krishna started preaching
the Gita with the Sankhya yoga (path of knowledge). Even Rukmini first
got knowledge about Lord Krishna from sage Narada. That knowledge of
the Lord automatically developed devotion for Him in her heart. Through
knowledge, the devotion for God gradually increases in our heart.
Proportionally, our attachment to the world also weakens. Bhakti or
devotion automatically leads to practice (service). Service need not be
considered as a separate step. It is the second part of devotion called as
practical devotion. In fact, knowledge too is not different from devotion
since it causes devotion. It can be said to be the causal factor or foundation
for devotion. Thus, devotion encompasses all three
9) knowledge, which is the foundation for devotion
10) devotion itself, which is the strong determination in the mind
11) service, which is practical devotion or the proof of ones devotion.
Thus, jnana yoga (knowledge) and karma yoga (service) are included
in bhakti yoga (devotion). The three steps of knowledge, devotion and
service can be reclassified in any way as per ones convenience. In fact,
149
they are only one. Hence, Lord Krishna says that the one, who sees
knowledge and action as one, is the true seer (Ekam Sankyam cha yogam
cha Gita). Knowledge and action (service) can be seen to be one in the
intermediate step called devotion. The two merge in devotion. Turning
towards God or developing attachment towards God means all these three.
Sadhana, thus includes knowledge, devotion and service.
No doubt the sadhaka will slip and fall on this path of sadhana. But,
he has to rise again taking the support of the rope of knowledge. The
knowledge will again generate devotion to God. That devotion will be
tested in the sadhakas ability to do practical service for the contemporary
human incarnation of God. Thus, he has to proceed persistently. The state
of continuous entertainment through unattached spectatorship is
Paripurna Advaita (full and complete oneness with God) and it can be
attained by such persistent effort. This is the state of the human incarnation
of God. This state is even higher than the state of the Gopikas. This status is
given to that soul, who has attained the grace of God through his spiritual
effort (sadhana). God enters such a soul and he becomes a human
incarnation of God Himself. Then, He can enjoy the world as a cinema
without getting affected by it. He can enjoy like God because He has
become God. This is Paripurna Advaita.
world. He will be grateful to God for them all. He will thank God every
moment of his life; even during the greatest tragedy. God Himself enjoys
creation in this way. Lord Rama enjoyed even through the many tragedies
in His life.
Thus, one does not see any difference between the three gunas (three
fundamental qualities in creation). The qualities of Rajas (activity, passion)
and Tamas (ignorance, rigidity) are the so-called bad qualities. They are
represented by Lord Brahma (Creator) and Lord Shiva (Destroyer)
respectively. Sattvam (purity, knowledge) is the good quality, which is
represented by Lord Vishnu (Maintainer). Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva are
said to be equal. This means that the qualities that they represent are also
equal. Good and bad are equal. Chillies and sweets are equal. All the three
qualities are equal because they are equally important as means for getting
complete entertainment in creation. The chillies are necessary to enjoy the
sweet later on. The hero and the villain of a movie, both get equal
remuneration. Both are equally important in giving entertainment to the
audience. None is to be rejected or criticized.
This is the highest perspective. It is called the Brahmi Sthiti (God-like
state). The person, who is established in this state, is never disturbed by the
joys or tragedies of the world. Even as he breathes his last, he enjoys his
own death, like God (Esha Brahmi SthitiBrahma Nirvana Mrichchhati
Gita). This was the state of Lord Krishna. He enjoyed throughout His entire
life. He enjoyed as He cheated the Gopikas and stole their butter (Vanchate
Parivanchate Shri Rudram, Veda). Even the Gopikas enjoyed that
cheating. That is the highest state of devotion, which is possible only with
the highest knowledge. Krishna enjoyed even His own defeat by running
away from Kalayavana. Finally, He enjoyed His own death too. This shows
how Krishna and His devotees (Gopikas) practically saw the oneness in the
three gunas and derived constant entertainment.
152
48
153
in the case of his daughter and gainer in the case of his daughter-in-law
because the share is important and not the magnitude of the share. There is
no question of profit and loss, when you do not look in the angle of the
magnitude of the share. You must think that you are just following the
justice, which is the command of God through the scripture. If this
concept is followed by every individual in the society, the present crimes on
the girl will naturally subside.
Traditional practice is also built up in a special way to feel that
daughter is an outsider and the son belongs to the family. In order to
accomplish this, the surname and gotram of the girl are changed after the
marriage. The surname and gotram give the address of genetic
characteristics of an individual, which can never change. If you keep the
mango fruit in the basket of bananas, the mango will not become banana
fruit. This change is only apparent (gauna) and not real (mukhya). When
you keep your child in the house of your friend, you say that the child is
their child. Really, the child never becomes their child. Similarly, when the
daughter is sent to others house, you change her surname and gotram so
that they feel that the girl belongs to their line of dynasty. Thus, this change
is only apparent and not real. Therefore, the child born to a couple gets
both surnames and both gotras. Hence, the child should not marry in
future in both gotras. You may be called by one surname and gotram. The
other surname and the other gotram remains silent. Suppose you have a
long name. People call you by a part of your nane only for convenience. It
does not mean that the other part of the name is vanished. Therefore, the
daughter of maternal uncle is sister and the daughter of the sister is also
daughter. Marrying both is against the sanction of ethical scriptures. This
aspect is exploited to feel that the girl is an outsider.
The parents are also threatened by the son that if entire property is not
given to him, he will not perform the rituals after death. This is again
exploitation of misunderstanding only. Actually, the soul after death enters
energetic body and has no connection with the food fed to the priest after
death. The soul after death goes in two paths as said in the Gita (shukla
Krishna gatee). In the first path, the soul goes to the abode of God and in
this path, the soul does not require the food given to priest in the annual
ceremony (nahi tena pathaa tanutyajah tanayaavarjita panda
kaamshinah). In the second path, the soul either goes to heaven or Pitru
Loka or hell. In heaven, there is no need of food and water
(ubheteertvaa). In Pitru Loka, the food is the light of moon (nirvishta
saaraam pitrubhih). In hell, the soul is tortured suffering with hunger and
thirst and no food and drink are allowed (jaayaswa mriyaswa...). In all
155
these four paths, the soul is covered by energetic body, which does not
require any matter as food. Energetic body requires energy only as food.
