Loneliness Research

Loneliness and International Students:
An Australian Study
Erlenawati Sawir
Simon Marginson
Ana Deumert
Chris Nyland
Gaby Ramia
In a study of international student security, consisting of 200 intensive interviews with
students, resident onshore in Australia, it was found that two thirds of the group had
experienced problems of loneliness and/or isolation, especially in the early months.
According to Weiss, students experience both personal loneliness because of the loss
of contact with families and social loneliness because of the loss of networks. Both
forms of loneliness are at times exacerbated by their experiences in institutional sites.
The article discusses the coping mechanisms that students use. It identifies a third
kind of loneliness experienced by international students, cultural loneliness, triggered
by the absence of the preferred cultural and/or linguistic environment. This can affect
even students with adequate personal and social support. Thus, same-culture networks are often crucial for international students. Yet same-culture networks are not
a universal panacea: They cannot substitute for adequate pastoral care by universities or ensure satisfactory engagement with local cultures, so some causes of cultural
loneliness often remain. The article concludes that the creation of stronger bonds
between international and local students in the educational setting, helping international students to remake their own cultural maps on their own terms, is key to a
forward move on loneliness.
Keywords: international students; social and economic security; loneliness; coping
strategies; networks; cross-cultural relationships
No man is an Iland,
intire of it selfe;
every man is a peece of the Continent,
a part of the maine;
if a Clod bee washed away by the Sea, Europe is the lesse . . .
Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. XX No. X, Season XXXX xx-xx
DOI: 10.1177/1028315307299699
Nuffic
1
Copyright 2007 by Nuffic.
Journal of Studies in International Education
Season XXXX
any mans death diminishes me,

because I am involved in Mankinde;
And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.
John Donne, from Meditation XVII, Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions
(Donne, original English)
INTRODUCTION
Australia educates 9% of the worlds cross-border tertiary students. In 2004,
there were 228,555 international students enrolled in Australian higher education
institutions, three quarters of them onshore in the southern continent. International
students constituted 24.2% of all enrolled students and provided 15% of university
revenues (Department of Employment, Science and Training, 2005; Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2005). These students are
not simply enrollment units administered by universities, nor merely customers of a
large-scale services export industry, nor members of a classroom; they are also
human beings. And they are human beings whose global mobility is associated with
distinctive opportunities and distinctive problems.
In crossing national borders for their education, these students leave their family
and social networks and citizenship rights in the country of origin. As Grinberg and
Grinberg (1989, p. 23) put it, in migration one ceases to belong to the world one left
behind, and does not yet belong to the world in which one has nearly arrived. Newly
arrived international students suddenly find themselves in relational deficit, if not
social isolation, at a time when they need more than the usual support. They face a
foreign language, study in a new setting, finances, accommodation, and day-to-day
living problems, and they must negotiate an unfamiliar set of institutional rules. They
often face issues of personal autonomy (Baker & Siryk, 1986) and the recreation of
identity in the new setting. Often, the physical and cultural environment is very different, with new social customs and norms. International students must establish
themselves as foreigners staying for a time, as neither inside nor outside. They must
deal with unpredictable encounters, idiosyncratic communications, and problems of
racial discrimination, largely on their own (Church, 1982). As this study will illustrate, personal loneliness, both routine and profound, is often endemic to the international student experience.
The main part of the literature on cross-border students is focused on their academic experiences and achievements. A lesser body of research attends to the circumstances of their lives, circumstances that are affected by a number of different
agentsgovernments, educational institutions, civil organizations, family, networks
of friends, and the students themselves. Yet these life circumstances are important
Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students
not only because of the potential to shape the possibilities and limits of academic
learning but also because the day-to-day experiences of international students are
passed along to their family and friends and so enter the formation of country and
institutional reputations within the industry, with the potential to influence market
choices (OECD, 2004). At the same time, and equally important, the human rights
of these cross-border students are being shaped. There is much at stake in international student security and student loneliness.
The Study
The research underlying this article was funded by the Monash Institute for the
Study of Global Movements at Monash University, Australia.1 The first author
(Sawir) interviewed 200 international students from more than 30 different nations,
at nine Australian institutions: the Universities of Melbourne, Ballarat, Sydney, New
South Wales, Deakin, Victoria, and Swinburne, the Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology, and Central Queensland University. The interviews were conducted on
a one-to-one basis in quiet locations for typically 30 to 50 min.
The interviews covered a range of areas touching on the social and economic
security of international studentsfrom finances, accommodation, and work to
languages, networks, and family; to relations with authority; and to intercultural
experiences and personal safety. Summative data from the study were released in
April 2005 (Deumert, Marginson, Nyland, Ramia, & Sawir, 2005a, 2005b).2 This
is the first article focused on a discrete area of inquiry, loneliness, and isolation.
Other articles are being prepared on student work, student finances, language use,
cross-cultural relations, including experiences of racism and discrimination, and
dealing with government and university authorities.
The universities aforementioned cooperated in the selection and self-selection of
student interviewees and provided facilities (normally a room centrally located on
the main campus site) in which the interviews took place. Each vice-chancellor
granted permission for the conduct of the research on the grounds that the interviewees would together constitute a single pool of data that would not be disaggregated
by institution or otherwise used for the purposes of comparing the performance of,
and/or services of, each university to those of the others. In a highly sensitive market, in which comparative judgments have commercial implications, we would not
have been able to gain access to student interviewees within the boundaries of the
normal requirement for permission to research, unless we had given this condition.
Consequently, the researchers did not study closely the particular mix of services
provided by each institution or seek to relate the comments made in interviewees
with the particular circumstances of the universities in question. No doubt this has
led to some underidentification of the universities services, including particular
problems and weakness in those services.
Season XXXX
Typically, universities provide support for international students that is intended to

facilitate an optimal (from the point of view of the universities) academic and social
adjustment. Before the commencement of their studies, international students in
Australia normally attend an orientation program designed to familiarize them with
the various support services and activities, including social and cultural activities, provided within the institution.3 In reporting the results of what is a critical study, it is perhaps necessary4 that we place on record our awareness that much of the assistance
provided by Australian universities, in relation to both the educational program and
their life circumstances, has the potential to modify the incidence of and the experiences of loneliness: For example, the provision of new arrival services and personal
counseling, the structuring of social activities, and the support for student clubs and
other networks. There is no doubt that in many individual cases, this assistance
relieves or reduces experiences of loneliness and/or isolation, and we expect that without such assistance the incidence of loneliness as reported here would be higher, and
many individual experiences more prolonged and deeply felt.
Overall finding concerning loneliness. All 200 student interviewees in the
study were asked the same questions about problems of loneliness and isolation, as
follows:
Q. Have you experienced periods of loneliness or isolation?
[If the answer is yes] Who do you turn to?
A total of 130 students (65%) answered Yes to the first question, 67% of women
and 62% of men. Many expanded on their answers. Some who answered no also
provided further data. Other questions in the study covered related areas including
friendships, networks, and cross-cultural relations.
The article begins by discussing theorizations of loneliness and then discusses
interviewees answers to the questions about loneliness and isolation. The final section discusses the implications for universities and policy makers and for research.
THEORIZATIONS OF LONELINESS
Loneliness is experienced by all human beings at some time in life. It is more
likely to occur under circumstances such as prolonged absence from home or the loss
of a significant other. Feelings of loneliness are like feelings of joy, hunger, and sorrow; they can be managed though never completely prevented (Rokach & Brock,
1998). Like all human experiences, it is never finally known to social science, but
loneliness is open to observation, analysis, and reflexive strategies. The literature on
loneliness is mostly in psychology and sociology. Psychological studies highlight
personality as a predisposing factor. Sociological studies often suggest that loneliness
stem from deficits in social networks. A middle group of studies crosses both disciplinary terrains and takes in both types of explanation.
The Need to Belong

