Dimensions of Iqbal

Iqbal, the Sufi Epistemology,

and the End Of History
Imran N. Hosein

e attempt in this paper to examine the appearance of an

W epistemological paradox in the thought of Dr. Muhammad

Iqbal.
There was that knowledge which he imparted to his
native people that touched their very souls and fired them with a
scorching reaffirmation of commitment to Islam. It was communicated in
Urdu and Persian. Had it been communicated in English, the European
world of scholarship would have rejected it and sneered at it. Iqbal would
have suffered a loss of status amongst his European peers. And then
there was that other knowledge which he communicated in English. It
impressed European scholarship, as well as his Western-educated
countrymen. Had some of it been communicated in Urdu or Persian (i.e.,
his rejection of belief in the advent of Imam Al-Mahdi, the release of
Dajjal, and the return of Prophet Jesus), it would have created serious
and abiding problems for him amongst the Muslim masses. To this day
there are many Muslims who are inspired by Iqbal, but remain blissfully
ignorant of the views mentioned above.
The dualism in Iqbal’s thought and works is compounded by the
fact that he sometimes says one thing in English, and then proceeds to
say something quite different in Urdu or Persian.
For example, he agrees with the Turkish Ijtihad (if it may be
called such) to the effect that the Imamate or Caliphate (which was
abolished by the Turks in 1924) can be vested in a body of persons or an
elected Assembly. Provided that a modern Parliament can be constituted
of good Muslims, Iqbal would be willing to accept it as a valid substitute
for the Caliphate. Yet Iqbal, in verse, urges the restoration of the
Caliphate, and seeks that mobilization of the spirit which would make it
possible:

The writer is Imam and Director of Islamic Studies, Masjid Dar-ul-Qur’an, Long
Island, New York (USA).
Iqbal, Sufi Epistemology, and the End of History 41

To once again establish,

The foundation Khilafah in the world,
You must bring from somewhere,
The mettle of your ancestors.
Iqbal is also quite explicit in his rejection of belief in the advent
of Imam Al-Mahdi and in the return of Prophet Jesus (AS). This is what
he says:
[The doctrine of the finality of prophethood] may further be
regarded as a psychological cure for the Magian attitude of
constant expectation which tends to give a false view of
history. Ibn Khaldun, seeing the spirit of his own view of
history, has fully criticized and, I believe, finally demolished
the alleged revelational basis in Islam of an idea similar, at
least in its psychological effects, to the original Magian idea
which had reappeared in Islam under the pressure of Magian
thought.1
Indeed, in his letter to Muhammad Ahsan it would appear that he
adds belief in the advent of Dajjal to the list of Magian ideas which, he
claims, have infiltrated into Islamic thought. This is clear from his use of
the word masihiyat 2 Yet Iqbal, in verse, is fairly explicit in the
affirmation of belief in the advent of Imam Al-Mahdi:

Out of the seclusion of the desert of Hejaz,

The Guide of the Time is to come.
And from this far, far away valley,
The Caravan is to make its appearance.
The view has been expressed that Iqbal’s Khidr-e-Waqt was
none other than Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. We disagree. By
no stretch of the imagination can Jinnah be conceived of having emerged
from a distant valley in the Hejaz. Nor could Sultan Abdul Aziz bin Saud
be conceived as Khidr-e-Waqt. Who then, was Iqbal referring to?
We trace this apparently disturbing dualism in Iqbal’s thought
and works and suggest that it resulted from an epistemological
ambivalence in his thought. Different epistemologies function at
different levels of consciousness. Iqbal’s theoretic consciousness
functioned with one epistemology. His aesthetic and spiritual
consciousness functioned with another. Unless one succeeds in
integrating all levels of consciousness in the personality, an
epistemological ambivalence and a dualism in thought can appear.
42 The Qur’anic Horizons 4:1