This does not mean that you should not give food to a deserving priest. If
you give food to any deserving person in the name of the departed soul,
the soul is certainly blessed. Giving food to a deserving person need not be
done with specific tradition only. In such case, such specific tradition does
not exist in all the countries of the world. There cannot be universality of a
specific tradition, which does not exist everywhere in the universe. If you
stress on the specific tradition, the universality is disturbed and God
becomes partial for giving such tradition to a limited part of the world only.
The essence of the ritual is giving food to any deserving person. This
essence is universal and is being practiced everywhere in the world.
Therefore, even the daughter can give food, clothes and subscription
(dakshina) to a deserving person in the name of her departed parents.
Such act becomes equal to the ceremony conducted by the son in a specific
tradition. The essence of the ritual is important and the tradition has no
significance. The doubt comes about the ancient saying that if you do not
perform the ceremony, the departed parents suffer with hunger. This is
called as artha vaada, which means a lie proposed to achieve some good
purpose. A greedy person may not sacrifice food to a deserving person
unless the fear (that his departed parents suffer with hunger) does not exist.
This is created for a good purpose, which is exploited by the son, to
demand the entire property. A lie is not wrong if it serves good purpose.
The mother feeds her child saying that the moon comes down if the child
eats the food. The mother has told a lie for good purpose only and hence, it
is not wrong. Charvaaka criticized that how the departed soul can get the
food if the priest is fed? He told that in such case, the father sitting in the
upstairs should get his food that is given to somebody else in the down
stairs. This criticism of Charvaaka is not completely correct. The departed
soul does not get the food since it is in the energetic body. But, the fact is
twisted to inculcate the sacrifice in a greedy person. Charvaaka has not
understood the whole background. Of course, we should condemn the
exploitation of this by somebody. The economic suppression of women is
the reason for the poverty of the country because the deity of wealth,
Shree Maha Lakshmi is also a woman. This is the reason for the revolt of
women against the males. Similarly, when the poor people are exploited
and are looted by the rich business people and politicians due to their blind
love to their families, the poor people revolt. This is the background of
naxalism, which is the cause for the birth of naxalists, who want to
transform the society through riffles. But, such transformation is not real
156
and permanent. Knowledge is the most powerful riffle and the preacher of
the knowledge is the most powerful naxalite.
He has another friend in civil dress. The son of the police officer is always
exposed to him in the civil dress. Hence, the son praises the friend of the
father in civil dress and scolds the other friend in uniform. The ignorant son
does not know that his father in the civil dress is the same person in the
uniform. He mistakes his father in the uniform as an outsider and even
scolds him.
Both naxalism and terrorism should be removed to bring the peace in
society, which is the main essence of pravrutti. Unless you follow the
ethics, which is the commandment of God, how can you please Him in
nivrutti or spiritual path? If you disobey God in pravrutti, you cannot please
Him in nivrutti because God is one and the same in both the subjects.
158
49
is the negative angle of the idol worship. To remove this negative angle, the
idol worship is condemned by Swami Dayananda Saraswati, who was also
a human incarnation. He opposed the concept of human incarnation like
Mohammad since there are some negative aspects of this concept. The
genuine human incarnation may not be properly received by the public
suffering with ego and jealousy and their violent reaction was seen in the
case of Jesus. The other negative angle is that the fraud human incarnations
may exploit the society.
The policy of the programme of any human incarnation depends on
the psychology of the public with which it has to interact. Swami
Dayananda rejected the idol worship since a rat stole the food offered to
Shivalingam in a temple. Swami told that there is no Lord in the
Shivalingam since it is only a stone. This concept arrests the exploitations
of the idol worship. This does not mean that Swami is unaware of the
merits of idol worship. Sometimes, the concept should be de-rooted
completely in order to condemn the strong exploitation of the concept.
Once the exploitation disappears, the concept can be again re-installed. Shri
Ramakrishna Parama Hamsa also existed in the time of Swami Dayananda.
Shri Parama Hamsa was a priest in the temple worshipping the idol. He
supported the idol worship. He said that you should view the idol as the
alive form. This means that you must catch the alive form of God through
the idol. Shri Parama Hamsa Himself was another human incarnation and
declared that He was Rama and Krishna. This means, He never asked you
to sit in the stage of the idol worship. The sense of His statement is that you
should feel as if you are worshipping the alive form during the service of
idol. Then only, the real devotion grows. The total story is that on one side,
Swami Dayananda condemned the negative sides of idol worship and on
the other side, Shri Parama Hamsa supported the positive sides of the idol
worship. The same God spoke simultaneously through both these human
forms.
The conclusion is that you should utilize any concept, accepting the
positive views and avoid the negative exploitations of the same concept.
Ignorant people misunderstand that Shri Parama Hamsa and Swami
Dayananda opposed each other. All the preachers existing in theism should
always be correlated in other concepts since the fundamental point of
existence of God is not violated. The difference in Them is only due to the
existing circumstances in their times, which have to be reformed.
161
50
USA cover or Indian cover. The photo or statue of Vishnu or Krishna does
not speak to you. You like this very much because you can express any
unjust desire before God and pray for its fulfillment. If Krishna or Vishnu
exists in the place of that statue or photo, certainly God will speak to you
and warn you against the unjust desire. The statue or photo keeps silent to
your unjust prayer and hence, you live with a hope of its fulfillment by
God. For this purpose, you do not want God to exist before you and hence,
God is not present in the photo or statue. You are rigid of your desire and
hence, the presence of God is not liked by you. This is also the reason for
your dislike to human incarnation since it criticizes you to turn you to the
right path. If there is a photo or statue of Krishna in the chariot, Arjuna
would have spoken his argument and simply would have returned from the
battle field. Majority of humanity belongs to such type of rigid ignorance
and hence, worships the idols only. God also responds to their prayers
fulfilling their unjust desires. What is the reason for such behavior of God?
