Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

Assessment Problems

AP 9.1 [a] V = 170/−40◦ V

[b] 10 sin(1000t + 20◦ ) = 10 cos(1000t − 70◦ )

.·. I = 10/−70◦ A

[c] I = 5/36.87◦ + 10/−53.13◦

= 4 + j3 + 6 − j8 = 10 − j5 = 11.18/−26.57◦ A
[d] sin(20,000πt + 30◦ ) = cos(20,000πt − 60◦ )
Thus,

V = 300/45◦ − 100/−60◦ = 212.13 + j212.13 − (50 − j86.60)

= 162.13 + j298.73 = 339.90/61.51◦ mV

AP 9.2 [a] v = 18.6 cos(ωt − 54◦ ) V

[b] I = 20/45◦ − 50/− 30◦ = 14.14 + j14.14 − 43.3 + j25

= −29.16 + j39.14 = 48.81/126.68◦

Therefore i = 48.81 cos(ωt + 126.68◦ ) mA

[c] V = 20 + j80 − 30/15◦ = 20 + j80 − 28.98 − j7.76

= −8.98 + j72.24 = 72.79/97.08◦

v = 72.79 cos(ωt + 97.08◦ ) V

AP 9.3 [a] ωL = (104 )(20 × 10−3 ) = 200 Ω

[b] ZL = jωL = j200 Ω

9–1
 9–2 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

[c] VL = IZL = (10/30◦ )(200/90◦ ) × 10−3 = 2/120◦ V

[d] vL = 2 cos(10,000t + 120◦ ) V
−1 −1
AP 9.4 [a] XC = = = −50 Ω
ωC 4000(5 × 10−6 )
[b] ZC = jXC = −j50 Ω
V 30/25◦
[c] I = = = 0.6/115◦ A
ZC 50/−90◦
[d] i = 0.6 cos(4000t + 115◦ ) A
AP 9.5 I1 = 100/25◦ = 90.63 + j42.26

I2 = 100/145◦ = −81.92 + j57.36

I3 = 100/−95◦ = −8.72 − j99.62

I4 = −(I1 + I2 + I3 ) = (0 + j0) A, therefore i4 = 0 A

125/−60◦ 125
AP 9.6 [a] I = = /(−60 − θZ )◦
|Z|/θz |Z|
But −60 − θZ = −105◦ .·. θZ = 45◦
Z = 90 + j160 + jXC
1
.·. XC = −70 Ω; XC = − = −70
ωC
1
.·. C = = 2.86 µF
(70)(5000)
Vs 125/−60◦
[b] I = = = 0.982/−105◦ A; .·. |I| = 0.982 A
Z (90 + j90)
AP 9.7 [a]

ω = 2000 rad/s
−1
ωL = 10 Ω, = −20 Ω
ωC
20(j10)
Zxy = 20
j10 + 5 + j20 = + 5 − j20
(20 + j10)
= 4 + j8 + 5 − j20 = (9 − j12) Ω
 Problems 9–3

−1
[b] ωL = 40 Ω, = −5 Ω
ωC


(20)(j40)
Zxy = 5 − j5 + 20
j40 = 5 − j5 +
20 + j40

= 5 − j5 + 16 + j8 = (21 + j3) Ω

  
20(jωL) j106
[c] Zxy = + 5−
20 + jωL 25ω
20ω 2 L2 j400ωL j106
= + + 5 −
400 + ω 2 L2 400 + ω 2 L2 25ω
The impedance will be purely resistive when the j terms cancel, i.e.,
400ωL 106
=
400 + ω 2 L2 25ω
Solving for ω yields ω = 4000 rad/s.
20ω 2 L2
[d] Zxy = + 5 = 10 + 5 = 15 Ω
400 + ω 2 L2
AP 9.8 The frequency 4000 rad/s was found to give Zxy = 15 Ω in Assessment Problem 9.7.
Thus,

V 150/0◦
V = 150/0◦ , Is = = = 10/0◦ A
Zxy 15

Using current division,

20
IL = (10) = 5 − j5 = 7.07/−45◦ A
20 + j20

iL = 7.07 cos(4000t − 45◦ ) A, Im = 7.07 A

AP 9.9 After replacing the delta made up of the 50 Ω, 40 Ω, and 10 Ω resistors with its
equivalent wye, the circuit becomes
 9–4 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

The circuit is further simplified by combining the parallel branches,

(20 + j40)
(5 − j15) = (12 − j16) Ω

136/0◦
Therefore I = = 4/28.07◦ A
14 + 12 − j16 + 4

AP 9.10 V1 = 240/53.13◦ = 144 + j192 V

V2 = 96/−90◦ = −j96 V

jωL = j(4000)(15 × 10−3 ) = j60 Ω

1 6 × 106
= −j = −j60 Ω
jωC (4000)(25)

Perform source transformations:

V1 144 + j192
= = 3.2 − j2.4 A
j60 j60

V2 96
= −j = −j4.8 A
20 20

Combine the parallel impedances:

1 1 1 1 j5 1
Y = + + + = =
j60 30 −j60 20 j60 12

1
Z= = 12 Ω
Y

Vo = 12(3.2 + j2.4) = 38.4 + j28.8 V = 48/36.87◦ V

vo = 48 cos(4000t + 36.87◦ ) V
 Problems 9–5

AP 9.11 Use the lower node as the reference node. Let V1 = node voltage across the 20 Ω
resistor and VTh = node voltage across the capacitor. Writing the node voltage
equations gives us

V1 V1 − 10Ix −j10
− 2/45◦ + = 0 and VTh = (10Ix )
20 j10 10 − j10

We also have

V1
Ix =
20

Solving these equations for VTh gives VTh = 10/45◦ V. To find the Thévenin
impedance, we remove the independent current source and apply a test voltage
source at the terminals a, b. Thus

It follows from the circuit that

10Ix = (20 + j10)Ix

Therefore

VT VT
Ix = 0 and IT = +
−j10 10

VT
ZTh = , therefore ZTh = (5 − j5) Ω
IT

AP 9.12 The phasor domain circuit is as shown in the following diagram:

 9–6 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

The node voltage equation is

V V V V − 100/−90◦
−10 + + + + =0
5 −j(20/9) j5 20

Therefore V = 10 − j30 = 31.62/−71.57◦

Therefore v = 31.62 cos(50,000t − 71.57◦ ) V

AP 9.13 Let Ia , Ib , and Ic be the three clockwise mesh currents going from left to right.
Summing the voltages around meshes a and b gives

33.8 = (1 + j2)Ia + (3 − j5)(Ia − Ib )

and

0 = (3 − j5)(Ib − Ia ) + 2(Ib − Ic ).

But

Vx = −j5(Ia − Ib ),

therefore

Ic = −0.75[−j5(Ia − Ib )].

Solving for I = Ia = 29 + j2 = 29.07/3.95◦ A.

√
AP 9.14 [a] M = 0.4 0.0625 = 0.1 H, ωM = 80 Ω

Z22 = 40 + j800(0.125) + 360 + j800(0.25) = (400 + j300) Ω

∗
Therefore |Z22 | = 500 Ω, Z22 = (400 − j300) Ω
 2
80
Zr = (400 − j300) = (10.24 − j7.68) Ω
500
245.20
[b] I1 = = 0.50/− 53.13◦ A
184 + 100 + j400 + Zr
i1 = 0.5 cos(800t − 53.13◦ ) A
 
jωM j80
[c] I2 = I1 = (0.5/− 53.13◦ ) = 0.08/0◦ A
Z22 500/36.87◦
i2 = 80 cos 800t mA
 Problems 9–7

Vs 25 × 103 /0◦
AP 9.15 I1 = =
Z1 + Z2 /a2 1500 + j6000 + (25)2 (4 − j14.4)

= 4 + j3 = 5/36.87◦ A

V1 = Vs − Z1 I1 = 25,000/0◦ − (4 + j3)(1500 + j6000)

= 37,000 − j28,500

1
V2 = − V1 = −1480 + j1140 = 1868.15/142.39◦ V
25

V2 1868.15/142.39◦
I2 = = = 125/− 143.13◦ A
Z2 4 − j14.4

Also, I2 = −25I1
 9–8 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

Problems

ω
P 9.1 [a] ω = 2πf = 3769.91 rad/s, f= = 600 Hz
2π
[b] T = 1/f = 1.67 ms
[c] Vm = 10 V
[d] v(0) = 10 cos(−53.13◦ ) = 6 V
−53.13◦ (2π)
[e] φ = −53.13◦ ; φ= = −0.9273 rad
360◦
[f] V = 0 when 3769.91t − 53.13◦ = 90◦ . Now resolve the units:
143.13◦
(3769.91 rad/s)t = = 2.498 rad, t = 662.64 µs
(180◦ /π)
[g] (dv/dt) = (−10)3769.91 sin(3769.91t − 53.13◦ )

(dv/dt) = 0 when 3769.91t − 53.13◦ = 0◦

53.13◦
or 3769.91t = = 0.9273 rad
57.3◦ /rad
Therefore t = 245.97 µs

1  T /2 2 2 2π
P 9.2 Vrms = Vm sin t dt
T 0 T

 T /2    
2π Vm2  T /2 4π V 2T
Vm2 sin 2
t dt = 1 − cos t dt = m
0 T 2 0 T 4

1 Vm2 T Vm
Therefore Vrms = =
T 4 2

P 9.3 [a] 40 V
[b] 2πf = 100π; f = 50Hz
[c] ω = 100π = 314.159 rad/s
2π π
[d] θ(rad) = ◦
(60◦ ) = = 1.05 rad
360 3
◦
[e] θ = 60
1 1
[f] T = = = 20 ms
f 50
[g] v = −40 when
π
100πt + = π; .·. t = 6.67 ms
3
 Problems 9–9

 

0.01 π
[h] v = 40 cos 100π t − +
3 3
= 40 cos[100πt − (π/3) + (π/3)]
= 40 cos 100πt V
[i] 100π(t − to ) + (π/3) = 100πt − (π/2)
5π
.·. 100πto = ; to = 8.33 ms
6
[j] 100π(t + to ) + (π/3) = 100πt + 2π
5π
.·. 100πto = ; to = 16.67 ms
3
16.67 ms to the left
P 9.4

[a] Left as φ becomes more positive

[b] Left

P 9.5 [a] By hypothesis

v = 80 cos(ωt + θ)
dv
= −80ω sin(ωt + θ)
dt
.·. 80ω = 80,000; ω = 1000 rad/s
ω 1
[b] f = = 159.155 Hz; T = = 6.28 ms
2π f
−2π/3
= −0.3333, .·. θ = −90 − (−0.3333)(360) = 30◦
6.28
.·. v = 80 cos(1000t + 30◦ ) V
 9–10 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

T
P 9.6 [a] = 8 + 2 = 10 ms; T = 20 ms
2
1 1
f= = = 50Hz
T 20 × 10−3
[b] v = Vm sin(ωt + θ)

ω = 2πf = 100π rad/s

π
100π(−2 × 10−3 ) + θ = 0; .·. θ = rad = 36◦
5
v = Vm sin[100πt + 36◦ ]

80.9 = Vm sin 36◦ ; Vm = 137.64 V

v = 137.64 sin[100πt + 36◦ ] = 137.64 cos[100πt − 54◦ ] V

 to +T
P 9.7 u= Vm2 cos2 (ωt + φ) dt
to
 to +T
1 1
= Vm2 + cos(2ωt + 2φ) dt
t
o
2 2
 to +T
Vm2  to +T
= to dt + cos(2ωt + 2φ) dt
2 to
 
V2 1  
= m T+ sin(2ωt + 2φ) |ttoo +T
2 2ω
 
Vm2 1
= T+ [sin(2ωto + 4π + 2φ) − sin(2ωto + 2φ)]
2 2ω
   
2 T 1 2 T
= Vm + (0) = Vm
2 2ω 2
√ √
P 9.8 Vm = 2Vrms = 2(120) = 169.71 V

P 9.9 [a] The numerical values of the terms in Eq. 9.8 are
Vm = 20, R/L = 1066.67, ωL = 60
√
R2 + ω 2 L2 = 100

φ = 25◦ , θ = tan−1 60/80, θ = 36.87◦

Substitute these values into Equation 9.9:

 
i = −195.72e−1066.67t + 200 cos(800t − 11.87◦ ) mA, t≥0
[b] Transient component = −195.72e−1066.67t mA
Steady-state component = 200 cos(800t − 11.87◦ ) mA
[c] By direct substitution into Eq 9.9 in part (a), i(1.875 ms) = 28.39 mA
[d] 200 mA, 800 rad/s, −11.87◦
 Problems 9–11

[e] The current lags the voltage by 36.87◦ .

P 9.10 [a] From Eq. 9.9 we have

di Vm R cos(φ − θ) −(R/L)t ωLVm sin(ωt + φ − θ)
L = √ 2 e − √
dt R + ω 2 L2 R 2 + ω 2 L2
−Vm R cos(φ − θ)e−(R/L)t Vm R cos(ωt + φ − θ)
Ri = √ + √
R 2 + ω 2 L2 R 2 + ω 2 L2


di R cos(ωt + φ − θ) − ωL sin(ωt + φ − θ)
L + Ri = Vm √
dt R 2 + ω 2 L2
But
R ωL
√ = cos θ and √ = sin θ
R 2 + ω 2 L2 R 2 + ω 2 L2
Therefore the right-hand side reduces to
Vm cos(ωt + φ)
At t = 0, Eq. 9.9 reduces to
−Vm cos(φ − θ) Vm cos(φ − θ)
i(0) = √ 2 + √ 2 =0
R − ω 2 L2 R + ω 2 L2
Vm
[b] iss = √ 2 cos(ωt + φ − θ)
R + ω 2 L2
Therefore
diss −ωLVm
L =√ 2 sin(ωt + φ − θ)
dt R + ω 2 L2
and
Vm R
Riss = √ 2 cos(ωt + φ − θ)
R + ω 2 L2


diss R cos(ωt + φ − θ) − ωL sin(ωt + φ − θ)
L + Riss = Vm √
dt R 2 + ω 2 L2
= Vm cos(ωt + φ)

P 9.11 [a] Y = 50/60◦ + 100/− 30◦ = 111.8/− 3.43◦

y = 111.8 cos(500t − 3.43◦ )

[b] Y = 200/50◦ − 100/60◦ = 102.99/40.29◦

y = 102.99 cos(377t + 40.29◦ )

[c] Y = 80/30◦ − 100/− 225◦ + 50/− 90◦ = 161.59/− 29.96◦

y = 161.59 cos(100t − 29.96◦ )

 9–12 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

[d] Y = 250/0◦ + 250/120◦ + 250/− 120◦ = 0

y=0

P 9.12 [a] 1000Hz

[b] θv = 0◦
200/0◦ 200
[c] I = = /− 90◦ = 25/− 90◦ ; θi = −90◦
jωL ωL
200 200
[d] = 25; ωL = = 8Ω
ωL 25
8
[e] L = = 1.27 mH
2π(1000)
[f] ZL = jωL = j8 Ω

P 9.13 [a] ω = 2πf = 314,159.27 rad/s

V 10 × 10−3 /0◦
[b] I = = = jωC(10 × 10−3 )/0◦ = 10 × 10−3 ωC/90◦
ZC 1/jωC

.·. θi = 90◦

[c] 628.32 × 10−6 = 10 × 10−3 ωC

1 10 × 10−3
= = 15.92 Ω, .·. XC = −15.92 Ω
ωC 628.32 × 10−6
1 1
[d] C = =
15.92(ω) (15.92)(100π × 103 )
C = 0.2 µF
 
−1
[e] Zc = j = −j15.92 Ω
ωC
P 9.14 [a] jωL = j(2 × 104 )(300 × 10−6 ) = j6 Ω
1 1
= −j = −j10 Ω; Ig = 922/30◦ A
jωC (2 × 10 )(5 × 10−6 )
4
 Problems 9–13

[b] Vo = 922/30◦ Ze
1 1 1 1
Ze = ; Ye = +j +
Ye 10 10 8 + j6
Ye = 0.18 + j0.04 S
1
Ze = = 5.42/− 12.53◦ Ω
0.18 + j0.04
Vo = (922/30◦ )(5.42/− 12.53◦ ) = 5000.25/17.47◦ V

[c] vo = 5000.25 cos(2 × 104 t + 17.47◦ ) V

P 9.15 [a] ZL = j(8000)(5 × 10−3 ) = j40 Ω

−j
ZC = = −j100 Ω
(8000)(1.25 × 10−6 )

600/20◦
[b] I = = 8.32/76.31◦ A
40 + j40 − j100
[c] i = 8.32 cos(8000t + 76.31◦ ) A
1
P 9.16 Z = 4 + j(50)(0.24) − j = 4 + j4 = 5.66/45◦ Ω
(50)(0.0025)

V 0.1/− 90◦
Io = = = 17.68/− 135◦ mA
Z 5.66/45◦

io (t) = 17.68 cos(50t − 135◦ ) mA

1 1 1
P 9.17 [a] Y = + +
3 + j4 16 − j12 −j4
= 0.12 − j0.16 + 0.04 + j0.03 + j0.25
= 0.16 + j0.12 = 200/36.87◦ mS
[b] G = 160 mS
[c] B = 120 mS
 9–14 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

I 8
[d] I = 8/0◦ A, V= = = 40/−36.87◦ V
Y 0.2/36.87◦
V 40/−36.87◦
IC = = ◦
= 10/53.13◦ A
ZC 4/−90
iC = 10 cos(ωt + 53.13◦ ) A, Im = 10 A

P 9.18 ZL = j(2000)(60 × 10−3 ) = j120 Ω

−j
ZC = = −j40 Ω
(2000)(12.5 × 10−6 )

Construct the phasor domain equivalent circuit:

Using current division:

(120 − j40)
I= (0.5) = 0.25 − j0.25 A
120 − j40 + 40 + j120

Vo = j120I = 30 + j30 = 42.43/45◦ V

vo = 42.43 cos(2000t + 45◦ ) V

P 9.19 [a] Vg = 300/78◦ ; Ig = 6/33◦

Vg 300/78◦
.·. Z = = ◦
= 50/45◦ Ω
Ig 6/33
[b] ig lags vg by 45◦ :
2πf = 5000π; f = 2500 Hz; T = 1/f = 400 µs

· 45◦
. . ig lags vg by (400 µs) = 50 µs
360◦
 Problems 9–15

1 1
P 9.20 = = −j20 Ω
jωC (1 × 10 )(50 × 103 )
−6

jωL = j50 × 103 (1.2 × 10−3 ) = j60 Ω

Vg = 40/0◦ V

Ze = −j20 + 30
j60 = 24 − j8 Ω

40/0◦
Ig = = 1.5 + j0.5 mA
24 − j8

30(j60)
Vo = (30
j60)Ig = (1.5 + j0.5) = 30 + j30 = 42.43/45◦ V
30 + j60

vo = 42.43 cos(50,000t + 45◦ ) V

1
P 9.21 [a] Z1 = R1 − j
ωC1
R2 /jωC2 R2 R2 − jωR22 C2
Z2 = = =
R2 + (1/jωC2 ) 1 + jωR2 C2 1 + ω 2 R22 C22
R2
Z1 = Z2 when R1 = and
1 + ω 2 R22 C22
1 ωR22 C2 1 + ω 2 R22 C22
= or C1 =
ωC1 1 + ω 2 R22 C22 ω 2 R22 C2
1000
[b] R1 = = 200 Ω
1 + (40 × 103 )2 (1000)2 (50 × 10−9 )2

1 + (40 × 103 )2 (1000)2 (50 × 10−9 )2

C1 = = 62.5 nF
(40 × 103 )2 (1000)2 (50 × 10−9 )
 9–16 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

1
P 9.22 [a] Y2 = + jωC2
R2
1 jωC1 ω 2 R1 C12 + jωC1
Y1 = = =
R1 + (1/jωC1 ) 1 + jωR1 C1 1 + ω 2 R12 C12
Therefore Y1 = Y2 when
1 + ω 2 R12 C12 C1
R2 = and C2 =
ω 2 R1 C12 1 + ω 2 R12 C12
1 + (50 × 103 )2 (1000)2 (40 × 10−9 )2
[b] R2 = = 1250 Ω
(50 × 103 )2 (1000)(40 × 10−9 )2

40 × 10−9
C2 = = 8 nF
1 + (50 × 103 )2 (1000)2 (40 × 10−9 )2

P 9.23 [a] Z1 = R1 + jωL1

R2 (jωL2 ) ω 2 L22 R2 + jωL2 R22
Z2 = =
R2 + jωL2 R2 + ω 2 L22
ω 2 L22 R2 R22 L2
Z1 = Z2 when R1 = and L1 =
R22 + ω 2 L22 R22 + ω 2 L22
(4000)2 (1.25)2 (5000)
[b] R1 = = 2500 Ω
50002 + 40002 (1.25)2

(5000)2 (1.25)
L1 = = 625 mH
50002 + 40002 (1.25)2

1 j
P 9.24 [a] Y2 = −
R2 ωL2
1 R1 − jωL1
Y1 = = 2
R1 + jωL1 R1 + ω 2 L21
Therefore Y2 = Y1 when
R12 + ω 2 L21 R12 + ω 2 L21
R2 = and L2 =
R1 ω 2 L1
80002 + 10002 (4)2
[b] R2 = = 10 kΩ
8000
80002 + 10002 (4)2
L2 = = 20 H
10002 (4)
 Problems 9–17

P 9.25 Vg = 500/30◦ V; Ig = 0.1/83.13◦ mA

Vg
Z= = 5000/− 53.13◦ Ω = 3000 − j4000 Ω
Ig
 
32 × 103
z = 3000 + j ω −
ω

32 × 103
ω− = −4000
ω

ω 2 + 4000ω − 32 × 103 = 0

ω = 7.984 rad/s

50,000 −j20 × 106

P 9.26 [a] Zeq = +
(1200 + j0.2ω)
3 ω
50,000 −j20 × 106 (1200 + j0.2ω)
= + 6
3 ω 1200 + j[0.2ω − 20×10
ω
]
  
−j20×106 20×106
50,000 ω
(1200 + j0.2ω) 1200 − j 0.2ω − ω
= +  2
3 20×106
12002 + 0.2ω − ω

 
20 × 106 20 × 106 20 × 106
Im(Zeq ) = − (1200)2 − 0.2ω 0.2ω − =0
ω ω ω

 
20 × 106
−20 × 10 (1200) − 20 × 10
6 2 6
0.2ω 0.2ω − =0
ω
 
20 × 106
−(1200) = 0.2ω 0.2ω −
2
ω
0.22 ω 2 − 0.2(20 × 106 ) + 12002 = 0
ω 2 = 64 × 106 .·. ω = 8000 rad/s
.·. f = 1273.24 Hz
50,000
[b] Zeq = + −j2500
(1200 + j1600)
3
50,000 (−j2500)(1200 + j1600)
= + = 20,000 Ω
3 1200 − j900
30/0◦
Ig = = 1.5/0◦ mA
20,000
ig (t) = 1.5 cos 8000t mA
 9–18 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.27 [a] Find the equivalent impedance seen by the source, as a function of L, and set the
imaginary part of the equivalent impedance to 0, solving for L:
−j
ZC = = −j1000 Ω
(500)(2 × 10−6 )
2000(j500L)
Zeq = −j1000 + j500L
2000 = −j1000 +
2000 + j500L
2000(j500L)(2000 − j500L)
= −j1000 +
20002 + (500L)2

20002 (500L)
Im(Zeq ) = −1000 + =0
20002 + (500L)2

20002 (500L)
.·. = 1000
20002 + (500L)2
1
.·. 5002 L2 − 20002 L + 20002 = 0
2
Solving the quadratic equation, L = 4H
100/0◦ 100/0◦
[b] Ig = = = 0.1/0◦ A
−j1000 + j2000
2000 1000
ig (t) = 0.1 cos 500t A

−jR/ωC
P 9.28 [a] jωL + R
(−j/ωC) = jωL +
R − j/ωC
−jR
= jωL +
ωCR − j1
−jR(ωCR + j1)
= jωL +
ω 2 C 2 R2 + 1
ωCR2
Im(Zab ) = ωL − =0
ω 2 C 2 R2 + 1
CR2
.·. L=
ω 2 C 2 R2 + 1
CR2
.·. ω 2 C 2 R2 + 1 =
L
−9 2
(CR2 /L) − 1
(25×10 )(100)
−1
.·. 2
ω = = 160×10−6
= 900 × 108
2
C R 2 (25 × 10 ) (100)2
−9 2

ω = 300 krad/s
 Problems 9–19

(100)(−j133.33)
[b] Zab (300 × 103 ) = j48 + = 64 Ω
100 − j133.33
P 9.29 jωL = j100 × 103 (0.6 × 10−3 ) = j60 Ω

1 −j
= = −j25 Ω
jωC (100 × 103 )(0.4 × 10−6 )

VT = −j25IT + 5I∆ − 30I∆

−j60
I∆ = IT
30 + j60

j60
VT = −j25IT + 25 IT
30 + j60

VT
= Zab = 20 − j15 = 25/− 36.87◦ Ω
IT

106
P 9.30 [a] Z1 = 400 − j = 400 − j800 Ω
500(2.5)

j106 L
Z2 = 2000
j500L =
2000 + j500L
j106 L
ZT = Z1 + Z2 = 400 − j800 +
2000 + j500L
500 × 106 L2 2 × 109 L
= 400 + − j800 + j
20002 + 5002 L2 20002 + 5002 L2
ZT is resistive when
2 × 109 L
= 800 or 5002 L2 − 25 × 105 L + 20002 = 0
20002 + 5002 L2
Solving, L1 = 8 H and L2 = 2 H.
 9–20 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

[b] When L = 8 H:
500 × 106 (8)2
ZT = 400 + = 2000 Ω
20002 + 5002 (8)2
200/0◦
Ig = = 100/0◦ mA
2000
ig = 100 cos 500t mA

When L = 2 H:
500 × 106 (2)2
ZT = 400 + = 800 Ω
20002 + 500(2)2
200/0◦
Ig = = 250/0◦ mA
800
ig = 250 cos 500t mA

11
P 9.31 [a] Y1 = = 4.4 × 10−6 S
2500 × 103
1
Y2 =
14,000 + j5ω
14,000 5ω
= −j
196 × 10 + 25ω
6 2 196 × 106 + 25ω 2
Y3 = jω2 × 10−9

Y T = Y 1 + Y2 + Y3

For ig and vo to be in phase the j component of YT must be zero; thus,

5ω
ω2 × 10−9 =
196 × 106 + 25ω 2
or
5
25ω 2 + 196 × 106 =
2 × 10−9
.·. 25ω 2 = 2304 × 106 .·. ω = 9600 rad/s
14,000
[b] YT = 4.4 × 10−6 + = 10 × 10−6 S
196 × 106 + 25(9600)2

.·. ZT = 100 kΩ

Vo = (0.25 × 10−3 /0◦ )(100 × 103 ) = 25/0◦ V

vo = 25 cos 9600t V
 Problems 9–21

106 103 (j0.5ω)

P 9.32 [a] Zg = 500 − j + 3
ω 10 + j0.5ω
106 500jω(1000 − j0.5ω)
= 500 − j +
ω 106 + 0.25ω 2
106 250ω 2 5 × 105 ω
= 500 − j + 6 + j
ω 10 + 0.25ω 2 106 + 0.25ω 2
106 5 × 105 ω
.·. If Zg is purely real, = 6
ω 10 + 0.25ω 2
2(106 + 0.25ω 2 ) = ω 2 .·. 4 × 106 = ω 2

.·. ω = 2000 rad/s

[b] When ω = 2000 rad/s

Zg = 500 − j500 + (j1000
1000) = 1000 Ω
20/0◦
.·. Ig = = 20/0◦ mA
1000
Vo = Vg − Ig Z1

Z1 = 500 − j500 Ω

Vo = 20/0◦ − (0.02/0◦ )(500 − j500) = 10 + j10 = 14.14/45◦ V

vo = 14.14 cos(2000t + 45◦ ) V

P 9.33 Zab = 1 − j8 + (2 + j4)
(10 − j20) + (40
j20)

= 1 − j8 + 3 + j4 + 8 + j16 = 12 + j12 Ω = 16.971/45◦ Ω

P 9.34 First find the admittance of the parallel branches

1 1 1 1
Yp = + + + = 0.625 − j1.875 S
2 − j6 12 + j4 2 j0.5

1 1
Zp = = = 0.16 + j0.48 Ω
Yp 0.625 − j1.875

Zab = −j4.48 + 0.16 + j0.48 + 2.84 = 3 − j4 Ω

1 1
Yab = = = 120 + j160 mS
Zab 3 − j4

= 200/53.13◦ mS
 9–22 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.35 Simplify the top triangle using series and parallel combinations:

(1 + j1)
(1 − j1) = 1 Ω

Convert the lower left delta to a wye:

(j1)(1)
Z1 = = j1 Ω
1 + j1 − j1
(−j1)(1)
Z2 = = −j1 Ω
1 + j1 − j1
(j1)(−j1)
Z3 = = 1Ω
1 + j1 − j1
Convert the lower right delta to a wye:

(−j1)(1)
Z4 = = −j1 Ω
1 + j1 − j1
(−j1)(j1)
Z5 = = 1Ω
1 + j1 − j1
(j1)(1)
Z6 = = j1 Ω
1 + j1 − j1
The resulting circuit is shown below:

Simplify the middle portion of the circuit by making series and parallel
combinations:

(1 + j1 − j1)
(1 + 1) = 1
2 = 2/3 Ω

Zab = −j1 + 2/3 + j1 = 2/3 Ω

 Problems 9–23

Zo 500 − j1000
P 9.36 V o = Vg = (100/0◦ ) = 111.8/− 100.3◦ V
ZT 300 + j1600 + 500 − j1000

vo = 111.8 cos(8000t − 100.3◦ ) V

1
P 9.37 = −j400 Ω
jωC

jωL = j1200 Ω

Let Z1 = 200 − j400 Ω; Z2 = 600 + j1200 Ω

Ig = 400/0◦ mA

Z2 600 + j1200
Io = Ig = (0.4/0◦ )
Z1 + Z2 800 + j800

= 450 + j150 mA = 474.34/18.43◦ mA

io = 474.34 cos(20,000t + 18.43◦ ) mA

P 9.38

V1 = j5(−j2) = 10 V

15
−25 + 10 + (4 − j3)I1 = 0 .·. I1 = = 2.4 + j1.8 A
4 − j3

I2 = I1 − j5 = (2.4 + j1.8) − j5 = 2.4 − j3.2 A

 9–24 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

VZ = −j5I2 + (4 − j3)I1 = −j5(2.4 − j3.2) + (4 − j3)(2.4 + j1.8) = −1 − j12 V

−25 + (1 + j3)I3 + (−1 − j12) = 0 .·. I3 = 6.2 − j6.6 A

IZ = I3 − I2 = (6.2 − j6.6) − (2.4 − j3.2) = 3.8 − j3.4 A

VZ −1 − j12
Z= = = 1.42 − j1.88 Ω
IZ 3.8 − j3.4
P 9.39 Is = 3/0◦ mA
1
= −j0.4 Ω
jωC
jωL = j0.4 Ω

After source transformation we have

−j0.4
j0.4
5
Vo = (66 × 10−3 ) = 10 mV
28 + −j0.4
j0.4
5
vo = 10 cos 200t mV

P 9.40 [a]

Va = (50 + j150)(2/0◦ ) = 100 + j300 V

100 + j300
Ib = = j2.5 A = 2.5/90◦ A
120 − j40
Ic = 2/0◦ + j2.5 + 6 + j3.5 = 8 + j6 A = 10/36.87◦ A
Vg = 5Ic + Va = 5(8 + j6) + 100 + j300 = 140 + j330 V = 358.47/67.01◦ V
 Problems 9–25

[b] ib = 2.5 cos(800t + 90◦ ) A

ic = 10 cos(800t + 36.87◦ ) A

vg = 358.47 cos(800t + 67.01◦ ) V

P 9.41 [a] jωL = j(1000)(100) × 10−3 = j100 Ω

1 106
= −j = −j100 Ω
jωC (1000)(10)

Using voltage division,

(100 + j100)
(−j100)
Vab = (247.49/45◦ ) = 350/0◦
j100 + (100 + j100)
(−j100)
VTh = Vab = 350/0◦ V

[b] Remove the voltage source and combine impedances in parallel to find
ZTh = Zab :
1 1 1
Yab = + + = 5 − j5 mS
j100 100 + j100 −j100
1
ZTh = Zab = = 100 + j100 Ω
Yab
[c]
 9–26 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.42 Using voltage division:

36
VTh = (240) = 216 − j72 = 227.68/− 18.43◦ V
36 + j60 − j48

Remove the source and combine impedances in series and in parallel:

ZTh = 36
(j60 − j48) = 3.6 + j10.8 Ω

P 9.43 Open circuit voltage:

V2 V2 − 15 V2
+ 88Iφ + =0
10 −j50

5 − (V2 /5)
Iφ =
200

Solving,

V2 = −66 + j88 = 110/126.87◦ V = VTh

Find the Thévenin equivalent impedance using a test source:

VT 0.8Vt
IT = + 88Iφ +
10 −j50

−VT /5
Iφ =
200
 
1 1/5 0.8
I T = VT − 88 +
10 200 −j50
 Problems 9–27

VT
.·. = 30 − j40 = ZTh
IT

VTh −66 + j88

IN = = = −2.2 + j0 A = 2.2/180◦ A
ZTh 30 − j40

The Norton equivalent circuit:

P 9.44 Short circuit current

−6Iβ
Iβ =
2
2Iβ = −6Iβ ; .·. Iβ = 0

I1 = 0; .·. Isc = 10/−45◦ A = IN

The Norton impedance is the same as the Thévenin impedance. Find it using a test
source

j1
VT = 6Iβ + 2Iβ = 8Iβ , Iβ = IT
2 + j1
 9–28 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

VT 8Iβ j8
ZTh = = = = 1.6 + j3.2 Ω
IT [(2 + j1)/j1]Iβ 2 + j1

P 9.45 Using current division:

50
IN = Isc = (4) = 1.6 − j1.2 = 2/− 36.87◦ A
80 + j60

ZN = −j100
(80 + j60) = 100 − j50 Ω

The Norton equivalent circuit:

P 9.46 ω = 2π(200/π) = 400 rad/s

−j
Zc = = −j2500 Ω
400(10−6 )

VT = (10,000 − j2500)IT + 100(200)IT

VT
ZTh = = 30 − j2.5 kΩ
IT
P 9.47

5 − j15
IN = + (1 − j3) mA, ZN in kΩ
ZN
 Problems 9–29

−18 − j13.5
IN = + 4.5 − j6 mA, ZN in kΩ
ZN

5 − j15 −18 − j13.5

+ 1 − j3 = + (4.5 − j6)
ZN ZN

23 − j1.5
= 3.5 − j3 .·. ZN = 4 + j3 kΩ
ZN

5 − j15
IN = + 1 − j3 = −j6 mA = 6/− 90◦ mA
4 + j3

P 9.48 Open circuit voltage:

V1 − 250 V1
− 0.03Vo + =0
20 + j10 50 − j100

−j100
.·. Vo = V1
50 − j100
 9–30 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

V1 j3V1 V1 250
+ + =
20 + j10 50 − j100 50 − j100 20 + j10

V1 = 500 − j250 V; Vo = 300 − j400 V = VTh = 500/− 53.13◦ V

Short circuit current:

250/0◦
Isc = = 3.5 − j0.5 A
70 + j10

VTh 300 − j400

ZTh = = = 100 − j100 Ω
Isc 3.5 − j0.5

The Thévenin equivalent circuit:

P 9.49 Open circuit voltage:

(9 + j4)Ia − Ib = −60/0◦
 Problems 9–31

−Ia + (9 − j4)Ib = 60/0◦

Solving,

Ia = −5 + j2.5 A; Ib = 5 + j2.5 A

VTh = 4Ia + (4 − j4)Ib = 10/0◦ V

Short circuit current:

(9 + j4)Ia − 1Ib − 4Isc = −60

−1Ia + (9 − j4)Ib − (4 − j4)Isc = 60

−4Ia − (4 − j4)Ib + (8 − j4)Isc = 0

Solving,

Isc = 2.07/0◦

VTh 10/0◦
ZTh = = = 4.83 Ω
Isc 2.07/0◦
9–32 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

Alternate calculation for ZTh :


Z = 4 + 1 + 4 − j4 = 9 − j4

4
Z1 =
9 − j4
4 − j4
Z2 =
9 − j4
16 − j16
Z3 =
9 − j4

4 56 + j20
Za = 4 + j4 + =
9 − j4 9 − j4
4 − j4 40 − j20
Zb = 4 + =
9 − j4 9 − j4
2640 − j320
Za
Zb =
864 − j384
16 − j16 2640 − j320 4176 − j1856
Z3 + Za
Zb = + = = 4.83 Ω
9 − j4 864 − j384 864 − j384
 Problems 9–33

P 9.50 [a]

VT VT − αVT
IT = +
1000 −j1000
IT 1 (1 − α) j−1+α
= − =
VT 1000 j1000 j1000
VT j1000
.·. ZTh = =
IT α−1+j
ZTh is real when α = 1.
[b] ZTh = 1000 Ω
j1000
[c] ZTh = 500 − j500 =
α−1+j
1000 1000(α − 1)
= +j
(α − 1) + 1
2 (α − 1)2 + 1
Equate the real parts:
1000
= 500 .·. (α − 1)2 + 1 = 2
(α − 1)2 + 1

.·. (α − 1)2 = 1 so α=0

Check the imaginary parts:


(α − 1)1000 
= −500
(α − 1)2 + 1 α=1
Thus, α = 0.
1000 1000(α − 1)
[d] ZTh = +j
(α − 1) + 1
2 (α − 1)2 + 1
For Im(ZTh ) > 0, α must be greater than 1. So ZTh is inductive for
1 < α ≤ 10.
 9–34 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.51

V1 − 240 V1 V1
+ + =0
j10 50 30 + j10

Solving for V1 yields

V1 = 198.63/− 24.44◦ V

30
Vo = (V1 ) = 188.43/− 42.88◦ V
30 + j10

P 9.52 jωL = j(2000)(1 × 10−3 ) = j2 Ω

1 106
= −j = −j5 Ω
jωC (2000)(100)

Vg1 = 20/− 36.87◦ = 16 − j12 V

Vg2 = 50/−106.26◦ = −14 − j48 V

Vo − (16 − j12) Vo Vo − (−14 − j48)

+ + =0
j2 10 −j5

Solving,

Vo = 36/0◦ V

vo (t) = 36 cos 2000t V

 Problems 9–35

P 9.53 From the solution to Problem 9.52 the phasor-domain circuit is

Making two source transformations yields

16 − j12
Ig1 = = −6 − j8 A
j2
−14 − j48
Ig2 = = 9.6 − j2.8 A
−j5
1 1 1
Y = + + = (0.1 − j0.3) S
j2 10 −j5
1
Z= = 1 + j3 Ω
Y
Ie = Ig1 + Ig2 = 3.6 − j10.8 A

Hence the circuit reduces to

Vo = ZIe = (1 + j3)(3.6 − j10.8) = 36/0◦ V

.·. vo (t) = 36 cos 2000t V

 9–36 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.54 The circuit with the mesh currents identified is shown below:

The mesh current equations are:

−20/− 36.87◦ + j2I1 + 10(I1 − I2 ) = 0

50/− 106.26◦ + 10(I2 − I1 ) − j5I2 = 0

In standard form:

I1 (10 + j2) + I2 (−10) = 20/− 36.87◦

I1 (−10) + I2 (10 − j5) = −50/− 106.26◦ = 50/73.74◦

Solving on a calculator yields:

I1 = −6 + j10A; I2 = −9.6 + j10A

Thus,

Vo = 10(I1 − I2 ) = 36V

and

vo (t) = 36 cos 2000tV

P 9.55 From the solution to Problem 9.52 the phasor-domain circuit with the right-hand
source removed is

10
− j5
Vo = (16 − j12) = 18 − j26 V
j2 + 10
− j5
 Problems 9–37

With the left hand source removed

10
j2
Vo = (−14 − j48) = 18 + j26 V
−j5 + 10
j2

Vo = Vo + Vo = 18 − j26 + 18 + j26 = 36 V

vo (t) = 36 cos 2000t V

P 9.56 Write a KCL equation at the top node:

Vo Vo − 2.4I∆ Vo
+ + − (10 + j10) = 0
−j8 j4 5
The constraint equation is:
Vo
I∆ =
−j8
Solving,

Vo = j80 = 80/90◦ V

P 9.57

Write node voltage equations:

Left Node:
V1 V1 − Vo /8
+ = 0.025/0◦
40 j20
Right Node:
Vo Vo
+ + 16Io = 0
50 j25
 9–38 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

The constraint equation is

V1 − Vo /8
Io =
j20
Solution:
Vo = (4 + j4) = 5.66/45◦ V
V1 = (0.8 + j0.6) = 1.0/36.87◦ V
Io = (5 − j15) = 15.81/− 71.57◦ mA

P 9.58

(10 + j5)Ia − j5Ib = 100/0◦

−j5Ia − j5Ib = j100

Solving,
Ia = −j10 A; Ib = −20 + j10 A

Io = Ia − Ib = 20 − j20 = 28.28/− 45◦ A

io (t) = 28.28 cos(50,000t − 45◦ ) A

P 9.59

(12 − j12)Ia − 12Ig − 5(−j8) = 0

 Problems 9–39

−12Ia + (12 + j4)Ig + j20 − 5(j4) = 0

Solving,

Ig = 4 − j2 = 4.47/− 26.57◦ A

P 9.60 Set up the frequency domain circuit to use the node voltage method:

V1 − V2 V1 − 20/90◦
At V1 : − 5/0◦ + + =0
−j8 −j4

V2 − V1 V2 V2 − 20/90◦
At V2 : + + =0
−j8 j4 12

In standard form:
   
1 1 1 20/90◦
V1 + + V2 − = 5/0◦ +
−j8 −j4 −j8 −j4
   
1 1 1 1 20/90◦
V1 − + V2 + + =
−j8 −j8 j4 12 12

Solving on a calculator:

8 4
V1 = − + j V V2 = −8 + j4 V
3 3

Thus
8 56
V0 = V1 − 20/90◦ = − − j = 18.86/− 98.13◦ V
3 3
 9–40 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.61 jωL = j5000(60 × 10−3 ) = j300 Ω

1 −j
= = −j100 Ω
jωC (5000)(2 × 10−6 )

−400/0◦ + (50 + j300)Ia − 50Ib − 150(Ia − Ib ) = 0

(150 − j100)Ib − 50Ia + 150(Ia − Ib ) = 0

Solving,

Ia = −0.8 − j1.6 A; Ib = −1.6 + j0.8 A

Vo = 100Ib = −160 + j80 = 178.89/153.43◦ V

vo = 178.89 cos(5000t + 153.43◦ ) V

P 9.62

10/0◦ = (1 − j1)I1 − 1I2 + j1I3

−5/0◦ = −1I1 + (1 + j1)I2 − j1I3

 Problems 9–41

1 = j1I1 − j1I2 + I3

Solving,

I1 = 11 + j10 A; I2 = 11 + j5 A; I3 = 6 A

Ia = I3 − 1 = 5 A = 5/0◦ A

Ib = I1 − I3 = 5 + j10 A = 11.18/63.43◦ A

Ic = I2 − I3 = 5 + j5 A = 7.07/45◦ A

Id = I1 − I2 = j5 A = 5/90◦ A

P 9.63

Va − (100 − j50) Va Va − (140 + j30)

+ + =0
20 j5 12 + j16

Solving,

Va = 40 + j30 V

140 + j30 (40 + j30) − (140 + j30)

IZ + (30 + j20) − + =0
−j10 12 + j16

Solving,

IZ = −30 − j10 A

(100 − j50) − (140 + j30)

Z= = 2 + j2 Ω
−30 − j10
 9–42 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

1
P 9.64 [a] = −j50 Ω
jωC
jωL = j120 Ω
Ze = 100
− j50 = 20 − j40 Ω
Ig = 2/0◦
Vg = Ig Ze = 2(20 − j40) = 40 − j80 V

j120
Vo = (40 − j80) = 90 − j30 = 94.87/− 18.43◦ V
80 + j80
vo = 94.87 cos(16 × 105 t − 18.43◦ ) V
8 × 105
[b] ω = 2πf = 16 × 105 ; f=
π
1 π
T = = = 1.25π µs
f 8 × 105
18.43
.·. (1.25π µs) = 201.09 ns
360
.·. vo lags ig by 201.09 ns
P 9.65 jωL = j106 (10 × 10−6 ) = j10 Ω
1 −j
= = −j10 Ω
jωC (10 )(0.1 × 10−6 )
6

Va = 50/− 90◦ = −j50 V

Vb = 25/90◦ = j25 V

(10 − j10)I1 + j10I2 − 10I3 = −j50

 Problems 9–43

j10I1 + 10I2 − 10I3 = 0

−10I1 − 10I2 + 20I3 = j25

Solving,

I1 = 0.5 − j1.5 A; I3 = −1 + j0.5 A I2 = −2.5 A

Ia = −I1 = −0.5 + j1.5 = 1.58/108.43◦ A

Ib = −I3 = 1 − j0.5 = 1.12/− 26.57◦ A

ia = 1.58 cos(106 t + 108.43◦ ) A

ib = 1.12 cos(106 t − 26.57◦ ) A

P 9.66 [a] jωL1 = j(5000)(2 × 10−3 ) = j10 Ω

jωL2 = j(5000)(8 × 10−3 ) = j40 Ω

jωM = j10 Ω

70 = (10 + j10)Ig + j10IL

0 = j10Ig + (30 + j40)IL

Solving,
Ig = 4 − j3 A; IL = −1 A

ig = 5 cos(5000t − 36.87◦ ) A

iL = 1 cos(5000t − 180◦ ) A
M 2
[b] k = √ = √ = 0.5
L1 L2 16
 9–44 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

[c] When t = 100π µs,

5000t = (5000)(100π) × 10−6 = 0.5π = π/2 rad = 90◦

ig (100πµs) = 5 cos(53.13◦ ) = 3 A

iL (100πµs) = 1 cos(−90◦ ) = 0 A
1 1 1
w = L1 i21 + L2 i22 + M i1 i2 = (2 × 10−3 )(9) + 0 + 0 = 9 mJ
2 2 2
When t = 200π µs,
5000t = π rad = 180◦

ig (200πµs) = 5 cos(180◦ − 36.87◦ ) = −4 A

iL (200πµs) = 1 cos(180◦ − 180◦ ) = 1 A

1 1
w = (2 × 10−3 )(16) + (8 × 10−3 )(1) + 2 × 10−3 (−4)(1) = 12 mJ
2 2
P 9.67 Remove the voltage source to find the equivalent impedance:
 2
20
ZTh = 45 + j125 + (5 − j5) = 85 + j85 Ω
|5 + j5|

Using voltage division:

 
425
VTh = Vcd = j20I1 = j20 = 850 + j850 V = 1202.1/45◦ V
5 + j5

P 9.68 [a] jωL1 = j(200 × 103 )(10−3 ) = j200 Ω

jωL2 = j(200 × 103 )(4 × 10−3 ) = j800 Ω

1 −j
= = −j400 Ω
jωC (200 × 10 )(12.5 × 10−9 )
3

.·. Z22 = 100 + 200 + j800 − j400 = 300 + j400 Ω

.·. Z22
∗
= 300 − j400 Ω

M = k L1 L2 = 2k × 10−3
 Problems 9–45

ωM = (200 × 103 )(2k × 10−3 ) = 400k

2
400k
Zr = (300 − j400) = k 2 (192 − j256) Ω
500

Zin = 200 + j200 + 192k 2 − j256k 2

1
|Zin | = [(200 + 192k 2 )2 + (200 − 256k 2 )2 ] 2
d|Zin | 1 1
= [(200 + 192k 2 )2 + (200 − 256k 2 )2 ]− 2 ×
dk 2

[2(200 + 192k 2 )384k + 2(200 − 256k 2 )(−512k)]

d|Zin |
= 0 when
dk
768k(200 + 192k 2 ) − 1024k(200 − 256k 2 ) = 0
√
.·. k 2 = 0.125; .·. k = 0.125 = 0.3536

[b] Zin (min) = 200 + 192(0.125) + j[200 − 0.125(256)]

= 224 + j168 = 280/36.87◦ Ω

560/0◦
I1 (max) = = 2/− 36.87◦ A
224 + j168
.·. i1 (peak) = 2 A

Note — You can test that the k value obtained from setting d|Zin |/dk = 0
leads to a minimum by noting 0 ≤ k ≤ 1. If k = 1,
Zin = 392 − j56 = 395.98/− 8.13◦ Ω
Thus,
|Zin |k=1 > |Zin |k=√0.125
If k = 0,
Zin = 200 + j200 = 282.84/45◦ Ω
Thus,
|Zin |k=0 > |Zin |k=√0.125

P 9.69 jωL1 = j50 Ω

jωL2 = j32 Ω
 9–46 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

1
= −j20 Ω
jωC

jωM = j(4 × 103 )k (12.5)(8) × 10−3 = j40k Ω

Z22 = 5 + j32 − j20 = 5 + j12 Ω

∗
Z22 = 5 − j12 Ω

2
40k
Zr = (5 − j12) = 47.337k 2 − j113.609k 2
|5 + j12|

Zab = 20 + j50 + 47.337k 2 − j113.609k 2 = (20 + 47.337k 2 ) + j(50 − 113.609k 2 )

Zab is resistive when

50 − 113.609k 2 = 0 or k 2 = 0.44 so k = 0.66

.·. Zab = 20 + (47.337)(0.44) = 40.83 Ω

P 9.70 [a] jωLL = j100 Ω

jωL2 = j500 Ω

Z22 = 300 + 500 + j100 + j500 = 800 + j600 Ω

∗
Z22 = 800 − j600 Ω

ωM = 270 Ω
 2
270
Zr = [800 − j600] = 58.32 − j43.74 Ω
1000
[b] Zab = R1 + jωL1 + Zr = 41.68 + j180 + 58.32 − j43.74 = 100 + j136.26 Ω

P 9.71

V3
ZL = = 80/60◦ Ω
I3
 Problems 9–47

V2 V3
= ; 10I2 = 1I3
10 1

V1 V2
=− ; 8I1 = −1I2
8 1

V1
Zab =
I1

Substituting,

V1 −8V2 82 V2
Zab = = =
I1 −I2 /8 I2

82 (10V3 ) (8)2 (10)2 V3

= = = (8)2 (10)2 ZL = 512, 000/60◦ Ω
I3 /10 I3

P 9.72 In Eq. 9.69 replace ω 2 M 2 with k 2 ω 2 L1 L2 and then write Xab as

k 2 ω 2 L1 L2 (ωL2 + ωLL )
Xab = ωL1 − 2
R22 + (ωL2 + ωLL )2

k 2 ωL2 (ωL2 + ωLL )
= ωL1 1− 2
R22 + (ωL2 + ωLL )2

For Xab to be negative requires

2
R22 + (ωL2 + ωLL )2 < k 2 ωL2 (ωL2 + ωLL )

or

2
R22 + (ωL2 + ωLL )2 − k 2 ωL2 (ωL2 + ωLL ) < 0

which reduces to

2
R22 + ω 2 L22 (1 − k 2 ) + ωL2 ωLL (2 − k 2 ) + ω 2 L2L < 0

But k ≤ 1 hence it is impossible to satisfy the inequality. Therefore Xab can never
be negative if XL is an inductive reactance.
 9–48 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.73 [a]

Vab V2 V2
Zab = = =
I1 + I2 I1 + I2 (1 + N1 /N2 )I1
N1
N1 I1 = N2 I2 , I2 = I1
N2
V1 N1 N1
= , V1 = V2
V2 N2 N2
 
N1
V1 + V2 = ZL I1 = + 1 V2
N2
I1 ZL
Zab =
(N1 /N2 + 1)(1 + N1 /N2 )I1
ZL
.·. Zab = Q.E.D.
[1 + (N1 /N2 )]2
[b] Assume dot on the N2 coil is moved to the lower terminal. Then
N1 N1
V1 = − V2 and I2 = − I1
N2 N2
As before
V2
Zab = and V1 + V2 = ZL I1
I1 + I2
V2 Z L I1
.·. Zab = =
(1 − N1 /N2 )I1 [1 − (N1 /N2 )]2 I1
ZL
Zab = Q.E.D.
[1 − (N1 /N2 )]2
 Problems 9–49

P 9.74 [a]

Vab V1 + V2
Zab = =
I1 I1
V1 V2 N2
= , V2 = V1
N1 N2 N1
N1
N1 I1 = N2 I2 , I2 = I1
N2
 
N1
V2 = (I1 + I2 )ZL = I1 1+ ZL
N2
   2
N1 N1
V1 + V2 = + 1 V2 = 1 + ZL I1
N2 N2
(1 + N1 /N2 )2 ZL I1
.·. Zab =
I1
 2
N1
Zab = 1+ ZL Q.E.D.
N2
[b] Assume dot on N2 is moved to the lower terminal, then
V1 −V2 −N1
= , V1 = V2
N1 N2 N2
−N1
N1 I1 = −N2 I2 , I2 = I1
N2
As in part [a]
V1 + V2
V2 = (I2 + I1 )ZL and Zab =
I1
(1 − N1 /N2 )V2 (1 − N1 /N2 )(1 − N1 /N2 )ZL I1
Zab = =
I1 I1

Zab = [1 − (N1 /N2 )]2 ZL Q.E.D.

 9–50 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

240 240
P 9.75 [a] I = + = (10 − j7.5) A
24 j32
Vs = 240/0◦ + (0.1 + j0.8)(10 − j7.5) = 247 + j7.25 = 247.11/1.68◦ V

[b] Use the capacitor to eliminate the j component of I, therefore

240
Ic = j7.5 A, Zc = = −j32 Ω
j7.5
Vs = 240 + (0.1 + j0.8)10 = 241 + j8 = 241.13/1.90◦ V

[c] Let Ic denote the magnitude of the current in the capacitor branch. Then
I = (10 − j7.5 + jIc ) = 10 + j(Ic − 7.5) A

Vs = 240/α = 240 + (0.1 + j0.8)[10 + j(Ic − 7.5)]

= (247 − 0.8Ic ) + j(7.25 + 0.1Ic )

It follows that
240 cos α = (247 − 0.8Ic ) and 240 sin α = (7.25 + 0.1Ic )
Now square each term and then add to generate the quadratic equation
I2c − 605.77Ic + 5325.48 = 0; Ic = 302.88 ± 293.96
Therefore
Ic = 8.92 A (smallest value) and Zc = 240/j8.92 = −j26.90 Ω.

P 9.76 The phasor domain equivalent circuit is

Vm /0◦ Vm /0◦
Vo = − IRx ; I=
2 Rx − jXC

As Rx varies from 0 to ∞, the amplitude of vo remains constant and its phase angle
decreases from 0◦ to −180◦ , as shown in the following phasor diagram:
 Problems 9–51

P 9.77 [a]

120 120
I = + = 16 − j10 A
7.5 j12
V = (0.15 + j6)(16 − j10) = 62.4 + j94.5 = 113.24/56.56◦ V
Vs = 120/0◦ + V = 205.43/27.39◦ V
[b]

120 120
[c] I = + = 48 − j30 A
2.5 j4
V = (0.15 + j6)(48 − j30) = 339.73/56.56◦ V
Vs = 120 + V = 418.02/42.7◦ V

The amplitude of Vs must be increased from 205.43 V to 418.02 V (more than

doubled) to maintain the load voltage at 120 V.
 9–52 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

120 120 120

[d] I = + + = 48 + j30 A
2.5 j4 −j2
V = (0.15 + j6)(48 + j30) = 339.73/120.57◦ V

Vs = 120 + V = 297.23/100.23◦ V

The amplitude of Vs must be increased from 205.43 V to 297.23 V to maintain

the load voltage at 120 V.
1
P 9.78 Vg = 4/0◦ V; = −j20 kΩ
jωC
Let Va = voltage across the capacitor, positive at upper terminal
Then:
Va − 4/0◦ Va Va
+ + = 0; .·. Va = (1.6 − j0.8) V
20,000 −j20,000 20,000

0 − Va 0 − Vo Va
+ = 0; Vo = −
20,000 10,000 2

.·. Vo = −0.8 + j0.4 = 0.89/153.43◦ V

vo = 0.89 cos(200t + 153.43◦ ) V

P 9.79 [a]

Va − 4/0◦ Va
+ jωCo Va + =0
20,000 20,000
4
Va =
2 + j20,000ωCo
Va
Vo = − (see solution to Prob. 9.78)
2
 Problems 9–53

−2 2/180◦
Vo = =
2 + j4 × 106 Co 2 + j4 × 106 Co
.·. denominator angle = 45◦

so 4 × 106 Co = 2 .·. Co = 0.5 µF

2/180◦
[b] Vo = = 0.707/135◦ V
2 + j2
vo = 0.707 cos(200t + 135◦ ) V

1
P 9.80 = −j10 kΩ
jωC1

1
= −j100 kΩ
jωC2

Va − 2 Va Va Va − Vo
+ + + =0
5000 −j10,000 20,000 100,000

20Va − 40 + j10Va + 5Va + Va − Vo = 0

.·. (26 + j10)Va − Vo = 40

0 − Va 0 − Vo
+ =0
20,000 −j100,000

j5Va − Vo = 0

Solving,

Vo = 1.43 + j7.42 = 7.55/79.11◦ V

vo (t) = 7.55 cos(106 t + 79.11◦ ) V

 9–54 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.81 [a] Vg = 25/0◦ V

20
Vp = Vg = 5/0◦ ; Vn = Vp = 5/0◦ V
100
5 5 − Vo
+ =0
80,000 Zp
Zp = −j80,000
40,000 = 32,000 − j16,000 Ω
5Zp
Vo = + 5 = 7 − j1 = 7.07/− 8.13◦ V
80,000
vo = 7.07 cos(50,000t − 8.13◦ ) V
[b] Vp = 0.2Vm /0◦ ; Vn = Vp = 0.2Vm /0◦
0.2Vm 0.2Vm − Vo
+ =0
80,000 32,000 − j16,000
32,000 − j16,000
.·. Vo = 0.2Vm + Vm (0.2) = 0.2Vm (1.4 − j0.2)
80,000
.·. |0.2Vm (1.4 − j0.2)| ≤ 10
.·. Vm ≤ 35.36 V
1
P 9.82 [a] = −j20 Ω
jωC
Vn Vn − Vo
+ =0
20 −j20
Vo Vn Vn
= +
−j20 20 −j20
Vo = −j1Vn + Vn = (1 − j1)Vn
Vg (1/jωCo ) Vg
Vp = =
5 + (1/jωCo ) 1 + j(5)(105 )Co
Vg = 6/0◦ V
6/0◦
Vp = = Vn
1 + j5 × 105 Co
(1 − j1)6/0◦
.·. Vo =
1 + j5 × 105 Co
√
2(6)
|Vo | =  =6
1 + 25 × 1010 Co2
Solving,
Co = 2 µF
 Problems 9–55

6(1 − j1)
[b] Vo = = −j6 V
1 + j1
vo = 6 cos(105 t − 90◦ ) V

P 9.83 [a]

Because the op-amps are ideal Iin = Io , thus

Vab Vab Vab − Vo
Zab = = ; Io =
Iin Io Z
 
R2
Vo1 = Vab ; Vo2 =− Vo1 = −KVo1 = −KVab
R1
Vo = Vo2 = −KVab
Vab − (−KVab ) (1 + K)Vab
.·. Io = =
Z Z
Vab Z
.·. Zab = Z=
(1 + K)Vab (1 + K)
1 1
[b] Z = ; Zab = ; .·. Cab = C(1 + K)
jωC jωC(1 + K)
120 240
P 9.84 [a] I1 = + = 23.29 − j13.71 = 27.02/−30.5◦ A
24 8.4 + j6.3
120 120
I2 = − = 5/0◦ A
12 24
120 240
I3 = + = 28.29 − j13.71 = 31.44/−25.87◦ A
12 8.4 + j6
120 120
I4 = = 5/0◦ A; I5 = = 10/0◦ A
24 12
240
I6 = = 18.29 − j13.71 = 22.86/−36.87◦ A
8.4 + j6.3
 9–56 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

I1 = 0 I3 = 15 A I5 = 10 A
[b]
I2 = 10 + 5 = 15 A I4 = −5 A I6 = 5 A
[c] The clock and television set were fed from the uninterrupted side of the circuit,
that is, the 12 Ω load includes the clock and the TV set.
[d] No, the motor current drops to 5 A, well below its normal running value of
22.86 A.
[e] After fuse A opens, the current in fuse B is only 15 A.

P 9.85 [a] The circuit is redrawn, with mesh currents identified:

The mesh current equations are:

120/0◦ = 23Ia − 2Ib − 20Ic

120/0◦ = −2Ia + 43Ib − 40Ic

0 = −20Ia − 40Ib + 70Ic

Solving,
Ia = 24/0◦ A Ib = 21.96/0◦ A Ic = 19.40/0◦ A
The branch currents are:
I1 = Ia = 24/0◦ A

I2 = Ia − Ib = 2.04/0◦ A

I3 = Ib = 21.96/0◦ A

I4 = Ic = 19.40/0◦ A

I5 = Ia − Ic = 4.6/0◦ A

I6 = Ib − Ic = 2.55/0◦ A
 Problems 9–57

[b] Let N1 be the number of turns on the primary winding; because the secondary
winding is center-tapped, let 2N2 be the total turns on the secondary. From
Fig. 9.58,
13,200 240 N2 1
= or =
N1 2N2 N1 110
The ampere turn balance requires
N1 Ip = N2 I1 + N2 I3
Therefore,
N2 1
Ip = (I1 + I3 ) = (24 + 21.96) = 0.42/0◦ A
N1 110
Check voltages —
V4 = 10I4 = 194/0◦ V
V5 = 20I5 = 92/0◦ V
V6 = 40I6 = 102/0◦ V

All of these voltages are low for a reasonable distribution circuit.

P 9.86 [a]

The three mesh current equations are

120/0◦ = 23Ia − 2Ib − 20Ic
120/0◦ = −2Ia + 23Ib − 20Ic
0 = −20Ia − 20Ib + 50Ic
Solving,
Ia = 24/0◦ A; Ib = 24/0◦ A; Ic = 19.2/0◦ A
.·. I2 = Ia − Ib = 0 A
N2 N2
[b] Ip = (I1 + I3 ) = (Ia + Ib
N1 N1
1
= (24 + 24) = 0.436/0◦ A
110
 9–58 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

[c] Check voltages —

V4 = 10I4 = 10Ic = 192/0◦ V
V5 = 20I5 = 20(Ia − Ic ) = 96/0◦ V
V6 = 40I6 = 20(Ib − Ic ) = 96/0◦ V

Where the two loads are equal, the current in the neutral conductor (I2 ) is zero,
and the voltages V5 and V6 are equal. The voltages V4 , V5 , and V6 are too low
for a reasonable dirtribution circuit.

P 9.87 [a]

125 = (R + 0.05 + j0.05)I1 − (0.03 + j0.03)I2 − RI3

125 = −(0.03 + j0.03)I1 + (R + 0.05 + j0.05)I2 − RI3

Subtracting the above two equations gives

0 = (R + 0.08 + j0.08)I1 − (R + 0.08 + j0.08)I2

.·. I1 = I2 so In = I1 − I2 = 0 A

[b] V1 = R(I1 − I3 ); V2 = R(I2 − I3 )

Since I1 = I2 (from part [a]) V1 = V2

[c]
 Problems 9–59

250 = (660.04 + j0.04)Ia − 660Ib

0 = −660Ia + 670Ib

Solving,
Ia = 25.28/− 0.23◦ = 25.28 − j0.10 A

Ib = 24.90/− 0.23◦ = 24.90 − j0.10 A

I1 = Ia − Ib = 0.377 − j0.00153 A

V1 = 60I1 = 22.63 − j0.0195 = 22.64/− 0.23◦ V

V2 = 600I1 = 226.3 − j0.915 = 226.4/− 0.23◦ V

[d]

125 = (60.05 + j0.05)I1 − (0.03 + j0.03)I2 − 60I3

125 = −(0.03 + j0.03)I1 + (600.05 + j0.05)I2 − 600I3

0 = −60I1 − 600I2 + 670I3

Solving,
I1 = 26.97/− 0.24◦ = 26.97 − j0.113 A

I2 = 25.10/− 0.24◦ = 25, 10 − j0.104 A

I3 = 24.90/− 0.24◦ = 24.90 − j0.104 A

V1 = 60(I1 − I3 ) = 124.4/− 0.27◦ V

V2 = 600(I2 − I3 ) = 124.6/− 0.20◦ V

[e] Because an open neutral can result in severely unbalanced voltages across the
125 V loads.
 9–60 CHAPTER 9. Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis

P 9.88 [a] Let N1 = primary winding turns and 2N2 = secondary winding turns. Then
14,000 250 N2 1
= ; .·. = =a
N1 2N2 N1 112
In part c),
Ip = 2aIa
2N2 Ia 1
.·. Ip = = Ia
N1 56
1
= (25.28 − j0.10)
56

Ip = 451.4 − j1.8 mA = 451.4/− 0.23◦ mA

In part d),
Ip N1 = I1 N2 + I2 N2
N2
.·. Ip = (I1 + I2 )
N1
1
= (26.97 − j0.11 + 25.10 − j0.10)
112
1
= (52.07 − j0.22)
112

Ip = 464.9 − j1.9 mA = 464.9/− 0.24◦ mA

[b] Yes, because the neutral conductor carries non-zero current whenever the load is
not balanced.