No man is an Iland, intire of it selfe (Donne). In psychology, the need to
belong is defined as the need to maintain a minimum quantity and quality of interpersonal relationships. Conversely, Weiss (1973) conceives loneliness as an absence
of necessary relationships. Following Weiss, De Jong-Gierveld (1987) states that
the lonely person faces an unpleasant or inadmissible lack of required social relationships (also Russell, Cutrona, Rose, & Yurko, 1984, p. 1313). If the need to belong
is not satisfied, negative feelings are generated, including loneliness (Baumeister &
Leary, 1995).
Weiss (1973) distinguishes emotional (i.e., personal) loneliness and social loneliness. Loneliness results from the absence of either intimate personal ties or social
ties and social integration of a less intimate kind. The distinction between personal
loneliness and social loneliness is useful but is not without ambiguities. For example, boyfriend/girlfriend sits on the border between the categories, and certain social
or institutional relationships, such as pastoral care in education, can function as
quasi-parental relationships.
Emotional (personal) loneliness. According to Weiss (1973), emotional loneliness results from the loss of or the lack of a truly intimate tie such as that with a
spouse, lover, parent, or child. It is characterized by anxiety and apprehension.
Emotional loneliness can be remedied by the installment of a satisfactory attachment relationship.
Social loneliness and social networks. Social loneliness is a lack of an engaging
social network with peers who share or partly share ones concerns or view of the
world. Weiss (1973) noted that among other symptoms, social loneliness is characterized by boredom and a sense of exclusion. Osterman (2001, p. 327) remarks
that being accepted, included or welcomed leads to positive emotions such as happiness, elation, commitment and calm. On the other hand, being rejected,
excluded or ignored leads to often intense negative feelings of anxiety, depression,
grief, jealousy and loneliness. The remedy is integration into an existing or newly
formed social network. Weiss states the following:
Social networks provide a base for social activities, for outings and parties and gettogethers with people with whom one has much in common; they provide a pool of
others among whom one can find companions for an evenings conversation or for
some portion of the daily round. Social isolation removes these gratifications; it very
directly impoverishes life. (Weiss, 1973, p. 150)
Season XXXX
Stokes (1985) explores statistically the relationship between social network variables and loneliness among undergraduate students. The social network variables
include network size; network densitythat is, the proportion of possible network
members with whom the student has a connection; the proportions who are confidents and are relatives; and the frequency with which the student receives supportive actions. The variable that correlates most significantly with loneliness is density.
Denser networks enhance the sense of belonging and reduce loneliness.
Green, Richardson, and Schatten-Jones (2001) examine factors affecting both personal and social loneliness using a slightly different set of network variables: size of
network, closeness of members of the network, presence of partner and close (intimate)
others, and network density. They find social loneliness is related to both the closeness
of people in the social network and the number of persons, that is, quality and quantity.
DiTommaso and Spinner (1997) find that integration into a social network is the best
predictor of lower levels of social loneliness. What is crucial is close friends capable of
providing meaningful personal advice rather than casual acquaintances.
Causes of Loneliness
Numerous studies have tackled the causes of loneliness (Lunt, 1991; Peplau &
Perlman, 1982; Rokach, 1988, 1989; Stuewe-Portnoff, 1988). One set of explanations lies in external circumstances, in the fracturing of social networks and personal
relationships. Rokach (1988) refers to traumatic events such as the loss of significant and intimate relationships through death of a spouse, divorce or breakup, or
loss of a friend. Another cause is relocation, which may involve separation not just
from intimate relationships but from most of a persons social networks and support
systems, resulting in relational deficits (Rokach, 1989).
Another set of explanations focuses on personality traits seen to exacerbate the
potential for loneliness. Individuals may be inhibited from creating personal and
social bonds by lack of social skills or communications capacity, physical disability,
feelings of being unimportant, or fear of rejection. People very prone to loneliness
are often shy, introverted, less willing to take social risks, and more anxious,
depressed, and neurotic (Hojat, 1982; Peplau & Perlman, 1982, p. 9; Solano &
Koester, 1989; Stokes, 1985). Language competence is one key factor, and much
research links severe loneliness and low self-esteem (Hojat, 1982; Peplau & Perlman,
1982). According to Nurmi, Toivonen, Salmera-Aro, and Eronen (1997), people with
high self-esteem are more popular than those with low self-esteem, assisting them to
create meaningful relationships. Typically, extroverts are surrounded by large networks to which they feel close (Stokes, 1985). Paradoxically, those who appear more
self-sufficient and less in need of others find it easier to attract others and to maintain
successful relationships with them.
Peplau and Perlman (1982) noted that personal characteristics can contribute to
loneliness by reducing the desire for relationships, by triggering behaviors that
result in unsatisfactory social interactions, and by leading the person to change his
or her social relations. The experience of loneliness can trigger a withdrawal from
social relations in an effort to contain the pain, reinforcing social isolation.
Loneliness and Individual Differences

In contrast, with much of the literature, we suggest that not every lonely person
has the same loneliness. The perception of loneliness, and the way people cope
with it, vary among individuals and between cultural groups: not only by personality
but also because of differing practices in relationships. Between two people in much
the same circumstances, the incidence and intensity of loneliness can vary. In fact,
one may feel lonely and the other not. This potential for variation takes on special
importance in considering international students who come from many different
nationalities, cultural and religious backgrounds, ages, and life circumstances.
Age and loneliness. According to Green et al. (2001), the negative correlation
between loneliness and closeness to members of the network is more significant for
older adults. The negative correlation with the number of contacts is more important
for college students. Similarly, Stokes (1985) finds that the loneliness of college students can be addressed simply by increasing the size of their networks. We note that
this finding may be culturally specific; for example, young people in some cultures
may have greater need for close personal relationships than those from other cultures.
Gender and loneliness. There are contradictory findings regarding gender and
loneliness. Weiss (1973) states that women are more apt to be lonely than men.
Women are said to have lower self-esteem (Hojat, 1982), which given the association
between loneliness and low self-esteem means they are more prone to loneliness. But
Russell, Peplau, and Cutrona (1980) find no gender differences in relation to loneliness, and Borys and Perlman (1985) argue that reported gender differences in loneliness result from mens greater reluctance to disclose (and perhaps to acknowledge
to themselves) socially undesirable feelings. Some also argue that women place a
higher importance than men on relationships and are more strongly affected by deficiencies in them. Others findings are different again. Deniz (2005) concludes that
loneliness levels are higher among male than female students, also confirmed by Ari
and Hamarta (2000), because female students have better attachment skills, especially in forming and maintaining close dyadic social ties (Nurmi et al., 1997). Such
gender differences might be themselves be subject to cultural differences.
Cultural factors and loneliness. Some sociological studies note that loneliness
can be exacerbated by cultural values and norms relating to coupling and other
aspects of relationships (Rokach, 1989). But there is a paucity of studies of cultural
and cross-cultural aspects in relation to loneliness. Most studies focus on loneliness
Season XXXX
in just one culture (Misra, 1999). This article makes a distinctive contribution in
this area.
In the absence of multicultural studies, we depend on the larger field of research
on cultural differences. Among Hofstedes (1998) five dimensions of variation in
national cultures5 is individualism/collectivism. Individualism versus collectivism
refers to variations in the degree to which individuals are integrated into groups. In
collectivist cultures, the basic survival unit is the group (Hui, 1988), often constituted by an extended family including uncles, aunts, and grandparents, offering
protection in exchange for unquestioning loyalty (Hofstede, 1998). Group members place a high value on close and supportive networks (Gudykunst, Nishida, &
Schmidt, 1989) and actively share the lives of others in the group. Mutual support
is important, particularly during unpleasant events (Triandis, Bontempo, Villareal,
Asai, & Lucca, 1988). Friendships in collectivist society are nonspecific and predetermined by stable social relationships (Hui, 1988). Triandis (1989) notes that
desires to remain with parents and extended family are stronger in collectivist than
individualist cultures. Correspondingly, collectivists will tend to suffer more
deeply the absence of such relationships.
People from individualist cultures exhibit fewer skills of close interaction and
are more emotionally detached, believing they can stand on their own (Hui, 1988).
The more individualistic a culture is, the more likely it is that a person blames themselves for their loneliness. Furthermore, social support network are likely to be weaker
than in collectivist cultures . . . the degree of individualism mediates how satisfied one
is with the situation, which in turn will influence how one responds and copes with it.
(Misra, 1999, Individualism and Loneliness, para. 2)
Coping With Loneliness

The strategies and resources people use in coping with loneliness, which vary
among individuals and among cultural groups, are the object of much research
(Cutrona, 1982; Paloutzian & Ellison, 1982; Rokach, 1990; Rokach & Brock, 1998;
Rubenstein & Shaver, 1982). We can identify three overlapping kinds of coping strategies: (a) strategies in which the lonely student works directly on himself or herself to
self-manage loneliness; (b) strategies designed to augment social relationships or the
capacity to engage in them; (c) strategies of seeking help, often of a professional or
institutional kind, which can lead to either objective.
Andre (1991) refers to reflexive strategies of managing being alone as positive
solitude. Rokach and Brock (1998, p. 112) talk about promoting individuality,
creativity, and self-awareness by allowing the opportunity for contemplation, selfexploration, and insight. These moves can enhance self-esteem and help in coping
with the pain of loneliness. On the other hand, some distance themselves further,
retreating into a closed inner self; this is sometimes associated with pathological
behavioral toward self or others. More proactive strategies are to enter activities
that provide adventure or other challenges or to pamper oneself via consumption.
Another strategy is connecting to religion and faith, gaining strength and inner
peace (Rokach & Brock, 1998). Kirkpatrick and Shaver (1992) find that among participants who believed in God, those describing their relationship with God as a secure
attachment are less lonely and depressed than those for whom it is insecure.
Pergament (1990) suggests that God can be viewed as another member of the social
network who, like other network members, can help in coping. Religious life also provides community and a sense of belongingness. Religion is one of a number of ways
of promoting and augmenting social networks. The classic advice to lonely students
is to search out a collaborative activity such as sport, or activity or service-oriented
clubs and other associations of peers.
International Students and Loneliness