God knows that you will not change by preaching the spiritual knowledge.
Since the stage of transformation has not come, God fulfils your desire so
that at least your faith in the existence of God is strengthened. In future,
you may believe the human incarnation as God and thus, accept Its spiritual
advice given by It and transform yourself. The already strengthened faith
with God will help you to implement the spiritual advice immediately in
practice. Some people recognize the human incarnation as God, but, do not
implement the advice of God due to lack of strength in the faith.
Dhrutarashtra knows that Krishna is God, but, could not implement His
advice in practice due to lack of strength of faith in God. Hence, the idol
worship is not waste and should not be criticized. It helps in strengthening
faith and devotion in God in the initial ignorant state of human being. It is a
sort of training in created false atmosphere. The soldier is trained to shoot
the target, which is inert. In the actual war, he has to shoot the counter
soldier, who is alive. Since the target is inert, you should not say that the
training is useless. Therefore, the statues and idols are sufficient to fulfill
your materialistic desires. Even though God is not present in the statue or
photo, the omniscient God hears your prayer and responds to it. Even if you
pray in open place thinking that God is formless, the omniscient God hears
your prayers. But, if you do not come to the real path by recognizing the
human incarnation, you cannot exploit God continuously. After
sometime, He leaves you to your fate, which is the cycle of your deeds
only. The chocolates are given in the initial childhood to go to school. If
you continuously demand the chocolates, the practice is discontinued
because excess of chocolates will lead you to diseases.
163
164
51
God and soul have the awareness. You say that awareness is soul and
therefore, soul is God. Then, you have to say that awareness is beggar and
therefore, the king is beggar. King and beggar are the two independent
entities. Awareness is a dependable property of both king and beggar.
Shankara feared that the soul may misunderstand that it is God and
therefore, consequently may think that the world is unreal. If the soul is
God and if the world is unreal to the soul, Shankara must have maintained
one angle only and might have told that the world is unreal (Asat). But,
Shankara told that world is neither real nor unreal in single angle since, it is
real in one angle and is unreal in another angle. Therefore, He stated that
the world is both real and unreal or neither real nor unreal since it is real in
one angle and unreal in another angle. Both these angles are referred by
Him as Paramartha dasha and Vyavahara dasha. The first stands for the
angle of God and the second stands for the angle of the soul. The world is
called as Maayaa, which means both wonderful (Maya- Vychitrye) and nonexistent (Yaa Maa Saa Maayaa). For the soul, the world is wonderful and
for God, it is non-existent.
All the above mentioned four categories are partially wrong and
partially correct. Even the atheists are partially correct because the world is
true for the soul. This aspect should never be forgotten by the soul because
it is a practical experience. A walking human being is always obstructed by
a wall since the wall is always real. The human incarnation like Shankara
may pass through bolted doors of the house of Mandana Mishra because
God is identified with the human being in that case and such context
becomes the angle of God in which the wall is proved to be unreal. But, by
this aspect alone you should not decide the human incarnation since a
demon like Ravana can also pass through the wall. Both Krishna and
Ravana can pass through the wall. But, Krishna alone can preach the Gita
and not Ravana. You can understand the difference if you can understand
the statement all gentlemen are human beings but all human beings are not
gentlemen.
The soul should never think that the world is unreal. In such case, the
soul itself becomes unreal since it is part and parcel of the world. The entire
world including the soul is unreal to God but the unreal world cannot be
unreal for the unreal soul. Unreal for unreal is always real. The God is
always unimaginable and the soul can never catch God. If the soul thinks
that the world is also unreal, then everything becomes zero including itself.
The real God is grasped by the soul when the real God identifies Himself
with a part of this real world. Such part is the human being and such part is
called as Human incarnation. The reality of the world is indicated by the
167
168
52
170
53
human being and hence, it thinks that it is the greatest devotee. In fact, it is
not even one percent devotee because its devotion is with negative sign.
This point should be clarified to the devotee. Therefore, God gives
difficulties and miseries to the devotee. In such case, the devotion vanishes
away. Then the devotee will realize that his devotion is only instrumental
but not ultimate. The devotee should not try to increase his devotion
because the devotion is in negative sign.
Therefore, the first step is to transform the devotion from negative
sign to positive sign. The positive sign is to love God without aspiring any
benefit or happiness in return. For this purpose, God gives misery to the
devotee. By this, one should not misunderstand that God is not associated
with bliss and is associated with misery only. The context here is to preach
the devotee to purify his devotion. This should not be mixed up with the
other context that God is always associated with bliss. The very fact that
God is associated with bliss spoils the devotees to get attracted for getting
bliss from God. The root meaning of the word Durga is that the God is to
be gained through misery (Duhkhena gamyate iti Durga). The meaning of
this word contains all the above analysis.
172
54
deserving people only. What is the first criterion of the deserving receiver
of your help or service? The Veda says that the essential criterion of the
receiver is not to expect anything from you. Thus, the receiver also is
trained in the same concept. Some people do not express their desire by
mouth but expect your help in their minds so that they impress upon you as
deserving. You are not omniscient to know the hidden ideas in their minds.
Therefore, there is every chance for you to slip in serving the undeserving
people. As far as possible, you must analyze and analyze.
You can do the help or service to any extent provided you conclude
the deserving receiver. Do not be hasty in doing service. Of course, the
basic needy, who are extremely poor, need not be analyzed. Since they are
in need of basic needs only, you need not apply the analysis to their case.
There is a saying: service to humanity is service to God. The meaning of
this statement is that you must train yourself in the service of humanity so
that you will succeed in the case of God, whenever the opportunity comes.
In the case of poor people, there is no chance of expecting anything in
return. Therefore, that is the best area to develop the pure devotion by
serving without aspiring anything in return. You serve the humanity. You
will also develop love to the human form, which will be useful in serving
the contemporary human incarnation of God without any repulsion to cohuman form. All the social service is only training for the service of God.
Without the ultimate service to God, mere social service gives you only
heaven from which you have to return after sometime as said in the Gita
(Kshene Punye).
174
55
basic initial difference, it is said that the other item is not affected. You
cannot bring perfection of the concept in the simile. This also proves that
the soul and intelligence stand only as an example but not the actual
concept. Shankara has taken the simile only in the relevance of atheists.
The actual concept was also revealed by Him, when He stated that He was
the human incarnation of God. When the atheist was converted into
devotee, the actual concept was revealed by Shankara.
In both the concept and simile, the two items are closely associated
and the close association is stated by the Mantra (Sayuja Sakhayaa). The
unimaginable God identifies Himself with the soul and the body also as
stated in the Veda (Antarbahishcha). In the case of ordinary human
being, the soul and intelligence are inseparably associated like water and
wave. Therefore, the effect of one item naturally falls on the other item.
But, this happens as a rule in the case of soul and intelligence since both are
imaginable items closely associated with each other. In the case of God
and soul (or even body), God is unimaginable and the soul is imaginable.
The effect of the imaginable item can never touch the other unimaginable
item i.e., God even if they are closely associated as in the case of human
incarnation. The simile for this concept must involve imaginable items only
since there is no unimaginable item other than God. When you take a simile
in which two imaginable items are closely associated, the interaction of the
effect one item on the other is inevitable because both are imaginable items
and also closely associated. When the unity or similarity between the two
imaginable items is more, the extent of interaction between them is also
more. All the imaginable items are basically linked to each other since
every imaginable item is basically energy only. Such basic unity and the
close association are favorable for the transmission of effect from one item
to the other. You have to forcibly stop the transmission of the effect at least
based on the assumed superficial difference. Then only you can explain the
concept through the simile. For this purpose, the assumed external
difference is magnified in the simile. You can say that the water remains as
water only irrespective of the magnitude of the kinetic energy that decides
the size of the wave. The water is one and the same in a small wave or a big
wave. This angle helps to explain the absence of effect of one item on the
other item. For the sake of explanation of the concept, you have to confine
to this angle only. You should not take the other angle in which the
formation of wave has affected the peaceful and standstill water leading to
the modification.
The water molecules in the wave are highly agitated due to influence
of the kinetic energy, whereas the same molecules in the stand still water
178
are unaffected. This angle proves that the effect of one item falls on the
other item. We have to forget this physical change of water and be satisfied
that there is no chemical change in the water. The absence of chemical
change should be only taken from the simile to understand that the
unimaginable God is not at all affected by the imaginable soul. Whenever
you take a simile for the concept, the desired aspect in the simile should
be only taken neglecting the other undesirable aspects. If you compare the
moon with the face, only the aspect of pleasant nature should be selected
rejecting the other aspects like black spots, appearance only in the night
etc., Similarly, in the simile i.e., soul and intelligence, the desirable aspect
is only that the soul is not affected by the intelligence like the absence of
chemical change in water due to formation of wave. Though, only the
convenient aspect is taken, it does not mean that the inconvenient aspect
does not exist. Hence, the Gita mentions both the aspects of unity and
difference between Atman (Soul) and Jeeva (represented by intelligence) in
the above mentioned verse.
Subject of Philosophy
Philosophy is the subject, which always deals with the concepts of
God only. Therefore, the unimaginable God and imaginable soul in the
human incarnation only can stand as the concept. The soul and intelligence
in an ordinary human being involving two imaginable items can be taken
only as a simile to explain the concept. If the subject is psychology or
zoology or physics, you may take the soul and intelligence as the concept
and bring water and wave as the simile. But, remember, here, both the
concept and the simile involve only imaginable items. Here, you explain
one part of the creation with the help of the other part of the creation. In
philosophy, the concept always involves the Unimaginable Creator and
the simile for the concept is always taken from the creation involving
imaginable items.
One way is to treat the soul as inert energy and the awareness
represented by intelligence as the other non-inert item. The awareness is a
specific work form of inert energy. In this way, the difference between the
soul and intelligence is very easy because the soul is inert energy
unaffected by the tensions of all the thoughts of awareness. This way is
mentioned in the Gita since the soul is said to be eternal (Nityah), all
pervading (Sarvagatah) and inert (Sthaanuh) cosmic energy. The limited
soul in the body is a minute drop and the external cosmic energy is the
infinite ocean. Even the body made of matter that separates the soul from
the external cosmic energy is also another form of energy, you can
179
180
56
Supporting Incidents
To give support to the above story of the interval, there are some
experiences of some people, who went up to the verge of death and came
back. They said that they have travelled long distance in darkness and then
light appeared in which a divine personality was seen. You may say that
these are poetic fabrications of these people. It is again a 50-50 probability.
It is better to accept their experiences, which coincide with the concept in
the above scientific analysis.
Another supporting point is that the human incarnation, which has
proven the existence of unimaginable power through unimaginable events
(miracles) also says that the concept of the scripture is correct. You must
give validity to His saying, since the unimaginable event was proven by
Him though demonstration. You may do away with the human incarnation
by saying that the miracles are magic. However, the acceptance of the
possibility of the scriptural concept already stands firm in the above
scientific analysis.
Hence, there is no harm in accepting the experiences of some
people, scriptural descriptions and the messages of human incarnations
supporting the scriptures, which are in line with the 50-50 probability
presented in the above scientific analysis. Therefore, the final conclusion is
that everyone, be it an atheist or a theist, should accept the rebirth, hell and
heaven declared by the scripture and follow all the scriptural precautions
carefully in this world. This concept rises in every mind in the old age since
the death is near and hence, this concept is clarified removing all
confusions.
