Process Costing Tutorial
Process Costing Tutorial
Process Costing Tutorial
1
PROCESS COSTING
Unit Structure
1.0 Learning Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Meaning of process costing
1.3 Distinction between job costing and process costing
1.4 Costing Procedure
1.5 Solved illustrations
1.6 Valuation of Work-in-progress
1.7 Questions
1.8 Exercise
1.1
INTRODUCTION:
1.2
2
cost per unit of product is ascertained at each stage of production
by dividing the cost of each process by the normal output of that
process.
1.2.1 Definition:
CIMA London defines process costing as that form of
operation costing which applies where standardize goods are
produced
1.2.2 Features of Process Costing:
(a) The production is continuous
(b) The product is homogeneous
(c) The process is standardized
(d) Output of one process become raw material of another process
(e) The output of the last process is transferred to finished stock
(f) Costs are collected process-wise
(g) Both direct and indirect costs are accumulated in each process
(h) If there is a stock of semi-finished goods, it is expressed in
terms of equalent units
(i) The total cost of each process is divided by the normal output of
that process to find out cost per unit of that process.
1.2.3 Advantages of process costing:
1. Costs are be computed periodically at the end of a particular
period
2. It is simple and involves less clerical work that job costing
3. It is easy to allocate the expenses to processes in order to have
accurate costs.
4. Use of standard costing systems in very effective in process
costing situations.
5. Process costing helps in preparation of tender, quotations
6. Since cost data is available for each process, operation and
department, good managerial control is possible.
1.2.4 Limitations:
1. Cost obtained at each process is only historical cost and are not
very useful for effective control.
2. Process costing is based on average cost method, which is not
that suitable for performance analysis, evaluation and
managerial control.
3. Work-in-progress is generally done on estimated basis which
leads to inaccuracy in total cost calculations.
4. The computation of average cost is more difficult in those cases
where more than one type of products is manufactured and a
division of the cost element is necessary.
5. Where different products arise in the same process and
common costs are prorated to various costs units. Such
individual products costs may be taken as only approximation
and hence not reliable.
3. Cost determination
4. Cost calculations
5. Control
Proper
control
is
comparatively difficult
as each product unit is
different
and
the
production
is
not
continuous.
There is usually not
transfer from one job
to another
unless
there is some surplus
work.
There may or may not
be work-in-progress.
6. Transfer
7. Work-in-Progress
8. Suitability
Suitable
to industries
where production
is
intermittent
and
customer orders can
be identified in the
value of production.
Process costing
Production is
contentious
Product
is
homogeneous
and
standardized.
Costs are complied for
each
process
for
department on
time
basis i.e. for a given
accounting period.
Cost is calculated at
the end of the cost
period.
Proper
control
is
comparatively
easier
as the production is
standardized and
is
more suitable.
The output of
one
process
is transferred
to another process as
input.
There is always some
work-in-progress
because of continuous
production.
Suitable, where goods
are made for stock and
productions
is
continuous.
Process I A/c.
Particulars
To Basic Material
To Direct Material
To Direct Wages
To Direct Expenses
ToProduction
Overheads
ToCost
Rectification
Normal Defects
Units Rs.
Particulars
xxx
xx By Normal Loss
xx By Abnormal Loss
xx By Process II A/c.
xx (output
transferred to
xx Next process)
of
of
xx
To Abnormal Gains
xx
xx
xxx
By Process I
Stock A/c.
Cr.
Units
xx
xx
xx
Rs.
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
5
1.4.4 Process Losses:
In many process, some loss is inevitable. Certain production
techniques are of such a nature that some loss is inherent to the
production. Wastages of material, evaporation of material is un
avoidable in some process. But sometimes the Losses are also
occurring due to negligence of Labourer, poor quality raw material,
poor technology etc. These are normally called as avoidable
losses. Basically process losses are classified into two categories
(a) Normal Loss (b) Abnormal Loss
1. Normal Loss:
Normal loss is an unavoidable loss which occurs due to the
inherent nature of the materials and production process under
normal conditions. It is normally estimated on the basis of past
experience of the industry. It may be in the form of normal wastage,
normal scrap, normal spoilage, and normal defectiveness. It may
occur at any time of the process.
No of units of normal loss: Input x Expected percentage of
Normal Loss.
The cost of normal loss is a process. If the normal loss units
can be sold as a crap then the sale value is credited with process
account. If some rectification is required before the sale of the
normal loss, then debit that cost in the process account. After
adjusting the normal loss the cost per unit is calculates with the
help of the following formula:
Cost of good unit:
Total cost increased Sale Value of Scrap
Input Normal Loss units
2. Abnormal Loss:
Any loss caused by unexpected abnormal conditions such
as plant breakdown, substandard material, carelessness, accident
etc. such losses are in excess of pre-determined normal losses.
This loss is basically avoidable. Thus abnormal losses arrive when
actual losses are more than expected losses. The units of abnormal
losses in calculated as under:
Abnormal Losses = Actual Loss Normal Loss
The value of abnormal loss is done with the help of following
formula:
Value of Abnormal Loss:
Total Cost increase Scrap Value of normal Loss x Units of abnormal loss
Input units Normal Loss Units
6
Abnormal Process loss should not be allowed to affect the
cost of production as it is caused by abnormal (or) unexpected
conditions. Such loss representing the cost of materials, labour and
overhead charges called abnormal loss account. The sales value of
the abnormal loss is credited to Abnormal Loss Account and the
balance is written off to costing P & L A/c.
Dr.
Particulars
To Process A/c.
Cr.
Units
xx
xx
Rs.
xx
xx
xx
xx
3. Abnormal Gains:
The margin allowed for normal loss is an estimate (i.e. on
the basis of expectation in process industries in normal conditions)
and slight differences are bound to occur between the actual output
of a process and that anticipates. This difference may be positive or
negative. If it is negative it is called ad abnormal Loss and if it is
positive it is Abnormal gain i.e. if the actual loss is less than the
normal loss then it is called as abnormal gain. The value of the
abnormal gain calculated in the similar manner of abnormal loss.
The formula used for abnormal gain is:
Abnormal Gain
Total Cost incurred Scrap Value of Normal Loss x Abnormal Gain Unites
Input units Normal Loss Units
xx
xx
xx
Cr.
Units
xx
Rs.
xx
xx
xx
Solution :
Dr.
Process I
Particulars
ToRawmaterial
@ 20
To
Direct
Material
To Direct Wages
To Production
Overheads
A/c.
Units
Rs.
Particulars
1000 20000 By Normal Loss
4200
(5%
on
1000)
6000 By
Abnormal
Loss A/c.
BY Process II
A/c.
6000 (output
1000 36200 transferred)
Cr.
Units
50
Rs.
400
50
900
1000 36200
8
Dr.
Particulars
To Process I
A/c.
Units Rs.
50
Cr.
Particulars
By Bank A/c.
Units
50
Rs.
400
50
400
By Costing P & L
A/c.
50
Dr.
Particulars
To Process I
A/c.
Units
50
Rs.
Particulars
400 BY Bank
Cr.
Units
50
Rs.
400
Working Notes:
(1) Cost of abnormal Loss :
= Total Cost increased Sales value of Scrap x abnormal units
Input units Normal Loss Units
= 36200 400 x 50
1000 50
(2) It has been assumed that units of abnormal loss have also been
sold at the same rate i.e. of Normal Scrap
Illustration 2: (Normal / Abnormal Loss and Abnormal Gain)
The product of a company passes through 3 distinct
process. The following information is obtained from the accounts for
the month ending January 31, 2008.
Particulars
Process A
Process B
Process C
Direct Material
7800
5940
8886
Direct Wages
6000
9000
12000
Production Overheads
6000
9000
12000
9
The following additional data is obtained :
Process
Output
Percentage of
Normal Loss to
Input
(Rs.)
Process I
2850
5%
Process II
2520
10 %
Process III
2250
15 %
Process A A/c.
Particulars
Units
To
Units 3000
introduced
To
Direct
Material
To Direct Wages
To Production
Overheads
Dr.
Rs.
Particulars
9000 By Normal Loss
A/c.
7800 By Process B
A/c.
6000
(Units
transferred
@ Rs. 10/-)
6000
3000 28800
Cr.
Units
150
2850 28500
3000 28800
Process B A/c.
Particulars
Units
Rs.
Particulars
To
Process I 2850 28500 By Normal Loss
A/c.
A/c.
To
Direct
5940 By
Abnormal
Material
Loss A/c.
To Direct Wages
9000 By Process C
A/c.
To Production
Overheads
9000
2850 52440
Rs.
300
Cr.
Units
285
Rs.
1140
45
9000
2520 50400
2850 52440
10
Dr.
Particulars
To Process II
A/c.
To
Direct
Material A/c
To Direct Wages
To Production
Overheads
To
Abnormal
Gain A/c.
Process C A/c.
Units
Rs.
Particulars
2520 50400 By Normal Loss
A/c.
8886 By
Finished
Stock A/c.
12000
108
Units
378
2250 85500
2628 87390
Particulars
Units
To Normal Loss
108
A/c.
To Costing P&L
A/c.
108
Dr.
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
Units
540 By Process C
108
A/c.
3564
Rs.
4104
4104
4104
108
Particulars
Units
To Process A
150
A/c.
To Process B
285
A/c.
To Process C
378
A/c.
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
Units
300 By Bank
A/c.
(Sales)
1140 Process A
150
A/c.
1890 Process B A/c.
285
Process C
A/c.
By
Abnormal
Gain A/c.
813
Rs.
1890
12000
4104
2628 87390
Dr.
Cr.
3330
Rs.
300
1140
270
1350
108
540
813
3330
11
whether the particular process is making profit (or) loss. This will
help the management whether to process the product or to buy the
product from the market. If the transfer price is higher than the cost
price then the process account will show a profit. The complexity
brought into the accounting arises from the fact that the inter
process profits introduced remain a part of the prices of process
stocks, finished stocks and work-in-progress. The balance cannot
show the stock with profit. To avoid the complication a provision
must be created to reduce the stock at actual cost prices. This
problem arises only in respect of stock on hand at the end of the
period because goods sold must have realized the internal profits.
The unrealized profit in the closing stock is eliminated by creating a
stock reserve. The amount of stock reserve is calculated by the
following formula.
Stock Reserve = Transfer Value of stock x Profit included in transfer price
Transfer Price
Illustration 3 :
A product passes through three processes before its
completion. The output of each process s charged to the next
process at a price calculated to give a profit of 20% on transfer
price. The output of Process III is transferred to finished stock
account on a similar basis. There was no work-in-progress at the
beginning of the years. Stock in each process has been valued at
prime cost of the process. The following data is available at the end
st
of 31 March, 2009.
Process Process
I
II
Direct Material
Direct Wages
Stock on 31st March
2009
Sale during the year
Process
III
20000
30000
10000
30000
20000
20000
10000
40000
30000
Finished
Stock
Rs.
--15000
--
--
--
180000
12
Solution:
Dr.
Process I A/c.
Particulars
To Materials
To Wages
Total
Les Closing
Stock c/d
Prime Cost
To Gross
Profit
(20% on
Transfer
Price)
ToStockB/d.
Total
Rs.
20000
Cost
Rs.
20000
30000
50000
30000
50000
10000
40000
10000
40000
Total
Cost
Rs.
Rs.
50000 40000
Profit
Rs.
10000
50000 40000
10000
---
10000
-- 10000
50000
10000
40000 10000
10000
--
Dr.
Process II A/c.
Particulars
To Process
I A/c.
To Material
To Wages
Less
:
Closing
Stock
C/d.
Prime Cost
To
Gross
Profit
(20% on
Transfer
Price)
To
B/d.
Profit Particulars
Rs.
-- By Process
IIA/c.
(Transfer)
---
Cr.
Stock
Total
Cost
Rs.
Rs.
50000 40000
Profit
Particulars
Rs.
10000 By
Process-III
A/c.
-(Transfer)
-10000
30000
20000
100000
30000
20000
90000
20000
18000
2000
80000
72000
8000
20000
--
20000
100000
20000
72000
18000
28000
2000
Cr.
Total
Rs.
Cost
Rs.
Profit
Rs.
100000
72000
28000
100000
72000
28000
13
Process III A/c
Particulars
ToprocessII
A/c
To Material
To Wages
TOTAL
Less.Closing
stock
To
Gross
profit
(20%of
transfer
price)
To Stock b/d
Total
Rs.
100000
Cost
Profit
Particulars
Rs.
Rs.
72000 28000 ByFinished
stock A/c
10000
40000
------122000 28000
10000
40000
150000
30000
24400
5600
120000
97600
22400
30000
--------
30000
150000
30000
97600
24000
52400
5600
Total
Cost
Rs.
Rs.
150000 97600
Profit
Rs.
52400
150000 97600
52400
Total
Rs.
To process 115000
III A/c
(-)Stock
15000
To
gross 135000
profit
45000
180000
To
Stock 15000
A/c
Cost
Rs.
97600
Profit
Rs.
52400
9760
87840
5240
92160
--87840
9760
45000
92160
5240
Particulars
By Sales
Total
Rs.
180000
Cost
Rs.
87840
Profit
Rs.
92160
180000
87840
92160
Process I
Process Ii
= No profit
=10000x20000=2000
100000
14
Illustration 4 :
A product process through three process A, B and C. The
details of expenses incurred on the three process during the year
2008 were as under :
Process
A
10000
Units introduced
Cost per unit is Rs. 50/Sundry Material
Labour
Direct Expenses
Selling price per unit of output
Process
B
Rs.
6000
18000
3000
70
Process
C
Rs.
9000
48000
11000
100
Rs.
3233
39000
18000
200
Process A A/c.
Units
10000
Rs.
Particulars
By Normal Loss
5,00,000 By Abnormal
6,000
Loss A/c.
18,000 By Process B
A/c.
3,000 By P & L A/c.
ToDirect
Expenses
Cr.
Units
500
Rs.
1,500
200
6,200
11063
342958
3,100
171479
(@ 55.32)
10000
5,27,000
5,27,000
15
Dr.
Process B A/c.
Particulars
Units
To Process
A 6200
A/c.
ToSundry
Materials
To Labour
To
Direct
Expenses
ToAbnormal
Gains
A/c. (@ 77.19)
6330
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
342958 By Normal Loss
9000 By Process
A/c.
48000 By P & L A/c.
11000
420980
Process C A/c.
Particulars
Units
To Process
B
A/c.
ToSundry
Materials
To Labour
To
Direct
Expenses
Rs.
Particulars
208165 By Normal Loss
Dr.
Particulars
To Process A
A/c.
To Process B
A/c.
To Process C
A/c.
To
Management
Expenses A/c.
ToSelling
Expenses
To
Abnormal
Loss A/c.
To Net Profit
Rs.
4650
2700
2,08,165
2700
2,08,165
6,330
4,20,980
100221
Dr.
2700
Units
930
Cr.
3233 By
Abnormal
Loss
39000 By P & L A/c.
18000
( @ 12.76)
268398
Units
540
Rs.
5400
60
7305
2100
255693
2700
268398
Cr.
Units
3100
Rs.
Particulars
171479 By Sales( @ Rs. 70)
Units
3100
Rs.
217000
2700
2700
270000
2700
265693 BySales(@Rs.2000)
2700
420000
80000 BY Abnormal
A/c.
Gain
9372
50000
17168
133867
916372
916372
16
Dr.
Particulars
To Process A A/c.
To Process B A/c.
260
Dr.
Particulars
To Normal Loss
A/c.
To Costing P & L
A/c.
Rs.
Particulars
11063 By Bank Sales
7305
(@ Rs. 30)
By Bank
(@ Rs. 10)
By P & L A/c.
18368
Cr.
Units
200
600
60
600
17168
18368
260
Rs.
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
650 By Process B /c.
Units
130
Rs.
10022
130
10022
9372
130
10022
Illustration 5
Mahesh Ltd process a material which passes through three
processes. Figures relating to production for the first 6 months of
2009 are as follows.
Process
A
Process
B
Process
C
1000 tones @
Rs. 200
Rs. 40000
Rs. 32500
50 tones
Rs. 30000
Rs. 10800
30 tones
Rs. 7000
Rs. 3710
51 tones
Rs. 320
5%
Rs. 450
10%
Rs. 800
20%
17
Solution
Dr.
Particulars
To Material
@
Rs. 200
To Wages
To Expenses
1000
Dr.
Particulars
To Process I A/c.
To Costing Profit
& Loss A/c.
Particulars
To
Process
1
Stock A/c.
To wages
To Expenses
Units
900
Particulars
To Process 2 A/c.
ToCosting
P&L
A/c.
272500
Units
50
Units
600
1000 272500
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
270000 By Bank (@ 320)
6000 ByProcessNo.2
A/c.
276000
Units
300
600
Rs.
96000
180000
900
276000
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
180000 By Normal Loss
(@ Rs. 50)
30000
10800 By Wight Loss
By Process
2
Stock
A/c(@ Rs. 430)
220800
Units
30
Rs.
1500
60
--
510
600
219300
220800
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
219300 By Bank
5100 (sale @ 450)
By Process
A/c.
510
244400
Rs.
2500
50
-900 270000
600
Dr.
Rs.
Particulars
200000 By Normal Loss
(sale of Scrap)
40000 By Weight Loss
32500 By Process I Stock
A/c.(@300per tone)
900
Dr.
Cr.
Units
Rs.
255
114750
255
109650
510
244400
18
Dr.
Particulars
To Process 2
Stock A/c.
To wages
To Expenses
255
Rs.
Particulars
109650 By scrap
7000 By Weight Loss
3710 By Process 3
stock A/c
120360
Dr.
Particulars
To Process 3 A/c.
To Costing P & L
A/c.
Units
153
153
Dr.
Rs.
Particulars
117810 By Bank
4590 (sale @ 800)
122400
Cr.
Units
51
Rs.
2550
51
153
-117810
255
120360
Cr.
Units
153
122400
153
122400
Particulars
To Management Expenses
To Selling Expenses
To Interest on Capital
Rs.
Rs.
Particulars
10500 By Process 1 Stock A/c.
8000 By Process 2 Stock A/c.
2000 By Process 3 Stock A/c.
By Net Loss
20500
Cr.
Rs.
6000
5100
4590
4810
20500
19
Equivalent units of work in progress = Actual no. of units in progress x
Percentage of work completed
20
Situation I :
Only closing work-in-progress without process losses :
In this case, the existence of process loss is ignored. Closing
work-in-progress is converted into equivalent units on the basis of
estimates on degree of completion of materials, labour and
production overhead. Afterwards, the cost pr equivalent unit is
calculated and the same is used to value the finished output
transferred and the closing work-in-progress
Situation II:
When there is closing work-in-progress with process loss or
gain.
If there are process losses the treatment is same as already
discussed in this chapter. In case of normal loss nothing should be
added to equivalent production. If abnormal loss is there, it should
be considered as good units completed during the period. If units
scrapped (normal loss) have any reliable value, the amount should
be deducted from the cost of materials in the cost statement before
dividing by equivalent production units. Abnormal gain will be
deducted to obtain equivalent production.
Situation III:
Opening and closing work-in-progress without process
losses.
Since the production is a continuous activity there is
possibility of opening as well as closing work-in-progress. The
procedure of conversion of opening work-in-progress will vary
depending on the method of apportionment of cost followed viz,
FIFO, Average cost Method and LIFO.
Let us discuss the methods of valuation of work-in-progress one by
one.
(a) FIFO Method: The FIFO method of costing is based on the
assumption of that the opening work-in-progress units are
the first to be completed. Equivalent production of opening
work-in-progress can be calculated as follows:
Equivalent Production = Units of Opening WIP x Percentage of work
needed to finish
the units
21
new period and an average rate obtained. In calculating the
equivalent production opening units will not be shown
separately as units of work-in-progress but included in the
units completed and transferred.
(c) Weighted Average Cost Method: In this method no
distinction is made between completed units from opening
inventory and completed units from new production. All units
finished during the current accounting period are treated as if
they were started and finished during that period. The
weighted average cost per unit is determined by dividing the
total cost (opening work-in-progress cost + current cost) by
equivalent production.
(d) LIFO Method: In LIFO method the assumption is that the
units entering into the process is the last one first to be
completed. The cost of opening work-in-progress is charged
to the closing work-in-progress and thus the closing work-inprogress appears cost of opening work-in-progress. The
completed units are at their current cost.
(1) Format of statement of Equivalent Production :
Input
Particulars
Opening
Stock
Units
Introduced
Output
Units Particulars
xx
xx
xx
Units
Units
completed
Normal
Loss
Abnormal
Loss
Equivalent
Units
xx
xx
Material
% Units
xx
xx
--
--
Equivalent
Production
Labour
Overheads
% Units %
Units
xx
xx
--
--
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
Cost
Rs.
Equivalent
Units
Xx
Xx
Xx
xx
Xx
Xx
xx
Cost per
Equivalent
Units Rs
Xx
Xx
Xx
Xx
Xx
22
(3) Statement of Evaluation
Particulars
Element of
cost
Units completed
Closing WIP
Abnormal Loss
Equivalent
Units
Material
Labour
Overheads
Material
Labour
Overheads
Material
Labour
Overheads
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
Cost per
equivalent
units
Rs.
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
Cost
Rs.
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
Total
Cost
Rs.
Xx
Xx
Xx
50000 Units
Rs. 25000
Rs. 10000
Rs. 25000
2000000 Units
Rs. 100000
Rs. 75000
Rs. 70000
Output
Units
Particula
rs
Units
50,000 Produced
200,000 Closing
Stock
250000
Units
Equivalent Production
Material
%
Units
150000
100
150000
100
150000
100
150000
100000
100
100000
50
50000
40
40000
250000
250000
Labour
Units
200000
Overheads
%
Units
190000
23
Statement of Cost :
Element
Material
Labour
Overheads
Opening
cost
Rs.
25,000
10,000
25,000
60,000
Current
Total
Equivalent
cost
Cost
units
Rs.
Rs.
1,00,000 1,25,000 2,50,000
75,000
85,000 2,00,000
70,000
95,000 1,90,000
2,45,000 3,05,000
Cost
per
unit
0.500
0.425
0.500
1.425
Units
1. Units introduced
& 1,50,000
transferred
2. Closing work-in-progress
Material
1,00,000
Labour
50,000
Overheads
40,000
Dr.
Particulars
To Opening
Stock
To Materials
To Labour
To
Overheads
Cost per
unit
1.425
0.500
0.425
0.500
Cost
50,000
21,250
20,000
Total
cost
213750
91,250
3,05,000
Process I A/c.
Units
50,000
2,00,000
2,50,000
Cr.
Rs.
Particulars
60,000 By
Units
completed
1,00,000 & transfer
75,000 By Closing Stock
70,000
3,05,000
Units
Rs.
50,000
50,000
2,13,750
91,250
2,50,000
3,05,000
5000 units of
Rs. 36,000
2,13,000 units of
Rs. 8,27,000
Rs. 4,01,800
Rs. 1,98,100
Rs. 99,050
11,000 units
1,89,000 units
18,000 units
24
Degree of Completion :
Opening
Stock
Material
70 %
Labour
50 %
Overhead
50 %
Closing
Stock
80 %
60 %
60 %
Scrap
100 %
80 %
80 %
5,000
213,000
218000
Output
Particulars
Units
Normal
Loss
Op. Stock
Processed
Introduces &
Completed
Abnormal
Loss
Closing
Stock
Equivalent Production
Material
Labour
Overheads
%
Units
%
Units
%
Units
10000
5000
30
1500
50
2500
184000
100
184000
100
184000
100
184000
1000
100
1000
100
1000
80
800
18000
218000
100
18000
203000
80
14400
200900
60
10800
198100
Statement of Cost
Particulars
Cost
Rs.
Material I
Transfer
from
Previous 8,27,000
process
Less
Value of
scrap
15,000 8,12,000
(normal)
Material II
Aded+ in the process
4,01,800
Direct Wages
1,98,100
Overheads
99,050
Equivalent
Units
Rs.
Cost
Per
Unit
Rs.
2,03,000
4.00
2,00,900
1,98,100
1,98,100
2.00
1.00
0.50
7.50
25
Statement of Apportionment of Cost
Particulars
Op.
Processed
Elements
Stock
Units
introduced
and
Completed
Closing stock
Abnormal loss
Equivalent
Units
Cost
Per
Unit
Rs.
Cost
Rs.
Material I
--
--
Material II
Wages
Overheads
Material I
1,500
2,500
2,500
1,84,000
2.00
3,000
1.00
2,500
0.50
1,250
4.00 7,36,000
Material II
Wages
Overheads
Material I
Material II
Wages
Overheads
Material I
Material II
Wages
Overheads
1,84,000
1,84,000
1,84,000
18,000
14,400
10,800
10,800
1,000
1,000
800
800
2.00 3,68,000
1.00 1,84,000
0.50 92,000
4.00 72,000
2.00 28,800
1.00 10,800
0.50
5,400
4.00
4,000
2.00
2,000
1.00
800
0.50
400
TOTAL
Dr.
Particulars
To Balance
b/d.
To Process
II A/c.
To Materials
To Wages
To
Overheads
Total cost
Rs.
Rs.
Particulars
36,000 By Normal
Loss
8,27,000 By Process
IV A/c.
4,01,800 By
Abnormal
Loss
1,98,100 By Closing
Stock
99,050
2,18,000 15,61,950
6,750
13,80,000
13,86,750
1,17,000
7,200
15,10,950
Cr.
Units
10,000
Rs.
15,000
1,89,000
14,22,750
1,000
7,200
18,000
1,17,000
2,18,000
15,61,950
Note :
Cost of goods transferred to Process IV :
Value of Opening Stock
Cost incurred in this process for Opening Stock
Cost incurred for the units introduced & Processed
Total
36,000
6,750
13,80,000
14,22,750
26
Illustration 8
The following information is given in respect of Process
costing 10 : 3 for the month of January 2009.
Opening stock 2,000 units made up of
Direct Material I
Direct Material II
Direct Labour
Overheads
Rs.
12,350
13,200
17,500
11,000
Direct Material
Direct Labour
Overheads
Total
Units
Material I
Material II
%
Units
Labour
%
Units
Overheads
%
Units
17000
1800
100
--
17000
100
17000
100
17000
100
17000
800
4000
22000
100
100
800
4000
20200
100
80
800
3200
19400
100
60
800
2400
18600
100
40
800
1600
17800
27
Statement of Cost
Particulars
Cost
Rs.
