Heating and Cooling Generation and Distribution Systems: Central Vs Decentralized Systems
Heating and Cooling Generation and Distribution Systems: Central Vs Decentralized Systems
Heating and Cooling Generation and Distribution Systems: Central Vs Decentralized Systems
Scot Duncan
Retrofit Originality Incorporated, USA
When not proven otherwise, central plants shall be designed for combined heat and power
(CHP) generation or tri-generation (heating, cooling and power generation), which has an
enormous potential for increased thermal efficiency, fuel reliability and reduced environmental
impacts.
Central plants with multiple cooling units are preferred, to permit loss of the largest unit while
maintaining at least 65% design capacity. Where the master plan calls for multiple buildings in an area,
in the design provide for future expansion of the central plant. Water cooled compressors are preferred
over air cooled systems and when feasible rejected heat shall be utilized.
Heating Systems
With utility modernization projects, existing heating systems currently using steam as a heating media
shall be converted to variable-temperature-variable-flow medium (<270oF) or low temperature (<190oF)
hot water. Thus reducing operation and maintenance costs, and allowing the use of less expensive,
more efficient piping material. Systems with condensing boilers are to be designed with lower operating
return hot water temperatures, i.e. <55 C (130 F), and use hot water reset to take advantage of the
higher efficiencies of condensing boilers.
Steam needs shall be evaluated and, when absolutely necessary, provided by local steam
boilers. Use onboard steam generators on equipment requiring steam or a small steam boiler
just for the year-round steam load. Hot water system experience fewer problems related to
expansion and contraction, have fewer corrosion problems, and are much easier to control, all
of which result in low maintenance costs. Use boiler with the thermal efficiency 90% Et.
Solar-assisted systems shall be considered as alternatives or to compliment conventional
boiler systems.
Conversion of steam systems may require some changes in the pipe distribution and new
requirements for heat exchange equipment at the customer interface and in the central heating
plant. In new construction and steam to hot water conversion projects, a so-called indirect
compact substation shall be used. Figure 1 shows an example of the building interface
installation:
Both the DH control for the secondary side (a) and the control valve (b) adjust the secondary system
flow according to the outside air temperature.
Furthermore, the control valve is used to program a time-dependent adjustment, e.g., the day/night
shift, the so called night-time heating reduction.
The differential pressure control, flow rate control (c), is used to control the flow rate. Therefore, a
certain flow rate limitation is fixed while the differential pressure is variable. When the differential
pressure increases, the controller shuts according to its setpoint; similarly when the differential pressure
decreases, the controller opens.
The heat meter (d) is used both for billing and to control the flow rate. Typically, at OCONUS
installations, the utility owns the heat meter while the customer owns the compact station.
The plate heat exchanger (e) is shall be specified to decouple the primary DH distribution system from
the secondary building side. This is important since the secondary building piping cannot bear up the
relative high temperatures and pressures of the primary DH side.
Hot water in the building can be supplied either to radiators or to coils of the air heating systems. An
2
admix control reduces the flow temperature in the secondary loop according to the ambient
temperature. The secondary loop can handle different control programs, e.g., for weekend or nighttime
heating reduction.
With the central heating system, domestic hot water preparation is also an admix operation controlled
by the DH control unit for the secondary loop (e). In this loop, the lowest temperature is limited by
hygienic conditions. Thus, the lowest flow temperature in the DH system is limited to 160 F (70 C)
since the domestic hot water must have a temperature higher than 140F (60 C). The flow temperature
must periodically be raised to 175F (80 C) to boost the domestic hot water to 160 F (70 C) (the
required temperature to kill legionella) for thermal disinfection.
Pipes for Hot Water Distribution Systems. Pre-insulated bounded pipes (Figure 2) shall be used for
both medium and low temperature hot water systems. These pipes consist of a steel medium pipe and
a plastic (i.e., polyethylene) jacket pipe. The insulation between the two pipes is made from a
polyurethane (PUR) heat insulation foam. The pipes are pre-insulated in the factory and the PUR foam
is a rigid material that bonds the outer jacket with the internal (medium) pipe. Because of the adverse
consequences to the energy efficiency and pipe integrity of leaks, the pipes will include an integral leak
detection and location system.
Using these pipes will reduce the number of manholes and the size of the manholes which are currently
about 1515 ft. In addition, the manholes can be covered by an iron cap. Currently the existing
manholes are open due to ventilation requirements. Thus surface water and rain can easily flood the
manholes and reduce the lifetime of the pipes due to external corrosion.