183
57
for this in the interest of not only the devotee but also God. Such valid
reason is: the human being is made of ego, jealousy and negligence over the
attained or known things. As long as an item is unknown and is not
attained, the negligence, ego and jealousy subside. The human being
always regards the distant item and neglects the item, which is present
before the eyes. We can find this human nature by several examples and I
can give one or two of these. People worship the statue of the serpent today,
the Naga Panchami, with unimaginable devotion since the actual serpent is
not seen. When it appears, it is immediately killed! People neglect their
parents when they are alive and do not give meals even with one side dish.
But after their death, their yearly ceremony is performed with meals
containing at least dozen side dishes! In the case of serpents, the fear for
selfish harm is the reason. In the case of parents also, the same fear for the
selfish harm is the reason because if the yearly ceremony is not performed,
there is a fear that some harm will happen to him. This is the inherent
nature and even the angels are not exceptional to this as said in the Gita
(Paroksha Priya ivahi Devaah).
Even in the case of contemporary human incarnation, devotees
worship it with lot of devotion for sometime and negligence starts slowly.
God tested whether the human being makes God an exception to this
inherent nature. Such test is the observation of the human incarnation after
living with the devotees for sometime. The human being perfectly proved
that even God is not an exception to its inherent nature. Even the devotee
like Rukmini could not overcome this. She was daily drinking the hot milk
and the Lord was normal even after drinking the hot milk. One day
Rukmini gave the same hot milk to Radha. When Radha took that milk, the
skin of the Lord became red due to heat. The Lord told that this happened
since He is in the heart of Radha. The conclusion showed that the Lord was
not in the heart of Rukmini. Rukmini asked the Lord for the reason. The
Lord told that Radha was staying far and hence, the value of the Lord was
maintained by her. This proves that anybody staying far away will have
value. Therefore, God wants to stay far from the devotees by always
becoming unimaginable so that the value can be maintained. When the
value is broken, the Lord will feel more for it. He does not want to see the
break of His value and feel for it. Hence, God avoided this one miracle not
only in the interest of the devotee but also in His interest. The interest of
the devotees is that the devotee should not lose the Lord due to such
negligence.
185
58
188
59
themselves, since all these are ultimately the effects of the ultimate cause
only. Hence, all these effects are said to be existing, since their existence is
the existence of ultimate cause only. Even the modern scientists end with
space or energy only as the ultimate cause. The modern scientists have
identified the space as energy through the concept of bending of the space
around the boundary of the object. For the scientists, the space or vacuum is
energy, which is the ultimate cause that exists. Therefore, the entire
creation exists for scientists. The Buddhists just differed from the scientists
by one point only, which is that the space or vacuum is also absence of
energy and hence, non-existent. Hence, for Buddhists, the ultimate cause is
the non-existent vacuum and hence, the entire creation is non-existent. Both
Buddhists and scientists are partially correct and partially wrong. The truth
is that the vacuum or space is energy. But, the energy is also non-existent,
since it is not the ultimate cause. The energy is the first effect of the
ultimate cause [God]. First, the energy is produced and hence, first the
space is also produced, because space is energy. Therefore, the Veda says
that God created the space in the beginning. The same Veda says that God
created energy in the beginning. There is no contradiction because the
space is the same energy. The ultimate cause, which is the generator of the
space, should not have space (spatial dimensions) in it. Hence, the ultimate
cause becomes unimaginable due to absence of spatial dimensions. The
existence of unimaginable cause is also established in experience through
the exhibition of unimaginable events called as miracles. We have to
accept the existence of unimaginable entity through the unimaginable
miracles. Unimaginable means the absence of spatial dimensions only
because anything with spatial dimensions becomes imaginable. Thus, the
absence of spatial dimensions establishes the cause of space since only the
cause of space does not have spatial dimensions. All these points with the
experience prove the existence of the ultimate unimaginable cause.
God, the awareness, referred by Shankara here for the sake of Buddhists,
must be the awareness of God and not the awareness of the soul. Soul is not
the ultimate cause, which is an imaginable item, existing in the chain of
relative causes and relative effects only. At this point, Shankara did not
mention the word God because the atheistic Buddhists will not accept
God. Therefore, Shankara kept silent in naming the ultimate cause as God.
Therefore, Buddhists have accepted the existence of awareness and dropped
their concept of Shunyavada i.e., everything is nothing. Shankara did not
meddle with the concept further because at least the existence of something
is established, which is a step for the future establishment of existence of
God. But, there is a serious problem at this stage because the awareness
or soul is misunderstood as the ultimate cause and hence, the entire
creation becomes unreal for the soul. Shankara kept silent in spite of these
negative effects since any slight disturbance may reverse the atheistic
Buddhists. The serious result of these negative effects is that, the soul or
awareness is the ultimate Creator (Cause) of this entire creation. Since God
is the name given to such ultimate cause, Buddhists did not mind to say that
the soul, the ultimate cause, is called as God. Therefore, Buddhists agreed
that God is the ultimate cause of this Creation and God exists. The desired
result is achieved, but, the undesirable negative side effect is that such God
is the soul itself.
Shankara allowed these negative side effects in view of the greatest
success achieved in converting atheists into theists. These negative effects
resulted in the spiritual knowledge (Nivritti) were used to rectify the
worldly issues (Pravritti). The soul became God due to negative effect, but
this is used in positive sense to bring social justice. When you feel that you
are God, there need not be any scope for ambition because the highest is
achieved. It also brings self-confidence and full self-satisfaction. The
ambition for the worldly things leads to the concept of sin in the society.
