Er Ap Y.O RG: Combination Therapy
Er Ap Y.O RG: Combination Therapy
Er Ap Y.O RG: Combination Therapy
In general terms, combination therapy involves the simultaneous application of ultrasound (US)
with an electrical stimulation therapy. In Europe, Diadynamic Currents are frequently utilised,
but in the UK, US is most often combined with
bipolar Interferential Therapy (IF).
rg
the combined treatment are those of the individual
.o
modalities. There is no evidence at present for any
py
additional effects which can only be achieved when
the modalities are used in this particular way.
ra
he
It is suggested that:
ot
•
tr
effect.
el
• the accommodation effects that accompany IF treatment are reduced (or even eliminated)
w.
ww
rg
.o
• in localising lesions (especially chronic) ie.diagnostic use
py
• in ensuring accurate localisation of US treatment- to provide increased
accuracy/effectiveness in treating
ra
deeper lesions
he
Possible Explanation:
ec
Increased
Exposure of a peripheral nerve to US
sodium ion
el
+
(especially Sodium (Na ) and Calcium
++
(Ca ). By virtue of this adjusted
permeability, the nerve membrane is taken
closer to its threshold (the point where it <
depolarises, though doesn’t usually make -70
the nerve fire. The simultaneous mV
application of the Interferential current
through the nerve induces the
depolarisation potential, though it will take
a smaller current than usual to achieve this due to the potentiation effect of the ultrasound.
The combination of US with IF appears to give rise to less adverse treatment effects than are
associated with the combination of US with Diadynamic Currents, or other electrical
stimulations. It has also been suggested that a greater effective treatment depth can be achieved
with the US - IF combination though there is no direct evidence for such a claim..
rg
In summary, it would appear that by combining the two treatment modalities, none of the
.o
individual effects of the treatments are lost, but the benefit is that lower treatment intensities can
py
be used to achieve the same results, & there are additional benefits in terms of diagnosis &
treatment times.
ra
he
TREATMENT NOTES:
ot
tr
2
It is suggested that a continuous US output of 0.5W/cm should be used for this procedure,
w.
though numerous practitioners do claim to have achieved significant results with lower
ww
rg
into the tissues.. The IF output is most commonly set to 100Hz (with no sweep) using a bipolar
.o
output.
py
Technique:
ra
he
Place the indifferent electrode (the normal IF pad electrode) in a position so that the current can
ot
pass through the tissue in question. As a general guide, it can be placed on the same aspect of the
limb (more usual for superficial lesions) or on the opposite side of the limb (for deeper lesions).
tr
ec
Starting with the US head distant from the lesion, gradually increase the IF output intensity until
the `normal' tingling is encountered by the patient.
ww
Move towards the lesion site, noting any areas of increased sensitivity, local or referred pain.
The point of maximal sensitivity is assumed to be the focal point of the lesion, though it will not
provide information as to the precise tissue in question, nor to depth – only a ‘geographical’
location. This position is usually consistent and reproducible.
Diagnostic and therapeutic uses of Combination Therapy need not be used together. As a
treatment, it is appropriate when the therapeutic effects of US and those of IF are both justified.
The individual doses for the US and IF should be those which are appropriate for the lesion and
the required effects. There is no evidence that ‘special’ treatment doses are required. It should be
noted however, that the intensity of the IF required to achieve the usual effect is likely to be
lower than normal.
Some manufacturers suggest that it is not necessary to incorporate a swing in the IF dose as the
effect of accommodation is minimised. There does not appear to be any reason why an
appropriate frequency swing should not be used if it is appropriate to the effect required..
rg
.o
If the treatment times are dissimilar, there is a potential problem in that the US component will
py
usually finish first, leaving the IF element to continue in isolation. When the required treatment
times are similar, the combination of the modalities can save time and effort (even without
ra
additional effect). When they are dissimilar, it may be as effective to apply two separate
he
treatments.
ot
It is important to observe the safe & effective U/S treatment technique during combined
tr
treatment i.e. always using a moving treatment head, maintain effective contact, & maintain the
ec
perpendicular relationship between the treatment head & the patients skin whenever possible.
el
w.
Treatment Example :
ww
rg
Patient with an acute lesion/tear of the lateral ligament of the ankle. Ultrasound is justified on the
.o
basis that it will promote the inflammatory/repair process and interferential is used for its effect
py
in reducing acute pain.
ra
he
Interferential pad electrode placed medially at the ankle, US treatment head applied over the torn
component(s) of the lateral ligament.
ww
The treatment could be more effective than either one modality in isolation, though there is no
evidence that by using them simultaneously, there is any advantage over using them sequentially.
Contraindications:
There do not appear to be any specific contraindications for combination therapy other than
those for the individual modalities.