What does the research tell us about the loneliness of international students? Like
other temporary or permanent migrants, international students experience both personal and social loneliness. Many report a profound sense of loss and isolation, as
well as anxiety, confusion, and disappointed expectations (Brislin & Yoshida, 1994).
Early feelings of loneliness are intense even for students in regular contact with people from their own city or culture. In most cases, this intensity diminishes in time, as
students expectations and patterns of life change and as they learn to cope to extend
their social circles and make new kinds of friends. If this transformation does not
occur, the intense loneliness becomes emotionally entrenched as social alienation
(Moroi, 1986). This can become extremely debilitating and related to a loss of motivation, resulting in academic attrition (Brennan, 1982, p. 271). Demir and Tarhan
(2001, p. 113) find, in relation to adolescent students in Turkey, as the level of loneliness increased, academic achievement decreased. This finding is consistent with
those of Brennan (1982) and Dobson, Campbell, and Dobson (1987). On the other
hand, students with strong support networks exhibit better psychological and physiological well-being, particularly during periods of high stress (Sarason, Sarason, &
Gurung, 1997). Good networks help students to feel supported and more in control.
The literature also reveals patterns in the type of support used by students when
coping with emotional, social, and educational problems. When seeking help with
emotionalsocial problems, students opt for parents, older friends, or other students;
when seeking help with educationalvocational problems, they opt for faculty advisers, parents, or older friends (Leong & Sedlacek, 1986). Baloglu (2000) noted that
friends are the most preferred source of help for international students, followed by
parents and teachers; friendship networks provide the most important support systems. Studies find that student counseling services are underutilized (Baloglu, 2000;
Jacob, 2001; Mori, 2000; Schweitzer, 1996; Snider, 2001) because of insufficient
funding to support a counseling service adequate to international students needs, or
10
Season XXXX
unawareness of its existence, or concerns about trustfulness, problems of shame and

loss of face, and other cultural issues.
Cultural factors affect international student loneliness in two distinct ways. First,
many students find themselves missing their own cultural and linguistic setting, often
intensely. This is an extreme version of social loneliness as defined by Weiss (1973): loss
of contact with those who share ones concerns or view of the world. Second, many find
themselves in cross-cultural relationships but at a lower level of empathy than sameculture relationships. Research in the English-language countries finds that many international students are disappointed by the underdevelopment of relationships with local
students (e.g., in the United States: Lee, Maldonado-Maldonado, & Rhoades, 2006).
Mobility also creates new possibilities. Lonely international students can also
have advantages. Many, though not all, are free of career and child-rearing responsibilities. The student world is open, fluid, flexible, and cosmopolitan; its freedoms are
alarming and attractive. Losing networks provides opportunities (as well as pressures) to enter new associations. Through their studies, and often their residence, they
are in regular seeing distance of many other students and have broad opportunities
for extracurricular activity and the installing of attachment relationships. If network density is a key factor in reducing loneliness, then students can quickly multiply their friendships. Against this, new relationships take time and effort, and in the
early months, most international students are hard-pressed just to manage their
course load and cope with basic communications. Many also work to cover the costs
of study and living (Deumert et al., 2005a). Furthermore, simply expanding the density of networks may not be enough for those students whose deeper requirement is
not for quantity but for quality of association, through intimacy and/or cultural fit in
relationships. Intercultural and linguistic differences can be steep barriers to climb.
Institutional sites of loneliness. Weiss (1973) distinction between emotional (personal) and social loneliness originates in two kinds of human relationship: in families and in social networks. These are not the only social sites in which people feel
lonely. This study finds that international students are also affected by institutional
relationships, including the exchange in classrooms, studentteacher relations, relations with university administrations, relations with government and other authorities. In institutional relationships, a sense of social and cultural embeddedness, of
individual fit with the setting, is important. Some international students have a
heightened sense of loneliness in institutional settings, especially when they are in
difficulty, exacerbating personal or social loneliness. It can be worst for students who
look to administrative or pedagogical relationships to fill the gaps in their personal or
social relationships.
The article will now consider the findings from the 200 student interviews.

Table 1
11
Self-Reported Problems With Loneliness, by National Origin

and Gender
Total
Women
Women
With
Problems
Nation
Southeast
Asia/Pacific
Indonesia
Malaysia
Singapore
Laos, Cambodia,
and Vietnam
Other SE Asia
and Pacifica
Northeast Asia
China
Hong Kong
Other East Asiab
South Asia
India
Other South Asia
Others
Middle East/
North Africa
Other Africa
Europe
Canada/U.S./U.K.
Latin America
Total
Total
Men
Men
With
Problems
Total
People
People
With
Problems
22
13
7
12
11
7
54
85
100
27
5
4
18
2
4
67
40
100
49
18
11
30
13
11
61
72
100
33
67
50
80
100
83
22
5
3
13
3
3
59
60
100
6
0
6
4
0
4
67
0
67
28
5
9
17
3
7
61
60
78
4
5
2
3
50
60
17
14
10
7
59
50
21
19
12
10
57
53
2
3
2
3
2
101
2
3
2
0
2
68
100
100
100
0
100
67
5
4
4
2
1
99
3
3
1
2
1
62
60
75
25
100
100
62
7
7
6
5
3
200
5
6
3
2
3
130
71
86
50
40
100
65
a. Brunei,Thailand, and Papua New Guinea.

b. Korea, Japan,Taiwan, and Macau.
Q. HAVE YOU EXPERIENCED A PERIOD

OF LONELINESS OR ISOLATION?
As noted in the Introduction, of the 200 students interviewed, 130 (65%) stated
that yes, they had experienced loneliness or isolation in Australia. Whether due to a
higher propensity to loneliness or to report it, the proportion among women students
(67%) was slightly higher than among men (62%), as Table 1 shows.
Of the larger national student groupings, those with aforementioned average
rates of loneliness were Malaysia (72%), Singapore (100%), and the small group
from Other Africa (86%). We might expect that the highest incidence of loneliness
would be among students from small national populations in Australia, but the
12
Season XXXX
cases of students from Malaysia and Singapore conflict with this assumption. Data
from the present study do not allow us to take further the potential differences
between nations, in both the incidence of loneliness and the coping strategies used
by students and other agencies to overcome loneliness and isolation. This is an
interesting topic and worthy of further research (see Further Research).
As Table 1 shows, most students were from Asian nations, traditionally associated
with collectivist cultures. This does not mean that every person from those nations
shared the same outlook; some traces of individualist values were evident in interviews. However, the collectivist aspect does affect the responses and is referred to
several times in the data that follow.
Studentsnetworks. Other data from the 200 interviews allow us to summarize students relationships and networks, comparing those who reported feelings of loneliness and isolation with those who did not. We might intuit that those reporting
loneliness would be more likely to lack social networks. It is interesting to find that,
as Table 2 shows, on the whole, those who reported loneliness or isolation had a
higher incidence of networked relationships than those who did not. More of those
reporting loneliness (60%) than those who did not report loneliness (51%) had close
friends in Australia. More of those reporting loneliness had casual friendships with
other international students (100%, compared with 76% among those not reporting
loneliness) and casual friendships with local students (60%/51%) and also reported
involvement in social organizations (56%/34%). The one exception to these patterns
was that those reporting loneliness were less likely to have family or relatives close
by, 28% as compared to 35%. In a sample of 200 students, these patterns are not conclusive, but they do suggest that there is not a simple correlation between loneliness
and isolation. Networks do not necessarily eliminate loneliness. The absence of networks does not necessarily lead to loneliness. The majority enjoy networks, but the
majority experience loneliness. Networks are desirable, but they are not a universal
panacea for loneliness.
Perhaps one reason for these patterns is that the group of those who say that they
are not lonely includes both those enjoying an active life among friends and associates and those who have come to terms with a degree of isolation or actually prefer
it (see below). Second, it is not just the quantity of networked relationships that is
important but the quality, including their cultural content. An international student
might enjoy a broad pattern of networked relationships while still missing her or his
familiar cultural setting and still face barriers and difficulties, such as communication problems. It is significant that 65% of those who had experienced loneliness or
isolation had faced barriers in making friends across cultures, compared to 36% of
the nonlonely. This might be one of the keys to unlocking the problem of loneliness
and isolation, especially in the early months.