This ambition is further reduced by another negative effect, which is that
the world is unreal for the soul, the ultimate cause. There is no need of
ambition to attain any unreal item. Thus, Shankara used all these negative
effects to establish the social balance. Such detachment from ambition is
also required in the effort to achieve the grace of God. Thus, these negative
effects are not only useful for Pravritti but also for Nivritti.
Soul is not the ultimate cause because soul is the awareness and
awareness is only the product of energy. Awareness is a specific work form
of the inert energy. Energy consists of particles or waves, which have
spatial dimensions. Therefore, soul, a form of energy, has spatial
dimensions and is imaginable. Since soul has space (spatial dimensions) in
191
it, the soul cannot be the generator of the space. The reason is that space
should not exist in its generator before its generation. Hence, space is not
the unimaginable God. Space is not the ultimate cause since it cannot create
even an iota of this real world. It may be the generator of the imaginary
world but not the real world. The awareness was established by Shankara as
a requirement to grasp the non-existence of the entire creation. But,
awareness is not an independent entity, which is only a dependable process
of some independent item only. Awareness is the process of knowing
something, which is work. Work is dependable property of some
independent working element. The awareness is the dependable work and
the independent working element is the soul, which is the inert energy.
Similarly, God is the independent item and the awareness of God is a
dependable property of God. Of course, all the items of the creation
including the soul are dependable properties of the ultimate independent
God. Hence, awareness is neither the soul nor the God. Even though all the
items of the creation are dependable properties, one dependable property,
the soul, can get the independent status of the working element with respect
to the other dependable property, the awareness and all this happens by the
will of God. Hence, the awareness proposed by Shankara can neither be
taken as soul nor as God. Hence, we said that the awareness proposed by
Him was the awareness of God. But, that awareness is misunderstood as
soul and here also it means that it is misunderstood as the awareness of the
soul.
192
60
continuously. This is the reason for the nine planets to rotate through their
sub-periods in a long good or bad period. Therefore, God has arranged the
incidents in your life in the best convenient manner for you. Hence, you
must allow the incidents of your life to take place in their own natural
way, which were set up by God. The fundamental role should not be
forgotten, which is that, you must enjoy the good or bad results of your past
deeds. Cancellation is impossible under any circumstances. Due to your
insisting prayers and worship, God postpones the bad results. But, you have
to enjoy them with compounded interest in the future. Dont be clever to
argue that God is not omnipotent if He cannot cancel a result. This
process of inevitable enjoyment of the results of the deeds is established
by God only. If He contradicts His own procedure, He becomes a bad
administrator. God is always the best administrator. Your ignorance of this
network and procedures of God makes you think that God cancelled your
bad result in the case of its postponement.
misunderstand God for His silence to your prayers. It is like the decision on
surgery of the doctor in spite of the protests from the patient. Therefore, do
not ask God for anything and meddle with the best way of already set up
system of deeds for you. God says that the devotee tries to interfere with the
already set up cycle of deeds and he is a useless stupid (Evam Pravartitam
Chakram Gita).
196
61
rising above all the sentiments, the truth is totally different. For such
situation, the reason is that Ravana stole away Sita in the forest. What is the
reason for such stealing of Ravana? The reason is the unimaginable cruel
words of Sita to Lakshmana, who protected her on the order of Rama.
While going away, Rama told clearly that the demons will play several
tricks and that Lakshmana should not leave Sita under any
circumstances. In spite of such serious message of Rama, Sita scolded him.
Lakshmana also told her that Rama is incarnation of God and nothing will
happen to Him. Sita created a false angle, blaming Lakshmana for his
unjust attraction towards Sita. Lakshmana said that he never looked at her
above her feet. What is the reply of the so called Associations of Women
for this unimaginable foolish behavior of Sita? Because of such behavior
only, Lakshmana left her and Ravana stole her and due to this only, the
statement of washerman is generated. Is not Sita responsible for this whole
episode?
Therefore, everybody concludes himself as good and others as bad
when he is the part of the case. In such situation, everybody should
immediately think in the reverse way and see the possibility of himself
being wrong and others being right. In fact, the analysis of God in the upper
world regarding your case is going to be always reverse. All your proposals
generally get disposed by God since your analysis is generally wrong. Try
to always think the reverse of your way of thinking. Then only, you can
understand the truth. Then only, the Pravrutti gets established with perfect
love and peace. This leads to the peace and harmony of the world.
198
62
Due to this reason, the wives of Krishna could not do that act. That piece of
cloth sacrificed for the Lord was multiplied as thousands of saris because
the rate of interest of the bank of God is infinite since the wealth in it is
infinite. If this service was done to a human being, hardly two or three saris
could have been supplied. Hence, the Lord could have supplied those saris
even if Draupadi did not weep. Even if she was silent leaving everything to
God, this miracle should have been done. The reason for the miracle is not
her weeping and begging. The reason is her practical sacrifice to God
especially the human incarnation. You may have faith in God but it is very
difficult to recognize the human incarnation and maintain continuous
faith in It. It has been the worst practice in all the religions since devotees
everywhere developed different talents and techniques in the art of weeping
and begging. Some devotees should be awarded Padma Vibhushan for
developing new trends in weeping and begging before God! God hates
you if you weep and beg anything from Him because you are aware of your
false devotion to Him. Your real devotion is towards yourself, your wife,
your children, your parents, your relatives and your friends only.
You know the truth of your false devotion and now you are trying to
cheat God by your art of weeping and different discovered sentences,
poems and songs of begging. It is a double crime. Hence, do not beg and
weep before God. Be always brave and dignified before God like Hanuman.
When you know that you do not deserve due to your false devotion, then
also you maintain the dignified way before God. In such case, it is only one
crime, which can be also rectified in course of time by developing true
devotion. You need not ask God for anything even in your mind. If there
is some credit of your true devotion in your account proved by practical
sacrifice, the reward will come from God spontaneously in the required
situation. Generally, people try to worship God in the times of difficulties.