Figure 2. Photo of pre-insulated bounded pipes (pipe on the left is unused and is equipped with a leak
detection system; pipe on the right was in use for about 30 years in a DH system with sliding flow
temperatures [about 80 C/130 C]).
The most important limitation of the pipe is its maximum temperature restriction of 285 F, which
minimizes the aging of the PUR foam caused by exposure to the high temperatures.
The pipes are buried in frost-free depth in an open trench (Figure 3). After the laying of the pipe with a
length of some 15 to 30 ft, the single pipes are connected through welding. Those weld joins are tested
with radiation and evacuation tests. Afterwards, the PE jacket pipes are connected with shrinking
bushings. Finally, the space between the medium pipe and bushings is foamed in place. Figure 4
shows different precast fittings, elbows and branches. Finally, the trench is filled with sand and
compressed to bury the pipes. When the pipes are completely buried, the trench is further filled and
prepared for the desired surface, which may be a street, pathway or grassland.
It is absolutely critical that QC and QA be provided during the pipe installation to ensure the proper
installation. Key issues are the welding quality, bevel seams, the bushings and the foaming in back, the
sand bed, the proper connection of the leak detection system and the expansion cushions.
4
COOLING SYSTEMS
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 provides mandatory efficiency requirements for cooling equipment
(section 6.8). Equipment must meet or exceed the seasonal energy efficiency ratio (SEER) or energy
efficiency ratio (EER) for the required capacity. The cooling equipment should also meet or exceed the
integrated part-load value (IPLV) where applicable. However, requirements to use in Federal Buildings
only Energy Star or FEMP designated products are considerably more stringent than Standard 90.12007 (http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/procurement/eep_requirements.html)
For central refrigeration air-conditioning systems, provide freeze protection for all exposed piping and
components for outdoor packaged chiller units.
Air handling units of the single zone building cooling systems in hot and humid climates (zones 1a, 2a,
and 3a) shall be designed with a reheat coil to ensure that the supply air temperature is above the dew
point. Variable temperature chilled water single zone units are also not acceptable without a reheat coil.
Use the following chilled water systems design and retrofit guidance to achieve better
performance and energy efficiency.
1. Use Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) for the Primary Chilled Water pumps above 5 HP
2. A VFD allows the equipment speed to be controlled to match the need of the loads it serves, rather than
running at full speed any time it is running. Installation of VFDs on the primary chilled water pumps will
allow the speed of the pumps to be varied in response to changes in the cooling loads and chilled water
system temperature differentials. Since the power demand of the primary chilled water pump motor
varies approximately to the 2.5 power with speed (it is not quite a cubic relationship in the installed world),
reducing the pump speed to 70% when the chiller load is around 70% will result in a primary chilled water
pump energy savings of approximately 55% to 60%. At low loads, reducing the speed to 50% when the
chiller load is around 40% or less will result in a primary chilled water pump energy savings of
approximately 80%. Since the chillers spend the majority of their time operating below 70% of their
design cooling capacity, the system energy savings can be substantial.
3. Use Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) for the Condenser Water Pumps
A VFD allows the equipment speed to be controlled to match the need of the loads it serves, rather
than running at full speed any time it is running.
Installation of VFDs on the condenser water pumps will allow the speed of the pumps to be varied in
response to changes in the cooling loads. Since the power demand of the condenser water pump motor
varies approximately to the second power with speed, (due to the fixed minimum lift conditions of an
atmospheric cooling tower, the savings does not correspond to a cubic relationship) reducing the speed
to 70% when the chiller load is around 70% will result in a condenser water pump energy savings of
approximately 50%. At low loads, reducing the speed to 50% when the chiller load is around 50% or
less will result in a condenser water pump energy savings of approximately 75%. We typically do not
recommend taking the condenser water pump speed down below approximately 50%, as the savings
are minimal below that level, and we need to pay attention to the minimum allowable flow rate over the
cooling towers, which is typically in the 50% of design flow range.
The pump energy savings ratio for the condenser water pump is slightly different than it is for the
primary chilled water pumps, as the condenser water pumps have a fixed minimum lift required to move
water up over the top of the cooling towers, and there is no static regain for water falling through a
cooling tower as there is with primary chilled water pumps operating in a closed loop. Since the chillers
spend the majority of their time operating below 70% of their design cooling capacity, the system
energy savings can be substantial.