Table 2
13
Composition of Students Networks in Australia

Lonely, N = 130
Networks and Associations Include
Number
Not Lonely, N = 70
Number
Immediate family/relatives
37
28
25
35
Close friends including boyfriends/girlfriends
79
60
36
51
Casual friends: other international students
131
100
54
76
Casual friends: local students
79
60
36
51
Social organizations
74
56
24
34
Yes
85
65
25
36
No
45
34
45
63
Q. Are there significant barriers in making

friends across cultures?
Note: Some students mentioned more than one association, so the total does not sum to 100%.
The Yes Response (Those Experiencing Loneliness/Isolation)

First experiences: We are in the very strange place. In the early months, when
the separation from family is raw and social networks in Australia are embryonic
or nonexistent, many students have the sense of being lost in a jungle: a profound
unfamiliarity extending from culture, language, and people to urban looks and
smells, and strange administrative systems. Everything is new. Students are constantly uncertain about what to do and the resources able to help.
Yes definitely. . . . I didnt know that ISS (International Student Service) actually handles these matters. If I knew, I would have talked to people. The first three months
were really hard. Id walk around and say, awww . . . God, I feel so lonely. I cant
hang around . . . I want to go home. I would usually call my friends or my parents
back home. I spent a lot of money calling my friends. (male, 28, biochemistry,
Indonesia)
Oh yes, even though I came with my family, the first year here was terrible. It took
me very long to adapt. Maybe its a new environment plus new faces, everything new.
(female, 32, commerce, Singapore)
To compound the personal deficit and social deficit, many students experience
a culture deficit. Some feel that their identities are continually being bombarded.
Yes. The first time I came here my family was still in Indonesia. We were still struggling to find house, nobody to help us. I feel at the time, apart from the family, we are
in a very strange place, different culture; it was difficult to find help. All things make
you very, very, strange at the time. (male, 31, community development, Indonesia)
14
Table 3
Season XXXX
Triggers of Loneliness, Interviews With 200 International Students,

Australia 2003-2004
Total students interviewed = 200

Number of students answering yes to the question Have you experienced a period of
loneliness or isolation in Australia? = 130 (65%)
Number of Lonely Students
Who Mentioned
This Trigger
% of the
Students
Interviewed
[No trigger(s) of loneliness specified]a
62
47
Personal (emotional) loneliness
46
35
Shock of the new culture
30
23
Triggers of Loneliness
Nominated by Interviewees
Obstacles to social networking
Difficulties in handling problemsb
Personal characteristics of interviewee

Total students answering yes
130
100
Note: Some students mentioned more than one cause of loneliness, so percentages do not sum to 100.
a.The students were not specifically asked to identify the triggers of loneliness, but a majority of them
provided sufficient data to allow the researchers to identify causes. No doubt, of the 47% that did not
specify a trigger, many of them would have specified a trigger or triggers if they had been asked.
b. All but one of the specified problems were academic in nature.
The initial loneliness is deepened when students face settlement problems, such
as prolonged difficulties in finding private rental accommodation, or have early bad
experiences, such as this student who was robbed:
When I came here just three weeks I met a very big problem. At the time I lived with
my home stay and her house was broken by someone. I lost my laptop, cash, and
mobile. At that time I was very distressed. . . . I lost my passport, and I had to go to
the Chinese Embassy to apply for a new one. . . . I had to do many things by myself.
At the time I feel very lonely. I wanted to go back home as soon as possible. I didnt
want to live in Australia anymore. (female, 23, international business, China)
Causes of Loneliness
The students were not specifically asked to identify the causes of their loneliness, but the majority of them provided sufficient data in their replies to allow the
researchers to identify causes. Among the students who specified causes, the main
causes were the absence of intimate persons and lack of cultural fit. A smaller number referred to difficulties in securing social networks (Table 3).
Personal loneliness: Dad I wanna go home. The childparent bond is the
strongest human bond in a collectivist culture (Triandis, 1989, p. 75). The loss of
15
close family (parents, spouses, children, and siblings), relatives, and friends affects
students to varying degrees. Some find it very painful:
Yes, yes, oh, especially right at the beginning when I first got here. I didnt have anyone to talk to, that was the thing. It was really hard because I couldnt have contact
with anybody. Initially I came all by myself. . . . Exactly who to approach, who to talk
to, I had no clue. So I used to be on the phone everyday with my Dad, I wanna go
home. Its like every single day, Ill call my Dad and cry and cry on the phone . . . at
the beginning, no, I didnt know or didnt have someone to go to, so there was a lot
of loneliness and things like that. (female, 28, business, Zimbabwe)
The experience is more daunting for students who had left the nest for the first
time. Students also miss their families more than usual when they fall ill and also
at special family times such as Christmas.
When I first came here its very lonely because its my first experience of going into
abroad and staying alone . . . and you know I got a small baby just 10 months old.
This is very hard for me. (male, 35, law, Indonesia)
Social loneliness and networking: She doesnt always understand. Many interviewees wanted to connect to people like themselves but found obstacles to social
networking, such as incompatibilities of age or nationality and problems of language
and communication. Others mentioned financial constraints to socializing and difficulties in breaking into other peoples busy lives.
Not isolation, its just lonely. Even though my sister has come, I still feel that. When
I talk to her she doesnt always understand what Im talking about because shes too
young. Although shes around 18, we still have a generation gap. (female, 21, design,
Hong Kong)
In fact its hard because you come from different countries. If you have a lot of friends,
so much less you have loneliness in this country. (male, 31, computing, China)
Personal characteristics: I always feel like that. A few students ascribed their
loneliness to their personal psychology. (Perhaps the fact that only a few linked their
loneliness to their personal attributes is a sign that most interviewees were from collectivist cultures.) Some turned their relational deficit into positive solitude.
They liked being alone, or at least they accepted it. For others, their misery was
compounded by a sense of personal inadequacy.
Yah, sometimes, maybe just because of my character. I always feel like that back
home. It doesnt make any difference. (female, 24, international business, Indonesia)
Loneliness in institutional settings: If I knew that I would be so isolated, maybe

I would not have come. After initial settlement, several students mentioned feelings
16
Season XXXX
of loneliness arising in their academic work and institutional relationships, sometimes triggered by those relationships. This was difficult when the students
expected those relationships to be socially supportive and found that they were not
and for those lacking personal and social backup when faced by educational or
administrative difficulties.
When I moved to [name of university]. I was quite unhappy about my course. I was
depressed. A lot of things had been building and I was getting really depressed and
lonely and I felt like I was just alone and fighting this whole battle. (male, 26, business, Botswana)
Yes. . . . Sometimes in the school I feel lonely. Most people are Australians, and all
are busy. They cant find time just say how are you or something like that. (male, 31,
biology, Egypt)
One student assumed the PhD program would involve an active research culture.
But it did not happen.
If I knew that I would be so isolated doing my PhD here, maybe I would not have come
here. I chose to come to another country because I thought I would have more chance to
attend conferences, express my ideas, take part in discussion groups. But when I came
here I realized that I make a mistake. (female, 31, community development, Indonesia)
Without classes, PhD students lack the surrogate social network and the opportunities for genuine friendship that these provide. A degree of loneliness is inherent and can only be overcome if the university provides structured groupings.
Loneliness in my research . . . its a different type of loneliness, lets say topic-related
loneliness. I cant talk to anybody, not even to my supervisor, because its a field no one
really has worked in. I guess you dont go out and say look I am lonely can I talk to you,
rather you search for company and then you talk. (male, 40, education, Germany)
Others have negative experiences in dealing with authorities and no one to share
these with.
Yes. . . . Not often at university, but within university life, especially when I have to
deal with immigration. Because there is no one to ask (for help). The International
Students office or School of Graduate Studies always refers you back to the
Immigration office, and when you have to deal with Immigration Office yourself, you
feel like you are just a piece of paper. (female, 29, architecture, Indonesia)
Q. Who Do You Turn to in the Face of Loneliness?