It is a disservice to Iqbal to suggest that the explanation lies in

his speaking one way to his European audience, and in another to his
native audience. He is too great a scholar to have displayed such lack of
integrity.
Sufi Epistemology
The Sufis have a consistent record of not only recognizing, but,
also, of using the heart as a vehicle for the acquisition of knowledge.
That experience of the heart, through which it “sees” and penetrates
“truth,” is frequently referred to as “religious experience.” In its wider
sense, religious experience also includes that intuitive grasp which
delivers to the believer the “substance” or “reality” of things. The
Prophet (SAW) referred to it when he warned: “Fear the firasah (i.e.,
intuitive capacity for penetrating the substance of things) of the believer,
for surely he sees with the light of Allah (SWT).” And Iqbal himself
directed attention to it in his famous couplet:

For thousands of years,

The narcissus bemoans its blindness;
It takes ages before the discerning soul,
Appears in the garden.
Iqbal’s deedawar — the discerning soul — is clearly he who sees with
an inner light. Iqbal is, himself, a true expression of a deedawar.
The epistemology, which embraces “religious experience” as a
source of knowledge, is herein referred to as the Sufi epistemology.
All through history, it was always important for the seeker of
knowledge to be able to penetrate the “substance” or “reality” of things.
But that would become absolutely essential in an age in which
“appearance” and “reality” would be in total conflict with each other.
“Appearance” would be so dangerous that, if accepted, would lead to the
destruction of faith. And so, in that age, survival would depend upon the
capacity to penetrate beyond external form to reach internal substance,
and thus be saved from being deceived and destroyed. Islam has declared
that such an age would appear before the end of the world. And herein
lies the abiding importance of the Sufi epistemology.
The Prophet (SAW) advised that Suarh Al-Kahf (Chapter 18) of
the Qur’an be recited every Friday for protection from the fitnah
(deception, trial) of Dajjal. His modus operandi is that of functioning by
Iqbal, Sufi Epistemology, and the End of History 43

deception. The story, in Surah Al-Kahf, of Moses (AS) and Khidr (AS)
revealed the inadequacy of that epistemology which admits of
knowledge only through observation. Moses (AS) is mistaken on all
three occasions. Khidr (AS) on the other hand, who sees with the light of
Allah (SWT), corrects the mistakes which Moses made. The story also
indirectly points an ominous finger at the misguided community (or
Ummah) of Moses (AS), i.e., the Jews, as the people who would
experience the greatest deception, would be deceived and would then fail
to read accurately the historical process. In consequence of being
deceived they would blindly follow the most dangerous of all Pied
Pipers, Al-Masih Al-Dajjal, to their final destruction in history. My view
is that deception has already taken place, and the final destruction of the
Jews is now assured.
Iqbal is himself the best example of a scholar with a matchless
capacity to penetrate beyond appearances to grasp the reality of things.
He made a thorough and penetrating study of modern Western
civilization and came to the conclusion that its appearance was quite
different from its reality. Just three months before his death he tore away
the veil or appearance of “progress,” and delivered a stinging
denunciation of the modern West. Many, including the likes of Shaikh
Muhammad Abduh, as well as today’s secular liberals, have declared that
they have seen Islam itself in the modern West. Iqbal was not deceived:
The modern age prides itself on its progress in knowledge and
its matchless scientific development. No doubt, the pride is
justified…. But in spite of all these developments, tyranny of
imperialism struts abroad, covering its face in the masks of
Democracy, Nationalism, Communism, Fascism, and heavens
know what else besides. Under these masks, in every corner of
the earth, the spirit of freedom and the dignity of man are
being trampled underfoot in a way of which not even the
darkest period of human history presents a parallel.3
Epistemology of the Modern West
Modern Western civilization emerged in consequence of sudden
unprecedented change that overtook Europe. A civilization which was
previously based on faith (in Christianity), and which had given
collective and dramatic expression of that faith in the Crusades,
experienced such radical change as transformed it into a civilization now
based on materialism. The new epistemology, which paved the way for
the collective embrace of materialism, was one that specifically denied
the possibility of knowledge being acquired through religious
experience, or through revelations from the unseen. Observation and
44 The Qur’anic Horizons 4:1