4. Cooling Load Based Optimization. Cooling load based optimization strategies should be incorporated
into the control routines for the CHWS temperature set-point, the chilled water differential pressure
setpoint and the condenser water temperature setpoint (for water cooled equipment) to reduce chiller and
pumping system energy waste, while improving the control system response at the cooling loads. The
load based optimization strategies should also incorporate chiller staging routines that take best
advantage of the installed equipment. Self tuning loops should be incorporated that will adjust the system
to accommodate continuous changes in the load and weather.
One such system which incorporates these concepts is the Load Based Optimization System (LOBOS),
which takes data from the air handling units that are controlled from the same DDC control system as
the chiller plant, and uses this data to raise the chilled water supply temperature as high as possible, to
save chiller energy, while lowering the chilled water system differential pressure as low as possible, to
save pumping system energy.
These resets are accomplished while still maintaining the required supply air temperatures at the air
handling units feedback from the cooling loads is required for best system performance.
The system also resets the condenser water supply temperature setpoint to reduce chiller energy by
lowering the condensing pressure of the refrigerant, without wasting cooling tower fan energy.
Increasing the chilled water supply temperature (within reason, comfort and humidity control limitations)
can reduce energy consumption on constant speed centrifugal chillers by up to 20%, and by up to 40%
or more on variable speed centrifugal chillers.
6
Reducing the chilled water system differential pressure (within reason, comfort and humidity control
limitations) can reduce energy consumption on variable speed chilled water pumping systems by up to
50% at light loads.
Differential pressure is what forces cold water from the chiller plant through the chilled water distribution
piping system to the air conditioning systems to provide cooling to the end use loads. A system does
not need the same differential pressure when it is 70F and dry outside as it does when it is 90F and
raining outside.
A reset strategy based on the needs of the end use loads can reduce pump energy by 40% or more,
depending upon the diversity of the loads.
Efficiency and load based reset strategies should be incorporated into the control routines for the
cooling towers. Reducing the condenser water supply temperature (within reason and equipment
limitations) can reduce energy consumption on constant speed centrifugal chillers by up to 30%, and by
up to 60% or more on variable speed centrifugal chillers.
An additional benefit associated with resetting the chilled water supply temperature and differential
pressure is that cooling coil control valve response and thus system temperature control are much
better when these strategies are incorporated.
When cooling loads are light but the differential pressure setpoint is at 40 PSID, and the CHW supply
temperature is at 42F, most of the cooling coil control valves will be operating at or near shutoff.
Valves operating near shut off provide very imprecise temperature control, resulting in large swings in
the leaving air temperature from the air handling units, and over- and under-dehumidification. If the
CHW supply temperature is increased and the differential pressure is decreased, the valves will open
up and operate closer to mid-stroke or even further open, where their control can be very accurate.
Figure 5 shows the trend of supply air temperature vs. supply air temperature setpoint
Figure 5. Supply air temperature vs. supply air temperature setpoint. Red =
Supply air temperature, Green = Supply air temperature setpoint
During the day, the CHWS temperature setpoint and differential pressure setpoint are reset based on
the loads. At approximately 19:00, the system is operated in a fixed temperature and DP setpoint
mode. It can be seen that the supply air temperature control stays within approximately 0.5F until
19:00, when the swings exceed 5F, due to the CHW control valve at the AHU being near shut off.
7
Optimized chiller equipment staging can reduce the energy consumption penalty imposed by running
too much constant speed equipment by over 50%.
Figure 6 shows an example of Load Based Optimization System (LOBOS) reset strategies in operation.
Temp
Scale
kW/ton
Scale
Figure 6. Results of a test run to see what effects changing the condenser
water temperature setpoint would have on VFD chiller system efficiency.
The red line is the condenser water temperature with a system using the Load Based Optimization
System (LOBOS) control system, which determines less wasteful, more efficient operating points
for the HVAC system based on the actual cooling loads of the facility.
The blue line is the chiller efficiency in kW per ton.
The green line is the chilled water supply temperature.
The test shown in the trend log screen shot, shows that the chiller energy efficiency is running at
approximately 0.33 kW per ton, prior to the start of the test.
This is excellent efficiency, as most chillers installed today operate between 0.60 and 1.5 kW per
ton of cooling.
With LOBOS, the condenser water temperature is running at approximately 68F, while the chilled
water temperature is running at approximately 50F.
We manually raised the condenser water setpoint to 80F from the automatically controlled setpoint
of 68F to determine what effect a normal operating strategy would have on chiller system
performance. Many facilities routinely operate their condenser water systems at between 80F and
85F, which are the typical design points for chillers when they leave the chiller factory.