Most students (88%) who felt lonely or isolated turned to personal or social networks. A smaller group (10%) became immersed in activities, and 15% drew on
personal resources. Some had more than one strategy (Table 4). The categories of

Table 4
17
Copying Strategies of Lonely International Students
Total students = 200

Number of students answering yes to the question Have you experienced a period of
loneliness or isolation in Australia? = 130 (65%)
Responses to the follow-up question Who did you turn to?
Total
13
10
I turn to relationships in Australia

Family and relatives
Spouse, siblings, other relatives

Boyfriend/girlfriend
Subtotal
15
11
Subtotal
71
54
Supervisor/lecturer
International office
University counseling
11
Friends
University staff
Subtotal
Landlord
Subtotal
Total
98
75
Family and relatives
Subtotal
45
34
Friends
Subtotal
12
Total
57
44
I turn to relationships in my
home country
I use other coping strategies

Engage in an activity
13
10
Keep solitary
20
15
130
100
Grand total all responses
Note: Some students used more than one strategy, so the total does not sum to 100%. Note that there
is some ambiguity between the categories personal relationships and social networks. For example,
close boyfriends/girlfriends can fall into either category.
support cited most often were friends in Australia (54% of the 130 lonely students
mentioned this) and family and relatives back home (34%). For many of these temporary migrants, the link back to home remains very significant. Many international
students in effect live in two different places. Institutional relationships, much less
important in coping with loneliness (8%), divided evenly between academic staff
and staff in student services.
Sources of Support
Personal support: You just call home. Those who did not have the comfort of
parents, partners, siblings, or other relatives in Australia often called home, though
this was cheaper for some than others.
18
Table 5
China
Indonesia
Philippines
Vietnam
Thailand
Korea
Malaysia
Singapore
Season XXXX
Penetration of Information and Communication Technologies in

Selected Asian Nations
All Phone Subscribers
Per 1,000 Population
Internet Use
Broadband Penetration
499
184
446
131
537
1,303
766
1,350
73
52
58
71
112
656
392
559
17
0.3
0.3
n.a.
0.2
248
10
118
Source:World Bank (2006).

n.a. = Data not available from source.
Everybodys busy with their own life so you feel very, very lonely. You just call home.
(male, 24, computing, India)
I mean there are some things that I would confide to friends here, but . . . I often call
home, not only to my parents but often to close friends from home. It is cheap to call
back to the US. (male, 24, international business, US)
It was noticeable that the interviewees were much more likely to refer to telephone communication (especially in relation to contact with parents) than the use of
other communications technologies. There were some references to e-mail but none
to more advanced technologies such as Voice over IP, chat programs with video connections, and so on. There were also few references to accessing home radio and TV
through satellite or the Internet. Here an inhibiting factor was the relatively weak
penetration of information and communication technologies in many of the Asian
nations that provide international students in Australia (Table 5).
Some students found that although calling home in itself was easy to do, securing an emotional consensus and a shared approach to the loneliness problem was
more difficult.
I dont want them to worry so much about me. I just stay in my room . . . sometimes
I cry (out) and when I cry out, I feel better. (male, 21, business, Malaysia)
I never spoke to anyone. I never even told my parents about it, because theyll be
extremely worried now that I am staying so far away. (female, 25, media and communication, India)
Social networks: I felt better speaking the same language. Many students
found that speaking their own language made them feel better.
19
I talked to other Indonesian community (members) here, some friends. I felt better
speaking the same language. (male, 41, literacy, Indonesia)
But often the capacity of friends to provide social support is not unlimited.
I used to talk to a friend of mine, Im pretty close to her, but maybe shes not a good
listener. Then she wouldnt answer my phone call. (female, 26, computing, Russia)
Yes, yes. I was with my boyfriend at that time, but he couldnt help. I guess we both
had the same problem and we kind of lost the ability to help each other. But you dont
find him as someone you can talk to and help you. . . .I guess other people very probably (could) be a support but he just couldnt. He showed very clearly his selfishness
in this very difficult situation. (female, 25, public health, China)
University services: Ive been happy ever since. One reason why few students
drew on the support of university staff was that not all knew the services that were
available, especially early in their stay.
We didnt have someone to talk to at that time. We didnt have any idea how the service work at the unit. (male, 31, community development, Indonesia)
For some, university services are an auxiliary to other supports. For others, they
are the factor that makes the difference.
I dont mind seeing the counseling people if I have a problem. At that time I didnt
really have some one who was really close to me, and I dont like talking about my
personal problems. So I went to the counseling service. (female, 27, engineering,
Indonesia)
Being the first child in my family, I was never one to talk about my problems and a
lot of things had been building. I was getting really depressed and lonely, and I felt
like I was just alone and fighting this whole battle. So I talked to this friend of mine,
and then after that, I went to the counseling service and I talked to them. And then I
thought, I need a change. So I changed my course, and I changed towns and Ive been
happy ever since. (male, 26, business, Botswana)
Positive solitude: I can manage this. A number of students just coped on their
own. Going into crowded places could help them forget their loneliness or they
found it natural to keep things inside. Gender also affected it. Some male students
saw coping in solitude as intrinsic to being a man, but no women saw it as essentially female.
I think Im older, I can manage this. (male, 25, computing, China)
Because I am a man, I usually keep (my loneliness) to myself. If it gets bad, I usually
talk with my friends, my close friends. (male, 28, business, Indonesia)
20
Season XXXX
All the time. A lot of times, but . . . largely Im an insecure person anyway. I think most
females are, and I think everyone can say theyve experienced periods of loneliness.
(female, 26, medicine, Malaysia)
For one student, religious activity strengthened his sense of himself.

I talked to my family, I called them. Or read Quran. (male, 37, accounting, Egypt)
The No Response (Not Experiencing

Loneliness/Isolation)
A number of the students who said that they had never experienced loneliness
or isolation went on to explain their answer.
Starting off well: I was so eager to explore the new world. Of the students who
do not experience loneliness, many start very well. They are used to traveling, or
being alone, or they are excited by the new personal freedoms. Typically, for these
students in the study, cultural tensions were minimized or the cultural difference
emerged as positive:
No. Because when I first came here, I was so eager to explore the new world, yeah.
(male, 22, food science, Vietnam)
No loneliness, never. I love it here. Im comfortable. You see the thing is, I fit in over
here. I dont fit in, in India. Im a feminist, ok, Im a strong minded woman and in the
India subcontinent, it is very difficult. Here I have the freedom to lead my own life
and I am not expected to come home and . . . I dont have all the social pressures to
deal with. I have my life. (female, 19, arts, India)
No personal loneliness: I have family here. Some avoid loneliness because

they have family with them.
No. I came here with my siblings and settled in and made friends in the language
school. (male, 21, engineering, Indonesia)
Good social networks: I was lucky to be in a college environment. Others like

students in residence find ready-made social networks at hand or link up with other
students from their own country.
There are a lot of Chinese students here; you can easily find friends. (female, 24,
industrial relations, China)
The great thing about staying at college is that you dont get lonely, because your
friends are always around. Yeah, boys and girls. (male, 20, business, Malaysia)
21
I think I was lucky to be in a college environment, because Im not the only one who
is new and lonely. There are other people out there, so I think when you are faced with
that, there are always two things you can do. You can hide in your room and cry alone,
or you can go out and meet people and talk to them, and say hey, hello, how are
you. . . and then you say Im sad and lonely, and they say hey Im sad and lonely
too, lets talk, okay. That is how I developed one of my closest friendships here. A
Pakistani friend, totally from the other side of the world. Id never really heard of
Pakistan, hes Muslim and but we became really good friends and within a year we
were the best of friends. (male, 24, arts, Singapore)
Personal characteristics: Ive always been busy. Some explained the absence
of loneliness by saying that they were extroverted or had learned to be independent
or were just too busy to think about it.
Ive always been busy, so I havent noticed to tell you the truth. The first year I came
here I spent my first semester just doing my masters. I just worked hard, so it kept
me busy. Then the next six months I engaged in being President (of the postgraduate
student association). And that was that, my agenda filled up automatically. (male, 33,
medicine, Spain)
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

I think the biggest problems most international students face is that of loneliness, and
I mean it really gets to the point of depression. Some of the people I know that Ive
met, its really . . . they dont know what to do, they dont know who to go to, because
they have come from countries where it is not acceptable to go and ask for help, you
have to do it yourself. (male, 29, economics, India)
These results confirm the studies of international students summarized by

