Assingment 2 Stand - Alone PV System: Renewable Energy Systems 402
Assingment 2 Stand - Alone PV System: Renewable Energy Systems 402
Assingment 2 Stand - Alone PV System: Renewable Energy Systems 402
Assignment 2
ASSINGMENT 2
Stand Alone PV System
REPORTED BY:
SATINDERPAL SINGH (14413919)
1
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
Contents
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 5
1.
1.1.1.
1.1.2.
1.1.3.
1.2.
1.3.
1.3.1.
1.3.2.
1.4.
2.
3.
PV Sizing ................................................................................................................................ 9
1.4.1.
1.4.2.
1.4.3.
1.4.4.
1.5.
Energy output and Load demand over 12 months of the year .............................................. 10
1.6.
1.7.
1.8.
1.9.
Minimum storage require to have discharge rate less than 5 hours ...................................... 13
1.10.
1.11.
1.12.
Battery selection.................................................................................................................... 15
2.2.
2.3.
2.4.
Selecting generator................................................................................................................ 20
3.2.
3.2.1.
4.
Assignment 2
3.2.2.
3.2.3.
References ..................................................................................................................................... 26
Assignment 2
Figure 1: Steady - Power demand over 24 hours for the farm house ........................................ 6
Figure 2: Surge Power required over 24 hours for farm house ............................................................... 6
Figure 3: Insolation at the site during 12 months of the year.................................................................. 8
Figure 4: Connection diagram of the PV .............................................................................................. 10
Figure 5: Inverter energy output and Load demand over the 12 months of the year. ........................... 11
Figure 6: Schematic of standalone hybrid power system...................................................................... 14
Figure 7: EXIDE 8RP670NX Battery bank configuration ................................................................... 16
Figure 8: Victron Energy 24/3000/70 inverter charger for the designed Standalone PV system ......... 18
Figure 9: Morningstar TS45 charge controller used for Stand - alone PV system ............................... 19
Figure 10: ABLE 2500W Petrol Generator for the designed standalone PV system ........................... 20
4
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
INTRODUCTION
Stand alone PV systems are used where grid supply is not available. As compare to grid
connected PV system standalone PV systems are more complex and expensive because of
extra storage batteries required for the system. Although Stand alone PV system are
expensive and complex but they are very useful in the providing energy in remote areas
where grid supply is not available because without grid electricity become more valuable.
The main part of the Stand Alone PV system is PV array, charge controller, Battery bank,
inverter charge and Backup generator. Function of charger controller is to avoid over
charging and controlling the battery voltage. The voltage of the battery determines the system
voltage. Invert charger covert Dc power of battery to Ac power for the load and convert Ac
power from generator to DC power to charge batteries. Backup generator play important role
in providing energy when PV array is unable to meet the load requirement due to bad
insolation from the sun. Figure 6 shows the complete schematic diagram of the hybrid Stand
alone PV system.
The purpose of this assignment is to design the stand alone PV system for the remote area
farm house near Bridgetown, Western Australia. The main objective is to of the design is to
minimize the unit price produced from the system so that it is affordable for the customer.
5
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
1. Preliminary Calculations
1.1.
1600
Power (Watt)
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Hour of the Day
Figure 1: Steady - Power demand over 24 hours for the farm house
From the plot of steady state power in figure 1 the maximum power demand is 1595 Watt at 6
PM.
2500
2250
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Hour of the Day
6
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
From the surge power plot over 24 hours in figure 1 the maximum surge power required is
2250 W at 8 AM.
Load
TV
Steady
state
Power
(active)
(Watt)
15*8
= 120
150
Water Kettle
1000
Washing
Machine
Laptop
250
0.5
20
Refrigerator
300
Lights
Standby
Power
(Watt)
Hours
of
Active
Mode
Active
Mode
Energy
(Wh/day)
120*5
= 600
150*3
= 450
1000*0.25
= 250
250 * 0.5
= 125
20*3
= 60
1300
3
0.25
24
Stand by
Mode
Energy
(Wh/day)
Total Energy
For the
equipment
(Wh/day)
600
4*(24 3)
= 84
450+84 = 534
250
5*(24 05)
= 117.5
3*(24 3)
= 63
125+117.5 =
242.5
60+63 = 123
1300
Total energy requirement of the farm house = 600 + 534 +250 +242.5 + 123 + 1300
= 3049.5 Wh/day
1.2.
