Rainbow Products - Part A
Rainbow Products - Part A
Rainbow Products - Part A
k=
Time
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
12%
Cost
(35,000)
Savings
Additional
Outflows
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
NPV=
IRR=
MIRR=
Payback=
($946)
Total Net CF
(35,000)
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
PV of CF
(35,000.00)
4,464.29
3,985.97
3,558.90
3,177.59
2,837.13
2,533.16
2,261.75
2,019.42
1,803.05
1,609.87
1,437.38
1,283.38
1,145.87
1,023.10
913.48
check:
(945.68)
11.49%
11.80%
7 years
Total Net CF
PV of CF
(35,000)
(35,000.00)
4,500
4,017.86
4,500
3,587.37
4,500
3,203.01
4,500
2,859.83
4,500
2,553.42
infinity
infinity
Problem simplifies to NPV = {CF / (k - g)} - Cost; and when g=0, then NPV = {CF / k} - Cost
So, in our case, NPV = {4,500 / .12} - 35,000 =
$2,500
IRR =
12.86%
4%
Total Net CF
(35,000)
4,000
4,160
4,326
PV of CF
(35,000.00)
3,571.43
3,316.33
3,079.45
g=
4
5
infinity
5,624
(1,125)
5,849
(1,170)
infinity
infinity
4,499
2,859.49
4,679
2,655.24
infinity
infinity
Problem simplifies to NPV = {CF / (k - g)} - Cost; because savings and add'l outflows growing at 4%.
So, in our case, NPV = {4,000 / (.12 - .04)} - 35,000 =
0
(75,000)
(50,000)
(125,000)
(1,000)
k=
1
44,000
23,000
70,000
12,000
15%
2
###
###
###
13,000
$15,000
IRR =
15.43%
3
44,000
23,000
70,000
14,000
NPV
$25,462
$2,514
$34,826
$28,470
IRR
34.6%
18.0%
31.2%
1207.6%
Choose the option that has the highest NPV (Build New Stand), NOT the highest IRR!
$ 100,000
1,000 shares.
10%
($584)
Err:523
(in $ mil.)
Total Net CF
(100)
(200)
(200)
(60)
(550)
70
70
70
70
(70)
420
(480)
PV of CF
(100.00)
(181.82)
(165.29)
(45.08)
(375.66)
43.46
39.51
35.92
32.66
(29.69)
161.93
(584)
check:
(584.05)
MIRR=
Payback=
-0.98%
10 + years
(in $ mil.)
Total Net CF
(100)
(200)
(200)
(625)
175
175
175
175
(25)
600
150
PV of CF
(100.00)
(181.82)
(165.29)
(426.88)
108.66
98.78
89.80
81.64
(10.60)
231.33
(274)
check:
(274.38)
CF's presented below assume production of 420 planes and Production Costs = 12M / plane:
k=
10%
Production
(in $ mil.)
Year
Time
Investment
Costs
Revenues
Total Net CF
1967
0
(100)
(100)
1968
1
(200)
(200)
1969
2
(200)
(200)
1970
3
(200)
280
80
1971
4
(200)
(840)
280
(760)
1972
5
(840)
1,120
280
1973
6
(840)
1,120
280
1974
7
(840)
1,120
280
1975
8
(840)
1,120
280
1976
9
(840)
840
1977
10
840
840
Undiscounted Totals:
(900)
(5,040)
6,720
780
PV of CF
(100.00)
(181.82)
(165.29)
60.11
(519.09)
173.86
158.05
143.68
130.62
323.86
24
NPV=
IRR=
MIRR=
Payback=
NPV=
IRR=
MIRR=
Payback=
($274)
2.38%
5.99%
9 + years
$24
check:
23.98
10.58%
10.27%
9 + years
So, Break-Even Point appears to be around 420 planes (which is more than total world market of 323!!).
Interestingly, decision to launch project in 1967 was disastrous, but things looked better in 1970:
k=
10%
Production
(in $ mil.)
Year
Time
Investment
Costs
Revenues
Total Net CF
PV of CF
1970
0
140
140
140.00
1971
1
(200)
(490)
140
(550)
(500.00)
1972
2
(490)
560
70
57.85
1973
3
(490)
560
70
52.59
1974
4
(490)
560
70
47.81
1975
5
(490)
560
70
43.46
1976
6
(490)
420
(70)
(39.51)
1977
7
420
420
215.53
Undiscounted Totals:
(200)
(2,940)
3,360
220
18
NPV=
IRR=
MIRR=
Payback=
18
check:
11.42%
10.51%
#N/A + years
Thus, Lockheed was correct in pushing for loan guarantees from govt. once prior sunk costs ignored!!
17.73