Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 179 views

    Boilera4 PDF

    Uploaded by

    suhailfarhaan
    This document compares different types of boilers for providing steam. It discusses integrated boiler reheat (IBR) boilers versus non-IBR coil type boilers. IBR boilers are more efficient due to condensate recovery, better steam quality, and ability to handle fluctuating loads. Data shown indicates IBR boilers from JN Marshall use less fuel and have lower operating costs than non-IBR coil type boilers, with payback periods of 2-4 months. Customer testimonials confirm annual fuel savings of 12-35 lacs and reduced maintenance problems with IBR boilers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Boilera4 PDF

    Uploaded by

    suhailfarhaan
    179 views4 pages
    This document compares different types of boilers for providing steam. It discusses integrated boiler reheat (IBR) boilers versus non-IBR coil type boilers. IBR boilers are more efficient due to condensate recovery, better steam quality, and ability to handle fluctuating loads. Data shown indicates IBR boilers from JN Marshall use less fuel and have lower operating costs than non-IBR coil type boilers, with payback periods of 2-4 months. Customer testimonials confirm annual fuel savings of 12-35 lacs and reduced maintenance problems with IBR boilers.

    Original Title

    boilera4.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document compares different types of boilers for providing steam. It discusses integrated boiler reheat (IBR) boilers versus non-IBR coil type boilers. IBR boilers are more efficient due to condensate recovery, better steam quality, and ability to handle fluctuating loads. Data shown indicates IBR boilers from JN Marshall use less fuel and have lower operating costs than non-IBR coil type boilers, with payback periods of 2-4 months. Customer testimonials confirm annual fuel savings of 12-35 lacs and reduced maintenance problems with IBR boilers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    179 views4 pages

    Boilera4 PDF

    Uploaded by

    suhailfarhaan
    This document compares different types of boilers for providing steam. It discusses integrated boiler reheat (IBR) boilers versus non-IBR coil type boilers. IBR boilers are more efficient due to condensate recovery, better steam quality, and ability to handle fluctuating loads. Data shown indicates IBR boilers from JN Marshall use less fuel and have lower operating costs than non-IBR coil type boilers, with payback periods of 2-4 months. Customer testimonials confirm annual fuel savings of 12-35 lacs and reduced maintenance problems with IBR boilers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    ISO 9001 : 2000

    Certificate: 04100 1994 0422

    J N Marshall
    Minimax Packaged Compact Boilers

    We
    makeDry

    Steam

    Specialists in Process Efficiency and Energy Conservation

    Consider
    Requirements

    Options
    NIBR Boiler

    Net steam requirement - 550 kg / hr

    IBR Boiler

    - with 20% wet steam & no


    condensate recovery
    - with condensate recovery

    Non-IBR
    Coil Type Boiler

    Air Vent

    Process Requires 550 kg/hr


    688 kg/hr
    (from Boiler)

    MS

    Hot water
    to drain
    138 kg/hr

    Feedwater
    30 C

    ?
    ?
    ?
    Pure condensate
    to drain 550 kg/hr

    Fuel: 47.22 lit/hr LDO

    JN Marshall Packaged Boilers

    A truly 3-PASS, Wet back boiler - designed to international standards!

    IBR
    Shell Type Boiler
    Air Vent
    Process requires 550 kg/hr
    Feedwater
    95OC

    550 kg/hr
    (from Boiler)

    Fuel: 36.3 lit/hr FO

    Returned to
    Feedwater
    Tank

    Cos
    l
    e
    u
    nF
    o
    g
    vin ,000/a
    s
    l
    a
    0
    Annu Rs. 21,8 Boiler
    M
    N
    J
    h
    t
    wi

    How Boilers compare when properly sized*


    Steam Requirements

    Coil Type Boiler

    JNM Boiler

    Process Demand
    - Constant
    - Fluctuating
    (Batch Type)
    - Instantaneous loads

    Process Demand
    8
    6

    Process Demand
    10
    10

    10

    Steam Quality
    Dryness, Cleanliness

    10

    Efficiency
    Boiler
    System Efficiency

    10
    7

    10
    10

    Maintenance
    Boiler
    System

    4
    2

    10
    10

    Safety

    10

    Maintenance of Steam Systems

    Space Requirement

    10

    n Average life of IBR Boiler is 18-20 years as


    against 7-10 years of NIBR Boiler

    Statutory Regulations

    10

    n NIBR Boilers are very sensitive to feedwater


    quality as against the IBR Boilers

    Water Quality

    10

    n IBR Boilers results in savings in water treatment


    chemicals due to condensate return

    Condensate return

    10

    n Maintenance costs on NIBR Boilers are high due


    to coil choking & regular replacement of coils

    Fuel Adaptability

    10

    Cost

    10

    88/150

    142/150

    Total

    *On reference scale of 10 (10 = Best)