Material I :
Opening balance 2000 units
Cost of 20000 units @ Rs. 6
Per unit
Equivalent
Units
Rate / Equivalent
Units
Rs.
12,350
Material II :
Opening Stock
In Process II
Labour :
Opening Labour
In Process II
Overheads :
Opening Stocks
In Process II
1,20,000
1,25,150
20,200
6.1955
13,200
30,000
43,200
19,400
2.2268
17,500
60,000
77,500
18,600
4.1667
11,000
60,000
71,000
17,800
3.9888
16.5778
Rs.
2,81,822
13,262
Dr.
Particulars
Units
To
Opening 2,000
WIP
To Process 2
20,000
To Direct
Material II
To
Direct
Labour
To Overheads
To
Abnormal
800
Gain
22,800
Rs.
Particulars
57,050 By Normal Loss
24,782
7,126
10,000
6,382
48,290
Cr.
Units
1,800
Rs.
7,200
17,000 2,81,822
4,000
48,290
60,000
13,262
3,37,312
22,800 3,37,312
28
Illustration.9
The finished product of a factory pass through two
processes : the entire material being placed in process at the
beginning of the first process. From the following production and
last data relating to the first process, work out the value of the
closing inventory and the value of the materials transferred to the
second process.
Process I
Opening inventory
Material
Labour
Manufacturing Overheads
Opening inventory (25 percent complete)
Put into Process
Transferred to II Process
Closing inventory (20 percent completed)
Spoilage during process
Rs.
10,000
27,500
50,000
40,000
4,000
12,000
10,000
5,000
1,000
[I.C.W.A., Final]
Solution :
Process I A/c
Particulars
Opening
Inventory
Material
Labour
Kg.
4,000
12,000
Manufacturing
Overheads
16,000
Amount Particulars
Rs.
10,000 Transferred
to Process II
27,500 Normal Loss
50,000 Closing
Inventory
40,000
1,27,500
Kg.
10,000
Amount
Rs.
1,15,750
1,000
5,000
-11,750
16,000
1,27,500
Working Note :
Statement of Equivalent Production Units
Particulars
Opening
Stock
Processed
Completely
Processed
Normal Loss
Closing Inventory
Output
Kg.
4,000
Material
Qty.
%
3,000
75
Labour
Qty.
%
3,000
75
Overheads
Qty.
%
3,000
75
6,000
6,000
100
6,000
100
6,000
100
1,000
5,000
16,000
-1,000
10,000
-20
-1,000
10,000
-20
-1,000
10,000
-20
29
Statement of Element of Cost on the basis of Equivalent
Production
Particulars
Cost Equivalent
Rs.
Units
27,500
10,000
50,000
10,000
40,000
10,000
Material
Labour
Overheads
Total
Op.
Stock
Processed
Completely
Processed
Closing
Inventory
Elements
Equivalent
Units
Material
3,000
Cost
Per
Unit
Rs.
2.75
Cost
Rs.
Labour
Overheads
Material
3,000
3,000
6,000
5.00
4.00
2.75
15,000
12,000
16,500
35,250
Labour
Overheads
Material
6,000
6,000
1,000
5.00
4.00
2.75
30,000
24,000
2,750
70,500
Labour
Overheads
1,000
1,000
5.00
4.00
5,000
4,000
8,250
TOTAL
Total
cost
Rs.
11,750
1,17,500
Rs.
10,000
35,250
70,500
1,15,750
Units
4,000
6,000
10,000
Illustration 10
ABC Limited manufactures a product 2X by using the process
normally R. T. for the month of May 2009, the following data is available.
30
Material Introduced
Transfer to next process
Work-in-Process
At the beginning of the month (4/5 completed)
At the end of the month (2/3 completed)
Cost records:
Work-n-Process at the beginning of the month
Material
Conversion cost
Cost during the month
Materials
Conversion cost
Process R. T.
16,000 units
14,000 units
4,000 units
3,000 units
Rs. 30,000
Rs. 29,200
Rs. 1,20,000
Rs. 1,60,800
Particulars
Output
Units
Equivalent Production
Materials
% completed
--
Conversion cost
Equivalent
Units
%
Complet
ed
Equivalent
Units
--
14,400
100
14,400
100
14,400
1,440
100
1,440
100
1,440
1,160
100
1,160
100
1,160
3,000
100
3,000
66.67
2,000
20000
20000
19000
31
Statement showing cost of each element
Particulars
Materials
Opening
Cost in process
Total
Equivalent Units
Cost per unit
(a)
(b)
(a b)
30,000
1,20,000
1,50,000
20,000
7.50
Conversion
cost
29,200
1,60,800
1,90,000
19,000
10.00
(Rs.)
14,400
14,400
1,440
7.50
10.00
17.50
1,08,000
1,44,000
3,000
2,000
7.50
10.00
22,500
20,000
42,500
1,160
1,160
7.50
10.00
8,700
11,600
20,300
Process A/c.
Rs.
Particulars
59,200 By Profit and Loss
A/c.
1,20,000
(abnormal)
1,60,800 By Transfer to Next
Process
By Closing WIP
340000
2,52,000
25,200
Cr.
Rs.
20,300
2,77,200
42,500
3,40,000
Illustration.11
GH & Co. manufactures a product. The process costing is
followed and work-in-progress stocks at the end of each month are
valued at FIFO basis.
At the beginning of the month of June, the inventory of work-inprogress showed 400 units, 40% complete, valued as follows:
32
Rs.