experimentation were the only valid means through which knowledge

could be acquired. That which could not be observed could not be
known. The new epistemology naturally paved the way for a dramatic
conclusion, to wit: a world, which could not be observed and known, did
not exist. Hence there is no reality beyond material reality.
Iqbal’s Epistemological Response
Iqbal realized that the acceptance of this Western epistemology
would result in the complete destruction of religion in the world of Islam.
Knowledge would be secularized, and the secularized mind would be cut
off from the Unseen world — the world of the Sacred. The heart would
then lose that sacred light without which its sight is, at best, dim. Even
the best scholars in the world of Islam would then be in danger of being
deceived by essentially Godless Western Pied Pipers, and all of mankind
would dance to their tunes. Islam would be so secularized that a
Protestant version of Islam would emerge. An age, which had already
experienced the total dominance of Western civilization over all of
mankind, posed a great danger of precisely such an epistemological
penetration of the Muslim mind.
Iqbal’s response was to devote two of the seven lectures of the
Reconstruction to a vigorous defense of the Sufi epistemology, and to
place these two lectures at the very beginning of the series. They occupy
the same prominent position in the book.
In “Knowledge and Religious Experience” and “The
Philosophical Test of the Revelations of Religious Experience,” Iqbal
presented the most well-reasoned and persuasive challenge to the new
Western epistemology ever penned by a Muslim. These first two
chapters of the Reconstruction were produced and prominently placed
for precisely this purpose, i.e., to stimulate Islamic scholarship to probe
with Allah’s light, and to penetrate beyond the seductive appearances
presented by the Modern Age, in order to reach its poisonous reality.
More than sixty years have passed since that challenge (in the
first two chapters of Reconstruction) was offered, yet neither has
Western scholarship condescended to respond, nor has Islamic
scholarship cared to follow in the epistemological trail which he blazed.
Indeed, this failure on the part of Islamic scholarship is partly responsible
for the terrible plight in which the world of Islam now finds itself. The
Western world, with its secularized system of education, its politics of
power-lust, greed and polarization of society, and its economics of
exploitation, has enjoyed almost total success in deceiving the world of
Islam and in thus leading it down the road of impotence, anarchy,
Iqbal, Sufi Epistemology, and the End of History 45

intellectual confusion, and the ruination of faith. The largest Muslim

country in the world today, Indonesia, now stands at the very brink of
being lost to Islam.
Iqbal’s Ambivalence
From his teen-aged days as a college student in Lahore to his
university education in Europe, Iqbal’s exposure to Western thought was
continuously intimate. He also lived in an age that was forced to observe
the literal explosion of Western scholarship on the stage of the world.
History had never witnessed anything comparable to that scholarship
which dramatically extended the frontiers of knowledge in nearly every
conceivable branch of knowledge. The scientific revolution of the West
was something unique in the world of knowledge. More often than not
Iqbal’s respect for Western scholarship grew into outright admiration.
Our view is that this admiration for Western scholarship provoked a
corollary. It revealed itself in the startling accusation that “during the last
five hundred years religious thought in Islam has been practically
stationary.”4 And the consequence of that profound admiration was
found in the Reconstruction, which is littered with references to, and
quotations from, his peers in the world of Western scholarship. There
was no such peer within his own community, and so there is not a single
reference in the Reconstruction to a contemporary Muslim scholar in the
huge and intellectually influential Indian Muslim community.
This ambivalence, this love-hate relationship which found
expression in the first two chapters of the Reconstruction, as in the
endless references to Western scholars, was also revealed in Iqbal’s
choice of language for addressing Muslims on as important a subject as
the reconstruction of their religious thought. He chose to address the
Western-educated Muslim intelligentsia. Even so, it must have been an
absolutely amazing spectacle to behold Iqbal, sixty long years ago,
addressing his largely uncomprehending Muslim audience (one needs to
have some knowledge of philosophy in order to comprehend these
lectures) in chaste English and in a manner which conformed to Western
linguistic etiquette and sensibilities. It must have been an equally
amazing sight to behold the same Iqbal using the native Urdu and Persian
languages to convey through poetry a message whose form and
substance was quite alien to the Western mind.
We believe that Iqbal was not, himself, immune from the
negative influence of the very Western epistemology of which he warned
so strongly. His poetry, which came directly from the heart, witnessed
the unsurpassed use of the Sufi epistemology and was uncluttered by any
46 The Qur’anic Horizons 4:1