The omniscient God knows that your intensity of the worship is generated
by the ambition for the solution of your problem and that it is not generated
by the true love to God. You should not intensify the worship in the time
of problems. You can fool the people but not the omniscient God. You
should maintain the same intensity of worship in all the times without
linking it to benefits and solutions of problems. Such true devotion will be
credited to the account. When Draupadi tore her sari and sacrificed for the
Lord, then she was in happy situation. Therefore, your sacrifice is valid if it
is done in the happy moment when there is no need for the help of God. At
any cost, you should stop weeping and begging before God and learn the
constant courage of Hanuman.
200
201
63
SECRET OF LIFE
Alternating Happiness and Misery
O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,
[January 01, 2012 New Year Message] The human being is reluctant
to miseries and enjoys the happy situation. The human being can be
compared to an ignorant child, who enjoys the sweets only and is
reluctant to chillies. Hence, such a human being is ignorant. The grown up
adult enjoys both sweets and chillies in the meals. Similarly, a realized soul
enjoys both happy situation and misery in the life. Therefore, it is only
ignorance, which is the inability of art of enjoyment. God created this
world with happiness and misery. People enjoy the cinema, which contains
both pleasant scenes and tragic scenes. Similarly, people enjoy both sweet
dishes and hot dishes in the meals. People enjoy the day and night. People
enjoy the hot summer and the cold winter. The whole life and creation is
full of alternating happiness and misery. If a person can enjoy both happy
times and miseries in the life, he is equal to God. You may say that God
enjoys the creation from outside. God also enters the creation in the form of
human incarnation and enjoys both pleasant times and miseries in the life
span. We see this truth in the life history of Rama and Krishna. The Veda
says that God enters the creation after creating it (Tadevanupraavishat).
Therefore, if you always crave for happiness only and reject miseries, it is
unnatural and also ignorance of a child. The knowledge of the Gita
preaches that you should enjoy even a top most misery, which is the time of
death (Sthitvaasyaamantakaalepi).
If you enjoy both miseries and happy situations, you are in a
continuous state of enjoyment. You think that continuous enjoyment comes
only through continuous times of happiness in the life. It is not correct. You
get bored if you are served only with sweet dishes in the meals. Boring is
misery. Therefore, misery is inevitable like summer after winter and winter
after summer. The Indians denote happiness through cooling. The
foreigners represent happiness through warming, which is heat. Therefore,
the happiness to one is misery to the other. What is the reason? The
foreigner is mainly exposed to winter, which bores him. Therefore, for a
foreigner, the heat is happiness. The Indian is mainly exposed to summer
202
203
64
speed. At any step, the cause is real and the product is unreal since the
reality of the product is based on the reality of the cause. But, the cause
itself is the product of another cause. This analysis went on ad-infinitum
and the final conclusion was that everything is unreal (Shunyavada of
Buddhists). In such situation, if you say that the ultimate cause is
unimaginable, people would just laugh at it by saying that the unimaginable
ultimate cause must be disposed more conveniently as unreal. The word
unimaginable indirectly means negation of a logical answer. With this
fear, Shankara proposed God as pure awareness having no attributes
(Nirguna). Later on, Ramanuja and Madhva also proposed God as
awareness with attributes as qualified (Saguna). This difference is
immaterial because the basically real unimaginable God was not projected.
Only mediated God was presented by all three, who was the awareness
charged by unimaginable God.
Today, the logical analysis is not only sharp but also steady due to
experimental verification of every concept. The receiving nature of the
people is quite stable due to the scientific analysis. People are not fast in
applying the theoretical tautology1 to arrive at hasty conclusions. In view of
the stability of the phase of intelligence, the projection of the real
unimaginable nature of God will not face the danger of non-existence. The
scientist may not believe any miracle and may say that nothing is
unimaginable2. But, the scientist must accept the unimaginable boundary of
the universe. Even in there, the scientist may argue like this: When the
universe is imaginable, made of imaginable cosmic energy as the
fundamental cause, how can you say that the boundary of the universe is
unimaginable? Just like the ocean is water, the boundary of the ocean must
also be the same water. Hence, the boundary of the imaginable universe
must be also imaginable. This type of argument is not acceptable if you
analyze the subtle point of a boundary. When you reach the edge of the
ocean and stand on it, you must find water on one side and land, which is
not water, on the other side. The knowledge of both water and land is
necessary to fix the boundary of the ocean. Land is not water. If that land
is also water, then the boundary of the ocean is not achieved. Similarly,
when you reach the boundary of the imaginable universe, you must
perceive the imaginable nature of the universe on one side and the
1
Tautology, is using different words to say the same thing even if the repetition does not provide clarity. Tautology also
means a series of self-reinforcing statements that cannot be disproved because the statements depend on the assumption
that they are already correct.
2
The scientist might argue that the so-called unimaginable is only something that is presently unknown. In future, we
can know it. Thus, he might claim that nothing is truly unimaginable.
205
207
65
provided there is some basic credit from your side. Hence, you should
always believe in practical philosophy than continuous begging and
weeping before God through prayers. The practical philosophy can be
according to your level and you need not worry about its magnitude since
God can multiply it to the required extent. But, the extent of practical
philosophy should not be below your capability imagining that God will
multiply to any extent. The realization of all these concepts is called as
jnana yoga or knowledge. The praise of God through prayers without any
aspiration in return is called as bhakti yoga or devotion. The
implementation of the practical sacrifice is called as karma yoga or action,
which alone is the fundamental basis for God to bless you.