As can be seen, the chiller efficiency was made dramatically worse when the CDWS temperature
was raised by 12 degrees, increasing from 0.33 kW per ton to 0.45 kW per ton, using 36% more
energy to deliver the same amount of cooling. The chiller energy increased from 332 kW to 452 kW,
an increase of 120 kW. There was a savings in cooling tower energy of approximately 40 kW since
we raised the condenser water temperature setpoint, but the net effect on the system was an
increase of 80 kW, or approximately 21% more energy to provide the same level of cooling.
When the condenser water temperature was released back to LOBOS operating controls, the
efficiency was returned to the previously obtained levels.
This also shows that a facility can be designed with excellent cooling equipment, but if it is operated
and controlled in a normal manner, the efficiency can suffer in a rather dramatic fashion compared
to the potential efficiency.
Use High Efficiency Dehumidification Strategy. When air handling units are being replaced, or
where there is a need for dry, non-saturated supply air, the installation of High Efficiency
Dehumidification Systems, in either Dedicated Outdoor Air System (DOAS) or Variable Air Volume
(VAV) design iterations should be utilized.
Although the airside of the HVAC systems is not a direct chiller plant energy efficiency project, the
design and operation of the airside has a substantial impact on the performance of the chiller plant. The
chiller plant is operated to respond to the needs of the end uses, (the air handlers serving the occupied
spaces) so if the end use air handlers are inefficient at transferring heat due to their design or small
cooling coils, colder water and higher flow rates of chilled water will be required. This can create a very
inefficient cooling system, and can contribute directly to the Low Delta T Syndrome.
Air distribution systems that have normal designs and cooling coil sizes have a detrimental effect on
chiller plant performance.
For example, a cooling coil that requires 42F chilled water supply temperature and provides a 54F
return water temperature to meet cooling loads and provide adequate dehumidification will cause the
chiller plant to use 25% to 40% more energy than a cooling coil selected to provide the design supply
air temperature and the design dehumidification load with 50F chilled water supply and 70F chilled
water return will require. If a HEDS designed AHU is utilized, the chiller plant savings will increase by
another 25% or more.
When design dehumidification loads exist, there is typically the need for some form of reheat energy to
temper the air entering the spaces. Reheat energy typically comes from a new source of energy,
typically a boiler plant connected to steam or hot water sourced re heat coils, or electric strip reheat
coils.
Cold, saturated air entering a humid space can cause condensation to form on surfaces that it comes in
contact with, creating wet spots and all of the problems that go along with water on surfaces in
occupied areas, so some form of re-heat or a method to decrease the relative humidity of the air
entering the space is required.
10
For a system such as a DOAS design, or a VAV system serving a barracks facility, the design day
chiller plant and boiler plant energy savings associated with a HEDS system can be in excess of 50%
when compared to a typical design.
Entering Conditions
Leaving Conditions
% Design CFM
DB
WB
DB
Dewpoint
100%
78
65
65.1
55
75%
77
64.5
65.7
55
50%
76
64
67.2
55
25%
75
63
68.1
55
% Design CFM
100%
HEDS %
Energy
Savings
460013
219240
52%
75%
340795
148330
56%
50%
227500
81250
64%
25%
108160
30400
72%
11
Entering Conditions
CHWS
Temperature
at Unit
45F
Leaving Conditions
DB
WB
DB
Dewpoint
98
82
65
45
CHWS
Temperature
at Unit
45F
1561813
HEDS %
Energy
Savings
28%
1126150
12
A design standard should be developed with substantial input from the operating staff, and from Subject
Matter Experts familiar with dehumidification and control system design and function in the field.
Once implemented, the savings associated with standardized system designs and installations will
result in millions of dollars per year in avoided energy, maintenance and biological remediation costs.
A design standard will also lessen the costs to perform system design and engineering reviews, as
standardized designs will be able to be utilized by the local design engineering firms.
This will have the added benefit of educating these firms for work in the private sector, allowing their
clients to reduce the lifecycle costs of their facilities, and helping America to reduce energy waste and
remain competitive with other nations.
14
Typical Design
Draw Thru 6 Row 550 FPM
Near-Optimal Design
Blow Thru 8 Row 350 FPM
77F
64.8F
77F
64.8F
52.5F
51.5F
55
45
54
9
77F
64.8F
79.5F
66F
55F
54F
55
45
69.2
24.2
169%
8
-21%
0.64
-49%
24.4
-65%
296000
-6%
10.1
1.26
70
315000
15