Total dc load =
3049.5
.90
= 3388.33 Wh/day
=
7
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
3388.33
24
= 141.18 Ah/day
Assignment 2
1.3.
1.3.1.
Insolation (KWh/m2/day)
2.3
10
11
12
From the figure 3 the worst insolation is during month 6 (June). The insolation during month
6 = 2.3 KWh/m2/day
The peak sun hours per day in month 6 = 2.3 hours/day
8
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
1.4.
Assignment 2
PV Sizing
70.6
9.741
= 7.24
Using 7 parallel string will over slightly under size the PV array.
9
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
PV array output during worst month = IR * Peak-Sun Hours * number of string * mismatch ef
= 4.95 * 2.3 * 7 * 0.93 = 74.116 Ah/day
Battery output = PV array output * Coulomb efficiency
= 74.116 * 0.92 = 68.19 Ah/day
AC power at inverter output = System voltage * Battery output * Inverter efficiency
= 24 * 68.19 * 0.90 = 1472.84 Wh/day
1.5.
Peak sun hours during worst month (month 6) (Pw) = 2.3 Hours
Power at inverter output during worst month (month 6) (PW) = 1472.84 Wh/day
Power in any month N (PN) Peak sun hours in month N (IN)
1472.84
=
2.3
PN = 640.36 * IN Wh/day
N= 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12.
Using above equation power output of the different month of the year can be calculated.
10
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
7.8
6.8
5.5
3.8
2.8
2.3
2.4
3.2
4.2
5.7
7
7.9
Inverter Energy
output
(Wh/day)
4994.85
4354.48
3522.01
2433.39
1793.02
1472.84
1536.88
2049.17
2689.53
3650.08
4482.56
5058.89
Load Demand
(Wh/day)
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
3049.5
Table 2: Power output and Demand during different months of the year
Energy (Wh/day)
5000.00
4000.00
3000.00
2000.00
1000.00
0.00
1
10
11
12
Figure 5: Inverter energy output and Load demand over the 12 months of the year.
The energy generated during some months 10, 11, 12, 1, 2 is more than the energy demand
from the load and there is deficit in the energy during months 4,5,6,7, and 9.
11
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
1.6.
Assignment 2
From table 2 the load demand per month and Output power of the system per month can be
calculated by multiplying Wh/day with the number of days in the month.
Month
Energy
Generated by
the PV system
(KWh/month)
Jan
154.84
Feb
121.93
Mar
109.18
Apr
73.00
May
55.58
June
44.19
July
47.64
Aug
63.52
Sep
80.69
Oct
113.15
Nov
134.48
Dec
156.83
Total Energy (KWh/Year)
Energy demand
of load
(KWh/month)
94.53
85.39
94.53
91.49
94.53
91.49
94.53
94.53
91.49
94.53
91.49
94.53
1113.07
Difference in
the energy
produced and
load demand
(KWh/month)
60.31
36.54
14.65
-18.48
-38.95
-47.30
-46.89
-31.01
-10.80
18.62
42.99
62.29
Load energy
Supplied by
the PV system
(KWh/month)
94.53
85.39
94.53
73
55.58
44.19
47.64
63.52
80.69
94.53
91.49
94.53
919.62
Table 3: Load energy required per month and energy Output per month of the designed PV system
Negative difference in the energy produce and load demand means that there is deficit in the
energy. This deficit can be filled by the stand alone generator.
During the excess energy is wasted during months with positive difference between the
produced energy and load demand because storage unit is only designed to store energy
required for the load.
Annual Energy supplied by the designed PV system = 919.62 KWh/year
Annual energy demand of the load = 1113.07 KWh
919.62
12
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
1.7.
Assignment 2
1.8.
()
(,)
423.54
.8 1
= 529.43 Ah
1.9.
Minimum storage =
1557 5
24 .80
= 414.36 Ah
The total storage capacity of the batter (529.43 Ah) is more than the required minimum
storage (414.36 Ah).
Assignment 2
System voltage = 24 V
Generator Size =
529.43 24
10 0.90
=1411.80 W
From table 3 total annual energy produced by the PV system can be calculated by adding the
generated power of each month generated by designed PV system.
Total energy produced by the PV system = 1155.03 KWh/year
Energy supplied to the load by the PV system = 919.62 Kwh/year
Energy wasted during a year = 1155.03 919.62 = 235.41 KWh/year
Percentage of energy wasted = (235.41/1113.07)*100 = 21.15 %
14
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
2. Selection of Components
2.1.