3,600
3,400
1,000
8,000
Material
Labour
Overheads
Total
Process A/c.
Rs.
Cr.
Particulars
Units
Particulars
To Opening
Stock
To Material
400
8,000 BY Transfer to
2,600
To Labour
79,800 By Work-in-
To Overheads
21,280 Progress
3000
1,77,580
Units
Rs.
2,500
1,56,094
500
21,486
3000
1,77,580
Working Note :
Statement of Equivalent Production (Units)
Input
Particulars
400 Opening
Stock
Completely
2600 Processed
Work-inProgress
3000
Outp
ut
400
Material
Qty.
%
240
60
Labour
Qty.
%
240
60
Overhead
Qty.
%
240
60
2,100
500
2,100
400
2,100
300
2,100
300
3,000
2,740
100
80
2,640
100
60
2,640
100
60
33
Working Note :
(1) For opening stock also equivalent production has been
calculated as it was partly complete and it has to be
converted into finished product in this period. They were
completed 60 % in this period.
(2) Total units produced in a month are 2,50 units. Out of this
400 units of opening stock has been deducted because they
have been partly processed in this particular month and we
have already calculated equivalent units of opening stock.
Only, 2,100 units have been introduced and completed in the
particular period.
(3) For closing stock also equivalent production in terms of total
units completed has been calculated.
Statement of Element of cost on the basis of Equivalent Units
Cost
Rs.
Material
Labour
Overheads
Equivalent
Units
68,500
79,800
21,280
2.740
2.640
2.640
Cost per
unit
Rs.
25.000
30.2273
8.0606
Equivalent
Cost
Details
Units
Per Unit
Rs.
Rs.
Material
240 25.0000 6,000
Total
Rs.
Labour
Overheads
Material
240
240
2,100
30.2273 7,255
8.0606 1,935
25.0000 52,500
15,190
Labour
Overheads
Material
2,100
2,100
400
30.2273 63,477
8.0606 16,927
25.0000 10,000
1,32,904
Labour
Overheads
300
300
30.2273
8.0606
9,068
2,418
TOTAL
21,486
1,69,580
Rs.
8,000
15,190
1,32,904
1,56,094
34
Illustration 12
The following data is available in respect of Process I for
February 1990.
(1) Opening stock of work-in-process 800 units at a
total cost of Rs. 4,000.
(2) Degree of completion of opening work in process
Materials
Labour
Overheads
(3) Input of materials at a total cost of Rs. 36,800 for
9,200 units
(4) Direct wages incurred Rs. 16,7540
(5) Production overheads Rs. 8,370
(6) Units scrapped 1,200 units. The stage of
completion of these units was
Materials
Labour
Overheads
(7) Closing work-in-process : 900 units. The stage of
completion of these units was :
Materials
Labour
Overheads
(8) 7,900 units were completed and transferred to the
next process.
(9) Normal Loss is 80 % of the total input (opening
stock plus units put in)
(10)Scrap value is Rs. 4 per unit
100 %
60 %
60 %
100 %
80 %
80 %
100 %
70 %
70 %
35
(a) Statement of Equivalent Production (FIFO Method)
input
Particulars
Output
Particulars
units
Equivalent
Material
Units
Units
Op. Stock
of
W.I.P.
Units
completed
800 Work on Op.
stock
New units
9,200 Closing stock
Units
Introduced
Normal Loss
Abnormal
Loss
10,000
800
--
7100
900
7100
900
800
400
-400
10,000
8,400
Labour &
Overheads
Units
%
320
40
100
100
7,100
630
100
70
100
-320
100
8,370
Cost
Rs.
Equivalent
Unit
Cost Per
Unit
36,800
3,200
33,600
16,740
8,370
8,400
8,370
8,370
4.00
2.00
1.00
Cost per
unit Rs.
Equivalent
unit
Total cost
Rs.
4.00
2.00
1.00
400
320
320
1,600
640
320
2,560
4.00
2.00
1.00
900
630
630
3,600
1,260
630
5,490
4,000
-2.00
1.00
-320
320
640
320
960
36
(iii) Cost of completing 7100 units
Material
Labour
Overheads
4.00
2.00
1.00
7100
7100
7100
Total (I + ii + iii)
Dr.
Particulars
To
Opening
WIP
To Materials
To Labour
To Overheads
Units
800
9200
--10000
Rs.
Particulars
4000 By
Finished
Goods
36800 By Closing WIP
16740 By Normal Loss
8370 By
Abnormal
Loss
65910
28400
14200
7100
49700
54600
Cr.
Units
7900
Rs.
54660
900
800
400
5490
3200
2560
10000
65910
1.8 EXERCISE
1.8.1 Objective type:
Answer in Brief
1. State any four features of process costing.
2. Define process costing,
3. What do you mean by normal loss ? How is it treated in
process cost accounts?
4. What do you mean by abnormal loss ? How is it treated in
process cost accounts?
5. Distinguish between normal loss and abnormal loss.
6. What do you mean by abnormal effective? How is it treated in
process cost accounts?
7. What do you mean by inter process profit? What purpose
does it serve?
8. What do you mean be equivalent production?
9. Name any four industries in which process costing is
applicable?
10. Enumerate any two advantages of process costing.
11. Enumerate any two disadvantages of process costing.
12. What do you meant by equivalent units?
37
Multiple Choice Questions
1.
The type of spoilage that should not affect the cost of
inventories is
(a) Abnormal spoilage
(c) Seasonal spoilage
(b) Normal spoilage
(d) Indirect spoilage
2.
