Modal Analysis of Spindle Shaped Tensairity Beams
Modal Analysis of Spindle Shaped Tensairity Beams
Modal Analysis of Spindle Shaped Tensairity Beams
Abstract
Tensairity is the new structural concept.It contains the combination of cable,membrane,struts and low pressure compressed
air.The role of the membrane and air is to stabilize the compression element against buckling and the cable.The technology is
good suited for wide span roofs,temporary bridges,domes etc. In this paper finite element based static and dynamic analysis of
spindle shaped Tensairity beam is studied.In this paper also includes the parametric studies and determine the natural
frequencies and deflections of the beam under different loading.Also determines load-displacement response of the spindle
shaped Tensairity beam.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
97
3. RESULTS
Fig -3: Longitudinal section dimension
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
98
NODAL SOLUTION
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =1
FREQ=6.35269
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.472687
SMX =.472687
SEP 18 2015
15:02:55
STEP=1
SUB =4
FREQ=24.2519
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.490445
SMX =.490445
SEP 18 2015
15:06:14
MX
MX
MN
MN
.052521
.105042
.157562
.210083
.262604
.315125
.367645
.420166
.054494
.108988
.163482
.217976
.326963
.272469
.381457
.435951
.490445
.472687
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =2
FREQ=7.25088
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.452365
SMX =.452365
SEP 18 2015
15:04:53
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =1
FREQ=6.40586
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.472117
SMX =.472117
MX
SEP 18 2015
15:14:44
MX
MN
MN
.050263
.100526
.150788
.201051
.251314
.301577
.351839
.402102
.452365
.052457
.104915
.157372
.20983
.262287
.314745
.367202
.41966
.472117
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =3
FREQ=17.5611
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.467533
SMX =.467533
SEP 18 2015
15:05:28
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =2
FREQ=7.31466
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.451954
SMX =.451954
SEP 18 2015
15:15:06
MX
MX
MN
MN
.051948
.103896
.155844
.207792
.25974
.311688
.363636
.415585
.467533
.050217
.100434
.150651
.200869
.251086
.301303
.35152
.401737
.451954
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
99
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =3
FREQ=17.6664
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.467414
SMX =.467414
SEP 18 2015
15:15:26
MX
MN
.051935
.10387
.155805
.20774
.259675
.311609
.363544
.415479
.467414
6.38Hz
6.23 Hz
4.66 Hz
7.30 Hz
6.91 Hz
5.27 Hz
17.61 Hz
15.83 Hz
12.79 Hz
24.67 Hz
17.22 Hz
14.51 Hz
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =4
FREQ=24.9374
USUM
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.489764
SMX =.489764
SEP 18 2015
15:15:44
MX
MN
.054418
.108836
.163255
.217673
.272091
.326509
.380928
.435346
.489764
6.38Hz
9.44 Hz
15.61 Hz
5.40 Hz
7.30 Hz
11.83 Hz
46.73 Hz
5.99 Hz
17.61 Hz
32.44 Hz
53.19 Hz
15.09 Hz
24.67 Hz
38.96 Hz
72.38 Hz
16.03 Hz
6.3527Hz
6.4059Hz
7.2509Hz
7.3147Hz
17.561Hz
17.666Hz
24.252Hz
24.937Hz
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
100
4.87 Hz
5.59 Hz
7.30 Hz
5.62 Hz
6.42 Hz
17.61 Hz
13.36 Hz
15.39 Hz
24.67 Hz
22.97 Hz
23.01 Hz
Material
Steel
210X109
7800
0.3
Copper
120X109
8940
0.35
Aluminium
69X109
2700
0.33
PVC
4.1X109
1390
0.4
Silicon
185X109
2330
0.27
Rubber
0.1X109
1100
0.46
Polyamide
2.14X108
620
0.34
SEP
9 2015
10:29:15
Poissons
ratio
DISPLACEMENT
STEP=2
SUB =50
TIME=2
DMX =.036108
AUG 10 2015
22:22:47
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
101
4. CONCLUSIONS
The important conclusions drawn from the various
parametric studies are sumarised.
From modal analysis seen that variation between
frequencies under two different pressures are very
small. So there is no effect on design of Tensairity
beam.
The tension and compression element having low
modulus of elasticity produce greater natural
frequencies..While desigining this should be taken
into account.
Tensairity beam with silicon fabric shows higher
natural frequencies than other three.And the rubber
fabric having very low natural frequiencies. While
desigining this should be taken into account.
From modal analysis found out that the dimensions of
tension and
compression element has
greater
influence in designing.
The spindle shape Tensairity beam with low modulus
of elasticty rod shows greater displacement.Tensairity
beam with high modulus of elasticity rod shows
minimum displacement.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
102
REFERENCES
[1] Theofanis S. Plagianakos , Uwe Teutsch , Ren Crettol
, Rolf H. Luchsinger . Static response of a spindleshaped
tensairity
column
to
axial
compression ;2009.
[2] Cdric Galliot , Rolf H. Luchsinger . Structural
behavior of symmetric spindle-shaped Tensairity
girders with reinforced chord coupling;2013.
[3] C. Galliot , R.H. Luchsinger . A simple model
describing the non-linear biaxial tensile behaviour of
PVC-coated polyester fabrics for use in finite element
analysis ;2009 .
[4] S.L. Veldman, O.K. Bergsma, A. Beukers. Bending of
anisotropic inflated cylindrical beams;2004.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
103