Western logical or epistemological restraints. The same cannot always be

said of his thought when expressed in English. Our purpose in this paper
is to direct attention to a subject which, more than any other, illustrates
Iqbal’s epistemological ambivalence. That subject is “the end of history.”
Islam and the End of History
Is there an Islamic view of the end of history? Did Iqbal ever
address it?
It is appropriate, in the context of the subject we are here
examining, to note that Islam has chosen terminology located in time for
referring to the end of the world. The Islamic word is “the Hour” (Al-
Sa‘ah). The supreme importance of this subject of “the Hour,” i.e., the
end of history, was established in the famous visit of Archangel Gabriel
(AS) when he appeared before the Prophet (SAW) in the mosque in the
form of a man. He asked questions, the Prophet (SAW) answered them,
and Gabriel (AS) then confirmed that the answers were correct.
Sometime after his departure the Prophet (SAW) informed the Muslims
of the identity of the visitor, and of the fact that he had come (at that very
late stage in the life of the Prophet) to instruct them in their religion. He
had asked five questions, and two of these related to the end of history.
The first was: when will the end come? And the Prophet (SAW) had
replied to the effect that the one who was being questioned had no more
knowledge of the subject than the questioner. The second question was:
tell me of the signs by which we would know that the end is at hand?
(i.e., what are some of the signs by which we would recognize the age
which would witness the end of history?) He replied to the effect that a
slave girl would give birth to her mistress (and this has now become a
possibility because of surrogate parenting), and that the barefooted
shepherds of yesterday would be competing with each other in
constructing high-rise buildings. (Some of the foremost scholars of Islam
in this age have declared that this sign has now materialized).
This extraordinary hadith amply demonstrated the supreme
importance that Islam has attached to the subject of the end of history. It
also clearly establishes that we now live in the last age.
The Islamic view of the last age is quite comprehensive. It
includes the belief that the earth would function as habitat for a limited
duration. (Al-Baqarah 2:36). The earth would one day be transformed
into a dust bowl. (Al-Kahf 18:8). This implies that the end-time, which
witnesses the death of the earth, would be preceded by an age of a
constantly diminishing supply of (sweet) water, leading, eventually, to
extreme scarcity of water. The Prophet (SAW) described that last age as
Iqbal, Sufi Epistemology, and the End of History 47

the age of fitan (i.e., tests and trials), and the Qur’an warned that all of
mankind would be targeted, and that Allah’s Punishment would be
terrible. (Al-Anfal 8:25).
The constantly diminishing supply of water would take place in
consequence of the release into the world, by Allah (SWT), of evil
beings whom He created, viz., Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj. The last two
chapters of the Qur’an were specifically devoted to warning the believers
of the very great dangers which would emerge in the world in
consequence of the release of “evil created by Allah.” The evil would
appear as “evil beings” created by Allah (SWT) to test and to punish.
They are Ya’jooj, Ma’jooj and Dajjal. The Prophet (SAW) described
Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj to be such thirsty beings that they would drink up all
the water of the world. They would pass by a river, he said, and they
would drink it dry.5 The last age would thus be characterized by over-
consumption, waste, and disrespect for water. Mankind would witness, in
the last age, riots and wars fought over water.
When we look around us in the world, it appears to be quite clear
that the countdown has already begun. There is an ominous and growing
shortage of water in nearly all parts of the world today. The head of the
U. N. Environment Program has recently expressed his fear that the
world is heading towards a “period of water wards between nations.” A
Pakistani government minister has warned of the likelihood of riots over
water in Karachi. The Kalabagh Dam project threatens bloodshed. The
Farrakha Dam, built by India, threatens to drown Bangladesh. Turkey
and Syria are poised on the brink of war. Water is one of the issues that
divide them. Israel, the Palestinian Arabs, and the neighboring Arab
Sates (particularly Jordan) have serious and growing differences over the
sharing of dwindling water supplies.
It would therefore appear that the release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj
has already taken place. Iqbal agrees. Indeed, he appears to be one of the
very few scholars of Islam to have ever had the vision and the courage to
make a formal declaration that the release has taken place and, as a
consequence, that we now live in the last age, or the age which will
witness the end of history. The declaration was made in Urdu verse, and,
predictably, there is not even a hint of it in any of his writings or
statements made in English. This is the verse:

The hordes of Gog and Magog,

Have all been released;
48 The Qur’anic Horizons 4:1

The Muslim can see with his eyes,

The meaning of yansiloon.
The word yansiloon, which occurs at the end of the verse, and to
the tafseer (interpretation) of which Iqbal has directed the attention of the
Muslims, refers to a passage of the Qur’an in Surah Al-Anbia in which
Allah, Most High, declares that when Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj are released
they will descend from every direction (min kulli hadabin yansiloon).
Here is the passage:
And there is a ban on a town which We destroyed, that they
shall not return (i.e., the town shall not be restored), until
Ya’jooj (Gog) and Ma’jooj (Magog) are let through (the
barrier which Dhul-Qarnain built in order to contain them),
and they descend from every direction. (Al-Anbia 21:95, 96)
This indicates that Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj would not only become
the dominant force in the world, but that their power would subdue all of
mankind. Indeed their power would be such that, according to a Hadith
Al-Qudsi, Allah (SWT) has Himself declared: “none but I can destroy
them.”6
Our view is that Iqbal arrived at this amazingly accurate
conclusion eighty years ago in consequence of his use of the Sufi
epistemology. He not only made a critical and an acute observation of
the historical process, and of the world which confronted him, but he also
had the courage to make an intellectual leap for a startling intuitive grasp
which delivered to him, for one dazzling moment in time, the very
substance of the subject. The uneducated say many things without
knowledge. But when a scholar of the Qur’an makes a declaration such
as this, one cannot but pause in admiration, and with praise for Allah
(SWT), the Source of all knowledge. Conventional Islamic scholarship,
unable or unwilling to reach out for that intuitive grasp of the subject, is
yet to pronounce on the release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj. For Iqbal, on the
other hand, modern Western civilization is the civilization of Ya’jooj and
Ma’jooj. (This is the view of Prof. Muhammad Munawwar.)
We believe that Iqbal was absolutely correct. Consider the
following:
The Caliphate is an institution central to the collective integrity
of the Muslim Ummah. Although the seat of the Caliphate was oftimes
filled in a manner which did not conform to the Shari‘ah of Islam, the
office of the Caliphate survived for some 1300 years. There is an
indication of a prophecy of the destruction of the Caliphate, and of its
restoration at the time of the advent of Imam Al-Mahdi, in the famous
Iqbal, Sufi Epistemology, and the End of History 49

hadith in which the Prophet (SAW) spoke of the return of Prophet Jesus
(AS): “How will you be when the Son of Mary descends amongst you
and your Imam will be from amongst yourselves.” (Sahih Bukhari)
Within seven years of Iqbal’s pronouncement concerning the
release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj in 1917, the unprecedented power and
influence of today’s dominant Western civilization led to the destruction
of the Ottoman Islamic Empire and, subsequently, to the collapse of the
Caliphate.
Secondly, the Hajj is an institution which is even more central in
importance to Islam, and which has survived for thousands of years. The
Prophet (SAW) has prophesied the abandonment of the Hajj in the
context of the aftermath of the release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj. The
fulfillment of that prophecy appears to be imminent. It should come to
pass as soon as the Jews deliver on their promise to destroy Masjid Al-
Aqsa in order to rebuild the Temple of Solomon (AS). When it does
come to pass it will confirm, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Iqbal
was absolutely correct in this pronouncement concerning the release of
Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj.
Thirdly, the basic characteristic of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj is their
fasad (i.e., their conduct which corrupts, spoils, ruins). (Al-Kahf 18:94).
The age of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj would thus be one of immense and
unprecedented corruption. Everything will be corrupted — religion and
religious scholars; government and political life; the market, the
economy, and the world of finance or money; law and justice;
transportation, the environment, even the ecological system of the earth;
sex, marriage and family life; sports and entertainment; education, youth,
the role of women in society, and so on. When we look around us in the
world today we find ample evidence of this universal corruption,
indicating that Iqbal was correct, and that the countdown has begun.
Fourthly, another basic characteristic of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj is
their Godlessness and immorality (khabath). The Godlessness was
described in a Hadith Al-Qudsi in which we were informed that only one
of every 1000 of the end-time would enter into heaven (and that person
would be a follower of the Prophet). The rest, 999 out of every 1000,
would all be the people of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj and would all be sent to
Hell.7 The immorality was described in a hadith in which the Prophet
(SAW) conveyed to this wife, Ummul Mo’mineen Zainab (RAA), the
news that the advent of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj would be in consequence of
the increase of khabath in the world.8 The Qur’anic use of the term
khabath includes that sexual perversity which characterized Sodom and
50 The Qur’anic Horizons 4:1