3.
4.
(a)Custom production
(b) Standard costs
(c) FIFO
(d) LIFO
5.
6.
7.
38
8.
9.
10.
11.
The type of process loss that should not affect the cost of
inventory is
(a) Abnormal loss
(c) Seasonal loss
(b) normal loss
(d) standard loss
12.
13.
14.
(Answers: 1(a), 2 (d), 3 (b), 4(c), 5(a), 6(b), 7(a), 8(c), 9(a),
10(b).)11 (a), 12(c), 13 (c), 14(b) )
39
1.8.2 Short notes
1. Write a short note-Inter process profits.(Apr-08)
2. Write a Short Note-Treatment of losses in Process.(Apr 07)
3. Write a short Note-Equivalent Production. (Apr-07)
4. Describe the main features of process costing.
5. Explain the features of process costing
6. How would you treat abnormal gain ?
1.8.3. Long questions
2. What do you mean by inter-process profits in process cost
accounts.
3. Explain the methods to be adopted in the treatment of joint
products and by-products in process account.
4. What do you understand by `Normal and `Abnormal Wastage
during the process of manufacture?
5. Describe briefly the method known as Process Costing, stating
four types of manufactures which would be suitable for its
application. A description of the method of dealing with byproducts is not required.
6. Explain the concept of Equivalent Production. Discuss the two
methods of its valuation.
1.8.4 Practical Problems
Illustration 1:
During a particular period 2,000 units at a cost of ` 60,000 were
introduced into Process A (at the beginning). The normal loss was
estimated at 5% of the input. At the end, 1,400 units were produced
and transferred to the Process B, 460 units being partially
completed and 140 units scrapped. The partially completed units
had reached the following state of production:
Materials
100% complete
Labour
50% complete
Overheads
50% complete
Additional costs incurred during the process were:
Materials
Rs. 17,000
Labour
Rs.33, 400
Overheads
Rs. 16,700
The units scrapped realised Rs.10 per unit.
Prepare Process A A/c with all relevant statements.
(Ans.: Equivalent Units, Material: 1,900, Labour: 1670, Overheads: 1,670
Transfer to Process B 1,400 units @Rs. 70 p.u.)
(
40
Illustration 2 :
XYZ Ltd. is engaged in process industry. During the month August
2000, 2000 Units were introduced in process X. The normal loss
was estimated at 5% of input. At the end of the month 1,400 units
had been produced and transferred to process Y. 460 units were
incomplete and 140 units, after passing through fully the entire
process had to be scrapped. The incomplete units had reached the
following state of completion:
Materials
Labour
Overheads
75% Completed
50% Completed
50% Completed
Illustration 3 : (FIFO)
The following information is available for Process IV of Swastik
Fabrications Ltd. for the month of March 2005.
Opening Stock: 4,800 units @ Rs.16,500
Degree of Completion:
Material
70%
Labour
60%
Overheads
60%
Transfer from Process III: 30,600 units @ Rs. 30,600
Transfer to Process V:
27,600 units
Direct Material introduced in Process IV: ` 13,440
Direct Labour introduced in Process IV: ` 39,420
Production overheads incurred ` 52,560
Units scrapped: 2,400
Degree of completion:
Material
100%
Labour
70%
Overheads 70%
41
Closing stock 5400 units
Degree of completion:
Material
Labour
Overheads
60%
40%
40%
Illustration 4 : (FIFO)
The following data pertains to Process I for March 2003 of Beta
Limited :
Particulars
Opening Work-in-Progress
...
Degree of completion :
Materials 100%; Labour and
overheads 33%
Input of Materials
...
Direct Labour
...
Overheads
...
Closing Work-in-Progress
...
Units
1,500
Rs.
15,000
18,500 52,000
14,000
28,000
5,000
42
Assume:
i) FIFO Method is used by the Company.
ii) The cost of opening work-in-progress is fully transferred to the
next process.
Ans. (Equivalent Units, Material: 16000, Labour:14,000, Overheads: 14,000)
2,000
7,500
3,000
1,500
8,000
Illustration 6 : (Average)
Shete and Shete Pvt. Ltd. gives the following particulars relating to
process P in its plants for the month of January 2007 :
43
Particulars
Work-in-Progress
01-01-2007
Rs.
Rs.
12,000
7,200
16,000
35,200
4,65,500
1,80,000
2,64,800
9,10,300
(500 units) on
Material (100%)
Degree of Completion Labour (50%)
Overheads (50%)
Units introduced during the Month
January, 2007 Units 19,500
Processing Cost incurred during the
Month
January, 2007
Materials
Labour
Overheads
Particulars
Output transferred to Process Q
Units
18,200
1,400
400
44
Material
Rs. 18,000
Labour
Rs. 17,000
Overheads
Rs. 5,300
During the month of January 2008, actual issue of materials for the production
purpose was Rs. 3,42,500. wages and overheads in the month of January, 2008
amounted to
Rs. 4,02,600 and Rs. 1,12,200 respectively. Finished production taken into the stock
in the month was 12,500 units. There was no loss in the process. At the end of the
month of January, 2008 the stock of Work-in-Progress was 2500 units (60%
complete as to
Labour and Overheads and 80% complete as to materials).
Prepare the following statements for January, 2008.
a) No. of units introduced in the
process
c) Statement of Cost
e) Process Account.
b Statement of Equivalent
) Production
d
) Statement of Evaluation