Poyrazli, Arbona, Bullington, and Pisecco (2001), concerning the effects of losing
family support, the role of social networks, and how unfamiliar cultural and linguistic settings exacerbate loneliness. Students who feel isolated tend to be less
confident than their peers:
An individuals self-concept and self-esteem are validated by significant others who,
in culturally designed ways, provide emotional and social support. Moving to a different culture suddenly deprives the individual of this support system . . . anxiety is a
normal response in these situations and that it may range from minor annoyance to
extreme pain . . . because they are in a new country facing an unfamiliar language and
culture, international students are likely to experience a more difficult college transition than U.S. students and might also have a more difficult time seeking appropriate
assistance. (Poyrazli et al., 2001, pp. 54-55)
This study also draws attention to certain issues underplayed in the literature,
especially institutional relationships and some cross-cultural aspects of loneliness.
22
Season XXXX
Ambiguities of Networks
Among temporary cross-border migrants, the configuration of personal and social
relationships can be unstable and volatile, especially early, as sojourners struggle to
fill the gaps in their lives. As noted, from time to time, institutional settings may take
on quasi-personal or quasi-social roles. Conversely, institutions sometimes expect
that personal and family networks routinely take responsibility for student surveillance and pastoral care, including matters that might be seen to be in the domain of
responsibility of the institution itself.
Here we will provide one example of the latter point, originating from outside
the research for this study but illustrative of the theme of isolation and of what is
at stake in assumptions about the role of informal networks.
On January 12, 2005, police in Australias capital city of Canberra discovered the
badly decomposed body of a 25-year-old Chinese student, Hong Jie Zhang (Steffi),
who had been an international student at the nearby University of Canberra. Her body
was in the flat for seven months before her death was discovered (Wikipedia, 2005).
Any mans death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankinde, as Donne so
powerfully stated the case for universal humanism and care. In principle, no
Australian university would disagree. Given the legal framework governing international education in Australia, the extent of the Universitys responsibility for crisis
management and final care might be contested, but its responsibility for ensuring
that enrolled students attend the institution is clear-cut.
Yet when The Australian newspaper interviewed the vice-chancellor of the
University of Canberra, Professor Roger Dean, he was cautious in response to questions about whether the university should shoulder any responsibility for the failure
to notice Hongs absence. He cited the failure of social networks. The idea that
nobody would have noticed her missing from that peer group or from the flat for so
long is quite amazing and very worrying, he said (Illing, 2005).
It was assumed that Hongs social networks would fill any gap in university administration and pastoral care. But how well grounded was that assumption? The notion
that institutional networks should provide a social ambience and support and the
obverse notion that the responsibilities of social networks extend across the responsibilities of the institution both underline the ambiguous roles of social networks. Both
assumptions are also problematic. Some students want the university to assume a
larger social responsibility than it can effectively carry out. In relation to the aftermath
of Hongs tragic death, the chief officer of the University of Canberra wanted to shed
part of the core responsibilities of the universityby passing them to the uncertain
management of personal and social networks, despite the potential lacunae.
It is true that people with strong support networks tend to exhibit better wellbeing and capacity to handle stress, as indicated by Sarason et al. (1997) and others.
This study has found that most students prefer to seek support from friends rather
than rely on the institutional support of the university, confirming Baloglu (2000).
23
In the first instance, this mostly means same-culture networks, which is what the
vice-chancellor is referring to. Nevertheless, although such networks are crucial and
must be supported and although they appeal to universities as being both cheap and
culturally sensitive, they should not be seen as the repository for the universitys
own responsibilities. Social networks are voluntary and therefore erratic; they are
incomplete and uneven in their coverage. They cannot provide every student with
the necessary empathy, trust, and practical assistance.
Furthermore, transferring the pastoral burden to same-culture networks is a lazy
strategy that allows the institution to go on without changing itself. At worst, operating on their own without strong international student engagement in local institutions, activities, and networks, same-culture networks function as ghettos that
block the potential for a richer educational, social, and cultural experience.
Implications for university services. One set of implications is that friendly classrooms, competent administration, and sensitive student services are more significant
for international students than for domestic students. It is essential that universities
resource student servicing and classroom strategies adequate to help students with
personal and social loneliness, especially in the early stages. In the absence of a formal regime of pastoral care as in New Zealand (Lewis, 2005), students rely on universities to do so voluntarily. Furthermore, in many cases, students should be better
informed about the services already available to them, from the very beginning of
their sojourn.
First, among these university services, none is more important than assistance with
learning English, a vital ongoing condition of survival and academic success. Second,
students should be supported in their personal and social relationships and in maintaining continuing contact with family and friends back home and developing social
networks. Universities should promote mechanisms that trigger networking, such as
student clubs and buddy systems. Another strategy of local bridging lies in forming
relations with same-culture people outside the universities. In the present study, one
interviewee suggested that universities might ask people living in the city of study, of
the same national origin as the students, to meet with the students when they arrive
and play an ongoing nurturing and mentoring role.
Universities could also conduct regular network audits reviewing the social
supports available to each individual international student. It would be salutary to
benchmark student services against the loneliness issue. How does each service contribute to modifying and solving loneliness problems? Are the academic staff and
student-servicing staff fully sensitive to loneliness issues? Where are the gaps? What
kind of students are the ones that often are not helped and why? For example, PhD
students need attention because the isolated character of the project carries social
costs, as testified in this study. Does the institution have collective radar capable of
spotting emerging individual problems? How close to fail-safe is it?
24
Season XXXX
However, these measures alone are not enough. They provide a more complete
blanket of support but do not transform the cultural configuration in which loneliness occurs. The symptoms need to be tackled, but so do the deeper causes.
Loneliness and Cultural Difference

We suggest that one deeper cause lies in the cross-cultural aspect of loneliness.
It would be easy to conclude from our findings that international students should
adjust better and quicker to the local culture and that universities should implement
measures facilitating such more effective adjustment. This would not be new. It
has often been said or implied. But adjustment is a one-way concept that begs the
question of where obligation to adjust should fall. It assumes that the local cultural
and educational environment is unchangeable. In doing so, it negates the rights of
international students themselves and their potential to contribute.
If we expect sojourning students to set aside core elements of their identity when
undertaking foreign study, we must recognize that this carries with it potentially
severe individual, economic, and cultural costs. To put the problem bluntly, should
they have to acquire not just English but an ideology of possessive individualism, and
a reduced commitment to the extended family, to cope with being in nations like
Australia? Should they have to drink alcohol to mix successfully with local students?
As some interviewees noted, this is what some male international students, including
Muslim students, are expected to do in Australia to demonstrate their credentials in
adjusting and mixing (though it is more likely to be a social requirement in some
places than in others). But even if it was reasonable, such an approach would be
impractical. International students are often highly flexible in the face of the challenges they face, but few will adopt local values holus-bolus to minimize loneliness.
And why should they? It is not a necessary condition for academic performance; it
would imply that for every cultural gain, there must be a cultural loss; in some cases,
it would be personally destructive.
Cultural loneliness. The present study confirms that loneliness is better understood when cultural variations and intercultural settings are taken into account. We
suggest that to Weiss (1973) categories of emotional (personal) loneliness and
social loneliness, a third category should be added: cultural loneliness. Cultural
loneliness is triggered by the absence of the preferred cultural and/or linguistic environment. The propensity to cultural loneliness explains why some students in this
study, who have apparently adequate access to social networks and sometimes also
have good personal backup, still report a continuing loneliness.
Q. Did you go to your wife, talk to your wife when you felt lonely?
A. Yes, I think so.
25
Q. Or a friend?
A. In fact its hard because you come from different countries. (male, 31, computing,
China)
In the face of this, nationally defined, international student organizations play

an often crucial role as student networks. But these are not a universal panacea.
Students from smaller national communities or nondominant ethnic and language
groupings within a nation or students living in remote locations often lack access
to such organizations. And national organizations cannot altogether compensate for
the lacunae in cross-cultural relationships with local students and staff.
The findings of this study also suggest that Hofstedes (1998) distinction between
individualist and collectivist cultures is powerful in explaining cultural loneliness.
Most international students who study in Australia are from collectivist cultures, and
in Australia, they encounter predominantly Western norms and values that emphasize
individual achievement, competitiveness, and impersonal social relations (Triandis,
1995). Students often find an unaccustomed level of direct pressure on them as
unsupported individuals, triggering a sense of exposure, and social bonds that appear
more loose and detachable than the accustomed ties of family and locality. Cultural
loneliness interacts with and reinforces personal and social loneliness.
In the search for substitutes,6 many make friends among their national compatriots or other international students. A minority try to immerse themselves in the local
culture. Many others approach relations with the locals more partially. Yet relations
with locals might be the key to moving forward on loneliness. One of the strongest
findings of the study was that there was a strong correlation between the incidence of
loneliness and problems with cross-cultural relationships. Two thirds (65%) of the
students who reported feelings of loneliness or isolation in Australia had faced barriers in making friends across cultures, compared to 36% of the nonlonely students. In
other words, same-culture networks, however necessary, are not sufficient to overcome loneliness. This reinforces the point made earlier, that loneliness and isolation
are not the same issue and that overcoming loneliness is not simply a matter of providing basic support structures, for example, in the form of same-culture associations; it goes to the wider question of engagement with mainstream local society.
They [international students] just interact with the same people. Hang on, Ive come
to Australia, I want to meet somebody else. If I wanted to meet my own countrymen
I would stay back in my country. So its a question of how do you break down the
barriers, how do you get people to interact? (male, 29, economics, India)
As noted, other items in the literature on international education confirm that

international students often find relations with local students to be problematic and
disappointing (Lee et al., 2006).
26
Season XXXX
Implications for universities. Australian educational institutions and international