Gomorrah. There is sufficient Godlessness, immorality, and sexual

perversity in the world today to qualify for the description given by the
Prophet (SAW). Again Iqbal is correct.
A fifth characteristic of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj, and one which also
follows from the above, is that they will transform all of mankind into
one single global society in which all will follow essentially the same
way of life. It will be Godless and decadent. Already that single Godless,
decadent society has embraced the elite around the world. The process is
now moving inexorably to embrace the masses as well. The actual hadith
is that Ya’jooj, the community (Ummah), will expand to incorporate
another four hundred communities (umam). Ma’jooj, the Ummah, would
do the same. And so the world of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj would be an ever-
expanding globalized world of information, communication,
entertainment, and culture, etc. It will culminate in one essentially
Godless and decadent global society with the mental and spiritual
illumination of Kentucky Fried Chicken and Coca Cola. A world
government will preside over it. Television has played, and still plays, a
crucial role in the relentless pursuit of that goal — a goal that now
appears to be quite within reach. This confirms Iqbal’s declaration.
Sixthly, perhaps the most significant clue of the release of
Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj, and ominous consequences of that release for the
world of Islam, is located in the hadith (referred to above) in which the
Prophet (s) spoke to his wife, Ummul Mo’mineen Zainab (RAA), about
the release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj. His words were: “Woe unto the
Arabs, because of an evil which is now approaching.” In other words, the
release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj would result in great calamities and
suffering in the Arab world in particular. The clue is expressed quite
explicitly in the Qur’an, however, when Allah (SWT) declared of a town
(or city) which He had destroyed, that its restoration would never be
possible until the release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj makes it possible. (See
reference to ayaat 95 & 96 of Surah Al-Anbia above).
My own use of the Sufi epistemology led me to the conclusion
that the town was Jerusalem (i.e., the State of Israel). If I am correct, and
Allah (SWT) knows best, then the Qur’an is declaring that the State of
Israel, destroyed by Allah (SWT) twice in history, would be restored
when Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj are released, and, as a consequence, that
restoration formed part of the Divine Plan through which Dajjal would
deceive the Jews and lead them to their final destruction. Indeed, this is
precisely why he is known as Al-Masih Al-Dajjal. The identification of
the “town” with Jerusalem is not far-fetched at all. There are several
ahadith which link Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj with Jerusalem (i.e., the State of
Iqbal, Sufi Epistemology, and the End of History 51