    Process Benefits
    n Correct quantity of steam at the right time is
    essential in the process - IBR Boilers are
    capable of handling fluctuating loads
    n Wet steam from NIBR Boilers leads to poor
    heat transfer and increased batch time with
    lower productions - IBR Boilers avoid wet
    steam totally
    n A rubber component manufacturer near Pune
    using 4 nos. 600 kg/hr boilers was facing
    steam starvation problem and was planning
    for an additional Non-IBR boiler. JNM installed
    a 2 tph IBR boiler there. This resulted into
    reduction of steam consumption from
    3000 kg/hr to 900 kg/hr

    n TDS carry over and deposits on steam


    distribution network results in frequent
    maintenance and costly down time with NIBR
    Boilers

    JNM Boiler: 36% Better on overall rating

    4,25000

    Data
    Data considered for shell type boiler
    1. Fue
    1. Fuel: FO NCV 9650 kcal/kg, sp. Gravity 0.95, Cost 14 Rs/lit
    2. Feed water temp.: 95 deg with C (condensate recovery system) 2. Fee
    3. Inv
    3. Investment: 1 no. 750 kg/hr boiler & condensate system
    4. Ste
    4. Steam is 98% dry and saturated

    4,00000

    Annual Fuel Consumption (in Lit)

    3,50000
    3,25000

    JNM boiler (on FO)

    3,00000

    JNM boiler (on LDO)

    2,50000

    Coil type boiler (on LDO)

    2,25000

    Data considered for coil type boiler


    1. Fuel: LDO NCV 10200 kcal/kg, sp. Gravity 0.87, Cost 19 Rs/lit
    2. Feed water temp.: 30 deg C(No condensate recovery )
    3. Investment: 1 no. 850 kg/hr boiler or 2 nos. 600 kg/hr boilers
    4. Steam is 80% dry with 20% moisture content

    1,75000
    1,50000
    1,25000
    100000
    75,000
    50000

    0
    25%
    (150 kg/hr)

    50%
    (300 kg/hr)

    75%
    (450 kg/hr)
    Steam Load (%)

    100%
    (600 kg/hr)

    Notes :
    Payback period for JNM boiler on 100% load : 2 months
    Payback period for JNM boiler on 50% load : 4 months
    Boiler is assumed to be operating for 16 hrs/day for 350 days in
    an year. Boiler efficiency and dryness figures considered are
    as claimed by manufacturers.

    Average Fuel Consumption (lit/day)


    Users

    Annual savings

    Before

    After

    Coil type boiler

    Shell type boiler

    1050 - 1100

    800 - 850

    12

    Polybond, Alandi

    1441

    1233

    13

    Sarla Polyester, Vapi

    1050

    850

    12

    Garment Plant, Mumbai

    90

    550

    14 - 15

    Garment Plant, Chennai

    2500

    1800

    35

    Asian Paints, Gurgaon

    1000

    840

    13

    Beverages Plant, Goa

    900

    600

    12

    Miami Pharma, Shirwal

    (Rs.Lacs)

    What some of the customers say...

    Problems with
    achieving process

    I have saved more than

    temperature is a

    10 Lacs last year

    history now!

    on fuel bills.
    Thanks to JNM
    boilers!

    No more draining
    my precious

    Boiler maintenance

    condensate. I return

    problems have

    it to JNM boiler.

    vanished, my life is
    better now.

    Subject to change without notice

    3000/02/2004/3499

    J.N.Marshall Pvt. Ltd.


    A Forbes Marshall Company

    Mumbai - Pune Road, Kasarwadi, Pune - 411 034. India


    Tel: 91(0)20 - 27145595 l Fax: 91(0)20 - 27147413 l E - mail: seg@forbesmarshall.com
    Branches: Ahmedabad, Alibag, Bangalore, Chennai, Coimbatore, Delhi, Kolkata,
    Hyderabad, Jamshedpur, Lucknow, Mumbai, Nagpur, Navi Mumbai, Pune, Surat, Vadodara, Visakhapatnam
    Area Reps: Bharuch, Bhopal, Chandigarh, Cochin, Goa, Indore, Jamnagar, Kolhapur, Ludhiana, Pondicherry, Madurai
    www.forbesmarshall.com

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy