Conducting A Performance Appraisal
Conducting A Performance Appraisal
CONDUCTING AN
EFFECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
INTRODUCTION
Ken Blanchard, author of the best selling book, The One Minute Manager says,
"Feedback is the breakfast of champions."
Successful management-leaders realize that coaching is critical to attracting, retaining
and motivating successful employees. The performance appraisal event is a
misunderstood process. Often, it is not what is said or written, but how is said and
presented. This article presents successful techniques, strategies, text and communication
scripts for communicating performance coaching information.
Please review the document and follow the suggested script. Give us a call at
800.483.7153 or visit our website at www.onestophr.com for additional support
information.
Good luck on your journey!
B. Step Two: Observe performance. Have you conferred with other managers or
operations personnel with whom this person is likely to work? Do you have
specific behaviors to support the ratings and agrees on the appraisal form?
C. Step Three: Reviewed goals established from previous appraisals, if applicable.
Were the goals achieved? Were goals not achieved? Are there any developmental
areas established in the last review? Remember that the performance appraisal
process is ongoing; performance is reviewed daily, weekly, quarterly. There
should be no surprises during the review. One should not save all the problems
occurring in the previous 12 months and unload them during the appraisal. It is
hoped that most problems are addressed when they occur.
D. Step Four: Allow the employee to prepare a self-appraisal. Meet with the
employee one or two weeks prior to the appraisal. The following communication
is suggested:
"Mary, we have scheduled your appraisal for next week. I
would like you to complete an appraisal of how you see
your performance as it relates to the skill areas on the form.
Id also like you to identify skill areas that you feel identify
your major strengths plus any skill areas where you feel
additional development may be necessary. Be prepared to
discuss the progress in previous goals or developmental
areas established in our last review. Finally, identify at least
two goals for the coming 12-month period. Our goal is to
compare our forms so that I can objectively discuss your
performance." (Ensure form is understood and how skill
ratings are evaluatedclear up perceptions from the
beginning).
II.
A. Step Five: The following verbal and nonverbal skills are important
when setting the proper climate factors for the evaluation.
III.
reasons; ask questions; make and ask for suggestions. Essentially, you
jointly solve the problems together and develop an action plan to correct
it.
Note: These techniques may work in
tandem; that is, a tell-and-listen technique
may work into problem solving. Or, a telland-listen may work into a tell-and-sell if
there is no agreement. It all depends.
1. Once the employee identifies the goals (some may not), then proceed with
an explanation of your goals. Avoid directive phrases such as "you will."
Use phrases like "I would like," "How do you feel about?" "What is your
best estimate, Mary, on when we can achieve this?" If they agree, terrific.
If not, present your goals. (Refer to attachment entitled "Checklist for
Setting Good Objectives." All goals should satisfy the four-step criteria
established above).
D. Step Nine: Set date for next review
It is important to close the interview on a positive note. Set
the date for the next review and set up a monitoring system
for goal achievement. Advise the employee that you will be
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: Checklist for Good Objectives
Attachment 2: The Checklist for Good Objectives
Attachment 3: Cause and Effect for Different
Types of Appraisal Interviews
Attachment 4: Common Evaluation Errors
Attachment 5: Performance Appraisal Subpoena
Attachment 1
CHECKLIST FOR GOOD OBJECTIVES
Have you assessed the degree of difficulty for each objective? Do you have a
reasonable balance of high risk and low risk objectives?
Have you thought about the major actions to be taken to achieve the objectives?
Have you identified the consequences that your achievement of these objectives
will have?
The Key to Good Objectives
(sample approach)
A well written objective will state what results you expect
to accomplish, how and by when.
Example:
WHAT (Specific) Mary, I feel you need to strengthen your
public speaking ability.
HOW (Measurable) Attend a Dale Carnegie course.
WHEN (Time Bound) By September 1997.
W
H
Y
(
R
e
s
u
l
t
O
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
)
T
h
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
r
w
i
l
l
h
e
l
p
y
o
u
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
w
i
t
h
y
o
u
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
y
o
u
r
c
o
n
f
i
d
e
n
c
e
i
n
m
a
k
i
n
g
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
This approach should be followed when setting goals on the performance evaluation
form. This will ensure that the goal is properly communicated and completed.
Attachment 2
Tell-and-Sell
Tell-and-Listen
Problem Solving
Judge
Judge
Helper
-To communicate
evaluation
-To stimulate
growth and
development in
employee
-Defensive behavior
expressed
-Problem solving
behavior
Skills
-Salesmanship
-Listening and
reflecting feelings
-Listening and
reflecting feelings
-Summarizing
-Reflecting ideas
-Patience
-Using exploratory
questions
-Summarizing
Attitude
Motivation
-Resistance to change
reduced
-Increased
freedom
-Positive incentive
(Extrinsic and some
intrinsic motivation)
-Increased
responsibility
(Intrinsic in that
interest is inherent
in the task)
Gains
-Develops favorable
attitude to superior
which increases
probability of success
-Almost
Risks
-Develops favorable
attitude to superior
which increases
probability of success
-Almost assured
of improvement in
some respect
Values
Attachment 3
COMMON EVALUATION ERRORS
In any evaluation process there is a tendency to make certain errors that can lead to
inaccurate ratings. The following paragraphs present the six errors that evaluators are
most likely to make when rating a participant.
1. Contract Effect
The tendency to compare an employee against other employees instead of
according to the specific requirements of the job. To avoid contrast effect,
concentrate on how the employees performance compares to the
behaviors listed in the skill guide.
2. The Halo Effect
The tendency to allow one good (or bad) skill or characteristic about the
employee to influence the overall evaluation. Remember that because one
skill is good or poor, it does not necessarily follow that others will be the
same. When evaluating a skill, focus only on the employees performance
in that particular area.
3. Stereotyping
The tendency to overgeneralize about the characteristics of capabilities of
a specific group. The evaluator must rate each employee solely on his or
her observed performance.
4. Similar-To-Me-Effect
The tendency to give some employees higher ratings (regardless of their
qualifications) because they are similar to the evaluator. Alternatively,
giving those employees a lower rating because they are much different
than the evaluator. To avoid the similar-to-me-effect, rely solely on
observed performance in making evaluations.
5. Central Tendency
The tendency to play it safe and rate in the middle of the scale because
you are not sure of your evaluation of the employee. Make sure you get
the information you need to make confident rating decisions.
6. Negative and Positive Leniency
acknowledgment
The author acknowledges the excellent work of Dr. Lawrence M. Fogli, President,
C.O.R.E., Corp., 367 Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill, California. Certain excerpts from his
publication were incorporated in this guide.