Israel). For example, the Prophet (SAW) said that when Ya’jooj and
Ma’jooj are released they will pass by the Sea of Galilee (which is in
Israel).9 Then there is a very long hadith in Sahih Muslim in which we
are told that Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj will seek to attack Prophet Jesus (AS)
in Jerusalem.
It should be noted that the Jordanian Israeli Peace Treaty
required Israel to supply Jordan with a certain amount of water on a
regular basis. Israel could only fulfill this treaty obligation by pumping
water from the Sea of Galilee. The water level in the Sea of Galilee has
now reached so low that further pumping of water would cause damage
to its capacity to store water. Consequently, Israel has been forced to
suspend its fulfillment of its treaty obligation concerning the supply of
water to Jordan. Israel has recently told Jordan that the latter’s share of
water will be reduced by 60% during the coming summer due to “low
rain fall.” In response, the Jordanian Foreign Minister has urged Israel to
fulfill its commitment and to carry out the signed agreement. The
countdown has begun!
The restoration of the State of Israel not only confirmed the
release of Dajjal and of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj, but it also constituted a
veritable dagger plunged into the very heart of the Arab Muslim world.
This, in turn, fulfilled the ominous prophecy: “woe unto the Arabs.” We
may add, in passing, that the feminist revolution of the modern age (in
which night wants to become day) confirms that Dajjal is now in the last
stage of his mission.
I was pleasantly surprised to find this conclusion confirmed by
eminent Sufi Sheikhs. It is just possible that Iqbal came to the same
conclusion and this was one of the reasons why he called for attention to
be devoted to tafseer harf-e-yansiloon. After all, the Zionist Movement
was established in 1898, and the alliance between the Zionists and the
modern West was painfully revealed to Iqbal in the Balfour Declaration
of 1917.
Iqbal’s Epistemological Ambivalence and the End of History
The major actors in the last stage of history, viz., Ya’jooj and
Ma’jooj, Dajjal, Imam Al-Mahdi, and the return of Prophet Jesus (AS),
and the respective roles which they play, all combine to form an
integrated inseparable whole. It is beyond the scope of this article to
describe that whole, which requires another paper. That paper will
appropriately be entitled tafseer harf-e-yansiloon.
What is truly alarming is that despite Iqbal’s amazing and
52 The Qur’anic Horizons 4:1

accurate confirmation of the release of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj, he rejected

belief in Dajjal, Imam Al-Mahdi and the return of Prophet Jesus (AS).
What possible explanation could there be for this truly unfortunate
situation? Also, how do we explain the surprising fact that apart for that
one couplet on Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj Iqbal is otherwise completely silent
on the subject?
My view is that if Iqbal were alive today, the unfolding events in
the world, and, in particular, in the Middle East, would have forced him
to change his views with respect to Mahdi, Dajjal, and the return of
Prophet Jesus (AS). Did he not himself say: Only stones do not change!
It was because the reality of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj was established
by the Qur’an that there was no way that Iqbal could have dismissed the
subject. The corollary is that if Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj had not been
established in the Qur’an, and were dependent on the ahadith, they
would have suffered the same fate as belief in the advent of Imam Al-
Mahdi, Dajjal, and the return of Prophet Jesus (AS). When Iqbal turned
to the study of these subjects he appears to have experienced an
epistemological transformation. The spiritual or religious consciousness
was used to study the subject of Ya’jooj and Ma’jooj. The light of Allah
(SWT) illumined the path for a dazzling display of the intuitive embrace
of truth. On the other hand, it was the theoretic consciousness which was
used to study the other verities which were not established by the Qur’an.
I also suspect an impact of Iqbal’s philosophical training, as well as the
Western epistemology, on Iqbal’s theoretic consciousness, when he
directed attention to the verities of the last age which were located in the
ahadith. This appears to be a subject worthy of serious study by a
psychologist who is also capable of examining spiritual realities.
Endnotes
1. Iqbal, Dr. Muhammad., Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, ed.
by M. Saeed Shaikh (Lahore: Institute of Islamic Culture, 1986) p. 115
2. Iqbalnama, Vol. II, p. 231. Quoted in M. Saeed Sheikh, “Editor’s
Introduction” to Iqbal’s Reconstruction, op. cit., p. xi.
3. Iqbal, Dr. Muhammad., New Year’s Message, Broadcast from All India
Radio, Lahore, on January 1, 1938. Quoted in Syed Abdul Vahid, Thoughts
and Reflections of Iqbal (Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, 1964) p. 373.
4. Iqbal, Reconstruction, op. cit., p. 6.
5. Kanz Al-Ummal, Vol. 7, Hadith No. 2157
6. Kanz Al-Ummal , Vol. 7, Hadith No. 3021
7. Sahih Bukhari, 4:567; 6:265; 8:537
8. Sahih Bukhari, 4:797; 9:181; 9:249
Iqbal, Sufi Epistemology, and the End of History 53

9. Kanz Al-Ummal, Vol 7, Hadith No. 3021