Battery selection
EXIDE
8RP670NX
Lead - Acid
8V
RAYLITE
MIL 17S
Lead - Acid
6V
670 Ah
600 Ah
1500 Cycles
1500 Cycles
24/8 = 3 Batteries
24/6 = 4 Batteries
$1,420
3 * $1420 = $4,260
$ 1,156.41
4 * $1,156.41 = 4,625.64
Table 4: Comparing two batteries for the selection of required battery for the battery bank
From the table 4, both the batteries compare have enough storage required 529.43 Ah for the
designed system. The number of cycles for the life is same for both EXIDE and RAYLITE
batteries. To meet the system voltage 4 EXIDE batteries are require to be in series to build a
battery bank and if RAYLITE battery is considered then only 3 batteries are need to be in
series for the battery bank.
15
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
From above reason it is clear that both batteries are technically compatible for the battery
bank of the system but the economically there is a significant difference in the cost of both
the batteries. The battery bank of EXIDE 8RP670NX cost $365.64 than the RAYLITE MIL
17S battery bank. As the main objective of the design is to minimize the unit price of energy
produced then EXIDE 8RP670NX is a good option to select for the system.
Selected battery for the Battery Bank = EXIDE 8RP670NX
Number of batteries in series = 3
Number of parallel strings = 1
Total storage of the battery bank = 670 Ah
2.2.
16
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
Victron Energy
24/3000/70
Inverter Characteristic
SMA
SI2224
2200 W
1600 W
19 33V
230 V
50 Hz
6000 W
94 %
Charger Characteristics
187 265 V
24 V
70 A
$2,972.20
16.8 31.5
202 253V
50 Hz
5000 W
93.6 %
172.5 250 V
24 V
80 A
$3,969.45
17
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
Comparing Victor Energy 24/3000/70 and SMA S12224 inverter charger it is clear that both
inverters meet the technical desire requirement. Victron Energy 24/3000/70 inverter has
capacity of delivering steady state power of 2200 W at maximum temperature at the site,
which is oversize than the required 1595 W. The other inverter charger in the comparison
SMA S12224 has a steady state power rating very near to the required value. Both inverter
chargers can easily withstand the peak power due to surge and both have nearly equal
efficiency.
Although Victron Energy 24/300/70 inverter charger is oversized than the required rating but
it is still cheaper than SMA S12224. As we want to keep the cost low as possible it is good
option to select Victron Energy 24/300/70 and it easily meet the technical and safety
requirement of the system and high rating of power for Victron Energy 24/3000/70 allow
space for expansion to supply extra load in future.
Selected Inverter charger = Victron Energy 24/30/70
Figure 8: Victron Energy 24/3000/70 inverter charger for the designed Standalone PV system
2.3.
Assignment 2
Morningstar
TS45
45 A
45 A
Xantrex
C40
40 A
40 A
12 -48 V
12 48 V
125 V
125 V
$257.64
$ 275.62
Two charge controllers are compared in the table 6 for the selection purposes. Both Morning
stat TS45 and Xantrex C40 meet the desired technical requirements of the system. Both
inverters are capable at system voltage of 24 V and both can with stand the maximum solar
input of 36.3 V. Regarding current rating both chargers available in the market are oversize
than required 34.65 A current rating, TS45 have current rating of 45 A and C40 have 40 A
current rating. Technically it is better to select C40 because its current ratings are near to
desired rating.
Above reasons make Xantrex C40 a favourite for the selection but considering the cost of
both of the charger Morningstar TS45 is about $17.98 cheaper than C40. As our main aim of
the design is to keep the price of electricity low the selection of Morning TS45 will more
appropriate.
Selected charger controller = Morningstar TS45
Figure 9: Morningstar TS45 charge controller used for Stand - alone PV system
19
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
2.4.
Assignment 2
Selecting generator
Honda
Dunlite
240 V
2000 W
Unleaded Petrol
$795
Able
Petrol Generator
240 W
25000 W
Unleaded Petrol
$499
Table 7: Comparing two generators for the selection for the standalone PV system
Table 7 shows that both compared generator meet the technical requirements for the system.
Both generators are rated higher than the required 1411.80 W. Honda Dunlite has a rating of
2000W and Able petrol generator have a rating of 2500 W. As both generators are technically
suitable for the system then cost of the generator will determine the selected generator. As
our objective is to design low cost selecting Able petrol generator will be a good choice
because it is $296 cheaper than Honda generator. As the rating of Able generator is higher it
will charger battery soon.
Selected generator = ABLE Petrol Generator
Figure 10: ABLE 2500W Petrol Generator for the designed standalone PV system
20
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
Total dc load =
3049.5
.94
= 3244.15 Wh/day
The total dc load of system has decreased to 3244.15 Wh/day from 3388.33 Wh/day due to
improve in the efficiency of the inverter from 90% to 94%.
New dc load in Ah/day =
3244.15
24
= 135.1729 Ah/day
Energy require from PV each at invert input = Design solar percentage * Total load
= 135.13 * 0.50 = 67.56 Ah/day
67.56
9.741
= 6.93
In the calculations in the part 1 using 7 PV was under size but with the efficiency of victron
inverter efficiency t PVs are perfect number for the system load required to be supplied
during worst moth of insolation.
PV array output during worst month = IR * Peak-Sun Hours * number of string * mismatch ef
= 4.95 * 2.3 * 7 * 0.93 = 74.116 Ah/day
Battery output of chosen EXIDE 8RP670NX = PV array output * Coulomb efficiency
= 74.116 * 0.92 = 68.19 Ah/day
Energy need to be supplied during worst month = 0.5 * Total load per day
= 0.5 * 3049.5 = 1524.75Wh/day
21
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
Battery
Total storage battery required to store 3 days energy (preliminary calculations) = 529.43 Ah
Capacity of selected battery bank = 670 Ah > 529.43
Selected battery bank can store 3 days of load energy and even provide some extra storage to
supply for over load or surge power.
Generator
Power rating of selected Generator = 2500 W
Time to charge selected battery bank =
529.43 24
2500 0.94
= 5.40 Hours
The selected Able petrol generator of 2500 W power rating will charge the selected battery
bank in 5.40 Hours.
22
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
3.2.
Assignment 2
System Costs
PV Array Cost
Estimated cost of PV for per Watt [9] = $4/W
Rating of Schott Poly 180 PV = 180 W
Cost of one PV module = $4/w * 180 W = $720
Number of PV used for standalone system = 7
Total cost of PV array = $720 * 7 = $5040
Capital Cost of the System = $5040 + $4260 + $2972.20 + $257.64 + $499 + $2605.768
= $15634.60
23
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
24
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
Cost of energy =
+ 25
25
$ 15634.60+$9729.06
1113.07
25
= $0.9115/KWh
25
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)
Assignment 2
4. References
[1]
A. Energy. (2011, 26/.8/2012). Raylite Battery 6V 600Ah @ C100. Available:
http://www.apolloenergy.com.au/Renewable-Energy-Components/Raylite/MIL17S
[2]
G. solar. (2011, 26/09/2012). Going solar Lead Acid batteries. Available:
http://www.goingsolar.com.au/pdf/catalogue/GS_11-12_batteries.pdf
[3]
A. Energy. (2011, 27/09/2012). Sunny Island 2200W 24V 80 Inverter Charger.
Available: http://www.apolloenergy.com.au/Renewable-Energy-Components/InverterChargers/SI2224
[4]
A. Energy. (2011, 27/09/2012). Victron 24V 3000W Inverter/Charger. Available:
http://www.apolloenergy.com.au/Renewable-Energy-Components/InverterChargers/MultiPlus-24-3000-70-16
[5]
A. Energy. (2011, 27/09/2012). Morningstar Tristar 45A controller. Available:
http://www.apolloenergy.com.au/Renewable-Energy-Components/Regulators/TS45
[6]
B. Directs. (2012, 27/09/2012). Xantrex C40. Available:
http://www.batteriesdirect.com.au/shop/product/12790/C40.html
[7]
M. 4U. (2012, 27/09/2012). New honda camping genrator for sale - 2.5Kva Dunlite.
Available: http://www.machines4u.com.au/view/advert/2-5Kva-Dunlite/25183/
[8]
Machines4U. (2012, 27/09/2012). New Able camping genrators for sale - PETROL
GENRATOR
Available: http://www.machines4u.com.au/view/advert/PETROL-GENERATOR-2-8KVA240VOLT/30726/
[9]
26
Satinderpal Singh (14413919)