In any case, the practical sacrifice should be without any aspiration in
return. Draupadi sacrificed a piece of her valuable sari to bind the wound of
the finger of the Lord without any aspiration in return. Even when she cried
for help, she never thought about it since she did it without any expectation
in return. Practical service to the society without the name of God gives you
temporary heaven. The same service in the name of God brings the grace of
God so that when you are ripened, God comes down in the human form to
receive your service directly. If you servE the humanity in the name of
God, you will render the service to God in human form even if you dont
recognize Him. Serving the humanity removes the inherent repulsion to a
co-human being due to ego and jealousy. Service to all the living beings is
the basis since it is the starting stepping stone by which the service to inert
statues and photos is stopped. Such service to inert objects is waste since
the service is not received by the receiver. However, even such service is
inevitable in the case of beginners, who are unable to eradicate their ego
and jealousy towards living beings and especially to the human form of life.
210
66
asking this point. In the analysis of this point, fortunately, there may be a
possibility for the awareness to become God based on the luck of Advaita
philosophers.
Meaning of Non-inertness
Swami: Often, we use the words in a loose sense and not in the sense
of conclusion after strict analysis. The non-inertness word indicates that it
is different from inert energy and does not mean that there is no similarity
with awareness. If you say that Mumbai is non-Delhi, it does not mean that
there is no similarity between Delhi and Mumbai. In fact, both Delhi and
Mumbai have hundred similarities; only one difference is that Delhi is the
capital of the country, whereas Mumbai is the capital of a state. The
difference is based on single point only and should not be extended to all
other points. You should not say that Delhi is city and Mumbai is cow. You
should not say that Delhi contains houses, whereas Mumbai contains
forests. You should not say that Delhi contains people and Mumbai
contains ants. The word non does not negate all the similarities and
make Delhi and Mumbai totally different from each other. If you analyze
the awareness strictly, every side of the awareness is totally inert.
Awareness means grasping the information of objects from the external
world, storing the information in the brain and creating some new idea. If
you take the first side, the impressions of objects are received through the
senses like receiving the impressions by the camera (eye), tape-recorder
(ear), etc. If the recording of information in the instruments is an inert
mechanism, the same recording of information by the senses should also be
inert.
Nikhil: Today, inert instrumental materials are also employed in the
place of senses by which the recording of information can be carried on in
the usual manner.
Swami: Nikhil acted here as a Madhyamika supporting the Siddhanti
(Swami). Lakshman is the Poorva Pakshi and Phani acted as a Madhyamika
supporting the Poorva Pakshi.
Let us continue with the topic. The other side is the storing of external
information. This is also done in the instruments like a computer and
information is stored in the form of pulses. Science has clearly proved that
the information is also stored in the brain in the same way. In fact, this
point was discovered even by the ancient logic which says that the
information is stored in the form of pulses called sphota. The entire group
of pulses is called as chitta. Hence, this side is also an inert mechanism.
Previously, the computer employed a single microprocessor and it could not
212
recognize the object by one step. It has to recognize the object after noting
the characteristics of the object one-by-one in a sequential chain.
Therefore, the awareness of a human being, which recognizes the object
in one step, was thought to be superior to a computer. But, in course of
time, several microprocessors in a computer, functioning simultaneously
solved this problem and hence, the brain became exactly equal to a
computer. This clearly proves that the receiving and storing of external
information is inert only. The last side of the awareness is creativity. This
can also be proved as an inert mechanism. If the awareness created the idea
of a new animal with eight legs and two tails, it is only a random selection
of a new probability of mixture from already existing components of
information. The tail already exists and the leg also already exists in the
information. The usual mixture is four legs and one tail. Such random
probability makes the computer also to give new ideas and tell poetry.
Nikhil: From the pre-existing knowledge of language, a vocabulary of
words and some rules about rhyme and poetic meter, one can construct new
verses. This is poetic creativity, which essentially is a mere mixing of
existing information and hence, not truly creative. Nowadays, in order to
discover a large number of new molecules for applications in drugs,
computer programs are employed to make a huge number of combinations
of certain known chemical groups in different ways. This field of chemistry
is called combinatorial chemistry. It is an example of how even a computer
can show creativity and it supports the assertion that the so-called
creativity is also an inert function involving new combinations of existing
bits of information.
also the world is real for you. Here, the word Brahman means Karya
Brahman or cosmic energy. The word Brahman is used in several great
items. The Gita says that the Veda is Brahman. Any greatest thing in a
category can be called as Brahman. These Vedic statements mean that you
are cosmic energy and the world is also cosmic energy. The entire world is
only an apparent modification of cosmic energy or Brahman. The apparent
modification is always unreal. The stone is the unreal, apparent
modification of cosmic energy. You are the real cosmic energy. In such a
case, why the unreal stone damages the body of the real soul against its
will? Theoretically, it is true that the stone is unreal and the soul is real.
But, practically, the soul does not control the stone because the stone is not
isolated from its causal energy. When the stone falls on you, it falls along
with its causal energy. This is interaction of two quantities of energy and
not the interaction of unreal stone and the real soul. Due to this practical
difficulty, the Advaita philosopher extracts the true concept by logic from
theory but fails in practice. You are able to lift a small stone and unable to
lift a big stone. Both the stones are real because, they are not isolated from
their causal energies. You are able to lift a smaller stone, which is a smaller
quantity of energy and unable to lift a big stone, which is a larger quantity
of energy. But, Krishna lifted even a huge mountain. Krishna, like any
human being, has the materialized gross body (tamas), the inert energy
associated with it (rajas) and the awareness (sattvam). If these three have
lifted the mountain, everybody should lift the mountain. Apart from these
three, the fourth component, the unimaginable God, exists in Krishna,
which lifted the mountain. The inability of mere awareness to lift the
mountain clearly proves that awareness is not God.
Nikhil: The hitting stone damages the external gross body only and
does not touch the awareness at the energy level.
Swami: The soul is strongly wishing that the stone should not damage
its gross body. This is a practical experience in any case. But, the will of the
soul does not control the stone resulting in the insult of the soul. In such a
case, the soul is proved not to be the controller of the external world. But,
God is the controller of everything. In the same incident, Krishna can
control the stone due to the presence of the unimaginable God in Him. This
clearly differentiates God from the soul.
216
67
217