students need to devise ways of better adjusting to and learning from each other while
engaging with a more mixed and complex set of values. In this way, students experiencing cultural loneliness can begin to remake their own cultural maps so as to
achieve a better fit with their new setting on their own terms. Here the single most
important element in strategies of providing a better environment for international
students is to improve relations with local students. If a stronger social bridge
between international students and their local context is to be built, this is the place
to build it.
The obstacles are formidable but not impossible. It is not simply a matter of the
quantity of networking between locals and internationals. As noted, some theorizations of networking and loneliness suggest that the strength of the personal bonds
within networks is also important. Students from individualist cultures have different
assumptions about social bonds from those of students from collectivist cultures.
This can be a barrier to forming cross-cultural friendships in depth. Even when international students have good relations or even friendships with local classmates, this
does not necessarily constitute a satisfying bond. We suggest that if they are to be
assisted in bonding more effectively with international students, local students will
need to become more open to and curious about the lives and values of international
students, enabling them to learn more about the mores of collectivist relationships
to the extent that they not only understand those values better but at least, to some
extent, can practice those values when relating to international students. The task for
universities is to provide conditions enabling local students to undergo a process of
personal transformation that, if not equivalent to that experienced by international
students, at least moves part of the way in the same direction. This is challenging.
Here we suggest that the creation of more successful educational engagements
between international students and local students, based on sharing and mutual
respect in a common learning setting, could reduce the initial sense of loss experienced by international students, shorten the period of anxiety and greatest difficulty,
provide a starting point for social bonding, mitigate cultural shock, and quicken
learning of conversational and academic English. It could reduce cultural loneliness
and social loneliness at the same time. It could play a central role in satisfying the
need of international students to belong, in what for many is a very different country.
It could help those international students find a middle zone where they could engage
with the local culture without abandoning what they know about themselves,
enabling them to have a sense of belonging in both the nation of origin and the nation
of education. It would also enable significant learning experiences for local students.
Although this article does not aim to provide a new set of pedagogic norms to
enable such a change to come about (that project would require further investigation),
we suggest that it would be fruitful to increase the use of small cross-cultural teams
in learning and develop pedagogies that blend selected Western and Asian classroom
27
practices, or move between the different teaching and learning styles, and pedagogies
that draw out in classroom discussion more of the content that international students
have learned in their country of origin, before entering the country of education. A
more sophisticated strategy of cultural interface based on mutual respect would
explore the potential for bilingual education across both groups of students. Here the
inhibiting factor is the largely monocultural character of public discourse and education in Australia, as in other English-speaking nations (except Canada).
Another strategy to enhance connections between international students and their
social localities is to build involvement in community-based sporting clubs, activity
groups, religious institutions, and the like, enabling international students to get to
know Anglo-Australians and others. Universities can help by providing contacts.
Local students can play a crucial enabling role.
Beyond the Universities

The university cannot solve every problem of loneliness and isolation through
its own efforts. Often its role is to provide conditions that enable others to do so.
Furthermore, some students face issues that cannot be dealt with effectively by
talking to family and friends but are also beyond the competence of the university.
This applies particularly to issues that originate from within the university itself,
where there might be some reluctance to act, for example, when the people who
normally help international students are themselves the origin of the problem.
There should be some kind of organization where we can go and just talk it out with
somebody. Because when I was three months here all alone and I was very sad, I
really didnt know where to go. . . . I didnt want to come to my university. (female,
25, media and communication, India)
The New Zealand code of pastoral care provides for an appeals mechanism giving international students somewhere else to go (see Deumert et al., 2005a), but a
point of last resort cannot effectively address day-to-day needs. Community-based
international studentrelated organizations could play a vital role in filling the gap,
provided that they are adequately resourced by the universities and/or the home
governments and/or government of the nation of education.
Further Research
The study suggests a number of avenues for further research.
The causes of and solutions to loneliness could be investigated by focusing on
what happens to the parental bond among sojourners, the nature of and role of
informal networks, and the conditions in which friendships are formed. The consequences of loneliness could also be better understood. One line of inquiry is the
relationship between loneliness and academic achievement and failure.
28
Season XXXX
The present study suggests that there is scope for more closely exploring national
difference as a variable in relation to the incidence of loneliness, the type of loneliness, and the coping strategies used to overcome loneliness. For example, national
difference might impinge on the experience of loneliness because of the kind of values and life practices of students (it could be hypothesized that students from collectivist cultures would feel the absence of strong group settings more keenly while also
being more resourceful in banding together) and also because of differences in the
organizational infrastructures and informal networks of the different national groupings in Australia. Although the present study asked only one question about loneliness, such research would need to explore the issue more thoroughly for these
hypotheses to be tested.7
Another line of inquiry would be to compare the provision of international student services on campus with potential to affect the experience of loneliness (newly
arrived assistance, counseling, crisis management, structured networks and group
activities, activities designed to bring local students together with international students, etc.) with what students from those same universities are saying about their
experiences of loneliness and about the services. As discussed above, this kind of
comparison was not possible in the present study, but it might help in more closely
identifying the techniques and systems with the potential to affect loneliness and
isolation and the limits of those techniques and systems.
NOTES
1. The research was part of a group of projects on cross-border global people
mobility under the heading Global People Markets and Social Protection.
2. This data release generated considerable public interest in Australia and led
to the development and funding of a further research project on The Social and
Economic Protection of Cross-Border Students in the Global Education Market
(Nyland, Marginson, Ramia, & Gallagher, 2005-2007).
3. However, one survey in an institution indicates that international students are
unable to make maximum use of those services: Half of the student respondents
indicated that they were unaware of the particular services named in the survey
(Schweitzer, 1996). This prompted the Western Australian Technology and Industry
Advisory Council (Western Australia State Government, 2000) to recommend that
the universities in that state expose their support services more vigorously.
4. We thank one of the referees for this suggestion.
5. Hofstedes (1998) other four dimensions are power distance, masculinity versus femininity, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term versus short-term orientation.
These are judged to be less relevant to the data gathered in this study but might
become more useful in a related study that investigated in more depth the relationship between experiences of loneliness and cultural difference (see Loneliness and
Cultural Difference).
6. No doubt some girlfriend/boyfriend couplings have their origins in the loss of
contact with family: Deniz (2005) finds, in relation to students in Turkey, that the
loneliness levels of university students who have a romantic relationship were
29
found to be significantly lower than the loneliness levels of other students.

However, none of the interviewees in the study being reported here, who had
boyfriends/girlfriends, actually stated that their romantic relationships originated
from a feeling of loneliness. Interviewees were not closely questioned on the topic
of romantic relationships.
7. Other articles arising from the data set on which this article is based also
explore cross-cultural issues, the subject of several interview questions.
REFERENCES
Andre, R. (1991). Positive solitude: A practical program for mastering loneliness
and achieving self-fulfilment. New York: HarperCollins.
Ari, R., & Hamarta, E. (2000). Investigation of social skills and loneliness level of
university students with respect to their personal characteristics. Selcuk
University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10, 121-134.
Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1986). Exploratory intervention with scale measuring
adjusting to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 31-38.
Baloglu, M. (2000, August). Expectations of international students from counselling services. Paper presented at the Annual Conference on the American
Psychological Association, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document, ED447372)
Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin,
117, 497-529.
Borys, S., & Perlman, D. (1985). Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 63-74.
Brennan, T. (1982). Loneliness at adolescent. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.),
Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory research and therapy (pp. 269-290).
New York: John Wiley.
Brislin, R., & Yoshida, T. (1994). Intercultural communication training: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Church, A. T. (1982). Sojourner adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 540-572.
Cutrona, C. E. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social
adjustment. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of
current theory, research and therapy (pp. 291-309). New York: John Wiley.
De Jong-Gierveld, J. (1987). Developing and testing a model of loneliness. Journal
of Psychology and Social Psychology, 53, 119-128.
Demir, A., & Tarhan, N. (2001). Loneliness and social dissatisfaction in Turkish
adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 135, 113-123.
Deniz, M. E. (2005). An investigation of social skills and loneliness level of university students with respects to their attachment styles in a sample of Turkish
students. Social Behaviour and Personality, 1(1). Retrieved July 21, 2005, from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3852/is_200501/ai_n9520806
30
Season XXXX
Department of Employment, Science and Training. (2005). Selected higher education statistics. Retrieved November 9, 2005, from http://www.dest.gov.au/
sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/students_2004_select
ed_higher_education_statistics.htm
Deumert, A., Marginson, S., Nyland, C., Ramia, G., & Sawir, E. (2005a). The social
and economic security of international students in Australia: A study of 200 student cases. Monash Center for Research in International Education, Monash
University. Retrieved November 9, 2005, from http://www.education.monash.edu
.au/centres/mcrie/docs/researchreports/202-interviews-updated060605.doc
Deumert, A., Marginson, S., Nyland, C., Ramia, G., & Sawir, E. (2005b). Global
migration and social protection: The social and economic security of foreign
students in Australia. Global Social Policy, 5, 329-352.
DiTommaso, E., & Spinner, B. (1997). Social and emotional loneliness: A reexamination of Weiss typology of loneliness. Personality and Individual
Differences, 22, 417-427.
Dobson, J. E., Campbell, N. J., & Dobson, R. (1987). Relationships among loneliness, perception of school, and grade point average of high school juniors. The
School Counsellor, 35, 143-148.
Green, L. R., Richardson, D. S., & Schatten-Jones, E. C. (2001). Network correlates of social and emotional loneliness in young and older adults. Society for
Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 281-288.
Grinberg, L., & Grinberg, R. (1989). Psychoanalytic perspectives on migration and
exile. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gudykunst, W. B., Nishida, T., & Schmidt, K. L. (1989). The influence of cultural
variability and uncertainty reduction in in-group vs. out-group and same vs. opposite sex relationships. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 13-29.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Think locally, act globally: Cultural constraints in personal
management. Management International Review, 38, 7-26.
Hojat, M. (1982). Loneliness as a function of selected personality variables.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 137-141.
Hui, C. H. (1988). Measurement of individualism and collectivism. Journal of
Research in Personality, 22, 17-36.
Illing, D. (2005, March 16). The murder that nobody noticed. The Australian, p. 35.
Jacob, E. (2001). Using counselor training and collaborative programming strategies in working with international students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling
and Development, 29, 73-88.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1992). An attachment-theoretical approach to
romantic love and religious beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
18, 266-275.
Lee, J., Maldonado-Maldonado, A., & Rhoades, G. (2006). The political economy
of international student flows: Patterns, ideas and propositions. In J. C. Smart
(Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 21, pp. 545590). Netherland: Springer.
31
Leong, F. T. L., & Sedlacek, W. E. (1986). A comparison of international students

and US students preference for help sources. Journal of College Student
Personnel, 27, 426-430.
Lewis, N. (2005). Code of practice for the pastoral care of international students:
Making a globalizing industry in New Zealand. Globalisation, Societies and
Education, 3, 5-47.
Lunt, P. K. (1991). The perceived causal structure of loneliness. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 26-34.
Misra, S. (1999, August). Cross cultural variation in loneliness: Implications
for marketing. CCRS Proceedings, 1999. Retrieved August 19, 2005, from
http://marketing.byu.edu/htmlpages/ccrs/proceedings99/misra1.htm
Mori, S. (2000). Addressing the mental health concerns of international students.
Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 137-144.
Moroi, K. (1986). Loneliness induced by situational changes in lives of freshmen.
Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-125.
Nurmi, J. E., Toivonen, S., Salmera-Aro, K., & Eronen, A. (1997). Social strategies
and loneliness. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 764-778.
Nyland, C., Marginson, S., Ramia, G., & Gallagher, M. (2005-2007). The social
and economic protection of cross-border students in the global education market. Australian Research Council Discovery grant project. Melbourne, Australia:
Monash University. Faculty of Business and Economics.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004). Internationalization and trade in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Paris: Author.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Education at a
glance. Paris: Author.
Osterman, K. F. (2001). Students need for belonging in the school community.
Review of Educational Research, 70, 323-367.
Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the
quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook
of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224-237). New York: John Wiley.
Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau &
D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and
therapy (pp. 1-20). New York: John Wiley.
Pergament, K. I. (1990). God help me: Toward a theoretical framework of copying
for the psychology of religion. Research in Social Scientific Study of Religion,
2, 195-224.
Poyrazli, S., Arbona, C., Bullington, R., & Pisecco, S. (2001). Adjustment issues
of Turkish college students studying in the United States. College Student
Journal, 35, 52-62.
Rokach, A. (1988). The experience of loneliness: A tri-level model. Journal of
Psychology, 122, 531-544.
Rokach, A. (1989). Antecedents of loneliness: A factorial analysis. Journal of
Psychology, 123, 369-384.
32
Season XXXX
Rokach, A. (1990). Surviving and coping with loneliness. Journal of Psychology,

124, 39-54.
Rokach, A., & Brock, H. (1998). Coping with loneliness. Journal of Psychology,
132, 107-127.
Rubenstein, C. M., & Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. In L. A.
Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory,
research and therapy (pp. 206-223). New York: John Wiley.
Russell, D., Cutrona, D., Rose, J., & Yurko, K. (1984). Social and emotional loneliness: An examination of Weisss typology of loneliness. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 46, 1313-1321.
Russell, D., Peplau, L., & Cutrona, C. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale:
Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Gurung, R. A. R. (1997). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. In S. W. Duck
(Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and intervention
(2nd ed., pp. 547-573). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Schweitzer, R. (1996). Problems and awareness of support services among students
at an urban Australian university. Journal of American College Health, 45, 73-81.
Snider, P. D. (2001). Counseling for international students in western universities: A
cross-cultural examination of counseling expectations and services. International
Education Journal, 2, 61-85.
Solano, C. H., & Koester, N. H. (1989). Loneliness and communication problems:
Subjective anxiety or objective skills? Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 15, 126-133.
Stokes, J. P. (1985). The relation of social network and individual difference variables to loneliness. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 981-990.
Stuewe-Portnoff, G. (1988). Loneliness: Lost in the landscape of meaning. Journal
of Psychology, 122, 545-555.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In
J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 41-133). Lincoln:
University of Nebraska Press.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Oxford: Westview.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988).
Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup
relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
Weiss, R. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Western Australia State Government (Western Australian Technology and Industry
Advisory Council). (2000). Export of Western Australian Education & Training:
Constraints & Opportunities. Perth: Author.
33
Wikipedia. (2005). Zhang Hong Jie. Retrieved October 21, 2005, from http://en
.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Jie_Zhang
World Bank. (2006). World Bank data and statistics. Retrieved June 25, 2006, from
http://www.worldbank.org/data
ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Erlenawati Sawir is a sociolinguist who works on intercultural communication,
globalization, and international education as a Research Fellow in the Center for the
Study of Higher Education (CSHE), University of Melbourne, Australia.
Simon Marginson is a professor of higher education who works on comparative and
international higher education in the context of globalization, in the CSHE, University
of Melbourne. He is also an Australian Professorial Fellow.
Ana Deumert is a sociolinguist who works in the Faculty of Arts, Monash University,
Australia. Her research covers language planning/policy, language and migration, language contact, and second-language acquisition.
Chris Nyland is a professor of international business who works also on the history of
economic and management thought in the Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash
University, Australia.
Gaby Ramia works on international business and social policy in the Faculty of
Business and Economics, Monash University, Australia.

Loneliness Research

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Loneliness Research

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Loneliness Research

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Loneliness and International Students:

Journal of Studies in International Education

any mans death diminishes me,

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

Journal of Studies in International Education

Typically, universities provide support for international students that is intended to

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

The Need to Belong

Journal of Studies in International Education

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

Loneliness and Individual Differences

Journal of Studies in International Education

Coping With Loneliness

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

International Students and Loneliness

Journal of Studies in International Education

unawareness of its existence, or concerns about trustfulness, problems of shame and

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

Self-Reported Problems With Loneliness, by National Origin

a. Brunei,Thailand, and Papua New Guinea.

Q. HAVE YOU EXPERIENCED A PERIOD

Journal of Studies in International Education

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

Composition of Students Networks in Australia

Networks and Associations Include

Close friends including boyfriends/girlfriends

Casual friends: other international students

Casual friends: local students

Q. Are there significant barriers in making

The Yes Response (Those Experiencing Loneliness/Isolation)

Journal of Studies in International Education

Triggers of Loneliness, Interviews With 200 International Students,

Total students interviewed = 200

[No trigger(s) of loneliness specified]a

Personal (emotional) loneliness

Shock of the new culture

Obstacles to social networking

Difficulties in handling problemsb

Personal characteristics of interviewee

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

Loneliness in institutional settings: If I knew that I would be so isolated, maybe

Journal of Studies in International Education

Q. Who Do You Turn to in the Face of Loneliness?

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

Copying Strategies of Lonely International Students

Total students = 200

I turn to relationships in Australia

Spouse, siblings, other relatives

Family and relatives

I use other coping strategies

Grand total all responses

Journal of Studies in International Education

Penetration of Information and Communication Technologies in

Source:World Bank (2006).

Sawir et al. / Loneliness and International Students

Journal of Studies in International Education

For one student, religious activity strengthened his sense of himself.

The No Response (Not Experiencing

No personal loneliness: I have family here. Some avoid loneliness because

Good social networks: I was lucky to be in a college environment. Others like